From 14a560d09c61916501234e8722d65f2219ef8037 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver <okennedy@buffalo.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 14:01:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fixing spacing issue on page 3.  Back down to 15pp

---
 intro-rewrite-070921.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/intro-rewrite-070921.tex b/intro-rewrite-070921.tex
index e7938be..8120e4e 100644
--- a/intro-rewrite-070921.tex
+++ b/intro-rewrite-070921.tex
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ We stress that this question is very well motivated, even for one of the simples
 
 \mypar{Our lower bound results} Unfortunately, we prove the negative. In fact in Table~\ref{tab:lbs}\AR{Cref was not formatting Table correct so added Table in explicitly.} we show that depending on what hardness result/conjecture we assume, we get various emphatic versions of {\em no} as an answer to \Cref{prob:informal}.
 \begin{table}
-\begin{tabular}{|p{0.4\textwidth}|p{0.15\textwidth}|p{0.35\textwidth}|}
+\begin{tabular}{|p{0.43\textwidth}|p{0.12\textwidth}|p{0.35\textwidth}|}
 \hline
 Lower bound on $\timeOf{}^*(\query,\pdb)$ & Num. $\pd$s & Hardness Assumption\\
 \hline