%root: main.tex %!TEX root = ./main.tex %\onecolumn \subsection{Reduced Polynomials and Equivalences} We now introduce some terminology and develop a reduced form of lineage polynomials for a \abbrBIDB or \abbrTIDB. Note that a polynomial over $\vct{X}=(X_1,\dots,X_n)$ with individual degree $B <\infty$ is formally defined as (where $c_{\vct{d}}\in \semN$): \begin{equation} \label{eq:sop-form} \poly\inparen{X_1,\dots,X_n}=\sum_{\vct{d}\in\{0,\ldots,B\}^n} c_{\vct{d}}\cdot \prod_{i=1}^n X_i^{d_i}. \end{equation} %where $c_{\vct{d}}\in \semN$. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{Definition}[Standard Monomial Basis]\label{def:smb} The term $\prod_{i=1}^n X_i^{d_i}$ in \Cref{eq:sop-form} is a {\em monomial}. A polynomial $\poly\inparen{\vct{X}}$ is in standard monomial basis (\abbrSMB) when we keep only the terms with $c_{\vct{d}}\ne 0$ from \Cref{eq:sop-form}. \end{Definition} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Unless othewise noted, we consider all polynomials to be in \abbrSMB representation. When it is unclear, we use $\smbOf{\poly}$ to denote the \abbrSMB form of a polynomial $\poly$. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{Definition}[Degree]\label{def:degree} The degree of polynomial $\poly(\vct{X})$ is the largest $\sum_{i=1}^n d_i$ such that $c_{(d_1,\dots,d_n)}\ne 0$. % maximum sum of exponents, over all monomials in $\smbOf{\poly(\vct{X})}$. \end{Definition} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% As an example, the degree of the polynomial $X^2+2XY^2+Y^2$ is $3$. Product terms in lineage arise only from join operations (\Cref{fig:nxDBSemantics}), so intuitively, the degree of a lineage polynomial is analogous to the largest number of joins needed to produce a result tuple. %in any clause of the $\raPlus$ query that created it. We call a polynomial $\poly\inparen{\vct{X}}$ a \emph{\bi-lineage polynomial} (resp., \emph{\ti-lineage polynomial}, or simply lineage polynomial), if there exists a $\raPlus$ query $\query$, \bi (\ti) $\pdb$, and result tuple $\tup$ such that $\poly\inparen{\vct{X}} = \apolyqdt\inparen{\vct{X}}.$ %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{Definition}[Reduced \bi Polynomials]\label{def:reduced-bi-poly} Let $\poly(\vct{X})$ be a \bi-lineage polynomial. The reduced form $\rpoly(\vct{X})$ of $\poly(\vct{X})$ is the same as \Cref{def:reduced-poly} with the added constraint that all monomials with variables $X_{\block, i}, X_{\block, j}, i\neq j$ from the same block $\block$ are omitted. \end{Definition} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % Consider a $\abbrBIDB$ polynomial $\poly\inparen{\vct{X}} = X_{1, 1}X_{1, 2} + X_{1, 2}X_{2, 1}^2$. Then by \Cref{def:reduced-bi-poly}, we have that $\rpoly\inparen{\vct{X}} = X_{1, 2}X_{2, 1}$. Next, we show why the reduced form is useful for our purposes. %%Removing this example to save space \iffalse \begin{Example}\label{example:qtilde} Consider $\poly(X, Y) = (X + Y)(X + Y)$ where $X$ and $Y$ are from different blocks. The expanded derivation for $\rpoly(X, Y)$ is \begin{align*} (&X^2 + 2XY + Y^2 \mod X^2 - X) \mod Y^2 - Y\\ = ~&X + 2XY + Y^2 \mod Y^2 - Y\\ = ~& X + 2XY + Y \end{align*} \end{Example} \fi %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{Lemma}\label{lem:exp-poly-rpoly} Let $\pdb$ be a \abbrBIDB over $\numvar$ input tuples such that the probability distribution $\pdassign$ over $\{0,1\}^\numvar$ (the all worlds set) is induced by the probability vector $\probAllTup = (\prob_1, \ldots, \prob_\numvar)$. As in \Cref{lem:tidb-reduce-poly} for \abbrTIDB, any \abbrBIDB-lineage polynomial $\poly(\vct{X})$ based on $\pdb$ and query $\query$ we have: % The expectation over possible worlds in $\poly(\vct{X})$ is equal to $\rpoly(\prob_1,\ldots, \prob_\numvar)$. \begin{equation*} \expct_{\vct{W}\sim \pdassign}\pbox{\poly(\vct{W})} = \rpoly(\probAllTup). \end{equation*} \end{Lemma} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Let $\abs{\poly}$ be the number of operators in $\poly$. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{Corollary}\label{cor:expct-sop} If $\poly$ is a \bi-lineage polynomial already in \abbrSMB, then the expectation of $\poly$, i.e., $\expct\pbox{\poly} = \rpoly\left(\prob_1,\ldots, \prob_\numvar\right)$ can be computed in $\bigO{\abs{\poly}}$ time. \end{Corollary} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%% Local Variables: %%% mode: latex %%% TeX-master: "main" %%% End: