22 lines
1.4 KiB
TeX
22 lines
1.4 KiB
TeX
%root: main.tex
|
|
%!TEX root=./main.tex
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Single $\prob$ value}
|
|
\label{sec:single-p}
|
|
|
|
While \Cref{thm:mult-p-hard-result} shows that computing $\rpoly(\prob,\dots,\prob)$ for multiple values of $\prob$ in general is hard it does not rule out the possibility that one can compute this value exactly for a {\em fixed} value of $\prob$. %Indeed, it is easy to check that
|
|
One can compute $\rpoly(\prob,\dots,\prob)$ exactly in linear time for $\prob\in \inset{0,1}$. Next, we show that these are the only two possibilities:
|
|
|
|
\begin{Theorem}\label{th:single-p-hard}
|
|
Fix $\prob\in (0,1)$. Then assuming \Cref{conj:graph}, any algorithm that computes $\rpoly_{G}^3(\prob,\dots,\prob)$ for arbitrary $G = (\vset, \edgeSet)$ exactly has to run in time $\Omega\inparen{\abs{\edgeSet}^{1+\eps_0}}$, where $\eps_0$ is as in \Cref{conj:graph}.
|
|
\end{Theorem}
|
|
|
|
Note that \Cref{lem:tdet-om} and \Cref{th:single-p-hard} above imply the hardness result in the first row of \Cref{tab:lbs}.
|
|
We note that \Cref{thm:k-match-hard} and \Cref{conj:known-algo-kmatch} (and the lower bounds in the second and third rows) need $k$ to be large enough (in particular, we need a family of hard queries). But the above \Cref{th:single-p-hard} (and the lower bound in first row of Table~\ref{tab:lbs}) holds for $k=3$ (and hence for a fixed query). \textcolor{red}{Need to put in a proof overview here-- Atri}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%% Local Variables:
|
|
%%% mode: latex
|
|
%%% TeX-master: "main"
|
|
%%% End:
|