ODIn/spark-instrumented-optimizer
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
spark-instrumented-optimizer/sql/core/benchmarks/CSVBenchmark-jdk11-results.txt

68 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
================================================================================================
Benchmark to measure CSV read/write performance
================================================================================================
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.118.04 on Linux 4.15.0-1044-aws
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Parsing quoted values: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
One quoted string 44297 44515 373 0.0 885948.7 1.0X
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.118.04 on Linux 4.15.0-1044-aws
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Wide rows with 1000 columns: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
Select 1000 columns 196720 197783 1560 0.0 196719.8 1.0X
Select 100 columns 46691 46861 219 0.0 46691.4 4.2X
Select one column 36811 36922 111 0.0 36811.3 5.3X
count() 8520 8610 106 0.1 8520.5 23.1X
Select 100 columns, one bad input field 67914 67994 136 0.0 67914.0 2.9X
Select 100 columns, corrupt record field 77272 77445 214 0.0 77272.0 2.5X
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.118.04 on Linux 4.15.0-1044-aws
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Count a dataset with 10 columns: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
Select 10 columns + count() 25965 26054 103 0.4 2596.5 1.0X
Select 1 column + count() 18591 18666 91 0.5 1859.1 1.4X
count() 6102 6119 18 1.6 610.2 4.3X
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.118.04 on Linux 4.15.0-1044-aws
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Write dates and timestamps: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
Create a dataset of timestamps 2142 2161 17 4.7 214.2 1.0X
to_csv(timestamp) 14744 14950 182 0.7 1474.4 0.1X
write timestamps to files 12078 12202 175 0.8 1207.8 0.2X
Create a dataset of dates 2275 2291 18 4.4 227.5 0.9X
to_csv(date) 11407 11464 51 0.9 1140.7 0.2X
write dates to files 7638 7702 90 1.3 763.8 0.3X
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.118.04 on Linux 4.15.0-1044-aws
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz
Read dates and timestamps: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[SPARK-30409][SPARK-29173][SQL][TESTS] Use `NoOp` datasource in SQL benchmarks ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to replace `.collect()`, `.count()` and `.foreach(_ => ())` in SQL benchmarks and use the `NoOp` datasource. I added an implicit class to `SqlBasedBenchmark` with the `.noop()` method. It can be used in benchmark like: `ds.noop()`. The last one is unfolded to `ds.write.format("noop").mode(Overwrite).save()`. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid additional overhead that `collect()` (and other actions) has. For example, `.collect()` has to convert values according to external types and pull data to the driver. This can hide actual performance regressions or improvements of benchmarked operations. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Re-run all modified benchmarks using Amazon EC2. | Item | Description | | ---- | ----| | Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) | | Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) | | AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) | | Java | OpenJDK8/10 | - Run `TPCDSQueryBenchmark` using instructions from the PR #26049 ``` # `spark-tpcds-datagen` needs this. (JDK8) $ git clone https://github.com/apache/spark.git -b branch-2.4 --depth 1 spark-2.4 $ export SPARK_HOME=$PWD $ ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests # Generate data. (JDK8) $ git clone gitgithub.com:maropu/spark-tpcds-datagen.git $ cd spark-tpcds-datagen/ $ build/mvn clean package $ mkdir -p /data/tpcds $ ./bin/dsdgen --output-location /data/tpcds/s1 // This need `Spark 2.4` ``` - Other benchmarks ran by the script: ``` #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd benchmarks = [ ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AggregateBenchmark'], ['avro/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.AvroReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.BloomFilterBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DataSourceReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ExtractBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.FilterPushdownBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.InExpressionBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.IntervalBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.JoinBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MakeDateTimeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.MiscBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.RangeBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.UDFBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideSchemaBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.WideTableBenchmark'], ['hive/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.OrcReadBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'], ['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark'] ] print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1') os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1' for b in benchmarks: print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1]) run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])]) ``` Closes #27078 from MaxGekk/noop-in-benchmarks. Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-01-12 16:18:19 -05:00
read timestamp text from files 2578 2590 10 3.9 257.8 1.0X
read timestamps from files 60103 60694 512 0.2 6010.3 0.0X
infer timestamps from files 107871 108268 351 0.1 10787.1 0.0X
read date text from files 2306 2310 4 4.3 230.6 1.1X
read date from files 47415 47657 367 0.2 4741.5 0.1X
infer date from files 35261 35447 164 0.3 3526.1 0.1X
timestamp strings 3045 3056 11 3.3 304.5 0.8X
parse timestamps from Dataset[String] 62221 63173 849 0.2 6222.1 0.0X
infer timestamps from Dataset[String] 118838 119629 697 0.1 11883.8 0.0X
date strings 3459 3481 19 2.9 345.9 0.7X
parse dates from Dataset[String] 51026 51447 503 0.2 5102.6 0.1X
from_csv(timestamp) 60738 61818 936 0.2 6073.8 0.0X
from_csv(date) 46012 46278 370 0.2 4601.2 0.1X
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
[SPARK-30323][SQL] Support filters pushdown in CSV datasource ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to support pushed down filters in CSV datasource. The reason of pushing a filter up to `UnivocityParser` is to apply the filter as soon as all its attributes become available i.e. converted from CSV fields to desired values according to the schema. This allows to skip conversions of other values if the filter returns `false`. This can improve performance when pushed filters are highly selective and conversion of CSV string fields to desired values are comparably expensive ( for example, conversion to `TIMESTAMP` values). Here are details of the implementation: - `UnivocityParser.convert()` converts parsed CSV tokens one-by-one sequentially starting from index 0 up to `parsedSchema.length - 1`. At current index `i`, it applies filters that refer to attributes at row fields indexes `0..i`. If any filter returns `false`, it skips conversions of other input tokens. - Pushed filters are converted to expressions. The expressions are bound to row positions according to `requiredSchema`. The expressions are compiled to predicates via generating Java code. - To be able to apply predicates to partially initialized rows, the predicates are grouped, and combined via the `And` expression. Final predicate at index `N` can refer to row fields at the positions `0..N`, and can be applied to a row even if other fields at the positions `N+1..requiredSchema.lenght-1` are not set. ### Why are the changes needed? The changes improve performance on synthetic benchmarks more **than 9 times** (on JDK 8 & 11): ``` OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.5+10 on Mac OS X 10.15.2 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4850HQ CPU 2.30GHz Filters pushdown: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ w/o filters 11889 11945 52 0.0 118893.1 1.0X pushdown disabled 11790 11860 115 0.0 117902.3 1.0X w/ filters 1240 1278 33 0.1 12400.8 9.6X ``` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? - Added new test suite `CSVFiltersSuite` - Added tests to `CSVSuite` and `UnivocityParserSuite` Closes #26973 from MaxGekk/csv-filters-pushdown. Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-01-15 23:10:08 -05:00
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.5+10 on Mac OS X 10.15.2
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4850HQ CPU @ 2.30GHz
Filters pushdown: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
w/o filters 11889 11945 52 0.0 118893.1 1.0X
pushdown disabled 11790 11860 115 0.0 117902.3 1.0X
w/ filters 1240 1278 33 0.1 12400.8 9.6X
[SPARK-29320][TESTS] Compare `sql/core` module in JDK8/11 (Part 1) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR regenerates the `sql/core` benchmarks in JDK8/11 to compare the result. In general, we compare the ratio instead of the time. However, in this PR, the average time is compared. This PR should be considered as a rough comparison. **A. EXPECTED CASES(JDK11 is faster in general)** - [x] BloomFilterBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at CSV/ORC) - [x] CSVBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] ColumnarBatchBenchmark (JDK11 is faster at `boolean`/`string` and some cases in `int`/`array`) - [x] DatasetBenchmark (JDK11 is faster with `string`, but is slower for `long` type) - [x] ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) - [x] ExtractBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except HOUR/MINUTE/SECOND/MILLISECONDS/MICROSECONDS) - [x] HashedRelationMetricsBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] JSONBenchmark (JDK11 is much faster except eight cases) - [x] JoinBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except five cases) - [x] OrcNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is faster in nine cases) - [x] PrimitiveArrayBenchmark (JDK11 is faster) - [x] SortBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except `Arrays.sort` case) - [x] UDFBenchmark (N/A, values are too small) - [x] UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except one case) - [x] WideTableBenchmark (JDK11 is faster except two cases) **B. CASES WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE MORE LATER** - [x] AggregateBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] CompressionSchemeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general except `string`) - [x] DataSourceReadBenchmark (JDK11 is slower in general) - [x] DateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slightly slower in general except `parsing`) - [x] MakeDateTimeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except two cases) - [x] MiscBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except ten cases) - [x] OrcV2NestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower) - [x] ParquetNestedSchemaPruningBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except six cases) - [x] RangeBenchmark (JDK11 is slower except one case) `FilterPushdownBenchmark/InExpressionBenchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark` will be compared later because it took long timer. ### Why are the changes needed? According to the result, there are some difference between JDK8/JDK11. This will be a baseline for the future improvement and comparison. Also, as a reproducible environment, the following environment is used. - Instance: `r3.xlarge` - OS: `CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)` - JDK: - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-b10)` - `OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.4+11-LTS)` ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? This is a test-only PR. We need to run benchmark. Closes #26003 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29320. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-03 11:58:25 -04:00
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink