### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch converts CR/LF into LF in 3 source files, which most files are only using LF. This patch also add rules to enforce EOL as LF for all java, scala, xml, py, R files.
### Why are the changes needed?
The majority of source code files are using LF and only three files are CR/LF. While using IDE would let us don't bother with the difference, it still has a chance to make unnecessary diff if the file is modified with the editor which doesn't handle it automatically.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
```
grep -IUrl --color "^M" . | grep "\.java\|\.scala\|\.xml\|\.py\|\.R" | grep -v "/target/" | grep -v "/build/" | grep -v "/dist/" | grep -v "dependency-reduced-pom.xml" | grep -v ".pyc"
```
(Please note you'll need to type CTRL+V -> CTRL+M in bash shell to get `^M` because it's representing CR/LF, not a combination of `^` and `M`.)
Before the patch, the result is:
```
./sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/ColumnDictionary.java
./sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/complexTypesSuite.scala
./sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ComplexTypes.scala
```
and after the patch, the result is None.
And git shows WARNING message if EOL of any of source files in given types are modified to CR/LF, like below:
```
warning: CRLF will be replaced by LF in sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala.
The file will have its original line endings in your working directory.
```
Closes#27365 from HeartSaVioR/MINOR-remove-CRLF-in-source-codes.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add identifier and catalog information in DataSourceV2Relation so it would be possible to do richer checks in checkAnalysis step.
### Why are the changes needed?
In data source v2, table implementations are all customized so we may not be able to get the resolved identifier from tables them selves. Therefore we encode the table and catalog information in DSV2Relation so no external changes are needed to make sure this information is available.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in the following suites:
CatalogManagerSuite.scala
CatalogV2UtilSuite.scala
SupportsCatalogOptionsSuite.scala
PlanResolutionSuite.scala
Closes#26957 from yuchenhuo/SPARK-30314.
Authored-by: Yuchen Huo <yuchen.huo@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 1d20d13149.
Closes#27351 from gatorsmile/revertSPARK25496.
Authored-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to prune unnecessary nested fields from Generate which has no Project on top of it.
### Why are the changes needed?
In Optimizer, we can prune nested columns from Project(projectList, Generate). However, unnecessary columns could still possibly be read in Generate, if no Project on top of it. We should prune it too.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#26978 from viirya/SPARK-29721.
Lead-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <liangchi@uber.com>
Co-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Disable all the V2 file sources in Spark 3.0 by default.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are still some missing parts in the file source V2 framework:
1. It doesn't support reporting file scan metrics such as "numOutputRows"/"numFiles"/"fileSize" like `FileSourceScanExec`. This requires another patch in the data source V2 framework. Tracked by [SPARK-30362](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30362)
2. It doesn't support partition pruning with subqueries(including dynamic partition pruning) for now. Tracked by [SPARK-30628](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30628)
As we are going to code freeze on Jan 31st, this PR proposes to disable all the V2 file sources in Spark 3.0 by default.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#27348 from gengliangwang/disableFileSourceV2.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to rename spark.sql.subquery.reuse to spark.sql.execution.subquery.reuse.enabled
### Why are the changes needed?
Make it consistent and clear.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
N/A. This is a [new conf added in Spark 3.0](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23998)
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27346 from gatorsmile/spark27083.
Authored-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this PR, I propose to move the `RESERVED_PROPERTIES `s from `SupportsNamespaces` and `TableCatalog` to `CatalogV2Util`, which can keep `RESERVED_PROPERTIES ` safe for interval usages only.
### Why are the changes needed?
the `RESERVED_PROPERTIES` should not be changed by subclasses
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
existing uts
Closes#27318 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30603.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix a bug in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26589 , to make this feature work.
### Why are the changes needed?
This feature doesn't work actually.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
new test
Closes#27341 from cloud-fan/cache.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expressions are very likely to be serialized and sent to executors, we should avoid unnecessary serialization overhead as much as we can.
This PR fixes `AggregateExpression`.
### Why are the changes needed?
small improvement
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27342 from cloud-fan/fix.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move the `defaultNamespace` method from the interface `SupportsNamespace` to `CatalogPlugin`.
### Why are the changes needed?
While I'm implementing JDBC V2, I realize that the default namespace is very an important information. Even if you don't want to implement namespace manipulation functionalities like CREATE/DROP/ALTER namespace, you still need to report the default namespace.
The default namespace is not about functionality but a matter of correctness. If you don't know the default namespace of a catalog, it's wrong to assume it's `[]`. You may get table not found exception if you do so.
I think it's more reasonable to put the `defaultNamespace` method in the base class `CatalogPlugin`. It returns `[]` by default so won't bother implementation if they really don't have namespace concept.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, but for an unreleased API.
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27319 from cloud-fan/ns.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to remove the conf
### Why are the changes needed?
This rule can be excluded using spark.sql.optimizer.excludedRules without an extra conf
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27334 from gatorsmile/spark27871.
Authored-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit b5cb9abdd5.
### Why are the changes needed?
The merged commit (#27243) was too risky for several reasons:
1. It doesn't fix a bug
2. It makes the resolution of the table that's going to be altered a child. We had avoided this on purpose as having an arbitrary rule change the child of AlterTable seemed risky. This change alone is a big -1 for me for this change.
3. While the code may look cleaner, I think this approach makes certain things harder, e.g. differentiating between the Hive based Alter table CHANGE COLUMN and ALTER COLUMN syntax. Resolving and normalizing columns for ALTER COLUMN also becomes a bit harder, as we now have to check every single AlterTable command instead of just a single ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN statement
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests
This closes#27315Closes#27327 from brkyvz/revAlter.
Authored-by: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Skip resolving the merge expressions if the target is a DSv2 table with ACCEPT_ANY_SCHEMA capability.
### Why are the changes needed?
Some DSv2 sources may want to customize the merge resolution logic. For example, a table that can accept any schema (TableCapability.ACCEPT_ANY_SCHEMA) may want to allow certain merge queries that are blocked (that is, throws AnalysisError) by the default resolution logic. So there should be a way to completely bypass the merge resolution logic in the Analyzer.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, since merge itself is an unreleased feature
### How was this patch tested?
added unit test to specifically test the skipping.
Closes#27326 from tdas/SPARK-30609.
Authored-by: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SubqueryExec#relationFuture` make a copy of `org.apache.spark.SparkContext#localProperties` and pass it to the sub-execution thread in `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SubqueryExec#executionContext`
### Why are the changes needed?
Local properties set via sparkContext are not available as TaskContext properties when executing jobs and threadpools have idle threads which are reused
Explanation:
When `SubqueryExec`, the relationFuture is evaluated via a separate thread. The threads inherit the `localProperties` from `sparkContext` as they are the child threads.
These threads are created in the `executionContext` (thread pools). Each Thread pool has a default keepAliveSeconds of 60 seconds for idle threads.
Scenarios where the thread pool has threads which are idle and reused for a subsequent new query, the thread local properties will not be inherited from spark context (thread properties are inherited only on thread creation) hence end up having old or no properties set. This will cause taskset properties to be missing when properties are transferred by child thread via `sparkContext.runJob/submitJob`
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT
Closes#27267 from ajithme/subquerylocalprop.
Authored-by: Ajith <ajith2489@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add additional constructor in the `Like` expression. The constructor can be used on applying the `like` function with 2 parameters.
### Why are the changes needed?
`FunctionRegistry` cannot find a constructor if the `like` function is applied to 2 parameters.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, before:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT like('Spark', '_park');
Invalid arguments for function like; line 1 pos 7
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Invalid arguments for function like; line 1 pos 7
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.FunctionRegistry$.$anonfun$expression$7(FunctionRegistry.scala:618)
at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:189)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.FunctionRegistry$.$anonfun$expression$4(FunctionRegistry.scala:602)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.SimpleFunctionRegistry.lookupFunction(FunctionRegistry.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.SessionCatalog.lookupFunction(SessionCatalog.scala:1412)
```
After:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT like('Spark', '_park');
true
```
### How was this patch tested?
By running `check outputs of expression examples` from `SQLQuerySuite`.
Closes#27323 from MaxGekk/fix-like-func.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this PR, I'd propose to fully support interval for the CSV and JSON functions.
On one hand, CSV and JSON records consist of string values, in the cast logic, we can cast string from/to interval now, so we can make those functions support intervals easily.
Before this change we can only use this as a workaround.
```sql
SELECT cast(from_csv('1, 1 day', 'a INT, b string').b as interval)
struct<CAST(from_csv(1, 1 day).b AS INTERVAL):interval>
1 days
```
On the other hand, we ban reading or writing intervals from CSV and JSON files. To directly read and write with external json/csv storage, you still need explicit cast, e.g.
```scala
spark.read.schema("a string").json("a.json").selectExpr("cast(a as interval)").show
+------+
| a|
+------+
|1 days|
+------+
```
### Why are the changes needed?
for interval's future-proofing purpose
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, the `to_json`/`from_json` function can deal with intervals now. e.g.
for `from_json` there is no such use case because we do not support `a interval`
for `to_json`, we can use interval values now
#### before
```sql
SELECT to_json(map('a', interval 25 month 100 day 130 minute));
Error in query: cannot resolve 'to_json(map('a', INTERVAL '2 years 1 months 100 days 2 hours 10 minutes'))' due to data type mismatch: Unable to convert column a of type interval to JSON.; line 1 pos 7;
'Project [unresolvedalias(to_json(map(a, 2 years 1 months 100 days 2 hours 10 minutes), Some(Asia/Shanghai)), None)]
+- OneRowRelation
```
#### after
```sql
SELECT to_json(map('a', interval 25 month 100 day 130 minute))
{"a":"2 years 1 months 100 days 2 hours 10 minutes"}
```
### How was this patch tested?
add ut
Closes#27317 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30592.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
when resolving the `Assignment` of insert action in MERGE INTO, only resolve with the source table, to avoid ambiguous attribute failure if there is a same-name column in the target table.
### Why are the changes needed?
The insert action is used when NOT MATCHED, so it can't access the row from the target table anyway.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
on
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#27265 from cloud-fan/merge.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr removes the nonstandard `SET OWNER` syntax for namespaces and changes the owner reserved properties from `ownerName` and `ownerType` to `owner`.
### Why are the changes needed?
the `SET OWNER` syntax for namespaces is hive-specific and non-sql standard, we need a more future-proofing design before we implement user-facing changes for SQL security issues
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no, just revert an unpublic syntax
### How was this patch tested?
modified uts
Closes#27300 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30591.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add optimizer rule PruneHiveTablePartitions pruning hive table partitions based on filters on partition columns.
Doing so, the total size of pruned partitions may be small enough for broadcast join in JoinSelection strategy.
### Why are the changes needed?
In JoinSelection strategy, spark use the "plan.stats.sizeInBytes" to decide whether the plan is suitable for broadcast join.
Currently, "plan.stats.sizeInBytes" does not take "pruned partitions" into account, so it may miss some broadcast join and take sort-merge join instead, which will definitely impact join performance.
This PR aim at taking "pruned partitions" into account for hive table in "plan.stats.sizeInBytes" and then improve performance by using broadcast join if possible.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
This is based on #25919, credits should go to lianhuiwang and advancedxy.
Closes#26805 from fuwhu/SPARK-15616.
Authored-by: fuwhu <bestwwg@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR propose to disallow negative `scale` of `Decimal` in Spark. And this PR brings two behavior changes:
1) for literals like `1.23E4BD` or `1.23E4`(with `spark.sql.legacy.exponentLiteralAsDecimal.enabled`=true, see [SPARK-29956](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29956)), we set its `(precision, scale)` to (5, 0) rather than (3, -2);
2) add negative `scale` check inside the decimal method if it exposes to set `scale` explicitly. If check fails, `AnalysisException` throws.
And user could still use `spark.sql.legacy.allowNegativeScaleOfDecimal.enabled` to restore the previous behavior.
### Why are the changes needed?
According to SQL standard,
> 4.4.2 Characteristics of numbers
An exact numeric type has a precision P and a scale S. P is a positive integer that determines the number of significant digits in a particular radix R, where R is either 2 or 10. S is a non-negative integer.
scale of Decimal should always be non-negative. And other mainstream databases, like Presto, PostgreSQL, also don't allow negative scale.
Presto:
```
presto:default> create table t (i decimal(2, -1));
Query 20191213_081238_00017_i448h failed: line 1:30: mismatched input '-'. Expecting: <integer>, <type>
create table t (i decimal(2, -1))
```
PostgrelSQL:
```
postgres=# create table t(i decimal(2, -1));
ERROR: NUMERIC scale -1 must be between 0 and precision 2
LINE 1: create table t(i decimal(2, -1));
^
```
And, actually, Spark itself already doesn't allow to create table with negative decimal types using SQL:
```
scala> spark.sql("create table t(i decimal(2, -1))");
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
no viable alternative at input 'create table t(i decimal(2, -'(line 1, pos 28)
== SQL ==
create table t(i decimal(2, -1))
----------------------------^^^
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException.withCommand(ParseDriver.scala:263)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parse(ParseDriver.scala:130)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkSqlParser.parse(SparkSqlParser.scala:48)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parsePlan(ParseDriver.scala:76)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.$anonfun$sql$1(SparkSession.scala:605)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.QueryPlanningTracker.measurePhase(QueryPlanningTracker.scala:111)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sql(SparkSession.scala:605)
... 35 elided
```
However, it is still possible to create such table or `DatFrame` using Spark SQL programming API:
```
scala> val tb =
CatalogTable(
TableIdentifier("test", None),
CatalogTableType.MANAGED,
CatalogStorageFormat.empty,
StructType(StructField("i", DecimalType(2, -1) ) :: Nil))
```
```
scala> spark.sql("SELECT 1.23E4BD")
res2: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [1.23E+4: decimal(3,-2)]
```
while, these two different behavior could make user confused.
On the other side, even if user creates such table or `DataFrame` with negative scale decimal type, it can't write data out if using format, like `parquet` or `orc`. Because these formats have their own check for negative scale and fail on it.
```
scala> spark.sql("SELECT 1.23E4BD").write.saveAsTable("parquet")
19/12/13 17:37:04 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 0.0 in stage 0.0 (TID 0)
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid DECIMAL scale: -2
at org.apache.parquet.Preconditions.checkArgument(Preconditions.java:53)
at org.apache.parquet.schema.Types$BasePrimitiveBuilder.decimalMetadata(Types.java:495)
at org.apache.parquet.schema.Types$BasePrimitiveBuilder.build(Types.java:403)
at org.apache.parquet.schema.Types$BasePrimitiveBuilder.build(Types.java:309)
at org.apache.parquet.schema.Types$Builder.named(Types.java:290)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.SparkToParquetSchemaConverter.convertField(ParquetSchemaConverter.scala:428)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.SparkToParquetSchemaConverter.convertField(ParquetSchemaConverter.scala:334)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.SparkToParquetSchemaConverter.$anonfun$convert$2(ParquetSchemaConverter.scala:326)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:238)
at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:941)
at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach$(Iterator.scala:941)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1429)
at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach(IterableLike.scala:74)
at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach$(IterableLike.scala:73)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType.foreach(StructType.scala:99)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:238)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:231)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType.map(StructType.scala:99)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.SparkToParquetSchemaConverter.convert(ParquetSchemaConverter.scala:326)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetWriteSupport.init(ParquetWriteSupport.scala:97)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetOutputFormat.getRecordWriter(ParquetOutputFormat.java:388)
at org.apache.parquet.hadoop.ParquetOutputFormat.getRecordWriter(ParquetOutputFormat.java:349)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetOutputWriter.<init>(ParquetOutputWriter.scala:37)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetFileFormat$$anon$1.newInstance(ParquetFileFormat.scala:150)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.SingleDirectoryDataWriter.newOutputWriter(FileFormatDataWriter.scala:124)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.SingleDirectoryDataWriter.<init>(FileFormatDataWriter.scala:109)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.executeTask(FileFormatWriter.scala:264)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.$anonfun$write$15(FileFormatWriter.scala:205)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:90)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:127)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.$anonfun$run$3(Executor.scala:441)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinally(Utils.scala:1377)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:444)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```
So, I think it would be better to disallow negative scale totally and make behaviors above be consistent.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, if `spark.sql.legacy.allowNegativeScaleOfDecimal.enabled=false`, user couldn't create Decimal value with negative scale anymore.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests in `ExpressionParserSuite` and `DecimalSuite`;
Updated `SQLQueryTestSuite`.
Closes#26881 from Ngone51/nonnegative-scale.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This revert https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26418, file a new ticket under https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30546 for better tracking interval behavior
### Why are the changes needed?
Revert interval ISO/ANSI SQL Standard output since we decide not to follow ANSI and there is no round trip
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no, not released yet
### How was this patch tested?
existing uts
Closes#27304 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30593.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For LogicalPlan(e.g. `MultiInstanceRelation`, `Project`, `Aggregate`, etc) whose output doesn't inherit directly from its children, we could just stop collect on it. Because we could always replace all the lower conflict attributes with the new attributes from the new plan.
Otherwise, we should recursively collect conflict plans, like `Generate`, `Window`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Performance improvement.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass existed tests.
Closes#27263 from Ngone51/spark_30433_followup.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After this commit d67b98ea01, we are able to create table or alter table with interval column types if the external catalog accepts which is varying the interval type's purpose for internal usage. With d67b98ea01 's original purpose it should only work from cast logic.
Instead of adding type checker for the interval type from commands to commands to work among catalogs, It much simpler to treat interval as an invalid data type but can be identified by cast only.
### Why are the changes needed?
enhance interval internal usage purpose.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO,
Additionally, this PR restores user behavior when using interval type to create/alter table schema, e.g. for hive catalog
for 2.4,
```java
Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
DataType calendarinterval is not supported.(line 1, pos 0)
```
for master after d67b98ea01
```java
Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Error: type expected at the position 0 of 'interval' but 'interval' is found.
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.Hive.createTable(Hive.java:862)
```
now with this pr, we restore the type checker in spark side.
### How was this patch tested?
add more ut
Closes#27277 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30568.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `owner` property to v2 table, it is reversed by `TableCatalog`, indicates the table's owner.
### Why are the changes needed?
enhance ownership management of catalog API
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, add 1 reserved property - `owner` , and it is not allowed to use in OPTIONS/TBLPROPERTIES anymore, only if legacy on
### How was this patch tested?
add uts
Closes#27249 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30019.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to clean up `UnivocityParser`.
### Why are the changes needed?
It will slightly improve the performance since we don't do unnecessary computation for Array concatenations/creation.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually ran the existing tests.
Closes#27287 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-30530-followup.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to output additional msg from the tests where a log appender is added. The message is printed as a part of `IllegalStateException` in the case of reaching the limit of maximum number of logged events.
### Why are the changes needed?
If a log appender is not removed from the log4j appenders list. the caller message could help to investigate the problem and find the test which doesn't remove the log appender.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suites `AvroSuite`, `CSVSuite`, `ResolveHintsSuite` and etc.
Closes#27296 from MaxGekk/assign-name-to-log-appender.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use the new framework to resolve the ALTER TABLE commands.
This PR also refactors ALTER TABLE logical plans such that they extend a base class `AlterTable`. Each plan now implements `def changes: Seq[TableChange]` for any table change operations.
Additionally, `UnresolvedV2Relation` and its usage is completely removed.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a part of effort to make the relation lookup behavior consistent: [SPARK-29900](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Updated existing tests
Closes#27243 from imback82/v2commands_newframework.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Changed signature of `rawParser` passed to `FailureSafeParser`. I propose to change return type from `Seq` to `Iterable`. I took `Iterable` to easier port the changes on Scala collections 2.13. Also, I replaced `Seq` by `Option` in CSV datasource - `UnivocityParser`, and in JSON parser exception one place in the case when specified schema is `StructType`, and JSON input is an array.
### Why are the changes needed?
`Seq` is unnecessary requirement for return type from rawParser which may not have multiple rows per input like CSV datasource.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `JsonSuite`, `UnivocityParserSuite`, `JsonFunctionsSuite`, `JsonExpressionsSuite`, `CsvSuite`, and `CsvFunctionsSuite`.
Closes#27264 from MaxGekk/failuresafe-parser-seq.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements a tiny performance optimization for a `GenericArrayData` constructor, avoiding an unnecessary roundtrip through `WrappedArray` when the provided value is already an array of objects.
It also fixes a related performance problem in `ParquetRowConverter`.
### Why are the changes needed?
`GenericArrayData` has a `this(seqOrArray: Any)` constructor, which was originally added in #13138 for use in `RowEncoder` (where we may not know concrete types until runtime) but is also called (perhaps unintentionally) in a few other code paths.
In this constructor's existing implementation, a call to `new WrappedArray(Array[Object](""))` is dispatched to the `this(seqOrArray: Any)` constructor, where we then call `this(array.toSeq)`: this wraps the provided array into a `WrappedArray`, which is subsequently unwrapped in a `this(seq.toArray)` call. For an interactive example, see https://scastie.scala-lang.org/7jOHydbNTaGSU677FWA8nA
This PR changes the `this(seqOrArray: Any)` constructor so that it calls the primary `this(array: Array[Any])` constructor, allowing us to save a `.toSeq.toArray` call; this comes at the cost of one additional `case` in the `match` statement (but I believe this has a negligible performance impact relative to the other savings).
As code cleanup, I also reverted the JVM 1.7 workaround from #14271.
I also fixed a related performance problem in `ParquetRowConverter`: previously, this code called `ArrayBasedMapData.apply` which, in turn, called the `this(Any)` constructor for `GenericArrayData`: this PR's micro-benchmarks show that this is _significantly_ slower than calling the `this(Array[Any])` constructor (and I also observed time spent here during other Parquet scan benchmarking work). To fix this performance problem, I replaced the call to the `ArrayBasedMapData.apply` method with direct calls to the `ArrayBasedMapData` and `GenericArrayData` constructors.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
I tested this by running code in a debugger and by running microbenchmarks (which I've added to a new `GenericArrayDataBenchmark` in this PR):
- With JDK8 benchmarks: this PR's changes more than double the performance of calls to the `this(Any)` constructor. Even after improvements, however, calls to the `this(Array[Any])` constructor are still ~60x faster than calls to `this(Any)` when passing a non-primitive array (thereby motivating this patch's other change in `ParquetRowConverter`).
- With JDK11 benchmarks: the changes more-or-less completely eliminate the performance penalty associated with the `this(Any)` constructor.
Closes#27088 from JoshRosen/joshrosen/GenericArrayData-optimization.
Authored-by: Josh Rosen <rosenville@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to fix the bug reported in SPARK-30530. CSV datasource returns invalid records in the case when `parsedSchema` is shorter than number of tokens returned by UniVocity parser. In the case `UnivocityParser.convert()` always throws `BadRecordException` independently from the result of applying filters.
For the described case, I propose to save the exception in `badRecordException` and continue value conversion according to `parsedSchema`. If a bad record doesn't pass filters, `convert()` returns empty Seq otherwise throws `badRecordException`.
### Why are the changes needed?
It fixes the bug reported in the JIRA ticket.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added new test from the JIRA ticket.
Closes#27239 from MaxGekk/spark-30530-csv-filter-is-null.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As we are not going to follow ANSI to implement year-month and day-time interval types, it is weird to compare the year-month part to the day-time part for our current implementation of interval type now.
Additionally, the current ordering logic comes from PostgreSQL where the implementation of the interval is messy. And we are not aiming PostgreSQL compliance at all.
THIS PR will revert https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26681 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26337
### Why are the changes needed?
make interval type more future-proofing
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
there are new in 3.0, so no
### How was this patch tested?
existing uts shall work
Closes#27262 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30551.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[SPARK-20568](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20568) added the possibility to clean up completed files in streaming query. Deleting/archiving uses the main thread which can slow down processing. In this PR I've created thread pool to handle file delete/archival. The number of threads can be configured with `spark.sql.streaming.fileSource.cleaner.numThreads`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Do file delete/archival in separate thread.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#26502 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-29876.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use the new framework to resolve the SHOW TBLPROPERTIES command. This PR along with #27243 should update all the existing V2 commands with `UnresolvedV2Relation`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a part of effort to make the relation lookup behavior consistent: [SPARK-2990](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES temp_view` now fails with `AnalysisException` will be thrown with a message `temp_view is a temp view not table`. Previously, it was returning empty row.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#26921 from imback82/consistnet_v2command.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a `V1Scan` interface, so that data source v1 implementations can migrate to DS v2 much easier.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's a lot of work to migrate v1 sources to DS v2. The new API added here can allow v1 sources to go through v2 code paths without implementing all the Batch, Stream, PartitionReaderFactory, ... stuff.
We already have a v1 write fallback API after https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25348
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
new test suite
Closes#26231 from cloud-fan/v1-read-fallback.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to remove the SQL config `spark.sql.execution.pandas.respectSessionTimeZone` which has been deprecated since Spark 2.3.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve code maintainability.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
### How was this patch tested?
by running python tests, https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/building-spark.html#pyspark-tests-with-maven-or-sbtCloses#27218 from MaxGekk/remove-respectSessionTimeZone.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
TableCatalog reserves some properties, e,g `provider`, `location` for internal usage. Some of them are static once create, some of them need specific syntax to modify. Instead of using `OPTIONS (k='v')` or TBLPROPERTIES (k='v'), if k is a reserved TableCatalog property, we should use its specific syntax to add/modify/delete it. e.g. `provider` is a reserved property, we should use the `USING` clause to specify it, and should not allow `ALTER TABLE ... UNSET TBLPROPERTIES('provider')` to delete it. Also, there are two paths for v1/v2 catalog tables to resolve these properties, e.g. the v1 session catalog tables will only use the `USING` clause to decide `provider` but v2 tables will also lookup OPTION/TBLPROPERTIES(although there is a bug prohibit it).
Additionally, 'path' is not reserved but holds special meaning for `LOCATION` and it is used in `CREATE/REPLACE TABLE`'s `OPTIONS` sub-clause. Now for the session catalog tables, the `path` is case-insensitive, but for the non-session catalog tables, it is case-sensitive, we should make it both case insensitive for disambiguation.
### Why are the changes needed?
prevent reserved properties from being modified unexpectedly
unify the property resolution for v1/v2.
fix some bugs.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes
1 . `location` and `provider` (case sensitive) cannot be used in `CREATE/REPLACE TABLE ... OPTIONS/TBLPROPETIES` and `ALTER TABLE ... SET TBLPROPERTIES (...)`, if legacy on, they will be ignored to let the command success without having side effects
3. Once `path` in `CREATE/REPLACE TABLE ... OPTIONS` is case insensitive for v1 but sensitive for v2, but now we change it case insensitive for both kinds of tables, then v2 tables will also fail if `LOCATION` and `OPTIONS('PaTh' ='abc')` are both specified or will pick `PaTh`'s value as table location if `LOCATION` is missing.
4. Now we will detect if there are two different case `path` keys or more in `CREATE/REPLACE TABLE ... OPTIONS`, once it is a kind of unexpected last-win policy for v1, and v2 is case sensitive.
### How was this patch tested?
add ut
Closes#27197 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30507.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to support pushed down filters in CSV datasource. The reason of pushing a filter up to `UnivocityParser` is to apply the filter as soon as all its attributes become available i.e. converted from CSV fields to desired values according to the schema. This allows to skip conversions of other values if the filter returns `false`. This can improve performance when pushed filters are highly selective and conversion of CSV string fields to desired values are comparably expensive ( for example, conversion to `TIMESTAMP` values).
Here are details of the implementation:
- `UnivocityParser.convert()` converts parsed CSV tokens one-by-one sequentially starting from index 0 up to `parsedSchema.length - 1`. At current index `i`, it applies filters that refer to attributes at row fields indexes `0..i`. If any filter returns `false`, it skips conversions of other input tokens.
- Pushed filters are converted to expressions. The expressions are bound to row positions according to `requiredSchema`. The expressions are compiled to predicates via generating Java code.
- To be able to apply predicates to partially initialized rows, the predicates are grouped, and combined via the `And` expression. Final predicate at index `N` can refer to row fields at the positions `0..N`, and can be applied to a row even if other fields at the positions `N+1..requiredSchema.lenght-1` are not set.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes improve performance on synthetic benchmarks more **than 9 times** (on JDK 8 & 11):
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.5+10 on Mac OS X 10.15.2
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4850HQ CPU 2.30GHz
Filters pushdown: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
w/o filters 11889 11945 52 0.0 118893.1 1.0X
pushdown disabled 11790 11860 115 0.0 117902.3 1.0X
w/ filters 1240 1278 33 0.1 12400.8 9.6X
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Added new test suite `CSVFiltersSuite`
- Added tests to `CSVSuite` and `UnivocityParserSuite`
Closes#26973 from MaxGekk/csv-filters-pushdown.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Based on the [comment](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26956#discussion_r366680558), this patch changes the SQL config name from `spark.sql.truncateTable.ignorePermissionAcl` to `spark.sql.truncateTable.ignorePermissionAcl.enabled`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make this config consistent other SQL configs.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#27210 from viirya/truncate-table-permission-followup.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For decimal values between -1.0 and 1.0, it should has same precision and scale in `Decimal`, in order to make it be consistent with `DecimalType`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, for values between -1.0 and 1.0, precision and scale is inconsistent between `Decimal` and `DecimalType`. For example, for numbers like 0.3, it will have (precision, scale) as (2, 1) in `Decimal`, but (1, 1) in `DecimalType`:
```
scala> Literal(new BigDecimal("0.3")).dataType.asInstanceOf[DecimalType].precision
res3: Int = 1
scala> Literal(new BigDecimal("0.3")).value.asInstanceOf[Decimal].precision
res4: Int = 2
```
We should make `Decimal` be consistent with `DecimalType`. And, here, we change it to only count precision digits after dot for values between -1.0 and 1.0 as other DBMS does, like hive:
```
hive> create table testrel as select 0.3;
hive> describe testrel;
OK
_c0 decimal(1,1)
```
This could bring larger scale for values between -1.0 and 1.0.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Updated existed tests.
Closes#27217 from Ngone51/set-decimal-from-javadecimal.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use the new framework to resolve the DESCRIBE TABLE command.
The v1 DESCRIBE TABLE command supports both table and view. Checked with Hive and Presto, they don't have DESCRIBE TABLE syntax but only DESCRIBE, which supports both table and view:
1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+DDL#LanguageManualDDL-DescribeTable/View/MaterializedView/Column
2. https://prestodb.io/docs/current/sql/describe.html
We should make it clear that DESCRIBE support both table and view, by renaming the command to `DescribeRelation`.
This PR also tunes the framework a little bit to support the case that a command accepts both table and view.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a part of effort to make the relation lookup behavior consistent: SPARK-29900.
Note that I make a separate PR here instead of #26921, as I need to update the framework to support a new use case: accept both table and view.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27187 from cloud-fan/describe.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr intends to fix wrong aggregated values in `GROUPING SETS` when there are duplicated grouping sets in a query (e.g., `GROUPING SETS ((k1),(k1))`).
For example;
```
scala> spark.table("t").show()
+---+---+---+
| k1| k2| v|
+---+---+---+
| 0| 0| 3|
+---+---+---+
scala> sql("""select grouping_id(), k1, k2, sum(v) from t group by grouping sets ((k1),(k1,k2),(k2,k1),(k1,k2))""").show()
+-------------+---+----+------+
|grouping_id()| k1| k2|sum(v)|
+-------------+---+----+------+
| 0| 0| 0| 9| <---- wrong aggregate value and the correct answer is `3`
| 1| 0|null| 3|
+-------------+---+----+------+
// PostgreSQL case
postgres=# select k1, k2, sum(v) from t group by grouping sets ((k1),(k1,k2),(k2,k1),(k1,k2));
k1 | k2 | sum
----+------+-----
0 | 0 | 3
0 | 0 | 3
0 | 0 | 3
0 | NULL | 3
(4 rows)
// Hive case
hive> select GROUPING__ID, k1, k2, sum(v) from t group by k1, k2 grouping sets ((k1),(k1,k2),(k2,k1),(k1,k2));
1 0 NULL 3
0 0 0 3
```
[MS SQL Server has the same behaviour with PostgreSQL](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26961#issuecomment-573638442). This pr follows the behaviour of PostgreSQL/SQL server; it adds one more virtual attribute in `Expand` for avoiding wrongly grouping rows with the same grouping ID.
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix bugs.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.
Closes#26961 from maropu/SPARK-29708.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The changes in the rule `SimplifyBinaryComparison` from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27008 could bring performance regression in the optimizer when there are a large set of filter conditions.
We need to improve the implementation and reduce the time complexity.
### Why are the changes needed?
Need to fix the potential performance regression in the optimizer.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Also run a micor benchmark in `BinaryComparisonSimplificationSuite`
```
object Optimize extends RuleExecutor[LogicalPlan] {
val batches =
Batch("Constant Folding", FixedPoint(50),
SimplifyBinaryComparison) :: Nil
}
test("benchmark") {
val a = Symbol("a")
val condition = (1 to 500).map(i => EqualTo(a, a)).reduceLeft(And)
val finalCondition = And(condition, IsNotNull(a))
val plan = nullableRelation.where(finalCondition).analyze
val start = System.nanoTime()
Optimize.execute(plan)
println((System.nanoTime() - start) /1000000)
}
```
Before the changes: 2507ms
After the changes: 3ms
Closes#27212 from gengliangwang/SimplifyBinaryComparison.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Skew Join is common and can severely downgrade performance of queries, especially those with joins. This PR aim to optimization the skew join based on the runtime Map output statistics by adding "OptimizeSkewedPartitions" rule. And The details design doc is [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NkXN-ck8jUOS0COz3f8LUW5xzF8j9HFjoZXWGGX2HAg/edit). Currently we can support "Inner, Cross, LeftSemi, LeftAnti, LeftOuter, RightOuter" join type.
### Why are the changes needed?
To optimize the skewed partition in runtime based on AQE
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
UT
Closes#26434 from JkSelf/skewedPartitionBasedSize.
Lead-authored-by: jiake <ke.a.jia@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: JiaKe <ke.a.jia@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If spark.sql.ansi.enabled is set,
throw exception when cast to any numeric type do not follow the ANSI SQL standards.
### Why are the changes needed?
ANSI SQL standards do not allow invalid strings to get casted into numeric types and throw exception for that. Currently spark sql gives NULL in such cases.
Before:
`select cast('str' as decimal) => NULL`
After :
`select cast('str' as decimal) => invalid input syntax for type numeric: str`
These results are after setting `spark.sql.ansi.enabled=true`
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now when ansi mode is on users will get arithmetic exception for invalid strings.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit Tests Added.
Closes#26933 from iRakson/castDecimalANSI.
Lead-authored-by: root1 <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to define a sub-class of `AppenderSkeleton` in `SparkFunSuite` and reuse it from other tests. The class stores incoming `LoggingEvent` in an array which is available to tests for future analysis of logged events.
### Why are the changes needed?
This eliminates code duplication in tests.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites - `CSVSuite`, `OptimizerLoggingSuite`, `JoinHintSuite`, `CodeGenerationSuite` and `SQLConfSuite`.
Closes#27166 from MaxGekk/dedup-appender-skeleton.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to remove already deprecated SQL configs:
- `spark.sql.variable.substitute.depth` deprecated in Spark 2.1
- `spark.sql.parquet.int64AsTimestampMillis` deprecated in Spark 2.3
Also I moved `removedSQLConfigs` closer to `deprecatedSQLConfigs`. This will allow to have references to other config entries.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve code maintainability.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `ParquetQuerySuite` and `SQLConfSuite`.
Closes#27169 from MaxGekk/remove-deprecated-conf-2.4.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25248 .
### Why are the changes needed?
The new behavior cannot access the existing table which is created by old behavior.
This PR provides a way to avoid new behavior for the existing users.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. This will fix the broken behavior on the existing tables.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins and manually run JDBC integration test.
```
build/mvn install -DskipTests
build/mvn -Pdocker-integration-tests -pl :spark-docker-integration-tests_2.12 test
```
Closes#27184 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-28152-CONF.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add cache for Like and RLike when pattern is not static
### Why are the changes needed?
When pattern is not static, we should avoid compile pattern every time if some pattern is same.
Here is perf numbers, include 3 test groups and use `range` to make it easy.
```
// ---------------------
// 10,000 rows and 10 partitions
val df1 = spark.range(0, 10000, 1, 10).withColumnRenamed("id", "id1")
val df2 = spark.range(0, 10000, 1, 10).withColumnRenamed("id", "id2")
val start = System.currentTimeMillis
df1.join(df2).where("id2 like id1").count()
// before 16939
// after 6352
println(System.currentTimeMillis - start)
// ---------------------
// 10,000 rows and 100 partitions
val df1 = spark.range(0, 10000, 1, 100).withColumnRenamed("id", "id1")
val df2 = spark.range(0, 10000, 1, 100).withColumnRenamed("id", "id2")
val start = System.currentTimeMillis
df1.join(df2).where("id2 like id1").count()
// before 11070
// after 4680
println(System.currentTimeMillis - start)
// ---------------------
// 20,000 rows and 10 partitions
val df1 = spark.range(0, 20000, 1, 10).withColumnRenamed("id", "id1")
val df2 = spark.range(0, 20000, 1, 10).withColumnRenamed("id", "id2")
val start = System.currentTimeMillis
df1.join(df2).where("id2 like id1").count()
// before 66962
// after 29934
println(System.currentTimeMillis - start)
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Closes#26875 from ulysses-you/SPARK-30245.
Authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
