### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds DataTypeOps test to check the ops is loaded as expected.
### Why are the changes needed?
When complete https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32821, I found there are no test for DataTypeOps. There were many logic when DataTypeOps loaded, it's better to add the test to make sure interface stable.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test only
### How was this patch tested?
test passed.
Closes#32859 from Yikun/SPARK-XXXXX1.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up of #32886 to fix the Jenkins' linter.
### Why are the changes needed?
The PR #32886 was mistakenly merged before Jenkins' linter passes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Closes#32965 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35478/fup.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds more type annotations in the file `python/pyspark/pandas/window.py` and fixes the mypy check failures.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should enable more disallow_untyped_defs mypy checks.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
This PR adds more type annotations in pandas APIs on the Spark module, which can impact interaction with development tools for users.
### How was this patch tested?
The mypy check with a new configuration and existing tests should pass.
Closes#32886 from pingsutw/SPARK-35478.
Authored-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Introduce a DecimalOps for DecimalType
- Make `isnull` method data-type-based
### Why are the changes needed?
Now DecimalType, DoubleType, and FloatType data share the FractionalOps class, but DecimalType behaves differently from FloatType and DoubleType (as https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/pyspark/pandas/base.py#L987-L990), so we propose to introduce DecimalOps. The behavior difference here is caused by DecimalType could not have NaN.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35342
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- New added DecimalOpsTest passed
- Existing NumOpsTest passed
Closes#32821 from Yikun/SPARK-35342.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds more type annotations in the file `python/pyspark/pandas/accessors.py` and fixes the mypy check failures.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should enable more disallow_untyped_defs mypy checks.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
This PR adds more type annotations in pandas APIs on Spark module, which can impact interaction with development tools for users.
### How was this patch tested?
The mypy check with a new configuration and existing tests should pass.
Closes#32956 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35469/disallow_untyped_defs.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
PySpark added pinned thread mode at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24898 to sync Python thread to JVM thread. Previously, one JVM thread could be reused which ends up with messed inheritance hierarchy such as thread local especially when multiple jobs run in parallel. To completely fix this, we should enable this mode by default.
### Why are the changes needed?
To correctly support parallel job submission and management.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now Python thread is mapped to JVM thread one to one.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover it.
Closes#32429 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35303.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to merge contents and remove obsolete pages in Development section, especially about pandas API on Spark.
Some were removed, and some were merged to the existing PySpark guides. I will inline some comments in the PRs to make the review easier.
### Why are the changes needed?
To guide developers on the code base of pandas API on Spark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it updates the user-facing documentation.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually built the docs and checked.
Closes#32926 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35644.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fix the wrong behavior of `Index.difference` in pandas APIs on Spark, based on the comment https://github.com/databricks/koalas/pull/1325#discussion_r647889901 and https://github.com/databricks/koalas/pull/1325#discussion_r647890007
- it couldn't handle the case properly when `self` is `Index` or `MultiIndex` and `other` is `MultiIndex` or `Index`.
```python
>>> midx1 = ps.MultiIndex.from_tuples([('a', 'x', 1), ('b', 'z', 2), ('k', 'z', 3)])
>>> idx1 = ps.Index([1, 2, 3])
>>> midx1 = ps.MultiIndex.from_tuples([('a', 'x', 1), ('b', 'z', 2), ('k', 'z', 3)])
>>> midx1.difference(idx1)
pyspark.pandas.exceptions.PandasNotImplementedError: The method `pd.Index.__iter__()` is not implemented. If you want to collect your data as an NumPy array, use 'to_numpy()' instead.
```
- it's collecting the all data into the driver side when the other is list-like objects, especially when the `other` is distributed object such as Series which is very dangerous.
And added the related test cases.
### Why are the changes needed?
To correct the incompatible behavior with pandas, and to prevent the case which potentially cause the OOM easily.
```python
>>> midx1 = ps.MultiIndex.from_tuples([('a', 'x', 1), ('b', 'z', 2), ('k', 'z', 3)])
>>> idx1 = ps.Index([1, 2, 3])
>>> midx1 = ps.MultiIndex.from_tuples([('a', 'x', 1), ('b', 'z', 2), ('k', 'z', 3)])
>>> midx1.difference(idx1)
MultiIndex([('a', 'x', 1),
('b', 'z', 2),
('k', 'z', 3)],
)
```
And now it only using the for loop when the `other` is only the case `list`, `set` or `dict`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the previous bug is fixed as described in the above code examples.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested with linter and unittest in local, and it might be passed on CI.
Closes#32853 from itholic/SPARK-35683.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify the `pandas_udf` usage to use type-annotation based pandas_udf or avoid specifying udf types to suppress warnings.
### Why are the changes needed?
The usage of `pandas_udf` in pandas-on-Spark is outdated and shows warnings.
We should use type-annotation based `pandas_udf` or avoid specifying udf types.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32913 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35761/suppress_warnings.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to rename "pandas APIs on Spark" to "pandas API on Spark" which is more natural (since API stands for Application Program Interface).
### Why are the changes needed?
To make it sound more natural.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
It fixes a typo in the unreleased changes.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#32903 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34885.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes the upperbound for numpy for pandas-on-Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
We can remove the upper-bound for numpy for pandas-on-Spark because currently it works well on the CI with numpy 1.20.3.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32908 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35759/numpy.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make `astype` method data-type-based.
**Non-goal: Match pandas' `astype` TypeErrors.**
Currently, `astype` throws TypeError error messages only when the destination type is not recognized. However, for some destination types that don't make sense to the specific type of Series/Index, for example, `numeric Series/Index → bytes`, we don't have proper TypeError error messages.
Since the goal of the PR is refactoring mainly, the above issue might be resolved later if needed.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are many type checks in the `astype` method. Since `DataTypeOps` and its subclasses are introduced, we should refactor `astype` to make it data-type-based. In this way, code is cleaner, more maintainable, and more flexible.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32847 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_astype.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to port the fix https://github.com/databricks/koalas/pull/2172.
```python
ks.DataFrame({'a': [1, 2, 3], 'b':["a", "b", "c"], 'c': [4, 5, 6]}).plot(kind='hist', x='a', y='c', bins=200)
```
**Before:**
```
pyspark.sql.utils.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'least(min(a), min(b), min(c))' due to data type mismatch: The expressions should all have the same type, got LEAST(bigint, string, bigint).;
'Aggregate [unresolvedalias(least(min(a#1L), min(b#2), min(c#3L)), Some(org.apache.spark.sql.Column$$Lambda$1556/0x0000000800d9484042fb0cc1)), unresolvedalias(greatest(max(a#1L), max(b#2), max(c#3L)), Some(org.apache.spark.sql.Column$$Lambda$1556/0x0000000800d9484042fb0cc1))]
+- Project [a#1L, b#2, c#3L]
+- Project [__index_level_0__#0L, a#1L, b#2, c#3L, monotonically_increasing_id() AS __natural_order__#8L]
+- LogicalRDD [__index_level_0__#0L, a#1L, b#2, c#3L], false
```
**After:**
```python
Figure({
'data': [{'hovertemplate': 'variable=a<br>value=%{text}<br>count=%{y}',
'name': 'a',
...
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To match the behaviour with panadas' and allow users to set `x` and `y` in the DataFrame with non-numeric columns.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No to end users since the changes is not released yet. Yes to dev as described before.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, added a test and tested in notebooks:
Closes#32884 from HyukjinKwon/fix-hist-plot.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds more type annotations in the file `python/pyspark/pandas/namespace.py` and fixes the mypy check failures.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should enable more disallow_untyped_defs mypy checks.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
This PR adds more type annotations in pandas APIs on Spark module, which can impact interaction with development tools for users.
### How was this patch tested?
The mypy check with a new configuration and existing tests should pass.
Closes#32871 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35475/disallow_untyped_defs.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes the change the name "Koalas" to the "Pandas APIs on Spark" in the documents.
### Why are the changes needed?
Since we don't use the name "Koalas" anymore.
We should use "Pandas APIs on Spark" instead.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the name "Koalas" is renamed to "Pandas APIs on Spark" in the documents.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually built the docs and checked one by one.
Closes#32835 from itholic/SPARK-35591.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds more type annotations in the file:
`python/pyspark/pandas/spark/indexing.py`
and fixes the mypy check failures.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should enable more disallow_untyped_defs mypy checks.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
This PR adds more type annotations in pandas APIs on Spark module, which can impact interaction with development tools for users.
### How was this patch tested?
The mypy check with a new configuration and existing tests should pass.
`./dev/lint-python`
Closes#32738 from pingsutw/SPARK-35474.
Authored-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adjust pandas-on-spark test_groupby_multiindex_columns test in order to pass with different pandas versions.
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas had introduced bugs as below:
- For pandas 1.1.3 and 1.1.4
Type error: only integer scalar arrays can be converted to a scalar index
- For pandas < 1.0.4
Type error: Can only tuple-index with a MultiIndex
We ought to adjust `test_groupby_multiindex_columns` tests by comparing with a predefined return value, rather than comparing with the pandas return value in the pandas versions above.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32851 from xinrong-databricks/SPARK-35705.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to restructure User Guide in PySpark documentation for pandas APIs on Spark.
**Before**
**After**
Note that I mostly just moved the contents around except minor changes:
- Removing some questions in FAQ that don't make sense in Apache Spark
- Rename a subtitle "Working with pandas and PySpark" to "From/to pandas and PySpark DataFrames"
For renaming Koalas to either pandas-on-Spark or pandas APIs on Spark, it will be done at SPARK-35591
### Why are the changes needed?
For better readability.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it restructures the documentation as shown above.
### How was this patch tested?
I manually built the docs and tested.
Closes#32820 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35647.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Limit the batch size for `add_shuffle_key` in `partitionBy` function to fix `OverflowError: cannot convert float infinity to integer`
### Why are the changes needed?
It's not easy to write a UT, but I can use some simple code to explain the bug.
* Original code
```
def add_shuffle_key(split, iterator):
buckets = defaultdict(list)
c, batch = 0, min(10 * numPartitions, 1000)
for k, v in iterator:
buckets[partitionFunc(k) % numPartitions].append((k, v))
c += 1
# check used memory and avg size of chunk of objects
if (c % 1000 == 0 and get_used_memory() > limit
or c > batch):
n, size = len(buckets), 0
for split in list(buckets.keys()):
yield pack_long(split)
d = outputSerializer.dumps(buckets[split])
del buckets[split]
yield d
size += len(d)
avg = int(size / n) >> 20
# let 1M < avg < 10M
if avg < 1:
batch *= 1.5
elif avg > 10:
batch = max(int(batch / 1.5), 1)
c = 0
```
if `get_used_memory() > limit` always is `True` and `avg < 1` always is `True`, the variable `batch` will grow to infinity. then `batch = max(int(batch / 1.5), 1)` may raise `OverflowError` if `avg > 10` at some time.
* sample code to reproduce the bug
```
import sys
limit = 100
used_memory = 200
numPartitions = 64
c, batch = 0, min(10 * numPartitions, 1000)
while True:
c += 1
if (c % 1000 == 0 and used_memory > limit or c > batch):
batch = batch * 1.5
d = max(int(batch / 1.5), 1)
print(c, batch)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
It's not easy to write a UT, there is sample code to test
```
import sys
limit = 100
used_memory = 200
numPartitions = 64
c, batch = 0, min(10 * numPartitions, 1000)
while True:
c += 1
if (c % 1000 == 0 and used_memory > limit or c > batch):
batch = min(sys.maxsize, batch * 1.5)
d = max(int(batch / 1.5), 1)
print(c, batch)
```
Closes#32667 from nolanliou/fix_partitionby.
Authored-by: liuqi <nolan.liou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to restructure API files according to the layout, see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32799. Now the pandas APIs on Spark are under a separate directory which is same level as other modules such as Spark SQL.
```bash
tree reference
```
**Before:**
```
reference
├── index.rst
├── ps_extensions.rst
├── ps_frame.rst
├── ps_general_functions.rst
├── ps_groupby.rst
├── ps_indexing.rst
├── ps_io.rst
├── ps_ml.rst
├── ps_series.rst
├── ps_window.rst
├── pyspark.ml.rst
├── pyspark.mllib.rst
├── pyspark.pandas.rst
├── pyspark.resource.rst
├── pyspark.rst
├── pyspark.sql.rst
├── pyspark.ss.rst
└── pyspark.streaming.rst
```
**After:**
```
reference
├── index.rst
├── pyspark.ml.rst
├── pyspark.mllib.rst
├── pyspark.pandas
│ ├── extensions.rst
│ ├── frame.rst
│ ├── general_functions.rst
│ ├── groupby.rst
│ ├── index.rst
│ ├── indexing.rst
│ ├── io.rst
│ ├── ml.rst
│ ├── series.rst
│ └── window.rst
├── pyspark.resource.rst
├── pyspark.rst
├── pyspark.sql.rst
├── pyspark.ss.rst
└── pyspark.streaming.rst
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To make the directory structure easier to follow.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually built and tested the docs.
Closes#32812 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35646-followup.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Introduces `InternalField` to manage dtypes and `StructField`s.
`InternalFrame` is already managing dtypes, but when it checks the Spark's data types, column names, and nullabilities, it tries to run the analysis phase each time it needs, which will cause a performance issue.
It will use `InternalField` class which stores the retrieved Spark's data types, column names, and nullabilities, and reuse them. Also, in case those can be known, just update and reuse them without asking Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently there are some performance issues in the pandas-on-Spark layer.
One of them is accessing Java DataFrame and run analysis phase too many times, especially just for retrieving the current column names or data types.
We should reduce the amount of unnecessary access.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Improves the performance in pandas-on-Spark layer:
```py
df = ps.read_parquet("/path/to/test.parquet") # contains ~75 columns
df = df[(df["col"] > 0) & (df["col"] < 10000)]
```
Before the PR, it took about **2.15 sec** and after **1.15 sec**.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32775 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35638/field.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Introduce BooleanExtensionOps in order to make boolean operators `and` and `or` data-type-based.
- Improve error messages for operators `and` and `or`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Boolean operators __and__, __or__, __rand__, and __ror__ should be data-type-based
BooleanExtensionDtypes processes these boolean operators differently from bool, so BooleanExtensionOps is introduced.
These boolean operators themselves are also bitwise operators, which should be able to apply to other data types classes later. However, this is not the goal of this PR.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Error messages for operators `and` and `or` are improved.
Before:
```
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, "x", "y"], dtype="category")
>>> psser | True
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
pyspark.sql.utils.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '(`0` OR true)' due to data type mismatch: differing types in '(`0` OR true)' (tinyint and boolean).;
'Project [unresolvedalias(CASE WHEN (isnull(0#9) OR isnull((0#9 OR true))) THEN false ELSE (0#9 OR true) END, Some(org.apache.spark.sql.Column$$Lambda$1442/17254916406fb8afba))]
+- Project [__index_level_0__#8L, 0#9, monotonically_increasing_id() AS __natural_order__#12L]
+- LogicalRDD [__index_level_0__#8L, 0#9], false
```
After:
```
>>> psser = ps.Series([1, "x", "y"], dtype="category")
>>> psser | True
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Bitwise or can not be applied to categoricals.
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32698 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_extension.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make the conversion from/to pandas (for non-ExtensionDtype) data-type-based.
NOTE: Ops class per ExtensionDtype and its data-type-based from/to pandas will be implemented in a separate PR as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35614.
### Why are the changes needed?
The conversion from/to pandas includes logic for checking data types and behaving accordingly.
That makes code hard to change or maintain.
Since we have introduced the Ops class per non-ExtensionDtype data type, we ought to make the conversion from/to pandas data-type-based for non-ExtensionDtypes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32592 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_pd_conversion.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to change from:
to:
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas APIs on Spark (pandas on Spark) is a package in PySpark in the end. So it has to be documented in the same level with other packages (e.g., Spark SQL).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it changes the structure of the docs. To end users, no as it's only in development branch.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested as above.
Closes#32799 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35646.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adjust the `check_exact` parameter for non-numeric columns to ensure pandas-on-Spark tests passed with all pandas versions.
### Why are the changes needed?
`pd.testing` utils are utilized in pandas-on-Spark tests.
Due to https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/35446, `check_exact=True` for non-numeric columns doesn't work for older pd.testing utils, e.g. `assert_series_equal`. We wanted to adjust that to ensure pandas-on-Spark tests pass for all pandas versions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#32772 from xinrong-databricks/test_util.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes applying `black` to pandas API on Spark codes, for improving static analysis.
By executing the `./dev/reformat-python` in the spark home directory, all the code of the pandas API on Spark is fixed according to the static analysis rules.
### Why are the changes needed?
This can be reduces the cost of static analysis during development.
It has been used continuously for about a year in the Koalas project and its convenience has been proven.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, it's dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually reformat the pandas API on Spark codes by running the `./dev/reformat-python`, and checked the `./dev/lint-python` is passed.
Closes#32779 from itholic/SPARK-35499.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In functions.py, there is a function added `def column(col)`. There is also another method in the same file `def col(col)`. This leads to some ambiguity on whether the parameter is being referred to or the function. In pyspark 3.1.2, this leads to `TypeError: 'str' object is not callable` when the function `column(col)` is called - the highest preference is given to the string variable in scope as opposed to the function `col `in the file as intended.
This PR fixes that ambiguity by changing the variable name to `col_like`. I have filed this as an issue on JIRA here - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35643.
### Why are the changes needed?
In pyspark 3.1.2, we see `TypeError: 'str' object is not callable` when `column()` function is called. This Pr fixes that error.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
I don't believe this patch needs additional testing.
Closes#32771 from keerthanvasist/col.
Lead-authored-by: Keerthan Vasist <kvasist@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: keerthanvasist <kvasist@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to port Koalas documentation to PySpark documentation as its initial step.
It ports almost as is except these differences:
- Renamed import from `databricks.koalas` to `pyspark.pandas`.
- Renamed `to_koalas` -> `to_pandas_on_spark`
- Renamed `(Series|DataFrame).koalas` -> `(Series|DataFrame).pandas_on_spark`
- Added a `ps_` prefix in the RST file names of Koalas documentation
Other then that,
- Excluded `python/docs/build/html` in linter
- Fixed GA dependency installataion
### Why are the changes needed?
To document pandas APIs on Spark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it adds new documentations.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually built the docs and checked the output.
Closes#32726 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35587.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes adding the missing link to Data Source Option page, for related functions such as `to_csv`, `to_json`, `from_csv`, `from_json`, `schema_of_csv`, `schema_of_json`.
- Before
<img width="797" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-03 at 11 39 17 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44108233/120578877-7b092200-c461-11eb-9e24-bd5349445c66.png">
- After
<img width="776" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-03 at 11 59 14 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44108233/120579868-29fa2d80-c463-11eb-9329-bd6c8f068f5b.png">
### Why are the changes needed?
To provide users available options in detail with the proper documentation link.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the link to Data Source Options page is added to the API documentations, as shown in the above screen capture.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually built the docs and checked one by one.
Closes#32762 from itholic/SPARK-35081.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes restoring `to_koalas` to keep the backward compatibility, with throwing deprecated warning.
### Why are the changes needed?
If we remove `to_koalas`, the existing Koalas codes that include `to_koalas` wouldn't work.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. It's restoring the existing functionality.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested in local.
```shell
>>> sdf.to_koalas()
.../spark/python/pyspark/pandas/frame.py:4550: FutureWarning: DataFrame.to_koalas is deprecated as of DataFrame.to_pandas_on_spark. Please use the API instead.
warnings.warn(
```
Closes#32729 from itholic/SPARK-35539.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support arithmetic operations against bool IndexOpsMixin.
### Why are the changes needed?
Existing binary operations of bool IndexOpsMixin in Koalas do not match pandas’ behaviors.
pandas take True as 1, False as 0 when dealing with numeric values, numeric collections, and numeric Series/Index; whereas Koalas raises an AnalysisException no matter what the binary operation is.
We aim to match pandas' behaviors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([True, True, False])
>>> psser + 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Addition can not be applied to booleans.
>>> 1 + psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Addition can not be applied to booleans.
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> psser + ps.Series([1, 2, 3])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Addition can not be applied to booleans.
>>> ps.Series([1, 2, 3]) + psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: addition can not be applied to given types.
```
After the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([True, True, False])
>>> psser + 1
0 2
1 2
2 1
dtype: int64
>>> 1 + psser
0 2
1 2
2 1
dtype: int64
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> psser + ps.Series([1, 2, 3])
0 2
1 3
2 3
dtype: int64
>>> ps.Series([1, 2, 3]) + psser
0 2
1 3
2 3
dtype: int64
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32611 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_arith_bool.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to move `# noqa` in the Python docstring to the proper place so that hide them from the official documents.
### Why are the changes needed?
If we don't move `# noqa` to the proper place, it is exposed in the middle of the docstring, and it looks a bit wired as below:
<img width="613" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-01 at 3 17 52 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44108233/120275617-91da3800-c2ec-11eb-9778-16c5fe789418.png">
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the `# noqa` is no more shown in the documents as below:
<img width="609" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-01 at 3 21 00 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44108233/120275927-fbf2dd00-c2ec-11eb-950d-346af2745711.png">
### How was this patch tested?
Manually build docs and check.
Closes#32728 from itholic/SPARK-35582.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes renaming the existing "Koalas Accessor" to "Pandas API on Spark Accessor".
### Why are the changes needed?
Because we don't use name "Koalas" anymore, rather use "Pandas API on Spark".
So, the related code bases are all need to be changed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the usage of pandas API on Spark accessor is changed from `df.koalas.[...]`. to `df.pandas_on_spark.[...]`.
**Note:** `df.koalas.[...]` is still available but with deprecated warnings.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested in local and checked one by one.
Closes#32674 from itholic/SPARK-35453.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix and reenable `test_stats_on_non_numeric_columns_should_be_discarded_if_numeric_only_is_true` that was disabled when we upgrade Python 3.9 in CI at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32657.
Seems like this is because of the latest NumPy's behaviour change, see also `https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/16273#discussion_r641264085`.
pandas inherits this behaviour but it doesn't make sense when `numeric_only` is set to `True` in pandas. I will track and follow the status of the issue between pandas and NumPy.
For the time being, I propose to exclude boolean case alone in percentile/quartile test case
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep the test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
I roughly locally tested. But it should pass in CI.
Closes#32690 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35510.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Re-enable some pandas-on-Spark test cases.
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas version in GitHub Actions is upgraded now so we can re-enable some pandas-on-Spark test cases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32682 from xinrong-databricks/enable_tests.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Introduce a util function `spark_column_equals` to check the underlying expressions of columns are the same or not.
### Why are the changes needed?
In pandas on Spark, there are some places checking the underlying expressions of columns are the same or not, but it's done one-by-one.
We should introduce a util function for it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.
Closes#32680 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35537/spark_column_equals.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
BinaryType, which represents byte sequence values in Spark, doesn't support data-type-based operations yet. We are going to introduce BinaryOps for it.
### Why are the changes needed?
The data-type-based-operations class should be set for each individual data type, including BinaryType.
In addition, BinaryType has its special way of addition, which means concatenation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([b'1', b'2', b'3'])
>>> psser + psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
>>> psser + b'1'
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
```
After the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([b'1', b'2', b'3'])
>>> psser + psser
0 [49, 49]
1 [50, 50]
2 [51, 51]
dtype: object
>>> psser + b'1'
0 [49, 49]
1 [50, 49]
2 [51, 49]
dtype: object
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32665 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_binary.
Lead-authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: xinrong-databricks <47337188+xinrong-databricks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed to introduce ArrayOps, MapOps and StructOps to handle data-type-based operations for StructType, ArrayType, and MapType separately.
### Why are the changes needed?
StructType, ArrayType, and MapType are not accepted by DataTypeOps now.
We should handle these complex types. Among them:
- ArrayType supports concatenation: for example, ps.Series([[1,2,3]]) + ps.Series([[4,5,6]]) should work the same as pd.Series([[1,2,3]]) + pd.Series([[4,5,6]]), as concatenation.
- StructOps will be helpful to make to/from pandas conversion data-type-based.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[0.4, 0.5]])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[4, 5]])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([['x']])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
```
After the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[0.4, 0.5]])
0 [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 0.4, 0.5]
dtype: object
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[4, 5]])
0 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
dtype: object
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([['x']])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Concatenation can only be applied to arrays of the same type
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32626 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_complex.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use a proper built-in exceptions instead of the plain `Exception` in Python.
While I am here, I fixed another minor issue at `DataFrams.schema` together:
```diff
- except AttributeError as e:
- raise Exception(
- "Unable to parse datatype from schema. %s" % e)
+ except Exception as e:
+ raise ValueError(
+ "Unable to parse datatype from schema. %s" % e) from e
```
Now it catches all exceptions during schema parsing, chains the exception with `ValueError`. Previously it only caught `AttributeError` that does not catch all cases.
### Why are the changes needed?
For users to expect the proper exceptions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yeah, the exception classes became different but should be compatible because previous exception was plain `Exception` which other exceptions inherit.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unittests should cover,
Closes#31238Closes#32650 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-32194.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables GitHub Actions to test PySpark with Python 3.9.
### Why are the changes needed?
To verify the support of Python 3.9.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover.
Closes#32657 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35506.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes APIs which have been deprecated in Koalas.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are some APIs that have been deprecated in Koalas. We shouldn't have those in pandas APIs on Spark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the APIs deprecated in Koalas will be no longer available.
### How was this patch tested?
Modified some tests which use the deprecated APIs, and the other existing tests should pass.
Closes#32656 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35505/remove_deprecated.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables plot tests with plotly
```bash
./python/run-tests --python-executables=python3 --modules=pyspark-pandas
```
**Before**:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/.../miniconda3/envs/python3.8/lib/python3.8/runpy.py", line 194, in _run_module_as_main
return _run_code(code, main_globals, None,
File "/.../miniconda3/envs/python3.8/lib/python3.8/runpy.py", line 87, in _run_code
exec(code, run_globals)
File "/.../pyspark/pandas/tests/plot/test_frame_plot_plotly.py", line 42, in <module>
plotly_requirement_message + " Or pandas<1.0; pandas<1.0 does not support latest plotly "
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'str'
```
**After**:
```
...
Starting test(python3): pyspark.pandas.tests.plot.test_series_plot_plotly
...
Finished test(python3): pyspark.pandas.tests.plot.test_series_plot_plotly (23s)
...
Tests passed in 1296 seconds
```
### Why are the changes needed?
For test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the tests.
Closes#32649 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35497.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add thread target wrapper API for pyspark pin thread mode.
### Why are the changes needed?
A helper method which make user easier to write threading code under pin thread mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Closes#32644 from WeichenXu123/add_thread_target_wrapper_api.
Authored-by: Weichen Xu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds more type annotations in the files:
- `python/pyspark/pandas/spark/accessors.py`
- `python/pyspark/pandas/typedef/typehints.py`
- `python/pyspark/pandas/utils.py`
and fixes the mypy check failures.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should enable more `disallow_untyped_defs` mypy checks.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
This PR adds more type annotations in pandas APIs on Spark module, which can impact interaction with development tools for users.
### How was this patch tested?
The mypy check with a new configuration and existing tests should pass.
Closes#32627 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35467_35468_35477/disallow_untyped_defs.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Sets up the `mypy` configuration to enable `disallow_untyped_defs` check for pandas APIs on Spark module.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently many functions in the main codes in pandas APIs on Spark module are still missing type annotations and disabled `mypy` check `disallow_untyped_defs`.
We should add more type annotations and enable the mypy check.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
This PR adds more type annotations in pandas APIs on Spark module, which can impact interaction with development tools for users.
### How was this patch tested?
The mypy check with a new configuration and existing tests should pass.
Closes#32614 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35465/disallow_untyped_defs.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are still naming related to Koalas in test and function name. This PR addressed them to fit pandas-on-spark.
- kdf -> psdf
- kser -> psser
- kidx -> psidx
- kmidx -> psmidx
- to_koalas() -> to_pandas_on_spark()
### Why are the changes needed?
This is because the name Koalas is no longer used in PySpark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`to_koalas()` function is renamed to `to_pandas_on_spark()`
### How was this patch tested?
Tested in local manually.
After changing the related naming, I checked them one by one.
Closes#32516 from itholic/SPARK-35364.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed for **pandas APIs on Spark**, in order to separate arithmetic operations shown as below into data-type-based structures.
`__add__, __sub__, __mul__, __truediv__, __floordiv__, __pow__, __mod__,
__radd__, __rsub__, __rmul__, __rtruediv__, __rfloordiv__, __rpow__,__rmod__`
DataTypeOps and subclasses are introduced.
The existing behaviors of each arithmetic operation should be preserved.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the same arithmetic operation of all data types is defined in one function, so it’s difficult to extend the behavior change based on the data types.
Introducing DataTypeOps would be the foundation for [pandas APIs on Spark: Separate basic operations into data type based structures.](https://docs.google.com/document/d/12MS6xK0hETYmrcl5b9pX5lgV4FmGVfpmcSKq--_oQlc/edit?usp=sharing).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Tests are introduced under pyspark.pandas.tests.data_type_ops. One test file per DataTypeOps class.
Closes#32596 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_arith_fix.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoids using f-string format that's a new feature in Python 3.6. Although it's legitimate to use this syntax because Apache Spark supports Python 3.6+, this breaks unofficial support of Python 3.5.
This specific f-string format looks something unnecessary, and doesn't look worth enough to remove such unofficial support because of one string format in an error message.
**NOTE** that this PR doesn't mean that we're maintaining Python 3.5 since we dropped. It just looks like too much to remove that unofficial support only because of one string format and error message.
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep unofficial Python 3.5 support
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Officially nope.
### How was this patch tested?
Ran the linters.
Closes#32598 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35408=followup.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed for **pandas APIs on Spark**, in order to separate arithmetic operations shown as below into data-type-based structures.
`__add__, __sub__, __mul__, __truediv__, __floordiv__, __pow__, __mod__,
__radd__, __rsub__, __rmul__, __rtruediv__, __rfloordiv__, __rpow__,__rmod__`
DataTypeOps and subclasses are introduced.
The existing behaviors of each arithmetic operation should be preserved.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the same arithmetic operation of all data types is defined in one function, so it’s difficult to extend the behavior change based on the data types.
Introducing DataTypeOps would be the foundation for [pandas APIs on Spark: Separate basic operations into data type based structures.](https://docs.google.com/document/d/12MS6xK0hETYmrcl5b9pX5lgV4FmGVfpmcSKq--_oQlc/edit?usp=sharing).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Tests are introduced under pyspark.pandas.tests.data_type_ops. One test file per DataTypeOps class.
Closes#32469 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_arith.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `sentences`, a string function, which is present as of `2.0.0` but missing in `functions.{scala,py}`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This function can be only used from SQL for now.
It's good if we can use this function from Scala/Python code as well as SQL.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Users can use this function from Scala and Python.
### How was this patch tested?
New test.
Closes#32566 from sarutak/sentences-function.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30309 added a configuration (disabled by default) that simplifies the error messages from Python UDFS, which removed internal stacktrace from Python workers:
```python
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf; spark.range(10).select(udf(lambda x: x/0)("id")).collect()
```
**Before**
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 427, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20, vertical))
File "/.../python/lib/py4j-0.10.9-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1305, in __call__
File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 127, in deco
raise_from(converted)
File "<string>", line 3, in raise_from
pyspark.sql.utils.PythonException:
An exception was thrown from Python worker in the executor:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 605, in main
process()
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 597, in process
serializer.dump_stream(out_iter, outfile)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/serializers.py", line 223, in dump_stream
self.serializer.dump_stream(self._batched(iterator), stream)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/serializers.py", line 141, in dump_stream
for obj in iterator:
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/serializers.py", line 212, in _batched
for item in iterator:
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 450, in mapper
result = tuple(f(*[a[o] for o in arg_offsets]) for (arg_offsets, f) in udfs)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 450, in <genexpr>
result = tuple(f(*[a[o] for o in arg_offsets]) for (arg_offsets, f) in udfs)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 90, in <lambda>
return lambda *a: f(*a)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/util.py", line 107, in wrapper
return f(*args, **kwargs)
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <lambda>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero
```
**After**
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 427, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20, vertical))
File "/.../python/lib/py4j-0.10.9-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1305, in __call__
File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 127, in deco
raise_from(converted)
File "<string>", line 3, in raise_from
pyspark.sql.utils.PythonException:
An exception was thrown from Python worker in the executor:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <lambda>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero
```
Note that the traceback (`return f(*args, **kwargs)`) is almost always same - I would say more than 99%. For 1% case, we can guide developers to enable this configuration for further debugging.
In Databricks, it has been enabled for around 6 months, and I have had zero negative feedback on it.
### Why are the changes needed?
To show simplified exception messages to end users.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it will hide the internal Python worker traceback.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases should cover.
Closes#32569 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35419.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes `mypy` errors and enables `mypy` check for pandas-on-Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
The `mypy` check for pandas-on-Spark was disabled when the initial porting.
It should be enabled again; otherwise we will miss type checking errors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
The enabled `mypy` check and existing unit tests should pass.
Closes#32540 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-34941/pandas_mypy.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Provide clearer error message tied to the user's Python code if incorrect parameters are passed to `DataFrame.show` rather than the message about a missing JVM method the user is not calling directly.
```
py4j.Py4JException: Method showString([class java.lang.Boolean, class java.lang.Integer, class java.lang.Boolean]) does not exist
at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.getMethod(ReflectionEngine.java:318)
at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.getMethod(ReflectionEngine.java:326)
at py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:274)
at py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:132)
at py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
at py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:238)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748
```
### Why are the changes needed?
For faster debugging through actionable error message.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No change for the correct parameters but different error messages for the parameters triggering an exception.
### How was this patch tested?
- unit test
- manually in PySpark REPL
Closes#32555 from gerashegalov/df_show_validation.
Authored-by: Gera Shegalov <gera@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add required imports to Pyspark ML examples in CrossValidator, TrainValidationSplit
### Why are the changes needed?
The examples pass doctests because of previous imports, but as they appear in Pyspark documentation, are incomplete. The additional imports are required to make the example work.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, docs only change.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32554 from srowen/TuningImports.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes the check of `summary.logLikelihood` in ml/clustering.py - this GMM test is quite flaky. It fails easily e.g., if:
- change number of partitions;
- just change the way to compute the sum of weights;
- change the underlying BLAS impl
Also uses more permissive precision on `Word2Vec` test case.
### Why are the changes needed?
To recover the build and tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases.
Closes#32533 from zhengruifeng/SPARK_35392_disable_flaky_gmm_test.
Lead-authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the same issue as #32424.
```py
from pyspark.sql.functions import flatten, struct, transform
df = spark.sql("SELECT array(1, 2, 3) as numbers, array('a', 'b', 'c') as letters")
df.select(flatten(
transform(
"numbers",
lambda number: transform(
"letters",
lambda letter: struct(number.alias("n"), letter.alias("l"))
)
)
).alias("zipped")).show(truncate=False)
```
**Before:**
```
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|zipped |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|[{a, a}, {b, b}, {c, c}, {a, a}, {b, b}, {c, c}, {a, a}, {b, b}, {c, c}]|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
**After:**
```
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|zipped |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|[{1, a}, {1, b}, {1, c}, {2, a}, {2, b}, {2, c}, {3, a}, {3, b}, {3, c}]|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To produce the correct results.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it fixes the results to be correct as mentioned above.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test as well as manually.
Closes#32523 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35382/nested_higher_order_functions.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use full names of modules in `install.rst` when specifying dependencies.
### Why are the changes needed?
Using full names makes it more clear.
In addition, `pandas APIs on Spark` as a new module can start to be recognized by more people.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manual verification.
Closes#32427 from xinrong-databricks/nameDoc.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Port Koalas dependencies appropriately to PySpark dependencies.
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas-on-Spark has its own required dependency and optional dependencies.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manual test.
Closes#32386 from xinrong-databricks/portDeps.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The parameter **no_implicit_optional** is defined twice in the mypy configuration, [ligne 20](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/mypy.ini#L20) and ligne 105.
### Why are the changes needed?
We would like to keep the mypy configuration clean.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
This patch can be tested with `dev/lint-python`
Closes#32418 from garawalid/feature/clean-mypy-config.
Authored-by: garawalid <gwalid94@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is rather a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30518 that should be ported back to `branch-3.1` too.
`STOP_AT_DELIMITER` was mistakenly used twice. The duplicated `STOP_AT_DELIMITER` should be `SKIP_VALUE` in the documentation.
### Why are the changes needed?
To correctly document.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it fixes the user-facing documentation.
### How was this patch tested?
I checked them via running linters.
Closes#32423 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35250.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR corrects some exception type when the function input params are failed to validate due to TypeError.
In order to convenient to review, there are 3 commits in this PR:
- Standardize input validation error type on sql
- Standardize input validation error type on ml
- Standardize input validation error type on pandas
### Why are the changes needed?
As suggestion from Python exception doc [1]: "Raised when an operation or function is applied to an object of inappropriate type.", but there are many Value error are raised in some pyspark code, this patch fix them.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html#TypeError
Note that: this patch only addresses the exsiting some wrong raise type for input validation, the input validation decorator/framework which mentioned in [SPARK-35176](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35176), would be submited in a speparated patch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, code can raise the right TypeError instead of ValueError.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing test case and UT
Closes#32368 from Yikun/SPARK-35176.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds a note for aarch64 user to install the specific pyarrow>=4.0.0.
### Why are the changes needed?
The pyarrow aarch64 support is [introduced](https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9285) in [PyArrow 4.0.0](https://github.com/apache/arrow/releases/tag/apache-arrow-4.0.0), and it has been published 27.Apr.2021.
See more in [SPARK-34979](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34979).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, this doc can help user install arrow on aarch64.
### How was this patch tested?
doc test passed.
Closes#32363 from Yikun/SPARK-34979.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
There are two types of dense vectors:
* pyspark.ml.linalg.DenseVector
* pyspark.mllib.linalg.DenseVector
In spark-3.1.1, array_to_vector returns instances of pyspark.ml.linalg.DenseVector.
The documentation is ambiguous & can lead to the false conclusion that instances of
pyspark.mllib.linalg.DenseVector will be returned.
Conversion from ml versions to mllib versions can easly be achieved with
mlutils.convertVectorColumnsToML helper.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make documentation more explicit
### Why are the changes needed?
The documentation is a bit misleading and users can lose time investigating & realizing there are two DenseVector types.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No test were run as only the documentation was changed
Closes#32255 from jlafaye/master.
Authored-by: Julien Lafaye <jlafaye@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, remove existing agg, and use a new agg supporting virtual centering
2, add related testsuites
### Why are the changes needed?
centering vectors should accelerate convergence, and generate solution more close to R
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
updated testsuites and added testsuites
Closes#32124 from zhengruifeng/svc_agg_refactor.
Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes PySpark version dependent codes from pyspark.pandas test codes.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are several places to check the PySpark version and switch the logic, but now those are not necessary.
We should remove them.
We will do the same thing after we finish porting tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32300 from xinrong-databricks/port.rmv_spark_version_chk_in_tests.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Consolidate PySpark testing utils by removing `python/pyspark/pandas/testing`, and then creating a file `pandasutils` under `python/pyspark/testing` for test utilities used in `pyspark/pandas`.
### Why are the changes needed?
`python/pyspark/pandas/testing` hold test utilites for pandas-on-spark, and `python/pyspark/testing` contain test utilities for pyspark. Consolidating them makes code cleaner and easier to maintain.
Updated import statements are as shown below:
- from pyspark.testing.sqlutils import SQLTestUtils
- from pyspark.testing.pandasutils import PandasOnSparkTestCase, TestUtils
(PandasOnSparkTestCase is the original ReusedSQLTestCase in `python/pyspark/pandas/testing/utils.py`)
Minor improvements include:
- Usage of missing library's requirement_message
- `except ImportError` rather than `except`
- import pyspark.pandas alias as `ps` rather than `pp`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests under python/pyspark/pandas/tests.
Closes#32177 from xinrong-databricks/port.merge_utils.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes incorrect return type for `rawPredictionUDF` in `OneVsRestModel`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Bugfix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#32245 from harupy/SPARK-35142.
Authored-by: harupy <17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some more changes in Koalas such as [databricks/koalas#2141](c8f803d6be), [databricks/koalas#2143](913d68868d) after the main code porting, this PR is to synchronize those changes with the `pyspark.pandas`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should port the whole Koalas codes into PySpark and synchronize them.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Fixed some incompatible behavior with pandas 1.2.0 and added more to the `to_markdown` docstring.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested in local.
Closes#32197 from itholic/SPARK-34995-fix.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that we merged the Koalas main code into the PySpark code base (#32036), we should port the Koalas Index unit tests to PySpark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the pandas-on-Spark modules are not tested fully. We should enable the Index unit tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Enable Index unit tests.
Closes#32139 from xinrong-databricks/port.indexes_tests.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are some more changes in Koalas such as [databricks/koalas#2141](c8f803d6be), [databricks/koalas#2143](913d68868d) after the main code porting, this PR is to synchronize those changes with the `pyspark.pandas`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should port the whole Koalas codes into PySpark and synchronize them.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Fixed some incompatible behavior with pandas 1.2.0 and added more to the `to_markdown` docstring.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested in local.
Closes#32154 from itholic/SPARK-34995.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to rename Koalas to pandas-on-Spark in main codes
### Why are the changes needed?
To have the correct name in PySpark. NOTE that the official name in the main documentation will be pandas APIs on Spark to be extra clear. pandas-on-Spark is not the official term.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, it's master-only change. It changes the docstring and class names.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested via:
```bash
./python/run-tests --python-executable=python3 --modules pyspark-pandas
```
Closes#32166 from HyukjinKwon/rename-koalas.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that we merged the Koalas main code into the PySpark code base (#32036), we should port the Koalas miscellaneous unit tests to PySpark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the pandas-on-Spark modules are not tested fully. We should enable miscellaneous unit tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Enable miscellaneous unit tests.
Closes#32152 from xinrong-databricks/port.misc_tests.
Lead-authored-by: xinrong-databricks <47337188+xinrong-databricks@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch add `__version__` into pyspark.__init__.__all__ to make the `__version__` as exported explicitly, see more in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32110#issuecomment-817331896
### Why are the changes needed?
1. make the `__version__` as exported explicitly
2. cleanup `noqa: F401` on `__version`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Python related CI passed
Closes#32125 from Yikun/SPARK-34629-Follow.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zero323 <mszymkiewicz@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes PySpark version dependent codes from `pyspark.pandas` main codes.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are several places to check the PySpark version and switch the logic, but now those are not necessary.
We should remove them.
We will do the same thing after we finish porting tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32138 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35039/pyspark_version.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that we merged the Koalas main code into the PySpark code base (#32036), we should port the Koalas internal implementation unit tests to PySpark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the pandas-on-Spark modules are not tested fully. We should enable the internal implementation unit tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Enable internal implementation unit tests.
Closes#32137 from xinrong-databricks/port.test_internal_impl.
Lead-authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: xinrong-databricks <47337188+xinrong-databricks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that we merged the Koalas main code into the PySpark code base (#32036), we should port the Koalas plot unit tests to PySpark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the pandas-on-Spark modules are not tested fully. We should enable the plot unit tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Enable plot unit tests.
Closes#32151 from xinrong-databricks/port.plot_tests.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a new line to the `lineSep` parameter so that the doc renders correctly.
### Why are the changes needed?
> <img width="608" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8269566/114631408-5c608900-9c71-11eb-8ded-ae1e21ae48b2.png">
The first line of the description is part of the signature and is **bolded**.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it changes how the docs for `pyspark.sql.DataFrameWriter.json` are rendered.
### How was this patch tested?
I didn't test it; I don't have the doc rendering tool chain on my machine, but the change is obvious.
Closes#32153 from AlexMooney/patch-1.
Authored-by: Alex Mooney <alexmooney@fastmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that we merged the Koalas main code into the PySpark code base (#32036), we should port the Koalas DataFrame-related unit tests to PySpark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the pandas-on-Spark modules are not fully tested. We should enable the DataFrame-related unit tests first.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Enable DataFrame-related unit tests.
Closes#32131 from xinrong-databricks/port.test_dataframe_related.
Lead-authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: xinrong-databricks <47337188+xinrong-databricks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that we merged the Koalas main code into the PySpark code base (#32036), we should port the Koalas Series related unit tests to PySpark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the pandas-on-Spark modules are not fully tested. We should enable the Series related unit tests first.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Enable Series-related unit tests.
Closes#32117 from xinrong-databricks/port.test_series_related.
Lead-authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: xinrong-databricks <47337188+xinrong-databricks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that we merged the Koalas main code into the PySpark code base (#32036), we should port the Koalas operations on different frames unit tests to PySpark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the pandas-on-Spark modules are not tested fully. We should enable the operations on different frames unit tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Enable operations on different frames unit tests.
Closes#32133 from xinrong-databricks/port.test_ops_on_diff_frames.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix type hints mismatches in pyspark.sql.*
### Why are the changes needed?
There were some mismatches in pyspark.sql.*
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
dev/lint-python passed.
Closes#32122 from Yikun/SPARK-35019.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix:
```python
import pyspark.pandas as pp
```
to
```python
import pyspark.pandas as ps
```
### Why are the changes needed?
`pp` might sound offensive in some contexts.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The change is in master only. We'll use `ps` as the short name instead of `pp`.
### How was this patch tested?
The CI in this PR will test it out.
Closes#32108 from LSturtew/renaming_pyspark.pandas.
Authored-by: Luka Sturtewagen <luka.sturtewagen@linkit.nl>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up of #32069.
Makes some doctests which could be flaky skip.
### Why are the changes needed?
Some doctests in `pyspark.pandas` module enabled at #32069 could be flaky because the result row order is nondeterministic.
- groupby-apply with UDF which has a return type annotation will lose its index.
- `Index.symmetric_difference` uses `DataFrame.intersect` and `subtract` internally.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32116 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-34972/fix_flaky_tests.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the typehint of pyspark.__version__, which was mentioned in [SPARK-34630](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34630).
### Why are the changes needed?
There were some short discussion happened in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31823#discussion_r593830911 .
After further deep investigation on [1][2], we can see the `pyspark.__version__` is added by [setup.py](c06758834e/python/setup.py (L201)), it makes `__version__` embedded into pyspark module, that means the `__init__.pyi` is the right place to add the typehint for `__version__`.
So, this patch adds the type hint `__version__` in pyspark/__init__.pyi.
[1] [PEP-396 Module Version Numbers](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0396/)
[2] https://packaging.python.org/guides/single-sourcing-package-version/
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
1. Disable the ignore_error on
ee7bf7d962/python/mypy.ini (L132)
2. Run mypy:
- Before fix
```shell
(venv) ➜ spark git:(SPARK-34629) ✗ mypy --config-file python/mypy.ini python/pyspark | grep version
python/pyspark/pandas/spark/accessors.py:884: error: Module has no attribute "__version__"
```
- After fix
```shell
(venv) ➜ spark git:(SPARK-34629) ✗ mypy --config-file python/mypy.ini python/pyspark | grep version
```
no output
Closes#32110 from Yikun/SPARK-34629.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that we merged the Koalas main code into the PySpark code base (#32036), we should port the Koalas DataFrame unit test to PySpark.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the pandas-on-Spark modules are not tested at all. We should enable the DataFrame unit test first.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Enable the DataFrame unit test.
Closes#32083 from xinrong-databricks/port.test_dataframe.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now that we merged the Koalas main code into PySpark code base (#32036), we should enable doctests on the Spark's infrastructure.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently the pandas-on-Spark modules are not tested at all.
We should enable doctests first, and we will port other unit tests separately later.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Enabled the whole doctests.
Closes#32069 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-34972/pyspark-pandas_doctests.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch add the `-fr` argument to `xargs rm`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This cmd is unavailable in basic case. If the find command does not get any search results, the rm command is invoked with an empty argument list, and then we will get a `rm: missing operand` and break, then the coverage report does not generate.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
python/run-tests-with-coverage --testnames pyspark.sql.tests.test_arrow --python-executables=python
The coverage report result is generated without break.
Closes#32064 from Yikun/patch-1.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As a first step of [SPARK-34849](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34849), this PR proposes porting the Koalas main code into PySpark.
This PR contains minimal changes to the existing Koalas code as follows:
1. `databricks.koalas` -> `pyspark.pandas`
2. `from databricks import koalas as ks` -> `from pyspark import pandas as pp`
3. `ks.xxx -> pp.xxx`
Other than them:
1. Added a line to `python/mypy.ini` in order to ignore the mypy test. See related issue at [SPARK-34941](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34941).
2. Added a comment to several lines in several files to ignore the flake8 F401. See related issue at [SPARK-34943](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34943).
When this PR is merged, all the features that were previously used in [Koalas](https://github.com/databricks/koalas) will be available in PySpark as well.
Users can access to the pandas API in PySpark as below:
```python
>>> from pyspark import pandas as pp
>>> ppdf = pp.DataFrame({"A": [1, 2, 3], "B": [15, 20, 25]})
>>> ppdf
A B
0 1 15
1 2 20
2 3 25
```
The existing "options and settings" in Koalas are also available in the same way:
```python
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option, reset_option, get_option
>>> ppser1 = pp.Series([1, 2, 3])
>>> ppser2 = pp.Series([3, 4, 5])
>>> ppser1 + ppser2
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: Cannot combine the series or dataframe because it comes from a different dataframe. In order to allow this operation, enable 'compute.ops_on_diff_frames' option.
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> ppser1 + ppser2
0 4
1 6
2 8
dtype: int64
```
Please also refer to the [API Reference](https://koalas.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/index.html) and [Options and Settings](https://koalas.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/options.html) for more detail.
**NOTE** that this PR intentionally ports the main codes of Koalas first almost as are with minimal changes because:
- Koalas project is fairly large. Making some changes together for PySpark will make it difficult to review the individual change.
Koalas dev includes multiple Spark committers who will review. By doing this, the committers will be able to more easily and effectively review and drive the development.
- Koalas tests and documentation require major changes to make it look great together with PySpark whereas main codes do not require.
- We lately froze the Koalas codebase, and plan to work together on the initial porting. By porting the main codes first as are, it unblocks the Koalas dev to work on other items in parallel.
I promise and will make sure on:
- Rename Koalas to PySpark pandas APIs and/or pandas-on-Spark accordingly in documentation, and the docstrings and comments in the main codes.
- Triage APIs to remove that don’t make sense when Koalas is in PySpark
The documentation changes will be tracked in [SPARK-34885](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34885), the test code changes will be tracked in [SPARK-34886](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34886).
### Why are the changes needed?
Please refer to:
- [[DISCUSS] Support pandas API layer on PySpark](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Support-pandas-API-layer-on-PySpark-td30945.html)
- [[VOTE] SPIP: Support pandas API layer on PySpark](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-SPIP-Support-pandas-API-layer-on-PySpark-td30996.html)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now users can use the pandas APIs on Spark
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested for exposed major APIs and options as described above.
### Koalas contributors
Koalas would not have been possible without the following contributors:
ueshin
HyukjinKwon
rxin
xinrong-databricks
RainFung
charlesdong1991
harupy
floscha
beobest2
thunterdb
garawalid
LucasG0
shril
deepyaman
gioa
fwani
90jam
thoo
AbdealiJK
abishekganesh72
gliptak
DumbMachine
dvgodoy
stbof
nitlev
hjoo
gatorsmile
tomspur
icexelloss
awdavidson
guyao
akhilputhiry
scook12
patryk-oleniuk
tracek
dennyglee
athena15
gstaubli
WeichenXu123
hsubbaraj
lfdversluis
ktksq
shengjh
margaret-databricks
LSturtew
sllynn
manuzhang
jijosg
sadikovi
Closes#32036 from itholic/SPARK-34890.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR replaces the non-ASCII characters to ASCII characters when possible in PySpark documentation
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid unnecessarily using other non-ASCII characters which could lead to the issue such as https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32047 or https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22782
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Virtually no.
### How was this patch tested?
Found via (Mac OS):
```bash
# In Spark root directory
cd python
pcregrep --color='auto' -n "[\x80-\xFF]" `git ls-files .`
```
Closes#32048 from HyukjinKwon/minor-fix.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As a followup for #29818, document caveats of using the Arrow selfDestruct option in toPandas, which include:
- toPandas() may be slower;
- the resulting dataframe may not support some Pandas operations due to immutable backing arrays.
### Why are the changes needed?
This will hopefully reduce user confusion as with SPARK-34463.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes - documentation is updated and a config setting description is updated to clearly indicate the config is experimental.
### How was this patch tested?
This is a documentation-only change.
Closes#31738 from lidavidm/spark-34463.
Authored-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an issue that `quoteIfNeeded` quotes a name only if it contains `.` or ``` ` ```.
This method should quote it if it contains non-word characters.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's a potential bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New test.
Closes#31964 from sarutak/fix-quoteIfNeeded.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements the missing typehints as per SPARK-34630.
### Why are the changes needed?
To satisfy the aforementioned Jira ticket
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, just adding a missing typehint for Project Zen
### How was this patch tested?
No tests needed (just adding a typehint)
Closes#31823 from dannymeijer/feature/SPARK-34630.
Authored-by: Danny Meijer <danny.meijer@nike.com>
Signed-off-by: zero323 <mszymkiewicz@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Pass the raised `ImportError` on failing to import pandas/pyarrow. This will help the user identify whether pandas/pyarrow are indeed not in the environment or if they threw a different `ImportError`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This can already happen in Pandas for example where it could throw an `ImportError` on its initialisation path if `dateutil` doesn't satisfy a certain version requirement https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/0.24.x/pandas/compat/__init__.py#L438
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it will now show the root cause of the exception when pandas or arrow is missing during import.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
```python
from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf
spark.range(1).select(pandas_udf(lambda x: x))
```
Before:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/...//spark/python/pyspark/sql/pandas/functions.py", line 332, in pandas_udf
require_minimum_pyarrow_version()
File "/.../spark/python/pyspark/sql/pandas/utils.py", line 53, in require_minimum_pyarrow_version
raise ImportError("PyArrow >= %s must be installed; however, "
ImportError: PyArrow >= 1.0.0 must be installed; however, it was not found.
```
After:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/.../spark/python/pyspark/sql/pandas/utils.py", line 49, in require_minimum_pyarrow_version
import pyarrow
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyarrow'
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/.../spark/python/pyspark/sql/pandas/functions.py", line 332, in pandas_udf
require_minimum_pyarrow_version()
File "/.../spark/python/pyspark/sql/pandas/utils.py", line 55, in require_minimum_pyarrow_version
raise ImportError("PyArrow >= %s must be installed; however, "
ImportError: PyArrow >= 1.0.0 must be installed; however, it was not found.
```
Closes#31902 from johnhany97/jayad/spark-34803.
Lead-authored-by: John Ayad <johnhany97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John H. Ayad <johnhany97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to reorder the items in User Guide in PySpark documentation in order to place general guides first and advance ones later.
### Why are the changes needed?
For users to more easily follow.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it changes the order in the items in documentation .
### How was this patch tested?
Manually verified the documentation after building:
<img width="768" alt="Screen Shot 2021-03-22 at 2 38 41 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6477701/111945072-5537d680-8b1c-11eb-9f43-02f3ad63a509.png">
FWIW, the current page: https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/api/python/user_guide/index.htmlCloses#31922 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34818.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Document `mode` as a supported Imputer strategy in Pyspark docs.
### Why are the changes needed?
Support was added in 3.1, and documented in Scala, but some Python docs were missed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#31883 from srowen/ImputerModeDocs.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an issue that `sql` method in the following classes which take qualified names don't quote the qualified names properly.
* UnresolvedAttribute
* AttributeReference
* Alias
One instance caused by this issue is reported in SPARK-34626.
```
UnresolvedAttribute("a" :: "b" :: Nil).sql
`a.b` // expected: `a`.`b`
```
And other instances are like as follows.
```
UnresolvedAttribute("a`b"::"c.d"::Nil).sql
a`b.`c.d` // expected: `a``b`.`c.d`
AttributeReference("a.b", IntegerType)(qualifier = "c.d"::Nil).sql
c.d.`a.b` // expected: `c.d`.`a.b`
Alias(AttributeReference("a", IntegerType)(), "b.c")(qualifier = "d.e"::Nil).sql
`a` AS d.e.`b.c` // expected: `a` AS `d.e`.`b.c`
```
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New test.
Closes#31754 from sarutak/fix-qualified-names.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR upgrade Py4J from 0.10.9.1 to 0.10.9.2 that contains some bug fixes and improvements.
* expose shell parameter in Popen inside launch_gateway. ([bartdag/py4j220efc3](220efc3716))
* fixed Flake8 errors ([bartdag/py4j6c6ee9a](6c6ee9aedc))
### Why are the changes needed?
To leverage fixes from the upstream in Py4J.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins build and GitHub Actions will test it out.
Closes#31796 from wankunde/py4j.
Authored-by: wankunde <wankunde@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
pyrolite 4.21 introduced and enabled value comparison by default (`valueCompare=true`) during object memoization and serialization: https://github.com/irmen/Pyrolite/blob/pyrolite-4.21/java/src/main/java/net/razorvine/pickle/Pickler.java#L112-L122
This change has undesired effect when we serialize a row (actually `GenericRowWithSchema`) to be passed to python: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/branch-3.0/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/EvaluatePython.scala#L60. A simple example is that
```
new GenericRowWithSchema(Array(1.0, 1.0), StructType(Seq(StructField("_1", DoubleType), StructField("_2", DoubleType))))
```
and
```
new GenericRowWithSchema(Array(1, 1), StructType(Seq(StructField("_1", IntegerType), StructField("_2", IntegerType))))
```
are currently equal and the second instance is replaced to the short code of the first one during serialization.
### Why are the changes needed?
The above can cause nasty issues like the one in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34545 description:
```
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import udf
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>>
>>> def udf1(data_type):
def u1(e):
return e[0]
return udf(u1, data_type)
>>>
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame([((1.0, 1.0), (1, 1))], ['c1', 'c2'])
>>>
>>> df = df.withColumn("c3", udf1(DoubleType())("c1"))
>>> df = df.withColumn("c4", udf1(IntegerType())("c2"))
>>>
>>> df.select("c3").show()
+---+
| c3|
+---+
|1.0|
+---+
>>> df.select("c4").show()
+---+
| c4|
+---+
| 1|
+---+
>>> df.select("c3", "c4").show()
+---+----+
| c3| c4|
+---+----+
|1.0|null|
+---+----+
```
This is because during serialization from JVM to Python `GenericRowWithSchema(1.0, 1.0)` (`c1`) is memoized first and when `GenericRowWithSchema(1, 1)` (`c2`) comes next, it is replaced to some short code of the `c1` (instead of serializing `c2` out) as they are `equal()`. The python functions then runs but the return type of `c4` is expected to be `IntegerType` and if a different type (`DoubleType`) comes back from python then it is discarded: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/branch-3.0/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/EvaluatePython.scala#L108-L113
After this PR:
```
>>> df.select("c3", "c4").show()
+---+---+
| c3| c4|
+---+---+
|1.0| 1|
+---+---+
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, fixes a correctness issue.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new UT + manual tests.
Closes#31682 from peter-toth/SPARK-34545-fix-row-comparison.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix a call to setParams in the Linear Regression docs example in Pyspark to avoid a TypeError.
### Why are the changes needed?
The example is slightly wrong and we should not show an error in the docs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#31760 from srowen/SPARK-34642.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes a Python UDF `plus_one` used in `GroupedAggPandasUDFTests` to always return float (double) values.
### Why are the changes needed?
The Python UDF `plus_one` used in `GroupedAggPandasUDFTests` is always returning `v + 1` regardless of its type. The return type of the UDF is 'double', so if the input is int, the result will be `null`.
```py
>>> df = spark.range(10).toDF('id') \
... .withColumn("vs", array([lit(i * 1.0) + col('id') for i in range(20, 30)])) \
... .withColumn("v", explode(col('vs'))) \
... .drop('vs') \
... .withColumn('w', lit(1.0))
>>> udf('double')
... def plus_one(v):
... assert isinstance(v, (int, float))
... return v + 1
...
>>> pandas_udf('double', PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG)
... def sum_udf(v):
... return v.sum()
...
>>> df.groupby(plus_one(df.id)).agg(sum_udf(df.v)).show()
+------------+----------+
|plus_one(id)|sum_udf(v)|
+------------+----------+
| null| 2900.0|
+------------+----------+
```
This is meaningless and should be:
```py
>>> udf('double')
... def plus_one(v):
... assert isinstance(v, (int, float))
... return float(v + 1)
...
>>> df.groupby(plus_one(df.id)).agg(sum_udf(df.v)).sort('plus_one(id)').show()
+------------+----------+
|plus_one(id)|sum_udf(v)|
+------------+----------+
| 1.0| 245.0|
| 2.0| 255.0|
| 3.0| 265.0|
| 4.0| 275.0|
| 5.0| 285.0|
| 6.0| 295.0|
| 7.0| 305.0|
| 8.0| 315.0|
| 9.0| 325.0|
| 10.0| 335.0|
+------------+----------+
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Fixed the test.
Closes#31730 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-34610/test_pandas_udf_grouped_agg.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`TaskContextTestsWithWorkerReuse.test_task_context_correct_with_python_worker_reuse` can be flaky and fails sometimes:
```
======================================================================
ERROR [1.798s]: test_task_context_correct_with_python_worker_reuse (pyspark.tests.test_taskcontext.TaskContextTestsWithWorkerReuse)
...
test_task_context_correct_with_python_worker_reuse
self.assertTrue(pid in worker_pids)
AssertionError: False is not true
----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
I suspect that the Python worker was killed for whatever reason and new attempt created a new Python worker.
This PR fixes the flakiness simply by retrying the test case.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make the tests more robust.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested it by controlling the conditions manually in the test codes.
Closes#31723 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34604.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### Why is this change being proposed?
This patch adds support for a new "product" aggregation function in `sql.functions` which multiplies-together all values in an aggregation group.
This is likely to be useful in statistical applications which involve combining probabilities, or financial applications that involve combining cumulative interest rates, but is also a versatile mathematical operation of similar status to `sum` or `stddev`. Other users [have noted](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52991640/cumulative-product-in-spark) the absence of such a function in current releases of Spark.
This function is both much more concise than an expression of the form `exp(sum(log(...)))`, and avoids awkward edge-cases associated with some values being zero or negative, as well as being less computationally costly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No - only adds new function.
### How was this patch tested?
Built-in tests have been added for the new `catalyst.expressions.aggregate.Product` class and its invocation via the (scala) `sql.functions.product` function. The latter, and the PySpark wrapper have also been manually tested in spark-shell and pyspark sessions. The SparkR wrapper is currently untested, and may need separate validation (I'm not an "R" user myself).
An illustration of the new functionality, within PySpark is as follows:
```
import pyspark.sql.functions as pf, pyspark.sql.window as pw
df = sqlContext.range(1, 17).toDF("x")
win = pw.Window.partitionBy(pf.lit(1)).orderBy(pf.col("x"))
df.withColumn("factorial", pf.product("x").over(win)).show(20, False)
+---+---------------+
|x |factorial |
+---+---------------+
|1 |1.0 |
|2 |2.0 |
|3 |6.0 |
|4 |24.0 |
|5 |120.0 |
|6 |720.0 |
|7 |5040.0 |
|8 |40320.0 |
|9 |362880.0 |
|10 |3628800.0 |
|11 |3.99168E7 |
|12 |4.790016E8 |
|13 |6.2270208E9 |
|14 |8.71782912E10 |
|15 |1.307674368E12 |
|16 |2.0922789888E13|
+---+---------------+
```
Closes#30745 from rwpenney/feature/agg-product.
Lead-authored-by: Richard Penney <rwp@rwpenney.uk>
Co-authored-by: Richard Penney <rwpenney@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Code in the PR generates random parameters for hyperparameter tuning. A discussion with Sean Owen can be found on the dev mailing list here:
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Hyperparameter-Optimization-via-Randomization-td30629.html
All code is entirely my own work and I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license.
### Why are the changes needed?
Randomization can be a more effective techinique than a grid search since min/max points can fall between the grid and never be found. Randomisation is not so restricted although the probability of finding minima/maxima is dependent on the number of attempts.
Alice Zheng has an accessible description on how this technique works at https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/evaluating-machine-learning/9781492048756/ch04.html
Although there are Python libraries with more sophisticated techniques, not every Spark developer is using Python.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
A new class (`ParamRandomBuilder.scala`) and its tests have been created but there is no change to existing code. This class offers an alternative to `ParamGridBuilder` and can be dropped into the code wherever `ParamGridBuilder` appears. Indeed, it extends `ParamGridBuilder` and is completely compatible with its interface. It merely adds one method that provides a range over which a hyperparameter will be randomly defined.
### How was this patch tested?
Tests `ParamRandomBuilderSuite.scala` and `RandomRangesSuite.scala` were added.
`ParamRandomBuilderSuite` is the analogue of the already existing `ParamGridBuilderSuite` which tests the user-facing interface.
`RandomRangesSuite` uses ScalaCheck to test the random ranges over which hyperparameters are distributed.
Closes#31535 from PhillHenry/ParamRandomBuilder.
Authored-by: Phillip Henry <PhillHenry@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes:
- Change http to https for better security
- Change http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ to official mailing list link (https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spark-dev/)
### Why are the changes needed?
For better security, and to use official link.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, It exposes more secure and correct links to the PySpark end users in PySpark documentation.
### How was this patch tested?
I manually checked if each link works
Closes#31616 from HyukjinKwon/minor-https.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improving the documentation and release process by pinning Jekyll version by Gemfile and Bundler.
Some files and their responsibilities within this PR:
- `docs/.bundle/config` is used to specify a directory "docs/.local_ruby_bundle" which will be used as destination to install the ruby packages into instead of the global one which requires root access
- `docs/Gemfile` is specifying the required Jekyll version and other top level gem versions
- `docs/Gemfile.lock` is generated by the "bundle install". This file contains the exact resolved versions of all the gems including the top level gems and all the direct and transitive dependencies of those gems. When this file is generated it contains a platform related section "PLATFORMS" (in my case after the generation it was "universal-darwin-19"). Still this file must be under version control as when the version of a gem does not fit to the one specified in `Gemfile` an error comes (i.e. if the `Gemfile.lock` was generated for Jekyll 4.1.0 and its version is updated in the `Gemfile` to 4.2.0 then it triggers the error: "The bundle currently has jekyll locked at 4.1.0."). This is solution is also suggested officially in [its documentation](https://bundler.io/rationale.html#checking-your-code-into-version-control). To get rid of the specific platform (like "universal-darwin-19") first we have to add "ruby" as platform [which means this should work on every platform where Ruby runs](https://guides.rubygems.org/what-is-a-gem/)) by running "bundle lock --add-platform ruby" then the specific platform can be removed by "bundle lock --remove-platform universal-darwin-19".
After this the correct process to update Jekyll version is the following:
1. update the version in `Gemfile`
2. run "bundle update" which updates the `Gemfile.lock`
3. commit both files
This process for version update is tested for details please check the testing section.
### Why are the changes needed?
Using different Jekyll versions can generate different output documents.
This PR standardize the process.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, assuming the release was done via docker by using `do-release-docker.sh`.
In that case there should be no difference at all as the same Jekyll version is specified in the Gemfile.
### How was this patch tested?
#### Testing document generation
Doc generation step was triggered via the docker release:
```
$ ./do-release-docker.sh -d ~/working -n -s docs
...
========================
= Building documentation...
Command: /opt/spark-rm/release-build.sh docs
Log file: docs.log
Skipping publish step.
```
The docs.log contains the followings:
```
Building Spark docs
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/.........
Using bundler 2.2.9
Fetching rb-fsevent 0.10.4
Fetching forwardable-extended 2.6.0
Fetching public_suffix 4.0.6
Fetching colorator 1.1.0
Fetching eventmachine 1.2.7
Fetching http_parser.rb 0.6.0
Fetching ffi 1.14.2
Fetching concurrent-ruby 1.1.8
Installing colorator 1.1.0
Installing forwardable-extended 2.6.0
Installing rb-fsevent 0.10.4
Installing public_suffix 4.0.6
Installing http_parser.rb 0.6.0 with native extensions
Installing eventmachine 1.2.7 with native extensions
Installing concurrent-ruby 1.1.8
Fetching rexml 3.2.4
Fetching liquid 4.0.3
Installing ffi 1.14.2 with native extensions
Installing rexml 3.2.4
Installing liquid 4.0.3
Fetching mercenary 0.4.0
Installing mercenary 0.4.0
Fetching rouge 3.26.0
Installing rouge 3.26.0
Fetching safe_yaml 1.0.5
Installing safe_yaml 1.0.5
Fetching unicode-display_width 1.7.0
Installing unicode-display_width 1.7.0
Fetching webrick 1.7.0
Installing webrick 1.7.0
Fetching pathutil 0.16.2
Fetching kramdown 2.3.0
Fetching terminal-table 2.0.0
Fetching addressable 2.7.0
Fetching i18n 1.8.9
Installing terminal-table 2.0.0
Installing pathutil 0.16.2
Installing i18n 1.8.9
Installing addressable 2.7.0
Installing kramdown 2.3.0
Fetching kramdown-parser-gfm 1.1.0
Installing kramdown-parser-gfm 1.1.0
Fetching rb-inotify 0.10.1
Fetching sassc 2.4.0
Fetching em-websocket 0.5.2
Installing rb-inotify 0.10.1
Installing em-websocket 0.5.2
Installing sassc 2.4.0 with native extensions
Fetching listen 3.4.1
Installing listen 3.4.1
Fetching jekyll-watch 2.2.1
Installing jekyll-watch 2.2.1
Fetching jekyll-sass-converter 2.1.0
Installing jekyll-sass-converter 2.1.0
Fetching jekyll 4.2.0
Installing jekyll 4.2.0
Fetching jekyll-redirect-from 0.16.0
Installing jekyll-redirect-from 0.16.0
Bundle complete! 4 Gemfile dependencies, 30 gems now installed.
Bundled gems are installed into `./.local_ruby_bundle`
```
#### Testing Jekyll (or other gem) update
First locally I reverted Jekyll to 4.1.0:
```
$ rm Gemfile.lock
$ rm -rf .local_ruby_bundle
# edited Gemfile to use version 4.1.0
$ cat Gemfile
source "https://rubygems.org"
gem "jekyll", "4.1.0"
gem "rouge", "3.26.0"
gem "jekyll-redirect-from", "0.16.0"
gem "webrick", "1.7"
$ bundle install
...
```
Testing Jekyll version before the update:
```
$ bundle exec jekyll --version
jekyll 4.1.0
```
Imitating Jekyll update coming from git by reverting my local changes:
```
$ git checkout Gemfile
Updated 1 path from the index
$ cat Gemfile
source "https://rubygems.org"
gem "jekyll", "4.2.0"
gem "rouge", "3.26.0"
gem "jekyll-redirect-from", "0.16.0"
gem "webrick", "1.7"
$ git checkout Gemfile.lock
Updated 1 path from the index
```
Run the install:
```
$ bundle install
...
```
Checking the updated Jekyll version:
```
$ bundle exec jekyll --version
jekyll 4.2.0
```
Closes#31559 from attilapiros/pin-jekyll-version.
Lead-authored-by: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Attila Zsolt Piros <2017933+attilapiros@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move the datetime rebase SQL configs from the `legacy` namespace by:
1. Renaming of the existing rebase configs like `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead` -> `spark.sql.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead`.
2. Add the legacy configs as alternatives
3. Deprecate the legacy rebase configs.
### Why are the changes needed?
The rebasing SQL configs like `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead` can be used not only for migration from previous Spark versions but also to read/write datatime columns saved by other systems/frameworks/libs. So, the configs shouldn't be considered as legacy configs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Should not. Users will see a warning if they still use one of the legacy configs.
### How was this patch tested?
1. Manually checking new configs:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.get("spark.sql.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead")
res0: String = EXCEPTION
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead", "LEGACY")
21/02/17 14:57:10 WARN SQLConf: The SQL config 'spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead' has been deprecated in Spark v3.2 and may be removed in the future. Use 'spark.sql.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead' instead.
scala> spark.conf.get("spark.sql.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead")
res2: String = LEGACY
```
2. By running a datetime rebasing test suite:
```
$ build/sbt "test:testOnly *ParquetRebaseDatetimeV1Suite"
```
Closes#31576 from MaxGekk/rebase-confs-alternatives.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use `_create_udf` where we need to create `UserDefinedFunction` to maintain codes easier.
### Why are the changes needed?
For the better readability of codes and maintenance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, refactoring.
### How was this patch tested?
Ran the existing unittests. CI in this PR should test it out too.
Closes#31537 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34408.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Creating a Pandas dataframe via Apache Arrow currently can use twice as much memory as the final result, because during the conversion, both Pandas and Arrow retain a copy of the data. Arrow has a "self-destruct" mode now (Arrow >= 0.16) to avoid this, by freeing each column after conversion. This PR integrates support for this in toPandas, handling a couple of edge cases:
self_destruct has no effect unless the memory is allocated appropriately, which is handled in the Arrow serializer here. Essentially, the issue is that self_destruct frees memory column-wise, but Arrow record batches are oriented row-wise:
```
Record batch 0: allocation 0: column 0 chunk 0, column 1 chunk 0, ...
Record batch 1: allocation 1: column 0 chunk 1, column 1 chunk 1, ...
```
In this scenario, Arrow will drop references to all of column 0's chunks, but no memory will actually be freed, as the chunks were just slices of an underlying allocation. The PR copies each column into its own allocation so that memory is instead arranged as so:
```
Record batch 0: allocation 0 column 0 chunk 0, allocation 1 column 1 chunk 0, ...
Record batch 1: allocation 2 column 0 chunk 1, allocation 3 column 1 chunk 1, ...
```
The optimization is disabled by default, and can be enabled with the Spark SQL conf "spark.sql.execution.arrow.pyspark.selfDestruct.enabled" set to "true". We can't always apply this optimization because it's more likely to generate a dataframe with immutable buffers, which Pandas doesn't always handle well, and because it is slower overall (since it only converts one column at a time instead of in parallel).
### Why are the changes needed?
This lets us load larger datasets - in particular, with N bytes of memory, before we could never load a dataset bigger than N/2 bytes; now the overhead is more like N/1.25 or so.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes - it adds a new SQL conf "spark.sql.execution.arrow.pyspark.selfDestruct.enabled"
### How was this patch tested?
See the [mailing list](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Reducing-memory-usage-of-toPandas-with-Arrow-quot-self-destruct-quot-option-td30149.html) - it was tested with Python memory_profiler. Unit tests added to check memory within certain bounds and correctness with the option enabled.
Closes#29818 from lidavidm/spark-32953.
Authored-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This follows up #31160 to update score function in the document.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently we use `f_classif`, `ch2`, `f_regression`, which sound to me the sklearn's naming. It is good to have it but I think it is nice if we have formal score function name with sklearn's ones.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No, only doc change.
Closes#31531 from viirya/SPARK-34080-minor.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose new options for the Parquet datasource:
1. `datetimeRebaseMode`
2. `int96RebaseMode`
Both options influence on loading ancient dates and timestamps column values from parquet files. The `datetimeRebaseMode` option impacts on loading values of the `DATE`, `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` and `TIMESTAMP_MILLIS` types, `int96RebaseMode` impacts on loading of `INT96` timestamps.
The options support the same values as the SQL configs `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead` and `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.int96RebaseModeInRead` namely;
- `"LEGACY"`, when an option is set to this value, Spark rebases dates/timestamps from the legacy hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian) to the Proleptic Gregorian calendar.
- `"CORRECTED"`, dates/timestamps are read AS IS from parquet files.
- `"EXCEPTION"`, when it is set as an option value, Spark will fail the reading if it sees ancient dates/timestamps that are ambiguous between the two calendars.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. New options will allow to load parquet files from at least two sources in different rebasing modes in the same query. For instance:
```scala
val df1 = spark.read.option("datetimeRebaseMode", "legacy").parquet(folder1)
val df2 = spark.read.option("datetimeRebaseMode", "corrected").parquet(folder2)
df1.join(df2, ...)
```
Before the changes, it is impossible because the SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead` influences on both reads.
2. Mixing of Dataset/DataFrame and RDD APIs should become possible. Since SQL configs are not propagated through RDDs, the following code fails on ancient timestamps:
```scala
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead", "legacy")
spark.read.parquet(folder).distinct.rdd.collect()
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suites:
```
$ build/sbt "sql/test:testOnly *ParquetRebaseDatetimeV1Suite"
$ build/sbt "sql/test:testOnly *ParquetRebaseDatetimeV2Suite"
```
Closes#31489 from MaxGekk/parquet-rebase-options.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current implement of some DDL not unify the output and not pass the output properly to physical command.
Such as: The `ShowTables` output attributes `namespace`, but `ShowTablesCommand` output attributes `database`.
As the query plan, this PR pass the output attributes from `ShowTables` to `ShowTablesCommand`, `ShowTableExtended ` to `ShowTablesCommand`.
Take `show tables` and `show table extended like 'tbl'` as example.
The output before this PR:
`show tables`
|database|tableName|isTemporary|
-- | -- | --
| default| tbl| false|
If catalog is v2 session catalog, the output before this PR:
|namespace|tableName|
-- | --
| default| tbl
`show table extended like 'tbl'`
|database|tableName|isTemporary| information|
-- | -- | -- | --
| default| tbl| false|Database: default...|
The output after this PR:
`show tables`
|namespace|tableName|isTemporary|
-- | -- | --
| default| tbl| false|
`show table extended like 'tbl'`
|namespace|tableName|isTemporary| information|
-- | -- | -- | --
| default| tbl| false|Database: default...|
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR have benefits as follows:
First, Unify schema for the output of SHOW TABLES.
Second, pass the output attributes could keep the expr ID unchanged, so that avoid bugs when we apply more operators above the command output dataframe.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
The output schema of `SHOW TABLES` replace `database` by `namespace`.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#31245 from beliefer/SPARK-34157.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
This changeset is published into the public domain.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some typos and syntax issues in docstrings and the output of `dev/lint-python` have been fixed.
### Why are the changes needed?
In some places, the documentation did not refer to parameters or classes by the full and correct name, potentially causing uncertainty in the reader or rendering issues in Sphinx. Also, a typo in the standard output of `dev/lint-python` was fixed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Slight improvements in documentation, and in standard output of `dev/lint-python`.
### How was this patch tested?
Manual testing and `dev/lint-python` run. No new Sphinx warnings arise due to this change.
Closes#31401 from DavidToneian/SPARK-34300.
Authored-by: David Toneian <david@toneian.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR completes snake_case rule at functions APIs across the languages, see also SPARK-10621.
In more details, this PR:
- Adds `count_distinct` in Scala Python, and R, and document that `count_distinct` is encouraged. This was not deprecated because `countDistinct` is pretty commonly used. We could deprecate in the future releases.
- (Scala-specific) adds `typedlit` but doesn't deprecate `typedLit` which is arguably commonly used. Likewise, we could deprecate in the future releases.
- Deprecates and renames:
- `sumDistinct` -> `sum_distinct`
- `bitwiseNOT` -> `bitwise_not`
- `shiftLeft` -> `shiftleft` (matched with SQL name in `FunctionRegistry`)
- `shiftRight` -> `shiftright` (matched with SQL name in `FunctionRegistry`)
- `shiftRightUnsigned` -> `shiftrightunsigned` (matched with SQL name in `FunctionRegistry`)
- (Scala-specific) `callUDF` -> `call_udf`
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep the consistent naming in APIs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it deprecates some APIs and add new renamed APIs as described above.
### How was this patch tested?
Unittests were added.
Closes#31408 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34306.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, use Guavaording instead of BoundedPriorityQueue;
2, use local variables;
3, avoid conversion: ml.vector -> mllib.vector
### Why are the changes needed?
this pr is about 30% faster than existing impl
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsuites
Closes#31276 from zhengruifeng/w2v_findSynonyms_opt.
Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds `NullType` support for Arrow executions.
### Why are the changes needed?
As Arrow supports null type, we can convert `NullType` between PySpark and pandas with Arrow enabled.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, if a user has a DataFrame including `NullType`, it will be able to convert with Arrow enabled.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#31285 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-33489/arrow_nulltype.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added typing for keyword-only single argument udf overload.
### Why are the changes needed?
The intended use case is:
```
udf(returnType="string")
def f(x): ...
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes - a new typing for udf is considered valid.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#31282 from pgrz/patch-1.
Authored-by: pgrz <grzegorski.piotr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR supplements the contents in the "Python Package Management".
If there is no Python installed in the local for all nodes when using `venv-pack`, job would fail as below.
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf
>>> pandas_udf('double')
... def pandas_plus_one(v: pd.Series) -> pd.Series:
... return v + 1
...
>>> spark.range(10).select(pandas_plus_one("id")).show()
...
Cannot run program "./environment/bin/python": error=2, No such file or directory
...
```
This is because the Python in the [packed environment via `venv-pack` has a symbolic link](https://github.com/jcrist/venv-pack/issues/5) that connects Python to the local one.
To avoid this confusion, it seems better to have an additional explanation for this.
### Why are the changes needed?
To provide more detailed information to users so that they don’t get confused
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, this PR fixes the part of "Python Package Management" in the "User Guide" documents.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually built the doc.
Closes#31280 from itholic/SPARK-34190.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon309@naver.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to consider the case when [`inspect.currentframe()`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/inspect.html#inspect.currentframe) returns `None` because the underlyining Python implementation does not support frame.
### Why are the changes needed?
To be safer and potentially for the official support of other Python implementations in the future.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested via:
When frame is available:
```
vi tmp.py
```
```python
from inspect import *
lineno = getframeinfo(currentframe()).lineno + 1 if currentframe() is not None else 0
print(warnings.formatwarning(
"Failed to set memory limit: {0}".format(Exception("argh!")),
ResourceWarning,
__file__,
lineno),
file=sys.stderr)
```
```
python tmp.py
```
```
/.../tmp.py:3: ResourceWarning: Failed to set memory limit: argh!
print(warnings.formatwarning(
```
When frame is not available:
```
vi tmp.py
```
```python
from inspect import *
lineno = getframeinfo(currentframe()).lineno + 1 if None is not None else 0
print(warnings.formatwarning(
"Failed to set memory limit: {0}".format(Exception("argh!")),
ResourceWarning,
__file__,
lineno),
file=sys.stderr)
```
```
python tmp.py
```
```
/.../tmp.py:0: ResourceWarning: Failed to set memory limit: argh!
```
Closes#31239 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33730-followup.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
update the ParamValidators of `maxDepth`
### Why are the changes needed?
current impl of tree models only support maxDepth<=30
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
If `maxDepth`>30, fail quickly
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsuites
Closes#31163 from zhengruifeng/param_maxDepth_upbound.
Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR:
- Adds as small hierarchy of warnings to be used in PySpark applications. These extend built-in classes and top level `PySparkWarning`.
- Replaces `DeprecationWarnings` (intended for developers) with PySpark specific subclasses of `FutureWarning` (intended for end users).
### Why are the changes needed?
- To be more precise and add users additional control (in addition to standard module level filters) over PySpark warnings handling.
- Correct semantics (at the moment we use `DeprecationWarning` in user-facing API, but it is intended "for warnings about deprecated features when those warnings are intended for other Python developers").
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Code can raise different type of warning than before.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#30985 from zero323/SPARK-33730.
Authored-by: zero323 <mszymkiewicz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add UnivariateFeatureSelector
### Why are the changes needed?
Have one UnivariateFeatureSelector, so we don't need to have three Feature Selectors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes
```
selector = UnivariateFeatureSelector(featureCols=["x", "y", "z"], labelCol=["target"], featureType="categorical", labelType="continuous", selectorType="numTopFeatures", numTopFeatures=100)
```
Or
numTopFeatures
```
selector = UnivariateFeatureSelector(featureCols=["x", "y", "z"], labelCol=["target"], scoreFunction="f_classif", selectorType="numTopFeatures", numTopFeatures=100)
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add Unit test
Closes#31160 from huaxingao/UnivariateSelector.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to strip auto-generated cast. The main logic is:
1. Add tag if Cast is specified by user.
2. Wrap `PrettyAttribute` in usePrettyExpression.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make sql consistent with dsl. Here is an inconsistent example before this PR:
```
-- output field name: FLOOR(1)
spark.emptyDataFrame.select(floor(lit(1)))
-- output field name: FLOOR(CAST(1 AS DOUBLE))
spark.sql("select floor(1)")
```
Note that, we don't remove the `Cast` so the auto-generated `Cast` can still work. The only changed place is `usePrettyExpression`, we use `PrettyAttribute` replace `Cast` to give a better sql string.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the default field name may change.
### How was this patch tested?
Add test and pass exists test.
Closes#31034 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33989.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a follow-up of #29138 and #29195 to add more tests for `slice` function.
### Why are the changes needed?
The original PRs are missing tests with column-based arguments instead of literals.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests and existing tests.
Closes#31159 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-32338/slice_tests.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to:
- Add a link of quick start in PySpark docs into "Programming Guides" in Spark main docs
- `ML` / `MLlib` -> `MLlib (DataFrame-based)` / `MLlib (RDD-based)` in API reference page
- Mention other user guides as well because the guide such as [ML](http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/ml-guide.html) and [SQL](http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/sql-programming-guide.html).
- Mention other migration guides as well because PySpark can get affected by it.
### Why are the changes needed?
For better documentation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
It fixes user-facing docs. However, it's not released out yet.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested by running:
```bash
cd docs
SKIP_SCALADOC=1 SKIP_RDOC=1 SKIP_SQLDOC=1 jekyll serve --watch
```
Closes#31082 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34041.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27406. It fixes the naming to match with Scala side.
Note that there are a bit of inconsistency already e.g.) `col`, `e`, `expr` and `column`. This part I did not change but other names like `zero` vs `initialValue` or `col1`/`col2` vs `left`/`right` looks unnecessary.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make the usage similar with Scala side, and for consistency.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this is not released yet.
### How was this patch tested?
GitHub Actions and Jenkins build will test it out.
Closes#31062 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-30681.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to upgrade cloudpickle from 1.5.0 to 1.6.0.
It virtually contains one fix:
4510be850d
From a cursory look, this isn't a regression, and not even properly supported in Python:
```python
>>> import pickle
>>> pickle.dumps({}.keys())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: cannot pickle 'dict_keys' object
```
So it seems fine not to backport.
### Why are the changes needed?
To leverage bug fixes from the cloudpickle upstream.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins build and GitHub actions build will test it out.
Closes#31007 from HyukjinKwon/cloudpickle-upgrade.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR upgrade Py4J from 0.10.9 to 0.10.9.1 that contains some bug fixes and improvements.
It contains one bug fix (4152353ac1).
### Why are the changes needed?
To leverage fixes from the upstream in Py4J.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins build and GitHub Actions will test it out.
Closes#31009 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33984.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to clarify:
- `PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON` should not be set for cluster modes in YARN and Kubernates.
- `spark.yarn.appMasterEnv.PYSPARK_PYTHON` is not required in YARN. This is just another way to set `PYSPARK_PYTHON` that is specific for a Spark application.
### Why are the changes needed?
To clarify what's required and not.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, this is a user-facing doc change.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Note that this credits to gaborgsomogyi who actually tested and raised a doubt about this offline to me.
I also manually tested all again to double check.
Closes#30938 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33824-followup.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow up work for #30521, document the following behaviors in the API doc:
- Figure out the effects when configurations are (provider/partitionBy) conflicting with the existing table.
- Document the lack of functionality on creating a v2 table, and guide that the users should ensure a table is created in prior to avoid the behavior unintended/insufficient table is being created.
### Why are the changes needed?
We didn't have full support for the V2 table created in the API now. (TODO SPARK-33638)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Document only.
Closes#30885 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-33659.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <yuanjian.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reopened from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27525.
The exception messages for dstream.py when using windows were improved to be specific about what sliding duration is important.
### Why are the changes needed?
The batch interval of dstreams are improperly named as sliding windows. The term sliding window is also used to reference the new window of a dstream collected over a window of rdds in a parent dstream. We should probably fix the naming convention of sliding window used in the dstream class, but for now more this more explicit exception message may reduce confusion.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
It wasn't since this is only a change of the exception message
Closes#30871 from kykrueger/kykrueger-patch-1.
Authored-by: Kyle Krueger <kyle.s.krueger@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to:
- Make doctests simpler to show the usage (since we're not running them now).
- Use the test utils to drop the tables if exists.
### Why are the changes needed?
Better docs and code readability.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only. It includes some doc changes in unreleased branches.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
```bash
cd python
./run-tests --python-executable=python3.9,python3.8 --testnames "pyspark.sql.tests.test_streaming StreamingTests"
```
Closes#30873 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33836.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to have its own metastore directory to avoid potential conflict in catalog operations.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make PySpark tests less flaky.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested by trying some sleeps in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30873.
Closes#30875 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33869.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to expose `DataStreamReader.table` (SPARK-32885) and `DataStreamWriter.toTable` (SPARK-32896) to PySpark, which are the only way to read and write with table in Structured Streaming.
### Why are the changes needed?
Please refer SPARK-32885 and SPARK-32896 for rationalizations of these public APIs. This PR only exposes them to PySpark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, PySpark users will be able to read and write with table in Structured Streaming query.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
> v1 table
>> create table A and ingest to the table A
```
spark.sql("""
create table table_pyspark_parquet (
value long,
`timestamp` timestamp
) USING parquet
""")
df = spark.readStream.format('rate').option('rowsPerSecond', 100).load()
query = df.writeStream.toTable('table_pyspark_parquet', checkpointLocation='/tmp/checkpoint5')
query.lastProgress
query.stop()
```
>> read table A and ingest to the table B which doesn't exist
```
df2 = spark.readStream.table('table_pyspark_parquet')
query2 = df2.writeStream.toTable('table_pyspark_parquet_nonexist', format='parquet', checkpointLocation='/tmp/checkpoint2')
query2.lastProgress
query2.stop()
```
>> select tables
```
spark.sql("DESCRIBE TABLE table_pyspark_parquet").show()
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM table_pyspark_parquet").show()
spark.sql("DESCRIBE TABLE table_pyspark_parquet_nonexist").show()
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM table_pyspark_parquet_nonexist").show()
```
> v2 table (leveraging Apache Iceberg as it provides V2 table and custom catalog as well)
>> create table A and ingest to the table A
```
spark.sql("""
create table iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table (
value long,
`timestamp` timestamp
) USING iceberg
""")
df = spark.readStream.format('rate').option('rowsPerSecond', 100).load()
query = df.select('value', 'timestamp').writeStream.toTable('iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table', checkpointLocation='/tmp/checkpoint_v2table_1')
query.lastProgress
query.stop()
```
>> ingest to the non-exist table B
```
df2 = spark.readStream.format('rate').option('rowsPerSecond', 100).load()
query2 = df2.select('value', 'timestamp').writeStream.toTable('iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table_nonexist', checkpointLocation='/tmp/checkpoint_v2table_2')
query2.lastProgress
query2.stop()
```
>> ingest to the non-exist table C partitioned by `value % 10`
```
df3 = spark.readStream.format('rate').option('rowsPerSecond', 100).load()
df3a = df3.selectExpr('value', 'timestamp', 'value % 10 AS partition').repartition('partition')
query3 = df3a.writeStream.partitionBy('partition').toTable('iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table_nonexist_partitioned', checkpointLocation='/tmp/checkpoint_v2table_3')
query3.lastProgress
query3.stop()
```
>> select tables
```
spark.sql("DESCRIBE TABLE iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table").show()
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table").show()
spark.sql("DESCRIBE TABLE iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table_nonexist").show()
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table_nonexist").show()
spark.sql("DESCRIBE TABLE iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table_nonexist_partitioned").show()
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM iceberg_catalog.default.table_pyspark_v2table_nonexist_partitioned").show()
```
Closes#30835 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-33836.
Lead-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
