Commit graph

154 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gengliang Wang 0fb7127f85 Preparing development version 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT 2021-09-23 08:46:28 +00:00
Gengliang Wang b609f2fe0c Preparing Spark release v3.2.0-rc4 2021-09-23 08:46:22 +00:00
Gengliang Wang b0249851f6 Preparing development version 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT 2021-09-18 11:30:12 +00:00
Gengliang Wang 96044e9735 Preparing Spark release v3.2.0-rc3 2021-09-18 11:30:06 +00:00
Gengliang Wang 1bad04d028 Preparing development version 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT 2021-08-31 17:04:14 +00:00
Gengliang Wang 03f5d23e96 Preparing Spark release v3.2.0-rc2 2021-08-31 17:04:08 +00:00
Gengliang Wang 69be513c5e Preparing development version 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT 2021-08-20 12:40:47 +00:00
Gengliang Wang 6bb3523d8e Preparing Spark release v3.2.0-rc1 2021-08-20 12:40:40 +00:00
Gengliang Wang fafdc1482b Revert "Preparing Spark release v3.2.0-rc1"
This reverts commit 8e58fafb05.
2021-08-20 20:07:02 +08:00
Gengliang Wang c829ed53ff Revert "Preparing development version 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT"
This reverts commit 4f1d21571d.
2021-08-20 20:07:01 +08:00
Gengliang Wang 4f1d21571d Preparing development version 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT 2021-08-19 14:08:32 +00:00
Gengliang Wang 8e58fafb05 Preparing Spark release v3.2.0-rc1 2021-08-19 14:08:26 +00:00
HyukjinKwon 8a1e172b51 [SPARK-34520][CORE] Remove unused SecurityManager references
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is kind of a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24033 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30945.
Many of references in `SecurityManager` were introduced from SPARK-1189, and related usages were removed later from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24033 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30945. This PR proposes to remove them out.

### Why are the changes needed?

For better readability of codes.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev-only.

### How was this patch tested?

Manually complied. GitHub Actions and Jenkins build should test it out as well.

Closes #31636 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34520.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2021-02-24 20:38:03 -08:00
HyukjinKwon 830249284d [SPARK-34059][SQL][CORE] Use for/foreach rather than map to make sure execute it eagerly
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is basically a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14332.
Calling `map` alone might leave it not executed due to lazy evaluation, e.g.)

```
scala> val foo = Seq(1,2,3)
foo: Seq[Int] = List(1, 2, 3)

scala> foo.map(println)
1
2
3
res0: Seq[Unit] = List((), (), ())

scala> foo.view.map(println)
res1: scala.collection.SeqView[Unit,Seq[_]] = SeqViewM(...)

scala> foo.view.foreach(println)
1
2
3
```

We should better use `foreach` to make sure it's executed where the output is unused or `Unit`.

### Why are the changes needed?

To prevent the potential issues by not executing `map`.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, the current codes look not causing any problem for now.

### How was this patch tested?

I found these item by running IntelliJ inspection, double checked one by one, and fixed them. These should be all instances across the codebase ideally.

Closes #31110 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34059.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
2021-01-10 15:22:24 -08:00
David McWhorter 87c58367cd [SPARK-22256][MESOS] Introduce spark.mesos.driver.memoryOverhead
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a simple change to support allocating a specified amount of overhead memory for the driver's mesos container.  This is already supported for executors.

### Why are the changes needed?
This is needed to keep the driver process from exceeding memory limits and being killed off when running on mesos.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it adds a `spark.mesos.driver.memoryOverhead` configuration option.  Documentation changes for this option are included in the PR.

### How was this patch tested?
Test cases covering allocation of driver memory overhead are included in the changes.

### Other notes
This is a second attempt to get this change reviewed, accepted and merged.  The original pull request was closed as stale back in January: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21006.
For this pull request, I took the original change by pmackles, rebased it onto the current master branch, and added a test case that was requested in the original code review.
I'm happy to make any further edits or do anything needed so that this can be included in a future spark release.  I keep having to build custom spark distributions so that we can use spark within our mesos clusters.

Closes #30739 from dmcwhorter/dmcwhorter-SPARK-22256.

Lead-authored-by: David McWhorter <david_mcwhorter@premierinc.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Mackles <pmackles@adobe.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-12-15 14:00:38 -08:00
Dongjoon Hyun de9818f043
[SPARK-33662][BUILD] Setting version to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to update `master` branch version to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT.

### Why are the changes needed?

Start to prepare Apache Spark 3.2.0.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

N/A.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the CIs.

Closes #30606 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-3.2.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-12-04 14:10:42 -08:00
yangjie01 084d38b64e [SPARK-33557][CORE][MESOS][TEST] Ensure the relationship between STORAGE_BLOCKMANAGER_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT and NETWORK_TIMEOUT
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As described in SPARK-33557, `HeartbeatReceiver` and `MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend` will always use `Network.NETWORK_TIMEOUT.defaultValueString` as value of `STORAGE_BLOCKMANAGER_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT` when we configure `NETWORK_TIMEOUT` without configure `STORAGE_BLOCKMANAGER_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT`, this is different from the relationship described in `configuration.md`.

To fix this problem,the main change of this pr as follow:

- Remove the explicitly default value of `STORAGE_BLOCKMANAGER_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT`

- Use actual value of `NETWORK_TIMEOUT` as `STORAGE_BLOCKMANAGER_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT` when `STORAGE_BLOCKMANAGER_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT` not configured in `HeartbeatReceiver` and `MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend`

### Why are the changes needed?
To ensure the relationship between `NETWORK_TIMEOUT` and  `STORAGE_BLOCKMANAGER_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT` as we described in `configuration.md`

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?

- Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action

- Manual test configure `NETWORK_TIMEOUT` and `STORAGE_BLOCKMANAGER_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT` locally

Closes #30547 from LuciferYang/SPARK-33557.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-12-02 18:41:49 +09:00
HyukjinKwon 1a042cc414 [SPARK-33530][CORE] Support --archives and spark.archives option natively
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

TL;DR:
- This PR completes the support of archives in Spark itself instead of Yarn-only
  - It makes `--archives` option work in other cluster modes too and adds `spark.archives` configuration.
-  After this PR, PySpark users can leverage Conda to ship Python packages together as below:
    ```python
    conda create -y -n pyspark_env -c conda-forge pyarrow==2.0.0 pandas==1.1.4 conda-pack==0.5.0
    conda activate pyspark_env
    conda pack -f -o pyspark_env.tar.gz
    PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON=python PYSPARK_PYTHON=./environment/bin/python pyspark --archives pyspark_env.tar.gz#environment
   ```
- Issue a warning that undocumented and hidden behavior of partial archive handling in `spark.files` / `SparkContext.addFile` will be deprecated, and users can use `spark.archives` and `SparkContext.addArchive`.

This PR proposes to add Spark's native `--archives` in Spark submit, and `spark.archives` configuration. Currently, both are supported only in Yarn mode:

```bash
./bin/spark-submit --help
```

```
Options:
...
 Spark on YARN only:
  --queue QUEUE_NAME          The YARN queue to submit to (Default: "default").
  --archives ARCHIVES         Comma separated list of archives to be extracted into the
                              working directory of each executor.
```

This `archives` feature is useful often when you have to ship a directory and unpack into executors. One example is native libraries to use e.g. JNI. Another example is to ship Python packages together by Conda environment.

Especially for Conda, PySpark currently does not have a nice way to ship a package that works in general, please see also https://hyukjin-spark.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user_guide/python_packaging.html#using-zipped-virtual-environment (PySpark new documentation demo for 3.1.0).

The neatest way is arguably to use Conda environment by shipping zipped Conda environment but this is currently dependent on this archive feature. NOTE that we are able to use `spark.files` by relying on its undocumented behaviour that untars `tar.gz` but I don't think we should document such ways and promote people to more rely on it.

Also, note that this PR does not target to add the feature parity of `spark.files.overwrite`, `spark.files.useFetchCache`, etc. yet. I documented that this is an experimental feature as well.

### Why are the changes needed?

To complete the feature parity, and to provide a better support of shipping Python libraries together with Conda env.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, this makes `--archives` works in Spark instead of Yarn-only, and adds a new configuration `spark.archives`.

### How was this patch tested?

I added unittests. Also, manually tested in standalone cluster, local-cluster, and local modes.

Closes #30486 from HyukjinKwon/native-archive.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-12-01 13:43:02 +09:00
Josh Soref 13fd272cd3 Spelling r common dev mlib external project streaming resource managers python
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR intends to fix typos in the sub-modules:
* `R`
* `common`
* `dev`
* `mlib`
* `external`
* `project`
* `streaming`
* `resource-managers`
* `python`

Split per srowen https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30323#issuecomment-728981618

NOTE: The misspellings have been reported at 706a726f87 (commitcomment-44064356)

### Why are the changes needed?

Misspelled words make it harder to read / understand content.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

There are various fixes to documentation, etc...

### How was this patch tested?

No testing was performed

Closes #30402 from jsoref/spelling-R_common_dev_mlib_external_project_streaming_resource-managers_python.

Authored-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
2020-11-27 10:22:45 -06:00
Dongjoon Hyun 3ce4ab545b
[SPARK-33513][BUILD] Upgrade to Scala 2.13.4 to improve exhaustivity
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims the followings.
1. Upgrade from Scala 2.13.3 to 2.13.4 for Apache Spark 3.1
2. Fix exhaustivity issues in both Scala 2.12/2.13 (Scala 2.13.4 requires this for compilation.)
3. Enforce the improved exhaustive check by using the existing Scala 2.13 GitHub Action compilation job.

### Why are the changes needed?

Scala 2.13.4 is a maintenance release for 2.13 line and improves JDK 15 support.
- https://github.com/scala/scala/releases/tag/v2.13.4

Also, it improves exhaustivity check.
- https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/9140 (Check exhaustivity of pattern matches with "if" guards and custom extractors)
- https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/9147 (Check all bindings exhaustively, e.g. tuples components)

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yep. Although it's a maintenance version change, it's a Scala version change.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the CIs and do the manual testing.
- Scala 2.12 CI jobs(GitHub Action/Jenkins UT/Jenkins K8s IT) to check the validity of code change.
- Scala 2.13 Compilation job to check the compilation

Closes #30455 from dongjoon-hyun/SCALA_3.13.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-23 16:28:43 -08:00
yangjie01 e3058ba17c [SPARK-33441][BUILD] Add unused-imports compilation check and remove all unused-imports
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr add a new Scala compile arg to `pom.xml` to defense against new unused imports:

- `-Ywarn-unused-import` for Scala 2.12
- `-Wconf:cat=unused-imports:e` for Scala 2.13

The other fIles change are remove all unused imports in Spark code

### Why are the changes needed?
Cleanup code and add guarantee to defense against new unused imports

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action

Closes #30351 from LuciferYang/remove-imports-core-module.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-11-19 14:20:39 +09:00
Pascal Gillet 9ab0f82a59
[SPARK-23499][MESOS] Support for priority queues in Mesos scheduler
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

I push this PR as I could not re-open the stale one https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20665 .

As for Yarn or Kubernetes, Mesos users should be able to specify priority queues to define a workload management policy for queued drivers in the Mesos Cluster Dispatcher.

This would ensure scheduling order while enqueuing Spark applications for a Mesos cluster.

### Why are the changes needed?

Currently, submitted drivers are kept in order of their submission: the first driver added to the queue will be the first one to be executed (FIFO), regardless of their priority.

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/issues/SPARK-23499 for more details.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

The MesosClusterDispatcher UI shows now Spark jobs along with the queue to which they are submitted.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit tests.
Also, this feature has been in production for 3 years now as we use a modified Spark 2.4.0 since then.

Closes #30352 from pgillet/mesos-scheduler-priority-queue.

Lead-authored-by: Pascal Gillet <pascal.gillet@stack-labs.com>
Co-authored-by: pgillet <pascalgillet@ymail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-11-16 16:54:08 -08:00
Thomas Graves 72ad9dcd5d [SPARK-32037][CORE] Rename blacklisting feature
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

this PR renames the blacklisting feature. I ended up using  "excludeOnFailure" or "excluded" in most cases but there is a mix. I renamed the BlacklistTracker to HealthTracker, but for the TaskSetBlacklist HealthTracker didn't make sense to me since its not the health of the taskset itself but rather tracking the things its excluded on so I renamed it to be TaskSetExcludeList.  Everything else I tried to use the context and in most cases excluded made sense. It made more sense to me then blocked since you are basically excluding those executors and nodes from scheduling tasks on them. Then can be unexcluded later after timeouts and such. The configs I changed the name to use excludeOnFailure which I thought explained it.

I unfortunately couldn't get rid of some of them because its part of the event listener and history files.  To keep backwards compatibility I kept the events and some of the parsing so that the history server would still properly read older history files.  It is not forward compatible though - meaning a new application write the "Excluded" events so the older history server won't properly read display them as being blacklisted.

A few of the files below are showing up as deleted and recreated even though I did a git mv on them. I'm not sure why.

### Why are the changes needed?

get rid of problematic language

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Config name changes but the old configs still work but are deprecated.

### How was this patch tested?

updated tests and also manually tested the UI changes and manually tested the history server reading older versions of history files and vice versa.

Closes #29906 from tgravescs/SPARK-32037.

Lead-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
2020-10-30 17:16:53 -05:00
yangjie01 fe6d38d243 [SPARK-32987][MESOS] Pass all mesos module UTs in Scala 2.13
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The main change of this pr is add a manual sort to `defaultConf ++ driverConf` before constructing `--conf` options to ensure options has same order in Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.13.

### Why are the changes needed?
We need to support a Scala 2.13 build.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?

- Scala 2.12: Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action

- Scala 2.13: Pass GitHub 2.13 Build Action

Do the following:

```
dev/change-scala-version.sh 2.13
mvn clean install -DskipTests  -pl resource-managers/mesos -Pscala-2.13 -Pmesos -am
mvn test -pl resource-managers/mesos -Pscala-2.13 -Pmesos
```

**Before**
```
Tests: succeeded 106, failed 1, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
*** 1 TESTS FAILED ***
```

**After**

```
Tests: succeeded 107, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
All tests passed.
```

Closes #29865 from LuciferYang/SPARK-32987-2.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-09-24 08:25:24 -07:00
farhan5900 8749f2e87a [SPARK-32675][MESOS] --py-files option is appended without passing value for it
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR checks for the emptiness of `--py-files` value and uses it only if it is not empty.

### Why are the changes needed?
There is a bug in Mesos cluster mode REST Submission API. It is using `--py-files` option without specifying any value for the conf `spark.submit.pyFiles` by the user.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
* Submitting an application to a Mesos cluster:
`curl -X POST http://localhost:7077/v1/submissions/create --header "Content-Type:application/json" --data '{
"action": "CreateSubmissionRequest",
"appResource": "file:///opt/spark-3.0.0-bin-3.2.0/examples/jars/spark-examples_2.12-3.0.0.jar",
"clientSparkVersion": "3.0.0",
"appArgs": ["30"],
"environmentVariables": {},
"mainClass": "org.apache.spark.examples.SparkPi",
"sparkProperties": {
  "spark.jars": "file:///opt/spark-3.0.0-bin-3.2.0/examples/jars/spark-examples_2.12-3.0.0.jar",
  "spark.driver.supervise": "false",
  "spark.executor.memory": "512m",
  "spark.driver.memory": "512m",
  "spark.submit.deployMode": "cluster",
  "spark.app.name": "SparkPi",
  "spark.master": "mesos://localhost:5050"
}}'`
* It should be able to pick the correct class and run the job successfully.

Closes #29499 from farhan5900/SPARK-32675.

Authored-by: farhan5900 <farhan5900@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-08-23 17:24:10 -07:00
Sean Owen be2eca22e9 [SPARK-32398][TESTS][CORE][STREAMING][SQL][ML] Update to scalatest 3.2.0 for Scala 2.13.3+
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Updates to scalatest 3.2.0. Though it looks large, it is 99% changes to the new location of scalatest classes.

### Why are the changes needed?

3.2.0+ has a fix that is required for Scala 2.13.3+ compatibility.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, only affects tests.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes #29196 from srowen/SPARK-32398.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-07-23 16:20:17 -07:00
Sean Owen ee624821a9 [SPARK-29292][YARN][K8S][MESOS] Fix Scala 2.13 compilation for remaining modules
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

See again the related PRs like https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28971
This completes fixing compilation for 2.13 for all but `repl`, which is a separate task.

### Why are the changes needed?

Eventually, we need to support a Scala 2.13 build, perhaps in Spark 3.1.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests. (2.13 was not tested; this is about getting it to compile without breaking 2.12)

Closes #29147 from srowen/SPARK-29292.4.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
2020-07-18 15:08:00 -07:00
Erik Krogen cf22d947fb [SPARK-32036] Replace references to blacklist/whitelist language with more appropriate terminology, excluding the blacklisting feature
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR will remove references to these "blacklist" and "whitelist" terms besides the blacklisting feature as a whole, which can be handled in a separate JIRA/PR.

This touches quite a few files, but the changes are straightforward (variable/method/etc. name changes) and most quite self-contained.

### Why are the changes needed?

As per discussion on the Spark dev list, it will be beneficial to remove references to problematic language that can alienate potential community members. One such reference is "blacklist" and "whitelist". While it seems to me that there is some valid debate as to whether these terms have racist origins, the cultural connotations are inescapable in today's world.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

In the test file `HiveQueryFileTest`, a developer has the ability to specify the system property `spark.hive.whitelist` to specify a list of Hive query files that should be tested. This system property has been renamed to `spark.hive.includelist`. The old property has been kept for compatibility, but will log a warning if used. I am open to feedback from others on whether keeping a deprecated property here is unnecessary given that this is just for developers running tests.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests should be suitable since no behavior changes are expected as a result of this PR.

Closes #28874 from xkrogen/xkrogen-SPARK-32036-rename-blacklists.

Authored-by: Erik Krogen <ekrogen@linkedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
2020-07-15 11:40:55 -05:00
Holden Karau 90ac9f975b [SPARK-32004][ALL] Drop references to slave
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This change replaces the world slave with alternatives matching the context.

### Why are the changes needed?

There is no need to call things slave, we might as well use better clearer names.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, the ouput JSON does change. To allow backwards compatibility this is an additive change.
The shell scripts for starting & stopping workers are renamed, and for backwards compatibility old scripts are added to call through to the new ones while printing a deprecation message to stderr.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes #28864 from holdenk/SPARK-32004-drop-references-to-slave.

Lead-authored-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Holden Karau <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
2020-07-13 14:05:33 -07:00
Nicholas Marcott 8b4862953a [SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

[Delay scheduling](http://elmeleegy.com/khaled/papers/delay_scheduling.pdf) is an optimization that sacrifices fairness for data locality in order to improve cluster and workload throughput.

One useful definition of "delay" here is how much time has passed since the TaskSet was using its fair share of resources.

However it is impractical to calculate this delay, as it would require running simulations assuming no delay scheduling. Tasks would be run in different orders with different run times.

Currently the heuristic used to estimate this delay is the time since a task was last launched for a TaskSet. The problem is that it essentially does not account for resource utilization, potentially leaving the cluster heavily underutilized.

This PR modifies the heuristic in an attempt to move closer to the useful definition of delay above.
The newly proposed delay is the time since a TasksSet last launched a task **and** did not reject any resources due to delay scheduling when offered its "fair share".

See the last comments of #26696 for more discussion.

### Why are the changes needed?

cluster can become heavily underutilized as described in [SPARK-18886](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18886?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20text%20~%20delay)

### How was this patch tested?

TaskSchedulerImplSuite

cloud-fan
tgravescs
squito

Closes #27207 from bmarcott/nmarcott-fulfill-slots-2.

Authored-by: Nicholas Marcott <481161+bmarcott@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2020-04-09 11:00:29 +00:00
Thomas Graves 474b1bb5c2 [SPARK-29154][CORE] Update Spark scheduler for stage level scheduling
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is the core scheduler changes to support Stage level scheduling.

The main changes here include modification to the DAGScheduler to look at the ResourceProfiles associated with an RDD and have those applied inside the scheduler.
Currently if multiple RDD's in a stage have conflicting ResourceProfiles we throw an error. logic to allow this will happen in SPARK-29153. I added the interfaces to RDD to add and get the REsourceProfile so that I could add unit tests for the scheduler. These are marked as private for now until we finish the feature and will be exposed in SPARK-29150. If you think this is confusing I can remove those and remove the tests and add them back later.
I modified the task scheduler to make sure to only schedule on executor that exactly match the resource profile. It will then check those executors to make sure the current resources meet the task needs before assigning it.  In here I changed the way we do the custom resource assignment.
Other changes here include having the cpus per task passed around so that we can properly account for them. Previously we just used the one global config, but now it can change based on the ResourceProfile.
I removed the exceptions that require the cores to be the limiting resource. With this change all the places I found that used executor cores /task cpus as slots has been updated to use the ResourceProfile logic and look to see what resource is limiting.

### Why are the changes needed?

Stage level sheduling feature

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

unit tests and lots of manual testing

Closes #27773 from tgravescs/SPARK-29154.

Lead-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
2020-03-26 09:46:36 -05:00
Dale Clarke 2a4fed0443 [SPARK-30654][WEBUI] Bootstrap4 WebUI upgrade
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark's Web UI is using an older version of Bootstrap (v. 2.3.2) for the portal pages. Bootstrap 2.x was moved to EOL in Aug 2013 and Bootstrap 3.x was moved to EOL in July 2019 (https://github.com/twbs/release). Older versions of Bootstrap are also getting flagged in security scans for various CVEs:

https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BOOTSTRAP-72889
https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BOOTSTRAP-173700
https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:bootstrap:20180529
https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:bootstrap:20160627

I haven't validated each CVE, but it would be nice to resolve any potential issues and get on a supported release.

The bad news is that there have been quite a few changes between Bootstrap 2 and Bootstrap 4. I've tried updating the library, refactoring/tweaking the CSS and JS to maintain a similar appearance and functionality, and testing the UI for functionality and appearance. This is a fairly large change so I'm sure additional testing and fixes will be needed.

### How was this patch tested?
This has been manually tested, but there is a ton of functionality and there are many pages and detail pages so it is very possible bugs introduced from the upgrade were missed. Additional testing and feedback is welcomed. If it appears a whole page was missed let me know and I'll take a pass at addressing that page/section.

Closes #27370 from clarkead/bootstrap4-core-upgrade.

Authored-by: Dale Clarke <a.dale.clarke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
2020-03-13 15:24:48 -07:00
beliefer 1cd80fa9fa [SPARK-31109][MESOS][DOC] Add version information to the configuration of Mesos
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add version information to the configuration of `Mesos`.

I sorted out some information show below.

Item name | Since version | JIRA ID | Commit ID | Note
-- | -- | -- | -- | --
spark.mesos.$taskType.secret.names | 2.3.0 | SPARK-22131 | 5415963d2caaf95604211419ffc4e29fff38e1d7#diff-91e6e5f871160782dc50d4060d6faea3 |  
spark.mesos.$taskType.secret.values | 2.3.0 | SPARK-22131 | 5415963d2caaf95604211419ffc4e29fff38e1d7#diff-91e6e5f871160782dc50d4060d6faea3 |  
spark.mesos.$taskType.secret.envkeys | 2.3.0 | SPARK-22131 | 5415963d2caaf95604211419ffc4e29fff38e1d7#diff-91e6e5f871160782dc50d4060d6faea3 |  
spark.mesos.$taskType.secret.filenames | 2.3.0 | SPARK-22131 | 5415963d2caaf95604211419ffc4e29fff38e1d7#diff-91e6e5f871160782dc50d4060d6faea3 |  
spark.mesos.principal | 1.5.0 | SPARK-6284 | d86bbb4e286f16f77ba125452b07827684eafeed#diff-02a6d899f7a529eb7cfbb12182a110b0 |  
spark.mesos.principal.file | 2.4.0 | SPARK-16501 | 7f10cf83f311526737fc96d5bb8281d12e41932f#diff-daf48dabbe58afaeed8787751750b01d |  
spark.mesos.secret | 1.5.0 | SPARK-6284 | d86bbb4e286f16f77ba125452b07827684eafeed#diff-02a6d899f7a529eb7cfbb12182a110b0 |  
spark.mesos.secret.file | 2.4.0 | SPARK-16501 | 7f10cf83f311526737fc96d5bb8281d12e41932f#diff-daf48dabbe58afaeed8787751750b01d |  
spark.shuffle.cleaner.interval | 2.0.0 | SPARK-12583 | 310981d49a332bd329303f610b150bbe02cf5f87#diff-2fafefee94f2a2023ea9765536870258 |  
spark.mesos.dispatcher.webui.url | 2.0.0 | SPARK-13492 | a4a0addccffb7cd0ece7947d55ce2538afa54c97#diff-f541460c7a74cee87cbb460b3b01665e |  
spark.mesos.dispatcher.historyServer.url | 2.1.0 | SPARK-16809 | 62e62124419f3fa07b324f5e42feb2c5b4fde715#diff-3779e2035d9a09fa5f6af903925b9512 |  
spark.mesos.driver.labels | 2.3.0 | SPARK-21000 | 8da3f7041aafa71d7596b531625edb899970fec2#diff-91e6e5f871160782dc50d4060d6faea3 |  
spark.mesos.driver.webui.url | 2.0.0 | SPARK-13492 | a4a0addccffb7cd0ece7947d55ce2538afa54c97#diff-e3a5e67b8de2069ce99801372e214b8e |  
spark.mesos.driver.failoverTimeout | 2.3.0 | SPARK-21456 | c42ef953343073a50ef04c5ce848b574ff7f2238#diff-91e6e5f871160782dc50d4060d6faea3 |  
spark.mesos.network.name | 2.1.0 | SPARK-18232 | d89bfc92302424406847ac7a9cfca714e6b742fc#diff-ab5bf34f1951a8f7ea83c9456a6c3ab7 |  
spark.mesos.network.labels | 2.3.0 | SPARK-21694 | ce0d3bb377766bdf4df7852272557ae846408877#diff-91e6e5f871160782dc50d4060d6faea3 |  
spark.mesos.driver.constraints | 2.2.1 | SPARK-19606 | f6ee3d90d5c299e67ae6e2d553c16c0d9759d4b5#diff-91e6e5f871160782dc50d4060d6faea3 |  
spark.mesos.driver.frameworkId | 2.1.0 | SPARK-16809 | 62e62124419f3fa07b324f5e42feb2c5b4fde715#diff-02a6d899f7a529eb7cfbb12182a110b0 |  
spark.executor.uri | 0.8.0 | None | 46eecd110a4017ea0c86cbb1010d0ccd6a5eb2ef#diff-a885e7df97790e9b59c21c63353e7476 |  
spark.mesos.proxy.baseURL | 2.3.0 | SPARK-13041 | 663f30d14a0c9219e07697af1ab56e11a714d9a6#diff-0b9b4e122eb666155aa189a4321a6ca8 |  
spark.mesos.coarse | 0.6.0 | None | 63051dd2bcc4bf09d413ff7cf89a37967edc33ba#diff-eaf125f56ce786d64dcef99cf446a751 |  
spark.mesos.coarse.shutdownTimeout | 2.0.0 | SPARK-12330 | c756bda477f458ba4aad7fdb2026263507e0ad9b#diff-d425d35aa23c47a62fbb538554f2f2cf |  
spark.mesos.maxDrivers | 1.4.0 | SPARK-5338 | 53befacced828bbac53c6e3a4976ec3f036bae9e#diff-b964c449b99c51f0a5fd77270b2951a4 |  
spark.mesos.retainedDrivers | 1.4.0 | SPARK-5338 | 53befacced828bbac53c6e3a4976ec3f036bae9e#diff-b964c449b99c51f0a5fd77270b2951a4 |  
spark.mesos.cluster.retry.wait.max | 1.4.0 | SPARK-5338 | 53befacced828bbac53c6e3a4976ec3f036bae9e#diff-b964c449b99c51f0a5fd77270b2951a4 |  
spark.mesos.fetcherCache.enable | 2.1.0 | SPARK-15994 | e34b4e12673fb76c92f661d7c03527410857a0f8#diff-772ea7311566edb25f11a4c4f882179a |  
spark.mesos.appJar.local.resolution.mode | 2.4.0 | SPARK-24326 | 22df953f6bb191858053eafbabaa5b3ebca29f56#diff-6e4d0a0445975f03f975fdc1e3d80e49 |  
spark.mesos.rejectOfferDuration | 2.2.0 | SPARK-19702 | 2e30c0b9bcaa6f7757bd85d1f1ec392d5f916f83#diff-daf48dabbe58afaeed8787751750b01d |  
spark.mesos.rejectOfferDurationForUnmetConstraints | 1.6.0 | SPARK-10471 | 74f50275e429e649212928a9f36552941b862edc#diff-02a6d899f7a529eb7cfbb12182a110b0 |  
spark.mesos.rejectOfferDurationForReachedMaxCores | 2.0.0 | SPARK-13001 | 1e7d9bfb5a41f5c2479ab3b4d4081f00bf00bd31#diff-02a6d899f7a529eb7cfbb12182a110b0 |  
spark.mesos.uris | 1.5.0 | SPARK-8798 | a2f805729b401c68b60bd690ad02533b8db57b58#diff-e3a5e67b8de2069ce99801372e214b8e |  
spark.mesos.executor.home | 1.1.1 | SPARK-3264 | 069ecfef02c4af69fc0d3755bd78be321b68b01d#diff-e3a5e67b8de2069ce99801372e214b8e |  
spark.mesos.mesosExecutor.cores | 1.4.0 | SPARK-6350 | 6fbeb82e13db7117d8f216e6148632490a4bc5be#diff-e3a5e67b8de2069ce99801372e214b8e |  
spark.mesos.extra.cores | 0.6.0 | None | 2d761e3353651049f6707c74bb5ffdd6e86f6f35#diff-37af8c6e3634f97410ade813a5172621 |  
spark.mesos.executor.memoryOverhead | 1.1.1 | SPARK-3535 | 6f150978477830bbc14ba983786dd2bce12d1fe2#diff-6b498f5407d10e848acac4a1b182457c |  
spark.mesos.executor.docker.image | 1.4.0 | SPARK-2691 | 8f50a07d2188ccc5315d979755188b1e5d5b5471#diff-e3a5e67b8de2069ce99801372e214b8e |  
spark.mesos.executor.docker.forcePullImage | 2.1.0 | SPARK-15271 | 978cd5f125eb5a410bad2e60bf8385b11cf1b978#diff-0dd025320c7ecda2ea310ed7172d7f5a |  
spark.mesos.executor.docker.portmaps | 1.4.0 | SPARK-7373 | 226033cfffa2f37ebaf8bc2c653f094e91ef0c9b#diff-b964c449b99c51f0a5fd77270b2951a4 |  
spark.mesos.executor.docker.parameters | 2.2.0 | SPARK-19740 | a888fed3099e84c2cf45e9419f684a3658ada19d#diff-4139e6605a8c7f242f65cde538770c99 |  
spark.mesos.executor.docker.volumes | 1.4.0 | SPARK-7373 | 226033cfffa2f37ebaf8bc2c653f094e91ef0c9b#diff-b964c449b99c51f0a5fd77270b2951a4 |  
spark.mesos.gpus.max | 2.1.0 | SPARK-14082 | 29f186bfdf929b1e8ffd8e33ee37b76d5dc5af53#diff-d427ee890b913c5a7056be21eb4f39d7 |  
spark.mesos.task.labels | 2.2.0 | SPARK-20085 | c8fc1f3badf61bcfc4bd8eeeb61f73078ca068d1#diff-387c5d0c916278495fc28420571adf9e |  
spark.mesos.constraints | 1.5.0 | SPARK-6707 | 1165b17d24cdf1dbebb2faca14308dfe5c2a652c#diff-e3a5e67b8de2069ce99801372e214b8e |  
spark.mesos.containerizer | 2.1.0 | SPARK-16637 | 266b92faffb66af24d8ed2725beb80770a2d91f8#diff-0dd025320c7ecda2ea310ed7172d7f5a |  
spark.mesos.role | 1.5.0 | SPARK-6284 | d86bbb4e286f16f77ba125452b07827684eafeed#diff-02a6d899f7a529eb7cfbb12182a110b0 |  
The following appears in the document |   |   |   |  
spark.mesos.driverEnv.[EnvironmentVariableName] | 2.1.0 | SPARK-16194 | 235cb256d06653bcde4c3ed6b081503a94996321#diff-b964c449b99c51f0a5fd77270b2951a4 |  
spark.mesos.dispatcher.driverDefault.[PropertyName] | 2.1.0 | SPARK-16927 and SPARK-16923 | eca58755fbbc11937b335ad953a3caff89b818e6#diff-b964c449b99c51f0a5fd77270b2951a4 |  

### Why are the changes needed?
Supplemental configuration version information.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
'No'.

### How was this patch tested?
Exists UT

Closes #27863 from beliefer/add-version-to-mesos-config.

Authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-03-12 11:02:29 +09:00
gatorsmile 28b8713036 [SPARK-30950][BUILD] Setting version to 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch is to bump the master branch version to 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT.

### Why are the changes needed?
N/A

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
N/A

### How was this patch tested?
N/A

Closes #27698 from gatorsmile/updateVersion.

Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2020-02-25 19:44:31 -08:00
Thomas Graves 496f6ac860 [SPARK-29148][CORE] Add stage level scheduling dynamic allocation and scheduler backend changes
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is another PR for stage level scheduling. In particular this adds changes to the dynamic allocation manager and the scheduler backend to be able to track what executors are needed per ResourceProfile.  Note the api is still private to Spark until the entire feature gets in, so this functionality will be there but only usable by tests for profiles other then the DefaultProfile.

The main changes here are simply tracking things on a ResourceProfile basis as well as sending the executor requests to the scheduler backend for all ResourceProfiles.

I introduce a ResourceProfileManager in this PR that will track all the actual ResourceProfile objects so that we can keep them all in a single place and just pass around and use in datastructures the resource profile id. The resource profile id can be used with the ResourceProfileManager to get the actual ResourceProfile contents.

There are various places in the code that use executor "slots" for things.  The ResourceProfile adds functionality to keep that calculation in it.   This logic is more complex then it should due to standalone mode and mesos coarse grained not setting the executor cores config. They default to all cores on the worker, so calculating slots is harder there.
This PR keeps the functionality to make the cores the limiting resource because the scheduler still uses that for "slots" for a few things.

This PR does also add the resource profile id to the Stage and stage info classes to be able to test things easier.   That full set of changes will come with the scheduler PR that will be after this one.

The PR stops at the scheduler backend pieces for the cluster manager and the real YARN support hasn't been added in this PR, that again will be in a separate PR, so this has a few of the API changes up to the cluster manager and then just uses the default profile requests to continue.

The code for the entire feature is here for reference: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27053/files although it needs to be upmerged again as well.

### Why are the changes needed?

Needed for stage level scheduling feature.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No user facing api changes added here.

### How was this patch tested?

Lots of unit tests and manually testing. I tested on yarn, k8s, standalone, local modes. Ran both failure and success cases.

Closes #27313 from tgravescs/SPARK-29148.

Authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
2020-02-12 16:45:42 -06:00
Thomas Graves 3d2b8d8b13 [SPARK-30638][CORE] Add resources allocated to PluginContext
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add the allocated resources to parameters to the PluginContext so that any plugins in driver or executor could use this information to initialize devices or use this information in a useful manner.

### Why are the changes needed?

To allow users to initialize/track devices once at the executor level before each task runs to use them.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Yes to the people using the Executor/Driver plugin interface.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit tests and manually by writing a plugin that initialized GPU's using this interface.

Closes #27367 from tgravescs/pluginWithResources.

Lead-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
2020-01-31 08:25:32 -06:00
Thomas Graves 6dbfa2bb9c [SPARK-29306][CORE] Stage Level Sched: Executors need to track what ResourceProfile they are created with
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is the second PR for the Stage Level Scheduling. This is adding in the necessary executor side changes:
1) executors to know what ResourceProfile they should be using
2) handle parsing the resource profile settings - these are not in the global configs
3) then reporting back to the driver what resource profile it was started with.

This PR adds all the piping for YARN to pass the information all the way to executors, but it just uses the default ResourceProfile (which is the global applicatino level configs).

At a high level these changes include:
1) adding a new --resourceProfileId option to the CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend
2) Add the ResourceProfile settings to new internal confs that gets passed into the Executor
3) Executor changes that use the resource profile id passed in to read the corresponding ResourceProfile confs and then parse those requests and discover resources as necessary
4) Executor registers to Driver with the Resource profile id so that the ExecutorMonitor can track how many executor with each profile are running
5) YARN side changes to show that passing the resource profile id and confs actually works. Just uses the DefaultResourceProfile for now.

I also removed a check from the CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend that used to check to make sure there were task requirements before parsing any custom resource executor requests.  With the resource profiles this becomes much more expensive because we would then have to pass the task requests to each executor and the check was just a short cut and not really needed. It was much cleaner just to remove it.

Note there were some changes to the ResourceProfile, ExecutorResourceRequests, and TaskResourceRequests in this PR as well because I discovered some issues with things not being immutable. That api now look like:

val rpBuilder = new ResourceProfileBuilder()
val ereq = new ExecutorResourceRequests()
val treq = new TaskResourceRequests()

ereq.cores(2).memory("6g").memoryOverhead("2g").pysparkMemory("2g").resource("gpu", 2, "/home/tgraves/getGpus")
treq.cpus(2).resource("gpu", 2)

val resourceProfile = rpBuilder.require(ereq).require(treq).build

This makes is so that ResourceProfile is immutable and Spark can use it directly without worrying about the user changing it.

### Why are the changes needed?

These changes are needed for the executor to report which ResourceProfile they are using so that ultimately the dynamic allocation manager can use that information to know how many with a profile are running and how many more it needs to request.  Its also needed to get the resource profile confs to the executor so that it can run the appropriate discovery script if needed.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Unit tests and manually on YARN.

Closes #26682 from tgravescs/SPARK-29306.

Authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
2020-01-17 08:15:25 -06:00
Yuming Wang 696288f623 [INFRA] Reverts commit 56dcd79 and c216ef1
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Revert "Preparing development version 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT": 56dcd79

2. Revert "Preparing Spark release v3.0.0-preview2-rc2": c216ef1

### Why are the changes needed?
Shouldn't change master.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
manual test:
https://github.com/apache/spark/compare/5de5e46..wangyum:revert-master

Closes #26915 from wangyum/revert-master.

Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
2019-12-16 19:57:44 -07:00
Yuming Wang 56dcd79992 Preparing development version 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT 2019-12-17 01:57:27 +00:00
Yuming Wang c216ef1d03 Preparing Spark release v3.0.0-preview2-rc2 2019-12-17 01:57:21 +00:00
Sean Owen 1febd373ea [MINOR][TESTS] Replace JVM assert with JUnit Assert in tests
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Use JUnit assertions in tests uniformly, not JVM assert() statements.

### Why are the changes needed?

assert() statements do not produce as useful errors when they fail, and, if they were somehow disabled, would fail to test anything.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No. The assertion logic should be identical.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes #26581 from srowen/assertToJUnit.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
2019-11-20 14:04:15 -06:00
Xingbo Jiang 8207c835b4 Revert "Prepare Spark release v3.0.0-preview-rc2"
This reverts commit 007c873ae3.
2019-10-30 17:45:44 -07:00
Xingbo Jiang 007c873ae3 Prepare Spark release v3.0.0-preview-rc2
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

To push the built jars to maven release repository, we need to remove the 'SNAPSHOT' tag from the version name.

Made the following changes in this PR:
* Update all the `3.0.0-SNAPSHOT` version name to `3.0.0-preview`
* Update the sparkR version number check logic to allow jvm version like `3.0.0-preview`

**Please note those changes were generated by the release script in the past, but this time since we manually add tags on master branch, we need to manually apply those changes too.**

We shall revert the changes after 3.0.0-preview release passed.

### Why are the changes needed?

To make the maven release repository to accept the built jars.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

N/A
2019-10-30 17:42:59 -07:00
Xingbo Jiang b33a58c0c6 Revert "Prepare Spark release v3.0.0-preview-rc1"
This reverts commit 5eddbb5f1d.
2019-10-28 22:32:34 -07:00
Xingbo Jiang 5eddbb5f1d Prepare Spark release v3.0.0-preview-rc1
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

To push the built jars to maven release repository, we need to remove the 'SNAPSHOT' tag from the version name.

Made the following changes in this PR:
* Update all the `3.0.0-SNAPSHOT` version name to `3.0.0-preview`
* Update the PySpark version from `3.0.0.dev0` to `3.0.0`

**Please note those changes were generated by the release script in the past, but this time since we manually add tags on master branch, we need to manually apply those changes too.**

We shall revert the changes after 3.0.0-preview release passed.

### Why are the changes needed?

To make the maven release repository to accept the built jars.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

N/A

Closes #26243 from jiangxb1987/3.0.0-preview-prepare.

Lead-authored-by: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
2019-10-28 22:31:29 -07:00
Sean Owen cc7493fa21 [SPARK-29416][CORE][ML][SQL][MESOS][TESTS] Use .sameElements to compare arrays, instead of .deep (gone in 2.13)
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Use `.sameElements` to compare (non-nested) arrays, as `Arrays.deep` is removed in 2.13 and wasn't the best way to do this in the first place.

### Why are the changes needed?

To compile with 2.13.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

None.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes #26073 from srowen/SPARK-29416.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-10-09 17:00:48 -07:00
Dongjoon Hyun bd031c2173 [SPARK-29307][BUILD][TESTS] Remove scalatest deprecation warnings
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to remove `scalatest` deprecation warnings with the following changes.
- `org.scalatest.mockito.MockitoSugar` -> `org.scalatestplus.mockito.MockitoSugar`
- `org.scalatest.selenium.WebBrowser` -> `org.scalatestplus.selenium.WebBrowser`
- `org.scalatest.prop.Checkers` -> `org.scalatestplus.scalacheck.Checkers`
- `org.scalatest.prop.GeneratorDrivenPropertyChecks` -> `org.scalatestplus.scalacheck.ScalaCheckDrivenPropertyChecks`

### Why are the changes needed?

According to the Jenkins logs, there are 118 warnings about this.
```
 grep "is deprecated" ~/consoleText | grep scalatest | wc -l
     118
```

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

After Jenkins passes, we need to check the Jenkins log.

Closes #25982 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29307.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-09-30 21:00:11 -07:00
Sean Owen e1ea806b30 [SPARK-29291][CORE][SQL][STREAMING][MLLIB] Change procedure-like declaration to function + Unit for 2.13
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Scala 2.13 emits a deprecation warning for procedure-like declarations:

```
def foo() {
 ...
```

This is equivalent to the following, so should be changed to avoid a warning:

```
def foo(): Unit = {
  ...
```

### Why are the changes needed?

It will avoid about a thousand compiler warnings when we start to support Scala 2.13. I wanted to make the change in 3.0 as there are less likely to be back-ports from 3.0 to 2.4 than 3.1 to 3.0, for example, minimizing that downside to touching so many files.

Unfortunately, that makes this quite a big change.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No behavior change at all.

### How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes #25968 from srowen/SPARK-29291.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-09-30 10:03:23 -07:00
turbofei eef5e6d348 [SPARK-29113][DOC] Fix some annotation errors and remove meaningless annotations in project
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In this PR, I fix some annotation errors and remove meaningless annotations in project.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are some annotation errors and meaningless annotations in project.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Verified manually.

Closes #25809 from turboFei/SPARK-29113.

Authored-by: turbofei <fwang12@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-09-18 13:12:18 +09:00
Anton Kirillov f17f1d01e2 [SPARK-28778][MESOS] Fixed executors advertised address when running in virtual network
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Resolves [SPARK-28778: Shuffle jobs fail due to incorrect advertised address when running in a virtual network on Mesos](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28778).

This patch fixes a bug which occurs when shuffle jobs are launched by Mesos in a virtual network. Mesos scheduler sets executor `--hostname` parameter to `0.0.0.0` in the case when `spark.mesos.network.name` is provided. This makes executors use `0.0.0.0` as their advertised address and, in the presence of shuffle, executors fail to fetch shuffle blocks from each other using `0.0.0.0` as the origin. When a virtual network is used the hostname or IP address is not known upfront and assigned to a container at its start time so the executor process needs to advertise the correct dynamically assigned address to be reachable by other executors.

Changes:
- added a fallback to `Utils.localHostName()` in Spark Executors when `--hostname` is not provided
- removed setting executor address to `0.0.0.0` from Mesos scheduler
- refactored the code related to building executor command in Mesos scheduler
- added network configuration support to Docker containerizer
- added unit tests

### Why are the changes needed?
The bug described above prevents Mesos users from running any jobs which involve shuffle due to the inability of executors to fetch shuffle blocks because of incorrect advertised address when virtual network is used.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
- added unit test to `MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackendSuite` which verifies the absence of `--hostname` parameter  when `spark.mesos.network.name` is provided and its presence otherwise
- added unit test to `MesosSchedulerBackendUtilSuite` which verifies that `MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.buildContainerInfo` sets network-related properties for Docker containerizer
- unit tests from this repo launched with profiles: `./build/mvn test -Pmesos -Pnetlib-lgpl -Psparkr -Phive -Phive-thriftserver`, build log attached: [mvn.test.log](https://github.com/apache/spark/files/3516891/mvn.test.log)
- integration tests from [DCOS Spark repo](https://github.com/mesosphere/spark-build), more specifically - [test_spark_cni.py](https://github.com/mesosphere/spark-build/blob/master/tests/test_spark_cni.py) which runs a specific [shuffle job](https://github.com/mesosphere/spark-build/blob/master/tests/jobs/scala/src/main/scala/ShuffleApp.scala) and verifies its successful completion, Mesos task network configuration, and IP addresses for both Mesos and Docker containerizers

Closes #25500 from akirillov/DCOS-45840-fix-advertised-ip-in-virtual-networks.

Authored-by: Anton Kirillov <akirillov@mesosophere.io>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
2019-08-23 18:30:05 -07:00