## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables assertions in `XXH64Suite.testKnownByteArrayInputs()` on big endian platform, too. The current implementation performs them only on little endian platform. This PR increase test coverage of big endian platform.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated `XXH64Suite`
Tested on big endian platform using JIT compiler or interpreter `-Xint`.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20804 from kiszk/SPARK-23656.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The error message ```s"""Field "$name" does not exist."""``` is thrown when looking up an unknown field in StructType. In the error message, we should also contain the information about which columns/fields exist in this struct.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests.
Note: I created a new `StructTypeSuite.scala` as I couldn't find an existing suite that's suitable to place these tests. I may be missing something so feel free to propose new locations.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Xiayun Sun <xiayunsun@gmail.com>
Closes#20649 from xysun/SPARK-23462.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The from_json() function accepts an additional parameter, where the user might specify the schema. The issue is that the specified schema might not be compatible with data. In particular, the JSON data might be missing data for fields declared as non-nullable in the schema. The from_json() function does not verify the data against such errors. When data with missing fields is sent to the parquet encoder, there is no verification either. The end results is a corrupt parquet file.
To avoid corruptions, make sure that all fields in the user-specified schema are set to be nullable.
Since this changes the behavior of a public function, we need to include it in release notes.
The behavior can be reverted by setting `spark.sql.fromJsonForceNullableSchema=false`
## How was this patch tested?
Added two new tests.
Author: Michał Świtakowski <michal.switakowski@databricks.com>
Closes#20694 from mswit-databricks/SPARK-23173.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`PrintToStderr` was doing what is it supposed to only when code generation is enabled.
The PR adds the same behavior in interpreted mode too.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20773 from mgaido91/SPARK-23602.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There was a bug in `calculateParamLength` which caused it to return always 1 + the number of expressions. This could lead to Exceptions especially with expressions of type long.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT + fixed previous UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20772 from mgaido91/SPARK-23628.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to DecodeUsingSerializer.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20760 from mgaido91/SPARK-23592.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a configuration to control the fallback of Arrow optimization for `toPandas` and `createDataFrame` with Pandas DataFrame.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and unit tests added.
You can test this by:
**`createDataFrame`**
```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", False)
pdf = spark.createDataFrame([[{'a': 1}]]).toPandas()
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", True)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled", True)
spark.createDataFrame(pdf, "a: map<string, int>")
```
```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", False)
pdf = spark.createDataFrame([[{'a': 1}]]).toPandas()
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", True)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled", False)
spark.createDataFrame(pdf, "a: map<string, int>")
```
**`toPandas`**
```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", True)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled", True)
spark.createDataFrame([[{'a': 1}]]).toPandas()
```
```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", True)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled", False)
spark.createDataFrame([[{'a': 1}]]).toPandas()
```
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#20678 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-23380-conf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to EncodeUsingSerializer.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20751 from mgaido91/SPARK-23591.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added a helper function in `ExpressionEvalHelper` to check exceptions in all the path of expression evaluation.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified the existing tests.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20748 from maropu/SPARK-23611.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to CreateExternalRow
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20749 from mgaido91/SPARK-23590.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added interpreted execution for `GetExternalRowField`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20746 from maropu/SPARK-23594.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to WrapOption.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20741 from mgaido91/SPARK-23586_2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to UnwrapOption.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20736 from mgaido91/SPARK-23586.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Provide more details in trigonometric function documentations. Referenced `java.lang.Math` for further details in the descriptions.
## How was this patch tested?
Ran full build, checked generated documentation manually
Author: Mihaly Toth <misutoth@gmail.com>
Closes#20618 from misutoth/trigonometric-doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A current `CodegenContext` class has immutable value or method without mutable state, too.
This refactoring moves them to `CodeGenerator` object class which can be accessed from anywhere without an instantiated `CodegenContext` in the program.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20700 from kiszk/SPARK-23546.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It looks like this was incorrectly copied from `XPathFloat` in the class above.
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Eric Liang <ekhliang@gmail.com>
Closes#20730 from ericl/fix-typo-xpath.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944 added one patch, which allowed a spark session to be created when the hive metastore server is down. However, it did not allow running any commands with the spark session. This brings troubles to the user who only wants to read / write data frames without metastore setup.
## How was this patch tested?
Added some unit tests to read and write data frames based on the original HiveMetastoreLazyInitializationSuite.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Feng Liu <fengliu@databricks.com>
Closes#20681 from liufengdb/completely-lazy.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
I run a sql: `select ls.cs_order_number from ls left semi join catalog_sales cs on ls.cs_order_number = cs.cs_order_number`, The `ls` table is a small table ,and the number is one. The `catalog_sales` table is a big table, and the number is 10 billion. The task will be hang up. And i find the many null values of `cs_order_number` in the `catalog_sales` table. I think the null value should be removed in the logical plan.
>== Optimized Logical Plan ==
>Join LeftSemi, (cs_order_number#1 = cs_order_number#22)
>:- Project cs_order_number#1
> : +- Filter isnotnull(cs_order_number#1)
> : +- MetastoreRelation 100t, ls
>+- Project cs_order_number#22
> +- MetastoreRelation 100t, catalog_sales
Now, use this patch, the plan will be:
>== Optimized Logical Plan ==
>Join LeftSemi, (cs_order_number#1 = cs_order_number#22)
>:- Project cs_order_number#1
> : +- Filter isnotnull(cs_order_number#1)
> : +- MetastoreRelation 100t, ls
>+- Project cs_order_number#22
> : **+- Filter isnotnull(cs_order_number#22)**
> :+- MetastoreRelation 100t, catalog_sales
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: KaiXinXiaoLei <584620569@qq.com>
Author: hanghang <584620569@qq.com>
Closes#20670 from KaiXinXiaoLei/Spark-23405.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clarify JSON and CSV reader behavior in document.
JSON doesn't support partial results for corrupted records.
CSV only supports partial results for the records with more or less tokens.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass existing tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20666 from viirya/SPARK-23448-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```Scala
val tablePath = new File(s"${path.getCanonicalPath}/cOl3=c/cOl1=a/cOl5=e")
Seq(("a", "b", "c", "d", "e")).toDF("cOl1", "cOl2", "cOl3", "cOl4", "cOl5")
.write.json(tablePath.getCanonicalPath)
val df = spark.read.json(path.getCanonicalPath).select("CoL1", "CoL5", "CoL3").distinct()
df.show()
```
It generates a wrong result.
```
[c,e,a]
```
We have a bug in the rule `OptimizeMetadataOnlyQuery `. We should respect the attribute order in the original leaf node. This PR is to fix it.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test case
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20684 from gatorsmile/optimizeMetadataOnly.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor ColumnStat to be more flexible.
* Split `ColumnStat` and `CatalogColumnStat` just like `CatalogStatistics` is split from `Statistics`. This detaches how the statistics are stored from how they are processed in the query plan. `CatalogColumnStat` keeps `min` and `max` as `String`, making it not depend on dataType information.
* For `CatalogColumnStat`, parse column names from property names in the metastore (`KEY_VERSION` property), not from metastore schema. This means that `CatalogColumnStat`s can be created for columns even if the schema itself is not stored in the metastore.
* Make all fields optional. `min`, `max` and `histogram` for columns were optional already. Having them all optional is more consistent, and gives flexibility to e.g. drop some of the fields through transformations if they are difficult / impossible to calculate.
The added flexibility will make it possible to have alternative implementations for stats, and separates stats collection from stats and estimation processing in plans.
## How was this patch tested?
Refactored existing tests to work with refactored `ColumnStat` and `CatalogColumnStat`.
New tests added in `StatisticsSuite` checking that backwards / forwards compatibility is not broken.
Author: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>
Closes#20624 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-23445.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR always adds `codegenStageId` in comment of the generated class. This is a replication of #20419 for post-Spark 2.3.
Closes#20419
```
/* 001 */ public Object generate(Object[] references) {
/* 002 */ return new GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1(references);
/* 003 */ }
/* 004 */
/* 005 */ // codegenStageId=1
/* 006 */ final class GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1 extends org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator {
/* 007 */ private Object[] references;
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20612 from kiszk/SPARK-23424.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Apache Spark 2.3 introduced `native` ORC supports with vectorization and many fixes. However, it's shipped as a not-default option. This PR enables `native` ORC implementation and predicate-pushdown by default for Apache Spark 2.4. We will improve and stabilize ORC data source before Apache Spark 2.4. And, eventually, Apache Spark will drop old Hive-based ORC code.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with existing tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#20634 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-23456.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Cleaned up the codegen templates for `Literal`s, to make sure that the `ExprCode` returned from `Literal.doGenCode()` has:
1. an empty `code` field;
2. an `isNull` field of either literal `true` or `false`;
3. a `value` field that is just a simple literal/constant.
Before this PR, there are a couple of paths that would return a non-trivial `code` and all of them are actually unnecessary. The `NaN` and `Infinity` constants for `double` and `float` can be accessed through constants directly available so there's no need to add a reference for them.
Also took the opportunity to add a new util method for ease of creating `ExprCode` for inline-able non-null values.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Closes#20626 from rednaxelafx/codegen-literal.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Migrating KafkaSource (with data source v1) to KafkaMicroBatchReader (with data source v2).
Performance comparison:
In a unit test with in-process Kafka broker, I tested the read throughput of V1 and V2 using 20M records in a single partition. They were comparable.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests, few modified to be better tests than the existing ones.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#20554 from tdas/SPARK-23362.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To prevent any regressions, this PR changes ORC implementation to `hive` by default like Spark 2.2.X.
Users can enable `native` ORC. Also, ORC PPD is also restored to `false` like Spark 2.2.X.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass all test cases.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#20610 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-ORC-DISABLE.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add an alias 'names' of 'fieldNames' in Scala. Please see the discussion in [SPARK-20090](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20090).
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests added in `DataTypeSuite.scala`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#20545 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-23359.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to revert the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20302, because it causes a regression.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20614 from gatorsmile/revertJsonFix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this upcoming 2.3 release, we changed the interface of `ScalaUDF`. Unfortunately, some Spark packages (e.g., spark-deep-learning) are using our internal class `ScalaUDF`. In the release 2.3, we added new parameters into this class. The users hit the binary compatibility issues and got the exception:
```
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ScalaUDF.<init>(Ljava/lang/Object;Lorg/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType;Lscala/collection/Seq;Lscala/collection/Seq;Lscala/Option;)V
```
This PR is to improve the backward compatibility. However, we definitely should not encourage the external packages to use our internal classes. This might make us hard to maintain/develop the codes in Spark.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20591 from gatorsmile/scalaUDF.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added flag ignoreNullability to DataType.equalsStructurally.
The previous semantic is for ignoreNullability=false.
When ignoreNullability=true equalsStructurally ignores nullability of contained types (map key types, value types, array element types, structure field types).
In.checkInputTypes calls equalsStructurally to check if the children types match. They should match regardless of nullability (which is just a hint), so it is now called with ignoreNullability=true.
## How was this patch tested?
New test in SubquerySuite
Author: Bogdan Raducanu <bogdan@databricks.com>
Closes#20548 from bogdanrdc/SPARK-23316.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR targets to explicitly specify supported types in Pandas UDFs.
The main change here is to add a deduplicated and explicit type checking in `returnType` ahead with documenting this; however, it happened to fix multiple things.
1. Currently, we don't support `BinaryType` in Pandas UDFs, for example, see:
```python
from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf
pudf = pandas_udf(lambda x: x, "binary")
df = spark.createDataFrame([[bytearray(1)]])
df.select(pudf("_1")).show()
```
```
...
TypeError: Unsupported type in conversion to Arrow: BinaryType
```
We can document this behaviour for its guide.
2. Also, the grouped aggregate Pandas UDF fails fast on `ArrayType` but seems we can support this case.
```python
from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf, PandasUDFType
foo = pandas_udf(lambda v: v.mean(), 'array<double>', PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG)
df = spark.range(100).selectExpr("id", "array(id) as value")
df.groupBy("id").agg(foo("value")).show()
```
```
...
NotImplementedError: ArrayType, StructType and MapType are not supported with PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG
```
3. Since we can check the return type ahead, we can fail fast before actual execution.
```python
# we can fail fast at this stage because we know the schema ahead
pandas_udf(lambda x: x, BinaryType())
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and unit tests for `BinaryType` and `ArrayType(...)` were added.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#20531 from HyukjinKwon/pudf-cleanup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update the description and tests of three external API or functions `createFunction `, `length` and `repartitionByRange `
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20495 from gatorsmile/updateFunc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the current test case for CombineTypedFilters, we lack the test of FilterFunction, so let's add it.
In addition, in TypedFilterOptimizationSuite's existing test cases, Let's extract a common LocalRelation.
## How was this patch tested?
add new test cases.
Author: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>
Closes#20482 from heary-cao/TypedFilterOptimizationSuite.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23309 reported a performance regression about cached table in Spark 2.3. While the investigating is still going on, this PR adds a conf to turn off the vectorized cache reader, to unblock the 2.3 release.
## How was this patch tested?
a new test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#20483 from cloud-fan/cache.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SpecifiedWindowFrame.defaultWindowFrame(hasOrderSpecification, acceptWindowFrame) was designed to handle the cases when some Window functions don't support setting a window frame (e.g. rank). However this param is never used.
We may inline the whole of this function to simplify the code.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Closes#20463 from jiangxb1987/defaultWindowFrame.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR include the following changes:
- Make the capacity of `VectorizedParquetRecordReader` configurable;
- Make the capacity of `OrcColumnarBatchReader` configurable;
- Update the error message when required capacity in writable columnar vector cannot be fulfilled.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Closes#20361 from jiangxb1987/vectorCapacity.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Here is the test snippet.
``` SQL
scala> Seq[(Integer, Integer)](
| (1, 1),
| (1, 3),
| (2, 3),
| (3, 3),
| (4, null),
| (5, null)
| ).toDF("key", "value").createOrReplaceTempView("src")
scala> sql(
| """
| |SELECT MAX(value) as value, key as col2
| |FROM src
| |GROUP BY key
| |ORDER BY value desc, key
| """.stripMargin).show
+-----+----+
|value|col2|
+-----+----+
| 3| 3|
| 3| 2|
| 3| 1|
| null| 5|
| null| 4|
+-----+----+
```SQL
Here is the explain output :
```SQL
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Sort ['value DESC NULLS LAST, 'key ASC NULLS FIRST], true
+- 'Aggregate ['key], ['MAX('value) AS value#9, 'key AS col2#10]
+- 'UnresolvedRelation `src`
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
value: int, col2: int
Project [value#9, col2#10]
+- Sort [value#9 DESC NULLS LAST, col2#10 DESC NULLS LAST], true
+- Aggregate [key#5], [max(value#6) AS value#9, key#5 AS col2#10]
+- SubqueryAlias src
+- Project [_1#2 AS key#5, _2#3 AS value#6]
+- LocalRelation [_1#2, _2#3]
``` SQL
The sort direction is being wrongly changed from ASC to DSC while resolving ```Sort``` in
resolveAggregateFunctions.
The above testcase models TPCDS-Q71 and thus we have the same issue in Q71 as well.
## How was this patch tested?
A few tests are added in SQLQuerySuite.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#20453 from dilipbiswal/local_spark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to fix the `ReplaceExceptWithFilter` rule when the right's Filter contains the references that are not in the left output.
Before this PR, we got the error like
```
java.util.NoSuchElementException: key not found: a
at scala.collection.MapLike$class.default(MapLike.scala:228)
at scala.collection.AbstractMap.default(Map.scala:59)
at scala.collection.MapLike$class.apply(MapLike.scala:141)
at scala.collection.AbstractMap.apply(Map.scala:59)
```
After this PR, `ReplaceExceptWithFilter ` will not take an effect in this case.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20444 from gatorsmile/fixReplaceExceptWithFilter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Still saw the performance regression introduced by `spark.sql.codegen.hugeMethodLimit` in our internal workloads. There are two major issues in the current solution.
- The size of the complied byte code is not identical to the bytecode size of the method. The detection is still not accurate.
- The bytecode size of a single operator (e.g., `SerializeFromObject`) could still exceed 8K limit. We saw the performance regression in such scenario.
Since it is close to the release of 2.3, we decide to increase it to 64K for avoiding the perf regression.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20434 from gatorsmile/revertConf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Rename the public APIs and names of pandas udfs.
- `PANDAS SCALAR UDF` -> `SCALAR PANDAS UDF`
- `PANDAS GROUP MAP UDF` -> `GROUPED MAP PANDAS UDF`
- `PANDAS GROUP AGG UDF` -> `GROUPED AGG PANDAS UDF`
## How was this patch tested?
The existing tests
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20428 from gatorsmile/renamePandasUDFs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup to #19575 which added a section on setting max Arrow record batches and this will externalize the conf that was referenced in the docs.
## How was this patch tested?
NA
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#20423 from BryanCutler/arrow-user-doc-externalize-maxRecordsPerBatch-SPARK-22221.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is a common pattern to apply multiple transforms to a `Dataset` (using `Dataset.withColumn` for example. This is currently quite expensive because we run `CheckAnalysis` on the full plan and create an encoder for each intermediate `Dataset`.
This PR extends the usage of the `AnalysisBarrier` to include `CheckAnalysis`. By doing this we hide the already analyzed plan from `CheckAnalysis` because barrier is a `LeafNode`. The `AnalysisBarrier` is in the `FinishAnalysis` phase of the optimizer.
We also make binding the `Dataset` encoder lazy. The bound encoder is only needed when we materialize the dataset.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test should cover this.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#20402 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23223.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, all Aggregate operations will go into RemoveRepetitionFromGroupExpressions, but there is no group expression or there is no duplicate group expression in group expression, we not need copy for logic plan.
## How was this patch tested?
the existed test case.
Author: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>
Closes#20375 from heary-cao/RepetitionGroupExpressions.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we have `ReadTask` in data source v2 reader, while in writer we have `DataWriterFactory`.
To make the naming consistent and better, renaming `ReadTask` to `DataReaderFactory`.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>
Closes#20397 from gengliangwang/rename.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to expose few internal configurations found in the documentation.
Also it fixes the description for `spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled`.
It's quite self-explanatory.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#20403 from HyukjinKwon/minor-doc-arrow.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace streaming V2 sinks with a unified StreamWriteSupport interface, with a shim to use it with microbatch execution.
Add a new SQL config to use for disabling V2 sinks, falling back to the V1 sink implementation.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests, which in the case of Kafka (the only existing continuous V2 sink) now use V2 for microbatch.
Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>
Closes#20369 from jose-torres/streaming-sink.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently shuffle repartition uses RoundRobinPartitioning, the generated result is nondeterministic since the sequence of input rows are not determined.
The bug can be triggered when there is a repartition call following a shuffle (which would lead to non-deterministic row ordering), as the pattern shows below:
upstream stage -> repartition stage -> result stage
(-> indicate a shuffle)
When one of the executors process goes down, some tasks on the repartition stage will be retried and generate inconsistent ordering, and some tasks of the result stage will be retried generating different data.
The following code returns 931532, instead of 1000000:
```
import scala.sys.process._
import org.apache.spark.TaskContext
val res = spark.range(0, 1000 * 1000, 1).repartition(200).map { x =>
x
}.repartition(200).map { x =>
if (TaskContext.get.attemptNumber == 0 && TaskContext.get.partitionId < 2) {
throw new Exception("pkill -f java".!!)
}
x
}
res.distinct().count()
```
In this PR, we propose a most straight-forward way to fix this problem by performing a local sort before partitioning, after we make the input row ordering deterministic, the function from rows to partitions is fully deterministic too.
The downside of the approach is that with extra local sort inserted, the performance of repartition() will go down, so we add a new config named `spark.sql.execution.sortBeforeRepartition` to control whether this patch is applied. The patch is default enabled to be safe-by-default, but user may choose to manually turn it off to avoid performance regression.
This patch also changes the output rows ordering of repartition(), that leads to a bunch of test cases failure because they are comparing the results directly.
## How was this patch tested?
Add unit test in ExchangeSuite.
With this patch(and `spark.sql.execution.sortBeforeRepartition` set to true), the following query returns 1000000:
```
import scala.sys.process._
import org.apache.spark.TaskContext
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.sortBeforeRepartition", "true")
val res = spark.range(0, 1000 * 1000, 1).repartition(200).map { x =>
x
}.repartition(200).map { x =>
if (TaskContext.get.attemptNumber == 0 && TaskContext.get.partitionId < 2) {
throw new Exception("pkill -f java".!!)
}
x
}
res.distinct().count()
res7: Long = 1000000
```
Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Closes#20393 from jiangxb1987/shuffle-repartition.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**Proposal**
Add a per-query ID to the codegen stages as represented by `WholeStageCodegenExec` operators. This ID will be used in
- the explain output of the physical plan, and in
- the generated class name.
Specifically, this ID will be stable within a query, counting up from 1 in depth-first post-order for all the `WholeStageCodegenExec` inserted into a plan.
The ID value 0 is reserved for "free-floating" `WholeStageCodegenExec` objects, which may have been created for one-off purposes, e.g. for fallback handling of codegen stages that failed to codegen the whole stage and wishes to codegen a subset of the children operators (as seen in `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec#doExecute`).
Example: for the following query:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold", 1)
scala> val df1 = spark.range(10).select('id as 'x, 'id + 1 as 'y).orderBy('x).select('x + 1 as 'z, 'y)
df1: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [z: bigint, y: bigint]
scala> val df2 = spark.range(5)
df2: org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[Long] = [id: bigint]
scala> val query = df1.join(df2, 'z === 'id)
query: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [z: bigint, y: bigint ... 1 more field]
```
The explain output before the change is:
```scala
scala> query.explain
== Physical Plan ==
*SortMergeJoin [z#9L], [id#13L], Inner
:- *Sort [z#9L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: +- Exchange hashpartitioning(z#9L, 200)
: +- *Project [(x#3L + 1) AS z#9L, y#4L]
: +- *Sort [x#3L ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
: +- Exchange rangepartitioning(x#3L ASC NULLS FIRST, 200)
: +- *Project [id#0L AS x#3L, (id#0L + 1) AS y#4L]
: +- *Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=8)
+- *Sort [id#13L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#13L, 200)
+- *Range (0, 5, step=1, splits=8)
```
Note how codegen'd operators are annotated with a prefix `"*"`. See how the `SortMergeJoin` operator and its direct children `Sort` operators are adjacent and all annotated with the `"*"`, so it's hard to tell they're actually in separate codegen stages.
and after this change it'll be:
```scala
scala> query.explain
== Physical Plan ==
*(6) SortMergeJoin [z#9L], [id#13L], Inner
:- *(3) Sort [z#9L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: +- Exchange hashpartitioning(z#9L, 200)
: +- *(2) Project [(x#3L + 1) AS z#9L, y#4L]
: +- *(2) Sort [x#3L ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0
: +- Exchange rangepartitioning(x#3L ASC NULLS FIRST, 200)
: +- *(1) Project [id#0L AS x#3L, (id#0L + 1) AS y#4L]
: +- *(1) Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=8)
+- *(5) Sort [id#13L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#13L, 200)
+- *(4) Range (0, 5, step=1, splits=8)
```
Note that the annotated prefix becomes `"*(id) "`. See how the `SortMergeJoin` operator and its direct children `Sort` operators have different codegen stage IDs.
It'll also show up in the name of the generated class, as a suffix in the format of `GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator$id`.
For example, note how `GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage3` and `GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6` in the following stack trace corresponds to the IDs shown in the explain output above:
```
"Executor task launch worker for task 42412957" daemon prio=5 tid=0x58 nid=NA runnable
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeExternalRowSorter.insertRow(UnsafeExternalRowSorter.java:109)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage3.sort_addToSorter$(generated.java:32)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage3.processNext(generated.java:41)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$9$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:494)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6.findNextInnerJoinRows$(generated.java:42)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6.processNext(generated.java:101)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$11$$anon$2.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:513)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$2.apply(SparkPlan.scala:253)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$2.apply(SparkPlan.scala:247)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$25.apply(RDD.scala:828)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$25.apply(RDD.scala:828)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:324)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:109)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:345)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```
**Rationale**
Right now, the codegen from Spark SQL lacks the means to differentiate between a couple of things:
1. It's hard to tell which physical operators are in the same WholeStageCodegen stage. Note that this "stage" is a separate notion from Spark's RDD execution stages; this one is only to delineate codegen units.
There can be adjacent physical operators that are both codegen'd but are in separate codegen stages. Some of this is due to hacky implementation details, such as the case with `SortMergeJoin` and its `Sort` inputs -- they're hard coded to be split into separate stages although both are codegen'd.
When printing out the explain output of the physical plan, you'd only see the codegen'd physical operators annotated with a preceding star (`'*'`) but would have no way to figure out if they're in the same stage.
2. Performance/error diagnosis
The generated code has class/method names that are hard to differentiate between queries or even between codegen stages within the same query. If we use a Java-level profiler to collect profiles, or if we encounter a Java-level exception with a stack trace in it, it's really hard to tell which part of a query it's at.
By introducing a per-query codegen stage ID, we'd at least be able to know which codegen stage (and in turn, which group of physical operators) was a profile tick or an exception happened.
The reason why this proposal uses a per-query ID is because it's stable within a query, so that multiple runs of the same query will see the same resulting IDs. This both benefits understandability for users, and also it plays well with the codegen cache in Spark SQL which uses the generated source code as the key.
The downside to using per-query IDs as opposed to a per-session or globally incrementing ID is of course we can't tell apart different query runs with this ID alone. But for now I believe this is a good enough tradeoff.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests. This PR does not involve any runtime behavior changes other than some name changes.
The SQL query test suites that compares explain outputs have been updates to ignore the newly added `codegenStageId`.
Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Closes#20224 from rednaxelafx/wsc-codegenstageid.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It has been observed in SPARK-21603 that whole-stage codegen suffers performance degradation, if the generated functions are too long to be optimized by JIT.
We basically produce a single function to incorporate generated codes from all physical operators in whole-stage. Thus, it is possibly to grow the size of generated function over a threshold that we can't have JIT optimization for it anymore.
This patch is trying to decouple the logic of consuming rows in physical operators to avoid a giant function processing rows.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#18931 from viirya/SPARK-21717.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `GenArrayData.genCodeToCreateArrayData` produces illegal java code when code splitting is enabled. This is used in `CreateArray` and `CreateMap` expressions for complex object arrays.
This issue is caused by a typo.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a regression test in `complexTypesSuite`.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#20391 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23208.
