All the physical types are properly tested at `ParquetIOSuite` but logical type mapping is not being tested.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Author: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#9660 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-11694.
Also introduces new spark private API in RDD.scala with name 'mapPartitionsInternal' which doesn't closure cleans the RDD elements.
Author: nitin goyal <nitin.goyal@guavus.com>
Author: nitin.goyal <nitin.goyal@guavus.com>
Closes#9253 from nitin2goyal/master.
also add more tests for encoders, and fix bugs that I found:
* when convert array to catalyst array, we can only skip element conversion for native types(e.g. int, long, boolean), not `AtomicType`(String is AtomicType but we need to convert it)
* we should also handle scala `BigDecimal` when convert from catalyst `Decimal`.
* complex map type should be supported
other issues that still in investigation:
* encode java `BigDecimal` and decode it back, seems we will loss precision info.
* when encode case class that defined inside a object, `ClassNotFound` exception will be thrown.
I'll remove unused code in a follow-up PR.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#9693 from cloud-fan/split.
* rename `AppendColumn` to `AppendColumns` to be consistent with the physical plan name.
* clean up stale comments.
* always pass in resolved encoder to `TypedColumn.withInputType`(test added)
* enable a mistakenly disabled java test.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#9688 from cloud-fan/follow.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11678
The change of this PR is to pass root paths of table to the partition discovery logic. So, the process of partition discovery stops at those root paths instead of going all the way to the root path of the file system.
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#9651 from yhuai/SPARK-11678.
This PR adds a new method, `reduce`, to `GroupedDataset`, which allows similar operations to `reduceByKey` on a traditional `PairRDD`.
```scala
val ds = Seq("abc", "xyz", "hello").toDS()
ds.groupBy(_.length).reduce(_ + _).collect() // not actually commutative :P
res0: Array(3 -> "abcxyz", 5 -> "hello")
```
While implementing this method and its test cases several more deficiencies were found in our encoder handling. Specifically, in order to support positional resolution, named resolution and tuple composition, it is important to keep the unresolved encoder around and to use it when constructing new `Datasets` with the same object type but different output attributes. We now divide the encoder lifecycle into three phases (that mirror the lifecycle of standard expressions) and have checks at various boundaries:
- Unresoved Encoders: all users facing encoders (those constructed by implicits, static methods, or tuple composition) are unresolved, meaning they have only `UnresolvedAttributes` for named fields and `BoundReferences` for fields accessed by ordinal.
- Resolved Encoders: internal to a `[Grouped]Dataset` the encoder is resolved, meaning all input has been resolved to a specific `AttributeReference`. Any encoders that are placed into a logical plan for use in object construction should be resolved.
- BoundEncoder: Are constructed by physical plans, right before actual conversion from row -> object is performed.
It is left to future work to add explicit checks for resolution and provide good error messages when it fails. We might also consider enforcing the above constraints in the type system (i.e. `fromRow` only exists on a `ResolvedEncoder`), but we should probably wait before spending too much time on this.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#9673 from marmbrus/pr/9628.
switched stddev support from DeclarativeAggregate to ImperativeAggregate.
Author: JihongMa <linlin200605@gmail.com>
Closes#9380 from JihongMA/SPARK-11420.
Parquet supports some unsigned datatypes. However, Since Spark does not support unsigned datatypes, it needs to emit an exception with a clear message rather then with the one saying illegal datatype.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#9646 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-10113.
`to_unix_timestamp` is the deterministic version of `unix_timestamp`, as it accepts at least one parameters.
Since the behavior here is quite similar to `unix_timestamp`, I think the dataframe API is not necessary here.
Author: Daoyuan Wang <daoyuan.wang@intel.com>
Closes#9347 from adrian-wang/to_unix_timestamp.
This adds a pivot method to the dataframe api.
Following the lead of cube and rollup this adds a Pivot operator that is translated into an Aggregate by the analyzer.
Currently the syntax is like:
~~courseSales.pivot(Seq($"year"), $"course", Seq("dotNET", "Java"), sum($"earnings"))~~
~~Would we be interested in the following syntax also/alternatively? and~~
courseSales.groupBy($"year").pivot($"course", "dotNET", "Java").agg(sum($"earnings"))
//or
courseSales.groupBy($"year").pivot($"course").agg(sum($"earnings"))
Later we can add it to `SQLParser`, but as Hive doesn't support it we cant add it there, right?
~~Also what would be the suggested Java friendly method signature for this?~~
Author: Andrew Ray <ray.andrew@gmail.com>
Closes#7841 from aray/sql-pivot.
This patch modifies Spark's closure cleaner (and a few other places) to use ASM 5, which is necessary in order to support cleaning of closures that were compiled by Java 8.
In order to avoid ASM dependency conflicts, Spark excludes ASM from all of its dependencies and uses a shaded version of ASM 4 that comes from `reflectasm` (see [SPARK-782](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-782) and #232). This patch updates Spark to use a shaded version of ASM 5.0.4 that was published by the Apache XBean project; the POM used to create the shaded artifact can be found at https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/blob/xbean-4.4/xbean-asm5-shaded/pom.xml.
http://movingfulcrum.tumblr.com/post/80826553604/asm-framework-50-the-missing-migration-guide was a useful resource while upgrading the code to use the new ASM5 opcodes.
I also added a new regression tests in the `java8-tests` subproject; the existing tests were insufficient to catch this bug, which only affected Scala 2.11 user code which was compiled targeting Java 8.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#9512 from JoshRosen/SPARK-6152.
We need to support custom classes like java beans and combine them into tuple, and it's very hard to do it with the TypeTag-based approach.
We should keep only the compose-based way to create tuple encoder.
This PR also move `Encoder` to `org.apache.spark.sql`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#9567 from cloud-fan/java.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11500
As filed in SPARK-11500, if merging schemas is enabled, the order of files to touch is a matter which might affect the ordering of the output columns.
This was mostly because of the use of `Set` and `Map` so I replaced them to `LinkedHashSet` and `LinkedHashMap` to keep the insertion order.
Also, I changed `reduceOption` to `reduceLeftOption`, and replaced the order of `filesToTouch` from `metadataStatuses ++ commonMetadataStatuses ++ needMerged` to `needMerged ++ metadataStatuses ++ commonMetadataStatuses` in order to touch the part-files first which always have the schema in footers whereas the others might not exist.
One nit is, If merging schemas is not enabled, but when multiple files are given, there is no guarantee of the output order, since there might not be a summary file for the first file, which ends up putting ahead the columns of the other files.
However, I thought this should be okay since disabling merging schemas means (assumes) all the files have the same schemas.
In addition, in the test code for this, I only checked the names of fields.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#9517 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-11500.
See http://search-hadoop.com/m/q3RTtjpe8r1iRbTj2 for discussion.
Summary: addition of VisibleForTesting annotation resulted in spark-shell malfunctioning.
Author: tedyu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
Closes#9585 from tedyu/master.
This patch adds the building blocks for codegening subexpr elimination and implements
it end to end for UnsafeProjection. The building blocks can be used to do the same thing
for other operators.
It introduces some utilities to compute common sub expressions. Expressions can be added to
this data structure. The expr and its children will be recursively matched against existing
expressions (ones previously added) and grouped into common groups. This is built using
the existing `semanticEquals`. It does not understand things like commutative or associative
expressions. This can be done as future work.
After building this data structure, the codegen process takes advantage of it by:
1. Generating a helper function in the generated class that computes the common
subexpression. This is done for all common subexpressions that have at least
two occurrences and the expression tree is sufficiently complex.
2. When generating the apply() function, if the helper function exists, call that
instead of regenerating the expression tree. Repeated calls to the helper function
shortcircuit the evaluation logic.
Author: Nong Li <nong@databricks.com>
Author: Nong Li <nongli@gmail.com>
This patch had conflicts when merged, resolved by
Committer: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#9480 from nongli/spark-10371.
Currently the user facing api for typed aggregation has some limitations:
* the customized typed aggregation must be the first of aggregation list
* the customized typed aggregation can only use long as buffer type
* the customized typed aggregation can only use flat type as result type
This PR tries to remove these limitations.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#9599 from cloud-fan/agg.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9830
This PR contains the following main changes.
* Removing `AggregateExpression1`.
* Removing `Aggregate` operator, which is used to evaluate `AggregateExpression1`.
* Removing planner rule used to plan `Aggregate`.
* Linking `MultipleDistinctRewriter` to analyzer.
* Renaming `AggregateExpression2` to `AggregateExpression` and `AggregateFunction2` to `AggregateFunction`.
* Updating places where we create aggregate expression. The way to create aggregate expressions is `AggregateExpression(aggregateFunction, mode, isDistinct)`.
* Changing `val`s in `DeclarativeAggregate`s that touch children of this function to `lazy val`s (when we create aggregate expression in DataFrame API, children of an aggregate function can be unresolved).
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#9556 from yhuai/removeAgg1.
This PR adds a new interface for user-defined aggregations, that can be used in `DataFrame` and `Dataset` operations to take all of the elements of a group and reduce them to a single value.
For example, the following aggregator extracts an `int` from a specific class and adds them up:
```scala
case class Data(i: Int)
val customSummer = new Aggregator[Data, Int, Int] {
def prepare(d: Data) = d.i
def reduce(l: Int, r: Int) = l + r
def present(r: Int) = r
}.toColumn()
val ds: Dataset[Data] = ...
val aggregated = ds.select(customSummer)
```
By using helper functions, users can make a generic `Aggregator` that works on any input type:
```scala
/** An `Aggregator` that adds up any numeric type returned by the given function. */
class SumOf[I, N : Numeric](f: I => N) extends Aggregator[I, N, N] with Serializable {
val numeric = implicitly[Numeric[N]]
override def zero: N = numeric.zero
override def reduce(b: N, a: I): N = numeric.plus(b, f(a))
override def present(reduction: N): N = reduction
}
def sum[I, N : Numeric : Encoder](f: I => N): TypedColumn[I, N] = new SumOf(f).toColumn
```
These aggregators can then be used alongside other built-in SQL aggregations.
```scala
val ds = Seq(("a", 10), ("a", 20), ("b", 1), ("b", 2), ("c", 1)).toDS()
ds
.groupBy(_._1)
.agg(
sum(_._2), // The aggregator defined above.
expr("sum(_2)").as[Int], // A built-in dynatically typed aggregation.
count("*")) // A built-in statically typed aggregation.
.collect()
res0: ("a", 30, 30, 2L), ("b", 3, 3, 2L), ("c", 1, 1, 1L)
```
The current implementation focuses on integrating this into the typed API, but currently only supports running aggregations that return a single long value as explained in `TypedAggregateExpression`. This will be improved in a followup PR.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#9555 from marmbrus/dataset-useragg.
Actually this was resolved by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8275.
But I found the JIRA issue for this is not marked as resolved since the PR above was made for another issue but the PR above resolved both.
I commented that this is resolved by the PR above; however, I opened this PR as I would like to just add
a little bit of corrections.
In the previous PR, I refactored the test by not reducing just collecting filters; however, this would not test properly `And` filter (which is not given to the tests). I unintentionally changed this from the original way (before being refactored).
In this PR, I just followed the original way to collect filters by reducing.
I would like to close this if this PR is inappropriate and somebody would like this deal with it in the separate PR related with this.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#9554 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-9557.
For now they are thin wrappers around the corresponding Hive UDAFs.
One limitation with these in Hive 0.13.0 is they only support aggregating primitive types.
I chose snake_case here instead of camelCase because it seems to be used in the majority of the multi-word fns.
Do we also want to add these to `functions.py`?
This approach was recommended here: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8592#issuecomment-154247089
marmbrus rxin
Author: Nick Buroojy <nick.buroojy@civitaslearning.com>
Closes#9526 from nburoojy/nick/udaf-alias.
(cherry picked from commit a6ee4f989d)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
The reason is that:
1. For partitioned hive table, we will move the partitioned columns after data columns. (e.g. `<a: Int, b: Int>` partition by `a` will become `<b: Int, a: Int>`)
2. When append data to table, we use position to figure out how to match input columns to table's columns.
So when we append data to partitioned table, we will match wrong columns between input and table. A solution is reordering the input columns before match by position, like what we did for [`InsertIntoHadoopFsRelation`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InsertIntoHadoopFsRelation.scala#L101-L105)
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#9408 from cloud-fan/append.
A few changes:
1. Removed fold, since it can be confusing for distributed collections.
2. Created specific interfaces for each Dataset function (e.g. MapFunction, ReduceFunction, MapPartitionsFunction)
3. Added more documentation and test cases.
The other thing I'm considering doing is to have a "collector" interface for FlatMapFunction and MapPartitionsFunction, similar to MapReduce's map function.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#9531 from rxin/SPARK-11564.
This PR adds support for multiple column in a single count distinct aggregate to the new aggregation path.
cc yhuai
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#9409 from hvanhovell/SPARK-11451.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11362
We use scala.collection.mutable.BitSet in BroadcastNestedLoopJoin now. We should use Spark's BitSet.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@appier.com>
Closes#9316 from viirya/use-spark-bitset.
The second PR for SPARK-9241, this adds support for multiple distinct columns to the new aggregation code path.
This PR solves the multiple DISTINCT column problem by rewriting these Aggregates into an Expand-Aggregate-Aggregate combination. See the [JIRA ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9241) for some information on this. The advantages over the - competing - [first PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9280) are:
- This can use the faster TungstenAggregate code path.
- It is impossible to OOM due to an ```OpenHashSet``` allocating to much memory. However, this will multiply the number of input rows by the number of distinct clauses (plus one), and puts a lot more memory pressure on the aggregation code path itself.
The location of this Rule is a bit funny, and should probably change when the old aggregation path is changed.
cc yhuai - Could you also tell me where to add tests for this?
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#9406 from hvanhovell/SPARK-9241-rewriter.
This PR enables the Expand operator to process and produce Unsafe Rows.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#9414 from hvanhovell/SPARK-11450.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10116
This is really trivial, just happened to notice it -- if `XORShiftRandom.hashSeed` is really supposed to have random bits throughout (as the comment implies), it needs to do something for the conversion to `long`.
mengxr mkolod
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes#8314 from squito/SPARK-10116.
This PR adds test cases that test various column pruning and filter push-down cases.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#9468 from liancheng/spark-10978.follow-up.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9162
Currently ScalaUDF extends CodegenFallback and doesn't provide code generation implementation. This path implements code generation for ScalaUDF.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@appier.com>
Closes#9270 from viirya/scalaudf-codegen.
This PR adds the ability to do typed SQL aggregations. We will likely also want to provide an interface to allow users to do aggregations on objects, but this is deferred to another PR.
```scala
val ds = Seq(("a", 10), ("a", 20), ("b", 1), ("b", 2), ("c", 1)).toDS()
ds.groupBy(_._1).agg(sum("_2").as[Int]).collect()
res0: Array(("a", 30), ("b", 3), ("c", 1))
```
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#9499 from marmbrus/dataset-agg.
