Commit graph

24 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
HyukjinKwon 4ad9bfd53b [SPARK-32138] Drop Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to drop Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5.

Roughly speaking, it removes all the widely known Python 2 compatibility workarounds such as `sys.version` comparison, `__future__`. Also, it removes the Python 2 dedicated codes such as `ArrayConstructor` in Spark.

### Why are the changes needed?

 1. Unsupport EOL Python versions
 2. Reduce maintenance overhead and remove a bit of legacy codes and hacks for Python 2.
 3. PyPy2 has a critical bug that causes a flaky test, SPARK-28358 given my testing and investigation.
 4. Users can use Python type hints with Pandas UDFs without thinking about Python version
 5. Users can leverage one latest cloudpickle, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28950. With Python 3.8+ it can also leverage C pickle.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes, users cannot use Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 in the upcoming Spark version.

### How was this patch tested?

Manually tested and also tested in Jenkins.

Closes #28957 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-32138.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2020-07-14 11:22:44 +09:00
HyukjinKwon fe75ff8bea [SPARK-28206][PYTHON] Remove the legacy Epydoc in PySpark API documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Seems like we used to generate PySpark API documentation by Epydoc almost at the very first place (see 85b8f2c64f).

This fixes an actual issue:

Before:

![Screen Shot 2019-07-05 at 8 20 01 PM](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6477701/60720491-e9879180-9f65-11e9-9562-100830a456cd.png)

After:

![Screen Shot 2019-07-05 at 8 20 05 PM](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6477701/60720495-ec828200-9f65-11e9-8277-8f689e292cb0.png)

It seems apparently a bug within `epytext` plugin during the conversion between`param` and `:param` syntax. See also [Epydoc syntax](http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/manual-epytext.html).

Actually, Epydoc syntax violates [PEP-257](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0257/) IIRC and blocks us to enable some rules for doctest linter as well.

We should remove this legacy away and I guess Spark 3 is good timing to do it.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually built the doc and check each.

I had to manually find the Epydoc syntax by `git grep -r "{L"`, for instance.

Closes #25060 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-28206.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
2019-07-05 10:08:22 -07:00
Giovanni Lanzani 92530c7db1 [SPARK-9792] Make DenseMatrix equality semantical
Before, you could have this code

```
A = SparseMatrix(2, 2, [0, 2, 3], [0], [2])
B = DenseMatrix(2, 2, [2, 0, 0, 0])

B == A  # False
A == B  # True
```

The second would be `True` as `SparseMatrix` already checks for semantic
equality. This commit changes `DenseMatrix` so that equality is
semantical as well.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Better semantic equality for DenseMatrix

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests were added, plus manual testing. Note that the code falls back to the old behavior when `other` is not a SparseMatrix.

Closes #17968 from gglanzani/SPARK-9792.

Authored-by: Giovanni Lanzani <giovanni@lanzani.nl>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
2019-04-01 09:30:33 -07:00
Sean Owen 0b3abef195 [SPARK-26638][PYSPARK][ML] Pyspark vector classes always return error for unary negation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fix implementation of unary negation (`__neg__`) in Pyspark DenseVectors

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests, plus new doctest

Closes #23570 from srowen/SPARK-26638.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
2019-01-17 14:24:21 -06:00
hyukjinkwon 044b33b2ed [SPARK-24740][PYTHON][ML] Make PySpark's tests compatible with NumPy 1.14+
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to make PySpark's tests compatible with NumPy 0.14+
NumPy 0.14.x introduced rather radical changes about its string representation.

For example, the tests below are failed:

```
**********************************************************************
File "/.../spark/python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py", line 895, in __main__.DenseMatrix.__str__
Failed example:
    print(dm)
Expected:
    DenseMatrix([[ 0.,  2.],
                 [ 1.,  3.]])
Got:
    DenseMatrix([[0., 2.],
                 [1., 3.]])
**********************************************************************
File "/.../spark/python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py", line 899, in __main__.DenseMatrix.__str__
Failed example:
    print(dm)
Expected:
    DenseMatrix([[ 0.,  1.],
                 [ 2.,  3.]])
Got:
    DenseMatrix([[0., 1.],
                 [2., 3.]])
**********************************************************************
File "/.../spark/python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py", line 939, in __main__.DenseMatrix.toArray
Failed example:
    m.toArray()
Expected:
    array([[ 0.,  2.],
           [ 1.,  3.]])
Got:
    array([[0., 2.],
           [1., 3.]])
**********************************************************************
File "/.../spark/python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py", line 324, in __main__.DenseVector.dot
Failed example:
    dense.dot(np.reshape([1., 2., 3., 4.], (2, 2), order='F'))
Expected:
    array([  5.,  11.])
Got:
    array([ 5., 11.])
**********************************************************************
File "/.../spark/python/pyspark/ml/linalg/__init__.py", line 567, in __main__.SparseVector.dot
Failed example:
    a.dot(np.array([[1, 1], [2, 2], [3, 3], [4, 4]]))
Expected:
    array([ 22.,  22.])
Got:
    array([22., 22.])
```

See [release note](https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.14.0/release.html#compatibility-notes).

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested:

```
$ ./run-tests --python-executables=python3.6,python2.7 --modules=pyspark-ml,pyspark-mllib
Running PySpark tests. Output is in /.../spark/python/unit-tests.log
Will test against the following Python executables: ['python3.6', 'python2.7']
Will test the following Python modules: ['pyspark-ml', 'pyspark-mllib']
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.tests
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.classification
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.tests
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.clustering
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.clustering (54s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.evaluation
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.classification (74s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.feature
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.evaluation (27s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.fpm
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.fpm (0s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.image
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.image (17s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.linalg.__init__
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.linalg.__init__ (1s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.recommendation
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.feature (76s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.regression
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.recommendation (69s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.stat
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.regression (45s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.tests
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.stat (28s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.tuning
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.tuning (20s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.classification
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.classification (31s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.clustering
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.tests (260s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.evaluation
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.tests (266s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.feature
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.evaluation (21s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.fpm
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.feature (38s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.linalg.__init__
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.linalg.__init__ (1s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.linalg.distributed
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.fpm (34s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.random
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.clustering (64s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.recommendation
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.random (15s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.regression
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.linalg.distributed (47s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.stat.KernelDensity
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.stat.KernelDensity (0s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.stat._statistics
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.recommendation (40s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.tree
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.regression (38s)
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.util
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.stat._statistics (19s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.classification
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.tree (26s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.clustering
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.mllib.util (27s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.evaluation
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.evaluation (30s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.feature
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.ml.tests (234s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.fpm
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.fpm (1s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.image
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.clustering (55s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.linalg.__init__
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.linalg.__init__ (0s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.recommendation
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.classification (71s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.regression
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.image (18s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.stat
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.stat (37s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.tests
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.regression (59s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.tuning
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.feature (93s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.classification
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.recommendation (83s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.clustering
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.tuning (29s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.evaluation
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.evaluation (26s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.feature
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.classification (43s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.fpm
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.clustering (81s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.linalg.__init__
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.linalg.__init__ (2s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.linalg.distributed
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.fpm (48s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.random
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.feature (54s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.recommendation
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.random (18s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.regression
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.linalg.distributed (55s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.stat.KernelDensity
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.stat.KernelDensity (1s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.stat._statistics
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.recommendation (51s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.tree
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.regression (45s)
Starting test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.util
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.stat._statistics (21s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.tree (27s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.mllib.util (27s)
Finished test(python3.6): pyspark.ml.tests (264s)
```

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>

Closes #21715 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-24740.
2018-07-07 11:39:29 +08:00
Benjamin Peterson 7013eea11c [SPARK-23522][PYTHON] always use sys.exit over builtin exit
The exit() builtin is only for interactive use. applications should use sys.exit().

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

All usage of the builtin `exit()` function is replaced by `sys.exit()`.

## How was this patch tested?

I ran `python/run-tests`.

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>

Closes #20682 from benjaminp/sys-exit.
2018-03-08 20:38:34 +09:00
Liang-Chi Hsieh 12206058e8 [SPARK-20214][ML] Make sure converted csc matrix has sorted indices
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`_convert_to_vector` converts a scipy sparse matrix to csc matrix for initializing `SparseVector`. However, it doesn't guarantee the converted csc matrix has sorted indices and so a failure happens when you do something like that:

    from scipy.sparse import lil_matrix
    lil = lil_matrix((4, 1))
    lil[1, 0] = 1
    lil[3, 0] = 2
    _convert_to_vector(lil.todok())

    File "/home/jenkins/workspace/python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py", line 78, in _convert_to_vector
      return SparseVector(l.shape[0], csc.indices, csc.data)
    File "/home/jenkins/workspace/python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py", line 556, in __init__
      % (self.indices[i], self.indices[i + 1]))
    TypeError: Indices 3 and 1 are not strictly increasing

A simple test can confirm that `dok_matrix.tocsc()` won't guarantee sorted indices:

    >>> from scipy.sparse import lil_matrix
    >>> lil = lil_matrix((4, 1))
    >>> lil[1, 0] = 1
    >>> lil[3, 0] = 2
    >>> dok = lil.todok()
    >>> csc = dok.tocsc()
    >>> csc.has_sorted_indices
    0
    >>> csc.indices
    array([3, 1], dtype=int32)

I checked the source codes of scipy. The only way to guarantee it is `csc_matrix.tocsr()` and `csr_matrix.tocsc()`.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>

Closes #17532 from viirya/make-sure-sorted-indices.
2017-04-05 17:46:44 -07:00
hyukjinkwon 933a6548d4
[SPARK-18447][DOCS] Fix the markdown for Note:/NOTE:/Note that across Python API documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It seems in Python, there are

- `Note:`
- `NOTE:`
- `Note that`
- `.. note::`

This PR proposes to fix those to `.. note::` to be consistent.

**Before**

<img width="567" alt="2016-11-21 1 18 49" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6477701/20464305/85144c86-af88-11e6-8ee9-90f584dd856c.png">

<img width="617" alt="2016-11-21 12 42 43" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6477701/20464263/27be5022-af88-11e6-8577-4bbca7cdf36c.png">

**After**

<img width="554" alt="2016-11-21 1 18 42" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6477701/20464306/8fe48932-af88-11e6-83e1-fc3cbf74407d.png">

<img width="628" alt="2016-11-21 12 42 51" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6477701/20464264/2d3e156e-af88-11e6-93f3-cab8d8d02983.png">

## How was this patch tested?

The notes were found via

```bash
grep -r "Note: " .
grep -r "NOTE: " .
grep -r "Note that " .
```

And then fixed one by one comparing with API documentation.

After that, manually tested via `make html` under `./python/docs`.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #15947 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-18447.
2016-11-22 11:40:18 +00:00
zero323 d8399b600c [SPARK-17587][PYTHON][MLLIB] SparseVector __getitem__ should follow __getitem__ contract
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Replaces` ValueError` with `IndexError` when index passed to `ml` / `mllib` `SparseVector.__getitem__` is out of range. This ensures correct iteration behavior.

Replaces `ValueError` with `IndexError` for `DenseMatrix` and `SparkMatrix` in `ml` / `mllib`.

## How was this patch tested?

PySpark `ml` / `mllib` unit tests. Additional unit tests to prove that the problem has been resolved.

Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>

Closes #15144 from zero323/SPARK-17587.
2016-10-03 17:57:54 -07:00
Joseph K. Bradley 01f09b1612 [SPARK-14812][ML][MLLIB][PYTHON] Experimental, DeveloperApi annotation audit for ML
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

General decisions to follow, except where noted:
* spark.mllib, pyspark.mllib: Remove all Experimental annotations.  Leave DeveloperApi annotations alone.
* spark.ml, pyspark.ml
** Annotate Estimator-Model pairs of classes and companion objects the same way.
** For all algorithms marked Experimental with Since tag <= 1.6, remove Experimental annotation.
** For all algorithms marked Experimental with Since tag = 2.0, leave Experimental annotation.
* DeveloperApi annotations are left alone, except where noted.
* No changes to which types are sealed.

Exceptions where I am leaving items Experimental in spark.ml, pyspark.ml, mainly because the items are new:
* Model Summary classes
* MLWriter, MLReader, MLWritable, MLReadable
* Evaluator and subclasses: There is discussion of changes around evaluating multiple metrics at once for efficiency.
* RFormula: Its behavior may need to change slightly to match R in edge cases.
* AFTSurvivalRegression
* MultilayerPerceptronClassifier

DeveloperApi changes:
* ml.tree.Node, ml.tree.Split, and subclasses should no longer be DeveloperApi

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Note to reviewers:
* spark.ml.clustering.LDA underwent significant changes (additional methods), so let me know if you want me to leave it Experimental.
* Be careful to check for cases where a class should no longer be Experimental but has an Experimental method, val, or other feature.  I did not find such cases, but please verify.

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>

Closes #14147 from jkbradley/experimental-audit.
2016-07-13 12:33:39 -07:00
Nick Pentreath dab1051613 [SPARK-16328][ML][MLLIB][PYSPARK] Add 'asML' and 'fromML' conversion methods to PySpark linalg
The move to `ml.linalg` created `asML`/`fromML` utility methods in Scala/Java for converting between representations. These are missing in Python, this PR adds them.

## How was this patch tested?

New doctests.

Author: Nick Pentreath <nickp@za.ibm.com>

Closes #13997 from MLnick/SPARK-16328-python-linalg-convert.
2016-06-30 17:52:15 -07:00
andreapasqua 4c64e88d5b [SPARK-16035][PYSPARK] Fix SparseVector parser assertion for end parenthesis
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The check on the end parenthesis of the expression to parse was using the wrong variable. I corrected that.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test

Author: andreapasqua <andrea@radius.com>

Closes #13750 from andreapasqua/sparse-vector-parser-assertion-fix.
2016-06-17 22:41:05 -07:00
Mike Dusenberry 607f50341c [SPARK-9656][MLLIB][PYTHON] Add missing methods to PySpark's Distributed Linear Algebra Classes
This PR adds the remaining group of methods to PySpark's distributed linear algebra classes as follows:

* `RowMatrix` <sup>**[1]**</sup>
  1. `computeGramianMatrix`
  2. `computeCovariance`
  3. `computeColumnSummaryStatistics`
  4. `columnSimilarities`
  5. `tallSkinnyQR` <sup>**[2]**</sup>
* `IndexedRowMatrix` <sup>**[3]**</sup>
  1. `computeGramianMatrix`
* `CoordinateMatrix`
  1. `transpose`
* `BlockMatrix`
  1. `validate`
  2. `cache`
  3. `persist`
  4. `transpose`

**[1]**: Note: `multiply`, `computeSVD`, and `computePrincipalComponents` are already part of PR #7963 for SPARK-6227.
**[2]**: Implementing `tallSkinnyQR` uncovered a bug with our PySpark `RowMatrix` constructor.  As discussed on the dev list [here](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/K-Means-And-Class-Tags-td10038.html), there appears to be an issue with type erasure with RDDs coming from Java, and by extension from PySpark.  Although we are attempting to construct a `RowMatrix` from an `RDD[Vector]` in [PythonMLlibAPI](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala#L1115), the `Vector` type is erased, resulting in an `RDD[Object]`.  Thus, when calling Scala's `tallSkinnyQR` from PySpark, we get a Java `ClassCastException` in which an `Object` cannot be cast to a Spark `Vector`.  As noted in the aforementioned dev list thread, this issue was also encountered with `DecisionTrees`, and the fix involved an explicit `retag` of the RDD with a `Vector` type.  Thus, this PR currently contains that fix applied to the `createRowMatrix` helper function in `PythonMLlibAPI`.  `IndexedRowMatrix` and `CoordinateMatrix` do not appear to have this issue likely due to their related helper functions in `PythonMLlibAPI` creating the RDDs explicitly from DataFrames with pattern matching, thus preserving the types.  However, this fix may be out of scope for this single PR, and it may be better suited in a separate JIRA/PR.  Therefore, I have marked this PR as WIP and am open to discussion.
**[3]**: Note: `multiply` and `computeSVD` are already part of PR #7963 for SPARK-6227.

Author: Mike Dusenberry <mwdusenb@us.ibm.com>

Closes #9441 from dusenberrymw/SPARK-9656_Add_Missing_Methods_to_PySpark_Distributed_Linear_Algebra.
2016-04-27 19:48:05 +02:00
Arash Parsa 2b8906c437 [SPARK-14739][PYSPARK] Fix Vectors parser bugs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PySpark deserialization has a bug that shows while deserializing all zero sparse vectors. This fix filters out empty string tokens before casting, hence properly stringified SparseVectors successfully get parsed.

## How was this patch tested?

Standard unit-tests similar to other methods.

Author: Arash Parsa <arash@ip-192-168-50-106.ec2.internal>
Author: Arash Parsa <arashpa@gmail.com>
Author: Vishnu Prasad <vishnu667@gmail.com>
Author: Vishnu Prasad S <vishnu667@gmail.com>

Closes #12516 from arashpa/SPARK-14739.
2016-04-21 11:29:24 +01:00
Miles Yucht 827ed1c067 Correct SparseVector.parse documentation
There's a small typo in the SparseVector.parse docstring (which says that it returns a DenseVector rather than a SparseVector), which seems to be incorrect.

Author: Miles Yucht <miles@databricks.com>

Closes #11213 from mgyucht/fix-sparsevector-docs.
2016-02-16 13:01:21 +00:00
Joshi 007da1a9dc [SPARK-11531][ML] SparseVector error Msg
PySpark SparseVector should have "Found duplicate indices" error message

Author: Joshi <rekhajoshm@gmail.com>
Author: Rekha Joshi <rekhajoshm@gmail.com>

Closes #9525 from rekhajoshm/SPARK-11531.
2016-01-06 10:48:14 -08:00
zero323 8ac71d62d9 [SPARK-11084] [ML] [PYTHON] Check if index can contain non-zero value before binary search
At this moment `SparseVector.__getitem__` executes `np.searchsorted` first and checks if result is in an expected range after that. It is possible to check if index can contain non-zero value before executing `np.searchsorted`.

Author: zero323 <matthew.szymkiewicz@gmail.com>

Closes #9098 from zero323/sparse_vector_getitem_improved.
2015-10-16 15:53:26 -07:00
Bhargav Mangipudi 1ec0a0dc28 [SPARK-11050] [MLLIB] PySpark SparseVector can return wrong index in e…
…rror message

For negative indices in the SparseVector, we update the index value. If we have an incorrect index
at this point, the error message has the incorrect *updated* index instead of the original one. This
change contains the fix for the same.

Author: Bhargav Mangipudi <bhargav.mangipudi@gmail.com>

Closes #9069 from bhargav/spark-10759.
2015-10-16 14:36:05 -07:00
zero323 8e67882b90 [SPARK-10973] [ML] [PYTHON] __gettitem__ method throws IndexError exception when we…
__gettitem__ method throws IndexError exception when we try to access index after the last non-zero entry

    from pyspark.mllib.linalg import Vectors
    sv = Vectors.sparse(5, {1: 3})
    sv[0]
    ## 0.0
    sv[1]
    ## 3.0
    sv[2]
    ## Traceback (most recent call last):
    ##   File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    ##   File "/python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py", line 734, in __getitem__
    ##     row_ind = inds[insert_index]
    ## IndexError: index out of bounds

Author: zero323 <matthew.szymkiewicz@gmail.com>

Closes #9009 from zero323/sparse_vector_index_error.
2015-10-08 18:34:15 -07:00
noelsmith 7c4f852bfc [DOC] [PYSPARK] [MLLIB] Added newlines to docstrings to fix parameter formatting
Added newlines before `:param ...:` and `:return:` markup. Without these, parameter lists aren't formatted correctly in the API docs. I.e:

![screen shot 2015-09-21 at 21 49 26](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/11915197/10004686/de3c41d4-60aa-11e5-9c50-a46dcb51243f.png)

.. looks like this once newline is added:

![screen shot 2015-09-21 at 21 50 14](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/11915197/10004706/f86bfb08-60aa-11e5-8524-ae4436713502.png)

Author: noelsmith <mail@noelsmith.com>

Closes #8851 from noel-smith/docstring-missing-newline-fix.
2015-09-21 14:24:19 -07:00
vinodkc 0144039517 [SPARK-10631] [DOCUMENTATION, MLLIB, PYSPARK] Added documentation for few APIs
There are some missing API docs in pyspark.mllib.linalg.Vector (including DenseVector and SparseVector). We should add them based on their Scala counterparts.

Author: vinodkc <vinod.kc.in@gmail.com>

Closes #8834 from vinodkc/fix_SPARK-10631.
2015-09-20 22:55:24 -07:00
Vinod K C 95b6a8103f [SPARK-10516] [ MLLIB] Added values property in DenseVector
Author: Vinod K C <vinod.kc@huawei.com>

Closes #8682 from vinodkc/fix_SPARK-10516.
2015-09-15 23:25:51 -07:00
Yanbo Liang 4ae4d54794 [SPARK-9793] [MLLIB] [PYSPARK] PySpark DenseVector, SparseVector implement __eq__ and __hash__ correctly
PySpark DenseVector, SparseVector ```__eq__``` method should use semantics equality, and DenseVector can compared with SparseVector.
Implement PySpark DenseVector, SparseVector ```__hash__``` method based on the first 16 entries. That will make PySpark Vector objects can be used in collections.

Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>

Closes #8166 from yanboliang/spark-9793.
2015-09-14 21:37:43 -07:00
Xiangrui Meng ca71cc8c8b [SPARK-9408] [PYSPARK] [MLLIB] Refactor linalg.py to /linalg
This is based on MechCoder 's PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7731. Hopefully it could pass tests. MechCoder I tried to make minimal changes. If this passes Jenkins, we can merge this one first and then try to move `__init__.py` to `local.py` in a separate PR.

Closes #7731

Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>

Closes #7746 from mengxr/SPARK-9408 and squashes the following commits:

0e05a3b [Xiangrui Meng] merge master
1135551 [Xiangrui Meng] add a comment for str(...)
c48cae0 [Xiangrui Meng] update tests
173a805 [Xiangrui Meng] move linalg.py to linalg/__init__.py
2015-07-30 16:57:38 -07:00
Renamed from python/pyspark/mllib/linalg.py (Browse further)