## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr supported interpreted mode for `NewInstance`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20778 from maropu/SPARK-23584.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `element_at`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
This function returns element of array at given index in value if column is array, or returns value for the given key in value if column is map.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21053 from kiszk/SPARK-23924.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_position`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
The function returns the position of the first occurrence of the element in array x (or 0 if not found) using 1-based index as BigInt.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21037 from kiszk/SPARK-23919.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`EqualNullSafe` for `FloatType` and `DoubleType` might generate a wrong result by codegen.
```scala
scala> val df = Seq((Some(-1.0d), None), (None, Some(-1.0d))).toDF()
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [_1: double, _2: double]
scala> df.show()
+----+----+
| _1| _2|
+----+----+
|-1.0|null|
|null|-1.0|
+----+----+
scala> df.filter("_1 <=> _2").show()
+----+----+
| _1| _2|
+----+----+
|-1.0|null|
|null|-1.0|
+----+----+
```
The result should be empty but the result remains two rows.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21094 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-24007/equalnullsafe.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added `TransitPredicateInOuterJoin` optimization rule that transits constraints from the preserved side of an outer join to the null-supplying side. The constraints of the join operator will remain unchanged.
## How was this patch tested?
Added 3 tests in `InferFiltersFromConstraintsSuite`.
Author: maryannxue <maryann.xue@gmail.com>
Closes#20816 from maryannxue/spark-21479.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We are using `CodegenContext.freshName` to get a unique name for any new variable we are adding. Unfortunately, this method currently fails to create a unique name when we request more than one instance of variables with starting name `name1` and an instance with starting name `name11`.
The PR changes the way a new name is generated by `CodegenContext.freshName` so that we generate unique names in this scenario too.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21080 from mgaido91/SPARK-23986.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There was no check on nullability for arguments of `Tuple`s. This could lead to have weird behavior when a null value had to be deserialized into a non-nullable Scala object: in those cases, the `null` got silently transformed in a valid value (like `-1` for `Int`), corresponding to the default value we are using in the SQL codebase. This situation was very likely to happen when deserializing to a Tuple of primitive Scala types (like Double, Int, ...).
The PR adds the `AssertNotNull` to arguments of tuples which have been asked to be converted to non-nullable types.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20976 from mgaido91/SPARK-23835.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We don't have a good way to sequentially access `UnsafeArrayData` with a common interface such as `Seq`. An example is `MapObject` where we need to access several sequence collection types together. But `UnsafeArrayData` doesn't implement `ArrayData.array`. Calling `toArray` will copy the entire array. We can provide an `IndexedSeq` wrapper for `ArrayData`, so we can avoid copying the entire array.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20984 from viirya/SPARK-23875.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_min`. It takes an array as argument and returns the minimum value in it.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21025 from mgaido91/SPARK-23918.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, interpreted execution of `LambdaVariable` just uses `InternalRow.get` to access element. We should use specified accessors if possible.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20981 from viirya/SPARK-23873.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_max`. It takes an array as argument and returns the maximum value in it.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21024 from mgaido91/SPARK-23917.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add UDF weekday
## How was this patch tested?
A new test
Author: yucai <yyu1@ebay.com>
Closes#21009 from yucai/SPARK-23905.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to use `MemoryBlock` in `UTF8StringBuffer`. In general, there are two advantages to use `MemoryBlock`.
1. Has clean API calls rather than using a Java array or `PlatformMemory`
2. Improve runtime performance of memory access instead of using `Object`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added `UTF8StringBufferSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20871 from kiszk/SPARK-23762.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR slightly refactors the newly added `ExprValue` API by quite a bit. The following changes are introduced:
1. `ExprValue` now uses the actual class instead of the class name as its type. This should give some more flexibility with generating code in the future.
2. Renamed `StatementValue` to `SimpleExprValue`. The statement concept is broader then an expression (untyped and it cannot be on the right hand side of an assignment), and this was not really what we were using it for. I have added a top level `JavaCode` trait that can be used in the future to reinstate (no pun intended) a statement a-like code fragment.
3. Added factory methods to the `JavaCode` companion object to make it slightly less verbose to create `JavaCode`/`ExprValue` objects. This is also what makes the diff quite large.
4. Added one more factory method to `ExprCode` to make it easier to create code-less expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#21026 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23951.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The codegen output of `Expression`, aka `ExprCode`, now encapsulates only strings of output value (`value`) and nullability (`isNull`). It makes difficulty for us to know what the output really is. I think it is better if we can add wrappers for the value and nullability that let us to easily know that.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20043 from viirya/SPARK-22856.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoids possible overflow at an operation `long = (long)(int * int)`. The multiplication of large positive integer values may set one to MSB. This leads to a negative value in long while we expected a positive value (e.g. `0111_0000_0000_0000 * 0000_0000_0000_0010`).
This PR performs long cast before the multiplication to avoid this situation.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21002 from kiszk/SPARK-23893.
Fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23823
Keep origin for all the methods using transformExpression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Keep origin in transformExpression
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested that this fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23823 and columns have correct origins after Analyzer.analyze
Author: JiahuiJiang <jjiang@palantir.com>
Author: Jiahui Jiang <jjiang@palantir.com>
Closes#20961 from JiahuiJiang/jj/keep-origin.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allows us to use one of several types of `MemoryBlock`, such as byte array, int array, long array, or `java.nio.DirectByteBuffer`. To use `java.nio.DirectByteBuffer` allows to have off heap memory which is automatically deallocated by JVM. `MemoryBlock` class has primitive accessors like `Platform.getInt()`, `Platform.putint()`, or `Platform.copyMemory()`.
This PR uses `MemoryBlock` for `OffHeapColumnVector`, `UTF8String`, and other places. This PR can improve performance of operations involving memory accesses (e.g. `UTF8String.trim`) by 1.8x.
For now, this PR does not use `MemoryBlock` for `BufferHolder` based on cloud-fan's [suggestion](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11494#issuecomment-309694290).
Since this PR is a successor of #11494, close#11494. Many codes were ported from #11494. Many efforts were put here. **I think this PR should credit to yzotov.**
This PR can achieve **1.1-1.4x performance improvements** for operations in `UTF8String` or `Murmur3_x86_32`. Other operations are almost comparable performances.
Without this PR
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2-b13 on Linux 4.4.0-22-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2-b13 on Linux 4.4.0-22-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Hash byte arrays with length 268435487: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Murmur3_x86_32 526 / 536 0.0 131399881.5 1.0X
UTF8String benchmark: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hashCode 525 / 552 1022.6 1.0 1.0X
substring 414 / 423 1298.0 0.8 1.3X
```
With this PR
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2-b13 on Linux 4.4.0-22-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Hash byte arrays with length 268435487: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Murmur3_x86_32 474 / 488 0.0 118552232.0 1.0X
UTF8String benchmark: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hashCode 476 / 480 1127.3 0.9 1.0X
substring 287 / 291 1869.9 0.5 1.7X
```
Benchmark program
```
test("benchmark Murmur3_x86_32") {
val length = 8192 * 32768 + 31
val seed = 42L
val iters = 1 << 2
val random = new Random(seed)
val arrays = Array.fill[MemoryBlock](numArrays) {
val bytes = new Array[Byte](length)
random.nextBytes(bytes)
new ByteArrayMemoryBlock(bytes, Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET, length)
}
val benchmark = new Benchmark("Hash byte arrays with length " + length,
iters * numArrays, minNumIters = 20)
benchmark.addCase("HiveHasher") { _: Int =>
var sum = 0L
for (_ <- 0L until iters) {
sum += HiveHasher.hashUnsafeBytesBlock(
arrays(i), Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET, length)
}
}
benchmark.run()
}
test("benchmark UTF8String") {
val N = 512 * 1024 * 1024
val iters = 2
val benchmark = new Benchmark("UTF8String benchmark", N, minNumIters = 20)
val str0 = new java.io.StringWriter() { { for (i <- 0 until N) { write(" ") } } }.toString
val s0 = UTF8String.fromString(str0)
benchmark.addCase("hashCode") { _: Int =>
var h: Int = 0
for (_ <- 0L until iters) { h += s0.hashCode }
}
benchmark.addCase("substring") { _: Int =>
var s: UTF8String = null
for (_ <- 0L until iters) { s = s0.substring(N / 2 - 5, N / 2 + 5) }
}
benchmark.run()
}
```
I run [this benchmark program](https://gist.github.com/kiszk/94f75b506c93a663bbbc372ffe8f05de) using [the commit](ee5a79861c). I got the following results:
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2-b12 on Linux 4.4.0-66-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Memory access benchmarks: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ByteArrayMemoryBlock get/putInt() 220 / 221 609.3 1.6 1.0X
Platform get/putInt(byte[]) 220 / 236 610.9 1.6 1.0X
Platform get/putInt(Object) 492 / 494 272.8 3.7 0.4X
OnHeapMemoryBlock get/putLong() 322 / 323 416.5 2.4 0.7X
long[] 221 / 221 608.0 1.6 1.0X
Platform get/putLong(long[]) 321 / 321 418.7 2.4 0.7X
Platform get/putLong(Object) 561 / 563 239.2 4.2 0.4X
```
I also run [this benchmark program](https://gist.github.com/kiszk/5fdb4e03733a5d110421177e289d1fb5) for comparing performance of `Platform.copyMemory()`.
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2-b12 on Linux 4.4.0-66-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Platform copyMemory: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Object to Object 1961 / 1967 8.6 116.9 1.0X
System.arraycopy Object to Object 1917 / 1921 8.8 114.3 1.0X
byte array to byte array 1961 / 1968 8.6 116.9 1.0X
System.arraycopy byte array to byte array 1909 / 1937 8.8 113.8 1.0X
int array to int array 1921 / 1990 8.7 114.5 1.0X
double array to double array 1918 / 1923 8.7 114.3 1.0X
Object to byte array 1961 / 1967 8.6 116.9 1.0X
Object to short array 1965 / 1972 8.5 117.1 1.0X
Object to int array 1910 / 1915 8.8 113.9 1.0X
Object to float array 1971 / 1978 8.5 117.5 1.0X
Object to double array 1919 / 1944 8.7 114.4 1.0X
byte array to Object 1959 / 1967 8.6 116.8 1.0X
int array to Object 1961 / 1970 8.6 116.9 1.0X
double array to Object 1917 / 1924 8.8 114.3 1.0X
```
These results show three facts:
1. According to the second/third or sixth/seventh results in the first experiment, if we use `Platform.get/putInt(Object)`, we achieve more than 2x worse performance than `Platform.get/putInt(byte[])` with concrete type (i.e. `byte[]`).
2. According to the second/third or fourth/fifth/sixth results in the first experiment, the fastest way to access an array element on Java heap is `array[]`. **Cons of `array[]` is that it is not possible to support unaligned-8byte access.**
3. According to the first/second/third or fourth/sixth/seventh results in the first experiment, `getInt()/putInt() or getLong()/putLong()` in subclasses of `MemoryBlock` can achieve comparable performance to `Platform.get/putInt()` or `Platform.get/putLong()` with concrete type (second or sixth result). There is no overhead regarding virtual call.
4. According to results in the second experiment, for `Platform.copy()`, to pass `Object` can achieve the same performance as to pass any type of primitive array as source or destination.
5. According to second/fourth results in the second experiment, `Platform.copy()` can achieve the same performance as `System.arrayCopy`. **It would be good to use `Platform.copy()` since `Platform.copy()` can take any types for src and dst.**
We are incrementally replace `Platform.get/putXXX` with `MemoryBlock.get/putXXX`. This is because we have two advantages.
1) Achieve better performance due to having a concrete type for an array.
2) Use simple OO design instead of passing `Object`
It is easy to use `MemoryBlock` in `InternalRow`, `BufferHolder`, `TaskMemoryManager`, and others that are already abstracted. It is not easy to use `MemoryBlock` in utility classes related to hashing or others.
Other candidates are
- UnsafeRow, UnsafeArrayData, UnsafeMapData, SpecificUnsafeRowJoiner
- UTF8StringBuffer
- BufferHolder
- TaskMemoryManager
- OnHeapColumnVector
- BytesToBytesMap
- CachedBatch
- classes for hash
- others.
## How was this patch tested?
Added `UnsafeMemoryAllocator`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19222 from kiszk/SPARK-10399.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add interpreted execution for `InitializeJavaBean` expression.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20985 from viirya/SPARK-23593-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added interpreted execution for `StaticInvoke`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20753 from kiszk/SPARK-23582.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add interpreted execution for `InitializeJavaBean` expression.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20756 from viirya/SPARK-23593.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added interpreted execution for `Invoke`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20797 from kiszk/SPARK-28583.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add cast to nulls introduced by PropagateEmptyRelation so in cases they're part of coalesce they will not break its type checking rules
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test
Author: Robert Kruszewski <robertk@palantir.com>
Closes#20914 from robert3005/rk/propagate-empty-fix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add interpreted execution for `MapObjects` expression.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20771 from viirya/SPARK-23587.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implemented the following cleanups related to `UnsafeWriter` class:
- Remove code duplication between `UnsafeRowWriter` and `UnsafeArrayWriter`
- Make `BufferHolder` class internal by delegating its accessor methods to `UnsafeWriter`
- Replace `UnsafeRow.setTotalSize(...)` with `UnsafeRowWriter.setTotalSize()`
## How was this patch tested?
Tested by existing UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20850 from kiszk/SPARK-23713.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to improve the test coverage of the original PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20687
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20911 from gatorsmile/addTests.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The UUID() expression is stateful and should implement the `Stateful` trait instead of the `Nondeterministic` trait.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20912 from viirya/SPARK-23794.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an incorrect comparison in SQL between timestamp and date. This is because both of them are casted to `string` and then are compared lexicographically. This implementation shows `false` regarding this query `spark.sql("select cast('2017-03-01 00:00:00' as timestamp) between cast('2017-02-28' as date) and cast('2017-03-01' as date)").show`.
This PR shows `true` for this query by casting `date("2017-03-01")` to `timestamp("2017-03-01 00:00:00")`.
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Added new UTs to `TypeCoercionSuite`.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20774 from kiszk/SPARK-23549.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As stated in Jira, there are problems with current `Uuid` expression which uses `java.util.UUID.randomUUID` for UUID generation.
This patch uses the newly added `RandomUUIDGenerator` for UUID generation. So we can make `Uuid` deterministic between retries.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20861 from viirya/SPARK-23599-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed `CodegenContext.withSubExprEliminationExprs()` so that it saves/restores CSE state correctly.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit test to verify that the old CSE state is indeed saved and restored around the `withSubExprEliminationExprs()` call. Manually verified that this test fails without this patch.
Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Closes#20870 from rednaxelafx/codegen-subexpr-fix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Complex type simplification optimizer rules were not applied to the
entire plan, just the expressions reachable from the root node. This
patch fixes the rules to transform the entire plan.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit test + ran sql / core tests.
Author: Henry Robinson <henry@apache.org>
Author: Henry Robinson <henry@cloudera.com>
Closes#20687 from henryr/spark-25000.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds a UUID generator from Pseudo-Random Numbers. We can use it later to have deterministic `UUID()` expression.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20817 from viirya/SPARK-23599.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently can only create unsafe rows using code generation. This is a problem for situations in which code generation fails. There is no fallback, and as a result we cannot execute the query.
This PR adds an interpreted version of `UnsafeProjection`. The implementation is modeled after `InterpretedMutableProjection`. It stores the expression results in a `GenericInternalRow`, and it then uses a conversion function to convert the `GenericInternalRow` into an `UnsafeRow`.
This PR does not implement the actual code generated to interpreted fallback logic. This will be done in a follow-up.
## How was this patch tested?
I am piggybacking on exiting `UnsafeProjection` tests, and I have added an interpreted version for each of these.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#20750 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23581.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables assertions in `XXH64Suite.testKnownByteArrayInputs()` on big endian platform, too. The current implementation performs them only on little endian platform. This PR increase test coverage of big endian platform.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated `XXH64Suite`
Tested on big endian platform using JIT compiler or interpreter `-Xint`.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20804 from kiszk/SPARK-23656.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The error message ```s"""Field "$name" does not exist."""``` is thrown when looking up an unknown field in StructType. In the error message, we should also contain the information about which columns/fields exist in this struct.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests.
Note: I created a new `StructTypeSuite.scala` as I couldn't find an existing suite that's suitable to place these tests. I may be missing something so feel free to propose new locations.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Xiayun Sun <xiayunsun@gmail.com>
Closes#20649 from xysun/SPARK-23462.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The from_json() function accepts an additional parameter, where the user might specify the schema. The issue is that the specified schema might not be compatible with data. In particular, the JSON data might be missing data for fields declared as non-nullable in the schema. The from_json() function does not verify the data against such errors. When data with missing fields is sent to the parquet encoder, there is no verification either. The end results is a corrupt parquet file.
To avoid corruptions, make sure that all fields in the user-specified schema are set to be nullable.
Since this changes the behavior of a public function, we need to include it in release notes.
The behavior can be reverted by setting `spark.sql.fromJsonForceNullableSchema=false`
## How was this patch tested?
Added two new tests.
Author: Michał Świtakowski <michal.switakowski@databricks.com>
Closes#20694 from mswit-databricks/SPARK-23173.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`PrintToStderr` was doing what is it supposed to only when code generation is enabled.
The PR adds the same behavior in interpreted mode too.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20773 from mgaido91/SPARK-23602.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There was a bug in `calculateParamLength` which caused it to return always 1 + the number of expressions. This could lead to Exceptions especially with expressions of type long.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT + fixed previous UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20772 from mgaido91/SPARK-23628.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to DecodeUsingSerializer.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20760 from mgaido91/SPARK-23592.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to EncodeUsingSerializer.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20751 from mgaido91/SPARK-23591.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added a helper function in `ExpressionEvalHelper` to check exceptions in all the path of expression evaluation.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified the existing tests.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20748 from maropu/SPARK-23611.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to CreateExternalRow
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20749 from mgaido91/SPARK-23590.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added interpreted execution for `GetExternalRowField`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20746 from maropu/SPARK-23594.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to WrapOption.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20741 from mgaido91/SPARK-23586_2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds interpreted execution to UnwrapOption.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20736 from mgaido91/SPARK-23586.
