## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We changed the parser to reject unaliased subqueries in the FROM clause in SPARK-20690. However, the error message that we now give isn't very helpful:
scala> sql("""SELECT x FROM (SELECT 1 AS x)""")
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
mismatched input 'FROM' expecting {<EOF>, 'WHERE', 'GROUP', 'ORDER', 'HAVING', 'LIMIT', 'LATERAL', 'WINDOW', 'UNION', 'EXCEPT', 'MINUS', 'INTERSECT', 'SORT', 'CLUSTER', 'DISTRIBUTE'}(line 1, pos 9)
We should modify the parser to throw a more clear error for such queries:
scala> sql("""SELECT x FROM (SELECT 1 AS x)""")
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
The unaliased subqueries in the FROM clause are not supported.(line 1, pos 14)
## How was this patch tested?
Modified existing tests to reflect this change.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#18141 from viirya/SPARK-20916.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add build-int SQL function - DAYOFWEEK
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Closes#18134 from wangyum/SPARK-20909.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds built-in SQL function `(REPLACE(<string_expression>, <search_string> [, <replacement_string>])`
`REPLACE()` return that string that is replaced all occurrences with given string.
## How was this patch tested?
added new test suites
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#18047 from kiszk/SPARK-20750.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
See class doc of `ConstantPropagation` for the approach used.
## How was this patch tested?
- Added unit tests
Author: Tejas Patil <tejasp@fb.com>
Closes#17993 from tejasapatil/SPARK-20758_const_propagation.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added parsing rules to support table column aliases in FROM clause.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `PlanParserSuite`, `SQLQueryTestSuite`, and `PlanParserSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#18079 from maropu/SPARK-20841.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Cache manager, the plan matching should ignore Hint.
```Scala
val df1 = spark.range(10).join(broadcast(spark.range(10)))
df1.cache()
spark.range(10).join(spark.range(10)).explain()
```
The output plan of the above query shows that the second query is not using the cached data of the first query.
```
BroadcastNestedLoopJoin BuildRight, Inner
:- *Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=2)
+- BroadcastExchange IdentityBroadcastMode
+- *Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=2)
```
After the fix, the plan becomes
```
InMemoryTableScan [id#20L, id#23L]
+- InMemoryRelation [id#20L, id#23L], true, 10000, StorageLevel(disk, memory, deserialized, 1 replicas)
+- BroadcastNestedLoopJoin BuildRight, Inner
:- *Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=2)
+- BroadcastExchange IdentityBroadcastMode
+- *Range (0, 10, step=1, splits=2)
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test.
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#18131 from gatorsmile/HintCache.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
spark-sql>SELECT ceil(cast(12345.1233 as float));
spark-sql>12345
For this case, the result we expected is `12346`
spark-sql>SELECT floor(cast(-12345.1233 as float));
spark-sql>-12345
For this case, the result we expected is `-12346`
Because in `Ceil` or `Floor`, `inputTypes` has no FloatType, so it is converted to LongType.
## How was this patch tested?
After the modification:
spark-sql>SELECT ceil(cast(12345.1233 as float));
spark-sql>12346
spark-sql>SELECT floor(cast(-12345.1233 as float));
spark-sql>-12346
Author: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Closes#18103 from 10110346/wip-lx-0525-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add built-in SQL function `CH[A]R`:
For `CHR(bigint|double n)`, returns the ASCII character having the binary equivalent to `n`. If n is larger than 256 the result is equivalent to CHR(n % 256)
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Closes#18019 from wangyum/SPARK-20748.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is reported that there is performance downgrade when applying ML pipeline for dataset with many columns but few rows.
A big part of the performance downgrade comes from some operations (e.g., `select`) on DataFrame/Dataset which re-create new DataFrame/Dataset with a new `LogicalPlan`. The cost can be ignored in the usage of SQL, normally.
However, it's not rare to chain dozens of pipeline stages in ML. When the query plan grows incrementally during running those stages, the total cost spent on re-creation of DataFrame grows too. In particular, the `Analyzer` will go through the big query plan even most part of it is analyzed.
By eliminating part of the cost, the time to run the example code locally is reduced from about 1min to about 30 secs.
In particular, the time applying the pipeline locally is mostly spent on calling transform of the 137 `Bucketizer`s. Before the change, each call of `Bucketizer`'s transform can cost about 0.4 sec. So the total time spent on all `Bucketizer`s' transform is about 50 secs. After the change, each call only costs about 0.1 sec.
<del>We also make `boundEnc` as lazy variable to reduce unnecessary running time.</del>
### Performance improvement
The codes and datasets provided by Barry Becker to re-produce this issue and benchmark can be found on the JIRA.
Before this patch: about 1 min
After this patch: about 20 secs
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#17770 from viirya/SPARK-20392.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up to SPARK-20857 to move the broadcast hint from Statistics into a new HintInfo class, so we can be more flexible in adding new hints in the future.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated test cases to reflect the change.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#18087 from rxin/SPARK-20867.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch renames BroadcastHint to ResolvedHint (and Hint to UnresolvedHint) so the hint framework is more generic and would allow us to introduce other hint types in the future without introducing new hint nodes.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated test cases.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#18072 from rxin/SPARK-20857.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As srowen pointed in 609ba5f2b9 (commitcomment-22221259), the previous tests are not proper.
This follow-up is going to fix the tests.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#18048 from viirya/SPARK-20399-follow-up.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After we adding a new field `stats` into `CatalogTable`, we should not expose Hive-specific Stats metadata to `MetastoreRelation`. It complicates all the related codes. It also introduces a bug in `SHOW CREATE TABLE`. The statistics-related table properties should be skipped by `SHOW CREATE TABLE`, since it could be incorrect in the newly created table. See the Hive JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13792
Also fix the issue to fill Hive-generated RowCounts to our stats.
This PR is to handle Hive-specific Stats metadata in `HiveClientImpl`.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a few test cases.
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#14971 from gatorsmile/showCreateTableNew.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we have a bug when we specify `IF NOT EXISTS` in `INSERT OVERWRITE` data source tables. For example, given a query:
```SQL
INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE $tableName partition (b=2, c=3) IF NOT EXISTS SELECT 9, 10
```
we will get the following error:
```
unresolved operator 'InsertIntoTable Relation[a#425,d#426,b#427,c#428] parquet, Map(b -> Some(2), c -> Some(3)), true, true;;
'InsertIntoTable Relation[a#425,d#426,b#427,c#428] parquet, Map(b -> Some(2), c -> Some(3)), true, true
+- Project [cast(9#423 as int) AS a#429, cast(10#424 as int) AS d#430]
+- Project [9 AS 9#423, 10 AS 10#424]
+- OneRowRelation$
```
This PR is to fix the issue to follow the behavior of Hive serde tables
> INSERT OVERWRITE will overwrite any existing data in the table or partition unless IF NOT EXISTS is provided for a partition
### How was this patch tested?
Modified an existing test case
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#18050 from gatorsmile/insertPartitionIfNotExists.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
spark-sql>SELECT ceil(1234567890123456);
1234567890123456
spark-sql>SELECT ceil(12345678901234567);
12345678901234568
spark-sql>SELECT ceil(123456789012345678);
123456789012345680
when the length of the getText is greater than 16. long to double will be precision loss.
but mysql handle the value is ok.
mysql> SELECT ceil(1234567890123456);
+------------------------+
| ceil(1234567890123456) |
+------------------------+
| 1234567890123456 |
+------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> SELECT ceil(12345678901234567);
+-------------------------+
| ceil(12345678901234567) |
+-------------------------+
| 12345678901234567 |
+-------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> SELECT ceil(123456789012345678);
+--------------------------+
| ceil(123456789012345678) |
+--------------------------+
| 123456789012345678 |
+--------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
## How was this patch tested?
Supplement the unit test.
Author: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>
Closes#18016 from heary-cao/ceil_long.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
spark-sql>select month("1582-09-28");
spark-sql>10
For this case, the expected result is 9, but it is 10.
spark-sql>select day("1582-04-18");
spark-sql>28
For this case, the expected result is 18, but it is 28.
when the date before "1582-10-04", the function of `month` and `day` return the value which is not we expected.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Closes#17997 from 10110346/wip_lx_0516.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
GenerateUnsafeProjection.writeStructToBuffer() did not honor the assumption that the caller must make sure that a value is not null before using the getter. This could lead to various errors. This change fixes that behavior.
Example of code generated before:
```scala
/* 059 */ final UTF8String fieldName = value.getUTF8String(0);
/* 060 */ if (value.isNullAt(0)) {
/* 061 */ rowWriter1.setNullAt(0);
/* 062 */ } else {
/* 063 */ rowWriter1.write(0, fieldName);
/* 064 */ }
```
Example of code generated now:
```scala
/* 060 */ boolean isNull1 = value.isNullAt(0);
/* 061 */ UTF8String value1 = isNull1 ? null : value.getUTF8String(0);
/* 062 */ if (isNull1) {
/* 063 */ rowWriter1.setNullAt(0);
/* 064 */ } else {
/* 065 */ rowWriter1.write(0, value1);
/* 066 */ }
```
## How was this patch tested?
Adds GenerateUnsafeProjectionSuite.
Author: Ala Luszczak <ala@databricks.com>
Closes#18030 from ala/fix-generate-unsafe-projection.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the previous approach we used `aliasMap` to link an `Attribute` to the expression with potentially the form `f(a, b)`, but we only searched the `expressions` and `children.expressions` for this, which is not enough when an `Alias` may lies deep in the logical plan. In that case, we can't generate the valid equivalent constraint classes and thus we fail at preventing the recursive deductions.
We fix this problem by collecting all `Alias`s from the logical plan.
## How was this patch tested?
No additional test case is added, but do modified one test case to cover this situation.
Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Closes#18020 from jiangxb1987/inferConstrants.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We add missing attributes into Filter in Analyzer. But we shouldn't do it through subqueries like this:
select 1 from (select 1 from onerow t1 LIMIT 1) where t1.c1=1
This query works in current codebase. However, the outside where clause shouldn't be able to refer `t1.c1` attribute.
The root cause is we allow subqueries in FROM have no alias names previously, it is confusing and isn't supported by various databases such as MySQL, Postgres, Oracle. We shouldn't support it too.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#17935 from viirya/SPARK-20690.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Hive allows inserting data to bucketed table without guaranteeing bucketed and sorted-ness based on these two configs : `hive.enforce.bucketing` and `hive.enforce.sorting`.
What does this PR achieve ?
- Spark will disallow users from writing outputs to hive bucketed tables by default (given that output won't adhere with Hive's semantics).
- IF user still wants to write to hive bucketed table, the only resort is to use `hive.enforce.bucketing=false` and `hive.enforce.sorting=false` which means user does NOT care about bucketing guarantees.
Changes done in this PR:
- Extract table's bucketing information in `HiveClientImpl`
- While writing table info to metastore, `HiveClientImpl` now populates the bucketing information in the hive `Table` object
- `InsertIntoHiveTable` allows inserts to bucketed table only if both `hive.enforce.bucketing` and `hive.enforce.sorting` are `false`
Ability to create bucketed tables will enable adding test cases to Spark while I add more changes related to hive bucketing support. Design doc for hive hive bucketing support : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a8IDh23RAkrkg9YYAeO51F4aGO8-xAlupKwdshve2fc/edit#
## How was this patch tested?
- Added test for creating bucketed and sorted table.
- Added test to ensure that INSERTs fail if strict bucket / sort is enforced
- Added test to ensure that INSERTs can go through if strict bucket / sort is NOT enforced
- Added test to validate that bucketing information shows up in output of DESC FORMATTED
- Added test to ensure that `SHOW CREATE TABLE` works for hive bucketed tables
Author: Tejas Patil <tejasp@fb.com>
Closes#17644 from tejasapatil/SPARK-17729_create_bucketed_table.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added a new Optimizer rule to combine nested Concat. The master supports a pipeline operator '||' to concatenate strings in #17711 (This pr is follow-up). Since the parser currently generates nested Concat expressions, the optimizer needs to combine the nested expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CombineConcatSuite` and `SQLQueryTestSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#17970 from maropu/SPARK-20730.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes three things as below:
- Use casting rules to a timestamp in `to_timestamp` by default (it was `yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss`).
- Support single argument for `to_timestamp` similarly with APIs in other languages.
For example, the one below works
```
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
Seq("2016-12-31 00:12:00.00").toDF("a").select(to_timestamp(col("a"))).show()
```
prints
```
+----------------------------------------+
|to_timestamp(`a`, 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss')|
+----------------------------------------+
| 2016-12-31 00:12:00|
+----------------------------------------+
```
whereas this does not work in SQL.
**Before**
```
spark-sql> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31 00:12:00');
Error in query: Invalid number of arguments for function to_timestamp; line 1 pos 7
```
**After**
```
spark-sql> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31 00:12:00');
2016-12-31 00:12:00
```
- Related document improvement for SQL function descriptions and other API descriptions accordingly.
**Before**
```
spark-sql> DESCRIBE FUNCTION extended to_date;
...
Usage: to_date(date_str, fmt) - Parses the `left` expression with the `fmt` expression. Returns null with invalid input.
Extended Usage:
Examples:
> SELECT to_date('2016-12-31', 'yyyy-MM-dd');
2016-12-31
```
```
spark-sql> DESCRIBE FUNCTION extended to_timestamp;
...
Usage: to_timestamp(timestamp, fmt) - Parses the `left` expression with the `format` expression to a timestamp. Returns null with invalid input.
Extended Usage:
Examples:
> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31', 'yyyy-MM-dd');
2016-12-31 00:00:00.0
```
**After**
```
spark-sql> DESCRIBE FUNCTION extended to_date;
...
Usage:
to_date(date_str[, fmt]) - Parses the `date_str` expression with the `fmt` expression to
a date. Returns null with invalid input. By default, it follows casting rules to a date if
the `fmt` is omitted.
Extended Usage:
Examples:
> SELECT to_date('2009-07-30 04:17:52');
2009-07-30
> SELECT to_date('2016-12-31', 'yyyy-MM-dd');
2016-12-31
```
```
spark-sql> DESCRIBE FUNCTION extended to_timestamp;
...
Usage:
to_timestamp(timestamp[, fmt]) - Parses the `timestamp` expression with the `fmt` expression to
a timestamp. Returns null with invalid input. By default, it follows casting rules to
a timestamp if the `fmt` is omitted.
Extended Usage:
Examples:
> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31 00:12:00');
2016-12-31 00:12:00
> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31', 'yyyy-MM-dd');
2016-12-31 00:00:00
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `datetime.sql`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17901 from HyukjinKwon/to_timestamp_arg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
spark-sql>select bround(12.3, 2);
spark-sql>NULL
For this case, the expected result is 12.3, but it is null.
So ,when the second parameter is bigger than "decimal.scala", the result is not we expected.
"round" function has the same problem. This PR can solve the problem for both of them.
## How was this patch tested?
unit test cases in MathExpressionsSuite and MathFunctionsSuite
Author: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Closes#17906 from 10110346/wip_lx_0509.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The new SQL parser is introduced into Spark 2.0. All string literals are unescaped in parser. Seems it bring an issue regarding the regex pattern string.
The following codes can reproduce it:
val data = Seq("\u0020\u0021\u0023", "abc")
val df = data.toDF()
// 1st usage: works in 1.6
// Let parser parse pattern string
val rlike1 = df.filter("value rlike '^\\x20[\\x20-\\x23]+$'")
// 2nd usage: works in 1.6, 2.x
// Call Column.rlike so the pattern string is a literal which doesn't go through parser
val rlike2 = df.filter($"value".rlike("^\\x20[\\x20-\\x23]+$"))
// In 2.x, we need add backslashes to make regex pattern parsed correctly
val rlike3 = df.filter("value rlike '^\\\\x20[\\\\x20-\\\\x23]+$'")
Follow the discussion in #17736, this patch adds a config to fallback to 1.6 string literal parsing and mitigate migration issue.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#17887 from viirya/add-config-fallback-string-parsing.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added parsing rules to support aliases in table value functions.
The previous pr (#17666) has been reverted because of the regression. This new pr fixed the regression and add tests in `SQLQueryTestSuite`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `PlanParserSuite` and `SQLQueryTestSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#17928 from maropu/SPARK-20311-3.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In filter estimation, we update column stats for those columns in filter condition. However, if the number of rows decreases after the filter (i.e. the overall selectivity is less than 1), we need to update (scale down) the number of distinct values (NDV) for all columns, no matter they are in filter conditions or not.
This pr also fixes the inconsistency of rounding mode for ndv and rowCount.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Author: wangzhenhua <wangzhenhua@huawei.com>
Closes#17918 from wzhfy/scaleDownNdvAfterFilter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The query
```
SELECT 1 FROM (SELECT COUNT(*) WHERE FALSE) t1
```
should return a single row of output because the subquery is an aggregate without a group-by and thus should return a single row. However, Spark incorrectly returns zero rows.
This is caused by SPARK-16208 / #13906, a patch which added an optimizer rule to propagate EmptyRelation through operators. The logic for handling aggregates is wrong: it checks whether aggregate expressions are non-empty for deciding whether the output should be empty, whereas it should be checking grouping expressions instead:
An aggregate with non-empty grouping expression will return one output row per group. If the input to the grouped aggregate is empty then all groups will be empty and thus the output will be empty. It doesn't matter whether the aggregation output columns include aggregate expressions since that won't affect the number of output rows.
If the grouping expressions are empty, however, then the aggregate will always produce a single output row and thus we cannot propagate the EmptyRelation.
The current implementation is incorrect and also misses an optimization opportunity by not propagating EmptyRelation in the case where a grouped aggregate has aggregate expressions (in other words, `SELECT COUNT(*) from emptyRelation GROUP BY x` would _not_ be optimized to `EmptyRelation` in the old code, even though it safely could be).
This patch resolves this issue by modifying `PropagateEmptyRelation` to consider only the presence/absence of grouping expressions, not the aggregate functions themselves, when deciding whether to propagate EmptyRelation.
## How was this patch tested?
- Added end-to-end regression tests in `SQLQueryTest`'s `group-by.sql` file.
- Updated unit tests in `PropagateEmptyRelationSuite`.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#17929 from JoshRosen/fix-PropagateEmptyRelation.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added parsing rules to support aliases in table value functions.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `PlanParserSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#17666 from maropu/SPARK-20311.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix build warnings primarily related to Breeze 0.13 operator changes, Java style problems
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#17803 from srowen/SPARK-20523.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A fix for the same problem was made in #17693 but ignored `JsonToStructs`. This PR uses the same fix for `JsonToStructs`.
## How was this patch tested?
Regression test
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#17826 from brkyvz/SPARK-20549.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for the SQL standard distinct predicate to SPARK SQL.
```
<expression> IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM <expression>
```
## How was this patch tested?
Tested using unit tests, integration tests, manual tests.
Author: ptkool <michael.styles@shopify.com>
Closes#17764 from ptkool/is_not_distinct_from.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when the type string is invalid, it looks printing empty parentheses. This PR proposes a small improvement in an error message by removing it in the parse as below:
```scala
spark.range(1).select($"col".cast("aa"))
```
**Before**
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
DataType aa() is not supported.(line 1, pos 0)
== SQL ==
aa
^^^
```
**After**
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
DataType aa is not supported.(line 1, pos 0)
== SQL ==
aa
^^^
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in `DataTypeParserSuite`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17784 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-20492.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Relax the requirement that a `TimeZoneAwareExpression` has to have its `timeZoneId` set to be considered resolved.
With this change, a `Cast` (which is a `TimeZoneAwareExpression`) can be considered resolved if the `(fromType, toType)` combination doesn't require time zone information.
Also de-relaxed test cases in `CastSuite` so Casts in that test suite don't get a default`timeZoneId = Option("GMT")`.
## How was this patch tested?
Ran the de-relaxed`CastSuite` and it's passing. Also ran the SQL unit tests and they're passing too.
Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Closes#17777 from rednaxelafx/fix-catalyst-cast-timezone.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
change to using Jackson's `com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonFactory`
public JsonParser createParser(String content)
## How was this patch tested?
existing unit tests
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Eric Wasserman <ericw@sgn.com>
Closes#17693 from ewasserman/SPARK-20314.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoids an exception in the case where `scala.math.BigInt` has a value that does not fit into long value range (e.g. `Long.MAX_VALUE+1`). When we run the following code by using the current Spark, the following exception is thrown.
This PR keeps the value using `BigDecimal` if we detect such an overflow case by catching `ArithmeticException`.
Sample program:
```
case class BigIntWrapper(value:scala.math.BigInt)```
spark.createDataset(BigIntWrapper(scala.math.BigInt("10000000000000000002"))::Nil).show
```
Exception:
```
Error while encoding: java.lang.ArithmeticException: BigInteger out of long range
staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal$, DecimalType(38,0), apply, assertnotnull(assertnotnull(input[0, org.apache.spark.sql.BigIntWrapper, true])).value, true) AS value#0
java.lang.RuntimeException: Error while encoding: java.lang.ArithmeticException: BigInteger out of long range
staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal$, DecimalType(38,0), apply, assertnotnull(assertnotnull(input[0, org.apache.spark.sql.BigIntWrapper, true])).value, true) AS value#0
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.ExpressionEncoder.toRow(ExpressionEncoder.scala:290)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$2.apply(SparkSession.scala:454)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$2.apply(SparkSession.scala:454)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:381)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:285)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.createDataset(SparkSession.scala:454)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Agg$$anonfun$18.apply$mcV$sp(MySuite.scala:192)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Agg$$anonfun$18.apply(MySuite.scala:192)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Agg$$anonfun$18.apply(MySuite.scala:192)
at org.scalatest.Transformer$$anonfun$apply$1.apply$mcV$sp(Transformer.scala:22)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$class.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:85)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:104)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:22)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:20)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(FunSuiteLike.scala:166)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.withFixture(SparkFunSuite.scala:68)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$class.invokeWithFixture$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:163)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$$anonfun$runTest$1.apply(FunSuiteLike.scala:175)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$$anonfun$runTest$1.apply(FunSuiteLike.scala:175)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:306)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$class.runTest(FunSuiteLike.scala:175)
...
Caused by: java.lang.ArithmeticException: BigInteger out of long range
at java.math.BigInteger.longValueExact(BigInteger.java:4531)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal.set(Decimal.scala:140)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal$.apply(Decimal.scala:434)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal.apply(Decimal.scala)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$SpecificUnsafeProjection.apply(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.ExpressionEncoder.toRow(ExpressionEncoder.scala:287)
... 59 more
```
## How was this patch tested?
Add new test suite into `DecimalSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#17684 from kiszk/SPARK-20341.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is often useful to be able to track changes to the `ExternalCatalog`. This PR makes the `ExternalCatalog` emit events when a catalog object is changed. Events are fired before and after the change.
The following events are fired per object:
- Database
- CreateDatabasePreEvent: event fired before the database is created.
- CreateDatabaseEvent: event fired after the database has been created.
- DropDatabasePreEvent: event fired before the database is dropped.
- DropDatabaseEvent: event fired after the database has been dropped.
- Table
- CreateTablePreEvent: event fired before the table is created.
- CreateTableEvent: event fired after the table has been created.
- RenameTablePreEvent: event fired before the table is renamed.
- RenameTableEvent: event fired after the table has been renamed.
- DropTablePreEvent: event fired before the table is dropped.
- DropTableEvent: event fired after the table has been dropped.
- Function
- CreateFunctionPreEvent: event fired before the function is created.
- CreateFunctionEvent: event fired after the function has been created.
- RenameFunctionPreEvent: event fired before the function is renamed.
- RenameFunctionEvent: event fired after the function has been renamed.
- DropFunctionPreEvent: event fired before the function is dropped.
- DropFunctionPreEvent: event fired after the function has been dropped.
The current events currently only contain the names of the object modified. We add more events, and more details at a later point.
A user can monitor changes to the external catalog by adding a listener to the Spark listener bus checking for `ExternalCatalogEvent`s using the `SparkListener.onOtherEvent` hook. A more direct approach is add listener directly to the `ExternalCatalog`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added the `ExternalCatalogEventSuite`.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#17710 from hvanhovell/SPARK-20420.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A cast expression with a resolved time zone is not equal to a cast expression without a resolved time zone. The `ResolveAggregateFunction` assumed that these expression were the same, and would fail to resolve `HAVING` clauses which contain a `Cast` expression.
This is in essence caused by the fact that a `TimeZoneAwareExpression` can be resolved without a set time zone. This PR fixes this, and makes a `TimeZoneAwareExpression` unresolved as long as it has no TimeZone set.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a regression test to the `SQLQueryTestSuite.having` file.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#17641 from hvanhovell/SPARK-20329.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Apply Complementation Laws during boolean expression simplification.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested using unit tests, integration tests, and manual tests.
Author: ptkool <michael.styles@shopify.com>
Author: Michael Styles <michael.styles@shopify.com>
Closes#17650 from ptkool/apply_complementation_laws.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If a plan has multi-level successive joins, e.g.:
```
Join
/ \
Union t5
/ \
Join t4
/ \
Join t3
/ \
t1 t2
```
Currently we fail to reorder the inside joins, i.e. t1, t2, t3.
In join reorder, we use `OrderedJoin` to indicate a join has been ordered, such that when transforming down the plan, these joins don't need to be rerodered again.
But there's a problem in the definition of `OrderedJoin`:
The real join node is a parameter, but not a child. This breaks the transform procedure because `mapChildren` applies transform function on parameters which should be children.
In this patch, we change `OrderedJoin` to a class having the same structure as a join node.
## How was this patch tested?
Add a corresponding test case.
Author: wangzhenhua <wangzhenhua@huawei.com>
Closes#17668 from wzhfy/recursiveReorder.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace non-existent `repartitionBy` with `distribute` in `CollapseRepartitionSuite`.
## How was this patch tested?
local build and `catalyst/testOnly *CollapseRepartitionSuite`
Author: Jacek Laskowski <jacek@japila.pl>
Closes#17657 from jaceklaskowski/CollapseRepartitionSuite.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes a bug in the way LIKE patterns are translated to Java regexes. The bug causes any character following an escaped backslash to be escaped, i.e. there is double-escaping.
A concrete example is the following pattern:`'%\\%'`. The expected Java regex that this pattern should correspond to (according to the behavior described below) is `'.*\\.*'`, however the current situation leads to `'.*\\%'` instead.
---
Update: in light of the discussion that ensued, we should explicitly define the expected behaviour of LIKE expressions, especially in certain edge cases. With the help of gatorsmile, we put together a list of different RDBMS and their variations wrt to certain standard features.
| RDBMS\Features | Wildcards | Default escape [1] | Case sensitivity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [MS SQL Server](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179859.aspx) | _, %, [], [^] | none | no |
| [Oracle](https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B12037_01/server.101/b10759/conditions016.htm) | _, % | none | yes |
| [DB2 z/OS](http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPEK_11.0.0/sqlref/src/tpc/db2z_likepredicate.html) | _, % | none | yes |
| [MySQL](http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/string-comparison-functions.html) | _, % | none | no |
| [PostreSQL](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/functions-matching.html) | _, % | \ | yes |
| [Hive](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+UDF) | _, % | none | yes |
| Current Spark | _, % | \ | yes |
[1] Default escape character: most systems do not have a default escape character, instead the user can specify one by calling a like expression with an escape argument [A] LIKE [B] ESCAPE [C]. This syntax is currently not supported by Spark, however I would volunteer to implement this feature in a separate ticket.
The specifications are often quite terse and certain scenarios are undocumented, so here is a list of scenarios that I am uncertain about and would appreciate any input. Specifically I am looking for feedback on whether or not Spark's current behavior should be changed.
1. [x] Ending a pattern with the escape sequence, e.g. `like 'a\'`.
PostreSQL gives an error: 'LIKE pattern must not end with escape character', which I personally find logical. Currently, Spark allows "non-terminated" escapes and simply ignores them as part of the pattern.
According to [DB2's documentation](http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_9.7.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.messages.sql.doc/doc/msql00130n.html), ending a pattern in an escape character is invalid.
_Proposed new behaviour in Spark: throw AnalysisException_
2. [x] Empty input, e.g. `'' like ''`
Postgres and DB2 will match empty input only if the pattern is empty as well, any other combination of empty input will not match. Spark currently follows this rule.
3. [x] Escape before a non-special character, e.g. `'a' like '\a'`.
Escaping a non-wildcard character is not really documented but PostgreSQL just treats it verbatim, which I also find the least surprising behavior. Spark does the same.
According to [DB2's documentation](http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_9.7.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.messages.sql.doc/doc/msql00130n.html), it is invalid to follow an escape character with anything other than an escape character, an underscore or a percent sign.
_Proposed new behaviour in Spark: throw AnalysisException_
The current specification is also described in the operator's source code in this patch.
## How was this patch tested?
Extra case in regex unit tests.
Author: Jakob Odersky <jakob@odersky.com>
This patch had conflicts when merged, resolved by
Committer: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#15398 from jodersky/SPARK-17647.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently when estimating predicates like col > literal or col = literal, we will update min or max in column stats based on literal value. However, literal value is of Catalyst type (internal type), while min/max is of external type. Then for the next predicate, we again need to do type conversion to compare and update column stats. This is awkward and causes many unnecessary conversions in estimation.
To solve this, we use Catalyst type for min/max in `ColumnStat`. Note that the persistent format in metastore is still of external type, so there's no inconsistency for statistics in metastore.
This pr also fixes a bug for boolean type in `IN` condition.
## How was this patch tested?
The changes for ColumnStat are covered by existing tests.
For bug fix, a new test for boolean type in IN condition is added
Author: wangzhenhua <wangzhenhua@huawei.com>
Closes#17630 from wzhfy/refactorColumnStat.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Session catalog API `createTempFunction` is being used by Hive build-in functions, persistent functions, and temporary functions. Thus, the name is confusing. This PR is to rename it by `registerFunction`. Also we can move construction of `FunctionBuilder` and `ExpressionInfo` into the new `registerFunction`, instead of duplicating the logics everywhere.
In the next PRs, the remaining Function-related APIs also need cleanups.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases.
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#17615 from gatorsmile/cleanupCreateTempFunction.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to run Spark unidoc to test Javadoc 8 build as Javadoc 8 is easily re-breakable.
There are several problems with it:
- It introduces little extra bit of time to run the tests. In my case, it took 1.5 mins more (`Elapsed :[94.8746569157]`). How it was tested is described in "How was this patch tested?".
- > One problem that I noticed was that Unidoc appeared to be processing test sources: if we can find a way to exclude those from being processed in the first place then that might significantly speed things up.
(see joshrosen's [comment](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18692?focusedCommentId=15947627&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15947627))
To complete this automated build, It also suggests to fix existing Javadoc breaks / ones introduced by test codes as described above.
There fixes are similar instances that previously fixed. Please refer https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15999 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Note that this only fixes **errors** not **warnings**. Please see my observation https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389#issuecomment-288438704 for spurious errors by warnings.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually via `jekyll build` for building tests. Also, tested via running `./dev/run-tests`.
This was tested via manually adding `time.time()` as below:
```diff
profiles_and_goals = build_profiles + sbt_goals
print("[info] Building Spark unidoc (w/Hive 1.2.1) using SBT with these arguments: ",
" ".join(profiles_and_goals))
+ import time
+ st = time.time()
exec_sbt(profiles_and_goals)
+ print("Elapsed :[%s]" % str(time.time() - st))
```
produces
```
...
========================================================================
Building Unidoc API Documentation
========================================================================
...
[info] Main Java API documentation successful.
...
Elapsed :[94.8746569157]
...
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17477 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-18692.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we perform a cast expression and the from and to types are structurally the same (having the same structure but different field names), we should be able to skip the actual cast.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests for the newly introduced functions.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#17614 from rxin/SPARK-20302.
