## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new API to ` CodeGenenerator.splitExpression` since since several ` CodeGenenerator.splitExpression` are used with `ctx.INPUT_ROW` to avoid code duplication.
## How was this patch tested?
Used existing test suits
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19821 from kiszk/SPARK-22608.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, in the optimize rule `PropagateEmptyRelation`, the following cases is not handled:
1. empty relation as right child in left outer join
2. empty relation as left child in right outer join
3. empty relation as right child in left semi join
4. empty relation as right child in left anti join
5. only one empty relation in full outer join
case 1 / 2 / 5 can be treated as **Cartesian product** and cause exception. See the new test cases.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>
Closes#19825 from gengliangwang/SPARK-22615.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, relation size is computed as the sum of file size, which is error-prone because storage format like parquet may have a much smaller file size compared to in-memory size. When we choose broadcast join based on file size, there's a risk of OOM. But if the number of rows is available in statistics, we can get a better estimation by `numRows * rowSize`, which helps to alleviate this problem.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test case for data source table and hive table.
Author: Zhenhua Wang <wzh_zju@163.com>
Author: Zhenhua Wang <wangzhenhua@huawei.com>
Closes#19743 from wzhfy/better_leaf_size.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Mostly when we call `CodegenContext.splitExpressions`, we want to split the code into methods and pass the current inputs of the codegen context to these methods so that the code in these methods can still be evaluated.
This PR makes the expectation clear, while still keep the advanced version of `splitExpressions` to customize the inputs to pass to generated methods.
## How was this patch tested?
existing test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19827 from cloud-fan/codegen.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
a minor cleanup for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19752 . Remove the outer if as the code is inside `do while`
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19830 from cloud-fan/minor.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When converting Pandas DataFrame/Series from/to Spark DataFrame using `toPandas()` or pandas udfs, timestamp values behave to respect Python system timezone instead of session timezone.
For example, let's say we use `"America/Los_Angeles"` as session timezone and have a timestamp value `"1970-01-01 00:00:01"` in the timezone. Btw, I'm in Japan so Python timezone would be `"Asia/Tokyo"`.
The timestamp value from current `toPandas()` will be the following:
```
>>> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame([28801], "long").selectExpr("timestamp(value) as ts")
>>> df.show()
+-------------------+
| ts|
+-------------------+
|1970-01-01 00:00:01|
+-------------------+
>>> df.toPandas()
ts
0 1970-01-01 17:00:01
```
As you can see, the value becomes `"1970-01-01 17:00:01"` because it respects Python timezone.
As we discussed in #18664, we consider this behavior is a bug and the value should be `"1970-01-01 00:00:01"`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests and existing tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#19607 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-22395.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Code generation is disabled for CaseWhen when the number of branches is higher than `spark.sql.codegen.maxCaseBranches` (which defaults to 20). This was done to prevent the well known 64KB method limit exception.
This PR proposes to support code generation also in those cases (without causing exceptions of course). As a side effect, we could get rid of the `spark.sql.codegen.maxCaseBranches` configuration.
## How was this patch tested?
existing UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <mgaido@hortonworks.com>
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#19752 from mgaido91/SPARK-22520.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, relation stats is the same whether cbo is enabled or not. While relation (`LogicalRelation` or `HiveTableRelation`) is a `LogicalPlan`, its behavior is inconsistent with other plans. This can cause confusion when user runs EXPLAIN COST commands. Besides, when CBO is disabled, we apply the size-only estimation strategy, so there's no need to propagate other catalog statistics to relation.
## How was this patch tested?
Enhanced existing tests case and added a test case.
Author: Zhenhua Wang <wangzhenhua@huawei.com>
Closes#19757 from wzhfy/catalog_stats_conversion.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `FormatString` code generation to place generated code for expressions for arguments into separated methods if these size could be large.
This PR passes variable arguments by using an `Object` array.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases into `StringExpressionSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19817 from kiszk/SPARK-22603.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set `-ea` and `-Xss4m` consistently for tests, to fix in particular:
```
OrderingSuite:
...
- GenerateOrdering with ShortType
*** RUN ABORTED ***
java.lang.StackOverflowError:
at org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.flowAnalysis(CodeContext.java:370)
at org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.flowAnalysis(CodeContext.java:541)
at org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.flowAnalysis(CodeContext.java:541)
at org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.flowAnalysis(CodeContext.java:541)
at org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.flowAnalysis(CodeContext.java:541)
at org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.flowAnalysis(CodeContext.java:541)
at org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.flowAnalysis(CodeContext.java:541)
at org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.flowAnalysis(CodeContext.java:541)
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests. Manually verified it resolves the StackOverflowError this intends to resolve.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#19820 from srowen/SPARK-22607.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`ctx.currentVars` means the input variables for the current operator, which is already decided in `CodegenSupport`, we can set it there instead of `doConsume`.
also add more comments to help people understand the codegen framework.
After this PR, we now have a principle about setting `ctx.currentVars` and `ctx.INPUT_ROW`:
1. for non-whole-stage-codegen path, never set them. (permit some special cases like generating ordering)
2. for whole-stage-codegen `produce` path, mostly we don't need to set them, but blocking operators may need to set them for expressions that produce data from data source, sort buffer, aggregate buffer, etc.
3. for whole-stage-codegen `consume` path, mostly we don't need to set them because `currentVars` is automatically set to child input variables and `INPUT_ROW` is mostly not used. A few plans need to tweak them as they may have different inputs, or they use the input row.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19803 from cloud-fan/codegen.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR reduces the number of fields in the test case of `CastSuite` to fix an issue that is pointed at [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19800#issuecomment-346634950).
```
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.findClass(UnitCompiler.java:10971)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.findTypeByName(UnitCompiler.java:7607)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.getReferenceType(UnitCompiler.java:5758)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.getType2(UnitCompiler.java:5732)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$13200(UnitCompiler.java:206)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$18.visitReferenceType(UnitCompiler.java:5668)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$18.visitReferenceType(UnitCompiler.java:5660)
at org.codehaus.janino.Java$ReferenceType.accept(Java.java:3356)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.getType(UnitCompiler.java:5660)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.buildLocalVariableMap(UnitCompiler.java:2892)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:2764)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileDeclaredMethods(UnitCompiler.java:1262)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileDeclaredMethods(UnitCompiler.java:1234)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:538)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:890)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:894)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$600(UnitCompiler.java:206)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$2.visitMemberClassDeclaration(UnitCompiler.java:377)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$2.visitMemberClassDeclaration(UnitCompiler.java:369)
at org.codehaus.janino.Java$MemberClassDeclaration.accept(Java.java:1128)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:369)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileDeclaredMemberTypes(UnitCompiler.java:1209)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:564)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:890)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:894)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.access$600(UnitCompiler.java:206)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$2.visitMemberClassDeclaration(UnitCompiler.java:377)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler$2.visitMemberClassDeclaration(UnitCompiler.java:369)
at org.codehaus.janino.Java$MemberClassDeclaration.accept(Java.java:1128)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile(UnitCompiler.java:369)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compileDeclaredMemberTypes(UnitCompiler.java:1209)
at org.codehaus.janino.UnitCompiler.compile2(UnitCompiler.java:564)
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
Used existing test case
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19806 from kiszk/SPARK-22595.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When I played with codegen in developing another PR, I found the value of `CodegenContext.INPUT_ROW` is not reliable. Under wholestage codegen, it is assigned to null first and then suddenly changed to `i`.
The reason is `GenerateOrdering` changes `CodegenContext.INPUT_ROW` but doesn't restore it back.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#19800 from viirya/SPARK-22591.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A frequently reported issue of Spark is the Java 64kb compile error. This is because Spark generates a very big method and it's usually caused by 3 reasons:
1. a deep expression tree, e.g. a very complex filter condition
2. many individual expressions, e.g. expressions can have many children, operators can have many expressions.
3. a deep query plan tree (with whole stage codegen)
This PR focuses on 1. There are already several patches(#15620#18972#18641) trying to fix this issue and some of them are already merged. However this is an endless job as every non-leaf expression has this issue.
This PR proposes to fix this issue in `Expression.genCode`, to make sure the code for a single expression won't grow too big.
According to maropu 's benchmark, no regression is found with TPCDS (thanks maropu !): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1K3_7lX05-ZgxDXi9X_GleNnDjcnJIfoSlSCDZcL4gdg/edit?usp=sharing
## How was this patch tested?
existing test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Author: Wenchen Fan <cloud0fan@gmail.com>
Closes#19767 from cloud-fan/codegen.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses [the spelling miss](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436#discussion_r152189670) of the config name `spark.sql.columnVector.offheap.enabled`.
We should use `spark.sql.columnVector.offheap.enabled`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19794 from kiszk/SPARK-20101-follow.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `cast` code generation to place generated code for expression for fields of a structure into separated methods if these size could be large.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases into `CastSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19730 from kiszk/SPARK-22500.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to clean the usage of addMutableState and splitExpressions
1. replace hardcoded type string to ctx.JAVA_BOOLEAN etc.
2. create a default value of the initCode for ctx.addMutableStats
3. Use named arguments when calling `splitExpressions `
## How was this patch tested?
The existing test cases
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#19790 from gatorsmile/codeClean.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `elt` code generation to place generated code for expression for arguments into separated methods if these size could be large.
This PR resolved the case of `elt` with a lot of argument
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases into `StringExpressionsSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19778 from kiszk/SPARK-22550.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `GenerateUnsafeRowJoiner.create()` code generation to place generated code for statements to operate bitmap and offset into separated methods if these size could be large.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test case into `GenerateUnsafeRowJoinerSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19737 from kiszk/SPARK-22508.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `concat_ws` code generation to place generated code for expression for arguments into separated methods if these size could be large.
This PR resolved the case of `concat_ws` with a lot of argument
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases into `StringExpressionsSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19777 from kiszk/SPARK-22549.
This PR enables to use ``OffHeapColumnVector`` when ``spark.sql.columnVector.offheap.enable`` is set to ``true``. While ``ColumnVector`` has two implementations ``OnHeapColumnVector`` and ``OffHeapColumnVector``, only ``OnHeapColumnVector`` is always used.
This PR implements the followings
- Pass ``OffHeapColumnVector`` to ``ColumnarBatch.allocate()`` when ``spark.sql.columnVector.offheap.enable`` is set to ``true``
- Free all of off-heap memory regions by ``OffHeapColumnVector.close()``
- Ensure to call ``OffHeapColumnVector.close()``
Use existing tests
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#17436 from kiszk/SPARK-20101.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `concat` code generation to place generated code for expression for arguments into separated methods if these size could be large.
This PR resolved the case of `concat` with a lot of argument
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases into `StringExpressionsSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19728 from kiszk/SPARK-22498.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`ColumnarBatch` provides features to do fast filter and project in a columnar fashion, however this feature is never used by Spark, as Spark uses whole stage codegen and processes the data in a row fashion. This PR proposes to remove these unused features as we won't switch to columnar execution in the near future. Even we do, I think this part needs a proper redesign.
This is also a step to make `ColumnVector` public, as we don't wanna expose these features to users.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19766 from cloud-fan/vector.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `In` code generation to place generated code for expression for expressions for arguments into separated methods if these size could be large.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases into `PredicateSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19733 from kiszk/SPARK-22501.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Both `Coalesce` and `AtLeastNNonNulls` can cause the 64KB limit exception when used with a lot of arguments and/or complex expressions.
This PR splits their expressions in order to avoid the issue.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Author: Marco Gaido <mgaido@hortonworks.com>
Closes#19720 from mgaido91/SPARK-22494.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `least` and `greatest` code generation to place generated code for expression for arguments into separated methods if these size could be large.
This PR resolved two cases:
* `least` with a lot of argument
* `greatest` with a lot of argument
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test case into `ArithmeticExpressionsSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19729 from kiszk/SPARK-22499.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fixes a problem caused by #15880
`select '1.5' > 0.5; // Result is NULL in Spark but is true in Hive.
`
When compare string and numeric, cast them as double like Hive.
Author: liutang123 <liutang123@yeah.net>
Closes#19692 from liutang123/SPARK-22469.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Equi-height histogram is effective in cardinality estimation, and more accurate than basic column stats (min, max, ndv, etc) especially in skew distribution. So we need to support it.
For equi-height histogram, all buckets (intervals) have the same height (frequency).
In this PR, we use a two-step method to generate an equi-height histogram:
1. use `ApproximatePercentile` to get percentiles `p(0), p(1/n), p(2/n) ... p((n-1)/n), p(1)`;
2. construct range values of buckets, e.g. `[p(0), p(1/n)], [p(1/n), p(2/n)] ... [p((n-1)/n), p(1)]`, and use `ApproxCountDistinctForIntervals` to count ndv in each bucket. Each bucket is of the form: `(lowerBound, higherBound, ndv)`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases and modified some existing test cases.
Author: Zhenhua Wang <wangzhenhua@huawei.com>
Author: Zhenhua Wang <wzh_zju@163.com>
Closes#19479 from wzhfy/generate_histogram.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is a concern that Spark-side codegen row-by-row filtering might be faster than Parquet's one in general due to type-boxing and additional fuction calls which Spark's one tries to avoid.
So, this PR adds an option to disable/enable record-by-record filtering in Parquet side.
It sets the default to `false` to take the advantage of the improvement.
This was also discussed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14671.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually benchmarks were performed. I generated a billion (1,000,000,000) records and tested equality comparison concatenated with `OR`. This filter combinations were made from 5 to 30.
It seem indeed Spark-filtering is faster in the test case and the gap increased as the filter tree becomes larger.
The details are as below:
**Code**
``` scala
test("Parquet-side filter vs Spark-side filter - record by record") {
withTempPath { path =>
val N = 1000 * 1000 * 1000
val df = spark.range(N).toDF("a")
df.write.parquet(path.getAbsolutePath)
val benchmark = new Benchmark("Parquet-side vs Spark-side", N)
Seq(5, 10, 20, 30).foreach { num =>
val filterExpr = (0 to num).map(i => s"a = $i").mkString(" OR ")
benchmark.addCase(s"Parquet-side filter - number of filters [$num]", 3) { _ =>
withSQLConf(SQLConf.PARQUET_VECTORIZED_READER_ENABLED.key -> false.toString,
SQLConf.PARQUET_RECORD_FILTER_ENABLED.key -> true.toString) {
// We should strip Spark-side filter to compare correctly.
stripSparkFilter(
spark.read.parquet(path.getAbsolutePath).filter(filterExpr)).count()
}
}
benchmark.addCase(s"Spark-side filter - number of filters [$num]", 3) { _ =>
withSQLConf(SQLConf.PARQUET_VECTORIZED_READER_ENABLED.key -> false.toString,
SQLConf.PARQUET_RECORD_FILTER_ENABLED.key -> false.toString) {
spark.read.parquet(path.getAbsolutePath).filter(filterExpr).count()
}
}
}
benchmark.run()
}
}
```
**Result**
```
Parquet-side vs Spark-side: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parquet-side filter - number of filters [5] 4268 / 4367 234.3 4.3 0.8X
Spark-side filter - number of filters [5] 3709 / 3741 269.6 3.7 0.9X
Parquet-side filter - number of filters [10] 5673 / 5727 176.3 5.7 0.6X
Spark-side filter - number of filters [10] 3588 / 3632 278.7 3.6 0.9X
Parquet-side filter - number of filters [20] 8024 / 8440 124.6 8.0 0.4X
Spark-side filter - number of filters [20] 3912 / 3946 255.6 3.9 0.8X
Parquet-side filter - number of filters [30] 11936 / 12041 83.8 11.9 0.3X
Spark-side filter - number of filters [30] 3929 / 3978 254.5 3.9 0.8X
```
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#15049 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-17310.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `AND` or `OR` code generation to place condition and then expressions' generated code into separated methods if these size could be large. When the method is newly generated, variables for `isNull` and `value` are declared as an instance variable to pass these values (e.g. `isNull1409` and `value1409`) to the callers of the generated method.
This PR resolved two cases:
* large code size of left expression
* large code size of right expression
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test case into `CodeGenerationSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#18972 from kiszk/SPARK-21720.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes Spark to be able to read Parquet TIMESTAMP_MICROS values, and add a new config to allow Spark to write timestamp values to parquet as TIMESTAMP_MICROS type.
## How was this patch tested?
new test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19702 from cloud-fan/parquet.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Because of the memory leak issue in `scala.reflect.api.Types.TypeApi.<:<` (https://github.com/scala/bug/issues/8302), creating an encoder may leak memory.
This PR adds `cleanUpReflectionObjects` to clean up these leaking objects for methods calling `scala.reflect.api.Types.TypeApi.<:<`.
## How was this patch tested?
The updated unit tests.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
Closes#19687 from zsxwing/SPARK-19644.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
One powerful feature of `Dataset` is, we can easily map SQL rows to Scala/Java objects and do runtime null check automatically.
For example, let's say we have a parquet file with schema `<a: int, b: string>`, and we have a `case class Data(a: Int, b: String)`. Users can easily read this parquet file into `Data` objects, and Spark will throw NPE if column `a` has null values.
However the null checking is left behind for top-level primitive values. For example, let's say we have a parquet file with schema `<a: Int>`, and we read it into Scala `Int`. If column `a` has null values, we will get some weird results.
```
scala> val ds = spark.read.parquet(...).as[Int]
scala> ds.show()
+----+
|v |
+----+
|null|
|1 |
+----+
scala> ds.collect
res0: Array[Long] = Array(0, 1)
scala> ds.map(_ * 2).show
+-----+
|value|
+-----+
|-2 |
|2 |
+-----+
```
This is because internally Spark use some special default values for primitive types, but never expect users to see/operate these default value directly.
This PR adds null check for top-level primitive values
## How was this patch tested?
new test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19707 from cloud-fan/bug.
Continuation of PR#19528 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19529#issuecomment-340252119)
The problem with the maven build in the previous PR was the new tests.... the creation of a spark session outside the tests meant there was more than one spark session around at a time.
I was using the spark session outside the tests so that the tests could share data; I've changed it so that each test creates the data anew.
Author: Nathan Kronenfeld <nicole.oresme@gmail.com>
Author: Nathan Kronenfeld <nkronenfeld@uncharted.software>
Closes#19705 from nkronenfeld/alternative-style-tests-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We're building a data lineage tool in which we need to monitor the metadata changes in ExternalCatalog, current ExternalCatalog already provides several useful events like "CreateDatabaseEvent" for custom SparkListener to use. But still there's some event missing, like alter database event and alter table event. So here propose to and new ExternalCatalogEvent.
## How was this patch tested?
Enrich the current UT and tested on local cluster.
CC hvanhovell please let me know your comments about current proposal, thanks.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes#19649 from jerryshao/SPARK-22405.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For a class with field name of special characters, e.g.:
```scala
case class MyType(`field.1`: String, `field 2`: String)
```
Although we can manipulate DataFrame/Dataset, the field names are encoded:
```scala
scala> val df = Seq(MyType("a", "b"), MyType("c", "d")).toDF
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [field$u002E1: string, field$u00202: string]
scala> df.as[MyType].collect
res7: Array[MyType] = Array(MyType(a,b), MyType(c,d))
```
It causes resolving problem when we try to convert the data with non-encoded field names:
```scala
spark.read.json(path).as[MyType]
...
[info] org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '`field$u002E1`' given input columns: [field 2, fie
ld.1];
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.package$AnalysisErrorAt.failAnalysis(package.scala:42)
...
```
We should use decoded field name in Dataset schema.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#19664 from viirya/SPARK-22442.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since SPARK-21939, Apache Spark uses `TimeLimits` instead of the deprecated `Timeouts`. This PR fixes the build warning `BufferHolderSparkSubmitSuite.scala` introduced at [SPARK-22222](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19460/files#diff-d8cf6e0c229969db94ec8ffc31a9239cR36) by removing the redundant `Timeouts`.
```scala
trait Timeouts in package concurrent is deprecated: Please use org.scalatest.concurrent.TimeLimits instead
[warn] with Timeouts {
```
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#19697 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-22222.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
UDFs that can cause runtime exception on invalid data are not safe to pushdown, because its behavior depends on its position in the query plan. Pushdown of it will risk to change its original behavior.
The example reported in the JIRA and taken as test case shows this issue. We should declare UDFs that can cause runtime exception on invalid data as non-determinstic.
This updates the document of `deterministic` property in `Expression` and states clearly an UDF that can cause runtime exception on some specific input, should be declared as non-determinstic.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test. Manually test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#19662 from viirya/SPARK-22446.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`spark.sql.statistics.autoUpdate.size` should be `spark.sql.statistics.size.autoUpdate.enabled`. The previous name is confusing as users may treat it as a size config.
This config is in master branch only, no backward compatibility issue.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19667 from cloud-fan/minor.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`CodegenContext.copyResult` is kind of a global status for whole stage codegen. But the tricky part is, it is only used to transfer an information from child to parent when calling the `consume` chain. We have to be super careful in `produce`/`consume`, to set it to true when producing multiple result rows, and set it to false in operators that start new pipeline(like sort).
This PR moves the `copyResult` to `CodegenSupport`, and call it at `WholeStageCodegenExec`. This is much easier to reason about.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19656 from cloud-fan/whole-sage.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's not safe in all cases to push down a LIMIT below a FULL OUTER
JOIN. If the limit is pushed to one side of the FOJ, the physical
join operator can not tell if a row in the non-limited side would have a
match in the other side.
*If* the join operator guarantees that unmatched tuples from the limited
side are emitted before any unmatched tuples from the other side,
pushing down the limit is safe. But this is impractical for some join
implementations, e.g. SortMergeJoin.
For now, disable limit pushdown through a FULL OUTER JOIN, and we can
evaluate whether a more complicated solution is necessary in the future.
## How was this patch tested?
Ran org.apache.spark.sql.* tests. Altered full outer join tests in
LimitPushdownSuite.
Author: Henry Robinson <henry@cloudera.com>
Closes#19647 from henryr/spark-22211.
forward-port https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19622 to master branch.
This bug doesn't exist in master because we've added hive bucketing support and the hive bucketing metadata can be recognized by Spark, but we should still port it to master: 1) there may be other unsupported hive metadata removed by Spark. 2) reduce code difference between master and 2.2 to ease the backport in the feature.
***
When we alter table schema, we set the new schema to spark `CatalogTable`, convert it to hive table, and finally call `hive.alterTable`. This causes a problem in Spark 2.2, because hive bucketing metedata is not recognized by Spark, which means a Spark `CatalogTable` representing a hive table is always non-bucketed, and when we convert it to hive table and call `hive.alterTable`, the original hive bucketing metadata will be removed.
To fix this bug, we should read out the raw hive table metadata, update its schema, and call `hive.alterTable`. By doing this we can guarantee only the schema is changed, and nothing else.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19644 from cloud-fan/infer.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current join estimation logic is only based on basic column statistics (such as ndv, etc). If we want to add estimation for other kinds of statistics (such as histograms), it's not easy to incorporate into the current algorithm:
1. When we have multiple pairs of join keys, the current algorithm computes cardinality in a single formula. But if different join keys have different kinds of stats, the computation logic for each pair of join keys become different, so the previous formula does not apply.
2. Currently it computes cardinality and updates join keys' column stats separately. It's better to do these two steps together, since both computation and update logic are different for different kinds of stats.
## How was this patch tested?
Only refactor, covered by existing tests.
Author: Zhenhua Wang <wangzhenhua@huawei.com>
Closes#19531 from wzhfy/join_est_refactor.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `UnsafeInMemorySorter`, one record may take 32 bytes: 1 `long` for pointer, 1 `long` for key-prefix, and another 2 `long`s as the temporary buffer for radix sort.
In `UnsafeExternalSorter`, we set the `DEFAULT_NUM_ELEMENTS_FOR_SPILL_THRESHOLD` to be `1024 * 1024 * 1024 / 2`, and hoping the max size of point array to be 8 GB. However this is wrong, `1024 * 1024 * 1024 / 2 * 32` is actually 16 GB, and if we grow the point array before reach this limitation, we may hit the max-page-size error.
Users may see exception like this on large dataset:
```
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot allocate a page with more than 17179869176 bytes
at org.apache.spark.memory.TaskMemoryManager.allocatePage(TaskMemoryManager.java:241)
at org.apache.spark.memory.MemoryConsumer.allocatePage(MemoryConsumer.java:121)
at org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeExternalSorter.acquireNewPageIfNecessary(UnsafeExternalSorter.java:374)
at org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeExternalSorter.insertRecord(UnsafeExternalSorter.java:396)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeExternalRowSorter.insertRow(UnsafeExternalRowSorter.java:94)
...
```
Setting `DEFAULT_NUM_ELEMENTS_FOR_SPILL_THRESHOLD` to a smaller number is not enough, users can still set the config to a big number and trigger the too large page size issue. This PR fixes it by explicitly handling the too large page size exception in the sorter and spill.
This PR also change the type of `spark.shuffle.spill.numElementsForceSpillThreshold` to int, because it's only compared with `numRecords`, which is an int. This is an internal conf so we don't have a serious compatibility issue.
## How was this patch tested?
TODO
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#18251 from cloud-fan/sort.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This issue was discovered and investigated by Ohad Raviv and Sean Owen in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21657. The input data of `MapObjects` may be a `List` which has O(n) complexity for accessing by index. When converting input data to catalyst array, `MapObjects` gets element by index in each loop, and results to bad performance.
This PR fixes this issue by accessing elements via Iterator.
## How was this patch tested?
using the test script in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21657
```
val BASE = 100000000
val N = 100000
val df = sc.parallelize(List(("1234567890", (BASE to (BASE+N)).map(x => (x.toString, (x+1).toString, (x+2).toString, (x+3).toString)).toList ))).toDF("c1", "c_arr")
spark.time(df.queryExecution.toRdd.foreach(_ => ()))
```
We can see 50x speed up.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19603 from cloud-fan/map-objects.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix three deprecation warnings introduced by move to ANTLR 4.7:
* Use ParserRuleContext.addChild(TerminalNode) in preference to
deprecated ParserRuleContext.addChild(Token) interface.
* TokenStream.reset() is deprecated in favour of seek(0)
* Replace use of deprecated ANTLRInputStream with stream returned by
CharStreams.fromString()
The last item changed the way we construct ANTLR's input stream (from
direct instantiation to factory construction), so necessitated a change
to how we override the LA() method to always return an upper-case
char. The ANTLR object is now wrapped, rather than inherited-from.
* Also fix incorrect usage of CharStream.getText() which expects the rhs
of the supplied interval to be the last char to be returned, i.e. the
interval is inclusive, and work around bug in ANTLR 4.7 where empty
streams or intervals may cause getText() to throw an error.
## How was this patch tested?
Ran all the sql tests. Confirmed that LA() override has coverage by
breaking it, and noting that tests failed.
Author: Henry Robinson <henry@apache.org>
Closes#19578 from henryr/spark-21983.
