### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add weight support in KMeans
### Why are the changes needed?
KMeans should support weighting
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. ```KMeans.setWeightCol```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit Tests
Closes#26739 from huaxingao/spark-29967.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add ```setWeightCol``` and ```setMinWeightFractionPerNode``` in Python side of ```GBTClassifier``` and ```GBTRegressor```
### Why are the changes needed?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25926 added ```setWeightCol``` and ```setMinWeightFractionPerNode``` in GBTs on scala side. This PR will add ```setWeightCol``` and ```setMinWeightFractionPerNode``` in GBTs on python side
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
doc test
Closes#26774 from huaxingao/spark-30146.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
MNB/CNB/BNB use empty sigma matrix instead of null
### Why are the changes needed?
1,Using empty sigma matrix will simplify the impl
2,I am reviewing FM impl these days, FMModels have optional bias and linear part. It seems more reasonable to set optional part an empty vector/matrix or zero value than `null`
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, sigma from `null` to empty matrix
### How was this patch tested?
updated testsuites
Closes#26679 from zhengruifeng/nb_use_empty_sigma.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Summarizer support more metrics: sum, std
### Why are the changes needed?
Those metrics are widely used, it will be convenient to directly obtain them other than a conversion.
in `NaiveBayes`: we want the sum of vectors, mean & weightSum need to computed then multiplied
in `StandardScaler`,`AFTSurvivalRegression`,`LinearRegression`,`LinearSVC`,`LogisticRegression`: we need to obtain `variance` and then sqrt it to get std
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, new metrics are exposed to end users
### How was this patch tested?
added testsuites
Closes#26596 from zhengruifeng/summarizer_add_metrics.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
MulticlassClassificationEvaluator support hammingLoss
### Why are the changes needed?
1, it is an easy to compute hammingLoss based on confusion matrix
2, scikit-learn supports it
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes
### How was this patch tested?
added testsuites
Closes#26597 from zhengruifeng/multi_class_hamming_loss.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Impl Complement Naive Bayes Classifier as a `modelType` option in `NaiveBayes`
### Why are the changes needed?
1, it is a better choice for text classification: it is said in [scikit-learn](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/naive_bayes.html#complement-naive-bayes) that 'CNB regularly outperforms MNB (often by a considerable margin) on text classification tasks.'
2, CNB is highly similar to existing MNB, only a small part of existing MNB need to be changed, so it is a easy win to support CNB.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, a new `modelType` is supported
### How was this patch tested?
added testsuites
Closes#26575 from zhengruifeng/cnb.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
modify Param._copyValues to check valid Param objects supplied as extra
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Estimator.fit() and Model.transform() accept a dictionary of extra parameters whose values are used to overwrite those supplied at initialization or by default. Additionally, the ParamGridBuilder.addGrid accepts a parameter and list of values. The keys are presumed to be valid Param objects. This change adds a check that only Param objects are supplied as keys.
### Why are the changes needed?
Param objects are created by and bound to an instance of Params (Estimator, Model, or Transformer). They may be obtained from their parent as attributes, or by name through getParam.
The documentation does not state that keys must be valid Param objects, nor describe how one may be obtained. The current behavior is to silently ignore keys which are not valid Param objects.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
If the user does not pass in a Param object as required for keys in `extra` for Estimator.fit() and Model.transform(), and `param` for ParamGridBuilder.addGrid, an error will be raised indicating it is an invalid object.
### How was this patch tested?
Added method test_copy_param_extras_check to test_param.py. Tested with Python 3.7
Closes#26527 from JohnHBauer/paramExtra.
Authored-by: John Bauer <john.h.bauer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
support `modelType` `gaussian`
### Why are the changes needed?
current modelTypes do not support continuous data
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, add a `modelType` option
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsuites and added ones
Closes#26413 from zhengruifeng/gnb.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add ```__repr__``` in Python ML Models
### Why are the changes needed?
In Python ML Models, some of them have ```__repr__```, others don't. In the doctest, when calling Model.setXXX, some of the Models print out the xxxModel... correctly, some of them can't because of lacking the ```__repr__``` method. For example:
```
>>> gm = GaussianMixture(k=3, tol=0.0001, seed=10)
>>> model = gm.fit(df)
>>> model.setPredictionCol("newPrediction")
GaussianMixture...
```
After the change, the above code will become the following:
```
>>> gm = GaussianMixture(k=3, tol=0.0001, seed=10)
>>> model = gm.fit(df)
>>> model.setPredictionCol("newPrediction")
GaussianMixtureModel...
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
### How was this patch tested?
doctest
Closes#26489 from huaxingao/spark-29876.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add multi-cols support in StopWordsRemover
### Why are the changes needed?
As a basic Transformer, StopWordsRemover should support multi-cols.
Param stopWords can be applied across all columns.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
```StopWordsRemover.setInputCols```
```StopWordsRemover.setOutputCols```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#26480 from huaxingao/spark-29808.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1,ML models should extend toString method to expose basic information.
Current some algs (GBT/RF/LoR) had done this, while others not yet.
2,add `val numFeatures` in `BisectingKMeansModel`/`GaussianMixtureModel`/`KMeansModel`/`AFTSurvivalRegressionModel`/`IsotonicRegressionModel`
### Why are the changes needed?
ML models should extend toString method to expose basic information.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsuites
Closes#26439 from zhengruifeng/models_toString.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add **Single threading model design (pinned thread model)** mode which is an experimental mode to sync threads on PVM and JVM. See https://www.py4j.org/advanced_topics.html#using-single-threading-model-pinned-thread
### Multi threading model
Currently, PySpark uses this model. Threads on PVM and JVM are independent. For instance, in a different Python thread, callbacks are received and relevant Python codes are executed. JVM threads are reused when possible.
Py4J will create a new thread every time a command is received and there is no thread available. See the current model we're using - https://www.py4j.org/advanced_topics.html#the-multi-threading-model
One problem in this model is that we can't sync threads on PVM and JVM out of the box. This leads to some problems in particular at some codes related to threading in JVM side. See:
7056e004ee/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala (L334)
Due to reusing JVM threads, seems the job groups in Python threads cannot be set in each thread as described in the JIRA.
### Single threading model design (pinned thread model)
This mode pins and syncs the threads on PVM and JVM to work around the problem above. For instance, in the same Python thread, callbacks are received and relevant Python codes are executed. See https://www.py4j.org/advanced_topics.html#the-single-threading-model
Even though this mode can sync threads on PVM and JVM for other thread related code paths,
this might cause another problem: seems unable to inherit properties as below (assuming multi-thread mode still creates new threads when existing threads are busy, I suspect this issue already exists when multiple jobs are submitted in multi-thread mode; however, it can be always seen in single threading mode):
```bash
$ PYSPARK_PIN_THREAD=true ./bin/pyspark
```
```python
import threading
spark.sparkContext.setLocalProperty("a", "hi")
def print_prop():
print(spark.sparkContext.getLocalProperty("a"))
threading.Thread(target=print_prop).start()
```
```
None
```
Unlike Scala side:
```scala
spark.sparkContext.setLocalProperty("a", "hi")
new Thread(new Runnable {
def run() = println(spark.sparkContext.getLocalProperty("a"))
}).start()
```
```
hi
```
This behaviour potentially could cause weird issues but this PR currently does not target this fix this for now since this mode is experimental.
### How does this PR fix?
Basically there are two types of Py4J servers `GatewayServer` and `ClientServer`. The former is for multi threading and the latter is for single threading. This PR adds a switch to use the latter.
In Scala side:
The logic to select a server is encapsulated in `Py4JServer` and use `Py4JServer` at `PythonRunner` for Spark summit and `PythonGatewayServer` for Spark shell. Each uses `ClientServer` when `PYSPARK_PIN_THREAD` is `true` and `GatewayServer` otherwise.
In Python side:
Simply do an if-else to switch the server to talk. It uses `ClientServer` when `PYSPARK_PIN_THREAD` is `true` and `GatewayServer` otherwise.
This is disabled by default for now.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested. This can be tested via:
```python
PYSPARK_PIN_THREAD=true ./bin/pyspark
```
and/or
```bash
cd python
./run-tests --python-executables=python --testnames "pyspark.tests.test_pin_thread"
```
Also, ran the Jenkins tests with `PYSPARK_PIN_THREAD` enabled.
Closes#24898 from HyukjinKwon/pinned-thread.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
expose expert param `aggregationDepth` in algs: GMM/GLR
### Why are the changes needed?
SVC/LoR/LiR/AFT had exposed expert param aggregationDepth to end users. It should be nice to expose it in similar algs.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, expose new param
### How was this patch tested?
added pytext tests
Closes#26322 from zhengruifeng/agg_opt.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, add shared param `relativeError`
2, `Imputer`/`RobusterScaler`/`QuantileDiscretizer` extend `HasRelativeError`
### Why are the changes needed?
It makes sense to expose RelativeError to end users, since it controls both the precision and memory overhead.
`QuantileDiscretizer` had already added this param, while other algs not yet.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, new param is added in `Imputer`/`RobusterScaler`
### How was this patch tested?
existing testsutes
Closes#26305 from zhengruifeng/add_relative_err.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add single-column input/ouput support in OneHotEncoder
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, OneHotEncoder only has multi columns support. It makes sense to support single column as well.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
```OneHotEncoder.setInputCol```
```OneHotEncoder.setOutputCol```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#26265 from huaxingao/spark-29565.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <liangchi@uber.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add single-column input/output support in Imputer
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, Imputer only has multi-column support. This PR adds single-column input/output support.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. add single-column input/output support in Imputer
```Imputer.setInputCol```
```Imputer.setOutputCol```
### How was this patch tested?
add unit tests
Closes#26247 from huaxingao/spark-29566.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove automatically generated param setters in _shared_params_code_gen.py
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep parity between scala and python
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
Add some setters in Python ML XXXModels
### How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Closes#26232 from huaxingao/spark-29093.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently pyspark doesn't write/read `avgMetrics` in `CrossValidatorModel`, whereas scala supports it.
### Why are the changes needed?
Test step to reproduce it:
```
dataset = spark.createDataFrame([(Vectors.dense([0.0]), 0.0),
(Vectors.dense([0.4]), 1.0),
(Vectors.dense([0.5]), 0.0),
(Vectors.dense([0.6]), 1.0),
(Vectors.dense([1.0]), 1.0)] * 10,
["features", "label"])
lr = LogisticRegression()
grid = ParamGridBuilder().addGrid(lr.maxIter, [0, 1]).build()
evaluator = BinaryClassificationEvaluator()
cv = CrossValidator(estimator=lr, estimatorParamMaps=grid, evaluator=evaluator,parallelism=2)
cvModel = cv.fit(dataset)
cvModel.write().save("/tmp/model")
cvModel2 = CrossValidatorModel.read().load("/tmp/model")
print(cvModel.avgMetrics) # prints non empty result as expected
print(cvModel2.avgMetrics) # Bug: prints an empty result.
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested
Before patch:
```
>>> cvModel.write().save("/tmp/model_0")
>>> cvModel2 = CrossValidatorModel.read().load("/tmp/model_0")
>>> print(cvModel2.avgMetrics)
[]
```
After patch:
```
>>> cvModel2 = CrossValidatorModel.read().load("/tmp/model_2")
>>> print(cvModel2.avgMetrics[0])
0.5
```
Closes#26038 from shahidki31/avgMetrics.
Authored-by: shahid <shahidki31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`ml.MulticlassClassificationEvaluator` & `mllib.MulticlassMetrics` support log-loss
### Why are the changes needed?
log-loss is an important classification metric and is widely used in practice
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, add new option ("logloss") and a related param `eps`
### How was this patch tested?
added testsuites & local tests refering to sklearn
Closes#26135 from zhengruifeng/logloss.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add private _XXXParams classes for classification & regression
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep parity between scala and python
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Add gettters/setters for the following Model classes
```
LinearSVCModel:
get/setRegParam
get/setMaxIte
get/setFitIntercept
get/setTol
get/setStandardization
get/setWeightCol
get/setAggregationDepth
get/setThreshold
LogisticRegressionModel:
get/setRegParam
get/setElasticNetParam
get/setMaxIter
get/setFitIntercept
get/setTol
get/setStandardization
get/setWeightCol
get/setAggregationDepth
get/setThreshold
NaiveBayesModel:
get/setWeightCol
LinearRegressionModel:
get/setRegParam
get/setElasticNetParam
get/setMaxIter
get/setTol
get/setFitIntercept
get/setStandardization
get/setWeight
get/setSolver
get/setAggregationDepth
get/setLoss
GeneralizedLinearRegressionModel:
get/setFitIntercept
get/setMaxIter
get/setTol
get/setRegParam
get/setWeightCol
get/setSolver
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add a few doctest
Closes#26142 from huaxingao/spark-29381.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
change PySpark ml ```Params._clear``` to ```Params.clear```
### Why are the changes needed?
PySpark ML currently has a private _clear() method that will unset a param. This should be made public to match the Scala API and give users a way to unset a user supplied param.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. PySpark ml ```Params._clear``` ---> ```Params.clear```
### How was this patch tested?
Add test.
Closes#26130 from huaxingao/spark-29464.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Binarizer support multi-column by extending `HasInputCols`/`HasOutputCols`/`HasThreshold`/`HasThresholds`
### Why are the changes needed?
similar algs in `ml.feature` already support multi-column, like `Bucketizer`/`StringIndexer`/`QuantileDiscretizer`
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, add setter/getter of `thresholds`/`inputCols`/`outputCols`
### How was this patch tested?
added suites
Closes#26064 from zhengruifeng/binarizer_multicols.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add _ before XXXParams classes to indicate internal usage
### Why are the changes needed?
Follow the PEP 8 convention to use _single_leading_underscore to indicate internal use
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
use existing tests
Closes#26103 from huaxingao/spark-29381.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow Scala ml tuning implementation
- put leading underscore before python ```ValidatorParams``` to indicate private
- add ```_CrossValidatorParams``` and ```_TrainValidationSplitParams```
- separate the getters and setters. Put getters in _XXXParams and setters in the Classes.
### Why are the changes needed?
Keep parity between scala and python
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
add ```CrossValidatorModel.getNumFolds``` and ```TrainValidationSplitModel.getTrainRatio()```
### How was this patch tested?
Add doctest
Closes#26057 from huaxingao/spark-tuning.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Move tree related classes to a separate file ```tree.py```
- add method ```predictLeaf``` in ```DecisionTreeModel```& ```TreeEnsembleModel```
### Why are the changes needed?
- keep parity between scala and python
- easy code maintenance
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
add method ```predictLeaf``` in ```DecisionTreeModel```& ```TreeEnsembleModel```
add ```setMinWeightFractionPerNode``` in ```DecisionTreeClassifier``` and ```DecisionTreeRegressor```
### How was this patch tested?
add some doc tests
Closes#25929 from huaxingao/spark_29116.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add getters/setters in Pyspark ALSModel.
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep parity between python and scala.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
add the following getters/setters to ALSModel
```
get/setUserCol
get/setItemCol
get/setColdStartStrategy
get/setPredictionCol
```
### How was this patch tested?
add doctest
Closes#25947 from huaxingao/spark-29269.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add column setters/getters support in Pyspark feature models
### Why are the changes needed?
keep parity between Pyspark and Scala
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
After the change, Pyspark feature models have column setters/getters support.
### How was this patch tested?
Add some doctests
Closes#25908 from huaxingao/spark-29143.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
### Why are the changes needed?
Keep parity between Scala and Python
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
add the following getters/setter to FPGrowthModel
```
getMinSupport
getNumPartitions
getMinConfidence
getItemsCol
getPredictionCol
setItemsCol
setMinConfidence
setPredictionCol
```
add following getters/setters to PrefixSpan
```
set/getMinSupport
set/getMaxPatternLength
set/getMaxLocalProjDBSize
set/getSequenceCol
```
### How was this patch tested?
add doctest
Closes#26035 from huaxingao/spark-29360.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds
```python
class _IsotonicRegressionBase(HasFeaturesCol, HasLabelCol, HasPredictionCol, HasWeightCol): ...
```
with related `Params` and uses it to replace `JavaPredictor` and `HasWeightCol` in `IsotonicRegression` base classes and `JavaPredictionModel,` in `IsotonicRegressionModel` base classes.
### Why are the changes needed?
Previous work (#25776) on [SPARK-28985](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28985) replaced `JavaEstimator`, `HasFeaturesCol`, `HasLabelCol`, `HasPredictionCol` in `IsotonicRegression` and `JavaModel` in `IsotonicRegressionModel` with newly added `JavaPredictor`:
e97b55d322/python/pyspark/ml/wrapper.py (L377)
and `JavaPredictionModel`
e97b55d322/python/pyspark/ml/wrapper.py (L405)
respectively.
This however is inconsistent with Scala counterpart where both classes extend private `IsotonicRegressionBase`
3cb1b57809/mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/IsotonicRegression.scala (L42-L43)
This preserves some of the existing inconsistencies (`model` as defined in [the official example](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/examples/src/main/python/ml/isotonic_regression_example.py)), i.e.
```python
from pyspark.ml.regression impor IsotonicRegressionMode
from pyspark.ml.param.shared import HasWeightCol
issubclass(IsotonicRegressionModel, HasWeightCol)
# False
hasattr(model, "weightCol")
# True
```
as well as introduces a bug, by adding unsupported `predict` method:
```python
import inspect
hasattr(model, "predict")
# True
inspect.getfullargspec(IsotonicRegressionModel.predict)
# FullArgSpec(args=['self', 'value'], varargs=None, varkw=None, defaults=None, kwonlyargs=[], kwonlydefaults=None, annotations={})
IsotonicRegressionModel.predict.__doc__
# Predict label for the given features.\n\n .. versionadded:: 3.0.0'
model.predict(dataset.first().features)
# Py4JError: An error occurred while calling o49.predict. Trace:
# py4j.Py4JException: Method predict([class org.apache.spark.ml.linalg.SparseVector]) does not exist
# ...
```
Furthermore existing implementation can cause further problems in the future, if `Predictor` / `PredictionModel` API changes.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. It:
- Removes invalid `IsotonicRegressionModel.predict` method.
- Adds `HasWeightColumn` to `IsotonicRegressionModel`.
however the faulty implementation hasn't been released yet, and proposed additions have negligible potential for breaking existing code (and none, compared to changes already made in #25776).
### How was this patch tested?
- Existing unit tests.
- Manual testing.
CC huaxingao, zhengruifeng
Closes#26023 from zero323/SPARK-28985-FOLLOW-UP-isotonic-regression.
Authored-by: zero323 <mszymkiewicz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds
```python
_AFTSurvivalRegressionParams(HasFeaturesCol, HasLabelCol, HasPredictionCol,
HasMaxIter, HasTol, HasFitIntercept,
HasAggregationDepth): ...
```
with related Params and uses it to replace `HasFitIntercept`, `HasMaxIter`, `HasTol` and `HasAggregationDepth` in `AFTSurvivalRegression` base classes and `JavaPredictionModel,` in `AFTSurvivalRegressionModel` base classes.
### Why are the changes needed?
Previous work (#25776) on [SPARK-28985](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28985) replaced `JavaEstimator`, `HasFeaturesCol`, `HasLabelCol`, `HasPredictionCol` in `AFTSurvivalRegression` and `JavaModel` in `AFTSurvivalRegressionModel` with newly added `JavaPredictor`:
e97b55d322/python/pyspark/ml/wrapper.py (L377)
and `JavaPredictionModel`
e97b55d322/python/pyspark/ml/wrapper.py (L405)
respectively.
This however is inconsistent with Scala counterpart where both classes extend private `AFTSurvivalRegressionBase`
eb037a8180/mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegression.scala (L48-L50)
This preserves some of the existing inconsistencies (variables as defined in [the official example](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/examples/src/main/python/ml/aft_survival_regression.p))
```
from pyspark.ml.regression import AFTSurvivalRegression, AFTSurvivalRegressionModel
from pyspark.ml.param.shared import HasMaxIter, HasTol, HasFitIntercept, HasAggregationDepth
from pyspark.ml.param import Param
issubclass(AFTSurvivalRegressionModel, HasMaxIter)
# False
hasattr(model, "maxIter") and isinstance(model.maxIter, Param)
# True
issubclass(AFTSurvivalRegressionModel, HasTol)
# False
hasattr(model, "tol") and isinstance(model.tol, Param)
# True
```
and can cause problems in the future, if Predictor / PredictionModel API changes (unlike [`IsotonicRegression`](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26023), current implementation is technically speaking correct, though incomplete).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, it adds a number of base classes to `AFTSurvivalRegressionModel`. These change purely additive and have negligible potential for breaking existing code (and none, compared to changes already made in #25776). Additionally affected API hasn't been released in the current form yet.
### How was this patch tested?
- Existing unit tests.
- Manual testing.
CC huaxingao, zhengruifeng
Closes#26024 from zero323/SPARK-28985-FOLLOW-UP-aftsurival-regression.
Authored-by: zero323 <mszymkiewicz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR replaces some references with correct ones (`:py:class:`).
### Why are the changes needed?
Newly added mixins from the original PR incorrectly reference classes with `:py:attr:`. While these classes are marked as internal, and not rendered in the standard documentation, it still makes sense to use correct roles.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. The changed part is not a part of generated PySpark documents.
### How was this patch tested?
Since this PR is a kind of typo fix, manually checking the patch.
We can build document for compilation test although there is no UI change.
Closes#26004 from zero323/SPARK-29142-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: zero323 <mszymkiewicz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, expose `BinaryClassificationMetrics.numBins` in `BinaryClassificationEvaluator`
2, expose `RegressionMetrics.throughOrigin` in `RegressionEvaluator`
3, add metric `explainedVariance` in `RegressionEvaluator`
### Why are the changes needed?
existing function in mllib.metrics should also be exposed in ml
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, this PR add two expert params and one metric option
### How was this patch tested?
existing and added tests
Closes#25940 from zhengruifeng/evaluator_add_param.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add some common classes in Python to make it have the same structure as Scala
1. Scala has ClassifierParams/Classifier/ClassificationModel:
```
trait ClassifierParams
extends PredictorParams with HasRawPredictionCol
abstract class Classifier
extends Predictor with ClassifierParams {
def setRawPredictionCol
}
abstract class ClassificationModel
extends PredictionModel with ClassifierParams {
def setRawPredictionCol
}
```
This PR makes Python has the following:
```
class JavaClassifierParams(HasRawPredictionCol, JavaPredictorParams):
pass
class JavaClassifier(JavaPredictor, JavaClassifierParams):
def setRawPredictionCol
class JavaClassificationModel(JavaPredictionModel, JavaClassifierParams):
def setRawPredictionCol
```
2. Scala has ProbabilisticClassifierParams/ProbabilisticClassifier/ProbabilisticClassificationModel:
```
trait ProbabilisticClassifierParams
extends ClassifierParams with HasProbabilityCol with HasThresholds
abstract class ProbabilisticClassifier
extends Classifier with ProbabilisticClassifierParams {
def setProbabilityCol
def setThresholds
}
abstract class ProbabilisticClassificationModel
extends ClassificationModel with ProbabilisticClassifierParams {
def setProbabilityCol
def setThresholds
}
```
This PR makes Python have the following:
```
class JavaProbabilisticClassifierParams(HasProbabilityCol, HasThresholds, JavaClassifierParams):
pass
class JavaProbabilisticClassifier(JavaClassifier, JavaProbabilisticClassifierParams):
def setProbabilityCol
def setThresholds
class JavaProbabilisticClassificationModel(JavaClassificationModel, JavaProbabilisticClassifierParams):
def setProbabilityCol
def setThresholds
```
3. Scala has PredictorParams/Predictor/PredictionModel:
```
trait PredictorParams extends Params
with HasLabelCol with HasFeaturesCol with HasPredictionCol
abstract class Predictor
extends Estimator with PredictorParams {
def setLabelCol
def setFeaturesCol
def setPredictionCol
}
abstract class PredictionModel
extends Model with PredictorParams {
def setFeaturesCol
def setPredictionCol
def numFeatures
def predict
}
```
This PR makes Python have the following:
```
class JavaPredictorParams(HasLabelCol, HasFeaturesCol, HasPredictionCol):
pass
class JavaPredictor(JavaEstimator, JavaPredictorParams):
def setLabelCol
def setFeaturesCol
def setPredictionCol
class JavaPredictionModel(JavaModel, JavaPredictorParams):
def setFeaturesCol
def setPredictionCol
def numFeatures
def predict
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Have parity between Python and Scala ML
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Add the following changes:
```
LinearSVCModel
- get/setFeatureCol
- get/setPredictionCol
- get/setLabelCol
- get/setRawPredictionCol
- predict
```
```
LogisticRegressionModel
DecisionTreeClassificationModel
RandomForestClassificationModel
GBTClassificationModel
NaiveBayesModel
MultilayerPerceptronClassificationModel
- get/setFeatureCol
- get/setPredictionCol
- get/setLabelCol
- get/setRawPredictionCol
- get/setProbabilityCol
- predict
```
```
LinearRegressionModel
IsotonicRegressionModel
DecisionTreeRegressionModel
RandomForestRegressionModel
GBTRegressionModel
AFTSurvivalRegressionModel
GeneralizedLinearRegressionModel
- get/setFeatureCol
- get/setPredictionCol
- get/setLabelCol
- predict
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add a few doc tests.
Closes#25776 from huaxingao/spark-28985.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add multiple columns support to PySpark QuantileDiscretizer
### Why are the changes needed?
Multiple columns support for QuantileDiscretizer was in scala side a while ago. We need to add multiple columns support to python too.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. New Python is added
### How was this patch tested?
Add doctest
Closes#25812 from huaxingao/spark-22796.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <liangchi@uber.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fitting ALS model can be failed due to nondeterministic input data. Currently the failure is thrown by an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException which is not explainable for end users what is wrong in fitting.
This patch catches this exception and rethrows a more explainable one, when the input data is nondeterministic.
Because we may not exactly know the output deterministic level of RDDs produced by user code, this patch also adds a note to Scala/Python/R ALS document about the training data deterministic level.
### Why are the changes needed?
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException was observed during fitting ALS model. It was caused by mismatching between in/out user/item blocks during computing ratings.
If the training RDD output is nondeterministic, when fetch failure is happened, rerun part of training RDD can produce inconsistent user/item blocks.
This patch is needed to notify users ALS fitting on nondeterministic input.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. When fitting ALS model on nondeterministic input data, previously if rerun happens, users would see ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException caused by mismatch between In/Out user/item blocks.
After this patch, a SparkException with more clear message will be thrown, and original ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is wrapped.
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on development cluster.
Closes#25789 from viirya/als-indeterminate-input.
Lead-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <liangchi@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bucketizer support multi-column in the python side
### Why are the changes needed?
Bucketizer should support multi-column like the scala side.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, this PR add new Python API
### How was this patch tested?
added testsuites
Closes#25801 from zhengruifeng/20542_py.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow the scala ```OneVsRestParams``` implementation, move ```setClassifier``` from ```OneVsRestParams``` to ```OneVsRest``` in Pyspark
### Why are the changes needed?
1. Maintain the parity between scala and python code.
2. ```Classifier``` can only be set in the estimator.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
Previous behavior: ```OneVsRestModel``` has method ```setClassifier```
Current behavior: ```setClassifier``` is removed from ```OneVsRestModel```. ```classifier``` can only be set in ```OneVsRest```.
### How was this patch tested?
Use existing tests
Closes#25715 from huaxingao/spark-28969.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Remove SQLContext.createExternalTable and Catalog.createExternalTable, deprecated in favor of createTable since 2.2.0, plus tests of deprecated methods
- Remove HiveContext, deprecated in 2.0.0, in favor of `SparkSession.builder.enableHiveSupport`
- Remove deprecated KinesisUtils.createStream methods, plus tests of deprecated methods, deprecate in 2.2.0
- Remove deprecated MLlib (not Spark ML) linear method support, mostly utility constructors and 'train' methods, and associated docs. This includes methods in LinearRegression, LogisticRegression, Lasso, RidgeRegression. These have been deprecated since 2.0.0
- Remove deprecated Pyspark MLlib linear method support, including LogisticRegressionWithSGD, LinearRegressionWithSGD, LassoWithSGD
- Remove 'runs' argument in KMeans.train() method, which has been a no-op since 2.0.0
- Remove deprecated ChiSqSelector isSorted protected method
- Remove deprecated 'yarn-cluster' and 'yarn-client' master argument in favor of 'yarn' and deploy mode 'cluster', etc
Notes:
- I was not able to remove deprecated DataFrameReader.json(RDD) in favor of DataFrameReader.json(Dataset); the former was deprecated in 2.2.0, but, it is still needed to support Pyspark's .json() method, which can't use a Dataset.
- Looks like SQLContext.createExternalTable was not actually deprecated in Pyspark, but, almost certainly was meant to be? Catalog.createExternalTable was.
- I afterwards noted that the toDegrees, toRadians functions were almost removed fully in SPARK-25908, but Felix suggested keeping just the R version as they hadn't been technically deprecated. I'd like to revisit that. Do we really want the inconsistency? I'm not against reverting it again, but then that implies leaving SQLContext.createExternalTable just in Pyspark too, which seems weird.
- I *kept* LogisticRegressionWithSGD, LinearRegressionWithSGD, LassoWithSGD, RidgeRegressionWithSGD in Pyspark, though deprecated, as it is hard to remove them (still used by StreamingLogisticRegressionWithSGD?) and they are not fully removed in Scala. Maybe should not have been deprecated.
### Why are the changes needed?
Deprecated items are easiest to remove in a major release, so we should do so as much as possible for Spark 3. This does not target items deprecated 'recently' as of Spark 2.3, which is still 18 months old.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, in that deprecated items are removed from some public APIs.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#25684 from srowen/SPARK-28980.
Lead-authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add HasNumFeatures in the scala side, with `1<<18` as the default value
### Why are the changes needed?
HasNumFeatures is already added in the py side, it is reasonable to keep them in sync.
I don't find other similar place.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing testsuites
Closes#25671 from zhengruifeng/add_HasNumFeatures.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The Experimental and Evolving annotations are both (like Unstable) used to express that a an API may change. However there are many things in the code that have been marked that way since even Spark 1.x. Per the dev thread, anything introduced at or before Spark 2.3.0 is pretty much 'stable' in that it would not change without a deprecation cycle. Therefore I'd like to remove most of these annotations. And, remove the `:: Experimental ::` scaladoc tag too. And likewise for Python, R.
The changes below can be summarized as:
- Generally, anything introduced at or before Spark 2.3.0 has been unmarked as neither Evolving nor Experimental
- Obviously experimental items like DSv2, Barrier mode, ExperimentalMethods are untouched
- I _did_ unmark a few MLlib classes introduced in 2.4, as I am quite confident they're not going to change (e.g. KolmogorovSmirnovTest, PowerIterationClustering)
It's a big change to review, so I'd suggest scanning the list of _files_ changed to see if any area seems like it should remain partly experimental and examine those.
### Why are the changes needed?
Many of these annotations are incorrect; the APIs are de facto stable. Leaving them also makes legitimate usages of the annotations less meaningful.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#25558 from srowen/SPARK-28855.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
expose the newly added tree-based transformation in the py side
### Why are the changes needed?
function parity
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, add `setLeafCol` & `getLeafCol` in the py side
### How was this patch tested?
added tests & local tests
Closes#25566 from zhengruifeng/py_tree_path.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
<!--
Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review.
-->
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkML writer gets hadoop conf from session state, instead of the spark context.
<!--
Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes.
3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
-->
### Why are the changes needed?
Allow for multiple sessions in the same context that have different hadoop configurations.
<!--
Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
-->
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
<!--
If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible.
If no, write 'No'.
-->
No
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add.
-->
Tested in pyspark.ml.tests.test_persistence.PersistenceTest test_default_read_write
Closes#25505 from helenyugithub/SPARK-28776.
Authored-by: heleny <heleny@palantir.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
<!--
Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review.
-->
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
<!--
Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes.
3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
-->
This PR proposes to fix both tests below:
```
======================================================================
FAIL: test_raw_and_probability_prediction (pyspark.ml.tests.test_algorithms.MultilayerPerceptronClassifierTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/dongjoon/APACHE/spark-master/python/pyspark/ml/tests/test_algorithms.py", line 89, in test_raw_and_probability_prediction
self.assertTrue(np.allclose(result.rawPrediction, expected_rawPrediction, atol=1E-4))
AssertionError: False is not true
```
```
File "/Users/dongjoon/APACHE/spark-master/python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py", line 386, in __main__.GaussianMixtureModel
Failed example:
abs(softPredicted[0] - 1.0) < 0.001
Expected:
True
Got:
False
**********************************************************************
File "/Users/dongjoon/APACHE/spark-master/python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py", line 388, in __main__.GaussianMixtureModel
Failed example:
abs(softPredicted[1] - 0.0) < 0.001
Expected:
True
Got:
False
```
to pass in JDK 11.
The root cause seems to be different float values being understood via Py4J. This issue also was found in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25132 before.
When floats are transferred from Python to JVM, the values are sent as are. Python floats are not "precise" due to its own limitation - https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/floatingpoint.html.
For some reasons, the floats from Python on JDK 8 and JDK 11 are different, which is already explicitly not guaranteed.
This seems why only some tests in PySpark with floats are being failed.
So, this PR fixes it by increasing tolerance in identified test cases in PySpark.
### Why are the changes needed?
<!--
Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
-->
To fully support JDK 11. See, for instance, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25443 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25423 for ongoing efforts.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
<!--
If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible.
If no, write 'No'.
-->
No.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add.
-->
Manually tested as described in JIRAs:
```
$ build/sbt -Phadoop-3.2 test:package
$ python/run-tests --testnames 'pyspark.ml.tests.test_algorithms' --python-executables python
```
```
$ build/sbt -Phadoop-3.2 test:package
$ python/run-tests --testnames 'pyspark.mllib.clustering' --python-executables python
```
Closes#25475 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-28735.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Leave ```shared.py``` untouched. Move Python ```DecisionTreeParams``` to ```regression.py```
## How was this patch tested?
Use existing tests
Closes#25406 from huaxingao/spark-28243.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update HashingTF to use new implementation of MurmurHash3
Make HashingTF use the old MurmurHash3 when a model from pre 3.0 is loaded
## How was this patch tested?
Change existing unit tests. Also add one unit test to make sure HashingTF use the old MurmurHash3 when a model from pre 3.0 is loaded
Closes#25303 from huaxingao/spark-23469.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I remove the deprecate `ImageSchema.readImages`.
Move some useful methods from class `ImageSchema` into class `ImageFileFormat`.
In pyspark, I rename `ImageSchema` class to be `ImageUtils`, and keep some useful python methods in it.
## How was this patch tested?
UT.
Please review https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#25245 from WeichenXu123/remove_image_schema.
Authored-by: WeichenXu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implement `RobustScaler`
Since the transformation is quite similar to `StandardScaler`, I refactor the transform function so that it can be reused in both scalers.
## How was this patch tested?
existing and added tests
Closes#25160 from zhengruifeng/robust_scaler.
Authored-by: zhengruifeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add indexOf method for ml.feature.HashingTF.
## How was this patch tested?
Add Unit test.
Closes#25250 from huaxingao/spark-21481.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
remove deprecated ``` def context(self, sqlContext)``` from ```pyspark/ml/util.py```
## How was this patch tested?
test with existing ml PySpark test suites
Closes#25246 from huaxingao/spark-28507.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
