## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix SparkR ```spark.naiveBayes``` error when response variable of dataset is numeric type.
See details and how to reproduce this bug at [SPARK-15153](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15153).
## How was this patch tested?
Add unit test.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15431 from yanboliang/spark-15153-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```RFormula``` will index label only when it is string type currently. If the label is numeric type and we use ```RFormula``` to present a classification model, there is no label attributes in label column metadata. The label attributes are useful when making prediction for classification, so we can force to index label by ```StringIndexer``` whether it is numeric or string type for classification. Then SparkR wrappers can extract label attributes from label column metadata successfully. This feature can help us to fix bug similar with [SPARK-15153](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15153).
For regression, we will still to keep label as numeric type.
In this PR, we add a param ```indexLabel``` to control whether to force to index label for ```RFormula```.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#13675 from yanboliang/spark-15957.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A nonsensical split is produced from method `findSplitsForContinuousFeature` for decision trees. This PR removes the superfluous split and updates unit tests accordingly. Additionally, an assertion to check that the number of found splits is `> 0` is removed, and instead features with zero possible splits are ignored.
## How was this patch tested?
A unit test was added to check that finding splits for a constant feature produces an empty array.
Author: sethah <seth.hendrickson16@gmail.com>
Closes#12374 from sethah/SPARK-14610.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
While adding R wrapper for LogisticRegression, I found one extra comment. It is minor and I just remove it.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Author: wm624@hotmail.com <wm624@hotmail.com>
Closes#15391 from wangmiao1981/mlordoc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In practice we cannot guarantee that an `InternalRow` is immutable. This makes the `MutableRow` almost redundant. This PR folds `MutableRow` into `InternalRow`.
The code below illustrates the immutability issue with InternalRow:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.InternalRow
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericMutableRow
val struct = new GenericMutableRow(1)
val row = InternalRow(struct, 1)
println(row)
scala> [[null], 1]
struct.setInt(0, 42)
println(row)
scala> [[42], 1]
```
This might be somewhat controversial, so feedback is appreciated.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#15333 from hvanhovell/SPARK-17761.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before, we computed `instances` in LinearRegression in two spots, even though they did the same thing. One of them did not cast the label column to `DoubleType`. This patch consolidates the computation and always casts the label column to `DoubleType`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test to check all solvers. This test failed before this patch.
Author: sethah <seth.hendrickson16@gmail.com>
Closes#15364 from sethah/linreg_numeric_type.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid 2D array flatten in ```NaiveBayes``` training, since flatten method might be expensive (It will create another array and copy data there).
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15359 from yanboliang/nb-theta.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1,parity check and add missing test suites for ml's NB
2,remove some unused imports
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests in spark-shell
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#15312 from zhengruifeng/nb_test_parity.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When use PeriodicGraphCheckpointer to persist graph, sometimes the edges isn't persisted. As currently only when vertices's storage level is none, graph is persisted. However there is a chance vertices's storage level is not none while edges's is none. Eg. graph created by a outerJoinVertices operation, vertices is automatically cached while edges is not. In this way, edges will not be persisted if we use PeriodicGraphCheckpointer do persist. We need separately check edges's storage level and persisted it if it's none.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Author: ding <ding@localhost.localdomain>
Closes#15124 from dding3/spark-persisitEdge.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Partial revert of #15277 to instead sort and store input to model rather than require sorted input
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#15299 from srowen/SPARK-17704.2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Revert change for NB Model's Load to maintain compatibility with the model stored before 2.0
## How was this patch tested?
local build
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#15313 from zhengruifeng/revert_save_load.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1,support weighted data
2,use dataset/dataframe instead of rdd
3,make mllib as a wrapper to call ml
## How was this patch tested?
local manual tests in spark-shell
unit tests
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#12819 from zhengruifeng/weighted_nb.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In calling LogisticRegression.evaluate and GeneralizedLinearRegression.evaluate using a Dataset where the Label is not of a double type, calculations pattern match against a double and throw a MatchError. This fix casts the Label column to a DoubleType to ensure there is no MatchError.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests to call evaluate with a dataset that has Label as other numeric types.
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#15288 from BryanCutler/binaryLOR-numericCheck-SPARK-17697.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* changes the implementation of gemv with transposed SparseMatrix and SparseVector both in mllib-local and mllib (identical)
* adds a test that was failing before this change, but succeeds with these changes.
The problem in the previous implementation was that it only increments `i`, that is enumerating the columns of a row in the SparseMatrix, when the row-index of the vector matches the column-index of the SparseMatrix. In cases where a particular row of the SparseMatrix has non-zero values at column-indices lower than corresponding non-zero row-indices of the SparseVector, the non-zero values of the SparseVector are enumerated without ever matching the column-index at index `i` and the remaining column-indices i+1,...,indEnd-1 are never attempted. The test cases in this PR illustrate this issue.
## How was this patch tested?
I have run the specific `gemv` tests in both mllib-local and mllib. I am currently still running `./dev/run-tests`.
## ___
As per instructions, I hereby state that this is my original work and that I license the work to the project (Apache Spark) under the project's open source license.
Mentioning dbtsai, viirya and brkyvz whom I can see have worked/authored on these parts before.
Author: Bjarne Fruergaard <bwahlgreen@gmail.com>
Closes#15296 from bwahlgreen/bugfix-spark-17721.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Several performance improvement for ```ChiSqSelector```:
1, Keep ```selectedFeatures``` ordered ascendent.
```ChiSqSelectorModel.transform``` need ```selectedFeatures``` ordered to make prediction. We should sort it when training model rather than making prediction, since users usually train model once and use the model to do prediction multiple times.
2, When training ```fpr``` type ```ChiSqSelectorModel```, it's not necessary to sort the ChiSq test result by statistic.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15277 from yanboliang/spark-17704.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#14035 added ```testImplicits``` to ML unit tests and promoted ```toDF()```, but left one minor issue at ```VectorIndexerSuite```. If we create the DataFrame by ```Seq(...).toDF()```, it will throw different error/exception compared with ```sc.parallelize(Seq(...)).toDF()``` for one of the test cases.
After in-depth study, I found it was caused by different behavior of local and distributed Dataset if the UDF failed at ```assert```. If the data is local Dataset, it throws ```AssertionError``` directly; If the data is distributed Dataset, it throws ```SparkException``` which is the wrapper of ```AssertionError```. I think we should enforce this test to cover both case.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15261 from yanboliang/spark-16356.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch addresses a potential cause of resource leaks in data source file scans. As reported in [SPARK-17666](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17666), tasks which do not fully-consume their input may cause file handles / network connections (e.g. S3 connections) to be leaked. Spark's `NewHadoopRDD` uses a TaskContext callback to [close its record readers](https://github.com/apache/spark/blame/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/NewHadoopRDD.scala#L208), but the new data source file scans will only close record readers once their iterators are fully-consumed.
This patch modifies `RecordReaderIterator` and `HadoopFileLinesReader` to add `close()` methods and modifies all six implementations of `FileFormat.buildReader()` to register TaskContext task completion callbacks to guarantee that cleanup is eventually performed.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested manually for now.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#15245 from JoshRosen/SPARK-17666-close-recordreader.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR introduces more compact representation for ```UnsafeArrayData```.
```UnsafeArrayData``` needs to accept ```null``` value in each entry of an array. In the current version, it has three parts
```
[numElements] [offsets] [values]
```
`Offsets` has the number of `numElements`, and represents `null` if its value is negative. It may increase memory footprint, and introduces an indirection for accessing each of `values`.
This PR uses bitvectors to represent nullability for each element like `UnsafeRow`, and eliminates an indirection for accessing each element. The new ```UnsafeArrayData``` has four parts.
```
[numElements][null bits][values or offset&length][variable length portion]
```
In the `null bits` region, we store 1 bit per element, represents whether an element is null. Its total size is ceil(numElements / 8) bytes, and it is aligned to 8-byte boundaries.
In the `values or offset&length` region, we store the content of elements. For fields that hold fixed-length primitive types, such as long, double, or int, we store the value directly in the field. For fields with non-primitive or variable-length values, we store a relative offset (w.r.t. the base address of the array) that points to the beginning of the variable-length field and length (they are combined into a long). Each is word-aligned. For `variable length portion`, each is aligned to 8-byte boundaries.
The new format can reduce memory footprint and improve performance of accessing each element. An example of memory foot comparison:
1024x1024 elements integer array
Size of ```baseObject``` for ```UnsafeArrayData```: 8 + 1024x1024 + 1024x1024 = 2M bytes
Size of ```baseObject``` for ```UnsafeArrayData```: 8 + 1024x1024/8 + 1024x1024 = 1.25M bytes
In summary, we got 1.0-2.6x performance improvements over the code before applying this PR.
Here are performance results of [benchmark programs](04d2e4b6db/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/UnsafeArrayDataBenchmark.scala):
**Read UnsafeArrayData**: 1.7x and 1.6x performance improvements over the code before applying this PR
````
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_91-b14 on Linux 4.4.11-200.fc22.x86_64
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge)
Without SPARK-15962
Read UnsafeArrayData: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Int 430 / 436 390.0 2.6 1.0X
Double 456 / 485 367.8 2.7 0.9X
With SPARK-15962
Read UnsafeArrayData: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Int 252 / 260 666.1 1.5 1.0X
Double 281 / 292 597.7 1.7 0.9X
````
**Write UnsafeArrayData**: 1.0x and 1.1x performance improvements over the code before applying this PR
````
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_91-b14 on Linux 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge)
Without SPARK-15962
Write UnsafeArrayData: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Int 203 / 273 103.4 9.7 1.0X
Double 239 / 356 87.9 11.4 0.8X
With SPARK-15962
Write UnsafeArrayData: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Int 196 / 249 107.0 9.3 1.0X
Double 227 / 367 92.3 10.8 0.9X
````
**Get primitive array from UnsafeArrayData**: 2.6x and 1.6x performance improvements over the code before applying this PR
````
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_91-b14 on Linux 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge)
Without SPARK-15962
Get primitive array from UnsafeArrayData: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Int 207 / 217 304.2 3.3 1.0X
Double 257 / 363 245.2 4.1 0.8X
With SPARK-15962
Get primitive array from UnsafeArrayData: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Int 151 / 198 415.8 2.4 1.0X
Double 214 / 394 293.6 3.4 0.7X
````
**Create UnsafeArrayData from primitive array**: 1.7x and 2.1x performance improvements over the code before applying this PR
````
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_91-b14 on Linux 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge)
Without SPARK-15962
Create UnsafeArrayData from primitive array: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Int 340 / 385 185.1 5.4 1.0X
Double 479 / 705 131.3 7.6 0.7X
With SPARK-15962
Create UnsafeArrayData from primitive array: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Int 206 / 211 306.0 3.3 1.0X
Double 232 / 406 271.6 3.7 0.9X
````
1.7x and 1.4x performance improvements in [```UDTSerializationBenchmark```](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/UDTSerializationBenchmark.scala) over the code before applying this PR
````
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_91-b14 on Linux 4.4.11-200.fc22.x86_64
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge)
Without SPARK-15962
VectorUDT de/serialization: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
serialize 442 / 533 0.0 441927.1 1.0X
deserialize 217 / 274 0.0 217087.6 2.0X
With SPARK-15962
VectorUDT de/serialization: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
serialize 265 / 318 0.0 265138.5 1.0X
deserialize 155 / 197 0.0 154611.4 1.7X
````
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests into ```UnsafeArraySuite```
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#13680 from kiszk/SPARK-15962.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This was suggested in 101663f1ae (commitcomment-17114968).
This PR adds `testImplicits` to `MLlibTestSparkContext` so that some implicits such as `toDF()` can be sued across ml tests.
This PR also changes all the usages of `spark.createDataFrame( ... )` to `toDF()` where applicable in ml tests in Scala.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should work.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#14035 from HyukjinKwon/minor-ml-test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#14597 modified ```ChiSqSelector``` to support ```fpr``` type selector, however, it left some issue need to be addressed:
* We should allow users to set selector type explicitly rather than switching them by using different setting function, since the setting order will involves some unexpected issue. For example, if users both set ```numTopFeatures``` and ```percentile```, it will train ```kbest``` or ```percentile``` model based on the order of setting (the latter setting one will be trained). This make users confused, and we should allow users to set selector type explicitly. We handle similar issues at other place of ML code base such as ```GeneralizedLinearRegression``` and ```LogisticRegression```.
* Meanwhile, if there are more than one parameter except ```alpha``` can be set for ```fpr``` model, we can not handle it elegantly in the existing framework. And similar issues for ```kbest``` and ```percentile``` model. Setting selector type explicitly can solve this issue also.
* If setting selector type explicitly by users is allowed, we should handle param interaction such as if users set ```selectorType = percentile``` and ```alpha = 0.1```, we should notify users the parameter ```alpha``` will take no effect. We should handle complex parameter interaction checks at ```transformSchema```. (FYI #11620)
* We should use lower case of the selector type names to follow MLlib convention.
* Add ML Python API.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15214 from yanboliang/spark-17017.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Match ProbabilisticClassifer.thresholds requirements to R randomForest cutoff, requiring all > 0
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests plus new test cases
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#15149 from srowen/SPARK-17057.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To match Tokenizer and for compatibility with Word2Vec, output a nullable string array type in NGram
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#15179 from srowen/SPARK-10835.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
update `MultilayerPerceptronClassifierWrapper.fit` paramter type:
`layers: Array[Int]`
`seed: String`
update several default params in sparkR `spark.mlp`:
`tol` --> 1e-6
`stepSize` --> 0.03
`seed` --> NULL ( when seed == NULL, the scala-side wrapper regard it as a `null` value and the seed will use the default one )
r-side `seed` only support 32bit integer.
remove `layers` default value, and move it in front of those parameters with default value.
add `layers` parameter validation check.
## How was this patch tested?
tests added.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#15051 from WeichenXu123/update_py_mlp_default.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
RandomForest currently sends the entire forest to each worker on each iteration. This is because (a) the node queue is FIFO and (b) the closure references the entire array of trees (topNodes). (a) causes RFs to handle splits in many trees, especially early on in learning. (b) sends all trees explicitly.
This PR:
(a) Change the RF node queue to be FILO (a stack), so that RFs tend to focus on 1 or a few trees before focusing on others.
(b) Change topNodes to pass only the trees required on that iteration.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests:
* Existing tests for correctness of tree learning
* Manually modifying code and running tests to verify that a small number of trees are communicated on each iteration
* This last item is hard to test via unit tests given the current APIs.
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#14359 from jkbradley/rfs-fewer-trees.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow Spark 2.x to load instances of LDA, LocalLDAModel, and DistributedLDAModel saved from Spark 1.6.
## How was this patch tested?
I tested this manually, saving the 3 types from 1.6 and loading them into master (2.x). In the future, we can add generic tests for testing backwards compatibility across all ML models in SPARK-15573.
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#15034 from jkbradley/lda-backwards.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add treeAggregateDepth parameter for AFTSurvivalRegression to keep consistent with LiR/LoR.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#14851 from WeichenXu123/add_treeAggregate_param_for_survival_regression.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update error handling for Cholesky decomposition to provide a little more info when input is singular.
## How was this patch tested?
New test case; jenkins tests.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#15177 from srowen/SPARK-11918.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an issue when Bucketizer is called to handle a dataset containing NaN value.
Sometimes, null value might also be useful to users, so in these cases, Bucketizer should
reserve one extra bucket for NaN values, instead of throwing an illegal exception.
Before:
```
Bucketizer.transform on NaN value threw an illegal exception.
```
After:
```
NaN values will be grouped in an extra bucket.
```
## How was this patch tested?
New test cases added in `BucketizerSuite`.
Signed-off-by: VinceShieh <vincent.xieintel.com>
Author: VinceShieh <vincent.xie@intel.com>
Closes#14858 from VinceShieh/spark-17219.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Univariate feature selection works by selecting the best features based on univariate statistical tests. False Positive Rate (FPR) is a popular univariate statistical test for feature selection. We add a chiSquare Selector based on False Positive Rate (FPR) test in this PR, like it is implemented in scikit-learn.
http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/feature_selection.html#univariate-feature-selection
## How was this patch tested?
Add Scala ut
Author: Peng, Meng <peng.meng@intel.com>
Closes#14597 from mpjlu/fprChiSquare.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The code in `Word2VecModel.findSynonyms` to choose the vocabulary elements with the highest similarity to the query vector currently sorts the collection of similarities for every vocabulary element. This involves making multiple copies of the collection of similarities while doing a (relatively) expensive sort. It would be more efficient to find the best matches by maintaining a bounded priority queue and populating it with a single pass over the vocabulary, and that is exactly what this patch does.
## How was this patch tested?
This patch adds no user-visible functionality and its correctness should be exercised by existing tests. To ensure that this approach is actually faster, I made a microbenchmark for `findSynonyms`:
```
object W2VTiming {
import org.apache.spark.{SparkContext, SparkConf}
import org.apache.spark.mllib.feature.Word2VecModel
def run(modelPath: String, scOpt: Option[SparkContext] = None) {
val sc = scOpt.getOrElse(new SparkContext(new SparkConf(true).setMaster("local[*]").setAppName("test")))
val model = Word2VecModel.load(sc, modelPath)
val keys = model.getVectors.keys
val start = System.currentTimeMillis
for(key <- keys) {
model.findSynonyms(key, 5)
model.findSynonyms(key, 10)
model.findSynonyms(key, 25)
model.findSynonyms(key, 50)
}
val finish = System.currentTimeMillis
println("run completed in " + (finish - start) + "ms")
}
}
```
I ran this test on a model generated from the complete works of Jane Austen and found that the new approach was over 3x faster than the old approach. (If the `num` argument to `findSynonyms` is very close to the vocabulary size, the new approach will have less of an advantage over the old one.)
Author: William Benton <willb@redhat.com>
Closes#15150 from willb/SPARK-17595.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Merge `MultinomialLogisticRegression` into `LogisticRegression` and remove `MultinomialLogisticRegression`.
Marked as WIP because we should discuss the coefficients API in the model. See discussion below.
JIRA: [SPARK-17163](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17163)
## How was this patch tested?
Merged test suites and added some new unit tests.
## Design
### Switching between binomial and multinomial
We default to automatically detecting whether we should run binomial or multinomial lor. We expose a new parameter called `family` which defaults to auto. When "auto" is used, we run normal binomial lor with pivoting if there are 1 or 2 label classes. Otherwise, we run multinomial. If the user explicitly sets the family, then we abide by that setting. In the case where "binomial" is set but multiclass lor is detected, we throw an error.
### coefficients/intercept model API (TODO)
This is the biggest design point remaining, IMO. We need to decide how to store the coefficients and intercepts in the model, and in turn how to expose them via the API. Two important points:
* We must maintain compatibility with the old API, i.e. we must expose `def coefficients: Vector` and `def intercept: Double`
* There are two separate cases: binomial lr where we have a single set of coefficients and a single intercept and multinomial lr where we have `numClasses` sets of coefficients and `numClasses` intercepts.
Some options:
1. **Store the binomial coefficients as a `2 x numFeatures` matrix.** This means that we would center the model coefficients before storing them in the model. The BLOR algorithm gives `1 * numFeatures` coefficients, but we would convert them to `2 x numFeatures` coefficients before storing them, effectively doubling the storage in the model. This has the advantage that we can make the code cleaner (i.e. less `if (isMultinomial) ... else ...`) and we don't have to reason about the different cases as much. It has the disadvantage that we double the storage space and we could see small regressions at prediction time since there are 2x the number of operations in the prediction algorithms. Additionally, we still have to produce the uncentered coefficients/intercept via the API, so we will have to either ALSO store the uncentered version, or compute it in `def coefficients: Vector` every time.
2. **Store the binomial coefficients as a `1 x numFeatures` matrix.** We still store the coefficients as a matrix and the intercepts as a vector. When users call `coefficients` we return them a `Vector` that is backed by the same underlying array as the `coefficientMatrix`, so we don't duplicate any data. At prediction time, we use the old prediction methods that are specialized for binary LOR. The benefits here are that we don't store extra data, and we won't see any regressions in performance. The cost of this is that we have separate implementations for predict methods in the binary vs multiclass case. The duplicated code is really not very high, but it's still a bit messy.
If we do decide to store the 2x coefficients, we would likely want to see some performance tests to understand the potential regressions.
**Update:** We have chosen option 2
### Threshold/thresholds (TODO)
Currently, when `threshold` is set we clear whatever value is in `thresholds` and when `thresholds` is set we clear whatever value is in `threshold`. [SPARK-11543](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11543) was created to prefer thresholds over threshold. We should decide if we should implement this behavior now or if we want to do it in a separate JIRA.
**Update:** Let's leave it for a follow up PR
## Follow up
* Summary model for multiclass logistic regression [SPARK-17139](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17139)
* Thresholds vs threshold [SPARK-11543](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11543)
Author: sethah <seth.hendrickson16@gmail.com>
Closes#14834 from sethah/SPARK-17163.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request changes the behavior of `Word2VecModel.findSynonyms` so that it will not spuriously reject the best match when invoked with a vector that does not correspond to a word in the model's vocabulary. Instead of blindly discarding the best match, the changed implementation discards a match that corresponds to the query word (in cases where `findSynonyms` is invoked with a word) or that has an identical angle to the query vector.
## How was this patch tested?
I added a test to `Word2VecSuite` to ensure that the word with the most similar vector from a supplied vector would not be spuriously rejected.
Author: William Benton <willb@redhat.com>
Closes#15105 from willb/fix/findSynonyms.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
as the TODO described,
check weight vector size and if wrong throw exception.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#15060 from WeichenXu123/check_input_weight_size_of_ann.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#14956 reduced default k-means|| init steps to 2 from 5 only for spark.mllib package, we should also do same change for spark.ml and PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15050 from yanboliang/spark-17389.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reduce default k-means|| init steps to 2 from 5. See JIRA for discussion.
See also https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14948
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14956 from srowen/SPARK-17389.2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#13584 resolved the issue of features and label columns conflict with ```RFormula``` default ones when loading libsvm data, but it still left some issues should be resolved:
1, It’s not necessary to check and rename label column.
Since we have considerations on the design of ```RFormula```, it can handle the case of label column already exists(with restriction of the existing label column should be numeric/boolean type). So it’s not necessary to change the column name to avoid conflict. If the label column is not numeric/boolean type, ```RFormula``` will throw exception.
2, We should rename features column name to new one if there is conflict, but appending a random value is enough since it was used internally only. We done similar work when implementing ```SQLTransformer```.
3, We should set correct new features column for the estimators. Take ```GLM``` as example:
```GLM``` estimator should set features column with the changed one(rFormula.getFeaturesCol) rather than the default “features”. Although it’s same when training model, but it involves problems when predicting. The following is the prediction result of GLM before this PR:
We should drop the internal used feature column name, otherwise, it will appear on the prediction DataFrame which will confused users. And this behavior is same as other scenarios which does not exist column name conflict.
After this PR:
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#14993 from yanboliang/spark-15509.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should generally use `ArrayBuffer.+=(A)` rather than `ArrayBuffer.append(A)`, because `append(A)` would involve extra boxing / unboxing.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>
Closes#14914 from lw-lin/append_to_plus_eq_v2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, remove unnecessary `require()`, because it will make following check useless.
2, update the error msg.
## How was this patch tested?
no test
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#14972 from zhengruifeng/del_unnecessary_check.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```weights``` of ```MultilayerPerceptronClassificationModel``` should be the output weights of layers rather than initial weights, this PR correct it.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc change.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#14967 from yanboliang/mlp-weights.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If `ScalaUDF` throws exceptions during executing user code, sometimes it's hard for users to figure out what's wrong, especially when they use Spark shell. An example
```
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 12 in stage 325.0 failed 4 times, most recent failure: Lost task 12.3 in stage 325.0 (TID 35622, 10.0.207.202): java.lang.NullPointerException
at line8414e872fb8b42aba390efc153d1611a12.$read$$iwC$$iwC$$iwC$$iwC$$anonfun$2.apply(<console>:40)
at line8414e872fb8b42aba390efc153d1611a12.$read$$iwC$$iwC$$iwC$$iwC$$anonfun$2.apply(<console>:40)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown Source)
...
```
We should catch these exceptions and rethrow them with better error message, to say that the exception is happened in scala udf.
This PR also does some clean up for `ScalaUDF` and add a unit test suite for it.
## How was this patch tested?
the new test suite
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#14850 from cloud-fan/npe.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since we have updated breeze version to 0.12, we should remove work around for bug of breeze sparse matrix in v0.11.
I checked all mllib code and found this is the only work around for breeze 0.11.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#14953 from yanboliang/matrices.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Related to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524 -- just the 'fix' rather than a behavior change.
- PythonMLlibAPI methods that take a seed now always take a `java.lang.Long` consistently, allowing the Python API to specify "no seed"
- .mllib's Word2VecModel seemed to be an odd man out in .mllib in that it picked its own random seed. Instead it defaults to None, meaning, letting the Scala implementation pick a seed
- BisectingKMeansModel arguably should not hard-code a seed for consistency with .mllib, I think. However I left it.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14826 from srowen/SPARK-16832.2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improved the code quality of spark by replacing all pattern match on boolean value by if/else block.
## How was this patch tested?
By running the tests
Author: Shivansh <shiv4nsh@gmail.com>
Closes#14873 from shiv4nsh/SPARK-17308.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to add Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test wrapper to SparkR. This wrapper implementation only supports one sample test against normal distribution.
## How was this patch tested?
R unit test.
Author: Junyang Qian <junyangq@databricks.com>
Closes#14881 from junyangq/SPARK-17315.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix `MultivariantOnlineSummerizer.numNonZeros` method,
return `nnz` array, instead of `weightSum` array
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#14923 from WeichenXu123/fix_MultivariantOnlineSummerizer_numNonZeros.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15509
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently in SparkR, when you load a LibSVM dataset using the sqlContext and then pass it to an MLlib algorithm, the ML wrappers will fail since they will try to create a "features" column, which conflicts with the existing "features" column from the LibSVM loader. E.g., using the "mnist" dataset from LibSVM:
`training <- loadDF(sqlContext, ".../mnist", "libsvm")`
`model <- naiveBayes(label ~ features, training)`
This fails with:
```
16/05/24 11:52:41 ERROR RBackendHandler: fit on org.apache.spark.ml.r.NaiveBayesWrapper failed
Error in invokeJava(isStatic = TRUE, className, methodName, ...) :
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Output column features already exists.
at org.apache.spark.ml.feature.VectorAssembler.transformSchema(VectorAssembler.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.ml.Pipeline$$anonfun$transformSchema$4.apply(Pipeline.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.ml.Pipeline$$anonfun$transformSchema$4.apply(Pipeline.scala:179)
at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized$class.foldl(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:57)
at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized$class.foldLeft(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:66)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayOps$ofRef.foldLeft(ArrayOps.scala:186)
at org.apache.spark.ml.Pipeline.transformSchema(Pipeline.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.ml.PipelineStage.transformSchema(Pipeline.scala:67)
at org.apache.spark.ml.Pipeline.fit(Pipeline.scala:131)
at org.apache.spark.ml.feature.RFormula.fit(RFormula.scala:169)
at org.apache.spark.ml.r.NaiveBayesWrapper$.fit(NaiveBayesWrapper.scala:62)
at org.apache.spark.ml.r.NaiveBayesWrapper.fit(NaiveBayesWrapper.sca
The same issue appears for the "label" column once you rename the "features" column.
```
The cause is, when using `loadDF()` to generate dataframes, sometimes it’s with default column name `“label”` and `“features”`, and these two name will conflict with default column names `setDefault(labelCol, "label")` and ` setDefault(featuresCol, "features")` of `SharedParams.scala`
## How was this patch tested?
Test on my local machine.
Author: Xin Ren <iamshrek@126.com>
Closes#13584 from keypointt/SPARK-15509.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid allocating some 0-length arrays, esp. in UTF8String, and by using Array.empty in Scala over Array[T]()
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14895 from srowen/SPARK-17331.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17241
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark has configurable L2 regularization parameter for generalized linear regression. It is very important to have them in SparkR so that users can run ridge regression.
## How was this patch tested?
Test manually on local laptop.
Author: Xin Ren <iamshrek@126.com>
Closes#14856 from keypointt/SPARK-17241.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clean up unused variables and unused import statements, unnecessary `return` and `toArray`, and some more style improvement, when I walk through the code examples.
## How was this patch tested?
Testet manually on local laptop.
Author: Xin Ren <iamshrek@126.com>
Closes#14836 from keypointt/codeWalkThroughML.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow centering / mean scaling of sparse vectors in StandardScaler, if requested. This is for compatibility with `VectorAssembler` in common usages.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests, including new caes to reflect the new behavior.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#14663 from srowen/SPARK-17001.
