### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32015 added a way to run benchmarks much more easily in the same GitHub Actions build. This PR updates the benchmark results by using the way.
**NOTE** that looks like GitHub Actions use four types of CPU given my observations:
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8171M CPU 2.60GHz
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v4 2.30GHz
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 2.40GHz
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8272CL CPU 2.60GHz
Given my quick research, seems like they perform roughly similarly:
I couldn't find enough information about Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8272CL CPU 2.60GHz but the performance seems roughly similar given the numbers.
So shouldn't be a big deal especially given that this way is much easier, encourages contributors to run more and guarantee the same number of cores and same memory with the same softwares.
### Why are the changes needed?
To have a base line of the benchmarks accordingly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
It was generated from:
- [Run benchmarks: * (JDK 11)](https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark/actions/runs/713575465)
- [Run benchmarks: * (JDK 8)](https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark/actions/runs/713154337)
Closes#32044 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34950.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR regenerate the benchmark results in `core` and `mllib` module in order to compare JDK8/JDK11 result.
### Why are the changes needed?
According to the result, For `PropertiesCloneBenchmark` and `UDTSerializationBenchmark`, JDK11 is slightly faster. In general, there is no regression in JDK11.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
This is a test-only PR. Manually run the benchmark.
Closes#25969 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-29297.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before the code changes, I tried to run it with 8G memory:
```
build/sbt -mem 8000 "core/testOnly org.apache.spark.serializer.KryoBenchmark"
```
Still I got got OOM.
This is because the lengths of the arrays are random
669ade3a8e/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoBenchmark.scala (L90-L91)
And the 2D array is usually large: `10000 * Random.nextInt(0, 10000)`
This PR is to fix it and refactor it to use main method.
The benchmark result is also reason compared to the original one.
## How was this patch tested?
Run with
```
bin/spark-submit --class org.apache.spark.serializer.KryoBenchmark core/target/scala-2.11/spark-core_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar
```
and
```
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "core/test:runMain org.apache.spark.serializer.KryoBenchmark"
Closes#22663 from gengliangwang/kyroBenchmark.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
