## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now Spark SQL can support 'create table src stored as orc/parquet/avro' for orc/parquet/avro table. But Hive can support both commands: ' stored as orc/parquet/avro' and 'stored as orcfile/parquetfile/avrofile'.
So this PR supports these keywords 'orcfile/parquetfile/avrofile' in Spark SQL.
## How was this patch tested?
add unit tests
Author: Lianhui Wang <lianhuiwang09@gmail.com>
Closes#13500 from lianhuiwang/SPARK-15756.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the memory for temporary buffer used by TimSort is always allocated as on-heap without bookkeeping, it could cause OOM both in on-heap and off-heap mode.
This PR will try to manage that by preallocate it together with the pointer array, same with RadixSort. It both works for on-heap and off-heap mode.
This PR also change the loadFactor of BytesToBytesMap to 0.5 (it was 0.70), it enables use to radix sort also makes sure that we have enough memory for timsort.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13318 from davies/fix_timsort.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As of this patch, the following throws an exception because the schemas may not match:
```
CREATE TABLE students (age INT, name STRING) AS SELECT * FROM boxes
```
but this is OK:
```
CREATE TABLE students AS SELECT * FROM boxes
```
## How was this patch tested?
SQLQuerySuite, HiveDDLCommandSuite
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#13490 from andrewor14/ctas-no-column.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For input object of non-flat type, we can't encode it to row if it's null, as Spark SQL doesn't allow row to be null, only its columns can be null.
This PR explicitly add this constraint and throw exception if users break it.
## How was this patch tested?
several new tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13469 from cloud-fan/null-object.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are 2 kinds of `GetStructField`:
1. resolved from `UnresolvedExtractValue`, and it will have a `name` property.
2. created when we build deserializer expression for nested tuple, no `name` property.
When we want to validate the ordinals of nested tuple, we should only catch `GetStructField` without the name property.
## How was this patch tested?
new test in `EncoderResolutionSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13474 from cloud-fan/ordinal-check.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before this PR, the output of EXPLAIN of following SQL is like
```SQL
CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE extTable_with_partitions (key INT, value STRING)
PARTITIONED BY (ds STRING, hr STRING)
LOCATION '/private/var/folders/4b/sgmfldk15js406vk7lw5llzw0000gn/T/spark-b39a6185-8981-403b-a4aa-36fb2f4ca8a9'
```
``ExecutedCommand CreateTableCommand CatalogTable(`extTable_with_partitions`,CatalogTableType(EXTERNAL),CatalogStorageFormat(Some(/private/var/folders/4b/sgmfldk15js406vk7lw5llzw0000gn/T/spark-dd234718-e85d-4c5a-8353-8f1834ac0323),Some(org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat),Some(org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveIgnoreKeyTextOutputFormat),None,false,Map()),List(CatalogColumn(key,int,true,None), CatalogColumn(value,string,true,None), CatalogColumn(ds,string,true,None), CatalogColumn(hr,string,true,None)),List(ds, hr),List(),List(),-1,,1463026413544,-1,Map(),None,None,None), false``
After this PR, the output is like
```
ExecutedCommand
: +- CreateTableCommand CatalogTable(
Table:`extTable_with_partitions`
Created:Thu Jun 02 21:30:54 PDT 2016
Last Access:Wed Dec 31 15:59:59 PST 1969
Type:EXTERNAL
Schema:[`key` int, `value` string, `ds` string, `hr` string]
Partition Columns:[`ds`, `hr`]
Storage(Location:/private/var/folders/4b/sgmfldk15js406vk7lw5llzw0000gn/T/spark-a06083b8-8e88-4d07-9ff0-d6bd8d943ad3, InputFormat:org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat, OutputFormat:org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveIgnoreKeyTextOutputFormat)), false
```
This is also applicable to `DESC EXTENDED`. However, this does not have special handling for Data Source Tables. If needed, we need to move the logics of `DDLUtil`. Let me know if we should do it in this PR. Thanks! rxin liancheng
#### How was this patch tested?
Manual testing
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13070 from gatorsmile/betterExplainCatalogTable.
In Catalyst's TreeNode transform methods we end up calling `productIterator.map(...).toArray` in a number of places, which is slightly inefficient because it needs to allocate an `ArrayBuilder` and grow a temporary array. Since we already know the size of the final output (`productArity`), we can simply allocate an array up-front and use a while loop to consume the iterator and populate the array.
For most workloads, this performance difference is negligible but it does make a measurable difference in optimizer performance for queries that operate over very wide schemas (such as the benchmark queries in #13456).
### Perf results (from #13456 benchmarks)
**Before**
```
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_66-b17 on Mac OS X 10.10.5
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
parsing large select: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 select expressions 19 / 22 0.0 19119858.0 1.0X
10 select expressions 23 / 25 0.0 23208774.0 0.8X
100 select expressions 55 / 73 0.0 54768402.0 0.3X
1000 select expressions 229 / 259 0.0 228606373.0 0.1X
2500 select expressions 530 / 554 0.0 529938178.0 0.0X
```
**After**
```
parsing large select: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 select expressions 15 / 21 0.0 14978203.0 1.0X
10 select expressions 22 / 27 0.0 22492262.0 0.7X
100 select expressions 48 / 64 0.0 48449834.0 0.3X
1000 select expressions 189 / 208 0.0 189346428.0 0.1X
2500 select expressions 429 / 449 0.0 428943897.0 0.0X
```
###
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#13484 from JoshRosen/treenode-productiterator-map.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Queries with scalar sub-query in the SELECT list run against a local, in-memory relation throw
UnsupportedOperationException exception.
Problem repro:
```SQL
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t1")
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t2")
scala> sql("select (select min(c1) from t2) from t1").show()
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot evaluate expression: scalar-subquery#62 []
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Unevaluable$class.eval(Expression.scala:215)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ScalarSubquery.eval(subquery.scala:62)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Alias.eval(namedExpressions.scala:142)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.InterpretedProjection.apply(Projection.scala:45)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.InterpretedProjection.apply(Projection.scala:29)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:381)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:285)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConvertToLocalRelation$$anonfun$apply$37.applyOrElse(Optimizer.scala:1473)
```
The problem is specific to local, in memory relations. It is caused by rule ConvertToLocalRelation, which attempts to push down
a scalar-subquery expression to the local tables.
The solution prevents the rule to apply if Project references scalar subqueries.
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests to SubquerySuite.scala
Author: Ioana Delaney <ioanamdelaney@gmail.com>
Closes#13418 from ioana-delaney/scalarSubV2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Our encoder framework has been evolved a lot, this PR tries to clean up the code to make it more readable and emphasise the concept that encoder should be used as a container of serde expressions.
1. move validation logic to analyzer instead of encoder
2. only have a `resolveAndBind` method in encoder instead of `resolve` and `bind`, as we don't have the encoder life cycle concept anymore.
3. `Dataset` don't need to keep a resolved encoder, as there is no such concept anymore. bound encoder is still needed to do serialization outside of query framework.
4. Using `BoundReference` to represent an unresolved field in deserializer expression is kind of weird, this PR adds a `GetColumnByOrdinal` for this purpose. (serializer expression still use `BoundReference`, we can replace it with `GetColumnByOrdinal` in follow-ups)
## How was this patch tested?
existing test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#13269 from cloud-fan/clean-encoder.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For consistency, this PR updates some remaining `TungstenAggregation/SortBasedAggregate` after SPARK-15728.
- Update a comment in codegen in `VectorizedHashMapGenerator.scala`.
- `TungstenAggregationQuerySuite` --> `HashAggregationQuerySuite`
- `TungstenAggregationQueryWithControlledFallbackSuite` --> `HashAggregationQueryWithControlledFallbackSuite`
- Update two error messages in `SQLQuerySuite.scala` and `AggregationQuerySuite.scala`.
- Update several comments.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual (Only comment changes and test suite renamings).
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13487 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15744.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a cleaner approach in general but my motivation behind this change in particular is to be able to run these tests from anywhere without relying on system properties.
## How was this patch tested?
Test only change
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#13489 from sameeragarwal/resourcepath.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
##### The root cause:
When `DataSource.resolveRelation` is trying to build `ListingFileCatalog` object, `ListLeafFiles` is invoked where a list of `FileStatus` objects are retrieved from the provided path. These FileStatus objects include directories for the partitions (id=0 and id=2 in the jira). However, these directory `FileStatus` objects also try to invoke `getFileBlockLocations` where directory is not allowed for `DistributedFileSystem`, hence the exception happens.
This PR is to remove the block of code that invokes `getFileBlockLocations` for every FileStatus object of the provided path. Instead, we call `HadoopFsRelation.listLeafFiles` directly because this utility method filters out the directories before calling `getFileBlockLocations` for generating `LocatedFileStatus` objects.
## How was this patch tested?
Regtest is run. Manual test:
```
scala> spark.read.format("parquet").load("hdfs://bdavm009.svl.ibm.com:8020/user/spark/SPARK-14959_part").show
+-----+---+
| text| id|
+-----+---+
|hello| 0|
|world| 0|
|hello| 1|
|there| 1|
+-----+---+
spark.read.format("orc").load("hdfs://bdavm009.svl.ibm.com:8020/user/spark/SPARK-14959_orc").show
+-----+---+
| text| id|
+-----+---+
|hello| 0|
|world| 0|
|hello| 1|
|there| 1|
+-----+---+
```
I also tried it with 2 level of partitioning.
I have not found a way to add test case in the unit test bucket that can test a real hdfs file location. Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Author: Xin Wu <xinwu@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13463 from xwu0226/SPARK-14959.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes the explain output less verbose by hiding some verbose output like `None`, `null`, empty List `[]`, empty set `{}`, and etc.
**Before change**:
```
== Physical Plan ==
ExecutedCommand
: +- ShowTablesCommand None, None
```
**After change**:
```
== Physical Plan ==
ExecutedCommand
: +- ShowTablesCommand
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#13470 from clockfly/verbose_breakdown_4.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds microbenchmarks for tracking performance of queries over very wide or deeply nested DataFrames. It seems performance degrades when DataFrames get thousands of columns wide or hundreds of fields deep.
## How was this patch tested?
Current results included.
cc rxin JoshRosen
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#13456 from ericl/sc-3468.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When users create a case class and use java reserved keyword as field name, spark sql will generate illegal java code and throw exception at runtime.
This PR checks the field names when building the encoder, and if illegal field names are used, throw exception immediately with a good error message.
## How was this patch tested?
new test in DatasetSuite
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13485 from cloud-fan/java.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This command didn't work for Hive tables. Now it does:
```
ALTER TABLE boxes PARTITION (width=3)
SET SERDE 'com.sparkbricks.serde.ColumnarSerDe'
WITH SERDEPROPERTIES ('compress'='true')
```
## How was this patch tested?
`HiveExternalCatalogSuite`
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#13453 from andrewor14/alter-partition-storage.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we don't support bucketing for `save` and `insertInto`.
For `save`, we just write the data out into a directory users specified, and it's not a table, we don't keep its metadata. When we read it back, we have no idea if the data is bucketed or not, so it doesn't make sense to use `save` to write bucketed data, as we can't use the bucket information anyway.
We can support it in the future, once we have features like bucket discovery, or we save bucket information in the data directory too, so that we don't need to rely on a metastore.
For `insertInto`, it inserts data into an existing table, so it doesn't make sense to specify bucket information, as we should get the bucket information from the existing table.
This PR improves the error message for the above 2 cases.
## How was this patch tested?
new test in `BukctedWriteSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13452 from cloud-fan/error-msg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR disables writing Parquet summary files by default (i.e., when Hadoop configuration "parquet.enable.summary-metadata" is not set).
Please refer to [SPARK-15719][1] for more details.
## How was this patch tested?
New test case added in `ParquetQuerySuite` to check no summary files are written by default.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15719
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#13455 from liancheng/spark-15719-disable-parquet-summary-files.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR bans syntax like `CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE USING AS SELECT`
`CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE ... USING ... AS ...` is not properly implemented, the temporary data is not cleaned up when the session exits. Before a full fix, we probably should ban this syntax.
This PR only impact syntax like `CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE ... USING ... AS ...`.
Other syntax like `CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE .. USING ...` and `CREATE TABLE ... USING ...` are not impacted.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#13451 from clockfly/ban_create_temp_table_using_as.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to address the following issues:
- **ISSUE 1:** For ORC source format, we are reporting the strange error message when we did not enable Hive support:
```SQL
SQL Example:
select id from `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc`.`file_path`
Error Message:
Table or view not found: `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc`.`file_path`
```
Instead, we should issue the error message like:
```
Expected Error Message:
The ORC data source must be used with Hive support enabled
```
- **ISSUE 2:** For the Avro format, we report the strange error message like:
The example query is like
```SQL
SQL Example:
select id from `avro`.`file_path`
select id from `com.databricks.spark.avro`.`file_path`
Error Message:
Table or view not found: `com.databricks.spark.avro`.`file_path`
```
The desired message should be like:
```
Expected Error Message:
Failed to find data source: avro. Please use Spark package http://spark-packages.org/package/databricks/spark-avro"
```
- ~~**ISSUE 3:** Unable to detect incompatibility libraries for Spark 2.0 in Data Source Resolution. We report a strange error message:~~
**Update**: The latest code changes contains
- For JDBC format, we added an extra checking in the rule `ResolveRelations` of `Analyzer`. Without the PR, Spark will return the error message like: `Option 'url' not specified`. Now, we are reporting `Unsupported data source type for direct query on files: jdbc`
- Make data source format name case incensitive so that error handling behaves consistent with the normal cases.
- Added the test cases for all the supported formats.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to cover all the above issues
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#13283 from gatorsmile/runSQLAgainstFile.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently have two physical aggregate operators: TungstenAggregate and SortBasedAggregate. These names don't make a lot of sense from an end-user point of view. This patch renames them HashAggregate and SortAggregate.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated test cases.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#13465 from rxin/SPARK-15728.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes a number of `com.esotericsoftware.kryo.KryoException: java.lang.NullPointerException` exceptions reported in [SPARK-15604], [SPARK-14752] etc. (while executing sparkSQL queries with the kryo serializer) by explicitly implementing `KryoSerialization` for `LazilyGenerateOrdering`.
## How was this patch tested?
1. Modified `OrderingSuite` so that all tests in the suite also test kryo serialization (for both interpreted and generated ordering).
2. Manually verified TPC-DS q1.
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#13466 from sameeragarwal/kryo.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR corrects the remaining cases for using old accumulators.
This does not change some old accumulator usages below:
- `ImplicitSuite.scala` - Tests dedicated to old accumulator, for implicits with `AccumulatorParam`
- `AccumulatorSuite.scala` - Tests dedicated to old accumulator
- `JavaSparkContext.scala` - For supporting old accumulators for Java API.
- `debug.package.scala` - Usage with `HashSet[String]`. Currently, it seems no implementation for this. I might be able to write an anonymous class for this but I didn't because I think it is not worth writing a lot of codes only for this.
- `SQLMetricsSuite.scala` - This uses the old accumulator for checking type boxing. It seems new accumulator does not require type boxing for this case whereas the old one requires (due to the use of generic).
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests cover this.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#13434 from HyukjinKwon/accum.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `freqItems` raises `UnsupportedOperationException` on `empty.min` usually when its `support` argument is high.
```scala
scala> spark.createDataset(Seq(1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3)).stat.freqItems(Seq("value"), 2)
16/06/01 11:11:38 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 5.0 in stage 0.0 (TID 5)
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: empty.min
...
```
Also, the parameter checking message is wrong.
```
require(support >= 1e-4, s"support ($support) must be greater than 1e-4.")
```
This PR changes the logic to handle the `empty` case and also improves parameter checking.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests (with a new testcase).
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13449 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15709.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR add a rule at the end of analyzer to correct nullable fields of attributes in a logical plan by using nullable fields of the corresponding attributes in its children logical plans (these plans generate the input rows).
This is another approach for addressing SPARK-13484 (the first approach is https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11371).
Close#113711
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#13290 from yhuai/SPARK-13484.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Join on transformed dataset has attributes conflicts, which make query execution failure, for example:
```
val dataset = Seq(1, 2, 3).toDs
val mappedDs = dataset.map(_ + 1)
mappedDs.as("t1").joinWith(mappedDs.as("t2"), $"t1.value" === $"t2.value").show()
```
will throw exception:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '`t1.value`' given input columns: [value];
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.package$AnalysisErrorAt.failAnalysis(package.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(CheckAnalysis.scala:62)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(CheckAnalysis.scala:59)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:287)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:287)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes#13399 from jerryshao/SPARK-15620.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When `spark.sql.hive.convertCTAS` is true, for a CTAS statement, we will create a data source table using the default source (i.e. parquet) if the CTAS does not specify any Hive storage format. However, there are two issues with this conversion logic.
1. First, we determine if a CTAS statement defines storage format by checking the serde. However, TEXTFILE/SEQUENCEFILE does not have a default serde. When we do the check, we have not set the default serde. So, a query like `CREATE TABLE abc STORED AS TEXTFILE AS SELECT ...` actually creates a data source parquet table.
2. In the conversion logic, we are ignoring the user-specified location.
This PR fixes the above two issues.
Also, this PR makes the parser throws an exception when a CTAS statement has a PARTITIONED BY clause. This change is made because Hive's syntax does not allow it and our current implementation actually does not work for this case (the insert operation always throws an exception because the insertion does not pick up the partitioning info).
## How was this patch tested?
I am adding new tests in SQLQuerySuite and HiveDDLCommandSuite.
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#13386 from yhuai/SPARK-14507.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improves the explain output of several physical plans by displaying embedded logical plan in tree style
Some physical plan contains a embedded logical plan, for example, `cache tableName query` maps to:
```
case class CacheTableCommand(
tableName: String,
plan: Option[LogicalPlan],
isLazy: Boolean)
extends RunnableCommand
```
It is easier to read the explain output if we can display the `plan` in tree style.
**Before change:**
Everything is messed in one line.
```
scala> Seq((1,2)).toDF().createOrReplaceTempView("testView")
scala> spark.sql("cache table testView2 select * from testView").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
ExecutedCommand CacheTableCommand testView2, Some('Project [*]
+- 'UnresolvedRelation `testView`, None
), false
```
**After change:**
```
scala> spark.sql("cache table testView2 select * from testView").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
ExecutedCommand
: +- CacheTableCommand testView2, false
: : +- 'Project [*]
: : +- 'UnresolvedRelation `testView`, None
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#13433 from clockfly/verbose_breakdown_3_2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we can't encode top level null object into internal row, as Spark SQL doesn't allow row to be null, only its columns can be null.
This is not a problem before, as we assume the input object is never null. However, for outer join, we do need the semantics of null object.
This PR fixes this problem by making both join sides produce a single column, i.e. nest the logical plan output(by `CreateStruct`), so that we have an extra level to represent top level null obejct.
## How was this patch tested?
new test in `DatasetSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13425 from cloud-fan/outer-join2.
This PR is an alternative to #13120 authored by xwu0226.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When creating an external Spark SQL data source table and persisting its metadata to Hive metastore, we don't use the standard Hive `Table.dataLocation` field because Hive only allows directory paths as data locations while Spark SQL also allows file paths. However, if we don't set `Table.dataLocation`, Hive always creates an unexpected empty table directory under database location, but doesn't remove it while dropping the table (because the table is external).
This PR works around this issue by explicitly setting `Table.dataLocation` and then manullay removing the created directory after creating the external table.
Please refer to [this JIRA comment][1] for more details about why we chose this approach as a workaround.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15269?focusedCommentId=15297408&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15297408
## How was this patch tested?
1. A new test case is added in `HiveQuerySuite` for this case
2. Updated `ShowCreateTableSuite` to use the same table name in all test cases. (This is how I hit this issue at the first place.)
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#13270 from liancheng/spark-15269-unpleasant-fix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**SPARK-15596**: Even after we renamed a cached table, the plan would remain in the cache with the old table name. If I created a new table using the old name then the old table would return incorrect data. Note that this applies only to Hive tables.
**SPARK-15635**: Renaming a datasource table would render the table not query-able. This is because we store the location of the table in a "path" property, which was not updated to reflect Hive's change in table location following a rename.
## How was this patch tested?
DDLSuite
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#13416 from andrewor14/rename-table.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch moves all user-facing structured streaming classes into sql.streaming. As part of this, I also added some since version annotation to methods and classes that don't have them.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated tests to reflect the moves.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#13429 from rxin/SPARK-15686.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Text data source ignores requested schema, and may give wrong result when the only data column is not requested. This may happen when only partitioning column(s) are requested for a partitioned text table.
## How was this patch tested?
New test case added in `TextSuite`.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#13431 from liancheng/spark-14343-partitioned-text-table.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently `spark.sql.warehouse.dir` is pointed to local dir by default, which will throw exception when HADOOP_CONF_DIR is configured and default FS is hdfs.
```
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong FS: file:/Users/sshao/projects/apache-spark/spark-warehouse, expected: hdfs://localhost:8020
```
So we should always get the `FileSystem` from `Path` to avoid wrong FS problem.
## How was this patch tested?
Local test.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes#13405 from jerryshao/SPARK-15659.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes function `SparkSession.builder.sparkContext(..)` from **private[sql]** into **private[spark]**, and uses it if applicable like the followings.
```
- val spark = SparkSession.builder().config(sc.getConf).getOrCreate()
+ val spark = SparkSession.builder().sparkContext(sc).getOrCreate()
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing Jenkins tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13365 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15618.
This PR fixes a sample code, a description, and indentations in docs.
Manual.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13420 from dongjoon-hyun/minor_fix_dataset_doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes "Can't drop top level columns that contain dots".
This work is based on dilipbiswal's https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943.
This PR fixes problems like:
```
scala> Seq((1, 2)).toDF("a.b", "a.c").drop("a.b")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '`a.c`' given input columns: [a.b, a.c];
```
`drop(columnName)` can only be used to drop top level column, so, we should parse the column name literally WITHOUT interpreting dot "."
We should also NOT interpret back tick "`", otherwise it is hard to understand what
```
```aaa```bbb``
```
actually means.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#13306 from clockfly/fix_drop_column.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In benchmarks involving tables with very wide and complex schemas (thousands of columns, deep nesting), I noticed that significant amounts of time (order of tens of seconds per task) were being spent generating comments during the code generation phase.
The root cause of the performance problem stems from the fact that calling toString() on a complex expression can involve thousands of string concatenations, resulting in huge amounts (tens of gigabytes) of character array allocation and copying.
In the long term, we can avoid this problem by passing StringBuilders down the tree and using them to accumulate output. As a short-term workaround, this patch guards comment generation behind a flag and disables comments by default (for wide tables / complex queries, these comments were being truncated prior to display and thus were not very useful).
## How was this patch tested?
This was tested manually by running a Spark SQL query over an empty table with a very wide schema obtained from a real workload. Disabling comments brought the per-task time down from about 16 seconds to 600 milliseconds.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#13421 from JoshRosen/disable-line-comments-in-codegen.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch does a few things:
1. Adds since version annotation to methods and classes in sql.catalog.
2. Fixed a typo in FilterFunction and a whitespace issue in spark/api/java/function/package.scala
3. Added "database" field to Function class.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated unit test case for "database" field in Function class.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#13406 from rxin/SPARK-15662.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently structured streaming only supports append output mode. This PR adds the following.
- Added support for Complete output mode in the internal state store, analyzer and planner.
- Added public API in Scala and Python for users to specify output mode
- Added checks for unsupported combinations of output mode and DF operations
- Plans with no aggregation should support only Append mode
- Plans with aggregation should support only Update and Complete modes
- Default output mode is Append mode (**Question: should we change this to automatically set to Complete mode when there is aggregation?**)
- Added support for Complete output mode in Memory Sink. So Memory Sink internally supports append and complete, update. But from public API only Complete and Append output modes are supported.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in various test suites
- StreamingAggregationSuite: tests for complete mode
- MemorySinkSuite: tests for checking behavior in Append and Complete modes.
- UnsupportedOperationSuite: tests for checking unsupported combinations of DF ops and output modes
- DataFrameReaderWriterSuite: tests for checking that output mode cannot be called on static DFs
- Python doc test and existing unit tests modified to call write.outputMode.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#13286 from tdas/complete-mode.
In this case, the result type of the expression becomes DECIMAL(38, 36) as we promote the individual string literals to DECIMAL(38, 18) when we handle string promotions for `BinaryArthmaticExpression`.
I think we need to cast the string literals to Double type instead. I looked at the history and found that this was changed to use decimal instead of double to avoid potential loss of precision when we cast decimal to double.
To double check i ran the query against hive, mysql. This query returns non NULL result for both the databases and both promote the expression to use double.
Here is the output.
- Hive
```SQL
hive> create table l2 as select (cast(99 as decimal(19,6)) + '2') from l1;
OK
hive> describe l2;
OK
_c0 double
```
- MySQL
```SQL
mysql> create table foo2 as select (cast(99 as decimal(19,6)) + '2') from test;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
mysql> describe foo2;
+-----------------------------------+--------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+-----------------------------------+--------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| (cast(99 as decimal(19,6)) + '2') | double | NO | | 0 | |
+-----------------------------------+--------+------+-----+---------+-------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test in SQLQuerySuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13368 from dilipbiswal/spark-15557.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Right now, we will split the code for expressions into multiple functions when it exceed 64k, which requires that the the expressions are using Row object, but this is not true for whole-state codegen, it will fail to compile after splitted.
This PR will not split the code in whole-stage codegen.
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13235 from davies/fix_nested_codegen.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit c24b6b679c. Sent a PR to run Jenkins tests due to the revert conflicts of `dev/deps/spark-deps-hadoop*`.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#13417 from zsxwing/revert-SPARK-11753.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we build serializer for UDT object, we should declare its data type as udt instead of udt.sqlType, or if we deserialize it again, we lose the information that it's a udt object and throw analysis exception.
## How was this patch tested?
new test in `UserDefiendTypeSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13402 from cloud-fan/udt.
