### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use a proper built-in exceptions instead of the plain `Exception` in Python.
While I am here, I fixed another minor issue at `DataFrams.schema` together:
```diff
- except AttributeError as e:
- raise Exception(
- "Unable to parse datatype from schema. %s" % e)
+ except Exception as e:
+ raise ValueError(
+ "Unable to parse datatype from schema. %s" % e) from e
```
Now it catches all exceptions during schema parsing, chains the exception with `ValueError`. Previously it only caught `AttributeError` that does not catch all cases.
### Why are the changes needed?
For users to expect the proper exceptions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yeah, the exception classes became different but should be compatible because previous exception was plain `Exception` which other exceptions inherit.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unittests should cover,
Closes#31238Closes#32650 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-32194.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to drop Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5.
Roughly speaking, it removes all the widely known Python 2 compatibility workarounds such as `sys.version` comparison, `__future__`. Also, it removes the Python 2 dedicated codes such as `ArrayConstructor` in Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. Unsupport EOL Python versions
2. Reduce maintenance overhead and remove a bit of legacy codes and hacks for Python 2.
3. PyPy2 has a critical bug that causes a flaky test, SPARK-28358 given my testing and investigation.
4. Users can use Python type hints with Pandas UDFs without thinking about Python version
5. Users can leverage one latest cloudpickle, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28950. With Python 3.8+ it can also leverage C pickle.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users cannot use Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 in the upcoming Spark version.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and also tested in Jenkins.
Closes#28957 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-32138.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Before, you could have this code
```
A = SparseMatrix(2, 2, [0, 2, 3], [0], [2])
B = DenseMatrix(2, 2, [2, 0, 0, 0])
B == A # False
A == B # True
```
The second would be `True` as `SparseMatrix` already checks for semantic
equality. This commit changes `DenseMatrix` so that equality is
semantical as well.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Better semantic equality for DenseMatrix
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests were added, plus manual testing. Note that the code falls back to the old behavior when `other` is not a SparseMatrix.
Closes#17968 from gglanzani/SPARK-9792.
Authored-by: Giovanni Lanzani <giovanni@lanzani.nl>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix implementation of unary negation (`__neg__`) in Pyspark DenseVectors
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests, plus new doctest
Closes#23570 from srowen/SPARK-26638.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
The exit() builtin is only for interactive use. applications should use sys.exit().
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
All usage of the builtin `exit()` function is replaced by `sys.exit()`.
## How was this patch tested?
I ran `python/run-tests`.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
Closes#20682 from benjaminp/sys-exit.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`_convert_to_vector` converts a scipy sparse matrix to csc matrix for initializing `SparseVector`. However, it doesn't guarantee the converted csc matrix has sorted indices and so a failure happens when you do something like that:
from scipy.sparse import lil_matrix
lil = lil_matrix((4, 1))
lil[1, 0] = 1
lil[3, 0] = 2
_convert_to_vector(lil.todok())
File "/home/jenkins/workspace/python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py", line 78, in _convert_to_vector
return SparseVector(l.shape[0], csc.indices, csc.data)
File "/home/jenkins/workspace/python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py", line 556, in __init__
% (self.indices[i], self.indices[i + 1]))
TypeError: Indices 3 and 1 are not strictly increasing
A simple test can confirm that `dok_matrix.tocsc()` won't guarantee sorted indices:
>>> from scipy.sparse import lil_matrix
>>> lil = lil_matrix((4, 1))
>>> lil[1, 0] = 1
>>> lil[3, 0] = 2
>>> dok = lil.todok()
>>> csc = dok.tocsc()
>>> csc.has_sorted_indices
0
>>> csc.indices
array([3, 1], dtype=int32)
I checked the source codes of scipy. The only way to guarantee it is `csc_matrix.tocsr()` and `csr_matrix.tocsc()`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#17532 from viirya/make-sure-sorted-indices.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replaces` ValueError` with `IndexError` when index passed to `ml` / `mllib` `SparseVector.__getitem__` is out of range. This ensures correct iteration behavior.
Replaces `ValueError` with `IndexError` for `DenseMatrix` and `SparkMatrix` in `ml` / `mllib`.
## How was this patch tested?
PySpark `ml` / `mllib` unit tests. Additional unit tests to prove that the problem has been resolved.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#15144 from zero323/SPARK-17587.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
General decisions to follow, except where noted:
* spark.mllib, pyspark.mllib: Remove all Experimental annotations. Leave DeveloperApi annotations alone.
* spark.ml, pyspark.ml
** Annotate Estimator-Model pairs of classes and companion objects the same way.
** For all algorithms marked Experimental with Since tag <= 1.6, remove Experimental annotation.
** For all algorithms marked Experimental with Since tag = 2.0, leave Experimental annotation.
* DeveloperApi annotations are left alone, except where noted.
* No changes to which types are sealed.
Exceptions where I am leaving items Experimental in spark.ml, pyspark.ml, mainly because the items are new:
* Model Summary classes
* MLWriter, MLReader, MLWritable, MLReadable
* Evaluator and subclasses: There is discussion of changes around evaluating multiple metrics at once for efficiency.
* RFormula: Its behavior may need to change slightly to match R in edge cases.
* AFTSurvivalRegression
* MultilayerPerceptronClassifier
DeveloperApi changes:
* ml.tree.Node, ml.tree.Split, and subclasses should no longer be DeveloperApi
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Note to reviewers:
* spark.ml.clustering.LDA underwent significant changes (additional methods), so let me know if you want me to leave it Experimental.
* Be careful to check for cases where a class should no longer be Experimental but has an Experimental method, val, or other feature. I did not find such cases, but please verify.
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#14147 from jkbradley/experimental-audit.
The move to `ml.linalg` created `asML`/`fromML` utility methods in Scala/Java for converting between representations. These are missing in Python, this PR adds them.
## How was this patch tested?
New doctests.
Author: Nick Pentreath <nickp@za.ibm.com>
Closes#13997 from MLnick/SPARK-16328-python-linalg-convert.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The check on the end parenthesis of the expression to parse was using the wrong variable. I corrected that.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test
Author: andreapasqua <andrea@radius.com>
Closes#13750 from andreapasqua/sparse-vector-parser-assertion-fix.
This PR adds the remaining group of methods to PySpark's distributed linear algebra classes as follows:
* `RowMatrix` <sup>**[1]**</sup>
1. `computeGramianMatrix`
2. `computeCovariance`
3. `computeColumnSummaryStatistics`
4. `columnSimilarities`
5. `tallSkinnyQR` <sup>**[2]**</sup>
* `IndexedRowMatrix` <sup>**[3]**</sup>
1. `computeGramianMatrix`
* `CoordinateMatrix`
1. `transpose`
* `BlockMatrix`
1. `validate`
2. `cache`
3. `persist`
4. `transpose`
**[1]**: Note: `multiply`, `computeSVD`, and `computePrincipalComponents` are already part of PR #7963 for SPARK-6227.
**[2]**: Implementing `tallSkinnyQR` uncovered a bug with our PySpark `RowMatrix` constructor. As discussed on the dev list [here](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/K-Means-And-Class-Tags-td10038.html), there appears to be an issue with type erasure with RDDs coming from Java, and by extension from PySpark. Although we are attempting to construct a `RowMatrix` from an `RDD[Vector]` in [PythonMLlibAPI](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala#L1115), the `Vector` type is erased, resulting in an `RDD[Object]`. Thus, when calling Scala's `tallSkinnyQR` from PySpark, we get a Java `ClassCastException` in which an `Object` cannot be cast to a Spark `Vector`. As noted in the aforementioned dev list thread, this issue was also encountered with `DecisionTrees`, and the fix involved an explicit `retag` of the RDD with a `Vector` type. Thus, this PR currently contains that fix applied to the `createRowMatrix` helper function in `PythonMLlibAPI`. `IndexedRowMatrix` and `CoordinateMatrix` do not appear to have this issue likely due to their related helper functions in `PythonMLlibAPI` creating the RDDs explicitly from DataFrames with pattern matching, thus preserving the types. However, this fix may be out of scope for this single PR, and it may be better suited in a separate JIRA/PR. Therefore, I have marked this PR as WIP and am open to discussion.
**[3]**: Note: `multiply` and `computeSVD` are already part of PR #7963 for SPARK-6227.
Author: Mike Dusenberry <mwdusenb@us.ibm.com>
Closes#9441 from dusenberrymw/SPARK-9656_Add_Missing_Methods_to_PySpark_Distributed_Linear_Algebra.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PySpark deserialization has a bug that shows while deserializing all zero sparse vectors. This fix filters out empty string tokens before casting, hence properly stringified SparseVectors successfully get parsed.
## How was this patch tested?
Standard unit-tests similar to other methods.
Author: Arash Parsa <arash@ip-192-168-50-106.ec2.internal>
Author: Arash Parsa <arashpa@gmail.com>
Author: Vishnu Prasad <vishnu667@gmail.com>
Author: Vishnu Prasad S <vishnu667@gmail.com>
Closes#12516 from arashpa/SPARK-14739.
There's a small typo in the SparseVector.parse docstring (which says that it returns a DenseVector rather than a SparseVector), which seems to be incorrect.
Author: Miles Yucht <miles@databricks.com>
Closes#11213 from mgyucht/fix-sparsevector-docs.
At this moment `SparseVector.__getitem__` executes `np.searchsorted` first and checks if result is in an expected range after that. It is possible to check if index can contain non-zero value before executing `np.searchsorted`.
Author: zero323 <matthew.szymkiewicz@gmail.com>
Closes#9098 from zero323/sparse_vector_getitem_improved.
…rror message
For negative indices in the SparseVector, we update the index value. If we have an incorrect index
at this point, the error message has the incorrect *updated* index instead of the original one. This
change contains the fix for the same.
Author: Bhargav Mangipudi <bhargav.mangipudi@gmail.com>
Closes#9069 from bhargav/spark-10759.
__gettitem__ method throws IndexError exception when we try to access index after the last non-zero entry
from pyspark.mllib.linalg import Vectors
sv = Vectors.sparse(5, {1: 3})
sv[0]
## 0.0
sv[1]
## 3.0
sv[2]
## Traceback (most recent call last):
## File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
## File "/python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py", line 734, in __getitem__
## row_ind = inds[insert_index]
## IndexError: index out of bounds
Author: zero323 <matthew.szymkiewicz@gmail.com>
Closes#9009 from zero323/sparse_vector_index_error.
There are some missing API docs in pyspark.mllib.linalg.Vector (including DenseVector and SparseVector). We should add them based on their Scala counterparts.
Author: vinodkc <vinod.kc.in@gmail.com>
Closes#8834 from vinodkc/fix_SPARK-10631.
PySpark DenseVector, SparseVector ```__eq__``` method should use semantics equality, and DenseVector can compared with SparseVector.
Implement PySpark DenseVector, SparseVector ```__hash__``` method based on the first 16 entries. That will make PySpark Vector objects can be used in collections.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#8166 from yanboliang/spark-9793.
This is based on MechCoder 's PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7731. Hopefully it could pass tests. MechCoder I tried to make minimal changes. If this passes Jenkins, we can merge this one first and then try to move `__init__.py` to `local.py` in a separate PR.
Closes#7731
Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Closes#7746 from mengxr/SPARK-9408 and squashes the following commits:
0e05a3b [Xiangrui Meng] merge master
1135551 [Xiangrui Meng] add a comment for str(...)
c48cae0 [Xiangrui Meng] update tests
173a805 [Xiangrui Meng] move linalg.py to linalg/__init__.py
2015-07-30 16:57:38 -07:00
Renamed from python/pyspark/mllib/linalg.py (Browse further)