## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQueryStatus.json
- Make it not case class (to avoid unnecessarily exposing implicit object StreamingQueryStatus, consistent with StreamingQueryProgress)
- Add StreamingQuery.status to Python
- Fix post-termination status
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#16075 from tdas/SPARK-18516-1.
This PR separates the status of a `StreamingQuery` into two separate APIs:
- `status` - describes the status of a `StreamingQuery` at this moment, including what phase of processing is currently happening and if data is available.
- `recentProgress` - an array of statistics about the most recent microbatches that have executed.
A recent progress contains the following information:
```
{
"id" : "2be8670a-fce1-4859-a530-748f29553bb6",
"name" : "query-29",
"timestamp" : 1479705392724,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303,
"durationMs" : {
"triggerExecution" : 276,
"queryPlanning" : 3,
"getBatch" : 5,
"getOffset" : 3,
"addBatch" : 234,
"walCommit" : 30
},
"currentWatermark" : 0,
"stateOperators" : [ ],
"sources" : [ {
"description" : "KafkaSource[Subscribe[topic-14]]",
"startOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 0,
"4" : 1,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 0
}
},
"endOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 1,
"4" : 2,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 1
}
},
"numRecords" : 3,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303
} ]
}
```
Additionally, in order to make it possible to correlate progress updates across restarts, we change the `id` field from an integer that is unique with in the JVM to a `UUID` that is globally unique.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#15954 from marmbrus/queryProgress.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a crossJoin function to the DataFrame API similar to that in Scala. Joins with no condition (cartesian products) must be specified with the crossJoin API
## How was this patch tested?
Added python tests to ensure that an AnalysisException if a cartesian product is specified without crossJoin(), and that cartesian products can execute if specified via crossJoin()
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: Srinath Shankar <srinath@databricks.com>
Closes#15493 from srinathshankar/crosspython.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves the window function frame boundary API to make it more obvious to read and to use. The two high level changes are:
1. Create Window.currentRow, Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.unboundedFollowing to indicate the special values in frame boundaries. These methods map to the special integral values so we are not breaking backward compatibility here. This change makes the frame boundaries more self-evident (instead of Long.MinValue, it becomes Window.unboundedPreceding).
2. In Python, for any value less than or equal to JVM's Long.MinValue, treat it as Window.unboundedPreceding. For any value larger than or equal to JVM's Long.MaxValue, treat it as Window.unboundedFollowing. Before this change, if the user specifies any value that is less than Long.MinValue but not -sys.maxsize (e.g. -sys.maxsize + 1), the number we pass over to the JVM would overflow, resulting in a frame that does not make sense.
Code example required to specify a frame before this patch:
```
Window.rowsBetween(-Long.MinValue, 0)
```
While the above code should still work, the new way is more obvious to read:
```
Window.rowsBetween(Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.currentRow)
```
## How was this patch tested?
- Updated DataFrameWindowSuite (for Scala/Java)
- Updated test_window_functions_cumulative_sum (for Python)
- Renamed DataFrameWindowSuite DataFrameWindowFunctionsSuite to better reflect its purpose
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#15438 from rxin/SPARK-17845.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark, the invalid join type will not throw error for the following join:
```df1.join(df2, how='not-a-valid-join-type')```
The signature of the join is:
```def join(self, other, on=None, how=None):```
The existing code completely ignores the `how` parameter when `on` is `None`. This patch will process the arguments passed to join and pass in to JVM Spark SQL Analyzer, which will validate the join type passed.
## How was this patch tested?
Used manual and existing test suites.
Author: Bijay Pathak <bkpathak@mtu.edu>
Closes#15409 from bkpathak/SPARK-14761.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgraded to a newer version of Pyrolite which supports serialization of a BinaryType StructField for PySpark.SQL
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test which fails with a raised ValueError when using the previous version of Pyrolite 4.9 and Python3
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#15386 from BryanCutler/pyrolite-upgrade-SPARK-17808.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When I was creating the example code for SPARK-10496, I realized it was pretty convoluted to define the frame boundaries for window functions when there is no partition column or ordering column. The reason is that we don't provide a way to create a WindowSpec directly with the frame boundaries. We can trivially improve this by adding rowsBetween and rangeBetween to Window object.
As an example, to compute cumulative sum using the natural ordering, before this pr:
```
df.select('key, sum("value").over(Window.partitionBy(lit(1)).rowsBetween(Long.MinValue, 0)))
```
After this pr:
```
df.select('key, sum("value").over(Window.rowsBetween(Long.MinValue, 0)))
```
Note that you could argue there is no point specifying a window frame without partitionBy/orderBy -- but it is strange that only rowsBetween and rangeBetween are not the only two APIs not available.
This also fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17656 (removing _root_.scala).
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to compute cumulative sum in DataFrameWindowSuite for Scala/Java and tests.py for Python.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#15412 from rxin/SPARK-17844.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If given a list of paths, `pyspark.sql.readwriter.text` will attempt to use an undefined variable `paths`. This change checks if the param `paths` is a basestring and then converts it to a list, so that the same variable `paths` can be used for both cases
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test for reading list of files
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#15379 from BryanCutler/sql-readtext-paths-SPARK-17805.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In optimizer, we try to evaluate the condition to see whether it's nullable or not, but some expressions are not evaluable, we should check that before evaluate it.
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#15103 from davies/udf_join.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark, `df.take(1)` runs a single-stage job which computes only one partition of the DataFrame, while `df.limit(1).collect()` computes all partitions and runs a two-stage job. This difference in performance is confusing.
The reason why `limit(1).collect()` is so much slower is that `collect()` internally maps to `df.rdd.<some-pyspark-conversions>.toLocalIterator`, which causes Spark SQL to build a query where a global limit appears in the middle of the plan; this, in turn, ends up being executed inefficiently because limits in the middle of plans are now implemented by repartitioning to a single task rather than by running a `take()` job on the driver (this was done in #7334, a patch which was a prerequisite to allowing partition-local limits to be pushed beneath unions, etc.).
In order to fix this performance problem I think that we should generalize the fix from SPARK-10731 / #8876 so that `DataFrame.collect()` also delegates to the Scala implementation and shares the same performance properties. This patch modifies `DataFrame.collect()` to first collect all results to the driver and then pass them to Python, allowing this query to be planned using Spark's `CollectLimit` optimizations.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a regression test in `sql/tests.py` which asserts that the expected number of jobs, stages, and tasks are run for both queries.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#15068 from JoshRosen/pyspark-collect-limit.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When there is any Python UDF in the Project between Sort and Limit, it will be collected into TakeOrderedAndProjectExec, ExtractPythonUDFs failed to pull the Python UDFs out because QueryPlan.expressions does not include the expression inside Option[Seq[Expression]].
Ideally, we should fix the `QueryPlan.expressions`, but tried with no luck (it always run into infinite loop). In PR, I changed the TakeOrderedAndProjectExec to no use Option[Seq[Expression]] to workaround it. cc JoshRosen
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression test.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#15030 from davies/all_expr.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Method `SQLContext.parseDataType(dataTypeString: String)` could be removed, we should use `SparkSession.parseDataType(dataTypeString: String)` instead.
This require updating PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases.
Author: jiangxingbo <jiangxb1987@gmail.com>
Closes#14790 from jiangxb1987/parseDataType.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`PySpark` loses `microsecond` precision for some corner cases during converting `Timestamp` into `Long`. For example, for the following `datetime.max` value should be converted a value whose last 6 digits are '999999'. This PR improves the logic not to lose precision for all cases.
**Corner case**
```python
>>> datetime.datetime.max
datetime.datetime(9999, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59, 999999)
```
**Before**
```python
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> from pyspark.sql import Row
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import StructType, StructField, TimestampType
>>> schema = StructType([StructField("dt", TimestampType(), False)])
>>> [schema.toInternal(row) for row in [{"dt": datetime.max}]]
[(253402329600000000,)]
```
**After**
```python
>>> [schema.toInternal(row) for row in [{"dt": datetime.max}]]
[(253402329599999999,)]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins test with a new test case.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14631 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-17035.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In 2.0, we verify the data type against schema for every row for safety, but with performance cost, this PR make it optional.
When we verify the data type for StructType, it does not support all the types we support in infer schema (for example, dict), this PR fix that to make them consistent.
For Row object which is created using named arguments, the order of fields are sorted by name, they may be not different than the order in provided schema, this PR fix that by ignore the order of fields in this case.
## How was this patch tested?
Created regression tests for them.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#14469 from davies/py_dict.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are two related bugs of Python-only UDTs. Because the test case of second one needs the first fix too. I put them into one PR. If it is not appropriate, please let me know.
### First bug: When MapObjects works on Python-only UDTs
`RowEncoder` will use `PythonUserDefinedType.sqlType` for its deserializer expression. If the sql type is `ArrayType`, we will have `MapObjects` working on it. But `MapObjects` doesn't consider `PythonUserDefinedType` as its input data type. It causes error like:
import pyspark.sql.group
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql.types import *
schema = StructType().add("key", LongType()).add("val", PythonOnlyUDT())
df = spark.createDataFrame([(i % 3, PythonOnlyPoint(float(i), float(i))) for i in range(10)], schema=schema)
df.show()
File "/home/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 312, in get_return_value py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o36.showString.
: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error while decoding: scala.MatchError: org.apache.spark.sql.types.PythonUserDefinedTypef4ceede8 (of class org.apache.spark.sql.types.PythonUserDefinedType)
...
### Second bug: When Python-only UDTs is the element type of ArrayType
import pyspark.sql.group
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql.types import *
schema = StructType().add("key", LongType()).add("val", ArrayType(PythonOnlyUDT()))
df = spark.createDataFrame([(i % 3, [PythonOnlyPoint(float(i), float(i))]) for i in range(10)], schema=schema)
df.show()
## How was this patch tested?
PySpark's sql tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#13778 from viirya/fix-pyudt.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Scala UDT will bypass all the null and will not pass them into serialize() and deserialize() of UDT, this PR update the Python UDT to do this as well.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13878 from davies/udt_null.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we create a SparkSession at the Python side, it is possible that a SparkContext has been created. For this case, we need to set configs of the SparkSession builder to the Scala SparkContext's SparkConf (we need to do so because conf changes on a active Python SparkContext will not be propagated to the JVM side). Otherwise, we may create a wrong SparkSession (e.g. Hive support is not enabled even if enableHiveSupport is called).
## How was this patch tested?
New tests and manual tests.
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#13931 from yhuai/SPARK-16224.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Fix tests regarding show functions functionality
- Revert `catalog.ListFunctions` and `SHOW FUNCTIONS` to return to `Spark 1.X` functionality.
Cherry picked changes from this PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413/files
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: Bill Chambers <bill@databricks.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <wchambers@ischool.berkeley.edu>
Closes#13916 from anabranch/master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fix the bug when Python UDF is used in explode (generator), GenerateExec requires that all the attributes in expressions should be resolvable from children when creating, we should replace the children first, then replace it's expressions.
```
>>> df.select(explode(f(*df))).show()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 286, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, truncate))
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 933, in __call__
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 63, in deco
return f(*a, **kw)
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 312, in get_return_value
py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o52.showString.
: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: makeCopy, tree:
Generate explode(<lambda>(_1#0L)), false, false, [col#15L]
+- Scan ExistingRDD[_1#0L]
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.makeCopy(TreeNode.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:45)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.transformExpressionsDown(QueryPlan.scala:177)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.transformExpressions(QueryPlan.scala:144)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$python$ExtractPythonUDFs$$extract(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:153)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:114)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:113)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:301)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:301)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:300)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$4.apply(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$4.apply(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$5.apply(TreeNode.scala:321)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformChildren(TreeNode.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.apply(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:113)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.apply(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:93)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$prepareForExecution$1.apply(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$prepareForExecution$1.apply(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized$class.foldLeft(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:124)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foldLeft(List.scala:84)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.prepareForExecution(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.executedPlan$lzycompute(QueryExecution.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.executedPlan(QueryExecution.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.withTypedCallback(Dataset.scala:2557)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.head(Dataset.scala:1923)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.take(Dataset.scala:2138)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.showString(Dataset.scala:239)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at py4j.reflection.MethodInvoker.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:237)
at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.invoke(ReflectionEngine.java:357)
at py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:280)
at py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:128)
at py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
at py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:211)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:423)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(TreeNode.scala:413)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(TreeNode.scala:413)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:412)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:49)
... 42 more
Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: pythonUDF0#20
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$3.apply(TreeNode.scala:279)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$3.apply(TreeNode.scala:279)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:278)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$5.apply(TreeNode.scala:321)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformChildren(TreeNode.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transform(TreeNode.scala:268)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$.bindReference(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.GenerateExec.<init>(GenerateExec.scala:63)
... 52 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Couldn't find pythonUDF0#20 in [_1#0L]
at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:94)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:49)
... 67 more
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13883 from davies/udf_in_generate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allows us to create a Row without any fields.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test for empty row and udf without arguments.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13812 from davies/no_argus.
Fix the bug for Python UDF that does not have any arguments.
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies.liu@gmail.com>
Closes#13793 from davies/fix_no_arguments.
(cherry picked from commit abe36c53d1)
Signed-off-by: Davies Liu <davies.liu@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After we move the ExtractPythonUDF rule into physical plan, Python UDF can't work on top of aggregate anymore, because they can't be evaluated before aggregate, should be evaluated after aggregate. This PR add another rule to extract these kind of Python UDF from logical aggregate, create a Project on top of Aggregate.
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests. The plan of added test query looks like this:
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [<lambda>('k, 's) AS t#26]
+- Aggregate [<lambda>(key#5L)], [<lambda>(key#5L) AS k#17, sum(cast(<lambda>(value#6) as bigint)) AS s#22L]
+- LogicalRDD [key#5L, value#6]
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
t: int
Project [<lambda>(k#17, s#22L) AS t#26]
+- Aggregate [<lambda>(key#5L)], [<lambda>(key#5L) AS k#17, sum(cast(<lambda>(value#6) as bigint)) AS s#22L]
+- LogicalRDD [key#5L, value#6]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [<lambda>(agg#29, agg#30L) AS t#26]
+- Aggregate [<lambda>(key#5L)], [<lambda>(key#5L) AS agg#29, sum(cast(<lambda>(value#6) as bigint)) AS agg#30L]
+- LogicalRDD [key#5L, value#6]
== Physical Plan ==
*Project [pythonUDF0#37 AS t#26]
+- BatchEvalPython [<lambda>(agg#29, agg#30L)], [agg#29, agg#30L, pythonUDF0#37]
+- *HashAggregate(key=[<lambda>(key#5L)#31], functions=[sum(cast(<lambda>(value#6) as bigint))], output=[agg#29,agg#30L])
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(<lambda>(key#5L)#31, 200)
+- *HashAggregate(key=[pythonUDF0#34 AS <lambda>(key#5L)#31], functions=[partial_sum(cast(pythonUDF1#35 as bigint))], output=[<lambda>(key#5L)#31,sum#33L])
+- BatchEvalPython [<lambda>(key#5L), <lambda>(value#6)], [key#5L, value#6, pythonUDF0#34, pythonUDF1#35]
+- Scan ExistingRDD[key#5L,value#6]
```
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13682 from davies/fix_py_udf.
Renamed for simplicity, so that its obvious that its related to streaming.
Existing unit tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#13673 from tdas/SPARK-15953.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the DataFrameReader/Writer has method that are needed for streaming and non-streaming DFs. This is quite awkward because each method in them through runtime exception for one case or the other. So rather having half the methods throw runtime exceptions, its just better to have a different reader/writer API for streams.
- [x] Python API!!
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests + two sets of unit tests for DataFrameReader/Writer and DataStreamReader/Writer.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#13653 from tdas/SPARK-15933.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkSession.catalog.listFunctions currently returns all functions, including the list of built-in functions. This makes the method not as useful because anytime it is run the result set contains over 100 built-in functions.
## How was this patch tested?
CatalogSuite
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Closes#13413 from techaddict/SPARK-15663.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently structured streaming only supports append output mode. This PR adds the following.
- Added support for Complete output mode in the internal state store, analyzer and planner.
- Added public API in Scala and Python for users to specify output mode
- Added checks for unsupported combinations of output mode and DF operations
- Plans with no aggregation should support only Append mode
- Plans with aggregation should support only Update and Complete modes
- Default output mode is Append mode (**Question: should we change this to automatically set to Complete mode when there is aggregation?**)
- Added support for Complete output mode in Memory Sink. So Memory Sink internally supports append and complete, update. But from public API only Complete and Append output modes are supported.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in various test suites
- StreamingAggregationSuite: tests for complete mode
- MemorySinkSuite: tests for checking behavior in Append and Complete modes.
- UnsupportedOperationSuite: tests for checking unsupported combinations of DF ops and output modes
- DataFrameReaderWriterSuite: tests for checking that output mode cannot be called on static DFs
- Python doc test and existing unit tests modified to call write.outputMode.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#13286 from tdas/complete-mode.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PySpark SQL `test_column_name_with_non_ascii` wants to test non-ascii column name. But it doesn't actually test it. We need to construct an unicode explicitly using `unicode` under Python 2.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#13134 from viirya/correct-non-ascii-colname-pytest.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update the unit test code, examples, and documents to remove calls to deprecated method `dataset.registerTempTable`.
## How was this patch tested?
This PR only changes the unit test code, examples, and comments. It should be safe.
This is a follow up of PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945 which was merged.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#13098 from clockfly/spark-15171-remove-deprecation.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**createDataFrame** returns inconsistent types for column names.
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import StructType, StructField, StringType
>>> schema = StructType([StructField(u"col", StringType())])
>>> df1 = spark.createDataFrame([("a",)], schema)
>>> df1.columns # "col" is str
['col']
>>> df2 = spark.createDataFrame([("a",)], [u"col"])
>>> df2.columns # "col" is unicode
[u'col']
```
The reason is only **StructField** has the following code.
```
if not isinstance(name, str):
name = name.encode('utf-8')
```
This PR adds the same logic into **createDataFrame** for consistency.
```
if isinstance(schema, list):
schema = [x.encode('utf-8') if not isinstance(x, str) else x for x in schema]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins test (with new python doctest)
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13097 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15244.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use SparkSession instead of SQLContext in Python TestSuites
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Closes#13044 from techaddict/SPARK-15037-python.
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support partitioning in the file stream sink. This is implemented using a new, but simpler code path for writing parquet files - both unpartitioned and partitioned. This new code path does not use Output Committers, as we will eventually write the file names to the metadata log for "committing" them.
This patch duplicates < 100 LOC from the WriterContainer. But its far simpler that WriterContainer as it does not involve output committing. In addition, it introduces the new APIs in FileFormat and OutputWriterFactory in an attempt to simplify the APIs (not have Job in the `FileFormat` API, not have bucket and other stuff in the `OutputWriterFactory.newInstance()` ).
# Tests
- New unit tests to test the FileStreamSinkWriter for partitioned and unpartitioned files
- New unit test to partially test the FileStreamSink for partitioned files (does not test recovery of partition column data, as that requires change in the StreamFileCatalog, future PR).
- Updated FileStressSuite to test number of records read from partitioned output files.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#12409 from tdas/streaming-partitioned-parquet.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Remove all the `spark.setConf` etc. Just expose `spark.conf`
2. Make `spark.conf` take in things set in the core `SparkConf` as well, otherwise users may get confused
This was done for both the Python and Scala APIs.
## How was this patch tested?
`SQLConfSuite`, python tests.
This one fixes the failed tests in #12787Closes#12787
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#12798 from yhuai/conf-api.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Addresses comments in #12765.
## How was this patch tested?
Python tests.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#12784 from andrewor14/python-followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds Python APIs for:
- `ContinuousQueryManager`
- `ContinuousQueryException`
The `ContinuousQueryException` is a very basic wrapper, it doesn't provide the functionality that the Scala side provides, but it follows the same pattern for `AnalysisException`.
For `ContinuousQueryManager`, all APIs are provided except for registering listeners.
This PR also attempts to fix test flakiness by stopping all active streams just before tests.
## How was this patch tested?
Python Doc tests and unit tests
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#12673 from brkyvz/pyspark-cqm.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```
Welcome to
____ __
/ __/__ ___ _____/ /__
_\ \/ _ \/ _ `/ __/ '_/
/__ / .__/\_,_/_/ /_/\_\ version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT
/_/
Using Python version 2.7.5 (default, Mar 9 2014 22:15:05)
SparkSession available as 'spark'.
>>> spark
<pyspark.sql.session.SparkSession object at 0x101f3bfd0>
>>> spark.sql("SHOW TABLES").show()
...
+---------+-----------+
|tableName|isTemporary|
+---------+-----------+
| src| false|
+---------+-----------+
>>> spark.range(1, 10, 2).show()
+---+
| id|
+---+
| 1|
| 3|
| 5|
| 7|
| 9|
+---+
```
**Note**: This API is NOT complete in its current state. In particular, for now I left out the `conf` and `catalog` APIs, which were added later in Scala. These will be added later before 2.0.
## How was this patch tested?
Python tests.
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#12746 from andrewor14/python-spark-session.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Python, the `option` and `options` method of `DataFrameReader` and `DataFrameWriter` were sending the string "None" instead of `null` when passed `None`, therefore making it impossible to send an actual `null`. This fixes that problem.
This is based on #11305 from mathieulongtin.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test to readwriter.py.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Author: mathieu longtin <mathieu.longtin@nuance.com>
Closes#12494 from viirya/py-df-none-option.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expand the possible ways to interact with the contents of a `pyspark.sql.types.StructType` instance.
- Iterating a `StructType` will iterate its fields
- `[field.name for field in my_structtype]`
- Indexing with a string will return a field by name
- `my_structtype['my_field_name']`
- Indexing with an integer will return a field by position
- `my_structtype[0]`
- Indexing with a slice will return a new `StructType` with just the chosen fields:
- `my_structtype[1:3]`
- The length is the number of fields (should also provide "truthiness" for free)
- `len(my_structtype) == 2`
## How was this patch tested?
Extended the unit test coverage in the accompanying `tests.py`.
Author: Sheamus K. Parkes <shea.parkes@milliman.com>
Closes#12251 from skparkes/pyspark-structtype-enhance.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch provides a first cut of python APIs for structured streaming. This PR provides the new classes:
- ContinuousQuery
- Trigger
- ProcessingTime
in pyspark under `pyspark.sql.streaming`.
In addition, it contains the new methods added under:
- `DataFrameWriter`
a) `startStream`
b) `trigger`
c) `queryName`
- `DataFrameReader`
a) `stream`
- `DataFrame`
a) `isStreaming`
This PR doesn't contain all methods exposed for `ContinuousQuery`, for example:
- `exception`
- `sourceStatuses`
- `sinkStatus`
They may be added in a follow up.
This PR also contains some very minor doc fixes in the Scala side.
## How was this patch tested?
Python doc tests
TODO:
- [ ] verify Python docs look good
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Author: Burak Yavuz <burak@databricks.com>
Closes#12320 from brkyvz/stream-python.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change unpersist blocking parameter default value to match Scala
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests, manual tests
jkbradley davies
Author: felixcheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#12507 from felixcheung/pyunpersist.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we extract Python UDFs into a special logical plan EvaluatePython in analyzer, But EvaluatePython is not part of catalyst, many rules have no knowledge of it , which will break many things (for example, filter push down or column pruning).
We should treat Python UDFs as normal expressions, until we want to evaluate in physical plan, we could extract them in end of optimizer, or physical plan.
This PR extract Python UDFs in physical plan.
Closes#10935
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12127 from davies/py_udf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR support multiple Python UDFs within single batch, also improve the performance.
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import IntegerType
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("double", lambda x: x * 2, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("add", lambda x, y: x + y, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.sql("SELECT double(add(1, 2)), add(double(2), 1)").explain(True)
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [unresolvedalias('double('add(1, 2)), None),unresolvedalias('add('double(2), 1), None)]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
double(add(1, 2)): int, add(double(2), 1): int
Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17,pythonUDF0#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Using the following script to benchmark 1, 2 and 3 udfs,
```
df = sqlContext.range(1, 1 << 23, 1, 4)
double = F.udf(lambda x: x * 2, LongType())
print df.select(double(df.id)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1), double(df.id + 2)).count()
```
Here is the results:
N | Before | After | speed up
---- |------------ | -------------|------
1 | 22 s | 7 s | 3.1X
2 | 38 s | 13 s | 2.9X
3 | 58 s | 16 s | 3.6X
This benchmark ran locally with 4 CPUs. For 3 UDFs, it launched 12 Python before before this patch, 4 process after this patch. After this patch, it will use less memory for multiple UDFs than before (less buffering).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12057 from davies/multi_udfs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR brings the support for chained Python UDFs, for example
```sql
select udf1(udf2(a))
select udf1(udf2(a) + 3)
select udf1(udf2(a) + udf3(b))
```
Also directly chained unary Python UDFs are put in single batch of Python UDFs, others may require multiple batches.
For example,
```python
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF#10 AS double(double(1))#9]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(double(1)), [pythonUDF#10]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1) + double(2))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF#19 AS double((double(1) + double(2)))#16]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double((pythonUDF#17 + pythonUDF#18)), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18,pythonUDF#19]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(2), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(1), [pythonUDF#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
TODO: will support multiple unrelated Python UDFs in one batch (another PR).
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests for chained UDFs.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12014 from davies/py_udfs.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current ANTLR3 parser is quite complex to maintain and suffers from code blow-ups. This PR introduces a new parser that is based on ANTLR4.
This parser is based on the [Presto's SQL parser](https://github.com/facebook/presto/blob/master/presto-parser/src/main/antlr4/com/facebook/presto/sql/parser/SqlBase.g4). The current implementation can parse and create Catalyst and SQL plans. Large parts of the HiveQl DDL and some of the DML functionality is currently missing, the plan is to add this in follow-up PRs.
This PR is a work in progress, and work needs to be done in the following area's:
- [x] Error handling should be improved.
- [x] Documentation should be improved.
- [x] Multi-Insert needs to be tested.
- [ ] Naming and package locations.
### How was this patch tested?
Catalyst and SQL unit tests.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#11557 from hvanhovell/ngParser.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
unionAll has been deprecated in SPARK-14088.
## How was this patch tested?
Should be covered by all existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#11946 from rxin/SPARK-14142.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves the `createDataFrame` method to make it also accept datatype string, then users can convert python RDD to DataFrame easily, for example, `df = rdd.toDF("a: int, b: string")`.
It also supports flat schema so users can convert an RDD of int to DataFrame directly, we will automatically wrap int to row for users.
If schema is given, now we checks if the real data matches the given schema, and throw error if it doesn't.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests in `test.py` and doc test in `types.py`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11444 from cloud-fan/pyrdd.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove `map`, `flatMap`, `mapPartitions` from python DataFrame, to prepare for Dataset API in the future.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11445 from cloud-fan/python-clean.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Scala DataFrameStatFunctions: Added version of approxQuantile taking a List instead of an Array, for Python compatbility
* Python DataFrame and DataFrameStatFunctions: Added approxQuantile
## How was this patch tested?
* unit test in sql/tests.py
Documentation was copied from the existing approxQuantile exactly.
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#11356 from jkbradley/approx-quantile-python.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds equality operators to UDT classes so that they can be correctly tested for dataType equality during union operations.
This was previously causing `"AnalysisException: u"unresolved operator 'Union;""` when trying to unionAll two dataframes with UDT columns as below.
```
from pyspark.sql.tests import PythonOnlyPoint, PythonOnlyUDT
from pyspark.sql import types
schema = types.StructType([types.StructField("point", PythonOnlyUDT(), True)])
a = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(1.0, 2.0)]], schema)
b = sqlCtx.createDataFrame([[PythonOnlyPoint(3.0, 4.0)]], schema)
c = a.unionAll(b)
```
## How was the this patch tested?
Tested using two unit tests in sql/test.py and the DataFrameSuite.
Additional information here : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13410
Author: Franklyn D'souza <franklynd@gmail.com>
Closes#11279 from damnMeddlingKid/udt-union-all.
This PR adds the ability to specify the ```ignoreNulls``` option to the functions dsl, e.g:
```df.select($"id", last($"value", ignoreNulls = true).over(Window.partitionBy($"id").orderBy($"other"))```
This PR is some where between a bug fix (see the JIRA) and a new feature. I am not sure if we should backport to 1.6.
cc yhuai
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10957 from hvanhovell/SPARK-13049.
