### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Based on a follow up comment in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28123, where we can coalesce buckets for shuffled hash join as well. The note here is we only coalesce the buckets from shuffled hash join stream side (i.e. the side not building hash map), so we don't need to worry about OOM when coalescing multiple buckets in one task for building hash map.
> If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
Refactor existing physical plan rule `CoalesceBucketsInSortMergeJoin` to `CoalesceBucketsInJoin`, for covering shuffled hash join as well.
Refactor existing unit test `CoalesceBucketsInSortMergeJoinSuite` to `CoalesceBucketsInJoinSuite`, for covering shuffled hash join as well.
### Why are the changes needed?
Avoid shuffle for joining different bucketed tables, is also useful for shuffled hash join. In production, we are seeing users to use shuffled hash join to join bucketed tables (set `spark.sql.join.preferSortMergeJoin`=false, to avoid sort), and this can help avoid shuffle if number of buckets are not same.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests in `CoalesceBucketsInJoinSuite` for verifying shuffled hash join physical plan.
### Performance number per request from maropu
I was looking at TPCDS per suggestion from maropu. But I found most of queries from TPCDS are doing aggregate, and only several ones are doing join. None of input tables are bucketed. So I took the approach to test a modified version of `TPCDS q93` as
```
SELECT ss_ticket_number, sr_ticket_number
FROM store_sales
JOIN store_returns
ON ss_ticket_number = sr_ticket_number
```
And make `store_sales` and `store_returns` to be bucketed tables.
Physical query plan without coalesce:
```
ShuffledHashJoin [ss_ticket_number#109L], [sr_ticket_number#120L], Inner, BuildLeft
:- Exchange hashpartitioning(ss_ticket_number#109L, 4), true, [id=#67]
: +- *(1) Project [ss_ticket_number#109L]
: +- *(1) Filter isnotnull(ss_ticket_number#109L)
: +- *(1) ColumnarToRow
: +- FileScan parquet default.store_sales[ss_ticket_number#109L] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(ss_ticket_number#109L)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/Users/chengsu/spark/spark-warehouse/store_sales], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(ss_ticket_number)], ReadSchema: struct<ss_ticket_number:bigint>, SelectedBucketsCount: 2 out of 2
+- *(2) Project [sr_returned_date_sk#111L, sr_return_time_sk#112L, sr_item_sk#113L, sr_customer_sk#114L, sr_cdemo_sk#115L, sr_hdemo_sk#116L, sr_addr_sk#117L, sr_store_sk#118L, sr_reason_sk#119L, sr_ticket_number#120L, sr_return_quantity#121L, sr_return_amt#122, sr_return_tax#123, sr_return_amt_inc_tax#124, sr_fee#125, sr_return_ship_cost#126, sr_refunded_cash#127, sr_reversed_charge#128, sr_store_credit#129, sr_net_loss#130]
+- *(2) Filter isnotnull(sr_ticket_number#120L)
+- *(2) ColumnarToRow
+- FileScan parquet default.store_returns[sr_returned_date_sk#111L,sr_return_time_sk#112L,sr_item_sk#113L,sr_customer_sk#114L,sr_cdemo_sk#115L,sr_hdemo_sk#116L,sr_addr_sk#117L,sr_store_sk#118L,sr_reason_sk#119L,sr_ticket_number#120L,sr_return_quantity#121L,sr_return_amt#122,sr_return_tax#123,sr_return_amt_inc_tax#124,sr_fee#125,sr_return_ship_cost#126,sr_refunded_cash#127,sr_reversed_charge#128,sr_store_credit#129,sr_net_loss#130] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(sr_ticket_number#120L)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/Users/chengsu/spark/spark-warehouse/store_returns], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(sr_ticket_number)], ReadSchema: struct<sr_returned_date_sk:bigint,sr_return_time_sk:bigint,sr_item_sk:bigint,sr_customer_sk:bigin..., SelectedBucketsCount: 4 out of 4
```
Physical query plan with coalesce:
```
ShuffledHashJoin [ss_ticket_number#109L], [sr_ticket_number#120L], Inner, BuildLeft
:- *(1) Project [ss_ticket_number#109L]
: +- *(1) Filter isnotnull(ss_ticket_number#109L)
: +- *(1) ColumnarToRow
: +- FileScan parquet default.store_sales[ss_ticket_number#109L] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(ss_ticket_number#109L)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/Users/chengsu/spark/spark-warehouse/store_sales], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(ss_ticket_number)], ReadSchema: struct<ss_ticket_number:bigint>, SelectedBucketsCount: 2 out of 2
+- *(2) Project [sr_returned_date_sk#111L, sr_return_time_sk#112L, sr_item_sk#113L, sr_customer_sk#114L, sr_cdemo_sk#115L, sr_hdemo_sk#116L, sr_addr_sk#117L, sr_store_sk#118L, sr_reason_sk#119L, sr_ticket_number#120L, sr_return_quantity#121L, sr_return_amt#122, sr_return_tax#123, sr_return_amt_inc_tax#124, sr_fee#125, sr_return_ship_cost#126, sr_refunded_cash#127, sr_reversed_charge#128, sr_store_credit#129, sr_net_loss#130]
+- *(2) Filter isnotnull(sr_ticket_number#120L)
+- *(2) ColumnarToRow
+- FileScan parquet default.store_returns[sr_returned_date_sk#111L,sr_return_time_sk#112L,sr_item_sk#113L,sr_customer_sk#114L,sr_cdemo_sk#115L,sr_hdemo_sk#116L,sr_addr_sk#117L,sr_store_sk#118L,sr_reason_sk#119L,sr_ticket_number#120L,sr_return_quantity#121L,sr_return_amt#122,sr_return_tax#123,sr_return_amt_inc_tax#124,sr_fee#125,sr_return_ship_cost#126,sr_refunded_cash#127,sr_reversed_charge#128,sr_store_credit#129,sr_net_loss#130] Batched: true, DataFilters: [isnotnull(sr_ticket_number#120L)], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/Users/chengsu/spark/spark-warehouse/store_returns], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [IsNotNull(sr_ticket_number)], ReadSchema: struct<sr_returned_date_sk:bigint,sr_return_time_sk:bigint,sr_item_sk:bigint,sr_customer_sk:bigin..., SelectedBucketsCount: 4 out of 4 (Coalesced to 2)
```
Run time improvement as 50% of wall clock time:
```
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_181-b13 on Mac OS X 10.15.4
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9980HK CPU 2.40GHz
shuffle hash join: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
shuffle hash join coalesce bucket off 1541 1664 106 1.9 535.1 1.0X
shuffle hash join coalesce bucket on 1060 1169 81 2.7 368.1 1.5X
```
Closes#29079 from c21/split-bucket.
Authored-by: Cheng Su <chengsu@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix `CaseInsensitiveMap` to be deterministic for addition.
### Why are the changes needed?
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.CaseInsensitiveMap
var m = CaseInsensitiveMap(Map.empty[String, String])
Seq(("paTh", "1"), ("PATH", "2"), ("Path", "3"), ("patH", "4"), ("path", "5")).foreach { kv =>
m = (m + kv).asInstanceOf[CaseInsensitiveMap[String]]
println(m.get("path"))
}
```
**BEFORE**
```
Some(1)
Some(2)
Some(3)
Some(4)
Some(1)
```
**AFTER**
```
Some(1)
Some(2)
Some(3)
Some(4)
Some(5)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, but this is a bug fix on non-deterministic behavior.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the newly added test case.
Closes#29172 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-32377.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current implement of regexp_extract will throws a unprocessed exception show below:
SELECT regexp_extract('1a 2b 14m', 'd+' -1)
```
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: No group -1
java.util.regex.Matcher.group(Matcher.java:538)
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.RegExpExtract.nullSafeEval(regexpExpressions.scala:455)
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.TernaryExpression.eval(Expression.scala:704)
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConstantFolding$$anonfun$apply$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.applyOrElse(expressions.scala:52)
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConstantFolding$$anonfun$apply$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.applyOrElse(expressions.scala:45)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix a bug `java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: No group -1`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
new UT
Closes#29161 from beliefer/regexp_extract-group-not-allow-less-than-zero.
Authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the `BroadcastHashJoinExec`'s `outputPartitioning` only uses the streamed side's `outputPartitioning`. However, if the join type of `BroadcastHashJoinExec` is an inner-like join, the build side's info (the join keys) can be added to `BroadcastHashJoinExec`'s `outputPartitioning`.
For example,
```Scala
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold", "500")
val t1 = (0 until 100).map(i => (i % 5, i % 13)).toDF("i1", "j1")
val t2 = (0 until 100).map(i => (i % 5, i % 13)).toDF("i2", "j2")
val t3 = (0 until 20).map(i => (i % 7, i % 11)).toDF("i3", "j3")
val t4 = (0 until 100).map(i => (i % 5, i % 13)).toDF("i4", "j4")
// join1 is a sort merge join.
val join1 = t1.join(t2, t1("i1") === t2("i2"))
// join2 is a broadcast join where t3 is broadcasted.
val join2 = join1.join(t3, join1("i1") === t3("i3"))
// Join on the column from the broadcasted side (i3).
val join3 = join2.join(t4, join2("i3") === t4("i4"))
join3.explain
```
You see that `Exchange hashpartitioning(i2#103, 200)` is introduced because there is no output partitioning info from the build side.
```
== Physical Plan ==
*(6) SortMergeJoin [i3#29], [i4#40], Inner
:- *(4) Sort [i3#29 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i3#29, 200), true, [id=#55]
: +- *(3) BroadcastHashJoin [i1#7], [i3#29], Inner, BuildRight
: :- *(3) SortMergeJoin [i1#7], [i2#18], Inner
: : :- *(1) Sort [i1#7 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: : : +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i1#7, 200), true, [id=#28]
: : : +- LocalTableScan [i1#7, j1#8]
: : +- *(2) Sort [i2#18 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: : +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i2#18, 200), true, [id=#29]
: : +- LocalTableScan [i2#18, j2#19]
: +- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as bigint))), [id=#34]
: +- LocalTableScan [i3#29, j3#30]
+- *(5) Sort [i4#40 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(i4#40, 200), true, [id=#39]
+- LocalTableScan [i4#40, j4#41]
```
This PR proposes to introduce output partitioning for the build side for `BroadcastHashJoinExec` if the streamed side has a `HashPartitioning` or a collection of `HashPartitioning`s.
There is a new internal config `spark.sql.execution.broadcastHashJoin.outputPartitioningExpandLimit`, which can limit the number of partitioning a `HashPartitioning` can expand to. It can be set to "0" to disable this feature.
### Why are the changes needed?
To remove unnecessary shuffle.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now the shuffle in the above example can be eliminated:
```
== Physical Plan ==
*(5) SortMergeJoin [i3#108], [i4#119], Inner
:- *(3) Sort [i3#108 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: +- *(3) BroadcastHashJoin [i1#86], [i3#108], Inner, BuildRight
: :- *(3) SortMergeJoin [i1#86], [i2#97], Inner
: : :- *(1) Sort [i1#86 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: : : +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i1#86, 200), true, [id=#120]
: : : +- LocalTableScan [i1#86, j1#87]
: : +- *(2) Sort [i2#97 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
: : +- Exchange hashpartitioning(i2#97, 200), true, [id=#121]
: : +- LocalTableScan [i2#97, j2#98]
: +- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as bigint))), [id=#126]
: +- LocalTableScan [i3#108, j3#109]
+- *(4) Sort [i4#119 ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(i4#119, 200), true, [id=#130]
+- LocalTableScan [i4#119, j4#120]
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Closes#28676 from imback82/broadcast_join_output.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733 and #28805, CNF conversion is used to push down disjunctive predicates through join and partitions pruning.
It's a good improvement, however, converting all the predicates in CNF can lead to a very long result, even with grouping functions over expressions. For example, for the following predicate
```
(p0 = '1' AND p1 = '1') OR (p0 = '2' AND p1 = '2') OR (p0 = '3' AND p1 = '3') OR (p0 = '4' AND p1 = '4') OR (p0 = '5' AND p1 = '5') OR (p0 = '6' AND p1 = '6') OR (p0 = '7' AND p1 = '7') OR (p0 = '8' AND p1 = '8') OR (p0 = '9' AND p1 = '9') OR (p0 = '10' AND p1 = '10') OR (p0 = '11' AND p1 = '11') OR (p0 = '12' AND p1 = '12') OR (p0 = '13' AND p1 = '13') OR (p0 = '14' AND p1 = '14') OR (p0 = '15' AND p1 = '15') OR (p0 = '16' AND p1 = '16') OR (p0 = '17' AND p1 = '17') OR (p0 = '18' AND p1 = '18') OR (p0 = '19' AND p1 = '19') OR (p0 = '20' AND p1 = '20')
```
will be converted into a long query(130K characters) in Hive metastore, and there will be error:
```
javax.jdo.JDOException: Exception thrown when executing query : SELECT DISTINCT 'org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.model.MPartition' AS NUCLEUS_TYPE,A0.CREATE_TIME,A0.LAST_ACCESS_TIME,A0.PART_NAME,A0.PART_ID,A0.PART_NAME AS NUCORDER0 FROM PARTITIONS A0 LEFT OUTER JOIN TBLS B0 ON A0.TBL_ID = B0.TBL_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN DBS C0 ON B0.DB_ID = C0.DB_ID WHERE B0.TBL_NAME = ? AND C0."NAME" = ? AND ((((((A0.PART_NAME LIKE '%/p1=1' ESCAPE '\' ) OR (A0.PART_NAME LIKE '%/p1=2' ESCAPE '\' )) OR (A0.PART_NAME LIKE '%/p1=3' ESCAPE '\' )) OR ((A0.PART_NAME LIKE '%/p1=4' ESCAPE '\' ) O ...
```
Essentially, we just need to traverse predicate and extract the convertible sub-predicates like what we did in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24598. There is no need to maintain the CNF result set.
### Why are the changes needed?
A better implementation for pushing down disjunctive and complex predicates. The pushed down predicates is always equal or shorter than the CNF result.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#29101 from gengliangwang/pushJoin.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to remove redundant sorts before repartition nodes whenever the data is ordered after the repartitioning.
### Why are the changes needed?
It looks like our `EliminateSorts` rule can be extended further to remove sorts before repartition nodes that don't affect the final output ordering. It seems safe to perform the following rewrites:
- `Sort -> Repartition -> Sort -> Scan` as `Sort -> Repartition -> Scan`
- `Sort -> Repartition -> Project -> Sort -> Scan` as `Sort -> Repartition -> Project -> Scan`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
More test cases.
Closes#29089 from aokolnychyi/spark-32276.
Authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to fix a bug of distinct FIRST/LAST aggregates in v2.4.6/v3.0.0/master;
```
scala> sql("SELECT FIRST(DISTINCT v) FROM VALUES 1, 2, 3 t(v)").show()
...
Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot evaluate expression: false#37
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Unevaluable$class.eval(Expression.scala:258)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.AttributeReference.eval(namedExpressions.scala:226)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate.First.ignoreNulls(First.scala:68)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate.First.updateExpressions$lzycompute(First.scala:82)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate.First.updateExpressions(First.scala:81)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.HashAggregateExec$$anonfun$15.apply(HashAggregateExec.scala:268)
```
A root cause of this bug is that the `Aggregation` strategy replaces a foldable boolean `ignoreNullsExpr` expr with a `Unevaluable` expr (`AttributeReference`) for distinct FIRST/LAST aggregate functions. But, this operation cannot be allowed because the `Analyzer` has checked that it must be foldabe;
ffdbbae1d4/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/First.scala (L74-L76)
So, this PR proposes to change a vriable for `IGNORE NULLS` from `Expression` to `Boolean` to avoid the case.
### Why are the changes needed?
Bugfix.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test in `DataFrameAggregateSuite`.
Closes#29143 from maropu/SPARK-32344.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replaced floorDiv to just / in `localRebaseGregorianToJulianDays()` in `spark/sql/catalyst/util/RebaseDateTime.scala`
### Why are the changes needed?
Easier to understand the logic/code and a little more efficiency.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
Proof of concept [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28573/files). The operation `utcCal.getTimeInMillis / MILLIS_PER_DAY` results in an interger value already.
Closes#29008 from Sudhar287/SPARK-31579.
Authored-by: Sudharshann D <sudhar287@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
New `spark.sql.metadataCacheTTLSeconds` option that adds time-to-live cache behaviour to the existing caches in `FileStatusCache` and `SessionCatalog`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently Spark [caches file listing for tables](https://spark.apache.org/docs/2.4.4/sql-data-sources-parquet.html#metadata-refreshing) and requires issuing `REFRESH TABLE` any time the file listing has changed outside of Spark. Unfortunately, simply submitting `REFRESH TABLE` commands could be very cumbersome. Assuming frequently added files, hundreds of tables and dozens of users querying the data (and expecting up-to-date results), manually refreshing metadata for each table is not a solution.
This is a pretty common use-case for streaming ingestion of data, which can be done outside of Spark (with tools like Kafka Connect, etc.).
A similar feature exists in Presto: `hive.file-status-cache-expire-time` can be found [here](https://prestosql.io/docs/current/connector/hive.html#hive-configuration-properties).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it's controlled with the new `spark.sql.metadataCacheTTLSeconds` option.
When it's set to `-1` (by default), the behaviour of caches doesn't change, so it stays _backwards-compatible_.
Otherwise, you can specify a value in seconds, for example `spark.sql.metadataCacheTTLSeconds: 60` means 1-minute cache TTL.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests in:
- FileIndexSuite
- SessionCatalogSuite
Closes#28852 from sap1ens/SPARK-30616-metadata-cache-ttl.
Authored-by: Yaroslav Tkachenko <sapiensy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to support pushed down filters in JSON datasource. The reason of pushing a filter up to `JacksonParser` is to apply the filter as soon as all its attributes become available i.e. converted from JSON field values to desired values according to the schema. This allows to skip parsing of the rest of JSON record and conversions of other values if the filter returns `false`. This can improve performance when pushed filters are highly selective and conversion of JSON string fields to desired values are comparably expensive ( for example, the conversion to `TIMESTAMP` values).
The main idea behind of `JsonFilters` is to group pushdown filters by their references, convert the grouped filters to expressions, and then compile to predicates. The predicates are indexed by schema field positions. Each predicate has a state with reference counter to non-set row fields. As soon as the counter reaches `0`, it can be applied to the row because all its dependencies has been set. Before processing new row, predicate's reference counter is reset to total number of predicate references (dependencies in a row).
The common code shared between `CSVFilters` and `JsonFilters` is moved to the `StructFilters` class and its companion object.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes improve performance on synthetic benchmarks up to **27 times** on JDK 8 and **25** times on JDK 11:
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_242-8u242-b08-0ubuntu3~18.04-b08 on Linux 4.15.0-1044-aws
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 2.50GHz
Filters pushdown: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
w/o filters 25230 25255 22 0.0 252299.6 1.0X
pushdown disabled 25248 25282 33 0.0 252475.6 1.0X
w/ filters 905 911 8 0.1 9047.9 27.9X
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Added new test suites `JsonFiltersSuite` and `JacksonParserSuite`.
- By new end-to-end and case sensitivity tests in `JsonSuite`.
- By `CSVFiltersSuite`, `UnivocityParserSuite` and `CSVSuite`.
- Re-running `CSVBenchmark` and `JsonBenchmark` using Amazon EC2:
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge (spot instance) |
| AMI | ami-06f2f779464715dc5 (ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1) |
| Java | OpenJDK8/11 installed by`sudo add-apt-repository ppa:openjdk-r/ppa` & `sudo apt install openjdk-11-jdk`|
and `./dev/run-benchmarks`:
```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import os
from sparktestsupport.shellutils import run_cmd
benchmarks = [
['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVBenchmark'],
['sql/test', 'org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JsonBenchmark']
]
print('Set SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1')
os.environ['SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES'] = '1'
for b in benchmarks:
print("Run benchmark: %s" % b[1])
run_cmd(['build/sbt', '%s:runMain %s' % (b[0], b[1])])
```
Closes#27366 from MaxGekk/json-filters-pushdown.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the SQL standard command - `SET TIME ZONE` to the current default time zone displacement for the current SQL-session, which is the same as the existing `set spark.sql.session.timeZone=xxx'.
All in all, this PR adds syntax as following,
```
SET TIME ZONE LOCAL;
SET TIME ZONE 'valid time zone'; -- zone offset or region
SET TIME ZONE INTERVAL XXXX; -- xxx must in [-18, + 18] hours, * this range is bigger than ansi [-14, + 14]
```
### Why are the changes needed?
ANSI compliance and supply pure SQL users a way to retrieve all supported TimeZones
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
yes, add new syntax.
### How was this patch tested?
add unit tests.
and locally verified reference doc
Closes#29064 from yaooqinn/SPARK-32272.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR will remove references to these "blacklist" and "whitelist" terms besides the blacklisting feature as a whole, which can be handled in a separate JIRA/PR.
This touches quite a few files, but the changes are straightforward (variable/method/etc. name changes) and most quite self-contained.
### Why are the changes needed?
As per discussion on the Spark dev list, it will be beneficial to remove references to problematic language that can alienate potential community members. One such reference is "blacklist" and "whitelist". While it seems to me that there is some valid debate as to whether these terms have racist origins, the cultural connotations are inescapable in today's world.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
In the test file `HiveQueryFileTest`, a developer has the ability to specify the system property `spark.hive.whitelist` to specify a list of Hive query files that should be tested. This system property has been renamed to `spark.hive.includelist`. The old property has been kept for compatibility, but will log a warning if used. I am open to feedback from others on whether keeping a deprecated property here is unnecessary given that this is just for developers running tests.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should be suitable since no behavior changes are expected as a result of this PR.
Closes#28874 from xkrogen/xkrogen-SPARK-32036-rename-blacklists.
Authored-by: Erik Krogen <ekrogen@linkedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This removes the undocumented and incomplete feature of "stateful aggregation" in continuous mode, which would reduce 1100+ lines of code.
### Why are the changes needed?
The work for the feature had been stopped for over an year, and no one asked/requested for the availability of such feature in community. Current state for the feature is that it only works with `coalesce(1)` which force the query to read and process, and write in "a" task, which doesn't make sense in production.
The remaining code increases the work on DSv2 changes as well - that's why I don't simply propose reverting relevant commits - the code path has been changed due to DSv2 evolution.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Technically no, because it's never documented and can't be used in production in current shape.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#29077 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-31985.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes redundant sorts before repartition nodes with shuffles and repartitionByExpression with deterministic expressions.
### Why are the changes needed?
It looks like our `EliminateSorts` rule can be extended further to remove sorts before repartition nodes that shuffle data as such repartition operations change the ordering and distribution of data. That's why it seems safe to perform the following rewrites:
- `Repartition -> Sort -> Scan` as `Repartition -> Scan`
- `Repartition -> Project -> Sort -> Scan` as `Repartition -> Project -> Scan`
We don't apply this optimization to coalesce as it uses `DefaultPartitionCoalescer` that may preserve the ordering of data if there is no locality info in the parent RDD. At the same time, there is no guarantee that will happen.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
More test cases.
Closes#29089 from aokolnychyi/spark-32276.
Authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Override `canonicalized` to empty the `inputEncoders` for the canonicalized `ScalaUDF`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The following fails on `branch-3.0` currently, not on Apache Spark 3.0.0 release.
```scala
spark.udf.register("key", udf((m: Map[String, String]) => m.keys.head.toInt))
Seq(Map("1" -> "one", "2" -> "two")).toDF("a").createOrReplaceTempView("t")
checkAnswer(sql("SELECT key(a) AS k FROM t GROUP BY key(a)"), Row(1) :: Nil)
[info] org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: expression 't.`a`' is neither present in the group by, nor is it an aggregate function. Add to group by or wrap in first() (or first_value) if you don't care which value you get.;;
[info] Aggregate [UDF(a#6)], [UDF(a#6) AS k#8]
[info] +- SubqueryAlias t
[info] +- Project [value#3 AS a#6]
[info] +- LocalRelation [value#3]
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:49)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.failAnalysis$(CheckAnalysis.scala:48)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:130)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.checkValidAggregateExpression$1(CheckAnalysis.scala:257)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.$anonfun$checkAnalysis$10(CheckAnalysis.scala:259)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.$anonfun$checkAnalysis$10$adapted(CheckAnalysis.scala:259)
[info] at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:62)
[info] at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach$(ResizableArray.scala:55)
[info] at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:49)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.checkValidAggregateExpression$1(CheckAnalysis.scala:259)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.$anonfun$checkAnalysis$10(CheckAnalysis.scala:259)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.$anonfun$checkAnalysis$10$adapted(CheckAnalysis.scala:259)
[info] at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.checkValidAggregateExpression$1(CheckAnalysis.scala:259)
...
```
We use the rule`ResolveEncodersInUDF` to resolve `inputEncoders` and the original`ScalaUDF` instance will be updated to a new `ScalaUDF` instance with the resolved encoders at the end. Note, during encoder resolving, types like `map`, `array` will be resolved to new expression(e.g. `MapObjects`, `CatalystToExternalMap`).
However, `ExpressionEncoder` can't be canonicalized. Thus, the canonicalized `ScalaUDF`s become different even if their original `ScalaUDF`s are the same. Finally, it fails the `checkValidAggregateExpression` when this `ScalaUDF` is used as a group expression.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users will not hit the exception after this fix.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#29106 from Ngone51/spark-32307.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Continuation of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28971 which lets streaming, catalyst and sql compile for 2.13. Same idea.
### Why are the changes needed?
Eventually, we need to support a Scala 2.13 build, perhaps in Spark 3.1.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests. (2.13 was not tested; this is about getting it to compile without breaking 2.12)
Closes#29078 from srowen/SPARK-29292.2.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is followup to #29061. See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29061#discussion_r453458611. Basically this moves If/CaseWhen/Coalesce case patterns after float/double case so we don't duplicate normalization on children for float/double If/CaseWhen/Coalesce.
### Why are the changes needed?
Simplify expression tree.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Modify unit tests.
Closes#29091 from viirya/SPARK-32258-followup.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes the empty child relations of a `Union`.
E.g. the query `SELECT c FROM t UNION ALL SELECT c FROM t WHERE false` has the following plan before this PR:
```
== Physical Plan ==
Union
:- *(1) Project [value#219 AS c#222]
: +- *(1) LocalTableScan [value#219]
+- LocalTableScan <empty>, [c#224]
```
and after this PR:
```
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [value#219 AS c#222]
+- *(1) LocalTableScan [value#219]
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To have a simpler plan.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new UTs.
Closes#29053 from peter-toth/SPARK-32241-remove-empty-children-of-union.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to let `NormalizeFloatingNumbers` rule directly normalizes on certain children expressions. It could simplify expression tree.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently NormalizeFloatingNumbers rule treats some expressions as black box but we can optimize it a bit by normalizing directly the inner children expressions.
Also see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28962#discussion_r448526240.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#29061 from viirya/SPARK-32258.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Rename documented argument `format` as `fmt`, to match the same argument name in several other SQL date/time functions, to wit, `date_format`, `date_trunc`, `trunc`, `to_date`, and `to_timestamp` all use `fmt`. Also `format_string` and `printf` use the same abbreviation in their argument `strfmt`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Consistency -- I was trying to scour the documentation for functions with arguments using Java string formatting, it would have been nice to rely on searching for `fmt` instead of my more manual approach.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
In the documentation only
### How was this patch tested?
No tests
Closes#29007 from MichaelChirico/sql-doc-format-fmt.
Authored-by: Michael Chirico <michael.chirico@grabtaxi.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use `ExpressionEncoder` for the return type of ScalaUDF to convert to the catalyst type, instead of using `CatalystTypeConverters`.
Note, this change only takes effect for typed Scala UDF since its the only case where we know the type tag of the raw type.
### Why are the changes needed?
Users now could register a UDF with `Instant`/`LocalDate` as return types even with `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled=false`. However, the UDF can not really be used.
For example, if we try:
```scala
scala> sql("set spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled=false")
scala> spark.udf.register("buildDate", udf{ d: String => java.time.LocalDate.parse(d) })
scala> Seq("2020-07-02").toDF("d").selectExpr("CAST(buildDate(d) AS STRING)").show
```
Then, we will hit the error:
```scala
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.time.LocalDate cannot be cast to java.sql.Date
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.CatalystTypeConverters$DateConverter$.toCatalystImpl(CatalystTypeConverters.scala:304)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.CatalystTypeConverters$CatalystTypeConverter.toCatalyst(CatalystTypeConverters.scala:107)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.CatalystTypeConverters$.$anonfun$createToCatalystConverter$2(CatalystTypeConverters.scala:425)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ScalaUDF.eval(ScalaUDF.scala:1169)
...
```
as it actually requires enabling `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled` when using the UDF. And I think this could make users get confused.
This happens because when registering the UDF, Spark actually uses `ExpressionEncoder` to ser/deser types. However, when using UDF, Spark uses `CatalystTypeConverters`, which is under control of `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled`, to ser/deser types. Therefore, Spark would fail to convert the Java8 date time types.
If we could also use `ExpressionEncoder` to ser/deser types for the return type, similar to what we do for the input parameter types, then, UDF could support Instant/LocalDate, event other combined complex types as well.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Before this PR, if users run the demo above, they would hit the error. After this PR, the demo will run successfully.
### How was this patch tested?
Updated 2 tests and added a new one for combined types of `Instant` and `LocalDate`.
Closes#28979 from Ngone51/udf-return-encoder.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Extract common code from the `FromUTCTimestamp` and `ToUTCTimestamp` expressions to new trait `UTCTimestamp`.
- Move `ToUTCTimestamp` closer to `FromUTCTimestamp`
### Why are the changes needed?
Code deduplication improves maintainability.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running date-time test suites such as `DateFunctionsSuite`
Closes#28998 from MaxGekk/dedup-from-to-utc-timestamp.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use `Utils.getSimpleName(function)` instead of `function.getClass.getSimpleName` to get the class name.
### Why are the changes needed?
For some functions(see the demo below), using `function.getClass.getSimpleName` can hit "Malformed class name" error.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. For the demo,
```scala
object MalformedClassObject extends Serializable {
class MalformedNonPrimitiveFunction extends (String => Int) with Serializable {
override def apply(v1: String): Int = v1.toInt / 0
}
}
OuterScopes.addOuterScope(MalformedClassObject)
val f = new MalformedClassObject.MalformedNonPrimitiveFunction()
Seq("20").toDF("col").select(udf(f).apply(Column("col"))).collect()
```
Before this PR, user can only see the error about "Malformed class name":
```scala
An exception or error caused a run to abort: Malformed class name
java.lang.InternalError: Malformed class name
at java.lang.Class.getSimpleName(Class.java:1330)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ScalaUDF.udfErrorMessage$lzycompute(ScalaUDF.scala:1157)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ScalaUDF.udfErrorMessage(ScalaUDF.scala:1155)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ScalaUDF.doGenCode(ScalaUDF.scala:1077)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression.$anonfun$genCode$3(Expression.scala:147)
at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:189)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression.genCode(Expression.scala:142)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Alias.genCode(namedExpressions.scala:160)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ProjectExec.$anonfun$doConsume$1(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:69)
...
```
After this PR, user can see the real root cause of the udf failure:
```scala
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Failed to execute user defined function(UDFSuite$MalformedClassObject$MalformedNonPrimitiveFunction: (string) => int)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:753)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$getByteArrayRdd$1(SparkPlan.scala:340)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$2(RDD.scala:898)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$2$adapted(RDD.scala:898)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:52)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:373)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:337)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:90)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:127)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.$anonfun$run$3(Executor.scala:464)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinally(Utils.scala:1377)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:467)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero
at org.apache.spark.sql.UDFSuite$MalformedClassObject$MalformedNonPrimitiveFunction.apply(UDFSuite.scala:677)
at org.apache.spark.sql.UDFSuite$MalformedClassObject$MalformedNonPrimitiveFunction.apply(UDFSuite.scala:676)
... 17 more
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test.
Closes#29050 from Ngone51/fix-malformed-udf.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves the test to make sure all the SQL keywords are documented correctly. It fixes several issues:
1. some keywords are not documented
2. some keywords are not ANSI SQL keywords but documented as reserved/non-reserved.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make sure the implementation matches the doc.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
new test
Closes#29055 from cloud-fan/keyword.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1.Add time field steps check for date start/end in Sequence at `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Sequence.TemporalSequenceImpl`
2.Add a UT：`SPARK-32133: Sequence step must be a day interval if start and end values are dates` at `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CollectionExpressionsSuite`
### Why are the changes needed?
**Sequence time field steps for date start/end looks strange in spark as follows:**
```
scala> sql("select explode(sequence(cast('2011-03-01' as date), cast('2011-03-02' as date), interval 1 hour))").head(3)
res0: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = _Array([2011-03-01], [2011-03-01], [2011-03-01])_ **<- strange result.**
scala> sql("select explode(sequence(cast('2011-03-01' as date), cast('2011-03-02' as date), interval 1 day))").head(3)
res1: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([2011-03-01], [2011-03-02])
```
**While this behavior in Prosto make sense：**
```
presto> select sequence(date('2011-03-01'),date('2011-03-02'),interval '1' hour);
Query 20200624_122744_00002_pehix failed: sequence step must be a day interval if start and end values are dates
presto> select sequence(date('2011-03-01'),date('2011-03-02'),interval '1' day);
_col0
[2011-03-01, 2011-03-02]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, after this patch, users will get informed `sequence step must be a day interval if start and end values are dates` when
use time field steps for date start/end in Sequence.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#28926 from TJX2014/master-SPARK-31982-sequence-cross-dst-follow-presto.
Authored-by: TJX2014 <xiaoxingstack@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this PR, I suppose we support 'f'-suffixed float literal, e.g. `select 1.1f`
### Why are the changes needed?
a very common feature across platforms, checked with pg, presto, hive, MySQL...
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
yes,
`select 1.1f` results float value 1.1 instead of throwing AnlaysisExceptiion`Can't extract value from 1: need struct type but got int;`
### How was this patch tested?
add unit tests
Closes#29022 from yaooqinn/SPARK-32207.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to partially reverts the simple string in `NullType` at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28833: `NullType.simpleString` back from `unknown` to `null`.
### Why are the changes needed?
- Technically speaking, it's orthogonal with the issue itself, SPARK-20680.
- It needs some more discussion, see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28833#issuecomment-655277714
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
It reverts back the user-facing changes at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28833.
The simple string of `NullType` is back to `null`.
### How was this patch tested?
I just logically reverted. Jenkins should test it out.
Closes#29041 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-20680.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Introduce a new SQL config `spark.sql.optimizer.ignoreHints`. When this is set to true
application of hints are disabled. This is similar to Oracle's OPTIMIZER_IGNORE_HINTS.
This can be helpful to study the impact of performance difference when hints are applied vs when they are not.
### Why are the changes needed?
Can be helpful to study the impact of performance difference when hints are applied vs when they are not.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New tests added in ResolveHintsSuite.
Closes#28683 from dilipbiswal/disable_hint.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dkbiswal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Context: The fix for SPARK-27296 introduced by #25024 allows `Aggregator` objects to appear in queries. This works fine for aggregators with atomic input types, e.g. `Aggregator[Double, _, _]`.
However it can cause a null pointer exception if the input type is `Array[_]`. This was historically considered an ignorable case for serialization of `UnresolvedMapObjects`, but the new ScalaAggregator class causes these expressions to be serialized over to executors because the resolve-and-bind is being deferred.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A new rule `ResolveEncodersInScalaAgg` that performs the resolution of the expressions contained in the encoders so that properly resolved expressions are serialized over to executors.
### Why are the changes needed?
Applying an aggregator of the form `Aggregator[Array[_], _, _]` using `functions.udaf()` currently causes a null pointer error in Catalyst.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
A unit test has been added that does aggregation with array types for input, buffer, and output. I have done additional testing with my own custom aggregators in the spark REPL.
Closes#28983 from erikerlandson/fix-spark-32159.
Authored-by: Erik Erlandson <eerlands@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27627 to fix the remaining issues. There are 2 issues fixed in this PR:
1. `UnsafeRow.setDecimal` can set an overflowed decimal and causes an error when reading it. The expected behavior is to return null.
2. The update/merge expression for decimal type in `Sum` is wrong. We shouldn't turn the `sum` value back to 0 after it becomes null due to overflow. This issue was hidden because:
2.1 for hash aggregate, the buffer is unsafe row. Due to the first bug, we fail when overflow happens, so there is no chance to mistakenly turn null back to 0.
2.2 for sort-based aggregate, the buffer is generic row. The decimal can overflow (the Decimal class has unlimited precision) and we don't have the null problem.
If we only fix the first bug, then the second bug is exposed and test fails. If we only fix the second bug, there is no way to test it. This PR fixes these 2 bugs together.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix issues during decimal sum when overflow happens
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Now decimal sum can return null correctly for overflow under non-ansi mode.
### How was this patch tested?
new test and updated test
Closes#29026 from cloud-fan/decimal.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When converting an `INSERT OVERWRITE` query to a v2 overwrite plan, Spark attempts to detect when a dynamic overwrite and a static overwrite will produce the same result so it can use the static overwrite. Spark incorrectly detects when dynamic and static overwrites are equivalent when there are hidden partitions, such as `days(ts)`.
This updates the analyzer rule `ResolveInsertInto` to always use a dynamic overwrite when the mode is dynamic, and static when the mode is static. This avoids the problem by not trying to determine whether the two plans are equivalent and always using the one that corresponds to the partition overwrite mode.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a correctness bug. If a table has hidden partitions, all of the values for those partitions are dropped instead of dynamically overwriting changed partitions.
This only affects SQL commands (not `DataFrameWriter`) writing to tables that have hidden partitions. It is also only a problem when the partition overwrite mode is dynamic.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it fixes the correctness bug detailed above.
### How was this patch tested?
* This updates the in-memory table to support a hidden partition transform, `days`, and adds a test case to `DataSourceV2SQLSuite` in which the table uses this hidden partition function. This test fails without the fix to `ResolveInsertInto`.
* This updates the test case `InsertInto: overwrite - multiple static partitions - dynamic mode` in `InsertIntoTests`. The result of the SQL command is unchanged, but the SQL command will now use a dynamic overwrite so the test now uses `dynamicOverwriteTest`.
Closes#28993 from rdblue/fix-insert-overwrite-v2-conversion.
Authored-by: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify the comment of `SqlBase.g4`.
### Why are the changes needed?
`docs/sql-keywords.md` has already moved to `docs/sql-ref-ansi-compliance.md#sql-keywords`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
No need.
Closes#29033 from ulysses-you/SPARK-30703-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is the new PR which to address the close one #17953
1. support "void" primitive data type in the `AstBuilder`, point it to `NullType`
2. forbid creating tables with VOID/NULL column type
### Why are the changes needed?
1. Spark is incompatible with hive void type. When Hive table schema contains void type, DESC table will throw an exception in Spark.
>hive> create table bad as select 1 x, null z from dual;
>hive> describe bad;
OK
x int
z void
In Spark2.0.x, the behaviour to read this view is normal:
>spark-sql> describe bad;
x int NULL
z void NULL
Time taken: 4.431 seconds, Fetched 2 row(s)
But in lastest Spark version, it failed with SparkException: Cannot recognize hive type string: void
>spark-sql> describe bad;
17/05/09 03:12:08 ERROR thriftserver.SparkSQLDriver: Failed in [describe bad]
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Cannot recognize hive type string: void
Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
DataType void() is not supported.(line 1, pos 0)
== SQL ==
void
^^^
... 61 more
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Cannot recognize hive type string: void
2. Hive CTAS statements throws error when select clause has NULL/VOID type column since HIVE-11217
In Spark, creating table with a VOID/NULL column should throw readable exception message, include
- create data source table (using parquet, json, ...)
- create hive table (with or without stored as)
- CTAS
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Add unit tests
Closes#28833 from LantaoJin/SPARK-20680_COPY.
Authored-by: LantaoJin <jinlantao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Set the SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.allowCastNumericToTimestamp` to `true` by default
2. Remove explicit sets of `spark.sql.legacy.allowCastNumericToTimestamp` to `true` in the cast suites.
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid breaking changes in minor versions (in the upcoming Spark 3.1.0) according to the the semantic versioning guidelines (https://spark.apache.org/versioning-policy.html)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
By `CastSuite`.
Closes#29012 from MaxGekk/allow-cast-numeric-to-timestamp.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to deal with cosmetic variations when processing nested column extractors in `NestedColumnAliasing`. Currently if cosmetic variations are in the nested column extractors, the query is not optimized.
### Why are the changes needed?
If the expressions extracting nested fields have cosmetic variations like qualifier difference, currently nested column pruning cannot work well.
For example, two attributes which are semantically the same, are referred in a query, but the nested column extractors of them are treated differently when we deal with nested column pruning.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, fixing a bug in nested column pruning.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#28988 from viirya/SPARK-32163.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added a new `withField` method to the `Column` class. This method should allow users to add or replace a `StructField` in a `StructType` column (with very similar semantics to the `withColumn` method on `Dataset`).
### Why are the changes needed?
Often Spark users have to work with deeply nested data e.g. to fix a data quality issue with an existing `StructField`. To do this with the existing Spark APIs, users have to rebuild the entire struct column.
For example, let's say you have the following deeply nested data structure which has a data quality issue (`5` is missing):
```
import org.apache.spark.sql._
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
val data = spark.createDataFrame(sc.parallelize(
Seq(Row(Row(Row(1, 2, 3), Row(Row(4, null, 6), Row(7, 8, 9), Row(10, 11, 12)), Row(13, 14, 15))))),
StructType(Seq(
StructField("a", StructType(Seq(
StructField("a", StructType(Seq(
StructField("a", IntegerType),
StructField("b", IntegerType),
StructField("c", IntegerType)))),
StructField("b", StructType(Seq(
StructField("a", StructType(Seq(
StructField("a", IntegerType),
StructField("b", IntegerType),
StructField("c", IntegerType)))),
StructField("b", StructType(Seq(
StructField("a", IntegerType),
StructField("b", IntegerType),
StructField("c", IntegerType)))),
StructField("c", StructType(Seq(
StructField("a", IntegerType),
StructField("b", IntegerType),
StructField("c", IntegerType))))
))),
StructField("c", StructType(Seq(
StructField("a", IntegerType),
StructField("b", IntegerType),
StructField("c", IntegerType))))
)))))).cache
data.show(false)
+---------------------------------+
|a |
+---------------------------------+
|[[1, 2, 3], [[4,, 6], [7, 8, 9]]]|
+---------------------------------+
```
Currently, to replace the missing value users would have to do something like this:
```
val result = data.withColumn("a",
struct(
$"a.a",
struct(
struct(
$"a.b.a.a",
lit(5).as("b"),
$"a.b.a.c"
).as("a"),
$"a.b.b",
$"a.b.c"
).as("b"),
$"a.c"
))
result.show(false)
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|a |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|[[1, 2, 3], [[4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9], [10, 11, 12]], [13, 14, 15]]|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
```
As you can see above, with the existing methods users must call the `struct` function and list all fields, including fields they don't want to change. This is not ideal as:
>this leads to complex, fragile code that cannot survive schema evolution.
[SPARK-16483](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16483)
In contrast, with the method added in this PR, a user could simply do something like this:
```
val result = data.withColumn("a", 'a.withField("b.a.b", lit(5)))
result.show(false)
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|a |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|[[1, 2, 3], [[4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9], [10, 11, 12]], [13, 14, 15]]|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
```
This is the first of maybe a few methods that could be added to the `Column` class to make it easier to manipulate nested data. Other methods under discussion in [SPARK-22231](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22231) include `drop` and `renameField`. However, these should be added in a separate PR.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New unit tests were added. Jenkins must pass them.
### Related JIRAs:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22231
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16483Closes#27066 from fqaiser94/SPARK-22231-withField.
Lead-authored-by: fqaiser94@gmail.com <fqaiser94@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: fqaiser94 <fqaiser94@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace the combination of expressions `SecondsToTimestamp` and `UnixTimestamp` by `GetTimestamp` in `ParseToDate`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Eliminate unnecessary parsing overhead in: **string -> timestamp -> long (seconds) -> timestamp -> date**. After the changes, the chain will be: **string -> timestamp -> date**.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites such as `DateFunctionsSuite`.
Closes#28999 from MaxGekk/ParseToDate-parse-timestamp.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add WindowFunction check at `CheckAnalysis`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Provide friendly error msg.
**BEFORE**
```scala
scala> sql("select rank() from values(1)").show
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot generate code for expression: rank()
```
**AFTER**
```scala
scala> sql("select rank() from values(1)").show
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Window function rank() requires an OVER clause.;;
Project [rank() AS RANK()#3]
+- LocalRelation [col1#2]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, user wiill be given a better error msg.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the newly added UT.
Closes#28808 from ulysses-you/SPARK-31975.
Authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix nullability of `GetArrayStructFields`. It should consider both the original array's `containsNull` and the inner field's nullability.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix a correctness issue.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. See the added test.
### How was this patch tested?
a new UT and end-to-end test
Closes#28992 from cloud-fan/bug.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Check the namespace existence while calling "use namespace", and throw NoSuchNamespaceException if namespace not exists.
### Why are the changes needed?
Users need to know that the namespace does not exist when they try to set a wrong namespace.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Run all suites and add a test for this
Closes#27900 from stczwd/SPARK-31100.
Authored-by: stczwd <qcsd2011@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes wrong groupBy result if the grouping key is a null-value struct.
### Why are the changes needed?
`NormalizeFloatingNumbers` reconstructs a struct if input expression is StructType. If the input struct is null, it will reconstruct a struct with null-value fields, instead of null.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, fixing incorrect groupBy result.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#28962 from viirya/SPARK-32136.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As the followup of #28900, this patch extends coalescing partitions to repartitioning using hints and SQL syntax without specifying number of partitions, when AQE is enabled.
### Why are the changes needed?
When repartitionning using hints and SQL syntax, we should follow the shuffling behavior of repartition by expression/range to coalesce partitions when AQE is enabled.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After this change, if users don't specify the number of partitions when repartitioning using `REPARTITION`/`REPARTITION_BY_RANGE` hint or `DISTRIBUTE BY`/`CLUSTER BY`, AQE will coalesce partitions.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#28952 from viirya/SPARK-32056-sql.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set the JSON option `inferTimestamp` to `false` if an user don't pass it as datasource option.
### Why are the changes needed?
To prevent perf regression while inferring schemas from JSON with potential timestamps fields.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
- Modified existing tests in `JsonSuite` and `JsonInferSchemaSuite`.
- Regenerated results of `JsonBenchmark` in the environment:
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) |
| Java | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_252 and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.7+10 |
Closes#28966 from MaxGekk/json-inferTimestamps-disable-by-default.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28534 , to make `TIMESTAMP_SECONDS` function support fractional input as well.
### Why are the changes needed?
Previously the cast function can cast fractional values to timestamp. Now we suggest users to ues these new functions, and we need to cover all the cast use cases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now `TIMESTAMP_SECONDS` function accepts fractional input.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#28956 from cloud-fan/follow.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark can't push down scan predicate condition of **Or**:
Such as if I have a table `default.test`, it's partition col is `dt`,
If we use query :
```
select * from default.test
where dt=20190625 or (dt = 20190626 and id in (1,2,3) )
```
In this case, Spark will resolve **Or** condition as one expression, and since this expr has reference of "id", then it can't been push down.
Base on pr https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733, In my PR , for SQL like
`select * from default.test`
`where dt = 20190626 or (dt = 20190627 and xxx="a") `
For this condition `dt = 20190626 or (dt = 20190627 and xxx="a" )`, it will been converted to CNF
```
(dt = 20190626 or dt = 20190627) and (dt = 20190626 or xxx = "a" )
```
then condition `dt = 20190626 or dt = 20190627` will be push down when partition pruning
### Why are the changes needed?
Optimize partition pruning
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT
Closes#28805 from AngersZhuuuu/cnf-for-partition-pruning.
Lead-authored-by: angerszhu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: AngersZhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update documentation to reflect changes in faf220aad9
I've changed the documentation to reflect updated statistics may be used to improve query plan.
### Why are the changes needed?
I believe the documentation is stale and misleading.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, this is a javadoc documentation fix.
### How was this patch tested?
Doc fix.
Closes#28925 from emkornfield/spark-32095.
Authored-by: Micah Kornfield <micahk@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix error exception messages during exceptions on Union and set operations
### Why are the changes needed?
Union and set operations can only be performed on tables with the compatible column types,while when we have more than two column, the exception messages will have wrong column index.
Steps to reproduce:
```
drop table if exists test1;
drop table if exists test2;
drop table if exists test3;
create table if not exists test1(id int, age int, name timestamp);
create table if not exists test2(id int, age timestamp, name timestamp);
create table if not exists test3(id int, age int, name int);
insert into test1 select 1,2,'2020-01-01 01:01:01';
insert into test2 select 1,'2020-01-01 01:01:01','2020-01-01 01:01:01';
insert into test3 select 1,3,4;
```
Query1:
```sql
select * from test1 except select * from test2;
```
Result1:
```
Error: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Except can only be performed on tables with the compatible column types. timestamp <> int at the second column of the second table;; 'Except false :- Project [id#620, age#621, name#622] : +- SubqueryAlias `default`.`test1` : +- HiveTableRelation `default`.`test1`, org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.lazy.LazySimpleSerDe, [id#620, age#621, name#622] +- Project [id#623, age#624, name#625] +- SubqueryAlias `default`.`test2` +- HiveTableRelation `default`.`test2`, org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.lazy.LazySimpleSerDe, [id#623, age#624, name#625] (state=,code=0)
```
Query2:
```sql
select * from test1 except select * from test3;
```
Result2:
```
Error: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Except can only be performed on tables with the compatible column types
int <> timestamp at the 2th column of the second table;
```
the above query1 has the right exception message
the above query2 have the wrong errors information, it may need to change to the following
```
Error: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Except can only be performed on tables with the compatible column types.
int <> timestamp at the third column of the second table
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
unit test
Closes#28951 from GuoPhilipse/32131-correct-error-messages.
Lead-authored-by: GuoPhilipse <46367746+GuoPhilipse@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: GuoPhilipse <guofei_ok@126.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
