## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As reported in the Jira, there are some weird issues with exploding Python UDFs in SparkSQL.
The following test code can reproduce it. Notice: the following test code is reported to return wrong results in the Jira. However, as I tested on master branch, it causes exception and so can't return any result.
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import *
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>>
>>> df = spark.range(10)
>>>
>>> def return_range(value):
... return [(i, str(i)) for i in range(value - 1, value + 1)]
...
>>> range_udf = udf(return_range, ArrayType(StructType([StructField("integer_val", IntegerType()),
... StructField("string_val", StringType())])))
>>>
>>> df.select("id", explode(range_udf(df.id))).show()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/spark/python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 318, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20))
File "/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.4-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1133, in __call__
File "/spark/python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 63, in deco
return f(*a, **kw)
File "/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.4-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 319, in get_return_value py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o126.showString.: java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed
at scala.Predef$.assert(Predef.scala:156)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.CodegenSupport$class.consume(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.GenerateExec.consume(GenerateExec.scala:57)
The cause of this issue is, in `ExtractPythonUDFs` we insert `BatchEvalPythonExec` to run PythonUDFs in batch. `BatchEvalPythonExec` will add extra outputs (e.g., `pythonUDF0`) to original plan. In above case, the original `Range` only has one output `id`. After `ExtractPythonUDFs`, the added `BatchEvalPythonExec` has two outputs `id` and `pythonUDF0`.
Because the output of `GenerateExec` is given after analysis phase, in above case, it is the combination of `id`, i.e., the output of `Range`, and `col`. But in planning phase, we change `GenerateExec`'s child plan to `BatchEvalPythonExec` with additional output attributes.
It will cause no problem in non wholestage codegen. Because when evaluating the additional attributes are projected out the final output of `GenerateExec`.
However, as `GenerateExec` now supports wholestage codegen, the framework will input all the outputs of the child plan to `GenerateExec`. Then when consuming `GenerateExec`'s output data (i.e., calling `consume`), the number of output attributes is different to the output variables in wholestage codegen.
To solve this issue, this patch only gives the generator's output to `GenerateExec` after analysis phase. `GenerateExec`'s output is the combination of its child plan's output and the generator's output. So when we change `GenerateExec`'s child, its output is still correct.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#16120 from viirya/fix-py-udf-with-generator.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQuery.explain and exception to Python.
- Fix StreamingQueryException to not expose `OffsetSeq`.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16125 from zsxwing/py-streaming-explain.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Makes `Window.unboundedPreceding` and `Window.unboundedFollowing` backward compatible.
## How was this patch tested?
Pyspark SQL unittests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16123 from zero323/SPARK-17845-follow-up.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In`JavaWrapper `'s destructor make Java Gateway dereference object in destructor, using `SparkContext._active_spark_context._gateway.detach`
Fixing the copying parameter bug, by moving the `copy` method from `JavaModel` to `JavaParams`
## How was this patch tested?
```scala
import random, string
from pyspark.ml.feature import StringIndexer
l = [(''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_uppercase) for _ in range(10)), ) for _ in range(int(7e5))] # 700000 random strings of 10 characters
df = spark.createDataFrame(l, ['string'])
for i in range(50):
indexer = StringIndexer(inputCol='string', outputCol='index')
indexer.fit(df)
```
* Before: would keep StringIndexer strong reference, causing GC issues and is halted midway
After: garbage collection works as the object is dereferenced, and computation completes
* Mem footprint tested using profiler
* Added a parameter copy related test which was failing before.
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Author: jkbradley <joseph.kurata.bradley@gmail.com>
Closes#15843 from techaddict/SPARK-18274.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
added the new handleInvalid param for these transformers to Python to maintain API parity.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
testing is done with new doctests
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Closes#15817 from techaddict/SPARK-18366.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQueryStatus.json
- Make it not case class (to avoid unnecessarily exposing implicit object StreamingQueryStatus, consistent with StreamingQueryProgress)
- Add StreamingQuery.status to Python
- Fix post-termination status
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#16075 from tdas/SPARK-18516-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add python api for KMeansSummary
## How was this patch tested?
unit test added
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#13557 from zjffdu/SPARK-15819.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
make a pass through the items marked as Experimental or DeveloperApi and see if any are stable enough to be unmarked. Also check for items marked final or sealed to see if they are stable enough to be opened up as APIs.
Some discussions in the jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18319
## How was this patch tested?
existing ut
Author: Yuhao <yuhao.yang@intel.com>
Author: Yuhao Yang <hhbyyh@gmail.com>
Closes#15972 from hhbyyh/experimental21.
This PR separates the status of a `StreamingQuery` into two separate APIs:
- `status` - describes the status of a `StreamingQuery` at this moment, including what phase of processing is currently happening and if data is available.
- `recentProgress` - an array of statistics about the most recent microbatches that have executed.
A recent progress contains the following information:
```
{
"id" : "2be8670a-fce1-4859-a530-748f29553bb6",
"name" : "query-29",
"timestamp" : 1479705392724,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303,
"durationMs" : {
"triggerExecution" : 276,
"queryPlanning" : 3,
"getBatch" : 5,
"getOffset" : 3,
"addBatch" : 234,
"walCommit" : 30
},
"currentWatermark" : 0,
"stateOperators" : [ ],
"sources" : [ {
"description" : "KafkaSource[Subscribe[topic-14]]",
"startOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 0,
"4" : 1,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 0
}
},
"endOffset" : {
"topic-14" : {
"2" : 1,
"4" : 2,
"1" : 0,
"3" : 0,
"0" : 1
}
},
"numRecords" : 3,
"inputRowsPerSecond" : 230.76923076923077,
"processedRowsPerSecond" : 10.869565217391303
} ]
}
```
Additionally, in order to make it possible to correlate progress updates across restarts, we change the `id` field from an integer that is unique with in the JVM to a `UUID` that is globally unique.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#15954 from marmbrus/queryProgress.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes SparkContext broken state in which it may fall if spark driver get crashed or killed by OOM.
## How was this patch tested?
1. Start SparkContext;
2. Find Spark driver process and `kill -9` it;
3. Call `sc.stop()`;
4. Create new SparkContext after that;
Without this patch you will crash on step 3 and won't be able to do step 4 without manual reset private attibutes or IPython notebook / shell restart.
Author: Alexander Shorin <kxepal@apache.org>
Closes#15961 from kxepal/18523-make-spark-context-stop-more-reliable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove deprecated methods for ML.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15913 from yanboliang/spark-18481.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds two of the newly added methods of `Dataset`s to Python:
`withWatermark` and `checkpoint`
## How was this patch tested?
Doc tests
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#15921 from brkyvz/py-watermark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expose RDD's localCheckpoint() and associated functions in PySpark.
## How was this patch tested?
I added a UnitTest in python/pyspark/tests.py which passes.
I certify that this is my original work, and I license it to the project under the project's open source license.
Gabriel HUANG
Developer at Cardabel (http://cardabel.com/)
Author: Gabriel Huang <gabi.xiaohuang@gmail.com>
Closes#15811 from gabrielhuang/pyspark-localcheckpoint.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add model summary APIs for `GaussianMixtureModel` and `BisectingKMeansModel` in pyspark.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Author: sethah <seth.hendrickson16@gmail.com>
Closes#15777 from sethah/pyspark_cluster_summaries.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I found the documentation for the sample method to be confusing, this adds more clarification across all languages.
- [x] Scala
- [x] Python
- [x] R
- [x] RDD Scala
- [ ] RDD Python with SEED
- [X] RDD Java
- [x] RDD Java with SEED
- [x] RDD Python
## How was this patch tested?
NA
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: anabranch <wac.chambers@gmail.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <bill@databricks.com>
Closes#15815 from anabranch/SPARK-18365.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to provide a pip installable PySpark package. This does a bunch of work to copy the jars over and package them with the Python code (to prevent challenges from trying to use different versions of the Python code with different versions of the JAR). It does not currently publish to PyPI but that is the natural follow up (SPARK-18129).
Done:
- pip installable on conda [manual tested]
- setup.py installed on a non-pip managed system (RHEL) with YARN [manual tested]
- Automated testing of this (virtualenv)
- packaging and signing with release-build*
Possible follow up work:
- release-build update to publish to PyPI (SPARK-18128)
- figure out who owns the pyspark package name on prod PyPI (is it someone with in the project or should we ask PyPI or should we choose a different name to publish with like ApachePySpark?)
- Windows support and or testing ( SPARK-18136 )
- investigate details of wheel caching and see if we can avoid cleaning the wheel cache during our test
- consider how we want to number our dev/snapshot versions
Explicitly out of scope:
- Using pip installed PySpark to start a standalone cluster
- Using pip installed PySpark for non-Python Spark programs
*I've done some work to test release-build locally but as a non-committer I've just done local testing.
## How was this patch tested?
Automated testing with virtualenv, manual testing with conda, a system wide install, and YARN integration.
release-build changes tested locally as a non-committer (no testing of upload artifacts to Apache staging websites)
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Author: Juliet Hougland <juliet@cloudera.com>
Author: Juliet Hougland <not@myemail.com>
Closes#15659 from holdenk/SPARK-1267-pip-install-pyspark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-18459: triggerId seems like a number that should be increasing with each trigger, whether or not there is data in it. However, actually, triggerId increases only where there is a batch of data in a trigger. So its better to rename it to batchId.
SPARK-18460: triggerDetails was missing from json representation. Fixed it.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated existing unit tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#15895 from tdas/SPARK-18459.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the error message is correct but doesn't provide additional hint to new users. It would be better to hint related configuration to users in the message.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A because it only changes error message.
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#15822 from viirya/minor-pyspark-worker-errmsg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we use java serialization for the WAL that stores the offsets contained in each batch. This has two main issues:
It can break across spark releases (though this is not the only thing preventing us from upgrading a running query)
It is unnecessarily opaque to the user.
I'd propose we require offsets to provide a user readable serialization and use that instead. JSON is probably a good option.
## How was this patch tested?
Tests were added for KafkaSourceOffset in [KafkaSourceOffsetSuite](external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceOffsetSuite.scala) and for LongOffset in [OffsetSuite](sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/OffsetSuite.scala)
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
zsxwing marmbrus
Author: Tyson Condie <tcondie@gmail.com>
Author: Tyson Condie <tcondie@clash.local>
Closes#15626 from tcondie/spark-8360.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Gradient Boosted Tree in R.
With a few minor improvements to RandomForest in R.
Since this is relatively isolated I'd like to target this for branch-2.1
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests, unit tests
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15746 from felixcheung/rgbt.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
minor doc update that should go to master & branch-2.1
## How was this patch tested?
manual
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15747 from felixcheung/pySPARK-14393.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Document that Java 7, Python 2.6, Scala 2.10, Hadoop < 2.6 are deprecated in Spark 2.1.0. This does not actually implement any of the change in SPARK-18138, just peppers the documentation with notices about it.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc build
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#15733 from srowen/SPARK-18138.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add missing 'subsamplingRate' of pyspark GBTClassifier
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#15692 from zhengruifeng/gbt_subsamplingRate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Renamed kbest to numTopFeatures
- Renamed alpha to fpr
- Added missing Since annotations
- Doc cleanups
## How was this patch tested?
Added new standardized unit tests for spark.ml.
Improved existing unit test coverage a bit.
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#15647 from jkbradley/chisqselector-follow-ups.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add `to_json` function in contrast with `from_json` in Scala, Java and Python.
It'd be useful if we can convert a same column from/to json. Also, some datasources do not support nested types. If we are forced to save a dataframe into those data sources, we might be able to work around by this function.
The usage is as below:
``` scala
val df = Seq(Tuple1(Tuple1(1))).toDF("a")
df.select(to_json($"a").as("json")).show()
```
``` bash
+--------+
| json|
+--------+
|{"_1":1}|
+--------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonExpressionsSuite`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#15354 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-17764.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add subsmaplingRate to randomForestClassifier
Add varianceCol to randomForestRegressor
In Python
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15638 from felixcheung/pyrandomforest.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is an enhancement of PR with commit ID:57dc326bd00cf0a49da971e9c573c48ae28acaa2.
NaN is a special type of value which is commonly seen as invalid. But We find that there are certain cases where NaN are also valuable, thus need special handling. We provided user when dealing NaN values with 3 options, to either reserve an extra bucket for NaN values, or remove the NaN values, or report an error, by setting handleNaN "keep", "skip", or "error"(default) respectively.
'''Before:
val bucketizer: Bucketizer = new Bucketizer()
.setInputCol("feature")
.setOutputCol("result")
.setSplits(splits)
'''After:
val bucketizer: Bucketizer = new Bucketizer()
.setInputCol("feature")
.setOutputCol("result")
.setSplits(splits)
.setHandleNaN("keep")
## How was this patch tested?
Tests added in QuantileDiscretizerSuite, BucketizerSuite and DataFrameStatSuite
Signed-off-by: VinceShieh <vincent.xieintel.com>
Author: VinceShieh <vincent.xie@intel.com>
Author: Vincent Xie <vincent.xie@intel.com>
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#15428 from VinceShieh/spark-17219_followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
API and programming guide doc changes for Scala, Python and R.
## How was this patch tested?
manual test
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#15629 from felixcheung/jsondoc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
StreamingQueryStatus exposed through StreamingQueryListener often needs to be recorded (similar to SparkListener events). This PR adds `.json` and `.prettyJson` to `StreamingQueryStatus`, `SourceStatus` and `SinkStatus`.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#15476 from tdas/SPARK-17926.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1) Upgrade the Py4J version on the Java side
2) Update the py4j src zip file we bundle with Spark
## How was this patch tested?
Existing doctests & unit tests pass
Author: Jagadeesan <as2@us.ibm.com>
Closes#15514 from jagadeesanas2/SPARK-17960.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change is a followup for #15389 which calls `_to_java_object_rdd()` to solve this issue. Due to the concern of the possible expensive cost of the call, we can choose to decrease the batch size to solve this issue too.
Simple benchmark:
import time
num_partitions = 20000
a = sc.parallelize(range(int(1e6)), 2)
start = time.time()
l = a.repartition(num_partitions).glom().map(len).collect()
end = time.time()
print(end - start)
Before: 419.447577953
_to_java_object_rdd(): 421.916361094
decreasing the batch size: 423.712255955
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#15445 from viirya/repartition-batch-size.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a crossJoin function to the DataFrame API similar to that in Scala. Joins with no condition (cartesian products) must be specified with the crossJoin API
## How was this patch tested?
Added python tests to ensure that an AnalysisException if a cartesian product is specified without crossJoin(), and that cartesian products can execute if specified via crossJoin()
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark before opening a pull request.
Author: Srinath Shankar <srinath@databricks.com>
Closes#15493 from srinathshankar/crosspython.
Currently pyspark can only call the builtin java UDF, but can not call custom java UDF. It would be better to allow that. 2 benefits:
* Leverage the power of rich third party java library
* Improve the performance. Because if we use python UDF, python daemons will be started on worker which will affect the performance.
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#9766 from zjffdu/SPARK-11775.
[SPARK-11905](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11905) added support for `persist`/`cache` for `Dataset`. However, there is no user-facing API to check if a `Dataset` is cached and if so what the storage level is. This PR adds `getStorageLevel` to `Dataset`, analogous to `RDD.getStorageLevel`.
Updated `DatasetCacheSuite`.
Author: Nick Pentreath <nickp@za.ibm.com>
Closes#13780 from MLnick/ds-storagelevel.
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For feature selection method ChiSquareSelector, it is based on the ChiSquareTestResult.statistic (ChiSqure value) to select the features. It select the features with the largest ChiSqure value. But the Degree of Freedom (df) of ChiSqure value is different in Statistics.chiSqTest(RDD), and for different df, you cannot base on ChiSqure value to select features.
So we change statistic to pValue for SelectKBest and SelectPercentile
## How was this patch tested?
change existing test
Author: Peng <peng.meng@intel.com>
Closes#15444 from mpjlu/chisqure-bug.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since ```ml.evaluation``` has supported save/load at Scala side, supporting it at Python side is very straightforward and easy.
## How was this patch tested?
Add python doctest.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#13194 from yanboliang/spark-15402.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow-up work of #13675, add Python API for ```RFormula forceIndexLabel```.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#15430 from yanboliang/spark-15957-python.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Metrics are needed for monitoring structured streaming apps. Here is the design doc for implementing the necessary metrics.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NIdcGuR1B3WIe8t7VxLrt58TJB4DtipWEbj5I_mzJys/edit?usp=sharing
Specifically, this PR adds the following public APIs changes.
### New APIs
- `StreamingQuery.status` returns a `StreamingQueryStatus` object (renamed from `StreamingQueryInfo`, see later)
- `StreamingQueryStatus` has the following important fields
- inputRate - Current rate (rows/sec) at which data is being generated by all the sources
- processingRate - Current rate (rows/sec) at which the query is processing data from
all the sources
- ~~outputRate~~ - *Does not work with wholestage codegen*
- latency - Current average latency between the data being available in source and the sink writing the corresponding output
- sourceStatuses: Array[SourceStatus] - Current statuses of the sources
- sinkStatus: SinkStatus - Current status of the sink
- triggerStatus - Low-level detailed status of the last completed/currently active trigger
- latencies - getOffset, getBatch, full trigger, wal writes
- timestamps - trigger start, finish, after getOffset, after getBatch
- numRows - input, output, state total/updated rows for aggregations
- `SourceStatus` has the following important fields
- inputRate - Current rate (rows/sec) at which data is being generated by the source
- processingRate - Current rate (rows/sec) at which the query is processing data from the source
- triggerStatus - Low-level detailed status of the last completed/currently active trigger
- Python API for `StreamingQuery.status()`
### Breaking changes to existing APIs
**Existing direct public facing APIs**
- Deprecated direct public-facing APIs `StreamingQuery.sourceStatuses` and `StreamingQuery.sinkStatus` in favour of `StreamingQuery.status.sourceStatuses/sinkStatus`.
- Branch 2.0 should have it deprecated, master should have it removed.
**Existing advanced listener APIs**
- `StreamingQueryInfo` renamed to `StreamingQueryStatus` for consistency with `SourceStatus`, `SinkStatus`
- Earlier StreamingQueryInfo was used only in the advanced listener API, but now it is used in direct public-facing API (StreamingQuery.status)
- Field `queryInfo` in listener events `QueryStarted`, `QueryProgress`, `QueryTerminated` changed have name `queryStatus` and return type `StreamingQueryStatus`.
- Field `offsetDesc` in `SourceStatus` was Option[String], converted it to `String`.
- For `SourceStatus` and `SinkStatus` made constructor private instead of private[sql] to make them more java-safe. Instead added `private[sql] object SourceStatus/SinkStatus.apply()` which are harder to accidentally use in Java.
## How was this patch tested?
Old and new unit tests.
- Rate calculation and other internal logic of StreamMetrics tested by StreamMetricsSuite.
- New info in statuses returned through StreamingQueryListener is tested in StreamingQueryListenerSuite.
- New and old info returned through StreamingQuery.status is tested in StreamingQuerySuite.
- Source-specific tests for making sure input rows are counted are is source-specific test suites.
- Additional tests to test minor additions in LocalTableScanExec, StateStore, etc.
Metrics also manually tested using Ganglia sink
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#15307 from tdas/SPARK-17731.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
update python api for NaiveBayes: add weight col parameter.
## How was this patch tested?
doctests added.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#15406 from WeichenXu123/nb_python_update.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves the window function frame boundary API to make it more obvious to read and to use. The two high level changes are:
1. Create Window.currentRow, Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.unboundedFollowing to indicate the special values in frame boundaries. These methods map to the special integral values so we are not breaking backward compatibility here. This change makes the frame boundaries more self-evident (instead of Long.MinValue, it becomes Window.unboundedPreceding).
2. In Python, for any value less than or equal to JVM's Long.MinValue, treat it as Window.unboundedPreceding. For any value larger than or equal to JVM's Long.MaxValue, treat it as Window.unboundedFollowing. Before this change, if the user specifies any value that is less than Long.MinValue but not -sys.maxsize (e.g. -sys.maxsize + 1), the number we pass over to the JVM would overflow, resulting in a frame that does not make sense.
Code example required to specify a frame before this patch:
```
Window.rowsBetween(-Long.MinValue, 0)
```
While the above code should still work, the new way is more obvious to read:
```
Window.rowsBetween(Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.currentRow)
```
## How was this patch tested?
- Updated DataFrameWindowSuite (for Scala/Java)
- Updated test_window_functions_cumulative_sum (for Python)
- Renamed DataFrameWindowSuite DataFrameWindowFunctionsSuite to better reflect its purpose
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#15438 from rxin/SPARK-17845.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PySpark, the invalid join type will not throw error for the following join:
```df1.join(df2, how='not-a-valid-join-type')```
The signature of the join is:
```def join(self, other, on=None, how=None):```
The existing code completely ignores the `how` parameter when `on` is `None`. This patch will process the arguments passed to join and pass in to JVM Spark SQL Analyzer, which will validate the join type passed.
## How was this patch tested?
Used manual and existing test suites.
Author: Bijay Pathak <bkpathak@mtu.edu>
Closes#15409 from bkpathak/SPARK-14761.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SQLConf is session-scoped and mutable. However, we do have the requirement for a static SQL conf, which is global and immutable, e.g. the `schemaStringThreshold` in `HiveExternalCatalog`, the flag to enable/disable hive support, the global temp view database in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897.
Actually we've already implemented static SQL conf implicitly via `SparkConf`, this PR just make it explicit and expose it to users, so that they can see the config value via SQL command or `SparkSession.conf`, and forbid users to set/unset static SQL conf.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests in SQLConfSuite
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#15295 from cloud-fan/global-conf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The root cause that we would ignore SparkConf when launching JVM is that SparkConf require JVM to be created first. https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/pyspark/conf.py#L106
In this PR, I would defer the launching of JVM until SparkContext is created so that we can pass SparkConf to JVM correctly.
## How was this patch tested?
Use the example code in the description of SPARK-17387,
```
$ SPARK_HOME=$PWD PYTHONPATH=python:python/lib/py4j-0.10.3-src.zip python
Python 2.7.12 (default, Jul 1 2016, 15:12:24)
[GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from pyspark import SparkContext
>>> from pyspark import SparkConf
>>> conf = SparkConf().set("spark.driver.memory", "4g")
>>> sc = SparkContext(conf=conf)
```
And verify the spark.driver.memory is correctly picked up.
```
...op/ -Xmx4g org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit --conf spark.driver.memory=4g pyspark-shell
```
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#14959 from zjffdu/SPARK-17387.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Quoted from JIRA description:
Calling repartition on a PySpark RDD to increase the number of partitions results in highly skewed partition sizes, with most having 0 rows. The repartition method should evenly spread out the rows across the partitions, and this behavior is correctly seen on the Scala side.
Please reference the following code for a reproducible example of this issue:
num_partitions = 20000
a = sc.parallelize(range(int(1e6)), 2) # start with 2 even partitions
l = a.repartition(num_partitions).glom().map(len).collect() # get length of each partition
min(l), max(l), sum(l)/len(l), len(l) # skewed!
In Scala's `repartition` code, we will distribute elements evenly across output partitions. However, the RDD from Python is serialized as a single binary data, so the distribution fails. We need to convert the RDD in Python to java object before repartitioning.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#15389 from viirya/pyspark-rdd-repartition.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
address post hoc review comments for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#15424 from cloud-fan/global-temp-view.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgraded to a newer version of Pyrolite which supports serialization of a BinaryType StructField for PySpark.SQL
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test which fails with a raised ValueError when using the previous version of Pyrolite 4.9 and Python3
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#15386 from BryanCutler/pyrolite-upgrade-SPARK-17808.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When I was creating the example code for SPARK-10496, I realized it was pretty convoluted to define the frame boundaries for window functions when there is no partition column or ordering column. The reason is that we don't provide a way to create a WindowSpec directly with the frame boundaries. We can trivially improve this by adding rowsBetween and rangeBetween to Window object.
As an example, to compute cumulative sum using the natural ordering, before this pr:
```
df.select('key, sum("value").over(Window.partitionBy(lit(1)).rowsBetween(Long.MinValue, 0)))
```
After this pr:
```
df.select('key, sum("value").over(Window.rowsBetween(Long.MinValue, 0)))
```
Note that you could argue there is no point specifying a window frame without partitionBy/orderBy -- but it is strange that only rowsBetween and rangeBetween are not the only two APIs not available.
This also fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17656 (removing _root_.scala).
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to compute cumulative sum in DataFrameWindowSuite for Scala/Java and tests.py for Python.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#15412 from rxin/SPARK-17844.
