## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This test re-enables the `analyze MetastoreRelations` in `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.StatisticsSuite`.
The flakiness of this test was traced back to a shared configuration option, `hive.exec.compress.output`, in `TestHive`. This property was set to `true` by the `HiveCompatibilitySuite`. I have added configuration resetting logic to `HiveComparisonTest`, in order to prevent such a thing from happening again.
## How was this patch tested?
Is a test.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#13498 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15011.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the DataFrameReader/Writer has method that are needed for streaming and non-streaming DFs. This is quite awkward because each method in them through runtime exception for one case or the other. So rather having half the methods throw runtime exceptions, its just better to have a different reader/writer API for streams.
- [x] Python API!!
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests + two sets of unit tests for DataFrameReader/Writer and DataStreamReader/Writer.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#13653 from tdas/SPARK-15933.
To try to eliminate redundant code to traverse the RDD dependency graph,
this PR creates a new function getShuffleDependencies that returns
shuffle dependencies that are immediate parents of a given RDD. This
new function is used by getParentStages and
getAncestorShuffleDependencies.
Author: Kay Ousterhout <kayousterhout@gmail.com>
Closes#13646 from kayousterhout/SPARK-15927.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr sets the default number of partitions when reading parquet schemas.
SQLContext#read#parquet currently yields at least n_executors * n_cores tasks even if parquet data consist of a single small file. This issue could increase the latency for small jobs.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and checked.
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
Closes#13137 from maropu/SPARK-15247.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Take the following directory layout as an example:
```
dir/
+- p0=0/
|-_metadata
+- p1=0/
|-part-00001.parquet
|-part-00002.parquet
|-...
```
The `_metadata` file under `p0=0` shouldn't fail partition discovery.
This PR filters output all metadata files whose names start with `_` while doing partition discovery.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit test added in `ParquetPartitionDiscoverySuite`.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#13623 from liancheng/spark-15895-partition-disco-no-metafiles.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To uncache a table, we have three different ways:
- _SQL interface_: `UNCACHE TABLE`
- _DataSet API_: `sparkSession.catalog.uncacheTable`
- _DataSet API_: `sparkSession.table(tableName).unpersist()`
When the table is not cached,
- _SQL interface_: `UNCACHE TABLE non-cachedTable` -> **no error message**
- _Dataset API_: `sparkSession.catalog.uncacheTable("non-cachedTable")` -> **report a strange error message:**
```requirement failed: Table [a: int] is not cached```
- _Dataset API_: `sparkSession.table("non-cachedTable").unpersist()` -> **no error message**
This PR will make them consistent. No operation if the table has already been uncached.
In addition, this PR also removes `uncacheQuery` and renames `tryUncacheQuery` to `uncacheQuery`, and documents it that it's noop if the table has already been uncached
#### How was this patch tested?
Improved the existing test case for verifying the cases when the table has not been cached.
Also added test cases for verifying the cases when the table does not exist
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#13593 from gatorsmile/uncacheNonCachedTable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`DataFrame` with plan overriding `sameResult` but not using canonicalized plan to compare can't cacheTable.
The example is like:
```
val localRelation = Seq(1, 2, 3).toDF()
localRelation.createOrReplaceTempView("localRelation")
spark.catalog.cacheTable("localRelation")
assert(
localRelation.queryExecution.withCachedData.collect {
case i: InMemoryRelation => i
}.size == 1)
```
and this will fail as:
```
ArrayBuffer() had size 0 instead of expected size 1
```
The reason is that when do `spark.catalog.cacheTable("localRelation")`, `CacheManager` tries to cache for the plan wrapped by `SubqueryAlias` but when planning for the DataFrame `localRelation`, `CacheManager` tries to find cached table for the not-wrapped plan because the plan for DataFrame `localRelation` is not wrapped.
Some plans like `LocalRelation`, `LogicalRDD`, etc. override `sameResult` method, but not use canonicalized plan to compare so the `CacheManager` can't detect the plans are the same.
This pr modifies them to use canonicalized plan when override `sameResult` method.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to check if DataFrame with plan overriding sameResult but not using canonicalized plan to compare can cacheTable.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#13638 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-15915.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When fetching the partitioned table, the output contains wrong results. The order of partition key values do not match the order of partition key columns in output schema. For example,
```SQL
CREATE TABLE table_with_partition(c1 string) PARTITIONED BY (p1 string,p2 string,p3 string,p4 string,p5 string)
INSERT OVERWRITE TABLE table_with_partition PARTITION (p1='a',p2='b',p3='c',p4='d',p5='e') SELECT 'blarr'
SELECT p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, c1 FROM table_with_partition
```
```
+---+---+---+---+---+-----+
| p1| p2| p3| p4| p5| c1|
+---+---+---+---+---+-----+
| d| e| c| b| a|blarr|
+---+---+---+---+---+-----+
```
The expected result should be
```
+---+---+---+---+---+-----+
| p1| p2| p3| p4| p5| c1|
+---+---+---+---+---+-----+
| a| b| c| d| e|blarr|
+---+---+---+---+---+-----+
```
This PR is to fix this by enforcing the order matches the table partition definition.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case into `SQLQuerySuite`
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13400 from gatorsmile/partitionedTableFetch.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Another PR to clean up recent build warnings. This particularly cleans up several instances of the old accumulator API usage in tests that are straightforward to update. I think this qualifies as "minor".
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#13642 from srowen/BuildWarnings.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Revert partial changes in SPARK-12600, and add some deprecated method back to SQLContext for backward source code compatibility.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#13637 from clockfly/SPARK-15914.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Just minor doc fix.
\cc yhuai
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#13659 from zjffdu/doc_fix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should mention that users can build Spark using multiple threads to decrease build times; either here or in "Building Spark"
## How was this patch tested?
Built on machines with between one core to 192 cores using mvn -T 1C and observed faster build times with no loss in stability
In response to the question here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15821 I think we should suggest this option as we know it works for Spark and can result in faster builds
Author: Adam Roberts <aroberts@uk.ibm.com>
Closes#13562 from a-roberts/patch-3.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR just enables tests for sql/streaming.py and also fixes the failures.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#13655 from zsxwing/python-streaming-test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
minor typo
## How was this patch tested?
minor typo in the doc, should be self explanatory
Author: Mortada Mehyar <mortada.mehyar@gmail.com>
Closes#13639 from mortada/typo.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In our encoder framework, we imply that serializer expressions should use `BoundReference` to refer to the input object, and a lot of codes depend on this contract(e.g. ExpressionEncoder.tuple). This PR adds some document and assert in `ExpressionEncoder` to make it clearer.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13648 from cloud-fan/comment.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkSession.catalog.listFunctions currently returns all functions, including the list of built-in functions. This makes the method not as useful because anytime it is run the result set contains over 100 built-in functions.
## How was this patch tested?
CatalogSuite
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Closes#13413 from techaddict/SPARK-15663.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now we have PySpark picklers for new and old vector/matrix, individually. However, they are all implemented under `PythonMLlibAPI`. To separate spark.mllib from spark.ml, we should implement the picklers of new vector/matrix under `spark.ml.python` instead.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#13219 from viirya/pyspark-pickler-ml.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**Issue:** Got wrong results or strange errors when append data to a table with mismatched file format.
_Example 1: PARQUET -> CSV_
```Scala
createDF(0, 9).write.format("parquet").saveAsTable("appendParquetToOrc")
createDF(10, 19).write.mode(SaveMode.Append).format("orc").saveAsTable("appendParquetToOrc")
```
Error we got:
```
Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 0 in stage 2.0 failed 1 times, most recent failure: Lost task 0.0 in stage 2.0 (TID 2, localhost): java.lang.RuntimeException: file:/private/var/folders/4b/sgmfldk15js406vk7lw5llzw0000gn/T/warehouse-bc8fedf2-aa6a-4002-a18b-524c6ac859d4/appendorctoparquet/part-r-00000-c0e3f365-1d46-4df5-a82c-b47d7af9feb9.snappy.orc is not a Parquet file. expected magic number at tail [80, 65, 82, 49] but found [79, 82, 67, 23]
```
_Example 2: Json -> CSV_
```Scala
createDF(0, 9).write.format("json").saveAsTable("appendJsonToCSV")
createDF(10, 19).write.mode(SaveMode.Append).format("parquet").saveAsTable("appendJsonToCSV")
```
No exception, but wrong results:
```
+----+----+
| c1| c2|
+----+----+
|null|null|
|null|null|
|null|null|
|null|null|
| 0|str0|
| 1|str1|
| 2|str2|
| 3|str3|
| 4|str4|
| 5|str5|
| 6|str6|
| 7|str7|
| 8|str8|
| 9|str9|
+----+----+
```
_Example 3: Json -> Text_
```Scala
createDF(0, 9).write.format("json").saveAsTable("appendJsonToText")
createDF(10, 19).write.mode(SaveMode.Append).format("text").saveAsTable("appendJsonToText")
```
Error we got:
```
Text data source supports only a single column, and you have 2 columns.
```
This PR is to issue an exception with appropriate error messages.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13546 from gatorsmile/fileFormatCheck.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enforces schema check when converting DataFrame to Dataset using Kryo encoder. For example.
**Before the change:**
Schema is NOT checked when converting DataFrame to Dataset using kryo encoder.
```
scala> case class B(b: Int)
scala> implicit val encoder = Encoders.kryo[B]
scala> val df = Seq((1)).toDF("b")
scala> val ds = df.as[B] // Schema compatibility is NOT checked
```
**After the change:**
Report AnalysisException since the schema is NOT compatible.
```
scala> val ds = Seq((1)).toDF("b").as[B]
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'CAST(`b` AS BINARY)' due to data type mismatch: cannot cast IntegerType to BinaryType;
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes#13632 from clockfly/spark-15910.
The DataFrameSuite regression tests for SPARK-13774 fail in my environment because they attempt to glob over all of `/mnt` and some of the subdirectories restrictive permissions which cause the test to fail.
This patch rewrites those tests to remove all environment-specific assumptions; the tests now create their own unique temporary paths for use in the tests.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#13649 from JoshRosen/SPARK-15929.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR replaces `registerTempTable` with `createOrReplaceTempView` as a follow-up task of #12945.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing SparkR tests.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#13644 from liancheng/spark-15925-temp-view-for-r.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Right now, Spark 2.0 does not load hive-site.xml. Based on users' feedback, it seems make sense to still load this conf file.
This PR adds a `hadoopConf` API in `SharedState`, which is `sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration` by default. When users are under hive context, `SharedState.hadoopConf` will load hive-site.xml and append its configs to `sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration`.
When we need to read hadoop config in spark sql, we should call `SessionState.newHadoopConf`, which contains `sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration`, hive-site.xml and sql configs.
## How was this patch tested?
new test in `HiveDataFrameSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13611 from cloud-fan/hive-site.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
ContinuousQueries have names that are unique across all the active ones. However, when queries are rapidly restarted with same name, it causes races conditions with the listener. A listener event from a stopped query can arrive after the query has been restarted, leading to complexities in monitoring infrastructure.
Along with this change, I have also consolidated all the messy code paths to start queries with different sinks.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests, and existing unit tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#13613 from tdas/SPARK-15889.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to set the number of parallelism to prevent file listing in `listLeafFilesInParallel` from generating many tasks in case of large #defaultParallelism.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually checked
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
Closes#13444 from maropu/SPARK-15530.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When creating a Hive Table (not data source tables), a common error users might make is to specify an existing column name as a partition column. Below is what Hive returns in this case:
```
hive> CREATE TABLE partitioned (id bigint, data string) PARTITIONED BY (data string, part string);
FAILED: SemanticException [Error 10035]: Column repeated in partitioning columns
```
Currently, the error we issued is very confusing:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException: MetaException(message:For direct MetaStore DB connections, we don't support retries at the client level.);
```
This PR is to fix the above issue by capturing the usage error in `Parser`.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case to `DDLCommandSuite`
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13415 from gatorsmile/partitionColumnsInTableSchema.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch does some replacing (as `streaming Datasets/DataFrames` is the term we've chosen in [SPARK-15593](00c310133d)):
- `continuous queries` -> `streaming Datasets/DataFrames`
- `non-continuous queries` -> `non-streaming Datasets/DataFrames`
This patch also adds `test("check foreach() can only be called on streaming Datasets/DataFrames")`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>
Closes#13595 from lw-lin/continuous-queries-to-streaming-dss-dfs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Unblock some of the useful repl commands. like, "implicits", "javap", "power", "type", "kind". As they are useful and fully functional and part of scala/scala project, I see no harm in having them either.
Verbatim paste form JIRA description.
"implicits", "javap", "power", "type", "kind" commands in repl are blocked. However, they work fine in all cases I have tried. It is clear we don't support them as they are part of the scala/scala repl project. What is the harm in unblocking them, given they are useful ?
In previous versions of spark we disabled these commands because it was difficult to support them without customization and the associated maintenance. Since the code base of scala repl was actually ported and maintained under spark source. Now that is not the situation and one can benefit from these commands in Spark REPL as much as in scala repl.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and manual, by trying out all of the above commands.
P.S. Symantics of reset are to be discussed in a separate issue.
Author: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Closes#13437 from ScrapCodes/SPARK-15697/repl-unblock-commands.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Dispatcher.stopped` is guarded by `this`, but it is used without synchronization in `postMessage` function. This PR fixes this and also the exception message became more accurate.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing Jenkins tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13634 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15913.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's similar to the bug fixed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13425, we should consider null object and wrap the `CreateStruct` with `If` to do null check.
This PR also improves the test framework to test the objects of `Dataset[T]` directly, instead of calling `toDF` and compare the rows.
## How was this patch tested?
new test in `DatasetAggregatorSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13553 from cloud-fan/agg-null.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add new desired executor number to make the log message less ambiguous.
## How was this patch tested?
This is a trivial change
Author: Peter Ableda <abledapeter@gmail.com>
Closes#13552 from peterableda/patch-1.
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes the COUNT bug in the `RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery` rule.
After this change, the rule tests the expression at the root of the correlated subquery to determine whether the expression returns `NULL` on empty input. If the expression does not return `NULL`, the rule generates additional logic in the `Project` operator above the rewritten subquery. This additional logic intercepts `NULL` values coming from the outer join and replaces them with the value that the subquery's expression would return on empty input.
This PR takes over https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155. It only fixes an issue with `Literal` construction and style issues. All credits should go frreiss.
# How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests to cover all branches of the updated rule (see changes to `SubquerySuite`).
Ran all existing automated regression tests after merging with latest trunk.
Author: frreiss <frreiss@us.ibm.com>
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#13629 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15370-cleanup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If a cached `DataFrame` executed more than once and then do `uncacheTable` like the following:
```
val selectStar = sql("SELECT * FROM testData WHERE key = 1")
selectStar.createOrReplaceTempView("selectStar")
spark.catalog.cacheTable("selectStar")
checkAnswer(
selectStar,
Seq(Row(1, "1")))
spark.catalog.uncacheTable("selectStar")
checkAnswer(
selectStar,
Seq(Row(1, "1")))
```
, then the uncached `DataFrame` can't execute because of `Task not serializable` exception like:
```
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Task not serializable
at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.ensureSerializable(ClosureCleaner.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.org$apache$spark$util$ClosureCleaner$$clean(ClosureCleaner.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.clean(ClosureCleaner.scala:108)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.clean(SparkContext.scala:2038)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.runJob(SparkContext.scala:1897)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.runJob(SparkContext.scala:1912)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$collect$1.apply(RDD.scala:884)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:112)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.withScope(RDD.scala:357)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.collect(RDD.scala:883)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeCollect(SparkPlan.scala:290)
...
Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Accumulator must be registered before send to executor
at org.apache.spark.util.AccumulatorV2.writeReplace(AccumulatorV2.scala:153)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeWriteReplace(ObjectStreamClass.java:1118)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1136)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1548)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1432)
...
```
Notice that `DataFrame` uncached with `DataFrame.unpersist()` works, but with `spark.catalog.uncacheTable` doesn't work.
This pr reverts a part of cf38fe0 not to unregister `batchStats` accumulator, which is not needed to be unregistered here because it will be done by `ContextCleaner` after it is collected by GC.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to check if DataFrame can execute after uncacheTable and other existing tests.
But I made a test to check if the accumulator was cleared as `ignore` because the test would be flaky.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#13596 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-15870.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `AFTAggregator` is not being merged correctly. For example, if there is any single empty partition in the data, this creates an `AFTAggregator` with zero total count which causes the exception below:
```
IllegalArgumentException: u'requirement failed: The number of instances should be greater than 0.0, but got 0.'
```
Please see [AFTSurvivalRegression.scala#L573-L575](6ecedf39b4/mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegression.scala (L573-L575)) as well.
Just to be clear, the python example `aft_survival_regression.py` seems using 5 rows. So, if there exist partitions more than 5, it throws the exception above since it contains empty partitions which results in an incorrectly merged `AFTAggregator`.
Executing `bin/spark-submit examples/src/main/python/ml/aft_survival_regression.py` on a machine with CPUs more than 5 is being failed because it creates tasks with some empty partitions with defualt configurations (AFAIK, it sets the parallelism level to the number of CPU cores).
## How was this patch tested?
An unit test in `AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala` and manually tested by `bin/spark-submit examples/src/main/python/ml/aft_survival_regression.py`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Author: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#13619 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-15892.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Queries with embedded existential sub-query predicates throws exception when building the physical plan.
Example failing query:
```SQL
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t1")
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t2")
scala> sql("select c1 from t1 where (case when c2 in (select c2 from t2) then 2 else 3 end) IN (select c2 from t1)").show()
Binding attribute, tree: c2#239
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: c2#239
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
...
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$.bindReference(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$$anonfun$4.apply(HashJoin.scala:66)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$$anonfun$4.apply(HashJoin.scala:66)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:381)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:285)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$class.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$joins$HashJoin$$x$8(HashJoin.scala:66)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$joins$HashJoin$$x$8$lzycompute(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$joins$HashJoin$$x$8(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$class.buildKeys(HashJoin.scala:63)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.buildKeys$lzycompute(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.buildKeys(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.requiredChildDistribution(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:52)
```
**Problem description:**
When the left hand side expression of an existential sub-query predicate contains another embedded sub-query predicate, the RewritePredicateSubquery optimizer rule does not resolve the embedded sub-query expressions into existential joins.For example, the above query has the following optimized plan, which fails during physical plan build.
```SQL
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [_1#224 AS c1#227]
+- Join LeftSemi, (CASE WHEN predicate-subquery#255 [(_2#225 = c2#239)] THEN 2 ELSE 3 END = c2#228#262)
: +- SubqueryAlias predicate-subquery#255 [(_2#225 = c2#239)]
: +- LocalRelation [c2#239]
:- LocalRelation [_1#224, _2#225]
+- LocalRelation [c2#228#262]
== Physical Plan ==
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: c2#239
```
**Solution:**
In RewritePredicateSubquery, before rewriting the outermost predicate sub-query, resolve any embedded existential sub-queries. The Optimized plan for the above query after the changes looks like below.
```SQL
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [_1#224 AS c1#227]
+- Join LeftSemi, (CASE WHEN exists#285 THEN 2 ELSE 3 END = c2#228#284)
:- Join ExistenceJoin(exists#285), (_2#225 = c2#239)
: :- LocalRelation [_1#224, _2#225]
: +- LocalRelation [c2#239]
+- LocalRelation [c2#228#284]
== Physical Plan ==
*Project [_1#224 AS c1#227]
+- *BroadcastHashJoin [CASE WHEN exists#285 THEN 2 ELSE 3 END], [c2#228#284], LeftSemi, BuildRight
:- *BroadcastHashJoin [_2#225], [c2#239], ExistenceJoin(exists#285), BuildRight
: :- LocalTableScan [_1#224, _2#225]
: +- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as bigint)))
: +- LocalTableScan [c2#239]
+- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as bigint)))
+- LocalTableScan [c2#228#284]
+- LocalTableScan [c222#36], [[111],[222]]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases in SubquerySuite.scala
Author: Ioana Delaney <ioanamdelaney@gmail.com>
Closes#13570 from ioana-delaney/fixEmbedSubPredV1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes the COUNT bug in the `RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery` rule.
After this change, the rule tests the expression at the root of the correlated subquery to determine whether the expression returns NULL on empty input. If the expression does not return NULL, the rule generates additional logic in the Project operator above the rewritten subquery. This additional logic intercepts NULL values coming from the outer join and replaces them with the value that the subquery's expression would return on empty input.
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests to cover all branches of the updated rule (see changes to `SubquerySuite.scala`).
Ran all existing automated regression tests after merging with latest trunk.
Author: frreiss <frreiss@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13155 from frreiss/master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove deprecated support for `zk://` master (`mesos://zk//` remains supported)
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#13625 from srowen/SPARK-15876.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Deprecate old Java accumulator API; should use Scala now
- Update Java tests and examples
- Don't bother testing old accumulator API in Java 8 (too)
- (fix a misspelling too)
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#13606 from srowen/SPARK-15086.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK_MASTER_IP is a deprecated environment variable. It is replaced by SPARK_MASTER_HOST according to MasterArguments.scala.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually verified.
Author: bomeng <bmeng@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13543 from bomeng/SPARK-15806.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Like `SPARK_JAVA_OPTS` and `SPARK_CLASSPATH`, we will remove the document for `SPARK_WORKER_INSTANCES` to discourage user not to use them. If they are actually used, SparkConf will show a warning message as before.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Author: bomeng <bmeng@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13533 from bomeng/SPARK-15781.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These tests weren't properly using `LocalSparkContext` so weren't cleaning up correctly when tests failed.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins.
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes#13602 from squito/SPARK-15878_cleanup_replaylistener.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds codahale metrics for the codegen source text size and how long it takes to compile. The size is particularly interesting, since the JVM does have hard limits on how large methods can get.
To simplify, I added the metrics under a statically-initialized source that is always registered with SparkEnv.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#13586 from ericl/spark-15860.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds support for radix sort of nullable long fields. When a sort field is null and radix sort is enabled, we keep nulls in a separate region of the sort buffer so that radix sort does not need to deal with them. This also has performance benefits when sorting smaller integer types, since the current representation of nulls in two's complement (Long.MIN_VALUE) otherwise forces a full-width radix sort.
This strategy for nulls does mean the sort is no longer stable. cc davies
## How was this patch tested?
Existing randomized sort tests for correctness. I also tested some TPCDS queries and there does not seem to be any significant regression for non-null sorts.
Some test queries (best of 5 runs each).
Before change:
scala> val start = System.nanoTime; spark.range(5000000).selectExpr("if(id > 5, cast(hash(id) as long), NULL) as h").coalesce(1).orderBy("h").collect(); (System.nanoTime - start) / 1e6
start: Long = 3190437233227987
res3: Double = 4716.471091
After change:
scala> val start = System.nanoTime; spark.range(5000000).selectExpr("if(id > 5, cast(hash(id) as long), NULL) as h").coalesce(1).orderBy("h").collect(); (System.nanoTime - start) / 1e6
start: Long = 3190367870952791
res4: Double = 2981.143045
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#13161 from ericl/sc-2998.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's easy for users to call `range(...).as[Long]` to get typed Dataset, and don't worth an API breaking change. This PR reverts it.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13605 from cloud-fan/range.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These were not updated after performance improvements. To make updating them easier, I also moved the results from inline comments out into a file, which is auto-generated when the benchmark is re-run.
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#13607 from ericl/sc-3538.