## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for `Null` type in the `schemaFor` method for Scala reflection.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20219 from mgaido91/SPARK-23025.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add kafka source and sink for continuous processing. This involves two small changes to the execution engine:
* Bring data reader close() into the normal data reader thread to avoid thread safety issues.
* Fix up the semantics of the RECONFIGURING StreamExecution state. State updates are now atomic, and we don't have to deal with swallowing an exception.
## How was this patch tested?
new unit tests
Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>
Closes#20096 from jose-torres/continuous-kafka.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(courtesy of liancheng)
Spark SQL supports both global aggregation and grouping aggregation. Global aggregation always return a single row with the initial aggregation state as the output, even there are zero input rows. Spark implements this by simply checking the number of grouping keys and treats an aggregation as a global aggregation if it has zero grouping keys.
However, this simple principle drops the ball in the following case:
```scala
spark.emptyDataFrame.dropDuplicates().agg(count($"*") as "c").show()
// +---+
// | c |
// +---+
// | 1 |
// +---+
```
The reason is that:
1. `df.dropDuplicates()` is roughly translated into something equivalent to:
```scala
val allColumns = df.columns.map { col }
df.groupBy(allColumns: _*).agg(allColumns.head, allColumns.tail: _*)
```
This translation is implemented in the rule `ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate`.
2. `spark.emptyDataFrame` contains zero columns and zero rows.
Therefore, rule `ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate` makes a confusing transformation roughly equivalent to the following one:
```scala
spark.emptyDataFrame.dropDuplicates()
=> spark.emptyDataFrame.groupBy().agg(Map.empty[String, String])
```
The above transformation is confusing because the resulting aggregate operator contains no grouping keys (because `emptyDataFrame` contains no columns), and gets recognized as a global aggregation. As a result, Spark SQL allocates a single row filled by the initial aggregation state and uses it as the output, and returns a wrong result.
To fix this issue, this PR tweaks `ReplaceDeduplicateWithAggregate` by appending a literal `1` to the grouping key list of the resulting `Aggregate` operator when the input plan contains zero output columns. In this way, `spark.emptyDataFrame.dropDuplicates()` is now translated into a grouping aggregation, roughly depicted as:
```scala
spark.emptyDataFrame.dropDuplicates()
=> spark.emptyDataFrame.groupBy(lit(1)).agg(Map.empty[String, String])
```
Which is now properly treated as a grouping aggregation and returns the correct answer.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests added
Author: Feng Liu <fengliu@databricks.com>
Closes#20174 from liufengdb/fix-duplicate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is mostly from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
The wrapper solution is pretty good for string/binary type, as the ORC column vector doesn't keep bytes in a continuous memory region, and has a significant overhead when copying the data to Spark columnar batch. For other cases, the wrapper solution is almost same with the current solution.
I think we can treat the wrapper solution as a baseline and keep improving the writing to Spark solution.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#20205 from cloud-fan/orc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec` should be `BroadcastHashJoinExec`
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#20202 from cloud-fan/typo.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In current implementation of RDD.take, we overestimate the number of partitions we need to try by 50%:
`(1.5 * num * partsScanned / buf.size).toInt`
However, when the number is small, the result of `.toInt` is not what we want.
E.g, 2.9 will become 2, which should be 3.
Use Math.ceil to fix the problem.
Also clean up the code in RDD.scala.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>
Closes#20200 from gengliangwang/Take.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds an ORC columnar-batch reader to native `OrcFileFormat`. Since both Spark `ColumnarBatch` and ORC `RowBatch` are used together, it is faster than the current Spark implementation. This replaces the prior PR, #17924.
Also, this PR adds `OrcReadBenchmark` to show the performance improvement.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing test cases.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#19943 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16060.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the warning: Couldn't find corresponding Hive SerDe for data source provider org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc.
## How was this patch tested?
test("SPARK-22972: hive orc source")
assert(HiveSerDe.sourceToSerDe("org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc")
.equals(HiveSerDe.sourceToSerDe("orc")))
Author: xubo245 <601450868@qq.com>
Closes#20165 from xubo245/HiveSerDe.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support for v2 data sources in microbatch streaming.
## How was this patch tested?
A very basic new unit test on the toy v2 implementation of rate source. Once we have a v1 source fully migrated to v2, we'll need to do more detailed compatibility testing.
Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>
Closes#20097 from jose-torres/v2-impl.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Deprecate attemptId in StageInfo and add `def attemptNumber() = attemptId`
2. Replace usage of stageAttemptId with stageAttemptNumber
## How was this patch tested?
I manually checked the compiler warning info
Author: Xianjin YE <advancedxy@gmail.com>
Closes#20178 from advancedxy/SPARK-22952.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**The current shuffle planning logic**
1. Each operator specifies the distribution requirements for its children, via the `Distribution` interface.
2. Each operator specifies its output partitioning, via the `Partitioning` interface.
3. `Partitioning.satisfy` determines whether a `Partitioning` can satisfy a `Distribution`.
4. For each operator, check each child of it, add a shuffle node above the child if the child partitioning can not satisfy the required distribution.
5. For each operator, check if its children's output partitionings are compatible with each other, via the `Partitioning.compatibleWith`.
6. If the check in 5 failed, add a shuffle above each child.
7. try to eliminate the shuffles added in 6, via `Partitioning.guarantees`.
This design has a major problem with the definition of "compatible".
`Partitioning.compatibleWith` is not well defined, ideally a `Partitioning` can't know if it's compatible with other `Partitioning`, without more information from the operator. For example, `t1 join t2 on t1.a = t2.b`, `HashPartitioning(a, 10)` should be compatible with `HashPartitioning(b, 10)` under this case, but the partitioning itself doesn't know it.
As a result, currently `Partitioning.compatibleWith` always return false except for literals, which make it almost useless. This also means, if an operator has distribution requirements for multiple children, Spark always add shuffle nodes to all the children(although some of them can be eliminated). However, there is no guarantee that the children's output partitionings are compatible with each other after adding these shuffles, we just assume that the operator will only specify `ClusteredDistribution` for multiple children.
I think it's very hard to guarantee children co-partition for all kinds of operators, and we can not even give a clear definition about co-partition between distributions like `ClusteredDistribution(a,b)` and `ClusteredDistribution(c)`.
I think we should drop the "compatible" concept in the distribution model, and let the operator achieve the co-partition requirement by special distribution requirements.
**Proposed shuffle planning logic after this PR**
(The first 4 are same as before)
1. Each operator specifies the distribution requirements for its children, via the `Distribution` interface.
2. Each operator specifies its output partitioning, via the `Partitioning` interface.
3. `Partitioning.satisfy` determines whether a `Partitioning` can satisfy a `Distribution`.
4. For each operator, check each child of it, add a shuffle node above the child if the child partitioning can not satisfy the required distribution.
5. For each operator, check if its children's output partitionings have the same number of partitions.
6. If the check in 5 failed, pick the max number of partitions from children's output partitionings, and add shuffle to child whose number of partitions doesn't equal to the max one.
The new distribution model is very simple, we only have one kind of relationship, which is `Partitioning.satisfy`. For multiple children, Spark only guarantees they have the same number of partitions, and it's the operator's responsibility to leverage this guarantee to achieve more complicated requirements. For example, non-broadcast joins can use the newly added `HashPartitionedDistribution` to achieve co-partition.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19080 from cloud-fan/exchange.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The following SQL query should return zero rows, but in Spark it actually returns one row:
```
SELECT 1 from (
SELECT 1 AS z,
MIN(a.x)
FROM (select 1 as x) a
WHERE false
) b
where b.z != b.z
```
The problem stems from the `PushDownPredicate` rule: when this rule encounters a filter on top of an Aggregate operator, e.g. `Filter(Agg(...))`, it removes the original filter and adds a new filter onto Aggregate's child, e.g. `Agg(Filter(...))`. This is sometimes okay, but the case above is a counterexample: because there is no explicit `GROUP BY`, we are implicitly computing a global aggregate over the entire table so the original filter was not acting like a `HAVING` clause filtering the number of groups: if we push this filter then it fails to actually reduce the cardinality of the Aggregate output, leading to the wrong answer.
In 2016 I fixed a similar problem involving invalid pushdowns of data-independent filters (filters which reference no columns of the filtered relation). There was additional discussion after my fix was merged which pointed out that my patch was an incomplete fix (see #15289), but it looks I must have either misunderstood the comment or forgot to follow up on the additional points raised there.
This patch fixes the problem by choosing to never push down filters in cases where there are no grouping expressions. Since there are no grouping keys, the only columns are aggregate columns and we can't push filters defined over aggregate results, so this change won't cause us to miss out on any legitimate pushdown opportunities.
## How was this patch tested?
New regression tests in `SQLQueryTestSuite` and `FilterPushdownSuite`.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#20180 from JoshRosen/SPARK-22983-dont-push-filters-beneath-aggs-with-empty-grouping-expressions.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Seems we can avoid type dispatch for each value when Java objection (from Pyrolite) -> Spark's internal data format because we know the schema ahead.
I manually performed the benchmark as below:
```scala
test("EvaluatePython.fromJava / EvaluatePython.makeFromJava") {
val numRows = 1000 * 1000
val numFields = 30
val random = new Random(System.nanoTime())
val types = Array(
BooleanType, ByteType, FloatType, DoubleType, IntegerType, LongType, ShortType,
DecimalType.ShortDecimal, DecimalType.IntDecimal, DecimalType.ByteDecimal,
DecimalType.FloatDecimal, DecimalType.LongDecimal, new DecimalType(5, 2),
new DecimalType(12, 2), new DecimalType(30, 10), CalendarIntervalType)
val schema = RandomDataGenerator.randomSchema(random, numFields, types)
val rows = mutable.ArrayBuffer.empty[Array[Any]]
var i = 0
while (i < numRows) {
val row = RandomDataGenerator.randomRow(random, schema)
rows += row.toSeq.toArray
i += 1
}
val benchmark = new Benchmark("EvaluatePython.fromJava / EvaluatePython.makeFromJava", numRows)
benchmark.addCase("Before - EvaluatePython.fromJava", 3) { _ =>
var i = 0
while (i < numRows) {
EvaluatePython.fromJava(rows(i), schema)
i += 1
}
}
benchmark.addCase("After - EvaluatePython.makeFromJava", 3) { _ =>
val fromJava = EvaluatePython.makeFromJava(schema)
var i = 0
while (i < numRows) {
fromJava(rows(i))
i += 1
}
}
benchmark.run()
}
```
```
EvaluatePython.fromJava / EvaluatePython.makeFromJava: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before - EvaluatePython.fromJava 1265 / 1346 0.8 1264.8 1.0X
After - EvaluatePython.makeFromJava 571 / 649 1.8 570.8 2.2X
```
If the structure is nested, I think the advantage should be larger than this.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover this. Also, I manually checked if the values from before / after are actually same via `assert` when performing the benchmarks.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#20172 from HyukjinKwon/type-dispatch-python-eval.
[SPARK-21786][SQL] When acquiring 'compressionCodecClassName' in 'ParquetOptions', `parquet.compression` needs to be considered.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since Hive 1.1, Hive allows users to set parquet compression codec via table-level properties parquet.compression. See the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7858 . We do support orc.compression for ORC. Thus, for external users, it is more straightforward to support both. See the stackflow question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36941122/spark-sql-ignores-parquet-compression-propertie-specified-in-tblproperties
In Spark side, our table-level compression conf compression was added by #11464 since Spark 2.0.
We need to support both table-level conf. Users might also use session-level conf spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec. The priority rule will be like
If other compression codec configuration was found through hive or parquet, the precedence would be compression, parquet.compression, spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec. Acceptable values include: none, uncompressed, snappy, gzip, lzo.
The rule for Parquet is consistent with the ORC after the change.
Changes:
1.Increased acquiring 'compressionCodecClassName' from `parquet.compression`,and the precedence order is `compression`,`parquet.compression`,`spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec`, just like what we do in `OrcOptions`.
2.Change `spark.sql.parquet.compression.codec` to support "none".Actually in `ParquetOptions`,we do support "none" as equivalent to "uncompressed", but it does not allowed to configured to "none".
3.Change `compressionCode` to `compressionCodecClassName`.
## How was this patch tested?
Add test.
Author: fjh100456 <fu.jinhua6@zte.com.cn>
Closes#20076 from fjh100456/ParquetOptionIssue.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr modified `elt` to output binary for binary inputs.
`elt` in the current master always output data as a string. But, in some databases (e.g., MySQL), if all inputs are binary, `elt` also outputs binary (Also, this might be a small surprise).
This pr is related to #19977.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `SQLQueryTestSuite` and `TypeCoercionSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20135 from maropu/SPARK-22937.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed the issue when casting arrays into strings;
```
scala> val df = spark.range(10).select('id.cast("integer")).agg(collect_list('id).as('ids))
scala> df.write.saveAsTable("t")
scala> sql("SELECT cast(ids as String) FROM t").show(false)
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|ids |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeArrayData8bc285df|
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
This pr modified the result into;
```
+------------------------------+
|ids |
+------------------------------+
|[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]|
+------------------------------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CastSuite` and `SQLQuerySuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#20024 from maropu/SPARK-22825.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
32bit Int was used for row rank.
That overflowed in a dataframe with more than 2B rows.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test, but ignored, as it takes 4 minutes.
Author: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>
Closes#20152 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-22957.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently Scala users can use UDF like
```
val foo = udf((i: Int) => Math.random() + i).asNondeterministic
df.select(foo('a))
```
Python users can also do it with similar APIs. However Java users can't do it, we should add Java UDF APIs in the functions object.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#20141 from cloud-fan/udf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
R Structured Streaming API for withWatermark, trigger, partitionBy
## How was this patch tested?
manual, unit tests
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#20129 from felixcheung/rwater.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
move `ColumnVector` and related classes to `org.apache.spark.sql.vectorized`, and improve the document.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#20116 from cloud-fan/column-vector.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When overwriting a partitioned table with dynamic partition columns, the behavior is different between data source and hive tables.
data source table: delete all partition directories that match the static partition values provided in the insert statement.
hive table: only delete partition directories which have data written into it
This PR adds a new config to make users be able to choose hive's behavior.
## How was this patch tested?
new tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#18714 from cloud-fan/overwrite-partition.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, our CREATE TABLE syntax require the EXACT order of clauses. It is pretty hard to remember the exact order. Thus, this PR is to make optional clauses order insensitive for `CREATE TABLE` SQL statement.
```
CREATE [TEMPORARY] TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] [db_name.]table_name
[(col_name1 col_type1 [COMMENT col_comment1], ...)]
USING datasource
[OPTIONS (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
[PARTITIONED BY (col_name1, col_name2, ...)]
[CLUSTERED BY (col_name3, col_name4, ...) INTO num_buckets BUCKETS]
[LOCATION path]
[COMMENT table_comment]
[TBLPROPERTIES (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
[AS select_statement]
```
The proposal is to make the following clauses order insensitive.
```
[OPTIONS (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
[PARTITIONED BY (col_name1, col_name2, ...)]
[CLUSTERED BY (col_name3, col_name4, ...) INTO num_buckets BUCKETS]
[LOCATION path]
[COMMENT table_comment]
[TBLPROPERTIES (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
```
The same idea is also applicable to Create Hive Table.
```
CREATE [EXTERNAL] TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] [db_name.]table_name
[(col_name1[:] col_type1 [COMMENT col_comment1], ...)]
[COMMENT table_comment]
[PARTITIONED BY (col_name2[:] col_type2 [COMMENT col_comment2], ...)]
[ROW FORMAT row_format]
[STORED AS file_format]
[LOCATION path]
[TBLPROPERTIES (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
[AS select_statement]
```
The proposal is to make the following clauses order insensitive.
```
[COMMENT table_comment]
[PARTITIONED BY (col_name2[:] col_type2 [COMMENT col_comment2], ...)]
[ROW FORMAT row_format]
[STORED AS file_format]
[LOCATION path]
[TBLPROPERTIES (key1=val1, key2=val2, ...)]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20133 from gatorsmile/createDataSourceTableDDL.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
stageAttemptId added in TaskContext and corresponding construction modification
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test in TaskContextSuite, two cases are tested:
1. Normal case without failure
2. Exception case with resubmitted stages
Link to [SPARK-22897](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22897)
Author: Xianjin YE <advancedxy@gmail.com>
Closes#20082 from advancedxy/SPARK-22897.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change adds `ArrayType` support for working with Arrow in pyspark when creating a DataFrame, calling `toPandas()`, and using vectorized `pandas_udf`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new Python unit tests using Array data.
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#20114 from BryanCutler/arrow-ArrayType-support-SPARK-22530.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we do not guarantee an order evaluation of conjuncts in either Filter or Join operator. This is also true to the mainstream RDBMS vendors like DB2 and MS SQL Server. Thus, we should also push down the deterministic predicates that are after the first non-deterministic, if possible.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated the existing test cases.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20069 from gatorsmile/morePushDown.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is already test using window spilling, but the test coverage is not ideal.
In this PR the already existing test was fixed and additional cases added.
## How was this patch tested?
Automated: Pass the Jenkins.
Author: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Closes#20022 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-22363.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr modified `concat` to concat binary inputs into a single binary output.
`concat` in the current master always output data as a string. But, in some databases (e.g., PostgreSQL), if all inputs are binary, `concat` also outputs binary.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `SQLQueryTestSuite` and `TypeCoercionSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#19977 from maropu/SPARK-22771.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
ML regression package testsuite add StructuredStreaming test
In order to make testsuite easier to modify, new helper function added in `MLTest`:
```
def testTransformerByGlobalCheckFunc[A : Encoder](
dataframe: DataFrame,
transformer: Transformer,
firstResultCol: String,
otherResultCols: String*)
(globalCheckFunction: Seq[Row] => Unit): Unit
```
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: WeichenXu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Author: Bago Amirbekian <bago@databricks.com>
Closes#19979 from WeichenXu123/ml_stream_test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The issue has been raised in two Jira tickets: [SPARK-21657](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21657), [SPARK-16998](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16998). Basically, what happens is that in collection generators like explode/inline we create many rows from each row. Currently each exploded row contains also the column on which it was created. This causes, for example, if we have a 10k array in one row that this array will get copy 10k times - to each of the row. this results a qudratic memory consumption. However, it is a common case that the original column gets projected out after the explode, so we can avoid duplicating it.
In this solution we propose to identify this situation in the optimizer and turn on a flag for omitting the original column in the generation process.
## How was this patch tested?
1. We added a benchmark test to MiscBenchmark that shows x16 improvement in runtimes.
2. We ran some of the other tests in MiscBenchmark and they show 15% improvements.
3. We ran this code on a specific case from our production data with rows containing arrays of size ~200k and it reduced the runtime from 6 hours to 3 mins.
Author: oraviv <oraviv@paypal.com>
Author: uzadude <ohad.raviv@gmail.com>
Author: uzadude <15645757+uzadude@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#19683 from uzadude/optimize_explode.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When there are no broadcast hints, the current spark strategies will prefer to building the right side, without considering the sizes of the two tables. This patch added the logic to consider the sizes of the two tables for the build side. To make the logic clear, the build side is determined by two steps:
1. If there are broadcast hints, the build side is determined by `broadcastSideByHints`;
2. If there are no broadcast hints, the build side is determined by `broadcastSideBySizes`;
3. If the broadcast is disabled by the config, it falls back to the next cases.
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Feng Liu <fengliu@databricks.com>
Closes#20099 from liufengdb/fix-spark-strategies.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With #19474, children of insertion commands are missing in UI.
To fix it:
1. Create a new physical plan `DataWritingCommandExec` to exec `DataWritingCommand` with children. So that the other commands won't be affected.
2. On creation of `DataWritingCommand`, a new field `allColumns` must be specified, which is the output of analyzed plan.
3. In `FileFormatWriter`, the output schema will use `allColumns` instead of the output of optimized plan.
Before code changes:
After code changes:
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Wang Gengliang <ltnwgl@gmail.com>
Closes#20020 from gengliangwang/insert.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Escape of escape should be considered when using the UniVocity csv encoding/decoding library.
Ref: https://github.com/uniVocity/univocity-parsers#escaping-quote-escape-characters
One option is added for reading and writing CSV: `escapeQuoteEscaping`
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test added.
Author: soonmok-kwon <soonmok.kwon@navercorp.com>
Closes#20004 from ep1804/SPARK-22818.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Test Coverage for `DateTimeOperations`, this is a Sub-tasks for [SPARK-22722](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22722).
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Closes#20061 from wangyum/SPARK-22890.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR cleans up a few Java linter errors for Apache Spark 2.3 release.
## How was this patch tested?
```bash
$ dev/lint-java
Using `mvn` from path: /usr/local/bin/mvn
Checkstyle checks passed.
```
We can see the result from [Travis CI](https://travis-ci.org/dongjoon-hyun/spark/builds/322470787), too.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#20101 from dongjoon-hyun/fix-java-lint.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For empty/null column, the result of `ApproximatePercentile` is null. Then in `ApproxCountDistinctForIntervals`, a `MatchError` (for `endpoints`) will be thrown if we try to generate histogram for that column. Besides, there is no need to generate histogram for such column. In this patch, we exclude such column when generating histogram.
## How was this patch tested?
Enhanced test cases for empty/null columns.
Author: Zhenhua Wang <wangzhenhua@huawei.com>
Closes#20102 from wzhfy/no_record_hgm_bug.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses additional review comments in #19811
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test suites
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20036 from kiszk/SPARK-18066-followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Test coverage for arithmetic operations leading to:
1. Precision loss
2. Overflow
Moreover, tests for casting bad string to other input types and for using bad string as operators of some functions.
## How was this patch tested?
added tests
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#20084 from mgaido91/SPARK-22904.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`DateTimeOperations` accept [`StringType`](ae998ec2b5/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala (L669)), but:
```
spark-sql> SELECT '2017-12-24' + interval 2 months 2 seconds;
Error in query: cannot resolve '(CAST('2017-12-24' AS DOUBLE) + interval 2 months 2 seconds)' due to data type mismatch: differing types in '(CAST('2017-12-24' AS DOUBLE) + interval 2 months 2 seconds)' (double and calendarinterval).; line 1 pos 7;
'Project [unresolvedalias((cast(2017-12-24 as double) + interval 2 months 2 seconds), None)]
+- OneRowRelation
spark-sql>
```
After this PR:
```
spark-sql> SELECT '2017-12-24' + interval 2 months 2 seconds;
2018-02-24 00:00:02
Time taken: 0.2 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Closes#20067 from wangyum/SPARK-22894.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SPARK-20586 the flag `deterministic` was added to Scala UDF, but it is not available for python UDF. This flag is useful for cases when the UDF's code can return different result with the same input. Due to optimization, duplicate invocations may be eliminated or the function may even be invoked more times than it is present in the query. This can lead to unexpected behavior.
This PR adds the deterministic flag, via the `asNondeterministic` method, to let the user mark the function as non-deterministic and therefore avoid the optimizations which might lead to strange behaviors.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests:
```
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import *
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>> df_br = spark.createDataFrame([{'name': 'hello'}])
>>> import random
>>> udf_random_col = udf(lambda: int(100*random.random()), IntegerType()).asNondeterministic()
>>> df_br = df_br.withColumn('RAND', udf_random_col())
>>> random.seed(1234)
>>> udf_add_ten = udf(lambda rand: rand + 10, IntegerType())
>>> df_br.withColumn('RAND_PLUS_TEN', udf_add_ten('RAND')).show()
+-----+----+-------------+
| name|RAND|RAND_PLUS_TEN|
+-----+----+-------------+
|hello| 3| 13|
+-----+----+-------------+
```
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Author: Marco Gaido <mgaido@hortonworks.com>
Closes#19929 from mgaido91/SPARK-22629.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Decimal type is not yet supported in `ArrowWriter`.
This is adding the decimal type support.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `ArrowConvertersSuite`.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#18754 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-21552.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should use `dataType.simpleString` to unified the data type mismatch message:
Before:
```
spark-sql> select cast(1 as binary);
Error in query: cannot resolve 'CAST(1 AS BINARY)' due to data type mismatch: cannot cast IntegerType to BinaryType; line 1 pos 7;
```
After:
```
park-sql> select cast(1 as binary);
Error in query: cannot resolve 'CAST(1 AS BINARY)' due to data type mismatch: cannot cast int to binary; line 1 pos 7;
```
## How was this patch tested?
Exist test.
Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Closes#20064 from wangyum/SPARK-22893.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Basic continuous execution, supporting map/flatMap/filter, with commits and advancement through RPC.
## How was this patch tested?
new unit-ish tests (exercising execution end to end)
Author: Jose Torres <jose@databricks.com>
Closes#19984 from jose-torres/continuous-impl.
When one execution has multiple jobs, we need to append to the set of
stages, not replace them on every job.
Added unit test and ran existing tests on jenkins
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes#20047 from squito/SPARK-22861.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup PR of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19257 where gatorsmile had left couple comments wrt code style.
## How was this patch tested?
Doesn't change any functionality. Will depend on build to see if no checkstyle rules are violated.
Author: Tejas Patil <tejasp@fb.com>
Closes#20041 from tejasapatil/followup_19257.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Test Coverage for `WindowFrameCoercion` and `DecimalPrecision`, this is a Sub-tasks for [SPARK-22722](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22722).
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Closes#20008 from wangyum/SPARK-22822.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19681 we introduced a new interface called `AppStatusPlugin`, to register listeners and set up the UI for both live and history UI.
However I think it's an overkill for live UI. For example, we should not register `SQLListener` if users are not using SQL functions. Previously we register the `SQLListener` and set up SQL tab when `SparkSession` is firstly created, which indicates users are going to use SQL functions. But in #19681 , we register the SQL functions during `SparkContext` creation. The same thing should apply to streaming too.
I think we should keep the previous behavior, and only use this new interface for history server.
To reflect this change, I also rename the new interface to `SparkHistoryUIPlugin`
This PR also refines the tests for sql listener.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#19981 from cloud-fan/listener.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrade Spark to Arrow 0.8.0 for Java and Python. Also includes an upgrade of Netty to 4.1.17 to resolve dependency requirements.
The highlights that pertain to Spark for the update from Arrow versoin 0.4.1 to 0.8.0 include:
* Java refactoring for more simple API
* Java reduced heap usage and streamlined hot code paths
* Type support for DecimalType, ArrayType
* Improved type casting support in Python
* Simplified type checking in Python
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
Closes#19884 from BryanCutler/arrow-upgrade-080-SPARK-22324.
