### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adjust the `check_exact` parameter for non-numeric columns to ensure pandas-on-Spark tests passed with all pandas versions.
### Why are the changes needed?
`pd.testing` utils are utilized in pandas-on-Spark tests.
Due to https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/35446, `check_exact=True` for non-numeric columns doesn't work for older pd.testing utils, e.g. `assert_series_equal`. We wanted to adjust that to ensure pandas-on-Spark tests pass for all pandas versions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#32772 from xinrong-databricks/test_util.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes applying `black` to pandas API on Spark codes, for improving static analysis.
By executing the `./dev/reformat-python` in the spark home directory, all the code of the pandas API on Spark is fixed according to the static analysis rules.
### Why are the changes needed?
This can be reduces the cost of static analysis during development.
It has been used continuously for about a year in the Koalas project and its convenience has been proven.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, it's dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually reformat the pandas API on Spark codes by running the `./dev/reformat-python`, and checked the `./dev/lint-python` is passed.
Closes#32779 from itholic/SPARK-35499.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In functions.py, there is a function added `def column(col)`. There is also another method in the same file `def col(col)`. This leads to some ambiguity on whether the parameter is being referred to or the function. In pyspark 3.1.2, this leads to `TypeError: 'str' object is not callable` when the function `column(col)` is called - the highest preference is given to the string variable in scope as opposed to the function `col `in the file as intended.
This PR fixes that ambiguity by changing the variable name to `col_like`. I have filed this as an issue on JIRA here - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35643.
### Why are the changes needed?
In pyspark 3.1.2, we see `TypeError: 'str' object is not callable` when `column()` function is called. This Pr fixes that error.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
I don't believe this patch needs additional testing.
Closes#32771 from keerthanvasist/col.
Lead-authored-by: Keerthan Vasist <kvasist@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: keerthanvasist <kvasist@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to port Koalas documentation to PySpark documentation as its initial step.
It ports almost as is except these differences:
- Renamed import from `databricks.koalas` to `pyspark.pandas`.
- Renamed `to_koalas` -> `to_pandas_on_spark`
- Renamed `(Series|DataFrame).koalas` -> `(Series|DataFrame).pandas_on_spark`
- Added a `ps_` prefix in the RST file names of Koalas documentation
Other then that,
- Excluded `python/docs/build/html` in linter
- Fixed GA dependency installataion
### Why are the changes needed?
To document pandas APIs on Spark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it adds new documentations.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually built the docs and checked the output.
Closes#32726 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35587.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes adding the missing link to Data Source Option page, for related functions such as `to_csv`, `to_json`, `from_csv`, `from_json`, `schema_of_csv`, `schema_of_json`.
- Before
<img width="797" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-03 at 11 39 17 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44108233/120578877-7b092200-c461-11eb-9e24-bd5349445c66.png">
- After
<img width="776" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-03 at 11 59 14 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44108233/120579868-29fa2d80-c463-11eb-9329-bd6c8f068f5b.png">
### Why are the changes needed?
To provide users available options in detail with the proper documentation link.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the link to Data Source Options page is added to the API documentations, as shown in the above screen capture.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually built the docs and checked one by one.
Closes#32762 from itholic/SPARK-35081.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes restoring `to_koalas` to keep the backward compatibility, with throwing deprecated warning.
### Why are the changes needed?
If we remove `to_koalas`, the existing Koalas codes that include `to_koalas` wouldn't work.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. It's restoring the existing functionality.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested in local.
```shell
>>> sdf.to_koalas()
.../spark/python/pyspark/pandas/frame.py:4550: FutureWarning: DataFrame.to_koalas is deprecated as of DataFrame.to_pandas_on_spark. Please use the API instead.
warnings.warn(
```
Closes#32729 from itholic/SPARK-35539.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support arithmetic operations against bool IndexOpsMixin.
### Why are the changes needed?
Existing binary operations of bool IndexOpsMixin in Koalas do not match pandas’ behaviors.
pandas take True as 1, False as 0 when dealing with numeric values, numeric collections, and numeric Series/Index; whereas Koalas raises an AnalysisException no matter what the binary operation is.
We aim to match pandas' behaviors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([True, True, False])
>>> psser + 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Addition can not be applied to booleans.
>>> 1 + psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Addition can not be applied to booleans.
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> psser + ps.Series([1, 2, 3])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Addition can not be applied to booleans.
>>> ps.Series([1, 2, 3]) + psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: addition can not be applied to given types.
```
After the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([True, True, False])
>>> psser + 1
0 2
1 2
2 1
dtype: int64
>>> 1 + psser
0 2
1 2
2 1
dtype: int64
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> psser + ps.Series([1, 2, 3])
0 2
1 3
2 3
dtype: int64
>>> ps.Series([1, 2, 3]) + psser
0 2
1 3
2 3
dtype: int64
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32611 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_arith_bool.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to move `# noqa` in the Python docstring to the proper place so that hide them from the official documents.
### Why are the changes needed?
If we don't move `# noqa` to the proper place, it is exposed in the middle of the docstring, and it looks a bit wired as below:
<img width="613" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-01 at 3 17 52 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44108233/120275617-91da3800-c2ec-11eb-9778-16c5fe789418.png">
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the `# noqa` is no more shown in the documents as below:
<img width="609" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-01 at 3 21 00 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44108233/120275927-fbf2dd00-c2ec-11eb-950d-346af2745711.png">
### How was this patch tested?
Manually build docs and check.
Closes#32728 from itholic/SPARK-35582.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes renaming the existing "Koalas Accessor" to "Pandas API on Spark Accessor".
### Why are the changes needed?
Because we don't use name "Koalas" anymore, rather use "Pandas API on Spark".
So, the related code bases are all need to be changed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the usage of pandas API on Spark accessor is changed from `df.koalas.[...]`. to `df.pandas_on_spark.[...]`.
**Note:** `df.koalas.[...]` is still available but with deprecated warnings.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested in local and checked one by one.
Closes#32674 from itholic/SPARK-35453.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix and reenable `test_stats_on_non_numeric_columns_should_be_discarded_if_numeric_only_is_true` that was disabled when we upgrade Python 3.9 in CI at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32657.
Seems like this is because of the latest NumPy's behaviour change, see also `https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/16273#discussion_r641264085`.
pandas inherits this behaviour but it doesn't make sense when `numeric_only` is set to `True` in pandas. I will track and follow the status of the issue between pandas and NumPy.
For the time being, I propose to exclude boolean case alone in percentile/quartile test case
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep the test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
I roughly locally tested. But it should pass in CI.
Closes#32690 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35510.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Re-enable some pandas-on-Spark test cases.
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas version in GitHub Actions is upgraded now so we can re-enable some pandas-on-Spark test cases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32682 from xinrong-databricks/enable_tests.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Introduce a util function `spark_column_equals` to check the underlying expressions of columns are the same or not.
### Why are the changes needed?
In pandas on Spark, there are some places checking the underlying expressions of columns are the same or not, but it's done one-by-one.
We should introduce a util function for it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
The existing tests.
Closes#32680 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35537/spark_column_equals.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
BinaryType, which represents byte sequence values in Spark, doesn't support data-type-based operations yet. We are going to introduce BinaryOps for it.
### Why are the changes needed?
The data-type-based-operations class should be set for each individual data type, including BinaryType.
In addition, BinaryType has its special way of addition, which means concatenation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([b'1', b'2', b'3'])
>>> psser + psser
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
>>> psser + b'1'
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
```
After the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> psser = ps.Series([b'1', b'2', b'3'])
>>> psser + psser
0 [49, 49]
1 [50, 50]
2 [51, 51]
dtype: object
>>> psser + b'1'
0 [49, 49]
1 [50, 49]
2 [51, 49]
dtype: object
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32665 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeops_binary.
Lead-authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: xinrong-databricks <47337188+xinrong-databricks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed to introduce ArrayOps, MapOps and StructOps to handle data-type-based operations for StructType, ArrayType, and MapType separately.
### Why are the changes needed?
StructType, ArrayType, and MapType are not accepted by DataTypeOps now.
We should handle these complex types. Among them:
- ArrayType supports concatenation: for example, ps.Series([[1,2,3]]) + ps.Series([[4,5,6]]) should work the same as pd.Series([[1,2,3]]) + pd.Series([[4,5,6]]), as concatenation.
- StructOps will be helpful to make to/from pandas conversion data-type-based.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[0.4, 0.5]])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[4, 5]])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([['x']])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Type object was not understood.
```
After the change:
```py
>>> import pyspark.pandas as ps
>>> from pyspark.pandas.config import set_option
>>> set_option("compute.ops_on_diff_frames", True)
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[0.4, 0.5]])
0 [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 0.4, 0.5]
dtype: object
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([[4, 5]])
0 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
dtype: object
>>> ps.Series([[1, 2, 3]]) + ps.Series([['x']])
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: Concatenation can only be applied to arrays of the same type
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
Closes#32626 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_complex.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use a proper built-in exceptions instead of the plain `Exception` in Python.
While I am here, I fixed another minor issue at `DataFrams.schema` together:
```diff
- except AttributeError as e:
- raise Exception(
- "Unable to parse datatype from schema. %s" % e)
+ except Exception as e:
+ raise ValueError(
+ "Unable to parse datatype from schema. %s" % e) from e
```
Now it catches all exceptions during schema parsing, chains the exception with `ValueError`. Previously it only caught `AttributeError` that does not catch all cases.
### Why are the changes needed?
For users to expect the proper exceptions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yeah, the exception classes became different but should be compatible because previous exception was plain `Exception` which other exceptions inherit.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unittests should cover,
Closes#31238Closes#32650 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-32194.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables GitHub Actions to test PySpark with Python 3.9.
### Why are the changes needed?
To verify the support of Python 3.9.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover.
Closes#32657 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35506.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes APIs which have been deprecated in Koalas.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are some APIs that have been deprecated in Koalas. We shouldn't have those in pandas APIs on Spark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the APIs deprecated in Koalas will be no longer available.
### How was this patch tested?
Modified some tests which use the deprecated APIs, and the other existing tests should pass.
Closes#32656 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35505/remove_deprecated.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables plot tests with plotly
```bash
./python/run-tests --python-executables=python3 --modules=pyspark-pandas
```
**Before**:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/.../miniconda3/envs/python3.8/lib/python3.8/runpy.py", line 194, in _run_module_as_main
return _run_code(code, main_globals, None,
File "/.../miniconda3/envs/python3.8/lib/python3.8/runpy.py", line 87, in _run_code
exec(code, run_globals)
File "/.../pyspark/pandas/tests/plot/test_frame_plot_plotly.py", line 42, in <module>
plotly_requirement_message + " Or pandas<1.0; pandas<1.0 does not support latest plotly "
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'str'
```
**After**:
```
...
Starting test(python3): pyspark.pandas.tests.plot.test_series_plot_plotly
...
Finished test(python3): pyspark.pandas.tests.plot.test_series_plot_plotly (23s)
...
Tests passed in 1296 seconds
```
### Why are the changes needed?
For test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the tests.
Closes#32649 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35497.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add thread target wrapper API for pyspark pin thread mode.
### Why are the changes needed?
A helper method which make user easier to write threading code under pin thread mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Closes#32644 from WeichenXu123/add_thread_target_wrapper_api.
Authored-by: Weichen Xu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds more type annotations in the files:
- `python/pyspark/pandas/spark/accessors.py`
- `python/pyspark/pandas/typedef/typehints.py`
- `python/pyspark/pandas/utils.py`
and fixes the mypy check failures.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should enable more `disallow_untyped_defs` mypy checks.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
This PR adds more type annotations in pandas APIs on Spark module, which can impact interaction with development tools for users.
### How was this patch tested?
The mypy check with a new configuration and existing tests should pass.
Closes#32627 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35467_35468_35477/disallow_untyped_defs.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Sets up the `mypy` configuration to enable `disallow_untyped_defs` check for pandas APIs on Spark module.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently many functions in the main codes in pandas APIs on Spark module are still missing type annotations and disabled `mypy` check `disallow_untyped_defs`.
We should add more type annotations and enable the mypy check.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
This PR adds more type annotations in pandas APIs on Spark module, which can impact interaction with development tools for users.
### How was this patch tested?
The mypy check with a new configuration and existing tests should pass.
Closes#32614 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35465/disallow_untyped_defs.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are still naming related to Koalas in test and function name. This PR addressed them to fit pandas-on-spark.
- kdf -> psdf
- kser -> psser
- kidx -> psidx
- kmidx -> psmidx
- to_koalas() -> to_pandas_on_spark()
### Why are the changes needed?
This is because the name Koalas is no longer used in PySpark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`to_koalas()` function is renamed to `to_pandas_on_spark()`
### How was this patch tested?
Tested in local manually.
After changing the related naming, I checked them one by one.
Closes#32516 from itholic/SPARK-35364.
Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed for **pandas APIs on Spark**, in order to separate arithmetic operations shown as below into data-type-based structures.
`__add__, __sub__, __mul__, __truediv__, __floordiv__, __pow__, __mod__,
__radd__, __rsub__, __rmul__, __rtruediv__, __rfloordiv__, __rpow__,__rmod__`
DataTypeOps and subclasses are introduced.
The existing behaviors of each arithmetic operation should be preserved.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the same arithmetic operation of all data types is defined in one function, so it’s difficult to extend the behavior change based on the data types.
Introducing DataTypeOps would be the foundation for [pandas APIs on Spark: Separate basic operations into data type based structures.](https://docs.google.com/document/d/12MS6xK0hETYmrcl5b9pX5lgV4FmGVfpmcSKq--_oQlc/edit?usp=sharing).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Tests are introduced under pyspark.pandas.tests.data_type_ops. One test file per DataTypeOps class.
Closes#32596 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_arith_fix.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoids using f-string format that's a new feature in Python 3.6. Although it's legitimate to use this syntax because Apache Spark supports Python 3.6+, this breaks unofficial support of Python 3.5.
This specific f-string format looks something unnecessary, and doesn't look worth enough to remove such unofficial support because of one string format in an error message.
**NOTE** that this PR doesn't mean that we're maintaining Python 3.5 since we dropped. It just looks like too much to remove that unofficial support only because of one string format and error message.
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep unofficial Python 3.5 support
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Officially nope.
### How was this patch tested?
Ran the linters.
Closes#32598 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35408=followup.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is proposed for **pandas APIs on Spark**, in order to separate arithmetic operations shown as below into data-type-based structures.
`__add__, __sub__, __mul__, __truediv__, __floordiv__, __pow__, __mod__,
__radd__, __rsub__, __rmul__, __rtruediv__, __rfloordiv__, __rpow__,__rmod__`
DataTypeOps and subclasses are introduced.
The existing behaviors of each arithmetic operation should be preserved.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the same arithmetic operation of all data types is defined in one function, so it’s difficult to extend the behavior change based on the data types.
Introducing DataTypeOps would be the foundation for [pandas APIs on Spark: Separate basic operations into data type based structures.](https://docs.google.com/document/d/12MS6xK0hETYmrcl5b9pX5lgV4FmGVfpmcSKq--_oQlc/edit?usp=sharing).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Tests are introduced under pyspark.pandas.tests.data_type_ops. One test file per DataTypeOps class.
Closes#32469 from xinrong-databricks/datatypeop_arith.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `sentences`, a string function, which is present as of `2.0.0` but missing in `functions.{scala,py}`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This function can be only used from SQL for now.
It's good if we can use this function from Scala/Python code as well as SQL.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Users can use this function from Scala and Python.
### How was this patch tested?
New test.
Closes#32566 from sarutak/sentences-function.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30309 added a configuration (disabled by default) that simplifies the error messages from Python UDFS, which removed internal stacktrace from Python workers:
```python
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf; spark.range(10).select(udf(lambda x: x/0)("id")).collect()
```
**Before**
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 427, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20, vertical))
File "/.../python/lib/py4j-0.10.9-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1305, in __call__
File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 127, in deco
raise_from(converted)
File "<string>", line 3, in raise_from
pyspark.sql.utils.PythonException:
An exception was thrown from Python worker in the executor:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 605, in main
process()
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 597, in process
serializer.dump_stream(out_iter, outfile)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/serializers.py", line 223, in dump_stream
self.serializer.dump_stream(self._batched(iterator), stream)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/serializers.py", line 141, in dump_stream
for obj in iterator:
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/serializers.py", line 212, in _batched
for item in iterator:
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 450, in mapper
result = tuple(f(*[a[o] for o in arg_offsets]) for (arg_offsets, f) in udfs)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 450, in <genexpr>
result = tuple(f(*[a[o] for o in arg_offsets]) for (arg_offsets, f) in udfs)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/worker.py", line 90, in <lambda>
return lambda *a: f(*a)
File "/.../python/lib/pyspark.zip/pyspark/util.py", line 107, in wrapper
return f(*args, **kwargs)
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <lambda>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero
```
**After**
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 427, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, 20, vertical))
File "/.../python/lib/py4j-0.10.9-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1305, in __call__
File "/.../python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 127, in deco
raise_from(converted)
File "<string>", line 3, in raise_from
pyspark.sql.utils.PythonException:
An exception was thrown from Python worker in the executor:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <lambda>
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero
```
Note that the traceback (`return f(*args, **kwargs)`) is almost always same - I would say more than 99%. For 1% case, we can guide developers to enable this configuration for further debugging.
In Databricks, it has been enabled for around 6 months, and I have had zero negative feedback on it.
### Why are the changes needed?
To show simplified exception messages to end users.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it will hide the internal Python worker traceback.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases should cover.
Closes#32569 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35419.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes `mypy` errors and enables `mypy` check for pandas-on-Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
The `mypy` check for pandas-on-Spark was disabled when the initial porting.
It should be enabled again; otherwise we will miss type checking errors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
The enabled `mypy` check and existing unit tests should pass.
Closes#32540 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-34941/pandas_mypy.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Provide clearer error message tied to the user's Python code if incorrect parameters are passed to `DataFrame.show` rather than the message about a missing JVM method the user is not calling directly.
```
py4j.Py4JException: Method showString([class java.lang.Boolean, class java.lang.Integer, class java.lang.Boolean]) does not exist
at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.getMethod(ReflectionEngine.java:318)
at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.getMethod(ReflectionEngine.java:326)
at py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:274)
at py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:132)
at py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
at py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:238)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748
```
### Why are the changes needed?
For faster debugging through actionable error message.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No change for the correct parameters but different error messages for the parameters triggering an exception.
### How was this patch tested?
- unit test
- manually in PySpark REPL
Closes#32555 from gerashegalov/df_show_validation.
Authored-by: Gera Shegalov <gera@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add required imports to Pyspark ML examples in CrossValidator, TrainValidationSplit
### Why are the changes needed?
The examples pass doctests because of previous imports, but as they appear in Pyspark documentation, are incomplete. The additional imports are required to make the example work.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, docs only change.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32554 from srowen/TuningImports.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes the check of `summary.logLikelihood` in ml/clustering.py - this GMM test is quite flaky. It fails easily e.g., if:
- change number of partitions;
- just change the way to compute the sum of weights;
- change the underlying BLAS impl
Also uses more permissive precision on `Word2Vec` test case.
### Why are the changes needed?
To recover the build and tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases.
Closes#32533 from zhengruifeng/SPARK_35392_disable_flaky_gmm_test.
Lead-authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the same issue as #32424.
```py
from pyspark.sql.functions import flatten, struct, transform
df = spark.sql("SELECT array(1, 2, 3) as numbers, array('a', 'b', 'c') as letters")
df.select(flatten(
transform(
"numbers",
lambda number: transform(
"letters",
lambda letter: struct(number.alias("n"), letter.alias("l"))
)
)
).alias("zipped")).show(truncate=False)
```
**Before:**
```
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|zipped |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|[{a, a}, {b, b}, {c, c}, {a, a}, {b, b}, {c, c}, {a, a}, {b, b}, {c, c}]|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
**After:**
```
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|zipped |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|[{1, a}, {1, b}, {1, c}, {2, a}, {2, b}, {2, c}, {3, a}, {3, b}, {3, c}]|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To produce the correct results.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it fixes the results to be correct as mentioned above.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test as well as manually.
Closes#32523 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-35382/nested_higher_order_functions.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use full names of modules in `install.rst` when specifying dependencies.
### Why are the changes needed?
Using full names makes it more clear.
In addition, `pandas APIs on Spark` as a new module can start to be recognized by more people.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manual verification.
Closes#32427 from xinrong-databricks/nameDoc.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Port Koalas dependencies appropriately to PySpark dependencies.
### Why are the changes needed?
pandas-on-Spark has its own required dependency and optional dependencies.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manual test.
Closes#32386 from xinrong-databricks/portDeps.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The parameter **no_implicit_optional** is defined twice in the mypy configuration, [ligne 20](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/mypy.ini#L20) and ligne 105.
### Why are the changes needed?
We would like to keep the mypy configuration clean.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
This patch can be tested with `dev/lint-python`
Closes#32418 from garawalid/feature/clean-mypy-config.
Authored-by: garawalid <gwalid94@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is rather a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30518 that should be ported back to `branch-3.1` too.
`STOP_AT_DELIMITER` was mistakenly used twice. The duplicated `STOP_AT_DELIMITER` should be `SKIP_VALUE` in the documentation.
### Why are the changes needed?
To correctly document.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it fixes the user-facing documentation.
### How was this patch tested?
I checked them via running linters.
Closes#32423 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-35250.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR corrects some exception type when the function input params are failed to validate due to TypeError.
In order to convenient to review, there are 3 commits in this PR:
- Standardize input validation error type on sql
- Standardize input validation error type on ml
- Standardize input validation error type on pandas
### Why are the changes needed?
As suggestion from Python exception doc [1]: "Raised when an operation or function is applied to an object of inappropriate type.", but there are many Value error are raised in some pyspark code, this patch fix them.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html#TypeError
Note that: this patch only addresses the exsiting some wrong raise type for input validation, the input validation decorator/framework which mentioned in [SPARK-35176](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35176), would be submited in a speparated patch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, code can raise the right TypeError instead of ValueError.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing test case and UT
Closes#32368 from Yikun/SPARK-35176.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds a note for aarch64 user to install the specific pyarrow>=4.0.0.
### Why are the changes needed?
The pyarrow aarch64 support is [introduced](https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9285) in [PyArrow 4.0.0](https://github.com/apache/arrow/releases/tag/apache-arrow-4.0.0), and it has been published 27.Apr.2021.
See more in [SPARK-34979](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34979).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, this doc can help user install arrow on aarch64.
### How was this patch tested?
doc test passed.
Closes#32363 from Yikun/SPARK-34979.
Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
There are two types of dense vectors:
* pyspark.ml.linalg.DenseVector
* pyspark.mllib.linalg.DenseVector
In spark-3.1.1, array_to_vector returns instances of pyspark.ml.linalg.DenseVector.
The documentation is ambiguous & can lead to the false conclusion that instances of
pyspark.mllib.linalg.DenseVector will be returned.
Conversion from ml versions to mllib versions can easly be achieved with
mlutils.convertVectorColumnsToML helper.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make documentation more explicit
### Why are the changes needed?
The documentation is a bit misleading and users can lose time investigating & realizing there are two DenseVector types.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No test were run as only the documentation was changed
Closes#32255 from jlafaye/master.
Authored-by: Julien Lafaye <jlafaye@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, remove existing agg, and use a new agg supporting virtual centering
2, add related testsuites
### Why are the changes needed?
centering vectors should accelerate convergence, and generate solution more close to R
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
updated testsuites and added testsuites
Closes#32124 from zhengruifeng/svc_agg_refactor.
Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes PySpark version dependent codes from pyspark.pandas test codes.
### Why are the changes needed?
There are several places to check the PySpark version and switch the logic, but now those are not necessary.
We should remove them.
We will do the same thing after we finish porting tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#32300 from xinrong-databricks/port.rmv_spark_version_chk_in_tests.
Authored-by: Xinrong Meng <xinrong.meng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Xinrong Meng
itholic
Keerthan Vasist
Hyukjin Kwon
Takuya UESHIN
Weichen Xu
Kousuke Saruta
Gera Shegalov
Sean Owen
Ruifeng Zheng
garawalid
Yikun Jiang
Ludovic Henry
Julien Lafaye
