## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The optimizer rule `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin` performs join reordering on inner joins. This was introduced from SPARK-12032 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10073) in 2015-12.
After it had reordered the joins, though, it didn't check whether or not the output attribute order is still the same as before. Thus, it's possible to have a mismatch between the reordered output attributes order vs the schema that a DataFrame thinks it has.
The same problem exists in the CBO version of join reordering (`CostBasedJoinReorder`) too.
This can be demonstrated with the example:
```scala
spark.sql("create table table_a (x int, y int) using parquet")
spark.sql("create table table_b (i int, j int) using parquet")
spark.sql("create table table_c (a int, b int) using parquet")
val df = spark.sql("""
with df1 as (select * from table_a cross join table_b)
select * from df1 join table_c on a = x and b = i
""")
```
here's what the DataFrame thinks:
```
scala> df.printSchema
root
|-- x: integer (nullable = true)
|-- y: integer (nullable = true)
|-- i: integer (nullable = true)
|-- j: integer (nullable = true)
|-- a: integer (nullable = true)
|-- b: integer (nullable = true)
```
here's what the optimized plan thinks, after join reordering:
```
scala> df.queryExecution.optimizedPlan.output.foreach(a => println(s"|-- ${a.name}: ${a.dataType.typeName}"))
|-- x: integer
|-- y: integer
|-- a: integer
|-- b: integer
|-- i: integer
|-- j: integer
```
If we exclude the `ReorderJoin` rule (using Spark 2.4's optimizer rule exclusion feature), it's back to normal:
```
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.optimizer.excludedRules", "org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ReorderJoin")
scala> val df = spark.sql("with df1 as (select * from table_a cross join table_b) select * from df1 join table_c on a = x and b = i")
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [x: int, y: int ... 4 more fields]
scala> df.queryExecution.optimizedPlan.output.foreach(a => println(s"|-- ${a.name}: ${a.dataType.typeName}"))
|-- x: integer
|-- y: integer
|-- i: integer
|-- j: integer
|-- a: integer
|-- b: integer
```
Note that this output attribute ordering problem leads to data corruption, and can manifest itself in various symptoms:
* Silently corrupting data, if the reordered columns happen to either have matching types or have sufficiently-compatible types (e.g. all fixed length primitive types are considered as "sufficiently compatible" in an `UnsafeRow`), then only the resulting data is going to be wrong but it might not trigger any alarms immediately. Or
* Weird Java-level exceptions like `java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException`, or even SIGSEGVs.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit test in `JoinReorderSuite` and new end-to-end test in `JoinSuite`.
Also made `JoinReorderSuite` and `StarJoinReorderSuite` assert more strongly on maintaining output attribute order.
Closes#23303 from rednaxelafx/fix-join-reorder.
Authored-by: Kris Mok <rednaxelafx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `CSVInferSchema` class is extended to support inferring of `DateType` from CSV input. The attempt to infer `DateType` is performed after inferring `TimestampType`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test for inferring date types from CSV . It was also tested by existing suites like `CSVInferSchemaSuite`, `CsvExpressionsSuite`, `CsvFunctionsSuite` and `CsvSuite`.
Closes#23202 from MaxGekk/csv-date-inferring.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to switch on **java.time API** for parsing timestamps and dates from JSON inputs with microseconds precision. The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` allow to switch back to previous behavior with using `java.text.SimpleDateFormat`/`FastDateFormat` for parsing/generating timestamps/dates.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by `JsonExpressionsSuite`, `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonSuite`.
Closes#23196 from MaxGekk/json-time-parser.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When using a higher-order function with the same variable name as the existing columns in `Filter` or something which uses `Analyzer.resolveExpressionBottomUp` during the resolution, e.g.,:
```scala
val df = Seq(
(Seq(1, 9, 8, 7), 1, 2),
(Seq(5, 9, 7), 2, 2),
(Seq.empty, 3, 2),
(null, 4, 2)
).toDF("i", "x", "d")
checkAnswer(df.filter("exists(i, x -> x % d == 0)"),
Seq(Row(Seq(1, 9, 8, 7), 1, 2)))
checkAnswer(df.select("x").filter("exists(i, x -> x % d == 0)"),
Seq(Row(1)))
```
the following exception happens:
```
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BoundReference cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.NamedExpression
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:62)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach$(ResizableArray.scala:55)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:49)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:230)
at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:108)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.HigherOrderFunction.$anonfun$functionsForEval$1(higherOrderFunctions.scala:147)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:237)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:230)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.HigherOrderFunction.functionsForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:145)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.HigherOrderFunction.functionsForEval$(higherOrderFunctions.scala:145)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.functionsForEval$lzycompute(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.functionsForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.functionForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:176)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.functionForEval$(higherOrderFunctions.scala:176)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.functionForEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.nullSafeEval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.eval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SimpleHigherOrderFunction.eval$(higherOrderFunctions.scala:185)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ArrayExists.eval(higherOrderFunctions.scala:369)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$SpecificPredicate.eval(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FilterExec.$anonfun$doExecute$3(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:216)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FilterExec.$anonfun$doExecute$3$adapted(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:215)
...
```
because the `UnresolvedAttribute`s in `LambdaFunction` are unexpectedly resolved by the rule.
This pr modified to use a placeholder `UnresolvedNamedLambdaVariable` to prevent unexpected resolution.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test and modified some tests.
Closes#23320 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-26370/hof_resolution.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
cleanup some tests to make sure expression is resolved during test.
## How was this patch tested?
test-only PR
Closes#23297 from cloud-fan/test.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
… incorrect.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the reported heartbeat information, the unit of the memory data is bytes, which is converted by the formatBytes() function in the utils.js file before being displayed in the interface. The cardinality of the unit conversion in the formatBytes function is 1000, which should be 1024.
Change the cardinality of the unit conversion in the formatBytes function to 1024.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#22683 from httfighter/SPARK-25696.
Lead-authored-by: 韩田田00222924 <han.tiantian@zte.com.cn>
Co-authored-by: han.tiantian@zte.com.cn <han.tiantian@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
There are 4 places we need to deal with NaN and -0.0:
1. comparison expressions. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
2. Join keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
3. grouping keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be assigned to the same group. Different NaNs should be assigned to the same group.
4. window partition keys. `-0.0` and `0.0` should be treated as same. Different NaNs should be treated as same.
The case 1 is OK. Our comparison already handles NaN and -0.0, and for struct/array/map, we will recursively compare the fields/elements.
Case 2, 3 and 4 are problematic, as they compare `UnsafeRow` binary directly, and different NaNs have different binary representation, and the same thing happens for -0.0 and 0.0.
To fix it, a simple solution is: normalize float/double when building unsafe data (`UnsafeRow`, `UnsafeArrayData`, `UnsafeMapData`). Then we don't need to worry about it anymore.
Following this direction, this PR moves the handling of NaN and -0.0 from `Platform` to `UnsafeWriter`, so that places like `UnsafeRow.setFloat` will not handle them, which reduces the perf overhead. It's also easier to add comments explaining why we do it in `UnsafeWriter`.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23239 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to use **java.time API** for parsing timestamps and dates from CSV content with microseconds precision. The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` allow to switch back to previous behaviour with using `java.text.SimpleDateFormat`/`FastDateFormat` for parsing/generating timestamps/dates.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by `UnivocityParserSuite`, `CsvExpressionsSuite`, `CsvFunctionsSuite` and `CsvSuite`.
Closes#23150 from MaxGekk/time-parser.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SPARK-23711, we have implemented the expression fallback logic to an interpreted mode. So, this pr fixed code to support the same fallback mode in `SafeProjection` based on `CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallback`.
## How was this patch tested?
Add tests in `CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallbackSuite` and `UnsafeRowConverterSuite`.
Closes#22468 from maropu/SPARK-25374-3.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since `AggregationIterator` uses `MutableProjection` for `UnsafeRow`, `InterpretedMutableProjection` needs to handle `UnsafeRow` as buffer internally for fixed-length types only.
## How was this patch tested?
Run 'SQLQueryTestSuite' with the interpreted mode.
Closes#22512 from maropu/InterpreterTest.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For now the `hasMinMaxStats` will return the same as `hasCountStats`, which is obviously not as expected.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23152 from adrian-wang/minmaxstats.
Authored-by: Daoyuan Wang <me@daoyuan.wang>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
How to reproduce this issue:
```scala
scala> val meta = new org.apache.spark.sql.types.MetadataBuilder().putNull("key").build().json
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.Metadata$.org$apache$spark$sql$types$Metadata$$toJsonValue(Metadata.scala:196)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.Metadata$$anonfun$1.apply(Metadata.scala:180)
```
This pr fix `NullPointerException` when `Metadata` serialize `null` values.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Closes#23164 from wangyum/SPARK-26198.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow pr of #23176.
`In` and `InSet` are semantically equal, so the tests for `In` should pass with `InSet`, and vice versa.
This combines those test cases.
## How was this patch tested?
The combined tests and existing tests.
Closes#23187 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-26211/in_inset_tests.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch changes the query plan tracker added earlier to report phase timeline, rather than just a duration for each phase. This way, we can easily find time that's unaccounted for.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated test cases to reflect that.
Closes#23183 from rxin/SPARK-26226.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose using of the locale option to parse decimals from CSV input. After the changes, `UnivocityParser` converts input string to `BigDecimal` and to Spark's Decimal by using `java.text.DecimalFormat`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test for the `en-US`, `ko-KR`, `ru-RU`, `de-DE` locales.
Closes#22979 from MaxGekk/decimal-parsing-locale.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently `InSet` doesn't work properly for binary type, or struct and array type with null value in the set.
Because, as for binary type, the `HashSet` doesn't work properly for `Array[Byte]`, and as for struct and array type with null value in the set, the `ordering` will throw a `NPE`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a few tests.
Closes#23176 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-26211/inset.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose using of the locale option to parse (and infer) decimals from JSON input. After the changes, `JacksonParser` converts input string to `BigDecimal` and to Spark's Decimal by using `java.text.DecimalFormat`. New behaviour can be switched off via SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.decimalParsing.enabled`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added 2 tests to `JsonExpressionsSuite` for the `en-US`, `ko-KR`, `ru-RU`, `de-DE` locales:
- Inferring decimal type using locale from JSON field values
- Converting JSON field values to specified decimal type using the locales.
Closes#23132 from MaxGekk/json-decimal-parsing-locale.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently duplicated map keys are not handled consistently. For example, map look up respects the duplicated key appears first, `Dataset.collect` only keeps the duplicated key appears last, `MapKeys` returns duplicated keys, etc.
This PR proposes to remove duplicated map keys with last wins policy, to follow Java/Scala and Presto. It only applies to built-in functions, as users can create map with duplicated map keys via private APIs anyway.
updated functions: `CreateMap`, `MapFromArrays`, `MapFromEntries`, `StringToMap`, `MapConcat`, `TransformKeys`.
For other places:
1. data source v1 doesn't have this problem, as users need to provide a java/scala map, which can't have duplicated keys.
2. data source v2 may have this problem. I've added a note to `ArrayBasedMapData` to ask the caller to take care of duplicated keys. In the future we should enforce it in the stable data APIs for data source v2.
3. UDF doesn't have this problem, as users need to provide a java/scala map. Same as data source v1.
4. file format. I checked all of them and only parquet does not enforce it. For backward compatibility reasons I change nothing but leave a note saying that the behavior will be undefined if users write map with duplicated keys to parquet files. Maybe we can add a config and fail by default if parquet files have map with duplicated keys. This can be done in followup.
## How was this patch tested?
updated tests and new tests
Closes#23124 from cloud-fan/map.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22326 made a mistake that, not all python UDFs are unevaluable in join condition. Only python UDFs that refer to attributes from both join side are unevaluable.
This PR fixes this mistake.
## How was this patch tested?
a new test
Closes#23153 from cloud-fan/join.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The purpose of this PR is supplement new test cases for a + 1,a + b and Rand in SetOperationSuite.
It comes from the comment of closed PR:#20541, thanks.
## How was this patch tested?
add new test cases
Closes#23138 from heary-cao/UnionPushTestCases.
Authored-by: caoxuewen <cao.xuewen@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Based on https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22857 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23079, this PR did a few updates
- Limit the data types of NULL to Boolean.
- Limit the input data type of replaceNullWithFalse to Boolean; throw an exception in the testing mode.
- Create a new file for the rule ReplaceNullWithFalseInPredicate
- Update the description of this rule.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test case
Closes#23139 from gatorsmile/followupSpark-25860.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Create a new suite DataFrameSetOperationsSuite for the test cases of DataFrame/Dataset's set operations.
Also, add test cases of NULL handling for Array Except and Array Intersect.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#23137 from gatorsmile/setOpsTest.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix Decimal `toScalaBigInt` and `toJavaBigInteger` used to only work for decimals not fitting long.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test to DecimalSuite.
Closes#23022 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-26038.
Authored-by: Juliusz Sompolski <julek@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is an addendum patch for SPARK-26129 that defines the edge case behavior for QueryPlanningTracker.topRulesByTime.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests for each behavior.
Closes#23110 from rxin/SPARK-26129-1.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The corrupt column specified via JSON/CSV option *columnNameOfCorruptRecord* must have the `string` type and be `nullable`. This has been already checked in `DataFrameReader`.`csv`/`json` and in `Json`/`CsvFileFormat` but not in `from_json`/`from_csv`. The PR adds such checks inside functions as well.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests to `Json`/`CsvExpressionSuite` for checking type of the corrupt column. They don't check the `nullable` property because `schema` is forcibly casted to nullable.
Closes#23070 from MaxGekk/verify-corrupt-column-csv-json.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
An input without valid JSON tokens on the root level will be treated as a bad record, and handled according to `mode`. Previously such input was converted to `null`. After the changes, the input is converted to a row with `null`s in the `PERMISSIVE` mode according the schema. This allows to remove a code in the `from_json` function which can produce `null` as result rows.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by existing test suites. Some of them I have to modify (`JsonSuite` for example) because previously bad input was just silently ignored. For now such input is handled according to specified `mode`.
Closes#22938 from MaxGekk/json-nulls.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose:
- new SQL config `spark.sql.debug.maxToStringFields` to control maximum number fields up to which `truncatedString` cuts its input sequences.
- Moving `truncatedString` out of `core` to `sql/catalyst` because it is used only in the `sql/catalyst` packages for restricting number of fields converted to strings from `TreeNode` and expressions of`StructType`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `QueryExecutionSuite` to check that `spark.sql.debug.maxToStringFields` impacts to behavior of `truncatedString`.
Closes#23039 from MaxGekk/truncated-string-catalyst.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently don't have good visibility into query planning time (analysis vs optimization vs physical planning). This patch adds a simple utility to track the runtime of various rules and various planning phases.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests and end-to-end integration tests.
Closes#23096 from rxin/SPARK-26129.
Authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change fixes a particular scenario where default spark SQL can't encode (thrift) types that are generated by twitter scrooge. These types are a trait that extends `scala.ProductX` with a constructor defined only in a companion object, rather than a actual case class. The actual case class used is child class, but that type is almost never referred to in code. The type has no corresponding constructor symbol and causes an exception. For all other purposes, these classes act just like case classes, so it is unfortunate that spark SQL can't serialize them nicely as it can actual case classes. For an full example of a scrooge codegen class, see https://gist.github.com/anonymous/ba13d4b612396ca72725eaa989900314.
This change catches the case where the type has no constructor but does have an `apply` method on the type's companion object. This allows for thrift types to be serialized/deserialized with implicit encoders the same way as normal case classes. This fix had to be done in three places where the constructor is assumed to be an actual constructor:
1) In serializing, determining the schema for the dataframe relies on inspecting its constructor (`ScalaReflection.constructParams`). Here we fall back to using the companion constructor arguments.
2) In deserializing or evaluating, in the java codegen ( `NewInstance.doGenCode`), the type couldn't be constructed with the new keyword. If there is no constructor, we change the constructor call to try the companion constructor.
3) In deserializing or evaluating, without codegen, the constructor is directly invoked (`NewInstance.constructor`). This was fixed with scala reflection to get the actual companion apply method.
The return type of `findConstructor` was changed because the companion apply method constructor can't be represented as a `java.lang.reflect.Constructor`.
There might be situations in which this approach would also fail in a new way, but it does at a minimum work for the specific scrooge example and will not impact cases that were already succeeding prior to this change
Note: this fix does not enable using scrooge thrift enums, additional work for this is necessary. With this patch, it seems like you could patch `com.twitter.scrooge.ThriftEnum` to extend `_root_.scala.Product1[Int]` with `def _1 = value` to get spark's implicit encoders to handle enums, but I've yet to use this method myself.
Note: I previously opened a PR for this issue, but only was able to fix case 1) there: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18766
## How was this patch tested?
I've fixed all 3 cases and added two tests that use a case class that is similar to scrooge generated one. The test in ScalaReflectionSuite checks 1), and the additional asserting in ObjectExpressionsSuite checks 2) and 3).
Closes#23062 from drewrobb/SPARK-8288.
Authored-by: Drew Robb <drewrobb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes an exception in `AggregateExpression.references` called on unresolved expressions. It implements the solution proposed in [SPARK-26084](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26084), a minor refactoring that removes the unnecessary dependence on `AttributeSet.toSeq`, which requires expression IDs and, therefore, can only execute successfully for resolved expressions.
The refactored implementation is both simpler and faster, eliminating the conversion of a `Set` to a
`Seq` and back to `Set`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test based on the failing case in [SPARK-26084](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26084).
hvanhovell
Closes#23075 from ssimeonov/ss_SPARK-26084.
Authored-by: Simeon Simeonov <sim@fastignite.com>
Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Extend the `ReplaceNullWithFalse` optimizer rule introduced in SPARK-25860 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22857) to also support optimizing predicates in higher-order functions of `ArrayExists`, `ArrayFilter`, `MapFilter`.
Also rename the rule to `ReplaceNullWithFalseInPredicate` to better reflect its intent.
Example:
```sql
select filter(a, e -> if(e is null, null, true)) as b from (
select array(null, 1, null, 3) as a)
```
The optimized logical plan:
**Before**:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [filter([null,1,null,3], lambdafunction(if (isnull(lambda e#13)) null else true, lambda e#13, false)) AS b#9]
+- OneRowRelation
```
**After**:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [filter([null,1,null,3], lambdafunction(if (isnull(lambda e#13)) false else true, lambda e#13, false)) AS b#9]
+- OneRowRelation
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit test cases to the `ReplaceNullWithFalseInPredicateSuite` (renamed from `ReplaceNullWithFalseSuite`).
Closes#23079 from rednaxelafx/catalyst-master.
Authored-by: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The build has a lot of deprecation warnings. Some are new in Scala 2.12 and Java 11. We've fixed some, but I wanted to take a pass at fixing lots of easy miscellaneous ones here.
They're too numerous and small to list here; see the pull request. Some highlights:
- `BeanInfo` is deprecated in 2.12, and BeanInfo classes are pretty ancient in Java. Instead, case classes can explicitly declare getters
- Eta expansion of zero-arg methods; foo() becomes () => foo() in many cases
- Floating-point Range is inexact and deprecated, like 0.0 to 100.0 by 1.0
- finalize() is finally deprecated (just needs to be suppressed)
- StageInfo.attempId was deprecated and easiest to remove here
I'm not now going to touch some chunks of deprecation warnings:
- Parquet deprecations
- Hive deprecations (particularly serde2 classes)
- Deprecations in generated code (mostly Thriftserver CLI)
- ProcessingTime deprecations (we may need to revive this class as internal)
- many MLlib deprecations because they concern methods that may be removed anyway
- a few Kinesis deprecations I couldn't figure out
- Mesos get/setRole, which I don't know well
- Kafka/ZK deprecations (e.g. poll())
- Kinesis
- a few other ones that will probably resolve by deleting a deprecated method
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests, including manual testing with the 2.11 build and Java 11.
Closes#23065 from srowen/SPARK-26090.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Due to implementation limitation, currently Spark can't compare or do equality check between map types. As a result, map values can't appear in EQUAL or comparison expressions, can't be grouping key, etc.
The more important thing is, map loop up needs to do equality check of the map key, and thus can't support map as map key when looking up values from a map. Thus it's not useful to have map as map key.
This PR proposes to stop users from creating maps using map type as key. The list of expressions that are updated: `CreateMap`, `MapFromArrays`, `MapFromEntries`, `MapConcat`, `TransformKeys`. I manually checked all the places that create `MapType`, and came up with this list.
Note that, maps with map type key still exist, via reading from parquet files, converting from scala/java map, etc. This PR is not to completely forbid map as map key, but to avoid creating it by Spark itself.
Motivation: when I was trying to fix the duplicate key problem, I found it's impossible to do it with map type map key. I think it's reasonable to avoid map type map key for builtin functions.
## How was this patch tested?
updated test
Closes#23045 from cloud-fan/map-key.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As comment in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22326#issuecomment-424923967, we test the new added optimizer rule by end-to-end test in python side, need to add suites under `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer` like other optimizer rules.
## How was this patch tested?
new added UT
Closes#22955 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-25949.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Deprecated in Java 11, replace Class.newInstance with Class.getConstructor.getInstance, and primtive wrapper class constructors with valueOf or equivalent
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22988 from srowen/SPARK-25984.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add new option `locale` into CSVOptions/JSONOptions to make parsing date/timestamps in local languages possible. Currently the locale is hard coded to `Locale.US`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added two tests for parsing a date from CSV/JSON - `ноя 2018`.
Closes#22951 from MaxGekk/locale.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Remove some AccumulableInfo .apply() methods
- Remove non-label-specific multiclass precision/recall/fScore in favor of accuracy
- Remove toDegrees/toRadians in favor of degrees/radians (SparkR: only deprecated)
- Remove approxCountDistinct in favor of approx_count_distinct (SparkR: only deprecated)
- Remove unused Python StorageLevel constants
- Remove Dataset unionAll in favor of union
- Remove unused multiclass option in libsvm parsing
- Remove references to deprecated spark configs like spark.yarn.am.port
- Remove TaskContext.isRunningLocally
- Remove ShuffleMetrics.shuffle* methods
- Remove BaseReadWrite.context in favor of session
- Remove Column.!== in favor of =!=
- Remove Dataset.explode
- Remove Dataset.registerTempTable
- Remove SQLContext.getOrCreate, setActive, clearActive, constructors
Not touched yet
- everything else in MLLib
- HiveContext
- Anything deprecated more recently than 2.0.0, generally
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#22921 from srowen/SPARK-25908.
Lead-authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
New functions takes a struct and converts it to a CSV strings using passed CSV options. It accepts the same CSV options as CSV data source does.
## How was this patch tested?
Added `CsvExpressionsSuite`, `CsvFunctionsSuite` as well as R, Python and SQL tests similar to tests for `to_json()`
Closes#22626 from MaxGekk/to_csv.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add new function - *schema_of_csv()* which infers schema of CSV string literal. The result of the function is a string containing a schema in DDL format. For example:
```sql
select schema_of_csv('1|abc', map('delimiter', '|'))
```
```
struct<_c0:int,_c1:string>
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests to `CsvFunctionsSuite`, `CsvExpressionsSuite` and SQL tests to `csv-functions.sql`
Closes#22666 from MaxGekk/schema_of_csv-function.
Lead-authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes a new optimization rule that replaces `Literal(null, _)` with `FalseLiteral` in conditions in `Join` and `Filter`, predicates in `If`, conditions in `CaseWhen`.
The idea is that some expressions evaluate to `false` if the underlying expression is `null` (as an example see `GeneratePredicate$create` or `doGenCode` and `eval` methods in `If` and `CaseWhen`). Therefore, we can replace `Literal(null, _)` with `FalseLiteral`, which can lead to more optimizations later on.
Let’s consider a few examples.
```
val df = spark.range(1, 100).select($"id".as("l"), ($"id" > 50).as("b"))
df.createOrReplaceTempView("t")
df.createOrReplaceTempView("p")
```
**Case 1**
```
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM t WHERE if(l > 10, false, NULL)").explain(true)
// without the new rule
…
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
+- Filter if ((id#0L > 10)) false else null
+- Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=Some(12))
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
+- *(1) Filter if ((id#0L > 10)) false else null
+- *(1) Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=12)
// with the new rule
…
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
LocalRelation <empty>, [l#2L, s#3]
== Physical Plan ==
LocalTableScan <empty>, [l#2L, s#3]
```
**Case 2**
```
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM t WHERE CASE WHEN l < 10 THEN null WHEN l > 40 THEN false ELSE null END”).explain(true)
// without the new rule
...
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
+- Filter CASE WHEN (id#0L < 10) THEN null WHEN (id#0L > 40) THEN false ELSE null END
+- Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=Some(12))
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
+- *(1) Filter CASE WHEN (id#0L < 10) THEN null WHEN (id#0L > 40) THEN false ELSE null END
+- *(1) Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=12)
// with the new rule
...
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
LocalRelation <empty>, [l#2L, s#3]
== Physical Plan ==
LocalTableScan <empty>, [l#2L, s#3]
```
**Case 3**
```
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM t JOIN p ON IF(t.l > p.l, null, false)").explain(true)
// without the new rule
...
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Join Inner, if ((l#2L > l#37L)) null else false
:- Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
: +- Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=Some(12))
+- Project [id#0L AS l#37L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#38]
+- Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=Some(12))
== Physical Plan ==
BroadcastNestedLoopJoin BuildRight, Inner, if ((l#2L > l#37L)) null else false
:- *(1) Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
: +- *(1) Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=12)
+- BroadcastExchange IdentityBroadcastMode
+- *(2) Project [id#0L AS l#37L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#38]
+- *(2) Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=12)
// with the new rule
...
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
LocalRelation <empty>, [l#2L, s#3, l#37L, s#38]
```
## How was this patch tested?
This PR comes with a set of dedicated tests.
Closes#22857 from aokolnychyi/spark-25860.
Authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we compare attributes, in general, we should always refer to semantic equality, as the default `equal` method can return false when there are "cosmetic" differences between them, but still they are the same thing; at least we have to consider them so when analyzing/optimizing queries.
The PR focuses on the usage and comparison of the `output` of a `LogicalPlan`, which is a `Seq[Attribute]` in `AliasViewChild`. In this case, using equality implicitly fails to check the semantic equality. This results in the operator failing to stabilize.
## How was this patch tested?
running the tests with the patch provided by maryannxue in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22060Closes#22713 from mgaido91/SPARK-25691.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set main args correctly in BenchmarkBase, to make it accessible for its subclass.
It will benefit:
- BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark
- AvroWriteBenchmark
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22872 from yucai/main_args.
Authored-by: yucai <yyu1@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implements Every, Some, Any aggregates in SQL. These new aggregate expressions are analyzed in normal way and rewritten to equivalent existing aggregate expressions in the optimizer.
Every(x) => Min(x) where x is boolean.
Some(x) => Max(x) where x is boolean.
Any is a synonym for Some.
SQL
```
explain extended select every(v) from test_agg group by k;
```
Plan :
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Aggregate ['k], [unresolvedalias('every('v), None)]
+- 'UnresolvedRelation `test_agg`
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
every(v): boolean
Aggregate [k#0], [every(v#1) AS every(v)#5]
+- SubqueryAlias `test_agg`
+- Project [k#0, v#1]
+- SubqueryAlias `test_agg`
+- LocalRelation [k#0, v#1]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Aggregate [k#0], [min(v#1) AS every(v)#5]
+- LocalRelation [k#0, v#1]
== Physical Plan ==
*(2) HashAggregate(keys=[k#0], functions=[min(v#1)], output=[every(v)#5])
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(k#0, 200)
+- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[k#0], functions=[partial_min(v#1)], output=[k#0, min#7])
+- LocalTableScan [k#0, v#1]
Time taken: 0.512 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in SQLQueryTestSuite, DataframeAggregateSuite
Closes#22809 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-19851-specific-rewrite.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is inspired during implementing #21732. For now `ScalaReflection` needs to consider how `ExpressionEncoder` uses generated serializers and deserializers. And `ExpressionEncoder` has a weird `flat` flag. After discussion with cloud-fan, it seems to be better to refactor `ExpressionEncoder`. It should make SPARK-24762 easier to do.
To summarize the proposed changes:
1. `serializerFor` and `deserializerFor` return expressions for serializing/deserializing an input expression for a given type. They are private and should not be called directly.
2. `serializerForType` and `deserializerForType` returns an expression for serializing/deserializing for an object of type T to/from Spark SQL representation. It assumes the input object/Spark SQL representation is located at ordinal 0 of a row.
So in other words, `serializerForType` and `deserializerForType` return expressions for atomically serializing/deserializing JVM object to/from Spark SQL value.
A serializer returned by `serializerForType` will serialize an object at `row(0)` to a corresponding Spark SQL representation, e.g. primitive type, array, map, struct.
A deserializer returned by `deserializerForType` will deserialize an input field at `row(0)` to an object with given type.
3. The construction of `ExpressionEncoder` takes a pair of serializer and deserializer for type `T`. It uses them to create serializer and deserializer for T <-> row serialization. Now `ExpressionEncoder` dones't need to remember if serializer is flat or not. When we need to construct new `ExpressionEncoder` based on existing ones, we only need to change input location in the atomic serializer and deserializer.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22749 from viirya/SPARK-24762-refactor.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to switch `from_json` on `FailureSafeParser`, and to make the function compatible to `PERMISSIVE` mode by default, and to support the `FAILFAST` mode as well. The `DROPMALFORMED` mode is not supported by `from_json`.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by existing `JsonSuite`/`CSVSuite`, `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonExpressionsSuite` as well as new tests for `from_json` which checks different modes.
Closes#22237 from MaxGekk/from_json-failuresafe.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The serializers of `RowEncoder` use few `If` Catalyst expression which inherits `ComplexTypeMergingExpression` that will check input data types.
It is possible to generate serializers which fail the check and can't to access the data type of serializers. When producing If expression, we should use the same data type at its input expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Closes#22785 from viirya/SPARK-25791.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up PR for #22259. The extra field added in `ScalaUDF` with the original PR was declared optional, but should be indeed required, otherwise callers of `ScalaUDF`'s constructor could ignore this new field and cause the result to be incorrect. This PR makes the new field required and changes its name to `handleNullForInputs`.
#22259 breaks the previous behavior for null-handling of primitive-type input parameters. For example, for `val f = udf({(x: Int, y: Any) => x})`, `f(null, "str")` should return `null` but would return `0` after #22259. In this PR, all UDF methods except `def udf(f: AnyRef, dataType: DataType): UserDefinedFunction` have been restored with the original behavior. The only exception is documented in the Spark SQL migration guide.
In addition, now that we have this extra field indicating if a null-test should be applied on the corresponding input value, we can also make use of this flag to avoid the rule `HandleNullInputsForUDF` being applied infinitely.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT in UDFSuite
Passed affected existing UTs:
AnalysisSuite
UDFSuite
Closes#22732 from maryannxue/spark-25044-followup.
Lead-authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Literal.value` should have a value a value corresponding to `dataType`. This pr added code to verify it and fixed the existing tests to do so.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified the existing tests.
Closes#22724 from maropu/SPARK-25734.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
