Commit graph

1724 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wenchen Fan 1f2776df6e [SPARK-16181][SQL] outer join with isNull filter may return wrong result
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The root cause is: the output attributes of outer join are derived from its children, while they are actually different attributes(outer join can return null).

We have already added some special logic to handle it, e.g. `PushPredicateThroughJoin` won't push down predicates through outer join side, `FixNullability`.

This PR adds one more special logic in `FoldablePropagation`.

## How was this patch tested?

new test in `DataFrameSuite`

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13884 from cloud-fan/bug.
2016-06-28 10:26:01 -07:00
Prashant Sharma f6b497fcdd [SPARK-16128][SQL] Allow setting length of characters to be truncated to, in Dataset.show function.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Allowing truncate to a specific number of character is convenient at times, especially while operating from the REPL. Sometimes those last few characters make all the difference, and showing everything brings in whole lot of noise.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests. + 1 new test in DataFrameSuite.

For SparkR and pyspark, existing tests and manual testing.

Author: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Author: Prashant Sharma <prashant@apache.org>

Closes #13839 from ScrapCodes/add_truncateTo_DF.show.
2016-06-28 17:11:06 +05:30
Herman van Hovell 02a029df43 [SPARK-16220][SQL] Add scope to show functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark currently shows all functions when issue a `SHOW FUNCTIONS` command. This PR refines the `SHOW FUNCTIONS` command by allowing users to select all functions, user defined function or system functions. The following syntax can be used:

**ALL** (default)
```SHOW FUNCTIONS```
```SHOW ALL FUNCTIONS```

**SYSTEM**
```SHOW SYSTEM FUNCTIONS```

**USER**
```SHOW USER FUNCTIONS```
## How was this patch tested?
Updated tests and added tests to the DDLSuite

Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>

Closes #13929 from hvanhovell/SPARK-16220.
2016-06-27 16:57:34 -07:00
Bill Chambers c48c8ebc0a [SPARK-16220][SQL] Revert Change to Bring Back SHOW FUNCTIONS Functionality
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

- Fix tests regarding show functions functionality
- Revert `catalog.ListFunctions` and `SHOW FUNCTIONS` to return to `Spark 1.X` functionality.

Cherry picked changes from this PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413/files

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests.

Author: Bill Chambers <bill@databricks.com>
Author: Bill Chambers <wchambers@ischool.berkeley.edu>

Closes #13916 from anabranch/master.
2016-06-27 11:50:34 -07:00
Dongjoon Hyun 11f420b4bb [SPARK-10591][SQL][TEST] Add a testcase to ensure if checkAnswer handles map correctly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR adds a testcase to ensure if `checkAnswer` handles Map type correctly.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the jenkins tests.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #13913 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-10591.
2016-06-27 19:04:50 +08:00
Dongjoon Hyun a7d29499dc [SPARK-16186] [SQL] Support partition batch pruning with IN predicate in InMemoryTableScanExec
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

One of the most frequent usage patterns for Spark SQL is using **cached tables**. This PR improves `InMemoryTableScanExec` to handle `IN` predicate efficiently by pruning partition batches. Of course, the performance improvement varies over the queries and the datasets. But, for the following simple query, the query duration in Spark UI goes from 9 seconds to 50~90ms. It's about over 100 times faster.

**Before**
```scala
$ bin/spark-shell --driver-memory 6G
scala> val df = spark.range(2000000000)
scala> df.createOrReplaceTempView("t")
scala> spark.catalog.cacheTable("t")
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect()    // About 2 mins
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect()    // less than 90ms
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect()  // 9 seconds
```

**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // less than 90ms
```

This PR has impacts over 35 queries of TPC-DS if the tables are cached.
Note that this optimization is applied for `IN`.  To apply `IN` predicate having more than 10 items, `spark.sql.optimizer.inSetConversionThreshold` option should be increased.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins tests (including new testcases).

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #13887 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16186.
2016-06-24 22:34:31 -07:00
Takeshi YAMAMURO d2e44d7db8 [SPARK-16192][SQL] Add type checks in CollectSet
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`CollectSet` cannot have map-typed data because MapTypeData does not implement `equals`.
So, this pr is to add type checks in `CheckAnalysis`.

## How was this patch tested?
Added tests to check failures when we found map-typed data in `CollectSet`.

Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>

Closes #13892 from maropu/SPARK-16192.
2016-06-24 21:07:03 -07:00
Dilip Biswal 9053054c7f [SPARK-16195][SQL] Allow users to specify empty over clause in window expressions through dataset API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow to specify empty over clause in window expressions through dataset API

In SQL, its allowed to specify an empty OVER clause in the window expression.

```SQL
select area, sum(product) over () as c from windowData
where product > 3 group by area, product
having avg(month) > 0 order by avg(month), product
```
In this case the analytic function sum is presented based on all the rows of the result set

Currently its not allowed through dataset API and is handled in this PR.

## How was this patch tested?

Added a new test in DataframeWindowSuite

Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>

Closes #13897 from dilipbiswal/spark-empty-over.
2016-06-24 17:27:33 -07:00
Davies Liu 20768dade2 Revert "[SPARK-16186] [SQL] Support partition batch pruning with IN predicate in InMemoryTableScanExec"
This reverts commit a65bcbc27d.
2016-06-24 17:21:18 -07:00
Dongjoon Hyun a65bcbc27d [SPARK-16186] [SQL] Support partition batch pruning with IN predicate in InMemoryTableScanExec
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

One of the most frequent usage patterns for Spark SQL is using **cached tables**. This PR improves `InMemoryTableScanExec` to handle `IN` predicate efficiently by pruning partition batches. Of course, the performance improvement varies over the queries and the datasets. But, for the following simple query, the query duration in Spark UI goes from 9 seconds to 50~90ms. It's about over 100 times faster.

**Before**
```scala
$ bin/spark-shell --driver-memory 6G
scala> val df = spark.range(2000000000)
scala> df.createOrReplaceTempView("t")
scala> spark.catalog.cacheTable("t")
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect()    // About 2 mins
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect()    // less than 90ms
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect()  // 9 seconds
```

**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // less than 90ms
```

This PR has impacts over 35 queries of TPC-DS if the tables are cached.
Note that this optimization is applied for `IN`.  To apply `IN` predicate having more than 10 items, `spark.sql.optimizer.inSetConversionThreshold` option should be increased.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins tests (including new testcases).

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #13887 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16186.
2016-06-24 17:13:13 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal cc71d4fa37 [SPARK-16123] Avoid NegativeArraySizeException while reserving additional capacity in VectorizedColumnReader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch fixes an overflow bug in vectorized parquet reader where both off-heap and on-heap variants of `ColumnVector.reserve()` can unfortunately overflow while reserving additional capacity during reads.

## How was this patch tested?

Manual Tests

Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>

Closes #13832 from sameeragarwal/negative-array.
2016-06-23 18:21:41 -07:00
Dongjoon Hyun 264bc63623 [SPARK-16165][SQL] Fix the update logic for InMemoryTableScanExec.readBatches
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, `readBatches` accumulator of `InMemoryTableScanExec` is updated only when `spark.sql.inMemoryColumnarStorage.partitionPruning` is true. Although this metric is used for only testing purpose, we had better have correct metric without considering SQL options.

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins tests (including a new testcase).

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #13870 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16165.
2016-06-24 07:19:20 +08:00
Shixiong Zhu 0e4bdebece [SPARK-15443][SQL] Fix 'explain' for streaming Dataset
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

- Fix the `explain` command for streaming Dataset/DataFrame. E.g.,
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true) AS value#7]
+- 'MapElements <function1>, obj#6: java.lang.String
   +- 'DeserializeToObject unresolveddeserializer(createexternalrow(getcolumnbyordinal(0, StringType).toString, StructField(value,StringType,true))), obj#5: org.apache.spark.sql.Row
      +- Filter <function1>.apply
         +- StreamingRelation FileSource[/Users/zsx/stream], [value#0]

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
value: string
SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true) AS value#7]
+- MapElements <function1>, obj#6: java.lang.String
   +- DeserializeToObject createexternalrow(value#0.toString, StructField(value,StringType,true)), obj#5: org.apache.spark.sql.Row
      +- Filter <function1>.apply
         +- StreamingRelation FileSource[/Users/zsx/stream], [value#0]

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true) AS value#7]
+- MapElements <function1>, obj#6: java.lang.String
   +- DeserializeToObject createexternalrow(value#0.toString, StructField(value,StringType,true)), obj#5: org.apache.spark.sql.Row
      +- Filter <function1>.apply
         +- StreamingRelation FileSource[/Users/zsx/stream], [value#0]

== Physical Plan ==
*SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true) AS value#7]
+- *MapElements <function1>, obj#6: java.lang.String
   +- *DeserializeToObject createexternalrow(value#0.toString, StructField(value,StringType,true)), obj#5: org.apache.spark.sql.Row
      +- *Filter <function1>.apply
         +- StreamingRelation FileSource[/Users/zsx/stream], [value#0]
```

- Add `StreamingQuery.explain` to display the last execution plan. E.g.,
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true) AS value#7]
+- MapElements <function1>, obj#6: java.lang.String
   +- DeserializeToObject createexternalrow(value#12.toString, StructField(value,StringType,true)), obj#5: org.apache.spark.sql.Row
      +- Filter <function1>.apply
         +- Relation[value#12] text

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
value: string
SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true) AS value#7]
+- MapElements <function1>, obj#6: java.lang.String
   +- DeserializeToObject createexternalrow(value#12.toString, StructField(value,StringType,true)), obj#5: org.apache.spark.sql.Row
      +- Filter <function1>.apply
         +- Relation[value#12] text

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true) AS value#7]
+- MapElements <function1>, obj#6: java.lang.String
   +- DeserializeToObject createexternalrow(value#12.toString, StructField(value,StringType,true)), obj#5: org.apache.spark.sql.Row
      +- Filter <function1>.apply
         +- Relation[value#12] text

== Physical Plan ==
*SerializeFromObject [staticinvoke(class org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String, StringType, fromString, input[0, java.lang.String, true], true) AS value#7]
+- *MapElements <function1>, obj#6: java.lang.String
   +- *DeserializeToObject createexternalrow(value#12.toString, StructField(value,StringType,true)), obj#5: org.apache.spark.sql.Row
      +- *Filter <function1>.apply
         +- *Scan text [value#12] Format: org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.text.TextFileFormat1836ab91, InputPaths: file:/Users/zsx/stream/a.txt, file:/Users/zsx/stream/b.txt, file:/Users/zsx/stream/c.txt, PushedFilters: [], ReadSchema: struct<value:string>
```

## How was this patch tested?

The added unit tests.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #13815 from zsxwing/sdf-explain.
2016-06-23 16:04:16 -07:00
Davies Liu 10396d9505 [SPARK-16163] [SQL] Cache the statistics for logical plans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This calculation of statistics is not trivial anymore, it could be very slow on large query (for example, TPC-DS Q64 took several minutes to plan).

During the planning of a query, the statistics of any logical plan should not change (even InMemoryRelation), so we should use `lazy val` to cache the statistics.

For InMemoryRelation, the statistics could be updated after materialization, it's only useful when used in another query (before planning), because once we finished the planning, the statistics will not be used anymore.

## How was this patch tested?

Testsed with TPC-DS Q64, it could be planned in a second after the patch.

Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>

Closes #13871 from davies/fix_statistics.
2016-06-23 11:48:48 -07:00
Shixiong Zhu d85bb10ce4 [SPARK-16116][SQL] ConsoleSink should not require checkpointLocation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When the user uses `ConsoleSink`, we should use a temp location if `checkpointLocation` is not specified.

## How was this patch tested?

The added unit test.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #13817 from zsxwing/console-checkpoint.
2016-06-23 10:46:20 -07:00
bomeng 925884a612 [SPARK-15230][SQL] distinct() does not handle column name with dot properly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When table is created with column name containing dot, distinct() will fail to run. For example,
```scala
val rowRDD = sparkContext.parallelize(Seq(Row(1), Row(1), Row(2)))
val schema = StructType(Array(StructField("column.with.dot", IntegerType, nullable = false)))
val df = spark.createDataFrame(rowRDD, schema)
```
running the following will have no problem:
```scala
df.select(new Column("`column.with.dot`"))
```
but running the query with additional distinct() will cause exception:
```scala
df.select(new Column("`column.with.dot`")).distinct()
```

The issue is that distinct() will try to resolve the column name, but the column name in the schema does not have backtick with it. So the solution is to add the backtick before passing the column name to resolve().

## How was this patch tested?

Added a new test case.

Author: bomeng <bmeng@us.ibm.com>

Closes #13140 from bomeng/SPARK-15230.
2016-06-23 11:06:19 +08:00
gatorsmile 9f990fa3f9 [SPARK-16024][SQL][TEST] Verify Column Comment for Data Source Tables
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to improve test coverage. It verifies whether `Comment` of `Column` can be appropriate handled.

The test cases verify the related parts in Parser, both SQL and DataFrameWriter interface, and both Hive Metastore catalog and In-memory catalog.

#### How was this patch tested?
N/A

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #13764 from gatorsmile/dataSourceComment.
2016-06-23 09:12:20 +08:00
Wenchen Fan 01277d4b25 [SPARK-16097][SQL] Encoders.tuple should handle null object correctly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Although the top level input object can not be null, but when we use `Encoders.tuple` to combine 2 encoders, their input objects are not top level anymore and can be null. We should handle this case.

## How was this patch tested?

new test in DatasetSuite

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13807 from cloud-fan/bug.
2016-06-22 18:32:14 +08:00
Yin Huai 39ad53f7ff [SPARK-16121] ListingFileCatalog does not list in parallel anymore
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Seems the fix of SPARK-14959 breaks the parallel partitioning discovery. This PR fixes the problem

## How was this patch tested?
Tested manually. (This PR also adds a proper test for SPARK-14959)

Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>

Closes #13830 from yhuai/SPARK-16121.
2016-06-22 18:07:07 +08:00
Shixiong Zhu c399c7f0e4 [SPARK-16002][SQL] Sleep when no new data arrives to avoid 100% CPU usage
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add a configuration to allow people to set a minimum polling delay when no new data arrives (default is 10ms). This PR also cleans up some INFO logs.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing unit tests.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #13718 from zsxwing/SPARK-16002.
2016-06-21 12:42:49 -07:00
hyukjinkwon 4f7f1c4362 [SPARK-16044][SQL] input_file_name() returns empty strings in data sources based on NewHadoopRDD
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR makes `input_file_name()` function return the file paths not empty strings for external data sources based on `NewHadoopRDD`, such as [spark-redshift](cba5eee1ab/src/main/scala/com/databricks/spark/redshift/RedshiftRelation.scala (L149)) and [spark-xml](https://github.com/databricks/spark-xml/blob/master/src/main/scala/com/databricks/spark/xml/util/XmlFile.scala#L39-L47).

The codes with the external data sources below:

```scala
df.select(input_file_name).show()
```

will produce

- **Before**
  ```
+-----------------+
|input_file_name()|
+-----------------+
|                 |
+-----------------+
```

- **After**
  ```
+--------------------+
|   input_file_name()|
+--------------------+
|file:/private/var...|
+--------------------+
```

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests in `ColumnExpressionSuite`.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #13759 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-16044.
2016-06-20 21:55:34 -07:00
gatorsmile d9a3a2a0be [SPARK-16056][SPARK-16057][SPARK-16058][SQL] Fix Multiple Bugs in Column Partitioning in JDBC Source
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to fix the following bugs:

**Issue 1: Wrong Results when lowerBound is larger than upperBound in Column Partitioning**
```scala
spark.read.jdbc(
  url = urlWithUserAndPass,
  table = "TEST.seq",
  columnName = "id",
  lowerBound = 4,
  upperBound = 0,
  numPartitions = 3,
  connectionProperties = new Properties)
```
**Before code changes:**
The returned results are wrong and the generated partitions are wrong:
```
  Part 0 id < 3 or id is null
  Part 1 id >= 3 AND id < 2
  Part 2 id >= 2
```
**After code changes:**
Issue an `IllegalArgumentException` exception:
```
Operation not allowed: the lower bound of partitioning column is larger than the upper bound. lowerBound: 5; higherBound: 1
```
**Issue 2: numPartitions is more than the number of key values between upper and lower bounds**
```scala
spark.read.jdbc(
  url = urlWithUserAndPass,
  table = "TEST.seq",
  columnName = "id",
  lowerBound = 1,
  upperBound = 5,
  numPartitions = 10,
  connectionProperties = new Properties)
```
**Before code changes:**
Returned correct results but the generated partitions are very inefficient, like:
```
Partition 0: id < 1 or id is null
Partition 1: id >= 1 AND id < 1
Partition 2: id >= 1 AND id < 1
Partition 3: id >= 1 AND id < 1
Partition 4: id >= 1 AND id < 1
Partition 5: id >= 1 AND id < 1
Partition 6: id >= 1 AND id < 1
Partition 7: id >= 1 AND id < 1
Partition 8: id >= 1 AND id < 1
Partition 9: id >= 1
```
**After code changes:**
Adjust `numPartitions` and can return the correct answers:
```
Partition 0: id < 2 or id is null
Partition 1: id >= 2 AND id < 3
Partition 2: id >= 3 AND id < 4
Partition 3: id >= 4
```
**Issue 3: java.lang.ArithmeticException when numPartitions is zero**
```Scala
spark.read.jdbc(
  url = urlWithUserAndPass,
  table = "TEST.seq",
  columnName = "id",
  lowerBound = 0,
  upperBound = 4,
  numPartitions = 0,
  connectionProperties = new Properties)
```
**Before code changes:**
Got the following exception:
```
  java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero
```
**After code changes:**
Able to return a correct answer by disabling column partitioning when numPartitions is equal to or less than zero

#### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to verify the results

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #13773 from gatorsmile/jdbcPartitioning.
2016-06-20 21:49:33 -07:00
Tathagata Das b99129cc45 [SPARK-15982][SPARK-16009][SPARK-16007][SQL] Harmonize the behavior of DataFrameReader.text/csv/json/parquet/orc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Issues with current reader behavior.
- `text()` without args returns an empty DF with no columns -> inconsistent, its expected that text will always return a DF with `value` string field,
- `textFile()` without args fails with exception because of the above reason, it expected the DF returned by `text()` to have a `value` field.
- `orc()` does not have var args, inconsistent with others
- `json(single-arg)` was removed, but that caused source compatibility issues - [SPARK-16009](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16009)
- user specified schema was not respected when `text/csv/...` were used with no args - [SPARK-16007](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16007)

The solution I am implementing is to do the following.
- For each format, there will be a single argument method, and a vararg method. For json, parquet, csv, text, this means adding json(string), etc.. For orc, this means adding orc(varargs).
- Remove the special handling of text(), csv(), etc. that returns empty dataframe with no fields. Rather pass on the empty sequence of paths to the datasource, and let each datasource handle it right. For e.g, text data source, should return empty DF with schema (value: string)
- Deduped docs and fixed their formatting.

## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests for Scala and Java tests

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #13727 from tdas/SPARK-15982.
2016-06-20 14:52:28 -07:00
Shixiong Zhu 5cfabec872 [SPARK-16050][TESTS] Remove the flaky test: ConsoleSinkSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

ConsoleSinkSuite just collects content from stdout and compare them with the expected string. However, because Spark may not stop some background threads at once, there is a race condition that other threads are outputting logs to **stdout** while ConsoleSinkSuite is running. Then it will make ConsoleSinkSuite fail.

Therefore, I just deleted `ConsoleSinkSuite`. If we want to test ConsoleSinkSuite in future, we should refactoring ConsoleSink to make it testable instead of depending on stdout. Therefore, this test is useless and I just delete it.

## How was this patch tested?

Just removed a flaky test.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #13776 from zsxwing/SPARK-16050.
2016-06-20 10:35:37 -07:00
Yin Huai 905f774b71 [SPARK-16030][SQL] Allow specifying static partitions when inserting to data source tables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the static partition support to INSERT statement when the target table is a data source table.

## How was this patch tested?
New tests in InsertIntoHiveTableSuite and DataSourceAnalysisSuite.

**Note: This PR is based on https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13766. The last commit is the actual change.**

Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>

Closes #13769 from yhuai/SPARK-16030-1.
2016-06-20 20:17:47 +08:00
Yin Huai 6d0f921aed [SPARK-16036][SPARK-16037][SPARK-16034][SQL] Follow up code clean up and improvement
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is the follow-up PR for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13754/files and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13749. I will comment inline to explain my changes.

## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.

Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>

Closes #13766 from yhuai/caseSensitivity.
2016-06-19 21:45:53 -07:00
Matei Zaharia 4f17fddcd5 [SPARK-16031] Add debug-only socket source in Structured Streaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch adds a text-based socket source similar to the one in Spark Streaming for debugging and tutorials. The source is clearly marked as debug-only so that users don't try to run it in production applications, because this type of source cannot provide HA without storing a lot of state in Spark.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests and manual tests in spark-shell.

Author: Matei Zaharia <matei@databricks.com>

Closes #13748 from mateiz/socket-source.
2016-06-19 21:27:04 -07:00
Sean Zhong ce3b98bae2 [SPARK-16034][SQL] Checks the partition columns when calling dataFrame.write.mode("append").saveAsTable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`DataFrameWriter` can be used to append data to existing data source tables. It becomes tricky when partition columns used in `DataFrameWriter.partitionBy(columns)` don't match the actual partition columns of the underlying table. This pull request enforces the check so that the partition columns of these two always match.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>

Closes #13749 from clockfly/SPARK-16034.
2016-06-18 10:41:33 -07:00
Wenchen Fan 3d010c8375 [SPARK-16036][SPARK-16037][SQL] fix various table insertion problems
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The current table insertion has some weird behaviours:

1. inserting into a partitioned table with mismatch columns has confusing error message for hive table, and wrong result for datasource table
2. inserting into a partitioned table without partition list has wrong result for hive table.

This PR fixes these 2 problems.

## How was this patch tested?

new test in hive `SQLQuerySuite`

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13754 from cloud-fan/insert2.
2016-06-18 10:32:27 -07:00
Shixiong Zhu d0ac0e6f43 [SPARK-16020][SQL] Fix complete mode aggregation with console sink
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

We cannot use `limit` on DataFrame in ConsoleSink because it will use a wrong planner. This PR just collects `DataFrame` and calls `show` on a batch DataFrame based on the result. This is fine since ConsoleSink is only for debugging.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually confirmed ConsoleSink now works with complete mode aggregation.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #13740 from zsxwing/complete-console.
2016-06-17 21:58:10 -07:00
hyukjinkwon ebb9a3b6fd [SPARK-15916][SQL] JDBC filter push down should respect operator precedence
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR fixes the problem that the precedence order is messed when pushing where-clause expression to JDBC layer.

**Case 1:**

For sql `select * from table where (a or b) and c`, the where-clause is wrongly converted to JDBC where-clause `a or (b and c)` after filter push down. The consequence is that JDBC may returns less or more rows than expected.

**Case 2:**

For sql `select * from table where always_false_condition`, the result table may not be empty if the JDBC RDD is partitioned using where-clause:
```
spark.read.jdbc(url, table, predicates = Array("partition 1 where clause", "partition 2 where clause"...)
```

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

This PR also close #13640

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>

Closes #13743 from clockfly/SPARK-15916.
2016-06-17 17:11:38 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal 34d6c4cd11 Remove non-obvious conf settings from TPCDS benchmark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

My fault -- these 2 conf entries are mysteriously hidden inside the benchmark code and makes it non-obvious to disable whole stage codegen and/or the vectorized parquet reader.

PS: Didn't attach a JIRA as this change should otherwise be a no-op (both these conf are enabled by default in Spark)

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>

Closes #13726 from sameeragarwal/tpcds-conf.
2016-06-17 09:47:41 -07:00
Yin Huai d9c6628c47 [SPARK-15991] SparkContext.hadoopConfiguration should be always the base of hadoop conf created by SessionState
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before this patch, after a SparkSession has been created, hadoop conf set directly to SparkContext.hadoopConfiguration will not affect the hadoop conf created by SessionState. This patch makes the change to always use SparkContext.hadoopConfiguration  as the base.

This patch also changes the behavior of hive-site.xml support added in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689/. With this patch, we will load hive-site.xml to SparkContext.hadoopConfiguration.

## How was this patch tested?
New test in SparkSessionBuilderSuite.

Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>

Closes #13711 from yhuai/SPARK-15991.
2016-06-16 17:06:24 -07:00
Huaxin Gao 62d2fa5e99 [SPARK-15749][SQL] make the error message more meaningful
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

For table test1 (C1 varchar (10), C2 varchar (10)), when I insert a row using
```
sqlContext.sql("insert into test1 values ('abc', 'def', 1)")
```
I got error message

```
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: RelationC1#0,C2#1 JDBCRelation(test1)
requires that the query in the SELECT clause of the INSERT INTO/OVERWRITE statement
generates the same number of columns as its schema.
```
The error message is a little confusing. In my simple insert statement, it doesn't have a SELECT clause.

I will change the error message to a more general one

```
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: RelationC1#0,C2#1 JDBCRelation(test1)
requires that the data to be inserted have the same number of columns as the target table.
```

## How was this patch tested?

I tested the patch using my simple unit test, but it's a very trivial change and I don't think I need to check in any test.

Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>

Closes #13492 from huaxingao/spark-15749.
2016-06-16 14:37:10 -07:00
Herman van Hovell f9bf15d9bd [SPARK-15977][SQL] Fix TRUNCATE TABLE for Spark specific datasource tables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`TRUNCATE TABLE` is currently broken for Spark specific datasource tables (json, csv, ...). This PR correctly sets the location for these datasources which allows them to be truncated.

## How was this patch tested?
Extended the datasources `TRUNCATE TABLE` tests in `DDLSuite`.

Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>

Closes #13697 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15977.
2016-06-16 13:47:36 -07:00
gatorsmile 6451cf9270 [SPARK-15862][SQL] Better Error Message When Having Database Name in CACHE TABLE AS SELECT
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
~~If the temp table already exists, we should not silently replace it when doing `CACHE TABLE AS SELECT`. This is inconsistent with the behavior of `CREAT VIEW` or `CREATE TABLE`. This PR is to fix this silent drop.~~

~~Maybe, we also can introduce new syntax for replacing the existing one. For example, in Hive, to replace a view, the syntax should be like `ALTER VIEW AS SELECT` or `CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW AS SELECT`~~

The table name in `CACHE TABLE AS SELECT` should NOT contain database prefix like "database.table". Thus, this PR captures this in Parser and outputs a better error message, instead of reporting the view already exists.

In addition, refactoring the `Parser` to generate table identifiers instead of returning the table name string.

#### How was this patch tested?
- Added a test case for caching and uncaching qualified table names
- Fixed a few test cases that do not drop temp table at the end
- Added the related test case for the issue resolved in this PR

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>

Closes #13572 from gatorsmile/cacheTableAsSelect.
2016-06-16 10:01:59 -07:00
Herman van Hovell b75f454f94 [SPARK-15824][SQL] Execute WITH .... INSERT ... statements immediately
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently immediately execute `INSERT` commands when they are issued. This is not the case as soon as we use a `WITH` to define common table expressions, for example:
```sql
WITH
tbl AS (SELECT * FROM x WHERE id = 10)
INSERT INTO y
SELECT *
FROM   tbl
```

This PR fixes this problem. This PR closes https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13561 (which fixes the a instance of this problem in the ThriftSever).

## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `InsertSuite`

Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>

Closes #13678 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15824.
2016-06-15 21:33:26 -07:00
Reynold Xin 865e7cc38d [SPARK-15979][SQL] Rename various Parquet support classes.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch renames various Parquet support classes from CatalystAbc to ParquetAbc. This new naming makes more sense for two reasons:

1. These are not optimizer related (i.e. Catalyst) classes.
2. We are in the Spark code base, and as a result it'd be more clear to call out these are Parquet support classes, rather than some Spark classes.

## How was this patch tested?
Renamed test cases as well.

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes #13696 from rxin/parquet-rename.
2016-06-15 20:05:08 -07:00
Tathagata Das 9a5071996b [SPARK-15953][WIP][STREAMING] Renamed ContinuousQuery to StreamingQuery
Renamed for simplicity, so that its obvious that its related to streaming.

Existing unit tests.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #13673 from tdas/SPARK-15953.
2016-06-15 10:46:07 -07:00
bomeng 42a28caf10 [SPARK-15952][SQL] fix "show databases" ordering issue
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Two issues I've found for "show databases" command:

1. The returned database name list was not sorted, it only works when "like" was used together; (HIVE will always return a sorted list)

2. When it is used as sql("show databases").show, it will output a table with column named as "result", but for sql("show tables").show, it will output the column name as "tableName", so I think we should be consistent and use "databaseName" at least.

## How was this patch tested?

Updated existing test case to test its ordering as well.

Author: bomeng <bmeng@us.ibm.com>

Closes #13671 from bomeng/SPARK-15952.
2016-06-14 18:35:29 -07:00
Tathagata Das 214adb14b8 [SPARK-15933][SQL][STREAMING] Refactored DF reader-writer to use readStream and writeStream for streaming DFs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the DataFrameReader/Writer has method that are needed for streaming and non-streaming DFs. This is quite awkward because each method in them through runtime exception for one case or the other. So rather having half the methods throw runtime exceptions, its just better to have a different reader/writer API for streams.

- [x] Python API!!

## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests + two sets of unit tests for DataFrameReader/Writer and DataStreamReader/Writer.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #13653 from tdas/SPARK-15933.
2016-06-14 17:58:45 -07:00
Cheng Lian bd39ffe35c [SPARK-15895][SQL] Filters out metadata files while doing partition discovery
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Take the following directory layout as an example:

```
dir/
+- p0=0/
   |-_metadata
   +- p1=0/
      |-part-00001.parquet
      |-part-00002.parquet
      |-...
```

The `_metadata` file under `p0=0` shouldn't fail partition discovery.

This PR filters output all metadata files whose names start with `_` while doing partition discovery.

## How was this patch tested?

New unit test added in `ParquetPartitionDiscoverySuite`.

Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>

Closes #13623 from liancheng/spark-15895-partition-disco-no-metafiles.
2016-06-14 12:13:12 -07:00
gatorsmile df4ea6614d [SPARK-15864][SQL] Fix Inconsistent Behaviors when Uncaching Non-cached Tables
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To uncache a table, we have three different ways:
- _SQL interface_: `UNCACHE TABLE`
- _DataSet API_: `sparkSession.catalog.uncacheTable`
- _DataSet API_: `sparkSession.table(tableName).unpersist()`

When the table is not cached,
- _SQL interface_: `UNCACHE TABLE non-cachedTable` -> **no error message**
- _Dataset API_: `sparkSession.catalog.uncacheTable("non-cachedTable")` -> **report a strange error message:**
```requirement failed: Table [a: int] is not cached```
- _Dataset API_: `sparkSession.table("non-cachedTable").unpersist()` -> **no error message**

This PR will make them consistent. No operation if the table has already been uncached.

In addition, this PR also removes `uncacheQuery` and renames `tryUncacheQuery` to `uncacheQuery`, and documents it that it's noop if the table has already been uncached

#### How was this patch tested?
Improved the existing test case for verifying the cases when the table has not been cached.
Also added test cases for verifying the cases when the table does not exist

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>

Closes #13593 from gatorsmile/uncacheNonCachedTable.
2016-06-14 11:44:37 -07:00
Takuya UESHIN c5b7355819 [SPARK-15915][SQL] Logical plans should use canonicalized plan when override sameResult.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`DataFrame` with plan overriding `sameResult` but not using canonicalized plan to compare can't cacheTable.

The example is like:

```
    val localRelation = Seq(1, 2, 3).toDF()
    localRelation.createOrReplaceTempView("localRelation")

    spark.catalog.cacheTable("localRelation")
    assert(
      localRelation.queryExecution.withCachedData.collect {
        case i: InMemoryRelation => i
      }.size == 1)
```

and this will fail as:

```
ArrayBuffer() had size 0 instead of expected size 1
```

The reason is that when do `spark.catalog.cacheTable("localRelation")`, `CacheManager` tries to cache for the plan wrapped by `SubqueryAlias` but when planning for the DataFrame `localRelation`, `CacheManager` tries to find cached table for the not-wrapped plan because the plan for DataFrame `localRelation` is not wrapped.
Some plans like `LocalRelation`, `LogicalRDD`, etc. override `sameResult` method, but not use canonicalized plan to compare so the `CacheManager` can't detect the plans are the same.

This pr modifies them to use canonicalized plan when override `sameResult` method.

## How was this patch tested?

Added a test to check if DataFrame with plan overriding sameResult but not using canonicalized plan to compare can cacheTable.

Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>

Closes #13638 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-15915.
2016-06-14 10:52:13 -07:00
Sean Owen 6151d2641f [MINOR] Clean up several build warnings, mostly due to internal use of old accumulators
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Another PR to clean up recent build warnings. This particularly cleans up several instances of the old accumulator API usage in tests that are straightforward to update. I think this qualifies as "minor".

## How was this patch tested?

Jenkins

Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>

Closes #13642 from srowen/BuildWarnings.
2016-06-14 09:40:07 -07:00
Sandeep Singh 1842cdd4ee [SPARK-15663][SQL] SparkSession.catalog.listFunctions shouldn't include the list of built-in functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkSession.catalog.listFunctions currently returns all functions, including the list of built-in functions. This makes the method not as useful because anytime it is run the result set contains over 100 built-in functions.

## How was this patch tested?
CatalogSuite

Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>

Closes #13413 from techaddict/SPARK-15663.
2016-06-13 21:58:52 -07:00
Sean Zhong 7b9071eeaa [SPARK-15910][SQL] Check schema consistency when using Kryo encoder to convert DataFrame to Dataset
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR enforces schema check when converting DataFrame to Dataset using Kryo encoder. For example.

**Before the change:**

Schema is NOT checked when converting DataFrame to Dataset using kryo encoder.
```
scala> case class B(b: Int)
scala> implicit val encoder = Encoders.kryo[B]
scala> val df = Seq((1)).toDF("b")
scala> val ds = df.as[B] // Schema compatibility is NOT checked
```

**After the change:**
Report AnalysisException since the schema is NOT compatible.
```
scala> val ds = Seq((1)).toDF("b").as[B]
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'CAST(`b` AS BINARY)' due to data type mismatch: cannot cast IntegerType to BinaryType;
...
```

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>

Closes #13632 from clockfly/spark-15910.
2016-06-13 17:43:55 -07:00
Josh Rosen a6babca1bf [SPARK-15929] Fix portability of DataFrameSuite path globbing tests
The DataFrameSuite regression tests for SPARK-13774 fail in my environment because they attempt to glob over all of `/mnt` and some of the subdirectories restrictive permissions which cause the test to fail.

This patch rewrites those tests to remove all environment-specific assumptions; the tests now create their own unique temporary paths for use in the tests.

Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>

Closes #13649 from JoshRosen/SPARK-15929.
2016-06-13 17:06:22 -07:00
Wenchen Fan c4b1ad0209 [SPARK-15887][SQL] Bring back the hive-site.xml support for Spark 2.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Right now, Spark 2.0 does not load hive-site.xml. Based on users' feedback, it seems make sense to still load this conf file.

This PR adds a `hadoopConf` API in `SharedState`, which is `sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration` by default. When users are under hive context, `SharedState.hadoopConf` will load hive-site.xml and append its configs to `sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration`.

When we need to read hadoop config in spark sql, we should call `SessionState.newHadoopConf`, which contains `sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration`, hive-site.xml and sql configs.

## How was this patch tested?

new test in `HiveDataFrameSuite`

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13611 from cloud-fan/hive-site.
2016-06-13 14:57:35 -07:00
Tathagata Das c654ae2140 [SPARK-15889][SQL][STREAMING] Add a unique id to ContinuousQuery
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

ContinuousQueries have names that are unique across all the active ones. However, when queries are rapidly restarted with same name, it causes races conditions with the listener. A listener event from a stopped query can arrive after the query has been restarted, leading to complexities in monitoring infrastructure.

Along with this change, I have also consolidated all the messy code paths to start queries with different sinks.

## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests, and existing unit tests.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #13613 from tdas/SPARK-15889.
2016-06-13 13:44:46 -07:00
gatorsmile 3b7fb84cf8 [SPARK-15676][SQL] Disallow Column Names as Partition Columns For Hive Tables
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When creating a Hive Table (not data source tables), a common error users might make is to specify an existing column name as a partition column. Below is what Hive returns in this case:
```
hive> CREATE TABLE partitioned (id bigint, data string) PARTITIONED BY (data string, part string);
FAILED: SemanticException [Error 10035]: Column repeated in partitioning columns
```
Currently, the error we issued is very confusing:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException: MetaException(message:For direct MetaStore DB connections, we don't support retries at the client level.);
```
This PR is to fix the above issue by capturing the usage error in `Parser`.

#### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case to `DDLCommandSuite`

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>

Closes #13415 from gatorsmile/partitionColumnsInTableSchema.
2016-06-13 13:22:46 -07:00
Tathagata Das a6a18a4573 [HOTFIX][MINOR][SQL] Revert " Standardize 'continuous queries' to 'streaming D…
This reverts commit d32e227787.
Broke build - https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Compile/job/spark-branch-2.0-compile-maven-hadoop-2.3/326/console

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #13645 from tdas/build-break.
2016-06-13 12:47:47 -07:00
Liwei Lin d32e227787 [MINOR][SQL] Standardize 'continuous queries' to 'streaming Datasets/DataFrames'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch does some replacing (as `streaming Datasets/DataFrames` is the term we've chosen in [SPARK-15593](00c310133d)):
 - `continuous queries` -> `streaming Datasets/DataFrames`
 - `non-continuous queries` -> `non-streaming Datasets/DataFrames`

This patch also adds `test("check foreach() can only be called on streaming Datasets/DataFrames")`.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>

Closes #13595 from lw-lin/continuous-queries-to-streaming-dss-dfs.
2016-06-13 11:49:15 -07:00
Wenchen Fan cd47e23374 [SPARK-15814][SQL] Aggregator can return null result
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It's similar to the bug fixed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13425, we should consider null object and wrap the `CreateStruct` with `If` to do null check.

This PR also improves the test framework to test the objects of `Dataset[T]` directly, instead of calling `toDF` and compare the rows.

## How was this patch tested?

new test in `DatasetAggregatorSuite`

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13553 from cloud-fan/agg-null.
2016-06-13 09:58:48 -07:00
Wenchen Fan e2ab79d5ea [SPARK-15898][SQL] DataFrameReader.text should return DataFrame
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

We want to maintain API compatibility for DataFrameReader.text, and will introduce a new API called DataFrameReader.textFile which returns Dataset[String].

affected PRs:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11731
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13104
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13184

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13604 from cloud-fan/revert.
2016-06-12 21:36:41 -07:00
Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier 1f8f2b5c2a [SPARK-15370][SQL] Fix count bug
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes the COUNT bug in the `RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery` rule.

After this change, the rule tests the expression at the root of the correlated subquery to determine whether the expression returns `NULL` on empty input. If the expression does not return `NULL`, the rule generates additional logic in the `Project` operator above the rewritten subquery. This additional logic intercepts `NULL` values coming from the outer join and replaces them with the value that the subquery's expression would return on empty input.

This PR takes over https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155. It only fixes an issue with `Literal` construction and style issues.  All credits should go frreiss.

# How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests to cover all branches of the updated rule (see changes to `SubquerySuite`).
Ran all existing automated regression tests after merging with latest trunk.

Author: frreiss <frreiss@us.ibm.com>
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>

Closes #13629 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15370-cleanup.
2016-06-12 21:30:32 -07:00
Takuya UESHIN caebd7f262 [SPARK-15870][SQL] DataFrame can't execute after uncacheTable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

If a cached `DataFrame` executed more than once and then do `uncacheTable` like the following:

```
    val selectStar = sql("SELECT * FROM testData WHERE key = 1")
    selectStar.createOrReplaceTempView("selectStar")

    spark.catalog.cacheTable("selectStar")
    checkAnswer(
      selectStar,
      Seq(Row(1, "1")))

    spark.catalog.uncacheTable("selectStar")
    checkAnswer(
      selectStar,
      Seq(Row(1, "1")))
```

, then the uncached `DataFrame` can't execute because of `Task not serializable` exception like:

```
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Task not serializable
	at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.ensureSerializable(ClosureCleaner.scala:298)
	at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.org$apache$spark$util$ClosureCleaner$$clean(ClosureCleaner.scala:288)
	at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.clean(ClosureCleaner.scala:108)
	at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.clean(SparkContext.scala:2038)
	at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.runJob(SparkContext.scala:1897)
	at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.runJob(SparkContext.scala:1912)
	at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$collect$1.apply(RDD.scala:884)
	at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
	at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:112)
	at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.withScope(RDD.scala:357)
	at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.collect(RDD.scala:883)
	at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeCollect(SparkPlan.scala:290)
...
Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Accumulator must be registered before send to executor
	at org.apache.spark.util.AccumulatorV2.writeReplace(AccumulatorV2.scala:153)
	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
	at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeWriteReplace(ObjectStreamClass.java:1118)
	at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1136)
	at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1548)
	at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
	at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1432)
...
```

Notice that `DataFrame` uncached with `DataFrame.unpersist()` works, but with `spark.catalog.uncacheTable` doesn't work.

This pr reverts a part of cf38fe0 not to unregister `batchStats` accumulator, which is not needed to be unregistered here because it will be done by `ContextCleaner` after it is collected by GC.

## How was this patch tested?

Added a test to check if DataFrame can execute after uncacheTable and other existing tests.
But I made a test to check if the accumulator was cleared as `ignore` because the test would be flaky.

Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>

Closes #13596 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-15870.
2016-06-12 16:37:44 -07:00
Herman van Hovell 20b8f2c32a [SPARK-15370][SQL] Revert PR "Update RewriteCorrelatedSuquery rule"
This reverts commit 9770f6ee60.

Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>

Closes #13626 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15370-revert.
2016-06-12 15:06:37 -07:00
Ioana Delaney 0ff8a68b9f [SPARK-15832][SQL] Embedded IN/EXISTS predicate subquery throws TreeNodeException
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Queries with embedded existential sub-query predicates throws exception when building the physical plan.

Example failing query:
```SQL
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t1")
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t2")
scala> sql("select c1 from t1 where (case when c2 in (select c2 from t2) then 2 else 3 end) IN (select c2 from t1)").show()

Binding attribute, tree: c2#239
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: c2#239
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:88)

  ...
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$.bindReference(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$$anonfun$4.apply(HashJoin.scala:66)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$$anonfun$4.apply(HashJoin.scala:66)
  at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
  at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
  at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:381)
  at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
  at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:285)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$class.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$joins$HashJoin$$x$8(HashJoin.scala:66)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$joins$HashJoin$$x$8$lzycompute(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$joins$HashJoin$$x$8(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$class.buildKeys(HashJoin.scala:63)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.buildKeys$lzycompute(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.buildKeys(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.requiredChildDistribution(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:52)
```

**Problem description:**
When the left hand side expression of an existential sub-query predicate contains another embedded sub-query predicate, the RewritePredicateSubquery optimizer rule does not resolve the embedded sub-query expressions into existential joins.For example, the above query has the following optimized plan, which fails during physical plan build.

```SQL
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [_1#224 AS c1#227]
+- Join LeftSemi, (CASE WHEN predicate-subquery#255 [(_2#225 = c2#239)] THEN 2 ELSE 3 END = c2#228#262)
   :  +- SubqueryAlias predicate-subquery#255 [(_2#225 = c2#239)]
   :     +- LocalRelation [c2#239]
   :- LocalRelation [_1#224, _2#225]
   +- LocalRelation [c2#228#262]

== Physical Plan ==
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: c2#239
```

**Solution:**
In RewritePredicateSubquery, before rewriting the outermost predicate sub-query, resolve any embedded existential sub-queries. The Optimized plan for the above query after the changes looks like below.

```SQL
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [_1#224 AS c1#227]
+- Join LeftSemi, (CASE WHEN exists#285 THEN 2 ELSE 3 END = c2#228#284)
   :- Join ExistenceJoin(exists#285), (_2#225 = c2#239)
   :  :- LocalRelation [_1#224, _2#225]
   :  +- LocalRelation [c2#239]
   +- LocalRelation [c2#228#284]

== Physical Plan ==
*Project [_1#224 AS c1#227]
+- *BroadcastHashJoin [CASE WHEN exists#285 THEN 2 ELSE 3 END], [c2#228#284], LeftSemi, BuildRight
   :- *BroadcastHashJoin [_2#225], [c2#239], ExistenceJoin(exists#285), BuildRight
   :  :- LocalTableScan [_1#224, _2#225]
   :  +- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as bigint)))
   :     +- LocalTableScan [c2#239]
   +- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as bigint)))
      +- LocalTableScan [c2#228#284]
      +- LocalTableScan [c222#36], [[111],[222]]
```

## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases in SubquerySuite.scala

Author: Ioana Delaney <ioanamdelaney@gmail.com>

Closes #13570 from ioana-delaney/fixEmbedSubPredV1.
2016-06-12 14:26:29 -07:00
frreiss 9770f6ee60 [SPARK-15370][SQL] Update RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery rule to fix COUNT bug
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes the COUNT bug in the `RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery` rule.

After this change, the rule tests the expression at the root of the correlated subquery to determine whether the expression returns NULL on empty input. If the expression does not return NULL, the rule generates additional logic in the Project operator above the rewritten subquery.  This additional logic intercepts NULL values coming from the outer join and replaces them with the value that the subquery's expression would return on empty input.

## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests to cover all branches of the updated rule (see changes to `SubquerySuite.scala`).
Ran all existing automated regression tests after merging with latest trunk.

Author: frreiss <frreiss@us.ibm.com>

Closes #13155 from frreiss/master.
2016-06-12 14:21:10 -07:00
Sean Owen f51dfe616b [SPARK-15086][CORE][STREAMING] Deprecate old Java accumulator API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

- Deprecate old Java accumulator API; should use Scala now
- Update Java tests and examples
- Don't bother testing old accumulator API in Java 8 (too)
- (fix a misspelling too)

## How was this patch tested?

Jenkins tests

Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>

Closes #13606 from srowen/SPARK-15086.
2016-06-12 11:44:33 -07:00
Dongjoon Hyun 3fd2ff4dd8 [SPARK-15807][SQL] Support varargs for dropDuplicates in Dataset/DataFrame
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `varargs`-types `dropDuplicates` functions in `Dataset/DataFrame`. Currently, `dropDuplicates` supports only `Seq` or `Array`.

**Before**
```scala
scala> val ds = spark.createDataFrame(Seq(("a", 1), ("b", 2), ("a", 2)))
ds: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [_1: string, _2: int]

scala> ds.dropDuplicates(Seq("_1", "_2"))
res0: org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = [_1: string, _2: int]

scala> ds.dropDuplicates("_1", "_2")
<console>:26: error: overloaded method value dropDuplicates with alternatives:
  (colNames: Array[String])org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] <and>
  (colNames: Seq[String])org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] <and>
  ()org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[org.apache.spark.sql.Row]
 cannot be applied to (String, String)
       ds.dropDuplicates("_1", "_2")
          ^
```

**After**
```scala
scala> val ds = spark.createDataFrame(Seq(("a", 1), ("b", 2), ("a", 2)))
ds: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [_1: string, _2: int]

scala> ds.dropDuplicates("_1", "_2")
res0: org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = [_1: string, _2: int]
```

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins tests with new testcases.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #13545 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15807.
2016-06-11 15:47:51 -07:00
Eric Liang c06c58bbbb [SPARK-14851][CORE] Support radix sort with nullable longs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This adds support for radix sort of nullable long fields. When a sort field is null and radix sort is enabled, we keep nulls in a separate region of the sort buffer so that radix sort does not need to deal with them. This also has performance benefits when sorting smaller integer types, since the current representation of nulls in two's complement (Long.MIN_VALUE) otherwise forces a full-width radix sort.

This strategy for nulls does mean the sort is no longer stable. cc davies

## How was this patch tested?

Existing randomized sort tests for correctness. I also tested some TPCDS queries and there does not seem to be any significant regression for non-null sorts.

Some test queries (best of 5 runs each).
Before change:
scala> val start = System.nanoTime; spark.range(5000000).selectExpr("if(id > 5, cast(hash(id) as long), NULL) as h").coalesce(1).orderBy("h").collect(); (System.nanoTime - start) / 1e6
start: Long = 3190437233227987
res3: Double = 4716.471091

After change:
scala> val start = System.nanoTime; spark.range(5000000).selectExpr("if(id > 5, cast(hash(id) as long), NULL) as h").coalesce(1).orderBy("h").collect(); (System.nanoTime - start) / 1e6
start: Long = 3190367870952791
res4: Double = 2981.143045

Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>

Closes #13161 from ericl/sc-2998.
2016-06-11 15:42:58 -07:00
Eric Liang 5bb4564cd4 [SPARK-15881] Update microbenchmark results for WideSchemaBenchmark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

These were not updated after performance improvements. To make updating them easier, I also moved the results from inline comments out into a file, which is auto-generated when the benchmark is re-run.

Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>

Closes #13607 from ericl/sc-3538.
2016-06-11 15:26:08 -07:00
Takeshi YAMAMURO cb5d933d86 [SPARK-15585][SQL] Add doc for turning off quotations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to add doc for turning off quotations because this behavior is different from `com.databricks.spark.csv`.

## How was this patch tested?
Check behavior  to put an empty string in csv options.

Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>

Closes #13616 from maropu/SPARK-15585-2.
2016-06-11 15:12:21 -07:00
Sameer Agarwal 468da03e23 [SPARK-15678] Add support to REFRESH data source paths
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Spark currently incorrectly continues to use cached data even if the underlying data is overwritten.

Current behavior:
```scala
val dir = "/tmp/test"
sqlContext.range(1000).write.mode("overwrite").parquet(dir)
val df = sqlContext.read.parquet(dir).cache()
df.count() // outputs 1000
sqlContext.range(10).write.mode("overwrite").parquet(dir)
sqlContext.read.parquet(dir).count() // outputs 1000 <---- We are still using the cached dataset
```

This patch fixes this bug by adding support for `REFRESH path` that invalidates and refreshes all the cached data (and the associated metadata) for any dataframe that contains the given data source path.

Expected behavior:
```scala
val dir = "/tmp/test"
sqlContext.range(1000).write.mode("overwrite").parquet(dir)
val df = sqlContext.read.parquet(dir).cache()
df.count() // outputs 1000
sqlContext.range(10).write.mode("overwrite").parquet(dir)
spark.catalog.refreshResource(dir)
sqlContext.read.parquet(dir).count() // outputs 10 <---- We are not using the cached dataset
```

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests for overwrites and appends in `ParquetQuerySuite` and `CachedTableSuite`.

Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>

Closes #13566 from sameeragarwal/refresh-path-2.
2016-06-10 20:43:18 -07:00
Sela 127a6678d7 [SPARK-15489][SQL] Dataset kryo encoder won't load custom user settings
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Serializer instantiation will consider existing SparkConf

## How was this patch tested?
manual test with `ImmutableList` (Guava) and `kryo-serializers`'s `Immutable*Serializer` implementations.

Added Test Suite.

(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Author: Sela <ansela@paypal.com>

Closes #13424 from amitsela/SPARK-15489.
2016-06-10 14:36:51 -07:00
Davies Liu aec502d911 [SPARK-15654] [SQL] fix non-splitable files for text based file formats
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, we always split the files when it's bigger than maxSplitBytes, but Hadoop LineRecordReader does not respect the splits for compressed files correctly, we should have a API for FileFormat to check whether the file could be splitted or not.

This PR is based on #13442, closes #13442

## How was this patch tested?

add regression tests.

Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>

Closes #13531 from davies/fix_split.
2016-06-10 14:32:43 -07:00
Herman van Hovell e05a2feebe [SPARK-15825] [SQL] Fix SMJ invalid results
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Code generated `SortMergeJoin` failed with wrong results when using structs as keys. This could (eventually) be traced back to the use of a wrong row reference when comparing structs.

## How was this patch tested?
TBD

Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>

Closes #13589 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15822.
2016-06-10 14:29:05 -07:00
Takuya UESHIN 667d4ea7b3 [SPARK-6320][SQL] Move planLater method into GenericStrategy.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR moves `QueryPlanner.planLater()` method into `GenericStrategy` for extra strategies to be able to use `planLater` in its strategy.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>

Closes #13147 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-6320.
2016-06-10 13:06:18 -07:00
Liwei Lin fb219029dd [SPARK-15871][SQL] Add assertNotPartitioned check in DataFrameWriter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It doesn't make sense to specify partitioning parameters, when we write data out from Datasets/DataFrames into `jdbc` tables or streaming `ForeachWriter`s.

This patch adds `assertNotPartitioned` check in `DataFrameWriter`.

<table>
<tr>
	<td align="center"><strong>operation</strong></td>
	<td align="center"><strong>should check not partitioned?</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">mode</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">outputMode</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">trigger</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">format</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">option/options</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">partitionBy</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">bucketBy</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">sortBy</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">save</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">queryName</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">startStream</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">foreach</td>
	<td align="center">yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">insertInto</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">saveAsTable</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">jdbc</td>
	<td align="center">yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">json</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">parquet</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">orc</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">text</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td align="center">csv</td>
	<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
</table>

## How was this patch tested?

New dedicated tests.

Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>

Closes #13597 from lw-lin/add-assertNotPartitioned.
2016-06-10 13:01:29 -07:00
Dongjoon Hyun 2413fce9d6 [SPARK-15743][SQL] Prevent saving with all-column partitioning
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When saving datasets on storage, `partitionBy` provides an easy way to construct the directory structure. However, if a user choose all columns as partition columns, some exceptions occurs.

- **ORC with all column partitioning**: `AnalysisException` on **future read** due to schema inference failure.
 ```scala
scala> spark.range(10).write.format("orc").mode("overwrite").partitionBy("id").save("/tmp/data")

scala> spark.read.format("orc").load("/tmp/data").collect()
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Unable to infer schema for ORC at /tmp/data. It must be specified manually;
```

- **Parquet with all-column partitioning**: `InvalidSchemaException` on **write execution** due to Parquet limitation.
 ```scala
scala> spark.range(100).write.format("parquet").mode("overwrite").partitionBy("id").save("/tmp/data")
[Stage 0:>                                                          (0 + 8) / 8]16/06/02 16:51:17
ERROR Utils: Aborting task
org.apache.parquet.schema.InvalidSchemaException: A group type can not be empty. Parquet does not support empty group without leaves. Empty group: spark_schema
... (lots of error messages)
```

Although some formats like JSON support all-column partitioning without any problem, it seems not a good idea to make lots of empty directories.

This PR prevents saving with all-column partitioning by consistently raising `AnalysisException` before executing save operation.

## How was this patch tested?

Newly added `PartitioningUtilsSuite`.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #13486 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15743.
2016-06-10 12:43:27 -07:00
Tathagata Das abdb5d42c5 [SPARK-15812][SQ][STREAMING] Added support for sorting after streaming aggregation with complete mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When the output mode is complete, then the output of a streaming aggregation essentially will contain the complete aggregates every time. So this is not different from a batch dataset within an incremental execution. Other non-streaming operations should be supported on this dataset. In this PR, I am just adding support for sorting, as it is a common useful functionality. Support for other operations will come later.

## How was this patch tested?
Additional unit tests.

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes #13549 from tdas/SPARK-15812.
2016-06-10 10:48:28 -07:00
Shixiong Zhu 00c310133d [SPARK-15593][SQL] Add DataFrameWriter.foreach to allow the user consuming data in ContinuousQuery
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

* Add DataFrameWriter.foreach to allow the user consuming data in ContinuousQuery
  * ForeachWriter is the interface for the user to consume partitions of data
* Add a type parameter T to DataFrameWriter

Usage
```Scala
val ds = spark.read....stream().as[String]
ds.....write
         .queryName(...)
        .option("checkpointLocation", ...)
        .foreach(new ForeachWriter[Int] {
          def open(partitionId: Long, version: Long): Boolean = {
             // prepare some resources for a partition
             // check `version` if possible and return `false` if this is a duplicated data to skip the data processing.
          }

          override def process(value: Int): Unit = {
              // process data
          }

          def close(errorOrNull: Throwable): Unit = {
             // release resources for a partition
             // check `errorOrNull` and handle the error if necessary.
          }
        })
```

## How was this patch tested?

New unit tests.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #13342 from zsxwing/foreach.
2016-06-10 00:11:46 -07:00
Dongjoon Hyun 5a3533e779 [SPARK-15696][SQL] Improve crosstab to have a consistent column order
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, `crosstab` returns a Dataframe having **random-order** columns obtained by just `distinct`. Also, the documentation of `crosstab` shows the result in a sorted order which is different from the current implementation. This PR explicitly constructs the columns in a sorted order in order to improve user experience. Also, this implementation gives the same result with the documentation.

**Before**
```scala
scala> spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 1), (2, 3), (3, 2), (3, 3))).toDF("key", "value").stat.crosstab("key", "value").show()
+---------+---+---+---+
|key_value|  3|  2|  1|
+---------+---+---+---+
|        2|  1|  0|  2|
|        1|  0|  1|  1|
|        3|  1|  1|  0|
+---------+---+---+---+

scala> spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "a"), (1, "b"), (2, "a"), (2, "a"), (2, "c"), (3, "b"), (3, "c"))).toDF("key", "value").stat.crosstab("key", "value").show()
+---------+---+---+---+
|key_value|  c|  a|  b|
+---------+---+---+---+
|        2|  1|  2|  0|
|        1|  0|  1|  1|
|        3|  1|  0|  1|
+---------+---+---+---+
```

**After**
```scala
scala> spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 1), (2, 3), (3, 2), (3, 3))).toDF("key", "value").stat.crosstab("key", "value").show()
+---------+---+---+---+
|key_value|  1|  2|  3|
+---------+---+---+---+
|        2|  2|  0|  1|
|        1|  1|  1|  0|
|        3|  0|  1|  1|
+---------+---+---+---+
scala> spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1, "a"), (1, "b"), (2, "a"), (2, "a"), (2, "c"), (3, "b"), (3, "c"))).toDF("key", "value").stat.crosstab("key", "value").show()
+---------+---+---+---+
|key_value|  a|  b|  c|
+---------+---+---+---+
|        2|  2|  0|  1|
|        1|  1|  1|  0|
|        3|  0|  1|  1|
+---------+---+---+---+
```

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins tests with updated testcases.

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #13436 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15696.
2016-06-09 22:46:51 -07:00
Eric Liang 6c5fd977fb [SPARK-15791] Fix NPE in ScalarSubquery
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The fix is pretty simple, just don't make the executedPlan transient in `ScalarSubquery` since it is referenced at execution time.

## How was this patch tested?

I verified the fix manually in non-local mode. It's not clear to me why the problem did not manifest in local mode, any suggestions?

cc davies

Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>

Closes #13569 from ericl/fix-scalar-npe.
2016-06-09 22:28:31 -07:00
Eric Liang b914e1930f [SPARK-15794] Should truncate toString() of very wide plans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

With very wide tables, e.g. thousands of fields, the plan output is unreadable and often causes OOMs due to inefficient string processing. This truncates all struct and operator field lists to a user configurable threshold to limit performance impact.

It would also be nice to optimize string generation to avoid these sort of O(n^2) slowdowns entirely (i.e. use StringBuilder everywhere including expressions), but this is probably too large of a change for 2.0 at this point, and truncation has other benefits for usability.

## How was this patch tested?

Added a microbenchmark that covers this case particularly well. I also ran the microbenchmark while varying the truncation threshold.

```
numFields = 5
wide shallowly nested struct field r/w:  Best/Avg Time(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 wide x 50 rows (write in-mem)            2336 / 2558          0.0       23364.4       0.1X

numFields = 25
wide shallowly nested struct field r/w:  Best/Avg Time(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 wide x 50 rows (write in-mem)            4237 / 4465          0.0       42367.9       0.1X

numFields = 100
wide shallowly nested struct field r/w:  Best/Avg Time(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 wide x 50 rows (write in-mem)          10458 / 11223          0.0      104582.0       0.0X

numFields = Infinity
wide shallowly nested struct field r/w:  Best/Avg Time(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info]   java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
```

Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Author: Eric Liang <ekhliang@gmail.com>

Closes #13537 from ericl/truncated-string.
2016-06-09 18:05:16 -07:00
Kevin Yu 99386fe398 [SPARK-15804][SQL] Include metadata in the toStructType
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The help function 'toStructType' in the AttributeSeq class doesn't include the metadata when it builds the StructField, so it causes this reported problem https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15804?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK when spark writes the the dataframe with the metadata to the parquet datasource.

The code path is when spark writes the dataframe to the parquet datasource through the InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand, spark will build the WriteRelation container, and it will call the help function 'toStructType' to create StructType which contains StructField, it should include the metadata there, otherwise, we will lost the user provide metadata.

## How was this patch tested?

added test case in ParquetQuerySuite.scala

(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Author: Kevin Yu <qyu@us.ibm.com>

Closes #13555 from kevinyu98/spark-15804.
2016-06-09 09:50:09 -07:00
Wenchen Fan afbe35cf5b [SPARK-14670] [SQL] allow updating driver side sql metrics
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

On the SparkUI right now we have this SQLTab that displays accumulator values per operator. However, it only displays metrics updated on the executors, not on the driver. It is useful to also include driver metrics, e.g. broadcast time.

This is a different version from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12427. This PR sends driver side accumulator updates right after the updating happens, not at the end of execution, by a new event.

## How was this patch tested?

new test in `SQLListenerSuite`

![qq20160606-0](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3182036/15841418/0eb137da-2c06-11e6-9068-5694eeb78530.png)

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13189 from cloud-fan/metrics.
2016-06-08 22:47:29 -07:00
Shixiong Zhu 0cfd6192f3 [SPARK-15580][SQL] Add ContinuousQueryInfo to make ContinuousQueryListener events serializable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR adds ContinuousQueryInfo to make ContinuousQueryListener events serializable in order to support writing events into the event log.

## How was this patch tested?

Jenkins unit tests.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #13335 from zsxwing/query-info.
2016-06-07 16:40:03 -07:00
Sean Zhong 890baaca50 [SPARK-15674][SQL] Deprecates "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE USING...", uses "CREAT TEMPORARY VIEW USING..." instead
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The current implementation of "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE USING datasource..." is NOT creating any intermediate temporary data directory like temporary HDFS folder, instead, it only stores a SQL string in memory. Probably we should use "TEMPORARY VIEW" instead.

This PR assumes a temporary table has to link with some temporary intermediate data. It follows the definition of temporary table like this (from [hortonworks doc](https://docs.hortonworks.com/HDPDocuments/HDP2/HDP-2.3.0/bk_dataintegration/content/temp-tables.html)):
> A temporary table is a convenient way for an application to automatically manage intermediate data generated during a complex query

**Example**:

```
scala> spark.sql("CREATE temporary view  my_tab7 (c1: String, c2: String)  USING org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVFileFormat  OPTIONS (PATH '/Users/seanzhong/csv/cars.csv')")
scala> spark.sql("select c1, c2 from my_tab7").show()
+----+-----+
|  c1|   c2|
+----+-----+
|year| make|
|2012|Tesla|
...
```

It NOW prints a **deprecation warning** if "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE USING..." is used.

```
scala> spark.sql("CREATE temporary table  my_tab7 (c1: String, c2: String)  USING org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVFileFormat  OPTIONS (PATH '/Users/seanzhong/csv/cars.csv')")
16/05/31 10:39:27 WARN SparkStrategies$DDLStrategy: CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tableName USING... is deprecated, please use CREATE TEMPORARY VIEW viewName USING... instead
```

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>

Closes #13414 from clockfly/create_temp_view_using.
2016-06-07 15:21:55 -07:00
Sean Zhong 0e0904a2fc [SPARK-15632][SQL] Typed Filter should NOT change the Dataset schema
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR makes sure the typed Filter doesn't change the Dataset schema.

**Before the change:**

```
scala> val df = spark.range(0,9)
scala> df.schema
res12: org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType = StructType(StructField(id,LongType,false))
scala> val afterFilter = df.filter(_=>true)
scala> afterFilter.schema   // !!! schema is CHANGED!!! Column name is changed from id to value, nullable is changed from false to true.
res13: org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType = StructType(StructField(value,LongType,true))

```

SerializeFromObject and DeserializeToObject are inserted to wrap the Filter, and these two can possibly change the schema of Dataset.

**After the change:**

```
scala> afterFilter.schema   // schema is NOT changed.
res47: org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType = StructType(StructField(id,LongType,false))
```

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>

Closes #13529 from clockfly/spark-15632.
2016-06-06 22:40:21 -07:00
Reynold Xin 32f2f95dbd Revert "[SPARK-15585][SQL] Fix NULL handling along with a spark-csv behaivour"
This reverts commit b7e8d1cb3c.
2016-06-05 23:40:13 -07:00
Takeshi YAMAMURO b7e8d1cb3c [SPARK-15585][SQL] Fix NULL handling along with a spark-csv behaivour
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixes the behaviour of `format("csv").option("quote", null)` along with one of spark-csv.
Also, it explicitly sets default values for CSV options in python.

## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in CSVSuite.

Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>

Closes #13372 from maropu/SPARK-15585.
2016-06-05 23:35:04 -07:00
Hiroshi Inoue 79268aa461 [SPARK-15704][SQL] add a test case in DatasetAggregatorSuite for regression testing
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This change fixes a crash in TungstenAggregate while executing "Dataset complex Aggregator" test case due to IndexOutOfBoundsException.

jira entry for detail: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15704

## How was this patch tested?
Using existing unit tests (including DatasetBenchmark)

Author: Hiroshi Inoue <inouehrs@jp.ibm.com>

Closes #13446 from inouehrs/fix_aggregate.
2016-06-05 20:10:33 -07:00
Lianhui Wang 2ca563cc45 [SPARK-15756][SQL] Support command 'create table stored as orcfile/parquetfile/avrofile'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now Spark SQL can support 'create table src stored as orc/parquet/avro' for orc/parquet/avro table. But Hive can support  both commands: ' stored as orc/parquet/avro' and 'stored as orcfile/parquetfile/avrofile'.
So this PR supports these keywords 'orcfile/parquetfile/avrofile' in Spark SQL.

## How was this patch tested?
add unit tests

Author: Lianhui Wang <lianhuiwang09@gmail.com>

Closes #13500 from lianhuiwang/SPARK-15756.
2016-06-03 22:19:22 -07:00
Davies Liu 3074f575a3 [SPARK-15391] [SQL] manage the temporary memory of timsort
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, the memory for temporary buffer used by TimSort is always allocated as on-heap without bookkeeping, it could cause OOM both in on-heap and off-heap mode.

This PR will try to manage that by preallocate it together with the pointer array, same with RadixSort. It both works for on-heap and off-heap mode.

This PR also change the loadFactor of BytesToBytesMap to 0.5 (it was 0.70), it enables use to radix sort also makes sure that we have enough memory for timsort.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>

Closes #13318 from davies/fix_timsort.
2016-06-03 16:45:09 -07:00
Wenchen Fan 11c83f83d5 [SPARK-15140][SQL] make the semantics of null input object for encoder clear
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

For input object of non-flat type, we can't encode it to row if it's null, as Spark SQL doesn't allow row to be null, only its columns can be null.

This PR explicitly add this constraint and throw exception if users break it.

## How was this patch tested?

several new tests

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13469 from cloud-fan/null-object.
2016-06-03 14:28:19 -07:00
Ioana Delaney 9e2eb13ca5 [SPARK-15677][SQL] Query with scalar sub-query in the SELECT list throws UnsupportedOperationException
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Queries with scalar sub-query in the SELECT list run against a local, in-memory relation throw
UnsupportedOperationException exception.

Problem repro:
```SQL
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t1")
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t2")
scala> sql("select (select min(c1) from t2) from t1").show()

java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot evaluate expression: scalar-subquery#62 []
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Unevaluable$class.eval(Expression.scala:215)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ScalarSubquery.eval(subquery.scala:62)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Alias.eval(namedExpressions.scala:142)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.InterpretedProjection.apply(Projection.scala:45)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.InterpretedProjection.apply(Projection.scala:29)
  at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
  at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
  at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:381)
  at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
  at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:285)
  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.ConvertToLocalRelation$$anonfun$apply$37.applyOrElse(Optimizer.scala:1473)
```
The problem is specific to local, in memory relations. It is caused by rule ConvertToLocalRelation, which attempts to push down
a scalar-subquery expression to the local tables.

The solution prevents the rule to apply if Project references scalar subqueries.

## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests to SubquerySuite.scala

Author: Ioana Delaney <ioanamdelaney@gmail.com>

Closes #13418 from ioana-delaney/scalarSubV2.
2016-06-03 12:04:27 -07:00
Wenchen Fan 190ff274fd [SPARK-15494][SQL] encoder code cleanup
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Our encoder framework has been evolved a lot, this PR tries to clean up the code to make it more readable and emphasise the concept that encoder should be used as a container of serde expressions.

1. move validation logic to analyzer instead of encoder
2. only have a `resolveAndBind` method in encoder instead of `resolve` and `bind`, as we don't have the encoder life cycle concept anymore.
3. `Dataset` don't need to keep a resolved encoder, as there is no such concept anymore. bound encoder is still needed to do serialization outside of query framework.
4. Using `BoundReference` to represent an unresolved field in deserializer expression is kind of weird, this PR adds a `GetColumnByOrdinal` for this purpose. (serializer expression still use `BoundReference`, we can replace it with `GetColumnByOrdinal` in follow-ups)

## How was this patch tested?

existing test

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>

Closes #13269 from cloud-fan/clean-encoder.
2016-06-03 00:43:02 -07:00
Dongjoon Hyun b9fcfb3bd1 [SPARK-15744][SQL] Rename two TungstenAggregation*Suites and update codgen/error messages/comments
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

For consistency, this PR updates some remaining `TungstenAggregation/SortBasedAggregate` after SPARK-15728.
- Update a comment in codegen in `VectorizedHashMapGenerator.scala`.
- `TungstenAggregationQuerySuite` --> `HashAggregationQuerySuite`
- `TungstenAggregationQueryWithControlledFallbackSuite` --> `HashAggregationQueryWithControlledFallbackSuite`
- Update two error messages in `SQLQuerySuite.scala` and `AggregationQuerySuite.scala`.
- Update several comments.

## How was this patch tested?

Manual (Only comment changes and test suite renamings).

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>

Closes #13487 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15744.
2016-06-03 00:36:06 -07:00
Xin Wu 76aa45d359 [SPARK-14959][SQL] handle partitioned table directories in distributed filesystem
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
##### The root cause:
When `DataSource.resolveRelation` is trying to build `ListingFileCatalog` object, `ListLeafFiles` is invoked where a list of `FileStatus` objects are retrieved from the provided path. These FileStatus objects include directories for the partitions (id=0 and id=2 in the jira). However, these directory `FileStatus` objects also try to invoke `getFileBlockLocations` where directory is not allowed for `DistributedFileSystem`, hence the exception happens.

This PR is to remove the block of code that invokes `getFileBlockLocations` for every FileStatus object of the provided path. Instead, we call `HadoopFsRelation.listLeafFiles` directly because this utility method filters out the directories before calling `getFileBlockLocations` for generating `LocatedFileStatus` objects.

## How was this patch tested?
Regtest is run. Manual test:
```
scala> spark.read.format("parquet").load("hdfs://bdavm009.svl.ibm.com:8020/user/spark/SPARK-14959_part").show
+-----+---+
| text| id|
+-----+---+
|hello|  0|
|world|  0|
|hello|  1|
|there|  1|
+-----+---+

       spark.read.format("orc").load("hdfs://bdavm009.svl.ibm.com:8020/user/spark/SPARK-14959_orc").show
+-----+---+
| text| id|
+-----+---+
|hello|  0|
|world|  0|
|hello|  1|
|there|  1|
+-----+---+
```
I also tried it with 2 level of partitioning.
I have not found a way to add test case in the unit test bucket that can test a real hdfs file location. Any suggestions will be appreciated.

Author: Xin Wu <xinwu@us.ibm.com>

Closes #13463 from xwu0226/SPARK-14959.
2016-06-02 22:49:17 -07:00
Eric Liang 901b2e69ea [SPARK-15724] Add benchmarks for performance over wide schemas
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This adds microbenchmarks for tracking performance of queries over very wide or deeply nested DataFrames. It seems performance degrades when DataFrames get thousands of columns wide or hundreds of fields deep.

## How was this patch tested?

Current results included.

cc rxin JoshRosen

Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>

Closes #13456 from ericl/sc-3468.
2016-06-02 19:42:05 -07:00
Wenchen Fan 6323e4bd76 [SPARK-15732][SQL] better error message when use java reserved keyword as field name
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When users create a case class and use java reserved keyword as field name, spark sql will generate illegal java code and throw exception at runtime.

This PR checks the field names when building the encoder, and if illegal field names are used, throw exception immediately with a good error message.

## How was this patch tested?

new test in DatasetSuite

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13485 from cloud-fan/java.
2016-06-02 18:13:04 -07:00
Wenchen Fan f34aadc54c [SPARK-15718][SQL] better error message for writing bucketed data
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently we don't support bucketing for `save` and `insertInto`.

For `save`, we just write the data out into a directory users specified, and it's not a table, we don't keep its metadata. When we read it back, we have no idea if the data is bucketed or not, so it doesn't make sense to use `save` to write bucketed data, as we can't use the bucket information anyway.

We can support it in the future, once we have features like bucket discovery, or we save bucket information in the data directory too, so that we don't need to rely on a metastore.

For `insertInto`, it inserts data into an existing table, so it doesn't make sense to specify bucket information, as we should get the bucket information from the existing table.

This PR improves the error message for the above 2  cases.
## How was this patch tested?

new test in `BukctedWriteSuite`

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #13452 from cloud-fan/error-msg.
2016-06-02 17:39:56 -07:00
Cheng Lian 4315427657 [SPARK-15719][SQL] Disables writing Parquet summary files by default
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR disables writing Parquet summary files by default (i.e., when Hadoop configuration "parquet.enable.summary-metadata" is not set).

Please refer to [SPARK-15719][1] for more details.

## How was this patch tested?

New test case added in `ParquetQuerySuite` to check no summary files are written by default.

[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15719

Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>

Closes #13455 from liancheng/spark-15719-disable-parquet-summary-files.
2016-06-02 16:16:27 -07:00
Sean Zhong d109a1beee [SPARK-15711][SQL] Ban CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE USING AS SELECT
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR bans syntax like `CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE USING AS SELECT`

`CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE ... USING ... AS ...` is not properly implemented, the temporary data is not cleaned up when the session exits. Before a full fix, we probably should ban this syntax.

This PR only impact syntax like `CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE ... USING ... AS ...`.
Other syntax like `CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE .. USING ...` and `CREATE TABLE ... USING ...` are not impacted.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>

Closes #13451 from clockfly/ban_create_temp_table_using_as.
2016-06-02 14:11:01 -07:00
gatorsmile 9aff6f3b19 [SPARK-15515][SQL] Error Handling in Running SQL Directly On Files
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to address the following issues:

- **ISSUE 1:** For ORC source format, we are reporting the strange error message when we did not enable Hive support:
```SQL
SQL Example:
  select id from `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc`.`file_path`
Error Message:
  Table or view not found: `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc`.`file_path`
```
Instead, we should issue the error message like:
```
Expected Error Message:
   The ORC data source must be used with Hive support enabled
```
- **ISSUE 2:** For the Avro format, we report the strange error message like:

The example query is like
  ```SQL
SQL Example:
  select id from `avro`.`file_path`
  select id from `com.databricks.spark.avro`.`file_path`
Error Message:
  Table or view not found: `com.databricks.spark.avro`.`file_path`
   ```
The desired message should be like:
```
Expected Error Message:
  Failed to find data source: avro. Please use Spark package http://spark-packages.org/package/databricks/spark-avro"
```

- ~~**ISSUE 3:** Unable to detect incompatibility libraries for Spark 2.0 in Data Source Resolution. We report a strange error message:~~

**Update**: The latest code changes contains
- For JDBC format, we added an extra checking in the rule `ResolveRelations` of `Analyzer`. Without the PR, Spark will return the error message like: `Option 'url' not specified`. Now, we are reporting `Unsupported data source type for direct query on files: jdbc`
- Make data source format name case incensitive so that error handling behaves consistent with the normal cases.
- Added the test cases for all the supported formats.

#### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to cover all the above issues

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>

Closes #13283 from gatorsmile/runSQLAgainstFile.
2016-06-02 13:22:43 -07:00
Reynold Xin 8900c8d8ff [SPARK-15728][SQL] Rename aggregate operators: HashAggregate and SortAggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently have two physical aggregate operators: TungstenAggregate and SortBasedAggregate. These names don't make a lot of sense from an end-user point of view. This patch renames them HashAggregate and SortAggregate.

## How was this patch tested?
Updated test cases.

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes #13465 from rxin/SPARK-15728.
2016-06-02 12:34:51 -07:00
hyukjinkwon 252417fa21 [SPARK-15322][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Use the new long accumulator for old int accumulators.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR corrects the remaining cases for using old accumulators.

This does not change some old accumulator usages below:

- `ImplicitSuite.scala` - Tests dedicated to old accumulator, for implicits with `AccumulatorParam`

- `AccumulatorSuite.scala` -  Tests dedicated to old accumulator

- `JavaSparkContext.scala` - For supporting old accumulators for Java API.

- `debug.package.scala` - Usage with `HashSet[String]`. Currently, it seems no implementation for this. I might be able to write an anonymous class for this but I didn't because I think it is not worth writing a lot of codes only for this.

- `SQLMetricsSuite.scala` - This uses the old accumulator for checking type boxing. It seems new accumulator does not require type boxing for this case whereas the old one requires (due to the use of generic).

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests cover this.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #13434 from HyukjinKwon/accum.
2016-06-02 11:16:24 -05:00