### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Delete duplicate code castsuit
### Why are the changes needed?
keep spark code clean
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
no need
Closes#28655 from GuoPhilipse/delete-duplicate-code-castsuit.
Lead-authored-by: GuoPhilipse <46367746+GuoPhilipse@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: GuoPhilipse <guofei_ok@126.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If `LLL`/`qqq` is used in the datetime pattern string, and the current JDK in use has a bug for the stand-alone form (see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8114833), throw an exception with a clear error message.
### Why are the changes needed?
to keep backward compatibility with Spark 2.4
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes
Spark 2.4
```
scala> sql("select date_format('1990-1-1', 'LLL')").show
+---------------------------------------------+
|date_format(CAST(1990-1-1 AS TIMESTAMP), LLL)|
+---------------------------------------------+
| Jan|
+---------------------------------------------+
```
Spark 3.0 with Java 11
```
scala> sql("select date_format('1990-1-1', 'LLL')").show
+---------------------------------------------+
|date_format(CAST(1990-1-1 AS TIMESTAMP), LLL)|
+---------------------------------------------+
| Jan|
+---------------------------------------------+
```
Spark 3.0 with Java 8
```
// before this PR
+---------------------------------------------+
|date_format(CAST(1990-1-1 AS TIMESTAMP), LLL)|
+---------------------------------------------+
| 1|
+---------------------------------------------+
// after this PR
scala> sql("select date_format('1990-1-1', 'LLL')").show
org.apache.spark.SparkUpgradeException
```
### How was this patch tested?
manual test with java 8 and 11
Closes#28646 from cloud-fan/format.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the legacy fractional formatter is based on the implementation from Spark 2.4 which formats the input timestamp twice:
```
val timestampString = ts.toString
val formatted = legacyFormatter.format(ts)
```
to strip trailing zeros. This PR proposes to avoid the first formatting by forming the second fraction directly.
### Why are the changes needed?
It makes legacy fractional formatter faster.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test "format fraction of second" in `TimestampFormatterSuite` + added test for timestamps before 1970-01-01 00:00:00Z
Closes#28643 from MaxGekk/optimize-legacy-fract-format.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR modifies some codegen related tests to test escape characters for datetime functions which are time zone aware. If the timezone is absent, the formatter could result in `null` caused by `java.util.NoSuchElementException: None.get` and bypassing the real intention of those test cases.
### Why are the changes needed?
fix tests
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
passing the modified test cases.
Closes#28653 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31835.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR extracts the logic for selecting the planned join type out of the `JoinSelection` rule and moves it to `JoinSelectionHelper` in Catalyst.
### Why are the changes needed?
This change both cleans up the code in `JoinSelection` and allows the logic to be in one place and be used from other rules that need to make decision based on the join type before the planning time.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`BuildSide`, `BuildLeft`, and `BuildRight` are moved from `org.apache.spark.sql.execution` to Catalyst in `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer`.
### How was this patch tested?
This is a refactoring, passes existing tests.
Closes#28540 from dbaliafroozeh/RefactorJoinSelection.
Authored-by: Ali Afroozeh <ali.afroozeh@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some alias of expression can not display correctly in schema. This PR will fix them.
- `ln`
- `rint`
- `lcase`
- `position`
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve the implement of some expression.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'Yes'. This PR will let user see the correct alias in schema.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#28551 from beliefer/show-correct-alias-in-schema.
Lead-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to set the alias, and class name in its `ExpressionInfo` for `struct`.
- Class name in `ExpressionInfo`
- from: `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.NamedStruct`
- to:`org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CreateNamedStruct`
- Alias name: `named_struct(col1, v, ...)` -> `struct(v, ...)`
This PR takes over https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28631
### Why are the changes needed?
To show the correct output name and class names to users.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
**Before:**
```scala
scala> sql("DESC FUNCTION struct").show(false)
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|function_desc |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Function: struct |
|Class: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.NamedStruct |
|Usage: struct(col1, col2, col3, ...) - Creates a struct with the given field values.|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
```scala
scala> sql("SELECT struct(1, 2)").show(false)
+------------------------------+
|named_struct(col1, 1, col2, 2)|
+------------------------------+
|[1, 2] |
+------------------------------+
```
**After:**
```scala
scala> sql("DESC FUNCTION struct").show(false)
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|function_desc |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Function: struct |
|Class: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CreateNamedStruct |
|Usage: struct(col1, col2, col3, ...) - Creates a struct with the given field values.|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
```scala
scala> sql("SELECT struct(1, 2)").show(false)
+------------+
|struct(1, 2)|
+------------+
|[1, 2] |
+------------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, and Jenkins tests.
Closes#28633 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31808.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Convert `java.time.Instant` to `java.sql.Timestamp` in pushed down filters to ORC datasource when Java 8 time API enabled.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix the exception raised while pushing date filters when `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled` is set to `true`:
```
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong value class java.time.Instant for TIMESTAMP.EQUALS leaf
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.sarg.SearchArgumentImpl$PredicateLeafImpl.checkLiteralType(SearchArgumentImpl.java:192)
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.sarg.SearchArgumentImpl$PredicateLeafImpl.<init>(SearchArgumentImpl.java:75)
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests to `OrcFilterSuite`.
Closes#28636 from MaxGekk/orc-timestamp-filter-pushdown.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Five continuous pattern characters with 'G/M/L/E/u/Q/q' means Narrow-Text Style while we turn to use `java.time.DateTimeFormatterBuilder` since 3.0.0, which output the leading single letter of the value, e.g. `December` would be `D`. In Spark 2.4 they mean Full-Text Style.
In this PR, we explicitly disable Narrow-Text Style for these pattern characters.
### Why are the changes needed?
Without this change, there will be a silent data change.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, queries with datetime operations using datetime patterns, e.g. `G/M/L/E/u` will fail if the pattern length is 5 and other patterns, e,g. 'k', 'm' also can accept a certain number of letters.
1. datetime patterns that are not supported by the new parser but the legacy will get SparkUpgradeException, e.g. "GGGGG", "MMMMM", "LLLLL", "EEEEE", "uuuuu", "aa", "aaa". 2 options are given to end-users, one is to use legacy mode, and the other is to follow the new online doc for correct datetime patterns
2, datetime patterns that are not supported by both the new parser and the legacy, e.g. "QQQQQ", "qqqqq", will get IllegalArgumentException which is captured by Spark internally and results NULL to end-users.
### How was this patch tested?
add unit tests
Closes#28592 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31771.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As we support multiple catalogs with DataSourceV2, we may need the `CURRENT_CATALOG` value expression from the SQL standard.
`CURRENT_CATALOG` is a general value specification in the SQL Standard, described as:
> The value specified by CURRENT_CATALOG is the character string that represents the current default catalog name.
### Why are the changes needed?
improve catalog v2 with ANSI SQL standard.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, add a new function `current_catalog()` to point the current active catalog
### How was this patch tested?
add ut
Closes#27006 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30352.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use `format()` methods for Java date-time types in `Row.jsonValue`. The PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28582 added the methods to avoid conversions to days and microseconds.
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid unnecessary overhead of converting Java date-time types to micros/days before formatting. Also formatters have to convert input micros/days back to Java types to pass instances to standard library API.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing tests in `RowJsonSuite`.
Closes#28620 from MaxGekk/toJson-format-Java-datetime-types.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add and register three new functions: `TIMESTAMP_SECONDS`, `TIMESTAMP_MILLIS` and `TIMESTAMP_MICROS`
A test is added.
Reference: [BigQuery](https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/standard-sql/timestamp_functions?hl=en#timestamp_seconds)
### Why are the changes needed?
People will have convenient way to get timestamps from seconds,milliseconds and microseconds.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, people will have the following ways to get timestamp:
```scala
sql("select TIMESTAMP_SECONDS(t.a) as timestamp from values(1230219000),(-1230219000) as t(a)").show(false)
```
```
+-------------------------+
|timestamp |
+-------------------------+
|2008-12-25 23:30:00|
|1931-01-07 16:30:00|
+-------------------------+
```
```scala
sql("select TIMESTAMP_MILLIS(t.a) as timestamp from values(1230219000123),(-1230219000123) as t(a)").show(false)
```
```
+-------------------------------+
|timestamp |
+-------------------------------+
|2008-12-25 23:30:00.123|
|1931-01-07 16:29:59.877|
+-------------------------------+
```
```scala
sql("select TIMESTAMP_MICROS(t.a) as timestamp from values(1230219000123123),(-1230219000123123) as t(a)").show(false)
```
```
+------------------------------------+
|timestamp |
+------------------------------------+
|2008-12-25 23:30:00.123123|
|1931-01-07 16:29:59.876877|
+------------------------------------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#28534 from TJX2014/master-SPARK-31710.
Authored-by: TJX2014 <xiaoxingstack@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allows missing hour fields when parsing date/timestamp string, with 0 as the default value.
If the year field is missing, this PR still fail the query by default, but provides a new legacy config to allow it and use 1970 as the default value. It's not a good default value, as it is not a leap year, which means that it would never parse Feb 29. We just pick it for backward compatibility.
### Why are the changes needed?
To keep backward compatibility with Spark 2.4.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Spark 2.4:
```
scala> sql("select to_timestamp('16', 'dd')").show
+------------------------+
|to_timestamp('16', 'dd')|
+------------------------+
| 1970-01-16 00:00:00|
+------------------------+
scala> sql("select to_date('16', 'dd')").show
+-------------------+
|to_date('16', 'dd')|
+-------------------+
| 1970-01-16|
+-------------------+
scala> sql("select to_timestamp('2019 40', 'yyyy mm')").show
+----------------------------------+
|to_timestamp('2019 40', 'yyyy mm')|
+----------------------------------+
| 2019-01-01 00:40:00|
+----------------------------------+
scala> sql("select to_timestamp('2019 10:10:10', 'yyyy hh:mm:ss')").show
+----------------------------------------------+
|to_timestamp('2019 10:10:10', 'yyyy hh:mm:ss')|
+----------------------------------------------+
| 2019-01-01 10:10:10|
+----------------------------------------------+
```
in branch 3.0
```
scala> sql("select to_timestamp('16', 'dd')").show
+--------------------+
|to_timestamp(16, dd)|
+--------------------+
| null|
+--------------------+
scala> sql("select to_date('16', 'dd')").show
+---------------+
|to_date(16, dd)|
+---------------+
| null|
+---------------+
scala> sql("select to_timestamp('2019 40', 'yyyy mm')").show
+------------------------------+
|to_timestamp(2019 40, yyyy mm)|
+------------------------------+
| 2019-01-01 00:00:00|
+------------------------------+
scala> sql("select to_timestamp('2019 10:10:10', 'yyyy hh:mm:ss')").show
+------------------------------------------+
|to_timestamp(2019 10:10:10, yyyy hh:mm:ss)|
+------------------------------------------+
| 2019-01-01 00:00:00|
+------------------------------------------+
```
After this PR, the behavior becomes the same as 2.4, if the legacy config is enabled.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#28576 from cloud-fan/bug.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Add new methods that accept date-time Java types to the DateFormatter and TimestampFormatter traits. The methods format input date-time instances to strings:
- TimestampFormatter:
- `def format(ts: Timestamp): String`
- `def format(instant: Instant): String`
- DateFormatter:
- `def format(date: Date): String`
- `def format(localDate: LocalDate): String`
2. Re-use the added methods from `HiveResult.toHiveString`
3. Borrow the code for formatting of `java.sql.Timestamp` from Spark 2.4 `DateTimeUtils.timestampToString` to `FractionTimestampFormatter` because legacy formatters don't support variable length patterns for seconds fractions.
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid unnecessary overhead of converting Java date-time types to micros/days before formatting. Also formatters have to convert input micros/days back to Java types to pass instances to standard library API.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing tests for toHiveString and new tests in `TimestampFormatterSuite`.
Closes#28582 from MaxGekk/opt-format-old-types.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a private `WriteBuilder` mixin trait: `SupportsStreamingUpdate`, so that the builtin v2 streaming sinks can still support the update mode.
Note: it's private because we don't have a proper design yet. I didn't take the proposal in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23702#discussion_r258593059 because we may want something more general, like updating by an expression `key1 = key2 + 10`.
### Why are the changes needed?
In Spark 2.4, all builtin v2 streaming sinks support all streaming output modes, and v2 sinks are enabled by default, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22911
It's too risky for 3.0 to go back to v1 sinks, so I propose to add a private trait to fix builtin v2 sinks, to keep backward compatibility.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now all the builtin v2 streaming sinks support all streaming output modes, which is the same as 2.4
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Closes#28523 from cloud-fan/update.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Eliminate the `UpCast` if it's child data type is already decimal type.
### Why are the changes needed?
While deserializing internal `Decimal` value to external `BigDecimal`(Java/Scala) value, Spark should also respect `Decimal`'s precision and scale, otherwise it will cause precision lost and look weird in some cases, e.g.:
```
sql("select cast(11111111111111111111111111111111111111 as decimal(38, 0)) as d")
.write.mode("overwrite")
.parquet(f.getAbsolutePath)
// can fail
spark.read.parquet(f.getAbsolutePath).as[BigDecimal]
```
```
[info] org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot up cast `d` from decimal(38,0) to decimal(38,18).
[info] The type path of the target object is:
[info] - root class: "scala.math.BigDecimal"
[info] You can either add an explicit cast to the input data or choose a higher precision type of the field in the target object;
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveUpCast$.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$analysis$Analyzer$ResolveUpCast$$fail(Analyzer.scala:3060)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveUpCast$$anonfun$apply$33$$anonfun$applyOrElse$174.applyOrElse(Analyzer.scala:3087)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveUpCast$$anonfun$apply$33$$anonfun$applyOrElse$174.applyOrElse(Analyzer.scala:3071)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$transformDown$1(TreeNode.scala:309)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:72)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:309)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$transformDown$3(TreeNode.scala:314)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, for cases(cause precision lost) mentioned above will fail before this change but run successfully after this change.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#28572 from Ngone51/fix_encoder.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change timestamp casting to int in ANSI and non-codegen mode, and make the error message consistent to the error messages in the codegen mode. In particular, casting to int is implemented in the same way as casting to short and byte.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. The error message in the non-codegen mode is diversed from the error message in the codegen mode.
2. The error message contains intermediate results that could confuse.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Before the changes, the error message of casting timestamp to int contains intermediate result but after the changes it contains the input values which causes arithmetic overflow.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suite `AnsiCastSuite`.
Closes#28549 from MaxGekk/fix-error-msg-cast-timestamp.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch effectively reverts SPARK-30098 via below changes:
* Removed the config
* Removed the changes done in parser rule
* Removed the usage of config in tests
* Removed tests which depend on the config
* Rolled back some tests to before SPARK-30098 which were affected by SPARK-30098
* Reflect the change into docs (migration doc, create table syntax)
### Why are the changes needed?
SPARK-30098 brought confusion and frustration on using create table DDL query, and we agreed about the bad effect on the change.
Please go through the [discussion thread](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Resolve-ambiguous-parser-rule-between-two-quot-create-table-quot-s-td29051i20.html) to see the details.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, compared to Spark 2.4.x. End users tried to experiment with Spark 3.0.0 previews will see the change that the behavior is going back to Spark 2.4.x, but I believe we won't guarantee compatibility in preview releases.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Closes#28517 from HeartSaVioR/revert-SPARK-30098.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set default time zone and locale in the default constructor of `SparkFunSuite`:
- Default time zone to `America/Los_Angeles`
- Default locale to `Locale.US`
### Why are the changes needed?
1. To deduplicate code by moving common time zone and locale settings to one place SparkFunSuite
2. To have the same default time zone and locale in all tests. This should prevent errors like https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28538
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
by running all affected test suites
Closes#28548 from MaxGekk/timezone-settings-SparkFunSuite.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Resolve the havingcondition with expanding the GROUPING SETS/CUBE/ROLLUP expressions together in `ResolveGroupingAnalytics`:
- Change the operations resolving directions to top-down.
- Try resolving the condition of the filter as though it is in the aggregate clause by reusing the function in `ResolveAggregateFunctions`
- Push the aggregate expressions into the aggregate which contains the expanded operations.
- Use UnresolvedHaving for all having clause.
### Why are the changes needed?
Correctness bug fix. See the demo and analysis in SPARK-31663.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, correctness bug fix for HAVING with GROUPING SETS.
### How was this patch tested?
New UTs added.
Closes#28501 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-31663.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added tests to check casting timestamps before 1970-01-01 00:00:00Z to ByteType, ShortType, IntegerType and LongType in ansi and non-ansi modes.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage and prevent errors while modifying the CAST expression code.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suites:
```
$ ./build/sbt "test:testOnly *CastSuite"
```
Closes#28531 from MaxGekk/test-cast-timestamp-to-byte.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR try to fix a bug in `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.ScriptTransformationExec`. This bug appears in our online cluster. `ScriptTransformationExec` should throw an exception, when user uses a python script which contains parse error. But current implementation may miss this case of failure.
### Why are the changes needed?
When user uses a python script which contains a parse error, there will be no output. So `scriptOutputReader.next(scriptOutputWritable) <= 0` matches, then we use `checkFailureAndPropagate()` to check the `proc`. But the `proc` may still be alive and `writerThread.exception` is not defined, `checkFailureAndPropagate` cannot check this case of failure. In the end, the Spark SQL job runs successfully and returns no result. In fact, the SparK SQL job should fails and shows the exception properly.
For example, the error python script is blow.
``` python
# encoding: utf8
import unknow_module
import sys
for line in sys.stdin:
print line
```
The bug can be reproduced by running the following code in our cluter.
```
spark.range(100*100).toDF("index").createOrReplaceTempView("test")
spark.sql("select TRANSFORM(index) USING 'python error_python.py' as new_index from test").collect.foreach(println)
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT
Closes#27724 from slamke/transformation.
Authored-by: sunke.03 <sunke.03@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When reading/writing datetime values that before the rebase switch day, from/to Avro/Parquet files, fail by default and ask users to set a config to explicitly do rebase or not.
### Why are the changes needed?
Rebase or not rebase have different behaviors and we should let users decide it explicitly. In most cases, users won't hit this exception as it only affects ancient datetime values.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now users will see an error when reading/writing dates before 1582-10-15 or timestamps before 1900-01-01 from/to Parquet/Avro files, with an error message to ask setting a config.
### How was this patch tested?
updated tests
Closes#28477 from cloud-fan/rebase.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Generates java.time.Instant/java.time.LocalDate for DateType/TimestampType by `RandomDataGenerator.forType` when the SQL config `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled` is set to `true`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage, and check java.time.Instant/java.time.LocalDate types in round trip tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running modified test suites `RowEncoderSuite`, `RandomDataGeneratorSuite` and `HadoopFsRelationTest`.
Closes#28502 from MaxGekk/random-java8-datetime.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR introduces a change to false for the insideComment flag on a newline. Fixing the issue introduced by SPARK-30049.
### Why are the changes needed?
Previously on SPARK-30049 a comment containing an unclosed quote produced the following issue:
```
spark-sql> SELECT 1 -- someone's comment here
> ;
Error in query:
extraneous input ';' expecting <EOF>(line 2, pos 0)
== SQL ==
SELECT 1 -- someone's comment here
;
^^^
```
This was caused because there was no flag for comment sections inside the splitSemiColon method to ignore quotes. SPARK-30049 added that flag and fixed the issue, but introduced the follwoing problem:
```
spark-sql> select
> 1,
> -- two
> 2;
Error in query:
mismatched input '<EOF>' expecting {'(', 'ADD', 'AFTER', 'ALL', 'ALTER', ...}(line 3, pos 2)
== SQL ==
select
1,
--^^^
```
This issue is generated by a missing turn-off for the insideComment flag with a newline.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- For previous tests using line-continuity(`\`) it was added a line-continuity rule in the SqlBase.g4 file to add the functionality to the SQL context.
- A new test for inline comments was added.
Closes#27920 from javierivanov/SPARK-31102.
Authored-by: Javier Fuentes <j.fuentes.m@icloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some alias of expression can not display correctly in schema. This PR will fix them.
- `TimeWindow`
- `MaxBy`
- `MinBy`
- `UnaryMinus`
- `BitwiseCount`
This PR also fix a typo issue, please look at b7cde42b04/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ExpressionsSchemaSuite.scala (L142)
Note:
1. `MaxBy` and `MinBy` extends `MaxMinBy` and the latter add a method `funcName` not needed. We can reuse `prettyName` to replace `funcName`.
2. Spark SQL exists some function no elegant implementation.For example: `BitwiseCount` override the sql method show below:
`override def sql: String = s"bit_count(${child.sql})"`
I don't think it's elegant enough. Because `Expression` gives the following definitions.
```
def sql: String = {
val childrenSQL = children.map(_.sql).mkString(", ")
s"$prettyName($childrenSQL)"
}
```
By this definition, `BitwiseCount` should override `prettyName` method.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve the implement of some expression.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
'Yes'. This PR will let user see the correct alias in schema.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#28164 from beliefer/elegant-pretty-name-for-function.
Lead-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modified `RandomDataGenerator.forType` for DateType and TimestampType to generate special date//timestamp values with 0.5 probability. This will trigger dictionary encoding in Parquet datasource test HadoopFsRelationTest "test all data types". Currently, dictionary encoding is tested only for numeric types like ShortType.
### Why are the changes needed?
To extend test coverage. Currently, probability of testing of dictionary encoding in the test HadoopFsRelationTest "test all data types" for DateType and TimestampType is close to zero because dates/timestamps are uniformly distributed in wide range, and the chance of generating the same values is pretty low. In this way, parquet datasource cannot apply dictionary encoding for such column types.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running `ParquetHadoopFsRelationSuite` and `JsonHadoopFsRelationSuite`.
Closes#28481 from MaxGekk/test-random-parquet-dict-enc.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Shift non-existing dates in Proleptic Gregorian calendar by 1 day. The reason for that is `RowEncoderSuite` generates random dates/timestamps in the hybrid calendar, and some dates/timestamps don't exist in Proleptic Gregorian calendar like 1000-02-29 because 1000 is not leap year in Proleptic Gregorian calendar.
### Why are the changes needed?
This makes RowEncoderSuite much stable.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running RowEncoderSuite and set non-existing date manually:
```scala
val date = new java.sql.Date(1000 - 1900, 1, 29)
Try { date.toLocalDate; date }.getOrElse(new Date(date.getTime + MILLIS_PER_DAY))
```
Closes#28486 from MaxGekk/fix-RowEncoderSuite.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The RuntimeReplaceable ones are runtime replaceable, thus, their original parameters are not going to be resolved to PrettyAttribute and remain debug style string if we directly implement their `sql` methods with their parameters' `sql` methods.
This PR is raised with suggestions by maropu and cloud-fan https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28402/files#r417656589. In this PR, we re-implement the `sql` methods of the RuntimeReplaceable ones with toPettySQL
### Why are the changes needed?
Consistency of schema output between RuntimeReplaceable expressions and normal ones.
For example, `date_format` vs `to_timestamp`, before this PR, they output differently
#### Before
```sql
select date_format(timestamp '2019-10-06', 'yyyy-MM-dd uuuu')
struct<date_format(TIMESTAMP '2019-10-06 00:00:00', yyyy-MM-dd uuuu):string>
select to_timestamp("2019-10-06S10:11:12.12345", "yyyy-MM-dd'S'HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS")
struct<to_timestamp('2019-10-06S10:11:12.12345', 'yyyy-MM-dd\'S\'HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS'):timestamp>
```
#### After
```sql
select date_format(timestamp '2019-10-06', 'yyyy-MM-dd uuuu')
struct<date_format(TIMESTAMP '2019-10-06 00:00:00', yyyy-MM-dd uuuu):string>
select to_timestamp("2019-10-06T10:11:12'12", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss''SSSS")
struct<to_timestamp(2019-10-06T10:11:12'12, yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss''SSSS):timestamp>
````
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the schema output style changed for the runtime replaceable expressions as shown in the above example
### How was this patch tested?
regenerate all related tests
Closes#28420 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31615.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup to address the https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28366#discussion_r420611872 by refining the SQL config document.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make developers less confusing.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Only doc change.
Closes#28468 from viirya/SPARK-31365-followup.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to deprecate 'spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly' configuration and remove it in the future release.
### Why are the changes needed?
This optimization can cause a potential correctness issue, see also SPARK-26709.
Also, it seems difficult to extend the optimization. Basically you should whitelist all available functions. It costs some maintenance overhead, see also SPARK-31590.
Looks we should just better let users use `SparkSessionExtensions` instead if they must use, and remove it in Spark side.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, setting `spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly` will show a deprecation warning:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.unset("spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly")
```
```
20/05/06 12:57:23 WARN SQLConf: The SQL config 'spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly' has been
deprecated in Spark v3.0 and may be removed in the future. Avoid to depend on this optimization
to prevent a potential correctness issue. If you must use, use 'SparkSessionExtensions' instead to
inject it as a custom rule.
```
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly", "true")
```
```
20/05/06 12:57:44 WARN SQLConf: The SQL config 'spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly' has been
deprecated in Spark v3.0 and may be removed in the future. Avoid to depend on this optimization
to prevent a potential correctness issue. If you must use, use 'SparkSessionExtensions' instead to
inject it as a custom rule.
```
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Closes#28459 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31647.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to replace `NESTED_PREDICATE_PUSHDOWN_ENABLED` with `NESTED_PREDICATE_PUSHDOWN_V1_SOURCE_LIST` which can configure which v1 data sources are enabled with nested predicate pushdown.
### Why are the changes needed?
We added nested predicate pushdown feature that is configured by `NESTED_PREDICATE_PUSHDOWN_ENABLED`. However, this config is all or nothing config, and applies on all data sources.
In order to not introduce API breaking change after enabling nested predicate pushdown, we'd like to set nested predicate pushdown per data sources. Please also refer to the comments https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27728#discussion_r410829720.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added/Modified unit tests.
Closes#28366 from viirya/SPARK-31365.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Perform days rebasing while converting days from JSON string field. In Spark 2.4 and earlier versions, the days are interpreted as days since the epoch in the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian since 1582-10-15). Since Spark 3.0, the base calendar was switched to Proleptic Gregorian calendar, so, the days should be rebased to represent the same local date.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix a bug and restore compatibility with Spark 2.4 in which:
```scala
scala> spark.read.schema("d date").json(Seq("{'d': '-141704'}").toDS).show
+----------+
| d|
+----------+
|1582-01-01|
+----------+
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before:
```scala
scala> spark.read.schema("d date").json(Seq("{'d': '-141704'}").toDS).show
+----------+
| d|
+----------+
|1582-01-11|
+----------+
```
After:
```scala
scala> spark.read.schema("d date").json(Seq("{'d': '-141704'}").toDS).show
+----------+
| d|
+----------+
|1582-01-01|
+----------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add a test to `JsonSuite`.
Closes#28453 from MaxGekk/json-rebase-legacy-days.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Skip timestamps rebasing after a global threshold when there is no difference between Julian and Gregorian calendars. This allows to avoid checking hash maps of switch points, and fixes perf regressions in `toJavaTimestamp()` and `fromJavaTimestamp()`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix perf regressions of conversions to/from external type `java.sql.Timestamp`.
Before (see the PR's results https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28440):
```
================================================================================================
Conversion from/to external types
================================================================================================
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 on Linux 4.15.0-1063-aws
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 2.50GHz
To/from Java's date-time: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Timestamp 376 388 10 13.3 75.2 1.1X
Collect java.sql.Timestamp 1878 1937 64 2.7 375.6 0.2X
```
After:
```
================================================================================================
Conversion from/to external types
================================================================================================
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 on Linux 4.15.0-1063-aws
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 2.50GHz
To/from Java's date-time: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Timestamp 249 264 24 20.1 49.8 1.7X
Collect java.sql.Timestamp 1503 1523 24 3.3 300.5 0.3X
```
Perf improvements in average of:
1. From java.sql.Timestamp is ~ 34%
2. To java.sql.Timestamps is ~16%
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `DateTimeUtilsSuite` and `RebaseDateTimeSuite`.
Closes#28441 from MaxGekk/opt-rebase-common-threshold.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit 43a73e387c. It sets `INT96` as the timestamp type while saving timestamps to parquet files.
### Why are the changes needed?
To be compatible with Hive and Presto that don't support the `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` type in current stable releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites.
Closes#28450 from MaxGekk/parquet-int96.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Push the rebase logic to the lower level of the parquet vectorized reader, to make the final code more vectorization-friendly.
### Why are the changes needed?
Parquet vectorized reader is carefully implemented, to make it more likely to be vectorized by the JVM. However, the newly added datetime rebase degrade the performance a lot, as it breaks vectorization, even if the datetime values don't need to rebase (this is very likely as dates before 1582 is rare).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
Run part of the `DateTimeRebaseBenchmark` locally. The results:
before this patch
```
[info] Load dates from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase off 2677 2838 142 37.4 26.8 1.0X
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase on 3828 4331 805 26.1 38.3 0.7X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase off 2903 2926 34 34.4 29.0 0.9X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase on 4163 4197 38 24.0 41.6 0.6X
[info] Load timestamps from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase off 3537 3627 104 28.3 35.4 1.0X
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase on 6891 7010 105 14.5 68.9 0.5X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase off 3692 3770 72 27.1 36.9 1.0X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase on 7588 7610 30 13.2 75.9 0.5X
```
After this patch
```
[info] Load dates from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase off 2758 2944 197 36.3 27.6 1.0X
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase on 2908 2966 51 34.4 29.1 0.9X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase off 2840 2878 37 35.2 28.4 1.0X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase on 3407 3433 24 29.4 34.1 0.8X
[info] Load timestamps from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase off 3861 4003 139 25.9 38.6 1.0X
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase on 4194 4283 77 23.8 41.9 0.9X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase off 3849 3937 79 26.0 38.5 1.0X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase on 7512 7546 55 13.3 75.1 0.5X
```
Date type is 30% faster if the values don't need to rebase, 20% faster if need to rebase.
Timestamp type is 60% faster if the values don't need to rebase, no difference if need to rebase.
Closes#28406 from cloud-fan/perf.
Lead-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The collect_set() aggregate function should produce a set of distinct elements. When the column argument's type is BinayType this is not the case.
Example:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.Window
case class R(id: String, value: String, bytes: Array[Byte])
def makeR(id: String, value: String) = R(id, value, value.getBytes)
val df = Seq(makeR("a", "dog"), makeR("a", "cat"), makeR("a", "cat"), makeR("b", "fish")).toDF()
// In the example below "bytesSet" erroneously has duplicates but "stringSet" does not (as expected).
df.agg(collect_set('value) as "stringSet", collect_set('bytes) as "byteSet").show(truncate=false)
// The same problem is displayed when using window functions.
val win = Window.partitionBy('id).rowsBetween(Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.unboundedFollowing)
val result = df.select(
collect_set('value).over(win) as "stringSet",
collect_set('bytes).over(win) as "bytesSet"
)
.select('stringSet, 'bytesSet, size('stringSet) as "stringSetSize", size('bytesSet) as "bytesSetSize")
.show()
```
We use a HashSet buffer to accumulate the results, the problem is that arrays equality in Scala don't behave as expected, arrays ara just plain java arrays and the equality don't compare the content of the arrays
Array(1, 2, 3) == Array(1, 2, 3) => False
The result is that duplicates are not removed in the hashset
The solution proposed is that in the last stage, when we have all the data in the Hashset buffer, we delete duplicates changing the type of the elements and then transform it to the original type.
This transformation is only applied when we have a BinaryType
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix the bug explained
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now `collect_set()` correctly deduplicates array of byte.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit testing
Closes#28351 from planga82/feature/SPARK-31500_COLLECT_SET_bug.
Authored-by: Pablo Langa <soypab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add test cases covering all interval units: MICROSECOND MILLISECOND SECOND MINUTE HOUR DAY WEEK MONTH YEAR
### Why are the changes needed?
For test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Test only.
Closes#28418 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-28424.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to fix two legacy timestamp formatter `LegacySimpleTimestampFormatter` and `LegacyFastTimestampFormatter` to perform micros rebasing in parsing/formatting from/to strings.
### Why are the changes needed?
Legacy timestamps formatters operate on the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian), so, the input micros should be rebased to have the same date-time fields as in Proleptic Gregorian calendar used by Spark SQL, see SPARK-26651.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests to `TimestampFormatterSuite`
Closes#28408 from MaxGekk/fix-rebasing-in-legacy-timestamp-formatter.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `CTESubstitution`, resolve CTE relations first, then traverse the main plan only once to substitute CTE relations.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently we will traverse the main query many times (if there are many CTE relations), which can be pretty slow if the main query is large.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
local perf test
```
scala> :pa
// Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
def test(i: Int): Unit = 1.to(i).foreach { _ =>
spark.sql("""
with
t1 as (select 1),
t2 as (select 1),
t3 as (select 1),
t4 as (select 1),
t5 as (select 1),
t6 as (select 1),
t7 as (select 1),
t8 as (select 1),
t9 as (select 1)
select * from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9""").queryExecution.assertAnalyzed()
}
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
test: (i: Int)Unit
scala> test(10000)
scala> println(org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.RuleExecutor.dumpTimeSpent)
```
The result before this patch
```
Rule Effective Time / Total Time Effective Runs / Total Runs
CTESubstitution 3328796344 / 3924576425 10000 / 20000
```
The result after this patch
```
Rule Effective Time / Total Time Effective Runs / Total Runs
CTESubstitution 1503085936 / 2091992092 10000 / 20000
```
About 2 times faster.
Closes#28407 from cloud-fan/cte.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Because of ebc8fa50d0 and beec8d535f, the SQL output strings for date/timestamp - interval operation will have a malformed format, such as `struct<dateval:date,dateval + (- INTERVAL '2 years 2 months').....`
This PR restore this behavior by adding one `RuntimeReplaceable `implementation for both of the operations to have their pretty SQL strings back.
### Why are the changes needed?
restore the SQL string for datetime operations
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO, we are restoring here
### How was this patch tested?
added unit tests
Closes#28402 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31586-F.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Check all available legacy formats in the tests added by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28345
- Check dates rebasing in legacy parsers for only one direction either days -> string or string -> days.
### Why are the changes needed?
Round trip tests can hide issues in dates rebasing. For example, if we remove rebasing from legacy parsers (from `parse()` and `format()`) the tests will pass.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running `DateFormatterSuite`.
Closes#28398 from MaxGekk/test-rebasing-in-legacy-date-formatter.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to update `sql` in `Rand`/`Randn` with no argument to make a column name deterministic.
Before this PR (a column name changes run-by-run):
```
scala> sql("select rand()").show()
+-------------------------+
|rand(7986133828002692830)|
+-------------------------+
| 0.9524061403696937|
+-------------------------+
```
After this PR (a column name fixed):
```
scala> sql("select rand()").show()
+------------------+
| rand()|
+------------------+
|0.7137935639522275|
+------------------+
// If a seed given, it is still shown in a column name
// (the same with the current behaviour)
scala> sql("select rand(1)").show()
+------------------+
| rand(1)|
+------------------+
|0.6363787615254752|
+------------------+
// We can still check a seed in explain output:
scala> sql("select rand()").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [rand(-2282124938778456838) AS rand()#0]
+- *(1) Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
Note: This fix comes from #28194; the ongoing PR tests the output schema of expressions, so their schemas must be deterministic for the tests.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make output schema deterministic.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Closes#28392 from maropu/SPARK-31594.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses two things:
- `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` should supports view (a regression introduced by #26921)
- `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` on a temporary view should return empty result (2.4 behavior instead of throwing `AnalysisException`.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's a bug.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` works on views:
```
scala> sql("CREATE VIEW view TBLPROPERTIES('p1'='v1', 'p2'='v2') AS SELECT 1 AS c1")
scala> sql("SHOW TBLPROPERTIES view").show(truncate=false)
+---------------------------------+-------------+
|key |value |
+---------------------------------+-------------+
|view.catalogAndNamespace.numParts|2 |
|view.query.out.col.0 |c1 |
|view.query.out.numCols |1 |
|p2 |v2 |
|view.catalogAndNamespace.part.0 |spark_catalog|
|p1 |v1 |
|view.catalogAndNamespace.part.1 |default |
+---------------------------------+-------------+
```
And for a temporary view:
```
scala> sql("CREATE TEMPORARY VIEW tview TBLPROPERTIES('p1'='v1', 'p2'='v2') AS SELECT 1 AS c1")
scala> sql("SHOW TBLPROPERTIES tview").show(truncate=false)
+---+-----+
|key|value|
+---+-----+
+---+-----+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#28375 from imback82/show_tblproperties_followup.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With suggestion from cloud-fan https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28222#issuecomment-620586933
I Checked with both Presto and PostgresSQL, one is implemented intervals with ANSI style year-month/day-time, and the other is mixed and Non-ANSI. They both add the exceeded days in interval time part to the total days of the operation which extracts day from interval values.
```sql
presto> SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:00' as timestamp)));
_col0
-------
14
(1 row)
Query 20200428_135239_00000_ahn7x, FINISHED, 1 node
Splits: 17 total, 17 done (100.00%)
0:01 [0 rows, 0B] [0 rows/s, 0B/s]
presto> SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:01' as timestamp)));
_col0
-------
13
(1 row)
Query 20200428_135246_00001_ahn7x, FINISHED, 1 node
Splits: 17 total, 17 done (100.00%)
0:00 [0 rows, 0B] [0 rows/s, 0B/s]
presto>
```
```sql
postgres=# SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:00' as timestamp)));
date_part
-----------
14
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:01' as timestamp)));
date_part
-----------
13
```
```
spark-sql> SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:01' as timestamp)));
0
spark-sql> SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:00' as timestamp)));
0
```
In ANSI standard, the day is exact 24 hours, so we don't need to worry about the conceptual day for interval extraction. The meaning of the conceptual day only takes effect when we add it to a zoned timestamp value.
### Why are the changes needed?
Both satisfy the ANSI standard and common use cases in modern SQL platforms
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, it new in 3.0
### How was this patch tested?
add more uts
Closes#28396 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31597.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to simplify the code of `InSet.sql` and create `Literal` instances directly from Catalyst's internal values by using the default `Literal` constructor.
### Why are the changes needed?
This simplifies code and avoids unnecessary conversions to external types.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test `SPARK-31563: sql of InSet for UTF8String collection` in `ColumnExpressionSuite`.
Closes#28399 from MaxGekk/fix-InSet-sql-followup.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The implementation of TimeSub for the operation of timestamp subtracting interval is almost repetitive with TimeAdd. We can replace it with TimeAdd(l, -r) since there are equivalent.
Suggestion from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28310#discussion_r414259239
Besides, the Coercion rules for TimeAdd/TimeSub(date, interval) are useless anymore, so remove them in this PR since they are touched in this PR.
### Why are the changes needed?
remove redundant and useless code for easy maintenance
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, the SQL string of `datetime - interval` become `datetime + (- interval)`
### How was this patch tested?
modified existing unit tests.
Closes#28381 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31586.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a new logical node AggregateWithHaving, and the parser should create this plan for HAVING. The analyzer resolves it to Filter(..., Aggregate(...)).
### Why are the changes needed?
The SQL parser in Spark creates Filter(..., Aggregate(...)) for the HAVING query, and Spark has a special analyzer rule ResolveAggregateFunctions to resolve the aggregate functions and grouping columns in the Filter operator.
It works for simple cases in a very tricky way as it relies on rule execution order:
1. Rule ResolveReferences hits the Aggregate operator and resolves attributes inside aggregate functions, but the function itself is still unresolved as it's an UnresolvedFunction. This stops resolving the Filter operator as the child Aggrege operator is still unresolved.
2. Rule ResolveFunctions resolves UnresolvedFunction. This makes the Aggrege operator resolved.
3. Rule ResolveAggregateFunctions resolves the Filter operator if its child is a resolved Aggregate. This rule can correctly resolve the grouping columns.
In the example query, I put a CAST, which needs to be resolved by rule ResolveTimeZone, which runs after ResolveAggregateFunctions. This breaks step 3 as the Aggregate operator is unresolved at that time. Then the analyzer starts next round and the Filter operator is resolved by ResolveReferences, which wrongly resolves the grouping columns.
See the demo below:
```
SELECT SUM(a) AS b, '2020-01-01' AS fake FROM VALUES (1, 10), (2, 20) AS T(a, b) GROUP BY b HAVING b > 10
```
The query's result is
```
+---+----------+
| b| fake|
+---+----------+
| 2|2020-01-01|
+---+----------+
```
But if we add CAST, it will return an empty result.
```
SELECT SUM(a) AS b, CAST('2020-01-01' AS DATE) AS fake FROM VALUES (1, 10), (2, 20) AS T(a, b) GROUP BY b HAVING b > 10
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, bug fix for cast in having aggregate expressions.
### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.
Closes#28294 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-31519.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28318, to make the code more readable, by adding some comments to explain the trick and simplify the code to use a boolean flag instead of 2 string sets.
This PR also fixes various problems:
1. the name check should consider case sensitivity
2. forward name conflicts like `with t as (with t2 as ...), t2 as ...` is not a real conflict and we shouldn't fail.
### Why are the changes needed?
correct the behavior
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, fix the fore-mentioned behaviors.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#28371 from cloud-fan/followup.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove all the extra whitespaces in the formatted explain.
### Why are the changes needed?
The number of extra whitespaces of the formatted explain becomes different between master and branch-3.0. This causes a problem that whenever we backport formatted explain related tests from master to branch-3.0, it will fail branch-3.0. Besides, extra whitespaces are always disallowed in Spark. Thus, we should remove them as possible as we can.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, formatted explain is newly added in Spark 3.0.
### How was this patch tested?
Updated sql query tests.
Closes#28315 from Ngone51/fix_extra_spaces.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To follow ANSI，the expressions - `date + interval`, `interval + date` and `date - interval` should only accept intervals which the `microseconds` part is 0.
### Why are the changes needed?
Better ANSI compliance
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, this PR should target 3.0.0 in which this feature is newly added.
### How was this patch tested?
add more unit tests
Closes#28310 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31527.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR modifies LegacyDateFormatter#parse to return proleptic Gregorian days rather than hybrid Julian days.
### Why are the changes needed?
The legacy time parser currently returns epoch days in the hybrid Julian calendar. However, the callers to the legacy parser (e.g., UnivocityParser, JacksonParser) expect epoch days in the proleptic Gregorian calendar. As a result, pre-Gregorian dates like '1000-01-01' get interpreted as '1000-01-06'.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manual testing and modified existing unit tests.
Closes#28345 from bersprockets/SPARK-31557.
Authored-by: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes a CTE substitution issue so as to the following SQL return the correct empty result:
```
WITH t(c) AS (SELECT 1)
SELECT * FROM t
WHERE c IN (
WITH t(c) AS (SELECT 2)
SELECT * FROM t
)
```
Before this PR the result was `1`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a correctness issue.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, fixes a correctness issue.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new test case.
Closes#28318 from peter-toth/SPARK-31535-fix-nested-cte-substitution.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to fix the `InSet.sql` method for the cases when input collection contains values of internal Catalyst's types, for instance `UTF8String`. Elements of the input set `hset` are converted to Scala types, and wrapped by `Literal` to properly form SQL view of the input collection.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fixed the bug in `InSet.sql` that makes wrong assumption about types of collection elements. See more details in SPARK-31563.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Highly likely, not.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `ColumnExpressionSuite`
Closes#28343 from MaxGekk/fix-InSet-sql.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
the 2 method `arrayClassFor` and `dataTypeFor` in `ScalaReflection` call each other circularly, the cases in `dataTypeFor` are not fully handled in `arrayClassFor`
For example:
```scala
scala> implicit def newArrayEncoder[T <: Array[_] : TypeTag]: Encoder[T] = ExpressionEncoder()
newArrayEncoder: [T <: Array[_]](implicit evidence$1: reflect.runtime.universe.TypeTag[T])org.apache.spark.sql.Encoder[T]
scala> val decOne = Decimal(1, 38, 18)
decOne: org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal = 1E-18
scala> val decTwo = Decimal(2, 38, 18)
decTwo: org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal = 2E-18
scala> val decSpark = Array(decOne, decTwo)
decSpark: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal] = Array(1E-18, 2E-18)
scala> Seq(decSpark).toDF()
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.sql.types.DecimalType cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.types.ObjectType
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.$anonfun$arrayClassFor$1(ScalaReflection.scala:131)
at scala.reflect.internal.tpe.TypeConstraints$UndoLog.undo(TypeConstraints.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:879)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects$(ScalaReflection.scala:878)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.arrayClassFor(ScalaReflection.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.$anonfun$dataTypeFor$1(ScalaReflection.scala:105)
at scala.reflect.internal.tpe.TypeConstraints$UndoLog.undo(TypeConstraints.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:879)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects$(ScalaReflection.scala:878)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.dataTypeFor(ScalaReflection.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.$anonfun$serializerForType$1(ScalaReflection.scala:399)
at scala.reflect.internal.tpe.TypeConstraints$UndoLog.undo(TypeConstraints.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:879)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects$(ScalaReflection.scala:878)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.serializerForType(ScalaReflection.scala:393)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.ExpressionEncoder$.apply(ExpressionEncoder.scala:57)
at newArrayEncoder(<console>:57)
... 53 elided
scala>
```
In this PR, we add the missing cases to `arrayClassFor`
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix as described above
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
add a test for array encoders
Closes#28324 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31552.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`LIKE ANY/SOME` and `LIKE ALL` operators are mostly used when we are matching a text field with numbers of patterns. For example:
Teradata / Hive 3.0 / Snowflake:
```sql
--like any
select 'foo' LIKE ANY ('%foo%','%bar%');
--like all
select 'foo' LIKE ALL ('%foo%','%bar%');
```
PostgreSQL:
```sql
-- like any
select 'foo' LIKE ANY (array['%foo%','%bar%']);
-- like all
select 'foo' LIKE ALL (array['%foo%','%bar%']);
```
This PR add support these two operators.
More details:
https://docs.teradata.com/reader/756LNiPSFdY~4JcCCcR5Cw/4~AyrPNmDN0Xk4SALLo6aQhttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15229https://docs.snowflake.net/manuals/sql-reference/functions/like_any.html
### Why are the changes needed?
To smoothly migrate SQLs to Spark SQL.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#27477 from wangyum/SPARK-30724.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Modified `ParquetFilters.valueCanMakeFilterOn()` to accept filters with `java.time.LocalDate` attributes.
2. Modified `ParquetFilters.dateToDays()` to support both types `java.sql.Date` and `java.time.LocalDate` in conversions to days.
3. Add implicit conversion from `LocalDate` to `Expression` (`Literal`).
### Why are the changes needed?
To support pushed down filters with `java.time.LocalDate` attributes. Before the changes, date filters are not pushed down to Parquet datasource when `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled` is `true`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `ParquetFilterSuite`
Closes#28259 from MaxGekk/parquet-filter-java8-date-time.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to add a new test suite for `ExpressionInfo`. Major changes are as follows;
- Added a new test suite named `ExpressionInfoSuite`
- To improve test coverage, added a test for error handling in `ExpressionInfoSuite`
- Moved the `ExpressionInfo`-related tests from `UDFSuite` to `ExpressionInfoSuite`
- Moved the related tests from `SQLQuerySuite` to `ExpressionInfoSuite`
- Added a comment in `ExpressionInfoSuite` (followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28224)
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test suites/coverage.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#28308 from maropu/SPARK-31526.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Override the canonicalized fields with respect to the result of `needsTimeZone`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The current approach breaks sematic equal of two cast expressions that don't relate with datetime type. If we don't need to use `timeZone` information casting `from` type to `to` type, then the timeZoneId should not influence the canonicalize result.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.
Closes#28288 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-31515.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
\_FUNC\_ is used in note() of `ExpressionDescription` since https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28248, it can be more cases later, we should replace it with function name for documentation
### Why are the changes needed?
doc fix
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
pass Jenkins, and verify locally with Jekyll serve
Closes#28305 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31474-F.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Document row field values of `DATE` and `TIMESTAMP` type returned by `Row.get()` and `Row.apply`.
- Refer to `Row.get()` from the description of filter values
### Why are the changes needed?
Reflect current behaviour of Row's method `apply()` and `get()` in comments to inform users about different return types that are depended on the SQL config settings `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Run `$ ./dev/scalastyle`
Closes#28300 from MaxGekk/doc-filter-date-time.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Extracting millennium, century, decade, millisecond, microsecond and epoch from datetime is neither ANSI standard nor quite common in modern SQL platforms. Most of the systems listing below does not support these except PostgreSQL and redshift.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+UDFhttps://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/functions050.htmhttps://prestodb.io/docs/current/functions/datetime.htmlhttps://docs.cloudera.com/documentation/enterprise/5-8-x/topics/impala_datetime_functions.htmlhttps://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/functions-date-time.html#label-supported-date-time-partshttps://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/functions-datetime.html#FUNCTIONS-DATETIME-EXTRACT
This PR removes these extract fields support from extract function for date and timestamp values
`isoyear` is PostgreSQL specific but `yearofweek` is more commonly used across platforms
`isodow` is PostgreSQL specific but `iso` as a suffix is more commonly used across platforms so, `dow_iso` and `dayofweek_iso` is used to replace it.
For historical reasons, we have [`dayofweek`, `dow`] implemented for representing a non-ISO day-of-week and a newly added `isodow` from PostgreSQL for ISO day-of-week. Many other systems only have one week-numbering system support and use either full names or abbreviations. Things in spark become a little bit complicated.
1. because of the existence of `isodow`, so we need to add iso-prefix to `dayofweek` to make a pair for it too. [`dayofweek`, `isodayofweek`, `dow` and `isodow`]
2. because there are rare `iso`-prefixed systems and more systems choose `iso`-suffixed way, so we may result in [`dayofweek`, `dayofweekiso`, `dow`, `dowiso`]
3. `dayofweekiso` looks nice and has use cases in the platforms listed above, e.g. snowflake, but `dowiso` looks weird and no use cases found.
4. with a discussion the community，we have agreed with an underscore before `iso` may look much better because `isodow` is new and there is no standard for `iso` kind of things, so this may be good for us to make it simple and clear for end-users if they are well documented too.
Thus, we finally result in [`dayofweek`, `dow`] for Non-ISO day-of-week system and [`dayofweek_iso`, `dow_iso`] for ISO system
### Why are the changes needed?
Remove some nonstandard and uncommon features as we can add them back if necessary
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO, we should target this to 3.0.0 and these are added during 3.0.0
### How was this patch tested?
Remove unused tests
Closes#28284 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31507.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
override the `sql` method of `StringTrim`, `StringTrimLeft` and `StringTrimRight`, to use the standard SQL syntax.
### Why are the changes needed?
The current implementation is wrong. It gives you a SQL string that returns different result.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#28281 from cloud-fan/sql.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT extract(dayofweek from '2009-07-26');
1
spark-sql> SELECT extract(dow from '2009-07-26');
0
spark-sql> SELECT extract(isodow from '2009-07-26');
7
spark-sql> SELECT dayofweek('2009-07-26');
1
spark-sql> SELECT weekday('2009-07-26');
6
```
Currently, there are 4 types of day-of-week range:
1. the function `dayofweek`(2.3.0) and extracting `dayofweek`(2.4.0) result as of Sunday(1) to Saturday(7)
2. extracting `dow`(3.0.0) results as of Sunday(0) to Saturday(6)
3. extracting` isodow` (3.0.0) results as of Monday(1) to Sunday(7)
4. the function `weekday`(2.4.0) results as of Monday(0) to Sunday(6)
Actually, extracting `dayofweek` and `dow` are both derived from PostgreSQL but have different meanings.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23903https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28623
In this PR, we make extracting `dow` as same as extracting `dayofweek` and the `dayofweek` function for historical reason and not breaking anything.
Also, add more documentation to the extracting function to make extract field more clear to understand.
### Why are the changes needed?
Consistency insurance
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, doc updated and extract `dow` is as same as `dayofweek`
### How was this patch tested?
1. modified ut
2. local SQL doc verification
#### before
#### after
Closes#28248 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31474.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR skips creating the partition specs in `ShufflePartitionsUtil` for 0-size partitions, which avoids launching unnecessary tasks that do nothing.
### Why are the changes needed?
launching tasks that do nothing is a waste.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
updated tests
Closes#28226 from cloud-fan/aqe.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is the follow-up PR of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28003
- add a migration guide
- add an end-to-end test case.
### Why are the changes needed?
The original PR made the major behavior change in the user-facing RESET command.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added a new end-to-end test
Closes#28265 from gatorsmile/spark-31234followup.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Generate rebasing arrays for micros up to 2037 in `RebaseDateTimeSuite.generateRebaseJson()`.
2. Exclude 4 time zones from the black list in `generateRebaseJson()`.
3. Re-generate JSON files with rebasing info - `gregorian-julian-rebase-micros.json` and `julian-gregorian-rebase-micros.json`.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. `sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo` resolves DST after 2037 year incorrectly. See aa318070b2/jdk/src/share/classes/sun/util/calendar/ZoneInfo.java (L55-L62) . By restricting the rebase arrays to 2037 year, we follow the behaviour of `ZoneInfo` which uses DST of 2037 for all years beyond 2037.
2. To enable optimization of micros rebasing via switch arrays for the time zones:
- Asia/Tehran
- Iran
- Africa/Casablanca
- Africa/El_Aaiun
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `RebaseDateTimeUtils`, `DateTimeUtilsSuite` and `DateFunctionsSuite`.
Closes#28253 from MaxGekk/fix-4-time-zones-rebasing.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to add an ExpressionInfo entry for EXTRACT for better documentations.
This PR comes from the comment in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479#discussion_r409900080
### Why are the changes needed?
To make SQL documentations complete.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, this PR updates the `Spark SQL, Built-in Functions` page.
### How was this patch tested?
Run the example tests.
Closes#28251 from maropu/AddExtractExpr.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to dump the codegen and compilation time for benchmark query tests.
### Why are the changes needed?
Measure the codegen and compilation time costs in TPC-DS queries
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manual test in my local laptop:
```
23:13:12.845 WARN org.apache.spark.sql.TPCDSQuerySuite:
=== Metrics of Whole-stage Codegen ===
Total code generation time: 21.275102261 seconds
Total compilation time: 12.223771828 seconds
```
Closes#28252 from gatorsmile/testMastercode.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to fix a bug that occurs when comparing null types to decimal types in master/branch-3.0;
```
scala> Seq(BigDecimal(10)).toDF("v1").selectExpr("v1 = NULL").explain(true)
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '(`v1` = NULL)' due to data type mismatch: differing types in '(`v1` = NULL)' (decimal(38,18) and null).; line 1 pos 0;
'Project [(v1#5 = null) AS (v1 = NULL)#7]
+- Project [value#2 AS v1#5]
+- LocalRelation [value#2]
...
```
The query above passed in v2.4.5.
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#28241 from maropu/SPARK-31468.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we can extract `millennium/century/decade/year/quarter/month/week/day/hour/minute/second(with fractions)//millisecond/microseconds` and `epoch` from interval values
While getting the `millennium/century/decade/year`, it means how many the interval `months` part can be converted to that unit-value. The content of `millennium/century/decade` will overlap `year` and each other.
While getting `month/day` and so on, it means the integral remainder of the previous unit. Here all the units including `year` are individual.
So while extracting `year`, `month`, `day`, `hour`, `minute`, `second`, which are ANSI primary datetime units, the semantic is `extracting`, but others might refer to `transforming`.
While getting epoch we have treat month as 30 days which varies the natural Calendar rules we use.
To avoid ambiguity, I suggest we should only support those extract field defined ANSI with their abbreviations.
### Why are the changes needed?
Extracting `millennium`, `century` etc does not obey the meaning of extracting, and they are not so useful and worth maintaining.
The `extract` is ANSI standard expression and `date_part` is its pg-specific alias function. The current support extract-fields are fully bought from PostgreSQL.
With a look at other systems like Presto/Hive, they don't support those ambiguous fields too.
e.g. Hive 2.2.x also take it from PostgreSQL but without introducing those ambiguous fields https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12828349/HIVE-14579
e.g. presto
```sql
presto> select extract(quater from interval '10-0' year to month);
Query 20200417_094723_00020_m8xq4 failed: line 1:8: Invalid EXTRACT field: quater
select extract(quater from interval '10-0' year to month)
presto> select extract(decade from interval '10-0' year to month);
Query 20200417_094737_00021_m8xq4 failed: line 1:8: Invalid EXTRACT field: decade
select extract(decade from interval '10-0' year to month)
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, as we already have previews versions, this PR will remove support for extracting `millennium/century/decade/quarter/week/millisecond/microseconds` and `epoch` from intervals with `date_part` function
### How was this patch tested?
rm some used tests
Closes#28242 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31469.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I checked all the config of Spark again. find some new commit not add version information.
**Test.scala**
Item name | Since version | JIRA ID | Commit ID | Note
-- | -- | -- | -- | --
spark.testing.skipValidateCores | 3.1.0 | SPARK-29154 | 474b1bb5c2bce2f83c4dd8e19b9b7c5b3aebd6c4#diff-8b4ea8f3b0cc1e7ce7e943de1abbb165 |
**SQL**
Item name | Since version | JIRA ID | Commit ID | Note
-- | -- | -- | -- | --
spark.sql.legacy.integerGroupingId | 3.1.0 | SPARK-30279 | 71c73d58f6e88d2558ed2e696897767d93bac60f#diff-9a6b543db706f1a90f790783d6930a13 |
The two config only exists in branch master.
### Why are the changes needed?
Supplement version information.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#28233 from beliefer/sql-conf-version-legacy-integerGroupingId.
Authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make `UnsafeKVExternalSorter` / `VariableLengthRowBasedKeyValueBatch ` also respect `UnsafeAlignedOffset` when reading the record and update some out of date comemnts.
### Why are the changes needed?
Since `BytesToBytesMap` respects `UnsafeAlignedOffset` when writing the record, `UnsafeKVExternalSorter` should also respect `UnsafeAlignedOffset` when reading the record from `BytesToBytesMap` otherwise it will causes data correctness issue.
Unlike `UnsafeKVExternalSorter` may reading records from `BytesToBytesMap`, `VariableLengthRowBasedKeyValueBatch` writes and reads records by itself. Thus, similar to #22053 and [comment](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22053#issuecomment-411975239) there, fix for `VariableLengthRowBasedKeyValueBatch` more likely an improvement for the support of SPARC platform.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested `HashAggregationQueryWithControlledFallbackSuite` with `UAO_SIZE=8` to simulate SPARC platform. And tests only pass with this fix.
Closes#28195 from Ngone51/fix_uao.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR moves the `ExpressionEncoder.toRow` and `ExpressionEncoder.fromRow` functions into their own function objects(`ExpressionEncoder.Serializer` & `ExpressionEncoder.Deserializer`). This effectively makes the `ExpressionEncoder` stateless, thread-safe and (more) reusable. The function objects are not thread safe, however they are documented as such and should be used in a more limited scope (making it easier to reason about thread safety).
### Why are the changes needed?
ExpressionEncoders are not thread-safe. We had various (nasty) bugs because of this.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#28223 from hvanhovell/SPARK-31450.
Authored-by: herman <herman@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-21870 (cb0cddf#diff-06dc5de6163687b7810aa76e7e152a76R146-R149) caused significant performance regression in cases where the source code size is fairly large as `HashAggregateExec` uses `Block.length` to decide on splitting the code. The change in `length` makes sense as the comment and extra new lines shouldn't be taken into account when deciding on splitting, but the regular expression based approach is very slow and adds a big relative overhead to cases where the execution is quick (small number of rows).
This PR:
- restores `Block.length` to its original form
- places comments in `HashAggragateExec` with `CodegenContext.registerComment` so as to appear only when comments are enabled (`spark.sql.codegen.comments=true`)
Before this PR:
```
deeply nested struct field r/w: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
250 deep x 400 rows (read in-mem) 1137 1143 8 0.1 11368.3 0.0X
```
After this PR:
```
deeply nested struct field r/w: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
250 deep x 400 rows (read in-mem) 167 180 7 0.6 1674.3 0.1X
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix performance regression.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Closes#28083 from peter-toth/SPARK-30564-use-comment-placeholders.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to change rebasing of not-existed timestamps in the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian since 1582-10-15) in the range [1582-10-05, 1582-10-15). Not existed timestamps from the range are shifted to the first valid date in the hybrid calendar - 1582-10-15. The changes affect only `rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros()` because reverse rebasing from the hybrid timestamps to Proleptic Gregorian timestamps does not have such problem.
The shifting affects only the date part of timestamps while keeping the time part as is. For example:
```
1582-10-10 00:11:22.334455 -> 1582-10-15 00:11:22.334455
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, not-existed timestamps are shifted by standard difference between Julian and Gregorian calendar on 1582-10-04, for example 1582-10-14 00:00:00 -> 1582-10-24 00:00:00. That contradicts to shifting of not existed dates in other cases, for example:
```
scala> sql("select timestamp'1990-9-31 12:12:12'").show
+----------------------------------+
|TIMESTAMP('1990-10-01 12:12:12.0')|
+----------------------------------+
| 1990-10-01 12:12:12|
+----------------------------------+
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, this impacts on conversion of Spark SQL `TIMESTAMP` values to external timestamps based on non-Proleptic Gregorian calendar. For example, while saving the 1582-10-14 12:13:14 date to ORC files, it will be shifted to the next valid date 1582-10-15 12:13:14.
### How was this patch tested?
- Added tests to `RebaseDateTimeSuite` and to `OrcSourceSuite`
- By existing test suites `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuite`, `CollectionExpressionsSuite`, `ParquetIOSuite`.
Closes#28227 from MaxGekk/fix-not-exist-timestamps.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to change rebasing of not-existed dates in the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian since 1582-10-15) in the range (1582-10-04, 1582-10-15). Not existed dates from the range are shifted to the first valid date in the hybrid calendar - 1582-10-15. The changes affect only `rebaseGregorianToJulianDays()` because reverse rebasing from the hybrid dates to Proleptic Gregorian dates does not have such problem.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, not-existed dates are shifted by standard difference between Julian and Gregorian calendar on 1582-10-04, for example 1582-10-14 -> 1582-10-24. That's contradict to shifting not existed dates in other cases, for example:
```
scala> sql("select date'1990-9-31'").show
+-----------------+
|DATE '1990-10-01'|
+-----------------+
| 1990-10-01|
+-----------------+
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, this impacts on conversion of Spark SQL `DATE` values to external dates based on non-Proleptic Gregorian calendar. For example, while saving the 1582-10-14 date to ORC files, it will be shifted to the next valid date 1582-10-15.
### How was this patch tested?
- Added tests to `RebaseDateTimeSuite` and to `OrcSourceSuite`
- By existing test suites `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuite`, `CollectionExpressionsSuite`, `ParquetIOSuite`.
Closes#28225 from MaxGekk/fix-not-exist-dates.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Optimise the `toJavaDate()` method of `DateTimeUtils` by:
1. Re-using `rebaseGregorianToJulianDays` optimised by #28067
2. Creating `java.sql.Date` instances from milliseconds in UTC since the epoch instead of date-time fields. This allows to avoid "normalization" inside of `java.sql.Date`.
Also new benchmark for collecting dates is added to `DateTimeBenchmark`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix the performance regression of collecting `DATE` values comparing to Spark 2.4 (see `DateTimeBenchmark` in https://github.com/MaxGekk/spark/pull/27):
Spark 2.4.6-SNAPSHOT:
```
To/from Java's date-time: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Date 559 603 38 8.9 111.8 1.0X
Collect dates 2306 3221 1558 2.2 461.1 0.2X
```
Before the changes:
```
To/from Java's date-time: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Date 1052 1130 73 4.8 210.3 1.0X
Collect dates 3251 4943 1624 1.5 650.2 0.3X
```
After:
```
To/from Java's date-time: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Date 416 419 3 12.0 83.2 1.0X
Collect dates 1928 2759 1180 2.6 385.6 0.2X
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- By existing tests suites, in particular, `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `RebaseDateTimeSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuite`.
- Re-run `DateTimeBenchmark` in the environment:
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) |
| Java | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_242 and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.6+10 |
Closes#28212 from MaxGekk/optimize-toJavaDate.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to re-use optimized implementation of days rebase function `rebaseJulianToGregorianDays()` introduced by the PR #28067 in conversion of `java.sql.Date` values to Catalyst's `DATE` values. The function `fromJavaDate` in `DateTimeUtils` was re-written by taking the implementation from Spark 2.4, and by rebasing the final results via `rebaseJulianToGregorianDays()`.
Also I updated `DateTimeBenchmark`, and added a benchmark for conversion from `java.sql.Date`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The PR fixes the regression of parallelizing a collection of `java.sql.Date` values, and improves performance of converting external values to Catalyst's `DATE` values:
- x4 on the master branch
- 30% against Spark 2.4.6-SNAPSHOT
Spark 2.4.6-SNAPSHOT:
```
To/from java.sql.Timestamp: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Date 614 655 43 8.1 122.8 1.0X
```
Before the changes:
```
To/from java.sql.Timestamp: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Date 1154 1206 46 4.3 230.9 1.0X
```
After:
```
To/from java.sql.Timestamp: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Date 427 434 7 11.7 85.3 1.0X
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- By existing tests suites, in particular, `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `RebaseDateTimeSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuite`.
- Re-run `DateTimeBenchmark` in the environment:
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) |
| Java | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_242 and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.6+10 |
Closes#28205 from MaxGekk/optimize-fromJavaDate.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refine the code comments of days rebasing, to be consistent with the micros rebasing. i.e. one method is the actual implementation and the other variant is the optimized version.
### Why are the changes needed?
improve code comments
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#28199 from cloud-fan/comment.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reuse the `rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros()` and `rebaseJulianToGregorianMicros()` functions introduced by the PR #28119 in `DateTimeUtils`.`toJavaTimestamp()` and `fromJavaTimestamp()`. Actually, new implementation is derived from Spark 2.4 + rebasing via pre-calculated rebasing maps.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes speed up conversions to/from java.sql.Timestamp, and as a consequence the PR improve performance of ORC datasource in loading/saving timestamps:
- Saving ~ **x2.8 faster** in master, and -11% against Spark 2.4.6
- Loading - **x3.2-4.5 faster** in master, -5% against Spark 2.4.6
Before:
```
Save timestamps to ORC: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
after 1582 59877 59877 0 1.7 598.8 0.0X
before 1582 61361 61361 0 1.6 613.6 0.0X
Load timestamps from ORC: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
after 1582, vec off 48197 48288 118 2.1 482.0 1.0X
after 1582, vec on 38247 38351 128 2.6 382.5 1.3X
before 1582, vec off 53179 53359 249 1.9 531.8 0.9X
before 1582, vec on 44076 44268 269 2.3 440.8 1.1X
```
After:
```
Save timestamps to ORC: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
after 1582 21250 21250 0 4.7 212.5 0.1X
before 1582 22105 22105 0 4.5 221.0 0.1X
Load timestamps from ORC: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
after 1582, vec off 14903 14933 40 6.7 149.0 1.0X
after 1582, vec on 8342 8426 73 12.0 83.4 1.8X
before 1582, vec off 15528 15575 76 6.4 155.3 1.0X
before 1582, vec on 9025 9075 61 11.1 90.2 1.7X
```
Spark 2.4.6-SNAPSHOT:
```
Save timestamps to ORC: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
after 1582 18858 18858 0 5.3 188.6 1.0X
before 1582 18508 18508 0 5.4 185.1 1.0X
Load timestamps from ORC: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
after 1582, vec off 14063 14177 143 7.1 140.6 1.0X
after 1582, vec on 5955 6029 100 16.8 59.5 2.4X
before 1582, vec off 14119 14126 7 7.1 141.2 1.0X
before 1582, vec on 5991 6007 25 16.7 59.9 2.3X
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, the `to_utc_timestamp` function returns the later local timestamp in the case of overlapping local timestamps at daylight saving time. it's changed back to the 2.4 behavior.
### How was this patch tested?
- By existing test suite `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `RebaseDateTimeSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuites`, `ParquetIOSuite`, `OrcHadoopFsRelationSuite`.
- Re-generating results of the benchmarks `DateTimeBenchmark` and `DateTimeRebaseBenchmark` in the environment:
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) |
| Java | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_242 and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.6+10 |
Closes#28189 from MaxGekk/optimize-to-from-java-timestamp.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to fallback to rebasing via local dates/timestamps for days/micros of before common era (BCE).
### Why are the changes needed?
It fixes the bug of rebasing dates/timestamps of BCE.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
- By existing tests in `RebaseDateTimeSuite` and `DateTimeUtilsSuite`
- Added tests for negative years to `RebaseDateTimeSuite`
Closes#28172 from MaxGekk/fix-era-in-date-micros-rebasing.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With benchmark original, where the timestamp values are valid to the new parser
the result is
```scala
[info] Running benchmark: Read dates and timestamps
[info] Running case: timestamp strings
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 5781 ms
[info] Running case: parse timestamps from Dataset[String]
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 44764 ms
[info] Running case: infer timestamps from Dataset[String]
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 93764 ms
[info] Running case: from_json(timestamp)
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 59021 ms
```
When we modify the benchmark to
```scala
def timestampStr: Dataset[String] = {
spark.range(0, rowsNum, 1, 1).mapPartitions { iter =>
iter.map(i => s"""{"timestamp":"1970-01-01T01:02:03.${i % 100}"}""")
}.select($"value".as("timestamp")).as[String]
}
readBench.addCase("timestamp strings", numIters) { _ =>
timestampStr.noop()
}
readBench.addCase("parse timestamps from Dataset[String]", numIters) { _ =>
spark.read.schema(tsSchema).json(timestampStr).noop()
}
readBench.addCase("infer timestamps from Dataset[String]", numIters) { _ =>
spark.read.json(timestampStr).noop()
}
```
where the timestamp values are invalid for the new parser which causes a fallback to legacy parser(2.4).
the result is
```scala
[info] Running benchmark: Read dates and timestamps
[info] Running case: timestamp strings
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 5623 ms
[info] Running case: parse timestamps from Dataset[String]
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 506637 ms
[info] Running case: infer timestamps from Dataset[String]
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 509076 ms
```
About 10x perf-regression
BUT if we modify the timestamp pattern to `....HH:mm:ss[.SSS][XXX]` which make all timestamp values valid for the new parser to prohibit fallback, the result is
```scala
[info] Running benchmark: Read dates and timestamps
[info] Running case: timestamp strings
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 5623 ms
[info] Running case: parse timestamps from Dataset[String]
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 506637 ms
[info] Running case: infer timestamps from Dataset[String]
[info] Stopped after 3 iterations, 509076 ms
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix performance regression.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
new tests added.
Closes#28181 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31414.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Check more strictly that a field name can be used as a valid Java identifier in `ScalaReflection.serializerFor`
To check that, `SourceVersion` is used so that we need not add reserved keywords to be checked manually for the future Java versions (e.g, underscore, var, yield), .
### Why are the changes needed?
In the current implementation, `enum` is not checked even though it's a reserved keyword.
Also, there are lots of characters and sequences of character including numeric literals but they are not checked.
So we can't get better error message with following code.
```
case class Data(`0`: Int)
Seq(Data(1)).toDF.show
20/04/11 03:24:24 ERROR CodeGenerator: failed to compile: org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 43, Column 1: Expression "value_0 = value_3" is not a type
org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line 43, Column 1: Expression "value_0 = value_3" is not a type
...
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. With this change and the code example above, we can get following error message.
```
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: `0` is not a valid identifier of Java and cannot be used as field name
- root class: "Data"
...
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add another assertion to existing test case.
Closes#28184 from sarutak/improve-identifier-check.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently NOT IN subqueries (predicated null aware subquery) are not allowed inside OR expressions. We currently catch this condition in checkAnalysis and throw an error.
This PR enhances the subquery rewrite to support this type of queries.
Query
```SQL
SELECT * FROM s1 WHERE a > 5 or b NOT IN (SELECT c FROM s2);
```
Optimized Plan
```SQL
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [a#3, b#4]
+- Filter ((a#3 > 5) || NOT exists#7)
+- Join ExistenceJoin(exists#7), ((b#4 = c#5) || isnull((b#4 = c#5)))
:- HiveTableRelation `default`.`s1`, org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.lazy.LazySimpleSerDe, [a#3, b#4]
+- Project [c#5]
+- HiveTableRelation `default`.`s2`, org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.lazy.LazySimpleSerDe, [c#5, d#6]
```
This is rework from #22141.
The original author of this PR is dilipbiswal.
Closes#22141
### Why are the changes needed?
For better usability.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests in SQLQueryTestSuite, RewriteSubquerySuite and SubquerySuite.
Output from DB2 as a reference:
[nested-not-db2.txt](https://github.com/apache/spark/files/2299945/nested-not-db2.txt)
Closes#28158 from maropu/pr22141.
Lead-authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dkbiswal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since 3.0.0, we make CalendarInterval public for input, it's better for it to be inferred to CalendarIntervalType.
In the PR, we add a rule for CalendarInterval to be mapped to CalendarIntervalType in ScalaRelection, then records(e.g case class, tuples ...) contains interval fields are able to convert to a Dataframe.
### Why are the changes needed?
CalendarInterval is public but can not be used as input for Datafame.
```scala
scala> import org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.CalendarInterval
import org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.CalendarInterval
scala> Seq((1, new CalendarInterval(1, 2, 3))).toDF("a", "b")
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Schema for type org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.CalendarInterval is not supported
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.$anonfun$schemaFor$1(ScalaReflection.scala:735)
```
this should be supported as well as
```scala
scala> sql("select interval 2 month 1 day a")
res2: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [a: interval]
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, records(e.g case class, tuples ...) contains interval fields are able to convert to a Dataframe
### How was this patch tested?
add uts
Closes#28165 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31392.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
improve the code comment and make them consistent between `rebaseJulianToGregorian*` and `rebaseGregorianToJulian*`
### Why are the changes needed?
improve readability.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#28166 from cloud-fan/comment.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to optimise the `DateTimeUtils`.`rebaseJulianToGregorianMicros()` and `rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros()` functions, and make them faster by using pre-calculated rebasing tables. This approach allows to avoid expensive conversions via local timestamps. For example, the `America/Los_Angeles` time zone has just a few time points when difference between Proleptic Gregorian calendar and the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian since 1582-10-15) is changed in the time interval 0001-01-01 .. 2100-01-01:
| i | local timestamp | Proleptic Greg. seconds | Hybrid (Julian+Greg) seconds | difference in minutes|
| -- | ------- |----|----| ---- |
|0|0001-01-01 00:00|-62135568422|-62135740800|-2872|
|1|0100-03-01 00:00|-59006333222|-59006419200|-1432|
|...|...|...|...|...|
|13|1582-10-15 00:00|-12219264422|-12219264000|7|
|14|1883-11-18 12:00|-2717640000|-2717640000|0|
The difference in microseconds between Proleptic and hybrid calendars for any local timestamp in time intervals `[local timestamp(i), local timestamp(i+1))`, and for any microseconds in the time interval `[Gregorian micros(i), Gregorian micros(i+1))` is the same. In this way, we can rebase an input micros by following the steps:
1. Look at the table, and find the time interval where the micros falls to
2. Take the difference between 2 calendars for this time interval
3. Add the difference to the input micros. The result is rebased microseconds that has the same local timestamp representation.
Here are details of the implementation:
- Pre-calculated tables are stored to JSON files `gregorian-julian-rebase-micros.json` and `julian-gregorian-rebase-micros.json` in the resource folder of `sql/catalyst`. The diffs and switch time points are stored as seconds, for example:
```json
[
{
"tz" : "America/Los_Angeles",
"switches" : [ -62135740800, -59006419200, ... , -2717640000 ],
"diffs" : [ 172378, 85978, ..., 0 ]
}
]
```
The JSON files are generated by 2 tests in `RebaseDateTimeSuite` - `generate 'gregorian-julian-rebase-micros.json'` and `generate 'julian-gregorian-rebase-micros.json'`. Both tests are disabled by default.
The `switches` time points are ordered from old to recent timestamps. This condition is checked by the test `validate rebase records in JSON files` in `RebaseDateTimeSuite`. Also sizes of the `switches` and `diffs` arrays are the same (this is checked by the same test).
- The **_Asia/Tehran, Iran, Africa/Casablanca and Africa/El_Aaiun_** time zones weren't added to the JSON files, see [SPARK-31385](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31385)
- The rebase info from the JSON files is placed to hash tables - `gregJulianRebaseMap` and `julianGregRebaseMap`. I use `AnyRefMap` because it is almost 2 times faster than Scala's immutable Map. Also I tried `java.util.HashMap` but it has worse lookup time than `AnyRefMap` in our case.
The hash maps store the switch time points and diffs in microseconds precision to avoid conversions from microseconds to seconds in the runtime.
- I moved the code related to days and microseconds rebasing to the separate object `RebaseDateTime` to do not pollute `DateTimeUtils`. Tests related to date-time rebasing are moved to `RebaseDateTimeSuite` for the same reason.
- I placed rebasing via local timestamp to separate methods that require zone id as the first parameter assuming that the caller has zone id already. This allows to void unnecessary retrieving the default time zone. The methods are marked as `private[sql]` because they are used in `RebaseDateTimeSuite` as reference implementation.
- Modified the `rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros()` and `rebaseJulianToGregorianMicros()` methods in `RebaseDateTime` to look up the rebase tables first of all. If hash maps don't contain rebasing info for the given time zone id, the methods falls back to the implementation via local timestamps. This allows to support time zones specified as zone offsets like '-08:00'.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make timestamps rebasing faster:
- Saving timestamps to parquet files is ~ **x3.8 faster**
- Loading timestamps from parquet files is ~**x2.8 faster**.
- Loading timestamps by Vectorized reader ~**x4.6 faster**.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Added the test `validate rebase records in JSON files` to `RebaseDateTimeSuite`. The test validates 2 json files from the resource folder - `gregorian-julian-rebase-micros.json` and `julian-gregorian-rebase-micros.json`, and it checks per each time zone records that
- the number of switch points is equal to the number of diffs between calendars. If the numbers are different, this will violate the assumption made in `RebaseDateTime.rebaseMicros`.
- swith points are ordered from old to recent timestamps. This pre-condition is required for linear search in the `rebaseMicros` function.
- Added the test `optimization of micros rebasing - Gregorian to Julian` to `RebaseDateTimeSuite` which iterates over timestamps from 0001-01-01 to 2100-01-01 with the steps 1 ± 0.5 months, and checks that optimised function `RebaseDateTime`.`rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros()` returns the same result as non-optimised one. The check is performed for the UTC, PST, CET, Africa/Dakar, America/Los_Angeles, Antarctica/Vostok, Asia/Hong_Kong, Europe/Amsterdam time zones.
- Added the test `optimization of micros rebasing - Julian to Gregorian` to `RebaseDateTimeSuite` which does similar checks as the test above but for rebasing from the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian) to Proleptic Gregorian calendar.
- The tests for days rebasing are moved from `DateTimeUtilsSuite` to `RebaseDateTimeSuite` because the rebasing related code is moved from `DateTimeUtils` to the separate object `RebaseDateTime`.
- Re-run `DateTimeRebaseBenchmark` at the America/Los_Angeles time zone (it is set explicitly in the PR #28127):
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) |
| Java | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_242 and OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.6+10 |
Closes#28119 from MaxGekk/optimize-rebase-micros.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A new function `json_object_keys` is proposed in this PR. This function will return all the keys of the outmost json object. It takes Json Object as an argument.
- If invalid json expression is given, `NULL` will be returned.
- If an empty string or json array is given, `NULL` will be returned.
- If valid json object is given, all the keys of the outmost object will be returned as an array.
- For empty json object, empty array is returned.
We can also get JSON object keys using `map_keys+from_json`. But `json_object_keys` is more efficient.
```
Performance result for json_object = {"a":[1,2,3,4,5], "b":[2,4,5,12333321]}
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU 2.60GHz
JSON functions: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
json_object_keys 11666 12361 673 0.9 1166.6 1.0X
from_json+map_keys 15309 15973 701 0.7 1530.9 0.8X
```
### Why are the changes needed?
This function will help naive users in directly extracting the keys from json string and its fairly intuitive as well. Also its extends the functionality of spark-sql for json strings.
Some of the most popular DBMSs supports this function.
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- MariaDB
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now users can extract keys of json objects using this function.
### How was this patch tested?
UTs added.
Closes#27836 from iRakson/jsonKeys.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
At the moment we do not have any function to compute length of JSON array directly.
I propose a `json_array_length` function which will return the length of the outermost JSON array.
- This function will return length of the outermost JSON array, if JSON array is valid.
```
scala> spark.sql("select json_array_length('[1,2,3,[33,44],{\"key\":[2,3,4]}]')").show
+--------------------------------------------------+
|json_array_length([1,2,3,[33,44],{"key":[2,3,4]}])|
+--------------------------------------------------+
| 5|
+--------------------------------------------------+
scala> spark.sql("select json_array_length('[[1],[2,3]]')").show
+------------------------------+
|json_array_length([[1],[2,3]])|
+------------------------------+
| 2|
+------------------------------+
```
- In case of any other valid JSON string, invalid JSON string or null array or `NULL` input , `NULL` will be returned.
```
scala> spark.sql("select json_array_length('')").show
+-------------------+
|json_array_length()|
+-------------------+
| null|
+-------------------+
```
### Why are the changes needed?
- As mentioned in JIRA, this function is supported by presto, postgreSQL, redshift, SQLite, MySQL, MariaDB, IBM DB2.
- for better user experience and ease of use.
```
Performance Result for Json array - [1, 2, 3, 4]
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU 2.60GHz
JSON functions: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
json_array_length 7728 7762 53 1.3 772.8 1.0X
size+from_json 12739 12895 199 0.8 1273.9 0.6X
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now users can get length of a json array by using `json_array_length`.
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Closes#27759 from iRakson/jsonArrayLength.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Previously, user can issue `SHOW TABLES` to get info of both tables and views.
This PR (SPARK-31113) implements `SHOW VIEWS` SQL command similar to HIVE to get views only.(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+DDL#LanguageManualDDL-ShowViews)
**Hive** -- Only show view names
```
hive> SHOW VIEWS;
OK
view_1
view_2
...
```
**Spark(Hive-Compatible)** -- Only show view names, used in tests and `SparkSQLDriver` for CLI applications
```
SHOW VIEWS IN showdb;
view_1
view_2
...
```
**Spark** -- Show more information database/viewName/isTemporary
```
spark-sql> SHOW VIEWS;
userdb view_1 false
userdb view_2 false
...
```
### Why are the changes needed?
`SHOW VIEWS` command provides better granularity to only get information of views.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Add new `SHOW VIEWS` SQL command
### How was this patch tested?
Add new test `show-views.sql` and pass existing tests
Closes#27897 from Eric5553/ShowViews.
Authored-by: Eric Wu <492960551@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the added version of `spark.sql.execution.pandas.udf.buffer.size` to 3.0.0 (see also SPARK-27870)
### Why are the changes needed?
To show the correct version added.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes but only in the unreleased branches. It will change the version shown in SQL documentation.
### How was this patch tested?
Not tested. Jenkins will test it out.
Closes#28144 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-30841-followup.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a minor PR used to fix some typo and improve comments mentioned with https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28081/files#r402874997
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix some typo and improve comments.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#28112 from beliefer/fix-typo-in-codegen.
Authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add tests to check that code generation doesn't fail if expressions string argument contains escape chars. The PR adds similar tests added by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20182 for `from_utc_timestamp` / `to_utc_timestamp`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To prevent regressions in the future.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the affected tests
Closes#28115 from MaxGekk/tests-arg-escape.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposed to skip predicates on PythonUDFs to be pushdown through Aggregate.
### Why are the changes needed?
The predicates on PythonUDFs cannot be pushdown through Aggregate. Pushed down predicates cannot be evaluate because PythonUDFs cannot be evaluated on Filter and cause error like:
```
Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot generate code for expression: mean(input[1, struct<bar:bigint>, true].bar)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Unevaluable.doGenCode(Expression.scala:304)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Unevaluable.doGenCode$(Expression.scala:303)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.PythonUDF.doGenCode(PythonUDF.scala:52)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression.$anonfun$genCode$3(Expression.scala:146)
at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:189)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression.genCode(Expression.scala:141)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.doGenCode(Cast.scala:821)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression.$anonfun$genCode$3(Expression.scala:146)
at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:189)
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Previously the predicates on PythonUDFs will be pushdown through Aggregate can cause error. After this change, the query can work.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#28089 from viirya/SPARK-30921.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The auto-generated alias name of built-in function `version()` is `sparkversion()`. After this PR, it is updated to `version()`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Based on our auto-generated alias name convention for the built-in functions, the alias names should be consistent with the function names.
This built-in function `version` is added in the upcoming Spark 3.0. Thus, we should fix it before the release.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Update the column name in schema if users do not specify the alias.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case.
Closes#28131 from gatorsmile/spark-29554followup.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Fix the `rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros()` function in `DateTimeUtils` by passing the daylight saving offset associated with the input `micros` to the constructed instance of `GregorianCalendar`. The problem is in `cal.getTimeInMillis` which returns earliest instant in the case of local date-time overlaps, see https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-jdk8u/blob/master/jdk/src/share/classes/java/util/GregorianCalendar.java#L2783-L2786 . I fixed the issue by keeping the standard zone offset as is, and set the DST offset only. I don't set `ZONE_OFFSET` because time zone resolution works differently in Java 8 and Java 7 time APIs. So, if I would set the standard zone offsets too, this could change the behavior, and rebasing won't give the same result as Spark 2.4.
2. Fix `rebaseJulianToGregorianMicros()` by changing resulted zoned date-time if `DST_OFFSET` is zero which means the input date-time has passed an autumn daylight savings cutover. So, I take the latest local timestamp out of 2 overlapped timestamps. Otherwise I return a zoned date-time w/o any modification because it is equal to calling the `withEarlierOffsetAtOverlap()` method, so, we can optimize the case.
### Why are the changes needed?
This fixes the bug of loosing of DST offset info in rebasing timestamps via local date-time. For example, there are 2 different timestamps in the `America/Los_Angeles` time zone: `2019-11-03T01:00:00-07:00` and `2019-11-03T01:00:00-08:00`, though they are mapped to the same local date-time `2019-11-03T01:00`, see
<img width="456" alt="Screen Shot 2020-04-02 at 10 19 24" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1580697/78245697-95a7da00-74f0-11ea-9eba-c08138851cb3.png">
Currently, the UTC timestamp `2019-11-03T09:00:00Z` is converted to `2019-11-03T01:00:00-08:00`, and then to `2019-11-03T01:00:00` (in the original calendar, for instance Proleptic Gregorian calendar) and back to the UTC timestamp `2019-11-03T08:00:00Z` (in the hybrid calendar - Gregorian for the timestamp). That's wrong because the local timestamp must be converted to the original timestamp `2019-11-03T09:00:00Z`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
- Added a test to `DateTimeUtilsSuite` which checks that rebased micros are the same as the input during DST. The result must be the same if Java 8 and 7 time API functions return the same time zone offsets.
- Run the following code to check that there is no difference between rebased and original micros for modern timestamps:
```scala
test("rebasing differences") {
withDefaultTimeZone(getZoneId("America/Los_Angeles")) {
val start = instantToMicros(LocalDateTime.of(1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0)
.atZone(getZoneId("America/Los_Angeles"))
.toInstant)
val end = instantToMicros(LocalDateTime.of(2030, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0)
.atZone(getZoneId("America/Los_Angeles"))
.toInstant)
var micros = start
var diff = Long.MaxValue
var counter = 0
while (micros < end) {
val rebased = rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros(micros)
val curDiff = rebased - micros
if (curDiff != diff) {
counter += 1
diff = curDiff
val ldt = microsToInstant(micros).atZone(getZoneId("America/Los_Angeles")).toLocalDateTime
println(s"local date-time = $ldt diff = ${diff / MICROS_PER_MINUTE} minutes")
}
micros += 30 * MICROS_PER_MINUTE
}
println(s"counter = $counter")
}
}
```
```
local date-time = 0001-01-01T00:00 diff = -2872 minutes
local date-time = 0100-03-01T00:00 diff = -1432 minutes
local date-time = 0200-03-01T00:00 diff = 7 minutes
local date-time = 0300-03-01T00:00 diff = 1447 minutes
local date-time = 0500-03-01T00:00 diff = 2887 minutes
local date-time = 0600-03-01T00:00 diff = 4327 minutes
local date-time = 0700-03-01T00:00 diff = 5767 minutes
local date-time = 0900-03-01T00:00 diff = 7207 minutes
local date-time = 1000-03-01T00:00 diff = 8647 minutes
local date-time = 1100-03-01T00:00 diff = 10087 minutes
local date-time = 1300-03-01T00:00 diff = 11527 minutes
local date-time = 1400-03-01T00:00 diff = 12967 minutes
local date-time = 1500-03-01T00:00 diff = 14407 minutes
local date-time = 1582-10-15T00:00 diff = 7 minutes
local date-time = 1883-11-18T12:22:58 diff = 0 minutes
counter = 15
```
The code is not added to `DateTimeUtilsSuite` because it takes > 30 seconds.
- By running the updated benchmark `DateTimeRebaseBenchmark` via the command:
```
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.DateTimeRebaseBenchmark"
```
in the environment:
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) |
| Java | OpenJDK 1.8.0_242-8u242/11.0.6+10 |
Closes#28101 from MaxGekk/fix-local-date-overlap.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to add a new SQL config for controlling a plan explain mode in the events of (e.g., `SparkListenerSQLExecutionStart` and `SparkListenerSQLAdaptiveExecutionUpdate`) SQL listeners. In the current master, the output of `QueryExecution.toString` (this is equivalent to the "extended" explain mode) is stored in these events. I think it is useful to control the content via `SQLConf`. For example, the query "Details" content (TPCDS q66 query) of a SQL tab in a Spark web UI will be changed as follows;
Before this PR:
After this PR:
### Why are the changes needed?
For better usability.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes; since Spark 3.1, SQL UI data adopts the `formatted` mode for the query plan explain results. To restore the behavior before Spark 3.0, you can set `spark.sql.ui.explainMode` to `extended`.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Closes#28097 from maropu/SPARK-31325.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After my investigation, `SQLQueryTestSuite` spent a lot of time compiling the generated java code.
Take `group-by.sql` as an example.
At first, I added some debug log into `SQLQueryTestSuite`.
Please reference 92b6af740c/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala (L402)
The execution command is as follows:
`build/sbt "~sql/test-only *SQLQueryTestSuite -- -z group-by.sql"`
The output show below:
```
00:56:06.192 WARN org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite: group-by.sql using configs: spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage=true. run time: 20604
00:56:13.719 WARN org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite: group-by.sql using configs: spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage=false,spark.sql.codegen.factoryMode=CODEGEN_ONLY. run time: 7526
00:56:18.786 WARN org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite: group-by.sql using configs: spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage=false,spark.sql.codegen.factoryMode=NO_CODEGEN. run time: 5066
```
According to the log, we know.
Config | Run time(ms)
-- | --
spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage=true | 20604
spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage=false,spark.sql.codegen.factoryMode=CODEGEN_ONLY | 7526
spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage=false,spark.sql.codegen.factoryMode=NO_CODEGEN | 5066
We should display the total compile time for generated java code.
This PR will add the following to `SQLQueryTestSuite`'s output.
```
=== Metrics of Whole Codegen ===
Total compile time: 80.564516529 seconds
```
Note: At first, I wanted to use `CodegenMetrics.METRIC_COMPILATION_TIME` to do this. After many experiments, I found that `CodegenMetrics.METRIC_COMPILATION_TIME` is only effective for a single test case, and cannot play a role in the whole life cycle of `SQLQueryTestSuite`.
I checked the type of ` CodegenMetrics.METRIC_COMPILATION_TIME` is `Histogram` and the latter preserves 1028 elements.` Histogram` is a metric which calculates the distribution of a value.
### Why are the changes needed?
Display the total compile time for generated java code.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#28081 from beliefer/output-codegen-compile-time.
Lead-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
rename `QueryPlan.collectInPlanAndSubqueries` to `collectWithSubqueries`
### Why are the changes needed?
The old name is too verbose. `QueryPlan` is internal but it's the core of catalyst and we'd better make the API name clearer before we release it.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#28092 from cloud-fan/rename.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to replace the following SQL configs:
1. `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTime.enabled` by
- `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTimeInWrite.enabled` (`false` by default). The config enables rebasing dates/timestamps while saving to Parquet files. If it is set to `true`, dates/timestamps are converted to local date-time in Proleptic Gregorian calendar, date-time fields are extracted, and used in building new local date-time in the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian). The resulted local date-time is converted to days or microseconds since the epoch.
- `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTimeInRead.enabled` (`false` by default). The config enables rebasing of dates/timestamps in reading from Parquet files.
2. `spark.sql.legacy.avro.rebaseDateTime.enabled` by
- `spark.sql.legacy.avro.rebaseDateTimeInWrite.enabled` (`false` by default). It enables dates/timestamps rebasing from Proleptic Gregorian calendar to the hybrid calendar via local date/timestamps.
- `spark.sql.legacy.avro.rebaseDateTimeInRead.enabled` (`false` by default). It enables rebasing dates/timestamps from the hybrid calendar to Proleptic Gregorian calendar in read. The rebasing is performed by converting micros/millis/days to a local date/timestamp in the source calendar, interpreting the resulted date/timestamp in the target calendar, and getting the number of micros/millis/days since the epoch 1970-01-01 00:00:00Z.
### Why are the changes needed?
This allows to load dates/timestamps saved by Spark 2.4, and save to Parquet/Avro files without rebasing. And the reverse use case - load data saved by Spark 3.0, and save it in the form which is compatible with Spark 2.4.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, users have to use new SQL configs. Old SQL configs are removed by the PR.
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `AvroV1Suite`, `AvroV2Suite` and `ParquetIOSuite`.
Closes#28082 from MaxGekk/split-rebase-configs.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Create statement plans in `DataFrameWriter(V2)`, like the SQL API.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's better to leave all the resolution work to the analyzer.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27992 from cloud-fan/statement.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to replace current implementation of the `rebaseGregorianToJulianDays()` and `rebaseJulianToGregorianDays()` functions in `DateTimeUtils` by new one which is based on the fact that difference between Proleptic Gregorian and the hybrid (Julian+Gregorian) calendars was changed only 14 times for entire supported range of valid dates `[0001-01-01, 9999-12-31]`:
| date | Proleptic Greg. days | Hybrid (Julian+Greg) days | diff|
| ---- | ----|----|----|
|0001-01-01|-719162|-719164|-2|
|0100-03-01|-682944|-682945|-1|
|0200-03-01|-646420|-646420|0|
|0300-03-01|-609896|-609895|1|
|0500-03-01|-536847|-536845|2|
|0600-03-01|-500323|-500320|3|
|0700-03-01|-463799|-463795|4|
|0900-03-01|-390750|-390745|5|
|1000-03-01|-354226|-354220|6|
|1100-03-01|-317702|-317695|7|
|1300-03-01|-244653|-244645|8|
|1400-03-01|-208129|-208120|9|
|1500-03-01|-171605|-171595|10|
|1582-10-15|-141427|-141427|0|
For the given days since the epoch, the proposed implementation finds the range of days which the input days belongs to, and adds the diff in days between calendars to the input. The result is rebased days since the epoch in the target calendar.
For example, if need to rebase -650000 days from Proleptic Gregorian calendar to the hybrid calendar. In that case, the input falls to the bucket [-682944, -646420), the diff associated with the range is -1. To get the rebased days in Julian calendar, we should add -1 to -650000, and the result is -650001.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make dates rebasing faster.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, the results should be the same for valid range of the `DATE` type `[0001-01-01, 9999-12-31]`.
### How was this patch tested?
- Added 2 tests to `DateTimeUtilsSuite` for the `rebaseGregorianToJulianDays()` and `rebaseJulianToGregorianDays()` functions. The tests check that results of old and new implementation (optimized version) are the same for all supported dates.
- Re-run `DateTimeRebaseBenchmark` on:
| Item | Description |
| ---- | ----|
| Region | us-west-2 (Oregon) |
| Instance | r3.xlarge |
| AMI | ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-bionic-18.04-amd64-server-20190722.1 (ami-06f2f779464715dc5) |
| Java | OpenJDK8/11 |
Closes#28067 from MaxGekk/optimize-rebasing.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```sql
scala> spark.sql(" select * from values(1), (2) t(key) where key in (select 1 as key where 1=0)").queryExecution
res15: org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution =
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [*]
+- 'Filter 'key IN (list#39 [])
: +- Project [1 AS key#38]
: +- Filter (1 = 0)
: +- OneRowRelation
+- 'SubqueryAlias t
+- 'UnresolvedInlineTable [key], [List(1), List(2)]
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
key: int
Project [key#40]
+- Filter key#40 IN (list#39 [])
: +- Project [1 AS key#38]
: +- Filter (1 = 0)
: +- OneRowRelation
+- SubqueryAlias t
+- LocalRelation [key#40]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Join LeftSemi, (key#40 = key#38)
:- LocalRelation [key#40]
+- LocalRelation <empty>, [key#38]
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) BroadcastHashJoin [key#40], [key#38], LeftSemi, BuildRight
:- *(1) LocalTableScan [key#40]
+- Br...
```
`LocalRelation <empty> ` should be able to propagate after subqueries are lift up to joins
### Why are the changes needed?
optimize query
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
add new tests
Closes#28043 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31280.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-25387 avoids npe for bad csv input, but when reading bad csv input with `columnNameCorruptRecord` specified, `getCurrentInput` is called and it still throws npe.
### Why are the changes needed?
Bug fix.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Add a test.
Closes#28029 from wzhfy/corrupt_column_npe.
Authored-by: Zhenhua Wang <wzh_zju@163.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to prune unnecessary nested fields from Generate which has no Project on top of it.
### Why are the changes needed?
In Optimizer, we can prune nested columns from Project(projectList, Generate). However, unnecessary columns could still possibly be read in Generate, if no Project on top of it. We should prune it too.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#27517 from viirya/SPARK-29721-2.
Lead-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <liangchi@uber.com>
Co-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The query plan of Spark SQL is a mutually recursive structure: QueryPlan -> Expression (PlanExpression) -> QueryPlan, but the transformations do not take this into account.
This PR refines the comments of `QueryPlan` to highlight this fact.
### Why are the changes needed?
better document.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#28050 from cloud-fan/comment.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to change types of `DateTimeTestUtils` values and functions by replacing `java.util.TimeZone` to `java.time.ZoneId`. In particular:
1. Type of `ALL_TIMEZONES` is changed to `Seq[ZoneId]`.
2. Remove `val outstandingTimezones: Seq[TimeZone]`.
3. Change the type of the time zone parameter in `withDefaultTimeZone` to `ZoneId`.
4. Modify affected test suites.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, Spark SQL's date-time expressions and functions have been already ported on Java 8 time API but tests still use old time APIs. In particular, `DateTimeTestUtils` exposes functions that accept only TimeZone instances. This is inconvenient, and CPU consuming because need to convert TimeZone instances to ZoneId instances via strings (zone ids).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By affected test suites executed by jenkins builds.
Closes#28033 from MaxGekk/with-default-time-zone.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
OuterReference is one LeafExpression, so it's children is Nil, which makes its SQL representation always be outer(). This makes our explain-command and error msg unclear when OuterReference exists.
e.g.
```scala
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException:
Aggregate/Window/Generate expressions are not valid in where clause of the query.
Expression in where clause: [(in.`value` = max(outer()))]
Invalid expressions: [max(outer())];;
```
This PR override its `sql` method with its `prettyName` and single argment `e`'s `sql` methond
### Why are the changes needed?
improve err message
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, the err msg caused by OuterReference has changed
### How was this patch tested?
modified ut results
Closes#27985 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31225.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. `DataSourceStrategy.scala` is extended to create `org.apache.spark.sql.sources.Filter` from nested expressions.
2. Translation from nested `org.apache.spark.sql.sources.Filter` to `org.apache.parquet.filter2.predicate.FilterPredicate` is implemented to support nested predicate pushdown for Parquet.
### Why are the changes needed?
Better performance for handling nested predicate pushdown.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
New tests are added.
Closes#27728 from dbtsai/SPARK-17636.
Authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Skew join handling comes with an overhead: we need to read some data repeatedly. We should treat a partition as skewed if it's large enough so that it's beneficial to do so.
Currently the size threshold is the advisory partition size, which is 64 MB by default. This is not large enough for the skewed partition size threshold.
This PR adds a new config for the threshold and set default value as 256 MB.
### Why are the changes needed?
Avoid skew join handling that may introduce a perf regression.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27967 from cloud-fan/aqe.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR targets for non-nullable null type not to coerce to nullable type in complex types.
Non-nullable fields in struct, elements in an array and entries in map can mean empty array, struct and map. They are empty so it does not need to force the nullability when we find common types.
This PR also reverts and supersedes d7b97a1d0d
### Why are the changes needed?
To make type coercion coherent and consistent. Currently, we correctly keep the nullability even between non-nullable fields:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
spark.range(1).select(array(lit(1)).cast(ArrayType(IntegerType, false))).printSchema()
spark.range(1).select(array(lit(1)).cast(ArrayType(DoubleType, false))).printSchema()
```
```scala
spark.range(1).selectExpr("concat(array(1), array(1)) as arr").printSchema()
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes.
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
spark.range(1).select(array().cast(ArrayType(IntegerType, false))).printSchema()
```
```scala
spark.range(1).selectExpr("concat(array(), array(1)) as arr").printSchema()
```
**Before:**
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'array()' due to data type mismatch: cannot cast array<null> to array<int>;;
'Project [cast(array() as array<int>) AS array()#68]
+- Range (0, 1, step=1, splits=Some(12))
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.package$AnalysisErrorAt.failAnalysis(package.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$$nestedInanonfun$checkAnalysis$1$2.applyOrElse(CheckAnalysis.scala:149)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$$nestedInanonfun$checkAnalysis$1$2.applyOrElse(CheckAnalysis.scala:140)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$transformUp$2(TreeNode.scala:333)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:72)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:333)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$transformUp$1(TreeNode.scala:330)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$mapChildren$1(TreeNode.scala:399)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:237)
```
```
root
|-- arr: array (nullable = false)
| |-- element: integer (containsNull = true)
```
**After:**
```
root
|-- array(): array (nullable = false)
| |-- element: integer (containsNull = false)
```
```
root
|-- arr: array (nullable = false)
| |-- element: integer (containsNull = false)
```
### How was this patch tested?
Unittests were added and manually tested.
Closes#27991 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31227.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add a few `ZoneId` constant values to the `DateTimeTestUtils` object, and reuse the constants in tests. Proposed the following constants:
- PST = -08:00
- UTC = +00:00
- CEST = +02:00
- CET = +01:00
- JST = +09:00
- MIT = -09:30
- LA = America/Los_Angeles
### Why are the changes needed?
All proposed constant values (except `LA`) are initialized by zone offsets according to their definitions. This will allow to avoid:
- Using of 3-letter time zones that have been already deprecated in JDK, see _Three-letter time zone IDs_ in https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/TimeZone.html
- Incorrect mapping of 3-letter time zones to zone offsets, see SPARK-31237. For example, `PST` is mapped to `America/Los_Angeles` instead of the `-08:00` zone offset.
Also this should improve stability and maintainability of test suites.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running affected test suites.
Closes#28001 from MaxGekk/replace-pst.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark introduced CHAR type for hive compatibility but it only works for hive tables. CHAR type is never documented and is treated as STRING type for non-Hive tables.
However, this leads to confusing behaviors
**Apache Spark 3.0.0-preview2**
```
spark-sql> CREATE TABLE t(a CHAR(3));
spark-sql> INSERT INTO TABLE t SELECT 'a ';
spark-sql> SELECT a, length(a) FROM t;
a 2
```
**Apache Spark 2.4.5**
```
spark-sql> CREATE TABLE t(a CHAR(3));
spark-sql> INSERT INTO TABLE t SELECT 'a ';
spark-sql> SELECT a, length(a) FROM t;
a 3
```
According to the SQL standard, `CHAR(3)` should guarantee all the values are of length 3. Since `CHAR(3)` is treated as STRING so Spark doesn't guarantee it.
This PR forbids CHAR type in non-Hive tables as it's not supported correctly.
### Why are the changes needed?
avoid confusing/wrong behavior
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, now users can't create/alter non-Hive tables with CHAR type.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#27902 from cloud-fan/char.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr intends to add unit tests for the other join hints (`MERGEJOIN`, `SHUFFLE_HASH`, and `SHUFFLE_REPLICATE_NL`). This is a followup PR of #27935.
### Why are the changes needed?
For better test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Closes#28013 from maropu/SPARK-25121-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to update the doc for `spark.sql.session.timeZone`, and restrict format of config's values to 2 forms:
1. Geographical regions, such as `America/Los_Angeles`.
2. Fixed offsets - a fully resolved offset from UTC. For example, `-08:00`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Other formats such as three-letter time zone IDs are ambitious, and depend on the locale. For example, `CST` could be U.S. `Central Standard Time` and `China Standard Time`. Such formats have been already deprecated in JDK, see [Three-letter time zone IDs](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/TimeZone.html).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running `./dev/scalastyle`, and manual testing.
Closes#27999 from MaxGekk/doc-session-time-zone.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To support case class parameter for typed Scala UDF, e.g.
```
case class TestData(key: Int, value: String)
val f = (d: TestData) => d.key * d.value.toInt
val myUdf = udf(f)
val df = Seq(("data", TestData(50, "2"))).toDF("col1", "col2")
checkAnswer(df.select(myUdf(Column("col2"))), Row(100) :: Nil)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, Spark UDF can only work on data types like java.lang.String, o.a.s.sql.Row, Seq[_], etc. This is inconvenient if user want to apply an operation on one column, and the column is struct type. You must access data from a Row object, instead of domain object like Dataset operations. It will be great if UDF can work on types that are supported by Dataset, e.g. case class.
And here's benchmark result of using case class comparing to row:
```scala
// case class: 58ms 65ms 59ms 64ms 61ms
// row: 59ms 64ms 73ms 84ms 69ms
val f1 = (d: TestData) => s"${d.key}, ${d.value}"
val f2 = (r: Row) => s"${r.getInt(0)}, ${r.getString(1)}"
val udf1 = udf(f1)
// set spark.sql.legacy.allowUntypedScalaUDF=true
val udf2 = udf(f2, StringType)
val df = spark.range(100000).selectExpr("cast (id as int) as id")
.select(struct('id, lit("str")).as("col"))
df.cache().collect()
// warmup to exclude some extra influence
df.select(udf1('col)).write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).format("noop").save()
df.select(udf2('col)).write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).format("noop").save()
start = System.currentTimeMillis()
df.select(udf1('col)).write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).format("noop").save()
println(System.currentTimeMillis() - start)
start = System.currentTimeMillis()
df.select(udf2('col)).write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).format("noop").save()
println(System.currentTimeMillis() - start)
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. User now could be able to use typed Scala UDF with case class as input parameter.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Closes#27937 from Ngone51/udf_caseclass_support.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to apply rebasing for all dates/timestamps in conversion functions `fromJavaDate()`, `toJavaDate()`, `toJavaTimestamp()` and `fromJavaTimestamp()`. The rebasing is performed via building a local date-time in an original calendar, extracting date-time fields from the result, and creating new local date-time in the target calendar.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes are need to be compatible with previous Spark version (2.4.5 and earlier versions) not only before the Gregorian cutover date `1582-10-15` but also for dates after the date. For instance, Gregorian calendar implementation in Java 7 `java.util.GregorianCalendar` is not accurate in resolving time zone offsets as Gregorian calendar introduced since Java 8.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, this PR can introduce behavior changes for dates after `1582-10-15`, in particular conversions of zone ids to zone offsets will be much more accurate.
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite`, `DateExpressionsSuite`, `CollectionExpressionsSuite`, `HiveOrcHadoopFsRelationSuite`, `ParquetIOSuite`.
Closes#27980 from MaxGekk/reuse-rebase-funcs-in-java-funcs.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR (SPARK-31229) is rather a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27926 (SPARK-31166). It adds unittests for `TypeCoercion.findTypeForComplex` and `Cast.canCast` about struct, map and array with the respect to null types.
### Why are the changes needed?
To detect which scope was broken in the future easily.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, it's a test-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Unittests were added.
Closes#27990 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31166-followup.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412 introduced a behavior change that `date_add`/`date_sub` functions can't accept string and double values in the second parameter. This is reasonable as it's error-prone to cast string/double to int at runtime.
However, using string literals as function arguments is very common in SQL databases. To avoid breaking valid use cases that the string literal is indeed an integer, this PR proposes to add ansi_cast for string literal in date_add/date_sub functions. If the string value is not a valid integer, we fail at query compiling time because of constant folding.
### Why are the changes needed?
avoid breaking changes
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now 3.0 can run `date_add('2011-11-11', '1')` like 2.4
### How was this patch tested?
new tests.
Closes#27965 from cloud-fan/string.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve `ScalaReflection` to only don't erasure non user defined `AnyVal` type, but still erasure other types, e.g. `Any`. And this brings two benefits:
1. Give better encode error message for some unsupported types, e.g. `Any`
2. Won't miss the walk path for the `AnyVal` type
### Why are the changes needed?
Firstly, PR #15284 added encode(serializeFor/deserializeFor) support for value class, which extends `AnyVal`, by not erasure types. But, this also introduce a problem that when user try to encoder unsupported types, e.g. `Any`, it will fail on `java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: scala.Any` due to the reason that `scala.Any` doesn't erasure to `java.lang.Object`.
Also, in current `getClassNameFromType()`, it always erasure types which could missing walked path for user defined `AnyVal` types.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. For the test below:
```
case class Bar(i: Any)
case class Foo(i: Bar) extends AnyVal
test() {
implicitly[ExpressionEncoder[Foo]]
}
```
Before:
```
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: scala.Any
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:382)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:418)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:355)
...
````
After:
```
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: No Encoder found for Any
- field (class: "java.lang.Object", name: "i")
- field (class: "org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.Bar", name: "i")
- root class: "org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.Foo"
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.$anonfun$serializerFor$1(ScalaReflection.scala:561)
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit test and test manually.
Closes#27959 from Ngone51/impr_anyval.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to fix the issue of rebasing leap years in Julian calendar to Proleptic Gregorian calendar in which the years are not leap years. In the Julian calendar, every four years is a leap year, with a leap day added to the month of February. In Proleptic Gregorian calendar, every year that is exactly divisible by four is a leap year, except for years that are exactly divisible by 100, but these centurial years are leap years, if they are exactly divisible by 400. In this ways, the date **1000-02-29** exists in the Julian calendar but not in Proleptic Gregorian calendar.
I modified the `rebaseJulianToGregorianMicros()` and `rebaseJulianToGregorianDays()` in `DateTimeUtils` by passing 1 as a day number of month while forming `LocalDate` or `LocalDateTime`, and adding the number of days using the `plusDays()` method. For example, **1000-02-29** doesn't exist in Proleptic Gregorian calendar, and `LocalDate.of(1000, 2, 29)` throws an exception. To avoid the issue, I build the `LocalDate.of(1000, 2, 1)` date and add 28 days. The `plusDays(28)` method produces the next valid date after `1000-02-28` which is **1000-03-01**.
### Why are the changes needed?
Before the changes, the `java.time.DateTimeException` exception is raised while loading the date `1000-02-29` from parquet files saved by Spark 2.4.5:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTime.enabled", true)
scala> spark.read.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_date_leap").show
20/03/21 03:03:59 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 0.0 in stage 3.0 (TID 3)
java.time.DateTimeException: Invalid date 'February 29' as '1000' is not a leap year
```
The parquet files were saved via the commands:
```shell
$ export TZ="America/Los_Angeles"
```
```scala
scala> scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
scala> val df = Seq(java.sql.Date.valueOf("1000-02-29")).toDF("dateS").select($"dateS".as("date"))
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [date: date]
scala> df.write.mode("overwrite").parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_date_leap")
scala> spark.read.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_date_leap").show
+----------+
| date|
+----------+
|1000-02-29|
+----------+
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, after the fix:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTime.enabled", true)
scala> spark.read.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_date_leap").show
+----------+
| date|
+----------+
|1000-03-01|
+----------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests to `DateTimeUtilsSuite`.
Closes#27974 from MaxGekk/julian-date-29-feb.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix errors and missing parts for datetime pattern document
1. The pattern we use is similar to DateTimeFormatter and SimpleDateFormat but not identical. So we shouldn't use any of them in the API docs but use a link to the doc of our own.
2. Some pattern letters are missing
3. Some pattern letters are explicitly banned - Set('A', 'c', 'e', 'n', 'N')
4. the second fraction pattern different logic for parsing and formatting
### Why are the changes needed?
fix and improve doc
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, new and updated doc
### How was this patch tested?
pass Jenkins
viewed locally with `jekyll serve`
Closes#27956 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31189.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR addresses the issue of compatibility with Spark 2.4 and earlier version in reading/writing dates and timestamp via **Avro** datasource. Previous releases are based on a hybrid calendar - Julian + Gregorian. Since Spark 3.0, Proleptic Gregorian calendar is used by default, see SPARK-26651. In particular, the issue pops up for dates/timestamps before 1582-10-15 when the hybrid calendar switches from/to Gregorian to/from Julian calendar. The same local date in different calendar is converted to different number of days since the epoch 1970-01-01. For example, the 1001-01-01 date is converted to:
- -719164 in Julian calendar. Spark 2.4 saves the number as a value of DATE type into **Avro** files.
- -719162 in Proleptic Gregorian calendar. Spark 3.0 saves the number as a date value.
The PR proposes rebasing from/to Proleptic Gregorian calendar to the hybrid one under the SQL config:
```
spark.sql.legacy.avro.rebaseDateTime.enabled
```
which is set to `false` by default which means the rebasing is not performed by default.
The details of the implementation:
1. Re-use 2 methods of `DateTimeUtils` added by the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27915 for rebasing microseconds.
2. Re-use 2 methods of `DateTimeUtils` added by the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27915 for rebasing days.
3. Use `rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros()` and `rebaseGregorianToJulianDays()` while saving timestamps/dates to **Avro** files if the SQL config is on.
4. Use `rebaseJulianToGregorianMicros()` and `rebaseJulianToGregorianDays()` while loading timestamps/dates from **Avro** files if the SQL config is on.
5. The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.avro.rebaseDateTime.enabled` controls conversions from/to dates, and timestamps of the `timestamp-millis`, `timestamp-micros` logical types.
### Why are the changes needed?
For the backward compatibility with Spark 2.4 and earlier versions. The changes allow users to read dates/timestamps saved by previous version, and get the same result. Also after the changes, users can enable the rebasing in write, and save dates/timestamps that can be loaded correctly by Spark 2.4 and earlier versions.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, the timestamp `1001-01-01 01:02:03.123456` saved by Spark 2.4.5 as `timestamp-micros` is interpreted by Spark 3.0.0-preview2 differently:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
scala> spark.read.format("avro").load("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_date_avro").show(false)
+----------+
|date |
+----------+
|1001-01-07|
+----------+
```
After the changes:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.legacy.avro.rebaseDateTime.enabled", true)
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
scala> spark.read.format("avro").load("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_date_avro").show(false)
+----------+
|date |
+----------+
|1001-01-01|
+----------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
1. Added tests to `AvroLogicalTypeSuite` to check rebasing in read. The test reads back avro files saved by Spark 2.4.5 via:
```shell
$ export TZ="America/Los_Angeles"
```
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
scala> val df = Seq("1001-01-01").toDF("dateS").select($"dateS".cast("date").as("date"))
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [date: date]
scala> df.write.format("avro").save("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_date_avro")
scala> val df2 = Seq("1001-01-01 01:02:03.123456").toDF("tsS").select($"tsS".cast("timestamp").as("ts"))
df2: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [ts: timestamp]
scala> df2.write.format("avro").save("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_ts_avro")
scala> :paste
// Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
val timestampSchema = s"""
| {
| "namespace": "logical",
| "type": "record",
| "name": "test",
| "fields": [
| {"name": "ts", "type": ["null", {"type": "long","logicalType": "timestamp-millis"}], "default": null}
| ]
| }
|""".stripMargin
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
scala> df3.write.format("avro").option("avroSchema", timestampSchema).save("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_ts_millis_avro")
```
2. Added the following tests to `AvroLogicalTypeSuite` to check rebasing of dates/timestamps (in microsecond and millisecond precision). The tests write rebased a date/timestamps and read them back w/ enabled/disabled rebasing, and compare results. :
- `rebasing microseconds timestamps in write`
- `rebasing milliseconds timestamps in write`
- `rebasing dates in write`
Closes#27953 from MaxGekk/rebase-avro-datetime.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A few `CREATE TABLE` test cases have some assumption on the default value of `LEGACY_CREATE_HIVE_TABLE_BY_DEFAULT_ENABLED`. This PR (SPARK-31181) makes the test cases more explicit from test-case side.
The configuration change was tested via https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27894 during discussing SPARK-31136. This PR has only the test case part from that PR.
### Why are the changes needed?
This makes our test case more robust in terms of the default value of `LEGACY_CREATE_HIVE_TABLE_BY_DEFAULT_ENABLED`. Even in the case where we switch the conf value, that will be one-liner with no test case changes.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with the existing tests.
Closes#27946 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-EXPLICIT-TEST.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26933
Fraction string like "1.23" is definitely not a valid integral format and we should fail to do the cast under the ANSI mode.
### Why are the changes needed?
correct the ANSI cast behavior from string to integral
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes under ANSI mode, but ANSI mode is off by default.
### How was this patch tested?
new test
Closes#27957 from cloud-fan/ansi.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR addresses the issue of compatibility with Spark 2.4 and earlier version in reading/writing dates and timestamp via Parquet datasource. Previous releases are based on a hybrid calendar - Julian + Gregorian. Since Spark 3.0, Proleptic Gregorian calendar is used by default, see SPARK-26651. In particular, the issue pops up for dates/timestamps before 1582-10-15 when the hybrid calendar switches from/to Gregorian to/from Julian calendar. The same local date in different calendar is converted to different number of days since the epoch 1970-01-01. For example, the 1001-01-01 date is converted to:
- -719164 in Julian calendar. Spark 2.4 saves the number as a value of DATE type into parquet.
- -719162 in Proleptic Gregorian calendar. Spark 3.0 saves the number as a date value.
According to the parquet spec, parquet timestamps of the `TIMESTAMP_MILLIS`, `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` output type and parquet dates should be based on Proleptic Gregorian calendar but the `INT96` timestamps should be stored as Julian days. Since the version 3.0, Spark conforms the spec but for the backward compatibility with previous version, the PR proposes rebasing from/to Proleptic Gregorian calendar to the hybrid one under the SQL config:
```
spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTime.enabled
```
which is set to `false` by default which means the rebasing is not performed by default.
The details of the implementation:
1. Added 2 methods to `DateTimeUtils` for rebasing microseconds. `rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros()` builds a local timestamp in Proleptic Gregorian calendar, extracts date-time fields `year`, `month`, ..., `second fraction` from the local timestamp and uses them to build another local timestamp based on the hybrid calendar (using `java.util.Calendar` API). After that it calculates the number of microseconds since the epoch using the resulted local timestamp. The function performs the conversion via the system JVM time zone for compatibility with Spark 2.4 and earlier versions. The `rebaseJulianToGregorianMicros()` function does reverse conversion.
2. Added 2 methods to `DateTimeUtils` for rebasing days. `rebaseGregorianToJulianDays()` builds a local date from the passed number of days since the epoch in Proleptic Gregorian calendar, interprets the resulted date as a local date in the hybrid calendar and gets the number of days since the epoch from the resulted local date. The conversion is performed via the `UTC` time zone because the conversion is independent from time zones, and `UTC` is selected to void round issues of casting days to milliseconds and back. The `rebaseJulianToGregorianDays()` functions does revers conversion.
3. Use `rebaseGregorianToJulianMicros()` and `rebaseGregorianToJulianDays()` while saving timestamps/dates to parquet files if the SQL config is on.
4. Use `rebaseJulianToGregorianMicros()` and `rebaseJulianToGregorianDays()` while loading timestamps/dates from parquet files if the SQL config is on.
5. The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTime.enabled` controls conversions from/to dates, timestamps of `TIMESTAMP_MILLIS`, `TIMESTAMP_MICROS`, see the SQL config `spark.sql.parquet.outputTimestampType`.
6. The rebasing is always performed for `INT96` timestamps, independently from `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTime.enabled`.
7. Supported the vectorized parquet reader, see the SQL config `spark.sql.parquet.enableVectorizedReader`.
### Why are the changes needed?
- For the backward compatibility with Spark 2.4 and earlier versions. The changes allow users to read dates/timestamps saved by previous version, and get the same result. Also after the changes, users can enable the rebasing in write, and save dates/timestamps that can be loaded correctly by Spark 2.4 and earlier versions.
- It fixes the bug of incorrect saving/loading timestamps of the `INT96` type
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, the timestamp `1001-01-01 01:02:03.123456` saved by Spark 2.4.5 as `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` is interpreted by Spark 3.0.0-preview2 differently:
```scala
scala> spark.read.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_ts_micros").show(false)
+--------------------------+
|ts |
+--------------------------+
|1001-01-07 11:32:20.123456|
+--------------------------+
```
After the changes:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTime.enabled", true)
scala> spark.read.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_ts_micros").show(false)
+--------------------------+
|ts |
+--------------------------+
|1001-01-01 01:02:03.123456|
+--------------------------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
1. Added tests to `ParquetIOSuite` to check rebasing in read for regular reader and vectorized parquet reader. The test reads back parquet files saved by Spark 2.4.5 via:
```shell
$ export TZ="America/Los_Angeles"
```
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
scala> val df = Seq("1001-01-01").toDF("dateS").select($"dateS".cast("date").as("date"))
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [date: date]
scala> df.write.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_date")
scala> val df = Seq("1001-01-01 01:02:03.123456").toDF("tsS").select($"tsS".cast("timestamp").as("ts"))
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [ts: timestamp]
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.parquet.outputTimestampType", "TIMESTAMP_MICROS")
scala> df.write.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_ts_micros")
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.parquet.outputTimestampType", "TIMESTAMP_MILLIS")
scala> df.write.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_ts_millis")
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.parquet.outputTimestampType", "INT96")
scala> df.write.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/2_4_5_ts_int96")
```
2. Manually check the write code path. Save date/timestamps (TIMESTAMP_MICROS, TIMESTAMP_MILLIS, INT96) by Spark 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT (after the changes):
```bash
$ export TZ="America/Los_Angeles"
```
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.legacy.parquet.rebaseDateTime.enabled", true)
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.parquet.outputTimestampType", "TIMESTAMP_MICROS")
scala> val df = Seq(("1001-01-01", "1001-01-01 01:02:03.123456")).toDF("dateS", "tsS").select($"dateS".cast("date").as("d"), $"tsS".cast("timestamp").as("ts"))
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [d: date, ts: timestamp]
scala> df.write.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/3_0_0_micros")
scala> spark.read.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/3_0_0_micros").show(false)
+----------+--------------------------+
|d |ts |
+----------+--------------------------+
|1001-01-01|1001-01-01 01:02:03.123456|
+----------+--------------------------+
```
Read the saved date/timestamp by Spark 2.4.5:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "America/Los_Angeles")
scala> spark.read.parquet("/Users/maxim/tmp/before_1582/3_0_0_micros").show(false)
+----------+--------------------------+
|d |ts |
+----------+--------------------------+
|1001-01-01|1001-01-01 01:02:03.123456|
+----------+--------------------------+
```
Closes#27915 from MaxGekk/rebase-parquet-datetime.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27936 to update document.
### Why are the changes needed?
correct document
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27950 from cloud-fan/null.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
pattern `''` means literal `'`
```sql
select date_format(to_timestamp("11111904-01-23 15:02:01", 'y-MM-dd HH:mm:ss'), "y-MM-dd HH:mm:ss''SSSSSSSSS");
5377-02-14 06:27:19'000000519
```
0946a9514f missed this case and this pr add it back.
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
add ut
Closes#27949 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31150-2.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Prpend `-` to the compare result instead of creating a new reverse comparator for each compare when sorting in DESC order in InterpretedOrdering.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, we'll create a new reverse comparator for each compare in InterpretedOrdering, which could generate lots of small and instant object and hurt JVM when there're plenty of data.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins.
Closes#27938 from Ngone51/reverse_comparator.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The meaning of 'u' was day number of the week in SimpleDateFormat, it was changed to year in DateTimeFormatter. Now we keep the old meaning of 'u' by substituting 'u' to 'e' internally and use DateTimeFormatter to parse the pattern string. In DateTimeFormatter, the 'e' and 'c' also represents day-of-week. e.g.
```sql
select date_format(timestamp '2019-10-06', 'yyyy-MM-dd uuuu');
select date_format(timestamp '2019-10-06', 'yyyy-MM-dd uuee');
select date_format(timestamp '2019-10-06', 'yyyy-MM-dd eeee');
```
Because of the substitution, they all goes to `.... eeee` silently. The users may congitive problems of their meanings, so we should mark them as illegal pattern characters to stay the same as before.
This pr move the method `convertIncompatiblePattern` from `DatetimeUtils` to `DateTimeFormatterHelper` object, since it is quite specific for `DateTimeFormatterHelper` class.
And 'e' and 'c' char checking in this method.
Besides,`convertIncompatiblePattern` has a bug that will lose the last `'` if it ends with it, this pr fixes this too. e.g.
```sql
spark-sql> select date_format(timestamp "2019-10-06", "yyyy-MM-dd'S'");
20/03/18 11:19:45 ERROR SparkSQLDriver: Failed in [select date_format(timestamp "2019-10-06", "yyyy-MM-dd'S'")]
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Pattern ends with an incomplete string literal: uuuu-MM-dd'S
spark-sql> select to_timestamp("2019-10-06S", "yyyy-MM-dd'S'");
NULL
```
### Why are the changes needed?
avoid vagueness
bug fix
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no, these are not exposed yet
### How was this patch tested?
add ut
Closes#27939 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31176.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```
<extract expression> ::= EXTRACT <left paren> <extract field> FROM <extract source> <right paren>
<extract source> ::= <datetime value expression> | <interval value expression>
```
We now only support datetime values as extract source for `extract` expression but it's alternative function `date_part` supports both datetime and interval.
This pr adds interval value support for `extract` expression as extract source
### Why are the changes needed?
For ANSI compliance and the semantic consistency between extract and `date_part`, we support intervals for extract expressions.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, in the `extract(abc from xyz)` expression, the `xyz` can be intervals
### How was this patch tested?
add unit tests
Closes#27876 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31119.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make `size(null)` return null under ANSI mode, regardless of the `spark.sql.legacy.sizeOfNull` config.
### Why are the changes needed?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27834, we change the result of `size(null)` to be -1 to match the 2.4 behavior and avoid breaking changes.
However, it's true that the "return -1" behavior is error-prone when being used with aggregate functions. The current ANSI mode controls a bunch of "better behaviors" like failing on overflow. We don't enable these "better behaviors" by default because they are too breaking. The "return null" behavior of `size(null)` is a good fit of the ANSI mode.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No as ANSI mode is off by default.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#27936 from cloud-fan/null.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to support parsing timestamp values with variable length second fraction parts.
e.g. 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS[zzz]' can parse timestamp with 0~6 digit-length second fraction but fail >=7
```sql
select to_timestamp(v, 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS[zzz]') from values
('2019-10-06 10:11:12.'),
('2019-10-06 10:11:12.0'),
('2019-10-06 10:11:12.1'),
('2019-10-06 10:11:12.12'),
('2019-10-06 10:11:12.123UTC'),
('2019-10-06 10:11:12.1234'),
('2019-10-06 10:11:12.12345CST'),
('2019-10-06 10:11:12.123456PST') t(v)
2019-10-06 03:11:12.123
2019-10-06 08:11:12.12345
2019-10-06 10:11:12
2019-10-06 10:11:12
2019-10-06 10:11:12.1
2019-10-06 10:11:12.12
2019-10-06 10:11:12.1234
2019-10-06 10:11:12.123456
select to_timestamp('2019-10-06 10:11:12.1234567PST', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS[zzz]')
NULL
```
Since 3.0, we use java 8 time API to parse and format timestamp values. when we create the `DateTimeFormatter`, we use `appendPattern` to create the build first, where the 'S..S' part will be parsed to a fixed-length(= `'S..S'.length`). This fits the formatting part but too strict for the parsing part because the trailing zeros are very likely to be truncated.
### Why are the changes needed?
improve timestamp parsing and more compatible with 2.4.x
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no, the related changes are newly added
### How was this patch tested?
add uts
Closes#27906 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31150.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27542, `map()` returns `map<null, null>` instead of `map<string, string>`. However, this breaks queries which union `map()` and other maps.
The reason is, `TypeCoercion` rules and `Cast` think it's illegal to cast null type map key to other types, as it makes the key nullable, but it's actually legal. This PR fixes it.
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid breaking queries.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now some queries that work in 2.x can work in 3.0 as well.
### How was this patch tested?
new test
Closes#27926 from cloud-fan/bug.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is kind of a followup of #26808. It leverages the helper method for aliasing in built-in SQL expressions to use the alias as its output column name where it's applicable.
- `Expression`, `UnaryMathExpression` and `BinaryMathExpression` search the alias in the tags by default.
- When the naming is different in its implementation, it has to be overwritten for the expression specifically. E.g., `CallMethodViaReflection`, `Remainder`, `CurrentTimestamp`,
`FormatString` and `XPathDouble`.
This PR fixes the aliases of the functions below:
| class | alias |
|--------------------------|------------------|
|`Rand` |`random` |
|`Ceil` |`ceiling` |
|`Remainder` |`mod` |
|`Pow` |`pow` |
|`Signum` |`sign` |
|`Chr` |`char` |
|`Length` |`char_length` |
|`Length` |`character_length`|
|`FormatString` |`printf` |
|`Substring` |`substr` |
|`Upper` |`ucase` |
|`XPathDouble` |`xpath_number` |
|`DayOfMonth` |`day` |
|`CurrentTimestamp` |`now` |
|`Size` |`cardinality` |
|`Sha1` |`sha` |
|`CallMethodViaReflection` |`java_method` |
Note: `EqualTo`, `=` and `==` aliases were excluded because it's unable to leverage this helper method. It should fix the parser.
Note: this PR also excludes some instances such as `ToDegrees`, `ToRadians`, `UnaryMinus` and `UnaryPositive` that needs an explicit name overwritten to make the scope of this PR smaller.
### Why are the changes needed?
To respect expression name.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, it will change the output column name.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, and unittests were added.
Closes#27901 from HyukjinKwon/31146.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's not needed at all as now we replace "y" with "u" if there is no "G". So the era is either explicitly specified (e.g. "yyyy G") or can be inferred from the year (e.g. "uuuu").
### Why are the changes needed?
By default we use "uuuu" as the year pattern, which indicates the era already. If we set a default era, it can get conflicted and fail the parsing.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yea, now spark can parse date/timestamp with negative year via the "yyyy" pattern, which will be converted to "uuuu" under the hood.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#27707 from cloud-fan/bug.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit 47d6e80a2e.
### Why are the changes needed?
There is no standard requiring that `div` must return the type of the operand, and always returning long type looks fine. This is kind of a cosmetic change and we should avoid it if it breaks existing queries. This is similar to reverting TRIM function parameter order change.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, change the behavior of `div` back to be the same as 2.4.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27835 from cloud-fan/revert2.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled should be removed from SQLConf and the migration guide
spark.sql.legacy.timeParsePolicy is the right one
### Why are the changes needed?
fix doc
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the jenkins
Closes#27889 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31131.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AQE has a perf regression when using the default settings: if we coalesce the shuffle partitions into one or few partitions, we may leave many CPU cores idle and the perf is worse than with AQE off (which leverages all CPU cores).
Technically, this is not a bad thing. If there are many queries running at the same time, it's better to coalesce shuffle partitions into fewer partitions. However, the default settings of AQE should try to avoid any perf regression as possible as we can.
This PR changes the default value of minPartitionNum when coalescing shuffle partitions, to be `SparkContext.defaultParallelism`, so that AQE can leverage all the CPU cores.
### Why are the changes needed?
avoid AQE perf regression
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27879 from cloud-fan/aqe.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the error message, adding an example for typed Scala UDF.
### Why are the changes needed?
Help user to know how to migrate to typed Scala UDF.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, it's a new error message in Spark 3.0.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins.
Closes#27884 from Ngone51/spark_31010_followup.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR reverts https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26051 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26066
### Why are the changes needed?
There is no standard requiring that `size(null)` must return null, and returning -1 looks reasonable as well. This is kind of a cosmetic change and we should avoid it if it breaks existing queries. This is similar to reverting TRIM function parameter order change.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, change the behavior of `size(null)` back to be the same as 2.4.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27834 from cloud-fan/revert.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`DateTimeUtilsSuite.daysToMicros and microsToDays` takes 30 seconds, which is too long for a UT.
This PR changes the test to check random data, to reduce testing time. Now this test takes 1 second.
### Why are the changes needed?
make test faster
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27873 from cloud-fan/test.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to change conversion of java.sql.Timestamp/Date values to/from internal values of Catalyst's TimestampType/DateType before cutover day `1582-10-15` of Gregorian calendar. I propose to construct local date-time from microseconds/days since the epoch. Take each date-time component `year`, `month`, `day`, `hour`, `minute`, `second` and `second fraction`, and construct java.sql.Timestamp/Date using the extracted components.
### Why are the changes needed?
This will rebase underlying time/date offset in the way that collected java.sql.Timestamp/Date values will have the same local time-date component as the original values in Gregorian calendar.
Here is the example which demonstrates the issue:
```sql
scala> sql("select date '1100-10-10'").collect()
res1: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([1100-10-03])
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, after the changes:
```sql
scala> sql("select date '1100-10-10'").collect()
res0: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([1100-10-10])
```
### How was this patch tested?
By running `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `DateFunctionsSuite` and `DateExpressionsSuite`.
Closes#27807 from MaxGekk/rebase-timestamp-before-1582.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When encoding Java Beans to Spark DataFrame, respecting `javax.annotation.Nonnull` and producing non-null fields.
### Why are the changes needed?
When encoding Java Beans to Spark DataFrame, non-primitive types are encoded as nullable fields. Although It works for most cases, it can be an issue under a few situations, e.g. the one described in the JIRA ticket when saving DataFrame to Avro format with non-null field.
We should allow Spark users more flexibility when creating Spark DataFrame from Java Beans. Currently, Spark users cannot create DataFrame with non-nullable fields in the schema from beans with non-nullable properties.
Although it is possible to project top-level columns with SQL expressions like `AssertNotNull` to make it non-null, for nested fields it is more tricky to do it similarly.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. After this change, Spark users can use `javax.annotation.Nonnull` to annotate non-null fields in Java Beans when encoding beans to Spark DataFrame.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.
Closes#27851 from viirya/SPARK-31071.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark version 2.4 and earlier, datetime parsing, formatting and conversion are performed by using the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian).
Since the Proleptic Gregorian calendar is de-facto calendar worldwide, as well as the chosen one in ANSI SQL standard, Spark 3.0 switches to it by using Java 8 API classes (the java.time packages that are based on ISO chronology ). The switching job is completed in SPARK-26651.
But after the switching, there are some patterns not compatible between Java 8 and Java 7, Spark needs its own definition on the patterns rather than depends on Java API.
In this PR, we achieve this by writing the document and shadow the incompatible letters. See more details in [SPARK-31030](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31030)
### Why are the changes needed?
For backward compatibility.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
After we define our own datetime parsing and formatting patterns, it's same to old Spark version.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing and new added UT.
Locally document test:
Closes#27830 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-31030.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we parse interval from multi units strings or from date-time/year-month pattern strings, the former handles all whitespace, the latter not or even spaces.
### Why are the changes needed?
behavior consistency
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, interval in date-time/year-month like
```
select interval '\n-\t10\t 12:34:46.789\t' day to second
-- !query 126 schema
struct<INTERVAL '-10 days -12 hours -34 minutes -46.789 seconds':interval>
-- !query 126 output
-10 days -12 hours -34 minutes -46.789 seconds
```
is valid now.
### How was this patch tested?
add ut.
Closes#26815 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30189.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
RuleExecutor already support metering for analyzer/optimizer rules. By providing such information in `PlanChangeLogger`, user can get more information when debugging rule changes .
This PR enhanced `PlanChangeLogger` to display RuleExecutor metrics. This can be easily done by calling the existing API `resetMetrics` and `dumpTimeSpent`, but there might be conflicts if user is also collecting total metrics of a sql job. Thus I introduced `QueryExecutionMetrics`, as the snapshot of `QueryExecutionMetering`, to better support this feature.
Information added to `PlanChangeLogger`
```
=== Metrics of Executed Rules ===
Total number of runs: 554
Total time: 0.107756568 seconds
Total number of effective runs: 11
Total time of effective runs: 0.047615486 seconds
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Provide better plan change debugging user experience
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Only add more debugging info of `planChangeLog`, default log level is TRACE.
### How was this patch tested?
Update existing tests to verify the new logs
Closes#27846 from Eric5553/ExplainRuleExecMetrics.
Authored-by: Eric Wu <492960551@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes two things:
1. Convert `null` to `string` type during schema inference of `schema_of_json` as JSON datasource does. This is a bug fix as well because `null` string is not the proper DDL formatted string and it is unable for SQL parser to recognise it as a type string. We should match it to JSON datasource and return a string type so `schema_of_json` returns a proper DDL formatted string.
2. Let `schema_of_json` respect `dropFieldIfAllNull` option during schema inference.
### Why are the changes needed?
To let `schema_of_json` return a proper DDL formatted string, and respect `dropFieldIfAllNull` option.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, it does.
```scala
import collection.JavaConverters._
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
spark.range(1).select(schema_of_json(lit("""{"id": ""}"""))).show()
spark.range(1).select(schema_of_json(lit("""{"id": "a", "drop": {"drop": null}}"""), Map("dropFieldIfAllNull" -> "true").asJava)).show(false)
```
**Before:**
```
struct<id:null>
struct<drop:struct<drop:null>,id:string>
```
**After:**
```
struct<id:string>
struct<id:string>
```
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, and unittests were added.
Closes#27854 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31065.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow up for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27650 where allow None provider for create table. Here we are doing the same thing for ReplaceTable.
### Why are the changes needed?
Although currently the ASTBuilder doesn't seem to allow `replace` without `USING` clause. This would allow `DataFrameWriterV2` to use the statements instead of commands directly.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#27838 from yuchenhuo/SPARK-30902.
Authored-by: Yuchen Huo <yuchen.huo@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The newly added catalog APIs are marked as Experimental but other DS v2 APIs are marked as Evolving.
This PR makes it consistent and mark all Connector APIs as Evolving.
### Why are the changes needed?
For consistency.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27811 from cloud-fan/tag.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Introduced a new parameter `emptyCollection` for `CreateMap` and `CreateArray` functiion to remove dependency on SQLConf.get.
### Why are the changes needed?
This allows to avoid the issue when the configuration change between different phases of planning, and this can silently break a query plan which can lead to crashes or data corruption.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Closes#27657 from iRakson/SPARK-30899.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr intends to support 32 or more grouping attributes for GROUPING_ID. In the current master, an integer overflow can occur to compute grouping IDs;
e75d9afb2f/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala (L613)
For example, the query below generates wrong grouping IDs in the master;
```
scala> val numCols = 32 // or, 31
scala> val cols = (0 until numCols).map { i => s"c$i" }
scala> sql(s"create table test_$numCols (${cols.map(c => s"$c int").mkString(",")}, v int) using parquet")
scala> val insertVals = (0 until numCols).map { _ => 1 }.mkString(",")
scala> sql(s"insert into test_$numCols values ($insertVals,3)")
scala> sql(s"select grouping_id(), sum(v) from test_$numCols group by grouping sets ((${cols.mkString(",")}), (${cols.init.mkString(",")}))").show(10, false)
scala> sql(s"drop table test_$numCols")
// numCols = 32
+-------------+------+
|grouping_id()|sum(v)|
+-------------+------+
|0 |3 |
|0 |3 | // Wrong Grouping ID
+-------------+------+
// numCols = 31
+-------------+------+
|grouping_id()|sum(v)|
+-------------+------+
|0 |3 |
|1 |3 |
+-------------+------+
```
To fix this issue, this pr change code to use long values for `GROUPING_ID` instead of int values.
### Why are the changes needed?
To support more cases in `GROUPING_ID`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Closes#26918 from maropu/FixGroupingIdIssue.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose:
1. To replace matching by `Literal` in `ExprUtils.evalSchemaExpr()` to checking foldable property of the `schema` expression.
2. To replace matching by `Literal` in `ExprUtils.evalTypeExpr()` to checking foldable property of the `schema` expression.
3. To change checking of the input parameter in the `SchemaOfCsv` expression, and allow foldable `child` expression.
4. To change checking of the input parameter in the `SchemaOfJson` expression, and allow foldable `child` expression.
### Why are the changes needed?
This should improve Spark SQL UX for `from_csv`/`from_json`. Currently, Spark expects only literals:
```sql
spark-sql> select from_csv('1,Moscow', replace('dpt_org_id INT, dpt_org_city STRING', 'dpt_org_', ''));
Error in query: Schema should be specified in DDL format as a string literal or output of the schema_of_csv function instead of replace('dpt_org_id INT, dpt_org_city STRING', 'dpt_org_', '');; line 1 pos 7
spark-sql> select from_json('{"id":1, "city":"Moscow"}', replace('dpt_org_id INT, dpt_org_city STRING', 'dpt_org_', ''));
Error in query: Schema should be specified in DDL format as a string literal or output of the schema_of_json function instead of replace('dpt_org_id INT, dpt_org_city STRING', 'dpt_org_', '');; line 1 pos 7
```
and only string literals are acceptable as CSV examples by `schema_of_csv`/`schema_of_json`:
```sql
spark-sql> select schema_of_csv(concat_ws(',', 0.1, 1));
Error in query: cannot resolve 'schema_of_csv(concat_ws(',', CAST(0.1BD AS STRING), CAST(1 AS STRING)))' due to data type mismatch: The input csv should be a string literal and not null; however, got concat_ws(',', CAST(0.1BD AS STRING), CAST(1 AS STRING)).; line 1 pos 7;
'Project [unresolvedalias(schema_of_csv(concat_ws(,, cast(0.1 as string), cast(1 as string))), None)]
+- OneRowRelation
spark-sql> select schema_of_json(regexp_replace('{"item_id": 1, "item_price": 0.1}', 'item_', ''));
Error in query: cannot resolve 'schema_of_json(regexp_replace('{"item_id": 1, "item_price": 0.1}', 'item_', ''))' due to data type mismatch: The input json should be a string literal and not null; however, got regexp_replace('{"item_id": 1, "item_price": 0.1}', 'item_', '').; line 1 pos 7;
'Project [unresolvedalias(schema_of_json(regexp_replace({"item_id": 1, "item_price": 0.1}, item_, )), None)]
+- OneRowRelation
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, after the changes users can pass any foldable string expression as the `schema` parameter to `from_csv()/from_json()`. For the example above:
```sql
spark-sql> select from_csv('1,Moscow', replace('dpt_org_id INT, dpt_org_city STRING', 'dpt_org_', ''));
{"id":1,"city":"Moscow"}
spark-sql> select from_json('{"id":1, "city":"Moscow"}', replace('dpt_org_id INT, dpt_org_city STRING', 'dpt_org_', ''));
{"id":1,"city":"Moscow"}
```
After change the `schema_of_csv`/`schema_of_json` functions accept foldable expressions, for example:
```sql
spark-sql> select schema_of_csv(concat_ws(',', 0.1, 1));
struct<_c0:double,_c1:int>
spark-sql> select schema_of_json(regexp_replace('{"item_id": 1, "item_price": 0.1}', 'item_', ''));
struct<id:bigint,price:double>
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new test to `CsvFunctionsSuite` and to `JsonFunctionsSuite`.
Closes#27804 from MaxGekk/foldable-arg-csv-json-func.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to show a deprecation warning on two-parameter TRIM/LTRIM/RTRIM function usages based on the community decision.
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r48b6c2596ab06206b7b7fd4bbafd4099dccd4e2cf9801aaa9034c418%40%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E
### Why are the changes needed?
For backward compatibility, SPARK-28093 is reverted. However, from Apache Spark 3.0.0, we should give a safe guideline to use SQL syntax instead of the esoteric function signatures.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. This shows a directional warning.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with a newly added test case.
Closes#27643 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-30886.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds an internal config for changing the logging level of adaptive execution query plan evolvement.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make AQE debugging easier.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Closes#27798 from maryannxue/aqe-log-level.
Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to respect hidden parameters by using `stringArgs` in `Expression.toString `. By this, we can show the strings properly in some cases such as `NonSQLExpression`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To respect "hidden" arguments in the string representation.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, for example, on the top of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27657,
```scala
val identify = udf((input: Seq[Int]) => input)
spark.range(10).select(identify(array("id"))).show()
```
shows hidden parameter `useStringTypeWhenEmpty`.
```
+---------------------+
|UDF(array(id, false))|
+---------------------+
| [0]|
| [1]|
...
```
whereas:
```scala
spark.range(10).select(array("id")).show()
```
```
+---------+
|array(id)|
+---------+
| [0]|
| [1]|
...
```
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested as below:
```scala
val identify = udf((input: Boolean) => input)
spark.range(10).select(identify(exists(array(col("id")), _ % 2 === 0))).show()
```
Before:
```
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|UDF(exists(array(id), lambdafunction(((lambda 'x % 2) = 0), lambda 'x, false), true))|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| true|
| false|
| true|
...
```
After:
```
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|UDF(exists(array(id), lambdafunction(((lambda 'x % 2) = 0), lambda 'x, false)))|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| true|
| false|
| true|
...
```
Closes#27788 from HyukjinKwon/arguments-str-repr.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are two implementation of quoteIfNeeded. One is in `org.apache.spark.sql.connector.catalog.CatalogV2Implicits.quote` and the other is in `OrcFiltersBase.quoteAttributeNameIfNeeded`. This PR will consolidate them into one.
### Why are the changes needed?
Simplify the codebase.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Closes#27814 from dbtsai/SPARK-31058.
Authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When introducing AQE to others, I feel the config names are a bit incoherent and hard to use.
This PR refines the config names:
1. remove the "shuffle" prefix. AQE is all about shuffle and we don't need to add the "shuffle" prefix everywhere.
2. `targetPostShuffleInputSize` is obscure, rename to `advisoryShufflePartitionSizeInBytes`.
3. `reducePostShufflePartitions` doesn't match the actual optimization, rename to `coalesceShufflePartitions`
4. `minNumPostShufflePartitions` is obscure, rename it `minPartitionNum` under the `coalesceShufflePartitions` namespace
5. `maxNumPostShufflePartitions` is confusing with the word "max", rename it `initialPartitionNum`
6. `skewedJoinOptimization` is too verbose. skew join is a well-known terminology in database area, we can just say `skewJoin`
### Why are the changes needed?
Make the config names easy to understand.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
deprecate the config `spark.sql.adaptive.shuffle.targetPostShuffleInputSize`
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#27793 from cloud-fan/aqe.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to change `DateTimeUtils.stringToTimestamp` to support any valid time zone id at the end of input string. After the changes, the function accepts zone ids in the formats:
- no zone id. In that case, the function uses the local session time zone from the SQL config `spark.sql.session.timeZone`
- -[h]h:[m]m
- +[h]h:[m]m
- Z
- Short zone id, see https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/time/ZoneId.html#SHORT_IDS
- Zone ID starts with 'UTC+', 'UTC-', 'GMT+', 'GMT-', 'UT+' or 'UT-'. The ID is split in two, with a two or three letter prefix and a suffix starting with the sign. The suffix must be in the formats:
- +|-h[h]
- +|-hh[:]mm
- +|-hh:mm:ss
- +|-hhmmss
- Region-based zone IDs in the form `{area}/{city}`, such as `Europe/Paris` or `America/New_York`. The default set of region ids is supplied by the IANA Time Zone Database (TZDB).
### Why are the changes needed?
- To use `stringToTimestamp` as a substitution of removed `stringToTime`, see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27710#discussion_r385020173
- Improve UX of Spark SQL by allowing flexible formats of zone ids. Currently, Spark accepts only `Z` and zone offsets that can be inconvenient when a time zone offset is shifted due to daylight saving rules. For instance:
```sql
spark-sql> select cast('2015-03-18T12:03:17.123456 Europe/Moscow' as timestamp);
NULL
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, casting strings to timestamps allows time zone id at the end of the strings:
```sql
spark-sql> select cast('2015-03-18T12:03:17.123456 Europe/Moscow' as timestamp);
2015-03-18 12:03:17.123456
```
### How was this patch tested?
- Added new test cases to the `string to timestamp` test in `DateTimeUtilsSuite`.
- Run `CastSuite` and `AnsiCastSuite`.
Closes#27753 from MaxGekk/stringToTimestamp-uni-zoneId.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
rename the config and make it non-internal.
### Why are the changes needed?
Now we fail the query if duplicated map keys are detected, and provide a legacy config to deduplicate it. However, we must provide a way to get users out of this situation, instead of just rejecting to run the query. This exit strategy should always be there, while legacy config indicates that it may be removed someday.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no, just rename a config which was added in 3.0
### How was this patch tested?
add more tests for the fail behavior.
Closes#27772 from cloud-fan/map.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `spark.sql.session.timeZone` config can accept any string value including invalid time zone ids, then it will fail other queries that rely on the time zone. We should do the value checking in the set phase and fail fast if the zone value is invalid.
### Why are the changes needed?
improve configuration
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, will fail fast if the value is a wrong timezone id
### How was this patch tested?
add ut
Closes#27792 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31038.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the user cannot specify the session catalog name (`spark_catalog`) in qualified column names for v1 tables:
```
SELECT spark_catalog.default.t.i FROM spark_catalog.default.t
```
fails with `cannot resolve 'spark_catalog.default.t.i`.
This is inconsistent with v2 table behavior where catalog name can be used:
```
SELECT testcat.ns1.tbl.id FROM testcat.ns1.tbl.id
```
This PR proposes to fix the inconsistency and allow the user to specify session catalog name in column names for v1 tables.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fixing an inconsistent behavior.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now the following query works:
```
SELECT spark_catalog.default.t.i FROM spark_catalog.default.t
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Closes#27776 from imback82/spark_catalog_col_name_resolution.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up work for #27441. For the cases of new TimestampFormatter return null while legacy formatter can return a value, we need to throw an exception instead of silent change. The legacy config will be referenced in the error message.
### Why are the changes needed?
Avoid silent result change for new behavior in 3.0.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, an exception is thrown when we detect legacy formatter can parse the string and the new formatter return null.
### How was this patch tested?
Extend existing UT.
Closes#27537 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-30668-follow.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are few V1 commands such as `REFRESH TABLE` that still allow `spark_catalog.t` because they run the commands with parsed table names without trying to load them in the catalog. This PR addresses this issue.
The PR also addresses the issue brought up in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27642#discussion_r382402104.
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a bug where for some V1 commands, `spark_catalog.t` is allowed.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, a bug is fixed and `REFRESH TABLE spark_catalog.t` is not allowed.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new test.
Closes#27718 from imback82/fix_TempViewOrV1Table.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before Spark 3.0, the JSON/CSV parser has a special behavior that, when the parser fails to parse a timestamp/date, fallback to another way to parse it, to support some legacy format. The fallback was removed by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26178 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26243.
This PR adds back this legacy fallback. Since we switch the API to do datetime operations, we can't be exactly the same as before. Here we add back the support of the legacy formats that are common (examples of Spark 2.4):
1. the fields can have one or two letters
```
scala> sql("""select from_json('{"time":"1123-2-22 2:22:22"}', 'time Timestamp')""").show(false)
+-------------------------------------------+
|jsontostructs({"time":"1123-2-22 2:22:22"})|
+-------------------------------------------+
|[1123-02-22 02:22:22] |
+-------------------------------------------+
```
2. the separator between data and time can be "T" as well
```
scala> sql("""select from_json('{"time":"2000-12-12T12:12:12"}', 'time Timestamp')""").show(false)
+---------------------------------------------+
|jsontostructs({"time":"2000-12-12T12:12:12"})|
+---------------------------------------------+
|[2000-12-12 12:12:12] |
+---------------------------------------------+
```
3. the second fraction can be arbitrary length
```
scala> sql("""select from_json('{"time":"1123-02-22T02:22:22.123456789123"}', 'time Timestamp')""").show(false)
+----------------------------------------------------------+
|jsontostructs({"time":"1123-02-22T02:22:22.123456789123"})|
+----------------------------------------------------------+
|[1123-02-15 02:22:22.123] |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
```
4. date string can end up with any chars after "T" or space
```
scala> sql("""select from_json('{"time":"1123-02-22Tabc"}', 'time date')""").show(false)
+----------------------------------------+
|jsontostructs({"time":"1123-02-22Tabc"})|
+----------------------------------------+
|[1123-02-22] |
+----------------------------------------+
```
5. remove "GMT" from the string before parsing
```
scala> sql("""select from_json('{"time":"GMT1123-2-22 2:22:22.123"}', 'time Timestamp')""").show(false)
+--------------------------------------------------+
|jsontostructs({"time":"GMT1123-2-22 2:22:22.123"})|
+--------------------------------------------------+
|[1123-02-22 02:22:22.123] |
+--------------------------------------------------+
```
### Why are the changes needed?
It doesn't hurt to keep this legacy support. It just makes the parsing more relaxed.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, to make 3.0 support parsing most of the csv/json values that were supported before.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#27710 from cloud-fan/bug2.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We have supported generators in SQL aggregate expressions by SPARK-28782.
But, the generator(explode) query with aggregate functions in DataFrame failed as follows;
```
// SPARK-28782: Generator support in aggregate expressions
scala> spark.range(3).toDF("id").createOrReplaceTempView("t")
scala> sql("select explode(array(min(id), max(id))) from t").show()
+---+
|col|
+---+
| 0|
| 2|
+---+
// A failure case handled in this pr
scala> spark.range(3).select(explode(array(min($"id"), max($"id")))).show()
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException:
The query operator `Generate` contains one or more unsupported
expression types Aggregate, Window or Generate.
Invalid expressions: [min(`id`), max(`id`)];;
Project [col#46L]
+- Generate explode(array(min(id#42L), max(id#42L))), false, [col#46L]
+- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4))
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.failAnalysis$(CheckAnalysis.scala:48)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:129)
```
The root cause is that `ExtractGenerator` wrongly replaces a project w/ aggregate functions
before `GlobalAggregates` replaces it with an aggregate as follows;
```
scala> sql("SET spark.sql.optimizer.planChangeLog.level=warn")
scala> spark.range(3).select(explode(array(min($"id"), max($"id")))).show()
20/03/01 12:51:58 WARN HiveSessionStateBuilder$$anon$1:
=== Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveReferences ===
!'Project [explode(array(min('id), max('id))) AS List()] 'Project [explode(array(min(id#72L), max(id#72L))) AS List()]
+- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4)) +- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4))
20/03/01 12:51:58 WARN HiveSessionStateBuilder$$anon$1:
=== Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ExtractGenerator ===
!'Project [explode(array(min(id#72L), max(id#72L))) AS List()] Project [col#76L]
!+- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4)) +- Generate explode(array(min(id#72L), max(id#72L))), false, [col#76L]
! +- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4))
20/03/01 12:51:58 WARN HiveSessionStateBuilder$$anon$1:
=== Result of Batch Resolution ===
!'Project [explode(array(min('id), max('id))) AS List()] Project [col#76L]
!+- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4)) +- Generate explode(array(min(id#72L), max(id#72L))), false, [col#76L]
! +- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4))
// the analysis failed here...
```
To avoid the case in `ExtractGenerator`, this pr addes a condition to ignore generators having aggregate functions.
A correct sequence of rules is as follows;
```
20/03/01 13:19:06 WARN HiveSessionStateBuilder$$anon$1:
=== Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveReferences ===
!'Project [explode(array(min('id), max('id))) AS List()] 'Project [explode(array(min(id#27L), max(id#27L))) AS List()]
+- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4)) +- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4))
20/03/01 13:19:06 WARN HiveSessionStateBuilder$$anon$1:
=== Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$GlobalAggregates ===
!'Project [explode(array(min(id#27L), max(id#27L))) AS List()] 'Aggregate [explode(array(min(id#27L), max(id#27L))) AS List()]
+- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4)) +- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4))
20/03/01 13:19:06 WARN HiveSessionStateBuilder$$anon$1:
=== Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ExtractGenerator ===
!'Aggregate [explode(array(min(id#27L), max(id#27L))) AS List()] 'Project [explode(_gen_input_0#31) AS List()]
!+- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4)) +- Aggregate [array(min(id#27L), max(id#27L)) AS _gen_input_0#31]
! +- Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(4))
```
### Why are the changes needed?
A bug fix.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#27749 from maropu/ExplodeInAggregate.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For a v2 table created with `CREATE TABLE testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl (id bigint, name string) USING foo`, the following works as expected
```
SELECT testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl.id FROM testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl
```
, but a query with qualified column name with star(*)
```
SELECT testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl.* FROM testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl
[info] org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl.*' given input columns 'id, name';
```
fails to resolve. And this PR proposes to fix this issue.
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a bug as describe above.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now `SELECT testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl.* FROM testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl` works as expected.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new test.
Closes#27766 from imback82/fix_star_expression.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A query below failed in the master;
```
scala> sql("select array(array(1, 2), array(3)) ar").select(explode(explode($"ar"))).show()
20/03/01 13:51:56 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 0.0 in stage 0.0 (TID 0)/ 1]
java.lang.ClassCastException: scala.collection.mutable.ArrayOps$ofRef cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.ArrayData
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ExplodeBase.eval(generators.scala:313)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.GenerateExec.$anonfun$doExecute$8(GenerateExec.scala:108)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.nextCur(Iterator.scala:484)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:490)
at scala.collection.Iterator$ConcatIterator.hasNext(Iterator.scala:222)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$10.hasNext(Iterator.scala:458)
...
```
This pr modified the `hasNestedGenerator` code in `ExtractGenerator` for correctly catching nested inner generators.
### Why are the changes needed?
A bug fix.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#27750 from maropu/HandleNestedGenerators.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes several incorrect uses of `assume()` in our tests.
If a call to `assume(condition)` fails then it will cause the test to be marked as skipped instead of failed: this feature allows test cases to be skipped if certain prerequisites are missing. For example, we use this to skip certain tests when running on Windows (or when Python dependencies are unavailable).
In contrast, `assert(condition)` will fail the test if the condition doesn't hold.
If `assume()` is accidentally substituted for `assert()`then the resulting test will be marked as skipped in cases where it should have failed, undermining the purpose of the test.
This patch fixes several such cases, replacing certain `assume()` calls with `assert()`.
Credit to ahirreddy for spotting this problem.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#27754 from JoshRosen/fix-assume-vs-assert.
Lead-authored-by: Josh Rosen <rosenville@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes the bug of UnsafeRow which misses to handle the UDT specifically, in `isFixedLength` and `isMutable`. These methods don't check its SQL type for UDT, always treating UDT as variable-length, and non-mutable.
It doesn't bring any issue if UDT is used to represent complicated type, but when UDT is used to represent some type which is matched with fixed length of SQL type, it exposes the chance of correctness issues, as these informations sometimes decide how the value should be handled.
We got report from user mailing list which suspected as mapGroupsWithState looks like handling UDT incorrectly, but after some investigation it was from GenerateUnsafeRowJoiner in shuffle phase.
0e2ca11d80/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateUnsafeRowJoiner.scala (L32-L43)
Here updating position should not happen on fixed-length column, but due to this bug, the value of UDT having fixed-length as sql type would be modified, which actually corrupts the value.
### Why are the changes needed?
Misclassifying of the type of length for UDT can corrupt the value when the row is presented to the input of GenerateUnsafeRowJoiner, which brings correctness issue.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.
Closes#27747 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-30993.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Rename `spark.sql.legacy.addDirectory.recursive.enabled` to `spark.sql.legacy.addSingleFileInAddFile`
### Why are the changes needed?
To follow the naming convention
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Closes#27725 from iRakson/SPARK-30234_CONFIG.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Renamed configuration from `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` to `spark.sql.legacy.allowHashOnMapType`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Better readability of configuration.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Closes#27719 from iRakson/SPARK-27619_FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When `CREATE TABLE` SQL statement does not specify the provider, leave it to the catalog implementations to decide.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's super weird if we set the default provider to parquet when creating a table in a JDBC catalog.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, v2 catalog will not see a "provider" property in table properties if it's not specified in `CREATE TABLE` SQL statement. V2 catalog is new in 3.0.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#27650 from cloud-fan/create_table.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When aliasing in nested column pruning in Project on top of Generate, we should exclude Generate outputs.
### Why are the changes needed?
Right now we would prune nested columns in Project on top of Generate. It is possible that referred nested columns are from Generate's outputs, not from its child. To address that case, we should exclude Generate outputs when aliasing in nested column pruning.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#27702 from viirya/fix-nested-pruning.
Lead-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <liangchi@uber.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this PR, I addressed the comment from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27672#discussion_r383719562 to use `intercept` instead of `try-catch` block to assert failures in the IntervalUtilsSuite
### Why are the changes needed?
improve tests
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
Nah
Closes#27700 from yaooqinn/intervaltest.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR follows https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25074 and improves the implement.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve code.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Exists UT
Closes#27699 from beliefer/improve-boolean-test.
Authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`hash()` and `xxhash64()` cannot be used on elements of `Maptype`. A new configuration `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is introduced to allow users to restore the previous behaviour.
When `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is set to false:
```
scala> spark.sql("select hash(map())");
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'hash(map())' due to data type mismatch: input to function hash cannot contain elements of MapType; line 1 pos 7;
'Project [unresolvedalias(hash(map(), 42), None)]
+- OneRowRelation
```
when `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` is set to true :
```
scala> spark.sql("set spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType=true");
res3: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [key: string, value: string]
scala> spark.sql("select hash(map())").first()
res4: org.apache.spark.sql.Row = [42]
```
### Why are the changes needed?
As discussed in Jira, SparkSql's map hashcodes depends on their order of insertion which is not consistent with the normal scala behaviour which might confuse users.
Code snippet from JIRA :
```
val a = spark.createDataset(Map(1->1, 2->2) :: Nil)
val b = spark.createDataset(Map(2->2, 1->1) :: Nil)
// Demonstration of how Scala Map equality is unaffected by insertion order:
assert(Map(1->1, 2->2).hashCode() == Map(2->2, 1->1).hashCode())
assert(Map(1->1, 2->2) == Map(2->2, 1->1))
assert(a.first() == b.first())
// In contrast, this will print two different hashcodes:
println(Seq(a, b).map(_.selectExpr("hash(*)").first()))
```
Also `MapType` is prohibited for aggregation / joins / equality comparisons #7819 and set operations #17236.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now users cannot use hash functions on elements of `mapType`. To restore the previous behaviour set `spark.sql.legacy.useHashOnMapType` to true.
### How was this patch tested?
UT added.
Closes#27580 from iRakson/SPARK-27619.
Authored-by: iRakson <raksonrakesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix an issue where qualified columns are not matched for v2 tables if current catalog/namespace are used.
For v1 tables, you can currently perform the following:
```SQL
SELECT default.t.id FROM t;
```
For v2 tables, the following fails:
```SQL
USE testcat.ns1.ns2;
SELECT testcat.ns1.ns2.t.id FROM t;
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '`testcat.ns1.ns2.t.id`' given input columns: [t.id, t.point]; line 1 pos 7;
```
### Why are the changes needed?
It is a bug since qualified column names cannot match if current catalog/namespace are used.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now the following works:
```SQL
USE testcat.ns1.ns2;
SELECT testcat.ns1.ns2.t.id FROM t;
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests
Closes#27532 from imback82/qualifed_col_respect_current.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use the average size of the non-skewed partitions as the target size when splitting skewed partitions, instead of ADAPTIVE_EXECUTION_SKEWED_PARTITION_SIZE_THRESHOLD
### Why are the changes needed?
The goal of skew join optimization is to make the data distribution move even. So it makes more sense the use the average size of the non-skewed partitions as the target size.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#27669 from cloud-fan/aqe.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to replace:
1. `millisToDays()` by `microsToDays()` which accepts microseconds since the epoch and returns days since the epoch in the specified time zone. The last one is the internal representation of Catalyst's DateType.
2. `daysToMillis()` by `daysToMicros()` which accepts days since the epoch in some time zone and returns the number of microseconds since the epoch. The last one is internal representation of Catalyst's TimestampType.
3. `fromMillis()` by `millisToMicros()`
4. `toMillis()` by `microsToMillis()`
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark stores timestamps in microseconds precision, so, there is no actual need to convert dates to milliseconds, and then to microseconds. As examples, look at DateTimeUtils functions `monthsBetween()` and `truncTimestamp()`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites UnivocityParserSuite, DateExpressionsSuite, ComputeCurrentTimeSuite, DateTimeUtilsSuite, DateFunctionsSuite, JsonSuite, StreamSuite.
Closes#27618 from MaxGekk/replace-millis-by-micros.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current behavior of interval multiply and divide follows the ANSI SQL standard when overflow, it is compatible with other operations when `spark.sql.ansi.enabled` is true, but not compatible when `spark.sql.ansi.enabled` is false.
When `spark.sql.ansi.enabled` is false, as the factor is a double value, so it should use java's rounding or truncation behavior for casting double to integrals. when divided by zero, it returns `null`. we also follow the natural rules for intervals as defined in the Gregorian calendar, so we do not add the month fraction to days but add days fraction to microseconds.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make interval multiply and divide's overflow behavior consistent with other interval operations
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no, these are new features in 3.0
### How was this patch tested?
add uts
Closes#27672 from yaooqinn/SPARK-30919.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes a bug in nested column aliasing by taking the data type of the referenced nested fields into account when calculating the number of extracted columns. After this PR this query runs without issues:
```
SELECT explodedvalue.*
FROM VALUES array(named_struct('nested', named_struct('a', 1, 'b', 2))) AS (value)
LATERAL VIEW explode(value) AS explodedvalue
```
This is a regression from Spark 2.4.
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a bug.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new UT.
Closes#27675 from peter-toth/SPARK-30870.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new `nullOnOverflow` parameter to `MakeDecimal` so as to avoid its value depending on `SQLConf.get` and change during planning.
### Why are the changes needed?
This allows to avoid the issue when the configuration change between different phases of planning, and this can silently break a query plan which can lead to crashes or data corruption.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Closes#27656 from peter-toth/SPARK-30898.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new `followThreeValuedLogic` parameter to `ArrayExists` so as to avoid its value depending on `SQLConf.get` and change during planning.
### Why are the changes needed?
This allows to avoid the issue when the configuration change between different phases of planning, and this can silently break a query plan which can lead to crashes or data corruption.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Closes#27655 from peter-toth/SPARK-30897.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
