### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix descriptions of the SQL configs `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.int96RebaseModeInRead` and `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.int96RebaseModeInWrite`, and mention `EXCEPTION` as the default value.
### Why are the changes needed?
This fixes incorrect descriptions that can mislead users.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running `./dev/scalastyle`.
Closes#31557 from MaxGekk/int96-exception-by-default-followup.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify `RandomDataGenerator.forType()` to allow generation of dates/timestamps that are valid in both Julian and Proleptic Gregorian calendars. Currently, the function can produce a date (for example `1582-10-06`) which is valid in the Proleptic Gregorian calendar. Though it cannot be saved to ORC files AS IS since ORC format (ORC libs in fact) assumes Julian calendar. So, Spark shifts `1582-10-06` to the next valid date `1582-10-15` while saving it to ORC files. And as a consequence of that, the test fails because it compares original date `1582-10-06` and the date `1582-10-15` loaded back from the ORC files.
In this PR, I propose to generate valid dates/timestamps in both calendars for ORC datasource till SPARK-34440 is resolved.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix failures of `HiveOrcHadoopFsRelationSuite`. For instance, the test "test all data types" fails with the seed **610710213676**:
```
== Results ==
!== Correct Answer - 20 == == Spark Answer - 20 ==
struct<index:int,col:date> struct<index:int,col:date>
...
![9,1582-10-06] [9,1582-10-15]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suite:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *HiveOrcHadoopFsRelationSuite"
```
Closes#31552 from MaxGekk/fix-HiveOrcHadoopFsRelationSuite.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Lazily load Hive's configuration properties from `hive-site.xml` only once.
### Why are the changes needed?
It is expensive to parse the same file over and over.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Should not. The changes can improve performance slightly.
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites such as `SparkContextSuite`.
Closes#31556 from MaxGekk/load-hive-site-once.
Authored-by: herman <herman@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Mention the DS options introduced by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31529 and by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31489 in `SparkUpgradeException`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve user experience with Spark SQL. Before the changes, the error message recommends to set SQL configs but the configs cannot help in the some situations (see the PRs for more details).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, the error message is:
_org.apache.spark.SparkUpgradeException: You may get a different result due to the upgrading of Spark 3.0: reading dates before 1582-10-15 or timestamps before 1900-01-01T00:00:00Z from Parquet files can be ambiguous, as the files may be written by Spark 2.x or legacy versions of Hive, which uses a legacy hybrid calendar that is different from Spark 3.0+'s Proleptic Gregorian calendar. See more details in SPARK-31404. You can set the SQL config 'spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead' or the datasource option 'datetimeRebaseMode' to 'LEGACY' to rebase the datetime values w.r.t. the calendar difference during reading. To read the datetime values as it is, set the SQL config 'spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead' or the datasource option 'datetimeRebaseMode' to 'CORRECTED'._
### How was this patch tested?
1. By checking coding style: `./dev/scalastyle`
2. By running the related test suite:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *ParquetRebaseDatetimeV1Suite"
```
Closes#31562 from MaxGekk/rebase-upgrade-exception.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added option to provide Avro schema by URL.
### Why are the changes needed?
(copied from Jira ticket)
We have a use case in which we read a huge table in Avro format. About 30k columns.
using the default Hive reader - `AvroGenericRecordReader` it is just hangs forever. after 4 hours not even one task has finished.
We tried instead to use `spark.read.format("com.databricks.spark.avro").load(..)` but we failed on:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Found duplicate column(s) in the data schema
..
at org.apache.spark.sql.util.SchemaUtils$.checkColumnNameDuplication(SchemaUtils.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.util.SchemaUtils$.checkColumnNameDuplication(SchemaUtils.scala:67)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSource.resolveRelation(DataSource.scala:421)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameReader.loadV1Source(DataFrameReader.scala:239)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameReader.load(DataFrameReader.scala:227)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameReader.load(DataFrameReader.scala:174)
... 53 elided
```
because files schema contain duplicate column names (when considering case-insensitive).
So we wanted to provide a user schema with non-duplicated fields, but the schema is huge. a few MBs. it is not practical to provide it in json format.
So we patched spark-avro to be able to get also `avroSchemaUrl` in addition to `avroSchema` and it worked perfectly.
### How was this patch tested?
added a unitest to AvroSuite and tested locally with patched version
Closes#31543 from uzadude/avro_schema.
Authored-by: oraviv <oraviv@paypal.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to update the sbt version to 1.4.7.
### Why are the changes needed?
This will bring the latest bug fixes and improvements.
- https://github.com/sbt/sbt/releases/tag/v1.4.7
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Closes#31555 from williamhyun/sbt147.
Authored-by: William Hyun <williamhyun3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to support `ifExists` flag for v2 `ALTER TABLE ... UNSET TBLPROPERTIES` command. Currently, the flag is not respected and the command behaves as `ifExists = true` where the command always succeeds when the properties do not exist.
### Why are the changes needed?
To support `ifExists` flag and align with v1 command behavior.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now if the property does not exist and `IF EXISTS` is not specified, the command will fail:
```
ALTER TABLE t UNSET TBLPROPERTIES ('unknown') // Fails with "Attempted to unset non-existent property 'unknown'"
ALTER TABLE t UNSET TBLPROPERTIES IF EXISTS ('unknown') // OK
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new test
Closes#31494 from imback82/AlterTableUnsetPropertiesIfExists.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a test and modify an existing one to check that partitions still exist after v1 `TRUNCATE TABLE`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running new test:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *TruncateTableSuite"
```
Closes#31544 from MaxGekk/test-truncate-partitioned-table.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to throw exception if non-streaming `Deduplicate` is not replaced by aggregate in query planner.
### Why are the changes needed?
We replace some operations in the query optimizer. For them we throw some exceptions accordingly in query planner if these logical nodes are not replaced. But `Deduplicate` is missing and it opens a possible hole. For code consistency and to prevent possible unexpected query planning error, we should add similar exception case to query planner.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#31547 from viirya/minor-deduplicate.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use `_create_udf` where we need to create `UserDefinedFunction` to maintain codes easier.
### Why are the changes needed?
For the better readability of codes and maintenance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, refactoring.
### How was this patch tested?
Ran the existing unittests. CI in this PR should test it out too.
Closes#31537 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34408.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move `PartitionTransforms.scala` from `sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions` to `sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We should put java/scala files to their corresponding directories.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#31546 from sunchao/SPARK-34419.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Creating a Pandas dataframe via Apache Arrow currently can use twice as much memory as the final result, because during the conversion, both Pandas and Arrow retain a copy of the data. Arrow has a "self-destruct" mode now (Arrow >= 0.16) to avoid this, by freeing each column after conversion. This PR integrates support for this in toPandas, handling a couple of edge cases:
self_destruct has no effect unless the memory is allocated appropriately, which is handled in the Arrow serializer here. Essentially, the issue is that self_destruct frees memory column-wise, but Arrow record batches are oriented row-wise:
```
Record batch 0: allocation 0: column 0 chunk 0, column 1 chunk 0, ...
Record batch 1: allocation 1: column 0 chunk 1, column 1 chunk 1, ...
```
In this scenario, Arrow will drop references to all of column 0's chunks, but no memory will actually be freed, as the chunks were just slices of an underlying allocation. The PR copies each column into its own allocation so that memory is instead arranged as so:
```
Record batch 0: allocation 0 column 0 chunk 0, allocation 1 column 1 chunk 0, ...
Record batch 1: allocation 2 column 0 chunk 1, allocation 3 column 1 chunk 1, ...
```
The optimization is disabled by default, and can be enabled with the Spark SQL conf "spark.sql.execution.arrow.pyspark.selfDestruct.enabled" set to "true". We can't always apply this optimization because it's more likely to generate a dataframe with immutable buffers, which Pandas doesn't always handle well, and because it is slower overall (since it only converts one column at a time instead of in parallel).
### Why are the changes needed?
This lets us load larger datasets - in particular, with N bytes of memory, before we could never load a dataset bigger than N/2 bytes; now the overhead is more like N/1.25 or so.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes - it adds a new SQL conf "spark.sql.execution.arrow.pyspark.selfDestruct.enabled"
### How was this patch tested?
See the [mailing list](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Reducing-memory-usage-of-toPandas-with-Arrow-quot-self-destruct-quot-option-td30149.html) - it was tested with Python memory_profiler. Unit tests added to check memory within certain bounds and correctness with the option enabled.
Closes#29818 from lidavidm/spark-32953.
Authored-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`TreeNodeException` causes the error msg not clear and it didn't work well.
Because the `TreeNodeException` looks redundancy, we could remove it.
There are show a case:
```
val df = Seq(("1", 1), ("1", 2), ("2", 3), ("2", 4)).toDF("x", "y")
val hashAggDF = df.groupBy("x").agg(c, sum("y"))
```
The above code will use `HashAggregateExec`. In order to ensure that an exception will be thrown when executing `HashAggregateExec`, I added `throw new RuntimeException("calculate error")` into 72b7f8abfb/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala (L85)
So, if the above code is executed, `RuntimeException("calculate error")` will be thrown.
Before this PR, the error is:
```
execute, tree:
ShuffleQueryStage 0
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(x#105, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#168]
+- HashAggregate(keys=[x#105], functions=[partial_sum(y#106)], output=[x#105, sum#118L])
+- Project [_1#100 AS x#105, _2#101 AS y#106]
+- LocalTableScan [_1#100, _2#101]
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: execute, tree:
ShuffleQueryStage 0
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(x#105, 5), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [id=#168]
+- HashAggregate(keys=[x#105], functions=[partial_sum(y#106)], output=[x#105, sum#118L])
+- Project [_1#100 AS x#105, _2#101 AS y#106]
+- LocalTableScan [_1#100, _2#101]
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:56)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.ShuffleQueryStageExec.doMaterialize(QueryStageExec.scala:163)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.QueryStageExec.$anonfun$materialize$1(QueryStageExec.scala:81)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$executeQuery$1(SparkPlan.scala:218)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:215)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.QueryStageExec.materialize(QueryStageExec.scala:79)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.$anonfun$getFinalPhysicalPlan$5(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:207)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.$anonfun$getFinalPhysicalPlan$5$adapted(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:205)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.$anonfun$getFinalPhysicalPlan$1(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:205)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:772)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.getFinalPhysicalPlan(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.executeCollect(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:289)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.collectFromPlan(Dataset.scala:3708)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.$anonfun$collect$1(Dataset.scala:2977)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.$anonfun$withAction$1(Dataset.scala:3699)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.$anonfun$withNewExecutionId$5(SQLExecution.scala:103)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withSQLConfPropagated(SQLExecution.scala:163)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.$anonfun$withNewExecutionId$1(SQLExecution.scala:90)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:772)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withNewExecutionId(SQLExecution.scala:64)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.withAction(Dataset.scala:3697)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.collect(Dataset.scala:2977)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$assertNoExceptions$3(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:665)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.SQLHelper.withSQLConf(SQLHelper.scala:54)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.SQLHelper.withSQLConf$(SQLHelper.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.org$apache$spark$sql$test$SQLTestUtilsBase$$super$withSQLConf(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:37)
at org.apache.spark.sql.test.SQLTestUtilsBase.withSQLConf(SQLTestUtils.scala:246)
at org.apache.spark.sql.test.SQLTestUtilsBase.withSQLConf$(SQLTestUtils.scala:244)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.withSQLConf(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:37)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$assertNoExceptions$2(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:659)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$assertNoExceptions$2$adapted(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:655)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:877)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.foreach(TraversableLike.scala:876)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.assertNoExceptions(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:655)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$new$126(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:695)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$new$126$adapted(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:695)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$new$125(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:695)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:85)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:83)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:104)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:22)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:20)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.withFixture(SparkFunSuite.scala:176)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.invokeWithFixture$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:188)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:200)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:306)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTest(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:200)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTest$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:182)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterEach$$super$runTest(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterEach.runTest(BeforeAndAfterEach.scala:234)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterEach.runTest$(BeforeAndAfterEach.scala:227)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.runTest(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTests$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:233)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:413)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:401)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsInBranch(Engine.scala:396)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsImpl(Engine.scala:475)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTests(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:233)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTests$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:232)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.runTests(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
at org.scalatest.Suite.run(Suite.scala:1112)
at org.scalatest.Suite.run$(Suite.scala:1094)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.org$scalatest$funsuite$AnyFunSuiteLike$$super$run(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$run$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:237)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runImpl(Engine.scala:535)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.run(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:237)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.run$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:236)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterAll$$super$run(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.liftedTree1$1(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:213)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:210)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run$(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:208)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.run(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
at org.scalatest.tools.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.scala:45)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$doRunRunRunDaDoRunRun$13(Runner.scala:1320)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$doRunRunRunDaDoRunRun$13$adapted(Runner.scala:1314)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.doRunRunRunDaDoRunRun(Runner.scala:1314)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$runOptionallyWithPassFailReporter$24(Runner.scala:993)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$runOptionallyWithPassFailReporter$24$adapted(Runner.scala:971)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.withClassLoaderAndDispatchReporter(Runner.scala:1480)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.runOptionallyWithPassFailReporter(Runner.scala:971)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.run(Runner.scala:798)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner.run(Runner.scala)
at org.jetbrains.plugins.scala.testingSupport.scalaTest.ScalaTestRunner.runScalaTest2(ScalaTestRunner.java:131)
at org.jetbrains.plugins.scala.testingSupport.scalaTest.ScalaTestRunner.main(ScalaTestRunner.java:28)
Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: execute, tree:
HashAggregate(keys=[x#105], functions=[partial_sum(y#106)], output=[x#105, sum#118L])
+- Project [_1#100 AS x#105, _2#101 AS y#106]
+- LocalTableScan [_1#100, _2#101]
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:56)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.HashAggregateExec.doExecute(HashAggregateExec.scala:84)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$execute$1(SparkPlan.scala:180)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$executeQuery$1(SparkPlan.scala:218)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:215)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.execute(SparkPlan.scala:176)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.inputRDD$lzycompute(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:118)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.inputRDD(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:118)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.mapOutputStatisticsFuture$lzycompute(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:122)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.mapOutputStatisticsFuture(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.ShuffleQueryStageExec.$anonfun$doMaterialize$1(QueryStageExec.scala:163)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:52)
... 91 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: calculate error
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.HashAggregateExec.$anonfun$doExecute$1(HashAggregateExec.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:52)
... 103 more
```
After this PR, the error is:
```
calculate error
java.lang.RuntimeException: calculate error
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.aggregate.HashAggregateExec.doExecute(HashAggregateExec.scala:84)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$execute$1(SparkPlan.scala:180)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$executeQuery$1(SparkPlan.scala:218)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:215)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.execute(SparkPlan.scala:176)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.inputRDD$lzycompute(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:117)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.inputRDD(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:117)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.mapOutputStatisticsFuture$lzycompute(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec.mapOutputStatisticsFuture(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.ShuffleQueryStageExec.doMaterialize(QueryStageExec.scala:161)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.QueryStageExec.$anonfun$materialize$1(QueryStageExec.scala:80)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$executeQuery$1(SparkPlan.scala:218)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:215)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.QueryStageExec.materialize(QueryStageExec.scala:78)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.$anonfun$getFinalPhysicalPlan$5(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:207)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.$anonfun$getFinalPhysicalPlan$5$adapted(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:205)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.$anonfun$getFinalPhysicalPlan$1(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:205)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:772)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.getFinalPhysicalPlan(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.adaptive.AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.executeCollect(AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala:289)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.collectFromPlan(Dataset.scala:3708)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.$anonfun$collect$1(Dataset.scala:2977)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.$anonfun$withAction$1(Dataset.scala:3699)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.$anonfun$withNewExecutionId$5(SQLExecution.scala:103)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withSQLConfPropagated(SQLExecution.scala:163)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.$anonfun$withNewExecutionId$1(SQLExecution.scala:90)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:772)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withNewExecutionId(SQLExecution.scala:64)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.withAction(Dataset.scala:3697)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.collect(Dataset.scala:2977)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$assertNoExceptions$3(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:665)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.SQLHelper.withSQLConf(SQLHelper.scala:54)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.SQLHelper.withSQLConf$(SQLHelper.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.org$apache$spark$sql$test$SQLTestUtilsBase$$super$withSQLConf(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:37)
at org.apache.spark.sql.test.SQLTestUtilsBase.withSQLConf(SQLTestUtils.scala:246)
at org.apache.spark.sql.test.SQLTestUtilsBase.withSQLConf$(SQLTestUtils.scala:244)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.withSQLConf(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:37)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$assertNoExceptions$2(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:659)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$assertNoExceptions$2$adapted(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:655)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:877)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.foreach(TraversableLike.scala:876)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.assertNoExceptions(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:655)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$new$126(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:695)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$new$126$adapted(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:695)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameAggregateSuite.$anonfun$new$125(DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala:695)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:85)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:83)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:104)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:22)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:20)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.withFixture(SparkFunSuite.scala:176)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.invokeWithFixture$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:188)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:200)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:306)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTest(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:200)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTest$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:182)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterEach$$super$runTest(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterEach.runTest(BeforeAndAfterEach.scala:234)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterEach.runTest$(BeforeAndAfterEach.scala:227)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.runTest(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTests$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:233)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:413)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:401)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsInBranch(Engine.scala:396)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsImpl(Engine.scala:475)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTests(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:233)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTests$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:232)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.runTests(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
at org.scalatest.Suite.run(Suite.scala:1112)
at org.scalatest.Suite.run$(Suite.scala:1094)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.org$scalatest$funsuite$AnyFunSuiteLike$$super$run(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$run$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:237)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runImpl(Engine.scala:535)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.run(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:237)
at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.run$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:236)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterAll$$super$run(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.liftedTree1$1(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:213)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:210)
at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run$(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:208)
at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.run(SparkFunSuite.scala:61)
at org.scalatest.tools.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.scala:45)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$doRunRunRunDaDoRunRun$13(Runner.scala:1320)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$doRunRunRunDaDoRunRun$13$adapted(Runner.scala:1314)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.doRunRunRunDaDoRunRun(Runner.scala:1314)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$runOptionallyWithPassFailReporter$24(Runner.scala:993)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.$anonfun$runOptionallyWithPassFailReporter$24$adapted(Runner.scala:971)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.withClassLoaderAndDispatchReporter(Runner.scala:1480)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.runOptionallyWithPassFailReporter(Runner.scala:971)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner$.run(Runner.scala:798)
at org.scalatest.tools.Runner.run(Runner.scala)
at org.jetbrains.plugins.scala.testingSupport.scalaTest.ScalaTestRunner.runScalaTest2(ScalaTestRunner.java:131)
at org.jetbrains.plugins.scala.testingSupport.scalaTest.ScalaTestRunner.main(ScalaTestRunner.java:28)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
`TreeNodeException` didn't work well.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#31337 from beliefer/SPARK-34234.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose new option `datetimeRebaseMode` for the Avro datasource. The option influences on loading ancient dates and timestamps column values from avro files.
The option supports the same values as the SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.avro.datetimeRebaseModeInRead` namely;
- `"LEGACY"`, when an option is set to this value, Spark rebases dates/timestamps from the legacy hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian) to the Proleptic Gregorian calendar.
- `"CORRECTED"`, dates/timestamps are read AS IS from avro files.
- `"EXCEPTION"`, when it is set as an option value, Spark will fail the reading if it sees ancient dates/timestamps that are ambiguous between the two calendars.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. New options will allow to load avro files from at least two sources in different rebasing modes in the same query. For instance:
```scala
val df1 = spark.read.option("datetimeRebaseMode", "legacy").format("avro").load(folder1)
val df2 = spark.read.option("datetimeRebaseMode", "corrected").format("avro").load(folder2)
df1.join(df2, ...)
```
Before the changes, it is impossible because the SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.avro.datetimeRebaseModeInRead` influences on both reads.
2. Mixing of Dataset/DataFrame and RDD APIs should become possible. Since SQL configs are not propagated through RDDs, the following code fails on ancient timestamps:
```scala
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.legacy.avro.datetimeRebaseModeInRead", "legacy")
spark.read.format("avro").load(folder).distinct.rdd.collect()
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suites:
```
$ build/sbt "test:testOnly *AvroV1Suite"
$ build/sbt "test:testOnly *AvroV2Suite"
```
Closes#31529 from MaxGekk/avro-rebase-options.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR includes the following changes:
1. in `CatalogImpl.uncacheTable`, invalidate caches in cascade when the target table is
a temp view, and `spark.sql.legacy.storeAnalyzedPlanForView` is false (default value).
2. make `SessionCatalog.lookupTempView` public and return processed temp view plan (i.e., with `View` op).
### Why are the changes needed?
Following [SPARK-34052](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34052) (#31107), we should invalidate in cascade for `CatalogImpl.uncacheTable` when the table is a temp view, so that the behavior is consistent.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now `SQLContext.uncacheTable` will drop temp view in cascade by default.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a UT
Closes#31462 from sunchao/SPARK-34347.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
JDBC connection provider API and embedded connection providers already added to the code but no in-depth description about the internals. In this PR I've added both user and developer documentation and additionally added an example custom JDBC connection provider.
### Why are the changes needed?
No documentation and example custom JDBC provider.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
```
cd docs/
SKIP_API=1 jekyll build
```
<img width="793" alt="Screenshot 2021-02-02 at 16 35 43" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18561820/106623428-e48d2880-6574-11eb-8d14-e5c2aa7c37f1.png">
Closes#31384 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-31816.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request exposes the `make_interval` function, [as suggested here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31000#pullrequestreview-560812433), and as agreed to [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31000#issuecomment-754856820) and [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31000#issuecomment-755040234).
This powerful little function allows for idiomatic datetime arithmetic via the Scala API:
```scala
// add two hours
df.withColumn("plus_2_hours", col("first_datetime") + make_interval(hours = lit(2)))
// subtract one week and 30 seconds
col("d") - make_interval(weeks = lit(1), secs = lit(30))
```
The `make_interval` [SQL function](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26446) already exists.
Here is [the JIRA ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33995) for this PR.
### Why are the changes needed?
The Spark API makes it easy to perform datetime addition / subtraction with months (`add_months`) and days (`date_add`). Users need to write code like this to perform datetime addition with years, weeks, hours, minutes, or seconds:
```scala
df.withColumn("plus_2_hours", expr("first_datetime + INTERVAL 2 hours"))
```
We don't want to force users to manipulate SQL strings when they're using the Scala API.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, this PR adds `make_interval` to the `org.apache.spark.sql.functions` API.
This single function will benefit a lot of users. It's a small increase in the surface of the API for a big gain.
### How was this patch tested?
This was tested via unit tests.
cc: MaxGekk
Closes#31073 from MrPowers/SPARK-33995.
Authored-by: MrPowers <matthewkevinpowers@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When explain SQL with cost, treeString about subquery won't show it's statistics:
How to reproduce:
```
spark.sql("create table t1 using parquet as select id as a, id as b from range(1000)")
spark.sql("create table t2 using parquet as select id as c, id as d from range(2000)")
spark.sql("ANALYZE TABLE t1 COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR ALL COLUMNS")
spark.sql("ANALYZE TABLE t2 COMPUTE STATISTICS FOR ALL COLUMNS")
spark.sql("set spark.sql.cbo.enabled=true")
spark.sql(
"""
|WITH max_store_sales AS
| (SELECT max(csales) tpcds_cmax
| FROM (SELECT
| sum(b) csales
| FROM t1 WHERE a < 100 ) x),
|best_ss_customer AS
| (SELECT
| c
| FROM t2
| WHERE d > (SELECT * FROM max_store_sales))
|
|SELECT c FROM best_ss_customer
|""".stripMargin).explain("cost")
```
Before this PR's output:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [c#4263L], Statistics(sizeInBytes=31.3 KiB, rowCount=2.00E+3)
+- Filter (isnotnull(d#4264L) AND (d#4264L > scalar-subquery#4262 [])), Statistics(sizeInBytes=46.9 KiB, rowCount=2.00E+3)
: +- Aggregate [max(csales#4260L) AS tpcds_cmax#4261L]
: +- Aggregate [sum(b#4266L) AS csales#4260L]
: +- Project [b#4266L]
: +- Filter ((a#4265L < 100) AND isnotnull(a#4265L))
: +- Relation default.t1[a#4265L,b#4266L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=23.4 KiB, rowCount=1.00E+3)
+- Relation default.t2[c#4263L,d#4264L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=46.9 KiB, rowCount=2.00E+3)
```
After this pr:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [c#4481L], Statistics(sizeInBytes=31.3 KiB, rowCount=2.00E+3)
+- Filter (isnotnull(d#4482L) AND (d#4482L > scalar-subquery#4480 [])), Statistics(sizeInBytes=46.9 KiB, rowCount=2.00E+3)
: +- Aggregate [max(csales#4478L) AS tpcds_cmax#4479L], Statistics(sizeInBytes=16.0 B, rowCount=1)
: +- Aggregate [sum(b#4484L) AS csales#4478L], Statistics(sizeInBytes=16.0 B, rowCount=1)
: +- Project [b#4484L], Statistics(sizeInBytes=1616.0 B, rowCount=101)
: +- Filter (isnotnull(a#4483L) AND (a#4483L < 100)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.4 KiB, rowCount=101)
: +- Relation[a#4483L,b#4484L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=23.4 KiB, rowCount=1.00E+3)
+- Relation[c#4481L,d#4482L] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=46.9 KiB, rowCount=2.00E+3)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Complete explain treeString's statistics
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
When user use explain with cost mode, user can see subquery's statistic too.
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT
Closes#31485 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-34137.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Passing around the output attributes should have more benefits like keeping the exprID unchanged to avoid bugs when we apply more operators above the command output DataFrame.
This PR did 2 things ：
1. After this pr, a `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` clause's output shows `key` and `value` columns whether you specify the table property `key`. Before this pr, a `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` clause's output only show a `value` column when you specify the table property `key`..
2. Keep `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` command's output attribute exprId unchanged.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. Keep `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES`'s output schema consistence
2. Keep `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` command's output attribute exprId unchanged.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
After this pr, a `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` clause's output shows `key` and `value` columns whether you specify the table property `key`. Before this pr, a `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` clause's output only show a `value` column when you specify the table property `key`.
Before this PR:
```
sql > SHOW TBLPROPERTIES tabe_name('key')
value
value_of_key
```
After this PR
```
sql > SHOW TBLPROPERTIES tabe_name('key')
key value
key value_of_key
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT
Closes#31378 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-34240.
Lead-authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: AngersZhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the issue that `PostgresDialect` can't treat arrays of some types.
Though PostgreSQL supports wide range of types (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/datatype.html), the current `PostgresDialect` can't treat arrays of the following types.
* xml
* tsvector
* tsquery
* macaddr
* macaddr8
* txid_snapshot
* pg_snapshot
* point
* line
* lseg
* box
* path
* polygon
* circle
* pg_lsn
* bit varying
* interval
NOTE: PostgreSQL doesn't implement arrays of serial types so this PR doesn't care about them.
### Why are the changes needed?
To provide better support with PostgreSQL.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. PostgresDialect can handle arrays of types shown above.
### How was this patch tested?
New test.
Closes#31419 from sarutak/postgres-array-types.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Keep consistence with other `SHOW` command according to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31341#issuecomment-774613080
### Why are the changes needed?
Keep consistence
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Not need
Closes#31516 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-34238-follow-up.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow users to have Spark attempt to decommission excluded executors.
Since excluded executors may be flaky, this also adds the ability for users to specify a time limit after which a decommissioning executor will be killed by Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
This may help prevent fetch failures from excluded executors, and also handle the situation in which executors
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, two new configuration flags for the behaviour.
### How was this patch tested?
Extended unit and integration tests.
Closes#31539 from holdenk/re=enable-SPARK-34104-SPARK-34105.
Authored-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This follows up #31160 to update score function in the document.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently we use `f_classif`, `ch2`, `f_regression`, which sound to me the sklearn's naming. It is good to have it but I think it is nice if we have formal score function name with sklearn's ones.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No, only doc change.
Closes#31531 from viirya/SPARK-34080-minor.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow users to have Spark attempt to decommission excluded executors.
Since excluded executors may be flaky, this also adds the ability for users to specify a time limit after which a decommissioning executor will be killed by Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
This may help prevent fetch failures from excluded executors, and also handle the situation in which executors
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, two new configuration flags for the behaviour.
### How was this patch tested?
Extended unit and integration tests.
Closes#31249 from holdenk/configure-inaccessibleList-kill-to-use-decommissioning.
Lead-authored-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Holden Karau <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow users to configure a maximum amount of shuffle blocks to be stored and reject remote shuffle blocks when this threshold is exceeded.
### Why are the changes needed?
In disk constrained environments with large amount of shuffle data, migrations may result in excessive disk pressure on the nodes. On Kube nodes this can result in cascading failures when combined with `emptyDir`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, new configuration parameter.
### How was this patch tested?
New unit tests.
Closes#31493 from holdenk/SPARK-34337-reject-disk-blocks-when-under-disk-pressure.
Lead-authored-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Holden Karau <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Delegate table name validation to the session catalog
### Why are the changes needed?
Queerying of tables with nested namespaces.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
SQL queries of nested namespace queries
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests updated.
Closes#31427 from holdenk/SPARK-34209-delegate-table-name-validation-to-the-catalog.
Authored-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixing identification of timed-out pending pod requests as excess requests to delete when the excess is higher than the newly created timed out requests and there is some non-timed out newly created requests too.
### Why are the changes needed?
After https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29981 only timed out newly created requests and timed out pending requests are taken as excess request.
But there is small bug when the excess is higher than the newly created timed out requests and there is some non-timed out newly created requests as well. Because all the newly created requests are counted as excess request when items are chosen from the timed out pod pending requests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
There is new unit test added: `SPARK-34334: correctly identify timed out pending pod requests as excess`.
Closes#31445 from attilapiros/SPARK-34334.
Authored-by: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Increase the rel tol from 0.2 to 0.35.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix flaky test
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
UT.
Closes#31536 from WeichenXu123/ES-65815.
Authored-by: Weichen Xu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When doing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34399 based on https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31471
Found FileBatchWrite will use `FileFormatWrite.processStates()` too. We need log commit duration in other writer too.
In this pr:
1. Extract a commit job method in SparkHadoopWriter
2. address other commit writer
### Why are the changes needed?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No
Closes#31520 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-34355-followup.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix `KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.stop` to wrap `super.stop` with `Utils.tryLogNonFatalError`.
### Why are the changes needed?
[CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.stop](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala#L559) may throw `SparkException` and this causes K8s resource (pod and configmap) leakage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is a bug fix.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CI with the newly added test case.
Closes#31533 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-34407.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The getMetricsSnapshot method of the PrometheusServlet class has a wrong value, It should be taking the mean value but it's taking the max value.
### Why are the changes needed?
The mean value of timersLabels in the PrometheusServlet class is wrong, You can look at line 105 of this class: L105.
```
sb.append(s"${prefix}Mean$timersLabels ${snapshot.getMax}\n")
```
it should be
```
sb.append(s"${prefix}Mean$timersLabels ${snapshot.getMean}\n")
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Closes#31532 from 397090770/SPARK-34405.
Authored-by: wyp <wyphao.2007@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we pass the default value `EmptyRow` to method `checkEvaluation` in the `StringExpressionsSuite`, but the default value of the 'checkEvaluation' method parameter is the `emptyRow`.
We can clean the parameter for Code Simplifications.
### Why are the changes needed?
for Code Simplifications
**before**:
```
def testConcat(inputs: String*): Unit = {
val expected = if (inputs.contains(null)) null else inputs.mkString
checkEvaluation(Concat(inputs.map(Literal.create(_, StringType))), expected, EmptyRow)
}
```
**after**:
```
def testConcat(inputs: String*): Unit = {
val expected = if (inputs.contains(null)) null else inputs.mkString
checkEvaluation(Concat(inputs.map(Literal.create(_, StringType))), expected)
}
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or Github action.
Closes#31510 from yikf/master.
Authored-by: yikf <13468507104@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current implement of `SQLQueryTestSuite` cannot run on windows system.
Becasue the code below will fail on windows system:
`assume(TestUtils.testCommandAvailable("/bin/bash"))`
For operation system that cannot support `/bin/bash`, we just skip some tests.
### Why are the changes needed?
SQLQueryTestSuite has a bug on windows system.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test
Closes#31466 from beliefer/SPARK-34352.
Authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use standard methods to extract `keys` or `values` from a `Map`, it's semantically consistent and use the `DefaultKeySet` and `DefaultValuesIterable` instead of a manual loop.
**Before**
```
map.map(_._1)
map.map(_._2)
```
**After**
```
map.keys
map.values
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Code Simpilefications.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
Closes#31484 from LuciferYang/keys-and-values.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to enable AQE and DPP when the join is broadcast hash join at the beginning, which can benefit the performance improvement from DPP and AQE at the same time. This PR will make use of the result of build side and then insert the DPP filter into the probe side.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve performance
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
adding new ut
Closes#31258 from JkSelf/supportDPP1.
Authored-by: jiake <ke.a.jia@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to propagate the name used for registering UDFs to `ScalaUDF`, `ScalaUDAF` and `ScaalAggregator`.
Note that `PythonUDF` gets the name correctly: 466c045bfa/python/pyspark/sql/udf.py (L358-L359)
, and same for Hive UDFs:
466c045bfa/sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala (L67)
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR can help in the following scenarios:
1) Better EXPLAIN output
2) By adding `def name: String` to `UserDefinedExpression`, we can match an expression by `UserDefinedExpression` and look up the catalog, an use case needed for #31273.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The EXPLAIN output involving udfs will be changed to use the name used for UDF registration.
For example, for the following:
```
sql("CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION test_udf AS 'org.apache.spark.examples.sql.Spark33084'")
sql("SELECT test_udf(col1) FROM VALUES (1), (2), (3)").explain(true)
```
The output of the optimized plan will change from:
```
Aggregate [spark33084(cast(col1#223 as bigint), org.apache.spark.examples.sql.Spark330846906be0f, 1, 1) AS spark33084(col1)#237]
+- LocalRelation [col1#223]
```
to
```
Aggregate [test_udf(cast(col1#223 as bigint), org.apache.spark.examples.sql.Spark330847a62d697, 1, 1, Some(test_udf)) AS test_udf(col1)#237]
+- LocalRelation [col1#223]
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Closes#31500 from imback82/udaf_name.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds an assert to `FixedLengthRowBasedKeyValueBatch#appendRow` method to check the incoming vlen and klen by comparing them with the lengths stored as member variables as followup to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30788
### Why are the changes needed?
Add assert statement to catch similar bugs in future.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Ran some tests locally, though not easy to test.
Closes#31447 from yliou/SPARK-33726-Assert.
Authored-by: yliou <yliou@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark, `set -v` is defined as "Queries all properties that are defined in the SQLConf of the sparkSession".
But there are other external modules that also define properties and register them to SQLConf. In this case,
it can't be displayed by `set -v` until the conf object is initiated (i.e. calling the object at least once).
In this PR, I propose to eagerly initiate all the objects registered to SQLConf, so that `set -v` will always output
the completed properties.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve the `set -v` command to produces completed and deterministic results
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`set -v` command will dump more configs
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#30363 from linhongliu-db/set-v.
Authored-by: Linhong Liu <linhong.liu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose new options for the Parquet datasource:
1. `datetimeRebaseMode`
2. `int96RebaseMode`
Both options influence on loading ancient dates and timestamps column values from parquet files. The `datetimeRebaseMode` option impacts on loading values of the `DATE`, `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` and `TIMESTAMP_MILLIS` types, `int96RebaseMode` impacts on loading of `INT96` timestamps.
The options support the same values as the SQL configs `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead` and `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.int96RebaseModeInRead` namely;
- `"LEGACY"`, when an option is set to this value, Spark rebases dates/timestamps from the legacy hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian) to the Proleptic Gregorian calendar.
- `"CORRECTED"`, dates/timestamps are read AS IS from parquet files.
- `"EXCEPTION"`, when it is set as an option value, Spark will fail the reading if it sees ancient dates/timestamps that are ambiguous between the two calendars.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. New options will allow to load parquet files from at least two sources in different rebasing modes in the same query. For instance:
```scala
val df1 = spark.read.option("datetimeRebaseMode", "legacy").parquet(folder1)
val df2 = spark.read.option("datetimeRebaseMode", "corrected").parquet(folder2)
df1.join(df2, ...)
```
Before the changes, it is impossible because the SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead` influences on both reads.
2. Mixing of Dataset/DataFrame and RDD APIs should become possible. Since SQL configs are not propagated through RDDs, the following code fails on ancient timestamps:
```scala
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead", "legacy")
spark.read.parquet(folder).distinct.rdd.collect()
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suites:
```
$ build/sbt "sql/test:testOnly *ParquetRebaseDatetimeV1Suite"
$ build/sbt "sql/test:testOnly *ParquetRebaseDatetimeV2Suite"
```
Closes#31489 from MaxGekk/parquet-rebase-options.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31245:
```
[error] /home/runner/work/spark/spark/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/v1/ShowTablesSuite.scala:112:53: value deep is not a member of Array[String]
[error] assert(sql("show tables").schema.fieldNames.deep ==
[error] ^
[error] /home/runner/work/spark/spark/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/v1/ShowTablesSuite.scala:115:72: value deep is not a member of Array[String]
[error] assert(sql("show table extended like 'tbl'").schema.fieldNames.deep ==
[error] ^
[error] /home/runner/work/spark/spark/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/v1/ShowTablesSuite.scala:121:55: value deep is not a member of Array[String]
[error] assert(sql("show tables").schema.fieldNames.deep ==
[error] ^
[error] /home/runner/work/spark/spark/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/v1/ShowTablesSuite.scala:124:74: value deep is not a member of Array[String]
[error] assert(sql("show table extended like 'tbl'").schema.fieldNames.deep ==
[error] ^
```
It broke Scala 2.13 build. This PR works around by using ScalaTests' `===` that can compare `Array`s safely.
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix the build.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
CI in this PR should test it out.
Closes#31526 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34157.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add a note about pip installation test in RC for release vote template.
### Why are the changes needed?
To promote PySpark users to test PyPi distribution and pip installation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. It will be used for release vote.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#31527 from HyukjinKwon/minor-update-vote-templ.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove an unnecessary quote in the documentation.
Super trivial.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix a mistake.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Just doc
Closes#31523 from gengliangwang/removeQuote.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Keep consistence with other `SHOW` command according to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31341#issuecomment-774613080
### Why are the changes needed?
Keep consistence
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Not need
Closes#31518 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-34239-followup.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current implement of some DDL not unify the output and not pass the output properly to physical command.
Such as: The `ShowTables` output attributes `namespace`, but `ShowTablesCommand` output attributes `database`.
As the query plan, this PR pass the output attributes from `ShowTables` to `ShowTablesCommand`, `ShowTableExtended ` to `ShowTablesCommand`.
Take `show tables` and `show table extended like 'tbl'` as example.
The output before this PR:
`show tables`
|database|tableName|isTemporary|
-- | -- | --
| default| tbl| false|
If catalog is v2 session catalog, the output before this PR:
|namespace|tableName|
-- | --
| default| tbl
`show table extended like 'tbl'`
|database|tableName|isTemporary| information|
-- | -- | -- | --
| default| tbl| false|Database: default...|
The output after this PR:
`show tables`
|namespace|tableName|isTemporary|
-- | -- | --
| default| tbl| false|
`show table extended like 'tbl'`
|namespace|tableName|isTemporary| information|
-- | -- | -- | --
| default| tbl| false|Database: default...|
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR have benefits as follows:
First, Unify schema for the output of SHOW TABLES.
Second, pass the output attributes could keep the expr ID unchanged, so that avoid bugs when we apply more operators above the command output dataframe.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
The output schema of `SHOW TABLES` replace `database` by `namespace`.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#31245 from beliefer/SPARK-34157.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add some info log around commit log.
### Why are the changes needed?
Th commit job is a heavy option and we have seen many times Spark block at this code place due to the slow rpc with namenode or other.
It's better to record the time that commit job cost.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, more info log.
### How was this patch tested?
Not need.
Closes#31471 from ulysses-you/add-commit-log.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Mockito.initMocks(Object)` is a deprecated api, should use `Mockito.openMocks(Object).close()` instead.
### Why are the changes needed?
Cleanup deprecation api usage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
Closes#31487 from LuciferYang/mockito-api.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up for SPARK-34346 which causes a flakiness due to `core-site.xml` test resource file addition. This PR aims to remove the test resource `core/src/test/resources/core-site.xml` from `core` module.
### Why are the changes needed?
Due to the test resource `core-site.xml`, YARN UT becomes flaky in GitHub Action and Jenkins.
```
$ build/sbt "yarn/testOnly *.YarnClusterSuite -- -z SPARK-16414" -Pyarn
...
[info] YarnClusterSuite:
[info] - yarn-cluster should respect conf overrides in SparkHadoopUtil (SPARK-16414, SPARK-23630) *** FAILED *** (20 seconds, 209 milliseconds)
[info] FAILED did not equal FINISHED (stdout/stderr was not captured) (BaseYarnClusterSuite.scala:210)
```
To isolate more, we may use `SPARK_TEST_HADOOP_CONF_DIR` like `yarn` module's `yarn/Client`, but it seems an overkill in `core` module.
```
// SPARK-23630: during testing, Spark scripts filter out hadoop conf dirs so that user's
// environments do not interfere with tests. This allows a special env variable during
// tests so that custom conf dirs can be used by unit tests.
val confDirs = Seq("HADOOP_CONF_DIR", "YARN_CONF_DIR") ++
(if (Utils.isTesting) Seq("SPARK_TEST_HADOOP_CONF_DIR") else Nil)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Closes#31515 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-34346-2.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
