## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr supported a DDL-formatted string in `DataStreamReader.schema`.
This fix could make users easily define a schema without importing the type classes.
For example,
```scala
scala> spark.readStream.schema("col0 INT, col1 DOUBLE").load("/tmp/abc").printSchema()
root
|-- col0: integer (nullable = true)
|-- col1: double (nullable = true)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `DataStreamReaderWriterSuite`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#18373 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-20431.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Integrate Apache Arrow with Spark to increase performance of `DataFrame.toPandas`. This has been done by using Arrow to convert data partitions on the executor JVM to Arrow payload byte arrays where they are then served to the Python process. The Python DataFrame can then collect the Arrow payloads where they are combined and converted to a Pandas DataFrame. All non-complex data types are currently supported, otherwise an `UnsupportedOperation` exception is thrown.
Additions to Spark include a Scala package private method `Dataset.toArrowPayloadBytes` that will convert data partitions in the executor JVM to `ArrowPayload`s as byte arrays so they can be easily served. A package private class/object `ArrowConverters` that provide data type mappings and conversion routines. In Python, a public method `DataFrame.collectAsArrow` is added to collect Arrow payloads and an optional flag in `toPandas(useArrow=False)` to enable using Arrow (uses the old conversion by default).
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test suite `ArrowConvertersSuite` that will run tests on conversion of Datasets to Arrow payloads for supported types. The suite will generate a Dataset and matching Arrow JSON data, then the dataset is converted to an Arrow payload and finally validated against the JSON data. This will ensure that the schema and data has been converted correctly.
Added PySpark tests to verify the `toPandas` method is producing equal DataFrames with and without pyarrow. A roundtrip test to ensure the pandas DataFrame produced by pyspark is equal to a one made directly with pandas.
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Author: Li Jin <li.jin@twosigma.com>
Author: Wes McKinney <wes.mckinney@twosigma.com>
Closes#15821 from BryanCutler/wip-toPandas_with_arrow-SPARK-13534.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we convert a spark DataFrame to Pandas Dataframe by `pd.DataFrame.from_records`. It infers the data type from the data and doesn't respect the spark DataFrame Schema. This PR fixes it.
## How was this patch tested?
a new regression test
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Author: Wenchen Fan <cloud0fan@gmail.com>
Closes#18378 from cloud-fan/to_pandas.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Python wrappers for `o.a.s.sql.functions.explode_outer` and `o.a.s.sql.functions.posexplode_outer`.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests, doctests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#18049 from zero323/SPARK-20830.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fix tries to address the issue in SPARK-19975 where we
have `map_keys` and `map_values` functions in SQL yet there
is no Python equivalent functions.
This fix adds `map_keys` and `map_values` functions to Python.
## How was this patch tested?
This fix is tested manually (See Python docs for examples).
Author: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
Closes#17328 from yongtang/SPARK-19975.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current option name `wholeFile` is misleading for CSV users. Currently, it is not representing a record per file. Actually, one file could have multiple records. Thus, we should rename it. Now, the proposal is `multiLine`.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#18202 from gatorsmile/renameCVSOption.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Document Dataset.union is resolution by position, not by name, since this has been a confusing point for a lot of users.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A - doc only change.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#18256 from rxin/SPARK-21042.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow fill/replace of NAs with booleans, both in Python and Scala
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests, doctests
This PR is original work from me and I license this work to the Spark project
Author: Ruben Berenguel Montoro <ruben@mostlymaths.net>
Author: Ruben Berenguel <ruben@mostlymaths.net>
Closes#18164 from rberenguel/SPARK-19732-fillna-bools.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR does the following tasks:
- Added since
- Added the Python API
- Added test cases
### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases to both Scala and Python
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#18147 from gatorsmile/createOrReplaceGlobalTempView.
Now that Structured Streaming has been out for several Spark release and has large production use cases, the `Experimental` label is no longer appropriate. I've left `InterfaceStability.Evolving` however, as I think we may make a few changes to the pluggable Source & Sink API in Spark 2.3.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#18065 from marmbrus/streamingGA.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes three things as below:
- Use casting rules to a timestamp in `to_timestamp` by default (it was `yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss`).
- Support single argument for `to_timestamp` similarly with APIs in other languages.
For example, the one below works
```
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
Seq("2016-12-31 00:12:00.00").toDF("a").select(to_timestamp(col("a"))).show()
```
prints
```
+----------------------------------------+
|to_timestamp(`a`, 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss')|
+----------------------------------------+
| 2016-12-31 00:12:00|
+----------------------------------------+
```
whereas this does not work in SQL.
**Before**
```
spark-sql> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31 00:12:00');
Error in query: Invalid number of arguments for function to_timestamp; line 1 pos 7
```
**After**
```
spark-sql> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31 00:12:00');
2016-12-31 00:12:00
```
- Related document improvement for SQL function descriptions and other API descriptions accordingly.
**Before**
```
spark-sql> DESCRIBE FUNCTION extended to_date;
...
Usage: to_date(date_str, fmt) - Parses the `left` expression with the `fmt` expression. Returns null with invalid input.
Extended Usage:
Examples:
> SELECT to_date('2016-12-31', 'yyyy-MM-dd');
2016-12-31
```
```
spark-sql> DESCRIBE FUNCTION extended to_timestamp;
...
Usage: to_timestamp(timestamp, fmt) - Parses the `left` expression with the `format` expression to a timestamp. Returns null with invalid input.
Extended Usage:
Examples:
> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31', 'yyyy-MM-dd');
2016-12-31 00:00:00.0
```
**After**
```
spark-sql> DESCRIBE FUNCTION extended to_date;
...
Usage:
to_date(date_str[, fmt]) - Parses the `date_str` expression with the `fmt` expression to
a date. Returns null with invalid input. By default, it follows casting rules to a date if
the `fmt` is omitted.
Extended Usage:
Examples:
> SELECT to_date('2009-07-30 04:17:52');
2009-07-30
> SELECT to_date('2016-12-31', 'yyyy-MM-dd');
2016-12-31
```
```
spark-sql> DESCRIBE FUNCTION extended to_timestamp;
...
Usage:
to_timestamp(timestamp[, fmt]) - Parses the `timestamp` expression with the `fmt` expression to
a timestamp. Returns null with invalid input. By default, it follows casting rules to
a timestamp if the `fmt` is omitted.
Extended Usage:
Examples:
> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31 00:12:00');
2016-12-31 00:12:00
> SELECT to_timestamp('2016-12-31', 'yyyy-MM-dd');
2016-12-31 00:00:00
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `datetime.sql`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17901 from HyukjinKwon/to_timestamp_arg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr supported a DDL-formatted string in `DataFrameReader.schema`.
This fix could make users easily define a schema without importing `o.a.spark.sql.types._`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `DataFrameReaderWriterSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#17719 from maropu/SPARK-20431.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There's a latent corner-case bug in PySpark UDF evaluation where executing a `BatchPythonEvaluation` with a single multi-argument UDF where _at least one argument value is repeated_ will crash at execution with a confusing error.
This problem was introduced in #12057: the code there has a fast path for handling a "batch UDF evaluation consisting of a single Python UDF", but that branch incorrectly assumes that a single UDF won't have repeated arguments and therefore skips the code for unpacking arguments from the input row (whose schema may not necessarily match the UDF inputs due to de-duplication of repeated arguments which occurred in the JVM before sending UDF inputs to Python).
This fix here is simply to remove this special-casing: it turns out that the code in the "multiple UDFs" branch just so happens to work for the single-UDF case because Python treats `(x)` as equivalent to `x`, not as a single-argument tuple.
## How was this patch tested?
New regression test in `pyspark.python.sql.tests` module (tested and confirmed that it fails before my fix).
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#17927 from JoshRosen/SPARK-20685.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It turns out pyspark doctest is calling saveAsTable without ever dropping them. Since we have separate python tests for bucketed table, and there is no checking of results, there is really no need to run the doctest, other than leaving it as an example in the generated doc
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#17932 from felixcheung/pytablecleanup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds Python wrappers for `DataFrameWriter.bucketBy` and `DataFrameWriter.sortBy` ([SPARK-16931](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16931))
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests covering new feature.
__Note__: Based on work of GregBowyer (f49b9a23468f7af32cb53d2b654272757c151725)
CC HyukjinKwon
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Author: Greg Bowyer <gbowyer@fastmail.co.uk>
Closes#17077 from zero323/SPARK-16931.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Move udf wrapping code from `functions.udf` to `functions.UserDefinedFunction`.
- Return wrapped udf from `catalog.registerFunction` and dependent methods.
- Update docstrings in `catalog.registerFunction` and `SQLContext.registerFunction`.
- Unit tests.
## How was this patch tested?
- Existing unit tests and docstests.
- Additional tests covering new feature.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#17831 from zero323/SPARK-18777.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds `hint` method to PySpark `DataFrame`.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests, doctests.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#17850 from zero323/SPARK-20584.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds Python bindings for `Column.eqNullSafe`
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests, existing unit tests, doc build.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#17605 from zero323/SPARK-20290.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently pyspark Dataframe.fillna API supports boolean type when we pass dict, but it is missing in documentation.
## How was this patch tested?
>>> spark.createDataFrame([Row(a=True),Row(a=None)]).fillna({"a" : True}).show()
+----+
| a|
+----+
|true|
|true|
+----+
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Srinivasa Reddy Vundela <vsr@cloudera.com>
Closes#17688 from vundela/fillna_doc_fix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fill up the documentation with examples for `bitwiseOR`, `bitwiseAND`, `bitwiseXOR`. `contains`, `asc` and `desc` in `Column` API.
Also, this PR fixes minor typos in the documentation and matches some of the contents between Scala doc and Python doc.
Lastly, this PR suggests to use `spark` rather than `sc` in doc tests in `Column` for Python documentation.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc tests were added and manually tested with the commands below:
`./python/run-tests.py --module pyspark-sql`
`./python/run-tests.py --module pyspark-sql --python-executable python3`
`./dev/lint-python`
Output was checked via `make html` under `./python/docs`. The snapshots will be left on the codes with comments.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17737 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-20442.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add docstrings to column.py for the Column functions `rlike`, `like`, `startswith`, and `endswith`. Pass these docstrings through `_bin_op`
There may be a better place to put the docstrings. I put them immediately above the Column class.
## How was this patch tested?
I ran `make html` on my local computer to remake the documentation, and verified that the html pages were displaying the docstrings correctly. I tried running `dev-tests`, and the formatting tests passed. However, my mvn build didn't work I think due to issues on my computer.
These docstrings are my original work and free license.
davies has done the most recent work reorganizing `_bin_op`
Author: Michael Patterson <map222@gmail.com>
Closes#17469 from map222/patterson-documentation.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes corrections related to JSON APIs as below:
- Rendering links in Python documentation
- Replacing `RDD` to `Dataset` in programing guide
- Adding missing description about JSON Lines consistently in `DataFrameReader.json` in Python API
- De-duplicating little bit of `DataFrameReader.json` in Scala/Java API
## How was this patch tested?
Manually build the documentation via `jekyll build`. Corresponding snapstops will be left on the codes.
Note that currently there are Javadoc8 breaks in several places. These are proposed to be handled in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17477. So, this PR does not fix those.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17602 from HyukjinKwon/minor-json-documentation.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update doc to remove external for createTable, add refreshByPath in python
## How was this patch tested?
manual
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#17512 from felixcheung/catalogdoc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Allows skipping `value` argument if `to_replace` is a `dict`:
```python
df = sc.parallelize([("Alice", 1, 3.0)]).toDF()
df.replace({"Alice": "Bob"}).show()
````
- Adds validation step to ensure homogeneous values / replacements.
- Simplifies internal control flow.
- Improves unit tests coverage.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests, additional unit tests, manual testing.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16793 from zero323/SPARK-19454.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use `XXX` format instead of `ZZ`. `ZZ` seems a `FastDateFormat` specific.
`ZZ` supports "ISO 8601 extended format time zones" but it seems `FastDateFormat` specific option.
I misunderstood this is compatible format with `SimpleDateFormat` when this change is introduced.
Please see [SimpleDateFormat documentation]( https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/text/SimpleDateFormat.html#iso8601timezone) and [FastDateFormat documentation](https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/apidocs/org/apache/commons/lang3/time/FastDateFormat.html).
It seems we better replace `ZZ` to `XXX` because they look using the same strategy - [FastDateParser.java#L930](8767cd4f1a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/time/FastDateParser.java (L930)), [FastDateParser.java#L932-L951 ](8767cd4f1a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/time/FastDateParser.java (L932-L951)) and [FastDateParser.java#L596-L601](8767cd4f1a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/time/FastDateParser.java (L596-L601)).
I also checked the codes and manually debugged it for sure. It seems both cases use the same pattern `( Z|(?:[+-]\\d{2}(?::)\\d{2}))`.
_Note that this should be rather a fix about documentation and not the behaviour change because `ZZ` seems invalid date format in `SimpleDateFormat` as documented in `DataFrameReader` and etc, and both `ZZ` and `XXX` look identically working with `FastDateFormat`_
Current documentation is as below:
```
* <li>`timestampFormat` (default `yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZZ`): sets the string that
* indicates a timestamp format. Custom date formats follow the formats at
* `java.text.SimpleDateFormat`. This applies to timestamp type.</li>
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover this. Also, manually tested as below (BTW, I don't think these are worth being added as tests within Spark):
**Parse**
```scala
scala> new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX").parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000-11:00")
res4: java.util.Date = Tue Mar 21 20:00:00 KST 2017
scala> new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX").parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000Z")
res10: java.util.Date = Tue Mar 21 09:00:00 KST 2017
scala> new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZZ").parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000-11:00")
java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date: "2017-03-21T00:00:00.000-11:00"
at java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:366)
... 48 elided
scala> new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZZ").parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000Z")
java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date: "2017-03-21T00:00:00.000Z"
at java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:366)
... 48 elided
```
```scala
scala> org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat.getInstance("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX").parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000-11:00")
res7: java.util.Date = Tue Mar 21 20:00:00 KST 2017
scala> org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat.getInstance("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX").parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000Z")
res1: java.util.Date = Tue Mar 21 09:00:00 KST 2017
scala> org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat.getInstance("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZZ").parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000-11:00")
res8: java.util.Date = Tue Mar 21 20:00:00 KST 2017
scala> org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat.getInstance("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZZ").parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000Z")
res2: java.util.Date = Tue Mar 21 09:00:00 KST 2017
```
**Format**
```scala
scala> new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX").format(new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX").parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000-11:00"))
res6: String = 2017-03-21T20:00:00.000+09:00
```
```scala
scala> val fd = org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat.getInstance("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZZ")
fd: org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat = FastDateFormat[yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZZ,ko_KR,Asia/Seoul]
scala> fd.format(fd.parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000-11:00"))
res1: String = 2017-03-21T20:00:00.000+09:00
scala> val fd = org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat.getInstance("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX")
fd: org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat = FastDateFormat[yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX,ko_KR,Asia/Seoul]
scala> fd.format(fd.parse("2017-03-21T00:00:00.000-11:00"))
res2: String = 2017-03-21T20:00:00.000+09:00
```
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17489 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-20166.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to match minor documentations changes in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17399 and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17380 to R/Python.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests in Python , Python tests via `./python/run-tests.py --module=pyspark-sql` and lint-checks for Python/R.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17429 from HyukjinKwon/minor-match-doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
An additional trigger and trigger executor that will execute a single trigger only. One can use this OneTime trigger to have more control over the scheduling of triggers.
In addition, this patch requires an optimization to StreamExecution that logs a commit record at the end of successfully processing a batch. This new commit log will be used to determine the next batch (offsets) to process after a restart, instead of using the offset log itself to determine what batch to process next after restart; using the offset log to determine this would process the previously logged batch, always, thus not permitting a OneTime trigger feature.
## How was this patch tested?
A number of existing tests have been revised. These tests all assumed that when restarting a stream, the last batch in the offset log is to be re-processed. Given that we now have a commit log that will tell us if that last batch was processed successfully, the results/assumptions of those tests needed to be revised accordingly.
In addition, a OneTime trigger test was added to StreamingQuerySuite, which tests:
- The semantics of OneTime trigger (i.e., on start, execute a single batch, then stop).
- The case when the commit log was not able to successfully log the completion of a batch before restart, which would mean that we should fall back to what's in the offset log.
- A OneTime trigger execution that results in an exception being thrown.
marmbrus tdas zsxwing
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Tyson Condie <tcondie@gmail.com>
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#17219 from tcondie/stream-commit.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to support _not_ trimming the white spaces when writing out. These are `false` by default in CSV reading path but these are `true` by default in CSV writing in univocity parser.
Both `ignoreLeadingWhiteSpace` and `ignoreTrailingWhiteSpace` options are not being used for writing and therefore, we are always trimming the white spaces.
It seems we should provide a way to keep this white spaces easily.
WIth the data below:
```scala
val df = spark.read.csv(Seq("a , b , c").toDS)
df.show()
```
```
+---+----+---+
|_c0| _c1|_c2|
+---+----+---+
| a | b | c|
+---+----+---+
```
**Before**
```scala
df.write.csv("/tmp/text.csv")
spark.read.text("/tmp/text.csv").show()
```
```
+-----+
|value|
+-----+
|a,b,c|
+-----+
```
It seems this can't be worked around via `quoteAll` too.
```scala
df.write.option("quoteAll", true).csv("/tmp/text.csv")
spark.read.text("/tmp/text.csv").show()
```
```
+-----------+
| value|
+-----------+
|"a","b","c"|
+-----------+
```
**After**
```scala
df.write.option("ignoreLeadingWhiteSpace", false).option("ignoreTrailingWhiteSpace", false).csv("/tmp/text.csv")
spark.read.text("/tmp/text.csv").show()
```
```
+----------+
| value|
+----------+
|a , b , c|
+----------+
```
Note that this case is possible in R
```r
> system("cat text.csv")
f1,f2,f3
a , b , c
> df <- read.csv(file="text.csv")
> df
f1 f2 f3
1 a b c
> write.csv(df, file="text1.csv", quote=F, row.names=F)
> system("cat text1.csv")
f1,f2,f3
a , b , c
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in `CSVSuite` and manual tests for Python.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17310 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-18579.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to make `mode` options in both CSV and JSON to use `cass object` and fix some related comments related previous fix.
Also, this PR modifies some tests related parse modes.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified unit tests in both `CSVSuite.scala` and `JsonSuite.scala`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17377 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-19949.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update docs for NaN handling in approxQuantile.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#17369 from zhengruifeng/doc_quantiles_nan.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to support an array of struct type in `to_json` as below:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
val df = Seq(Tuple1(Tuple1(1) :: Nil)).toDF("a")
df.select(to_json($"a").as("json")).show()
```
```
+----------+
| json|
+----------+
|[{"_1":1}]|
+----------+
```
Currently, it throws an exception as below (a newline manually inserted for readability):
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve 'structtojson(`array`)' due to data type
mismatch: structtojson requires that the expression is a struct expression.;;
```
This allows the roundtrip with `from_json` as below:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
val schema = ArrayType(StructType(StructField("a", IntegerType) :: Nil))
val df = Seq("""[{"a":1}, {"a":2}]""").toDF("json").select(from_json($"json", schema).as("array"))
df.show()
// Read back.
df.select(to_json($"array").as("json")).show()
```
```
+----------+
| array|
+----------+
|[[1], [2]]|
+----------+
+-----------------+
| json|
+-----------------+
|[{"a":1},{"a":2}]|
+-----------------+
```
Also, this PR proposes to rename from `StructToJson` to `StructsToJson ` and `JsonToStruct` to `JsonToStructs`.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonExpressionsSuite` for Scala, doctest for Python and test in `test_sparkSQL.R` for R.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17192 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-19849.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As timezone setting can also affect partition values, it works for all formats, we should make it clear.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>
Closes#17299 from lw-lin/timezone.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As timezone setting can also affect partition values, it works for all formats, we should make it clear.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#17281 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-19817.
Beside the issue in spark api, also fix 2 minor issues in pyspark
- support read from multiple input paths for orc
- support read from multiple input paths for text
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes#10307 from zjffdu/SPARK-12334.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add handling of input of type `Int` for dataType `TimestampType` to `EvaluatePython.scala`. Py4J serializes ints smaller than MIN_INT or larger than MAX_INT to Long, which are handled correctly already, but values between MIN_INT and MAX_INT are serialized to Int.
These range limits correspond to roughly half an hour on either side of the epoch. As a result, PySpark doesn't allow TimestampType values to be created in this range.
Alternatives attempted: patching the `TimestampType.toInternal` function to cast return values to `long`, so Py4J would always serialize them to Scala Long. Python3 does not have a `long` type, so this approach failed on Python3.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new PySpark-side test that fails without the change.
The contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license.
Resubmission of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896. The original PR didn't go through Jenkins and broke the build. davies dongjoon-hyun
cloud-fan Could you kick off a Jenkins run for me? It passed everything for me locally, but it's possible something has changed in the last few weeks.
Author: Jason White <jason.white@shopify.com>
Closes#17200 from JasonMWhite/SPARK-19561.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Cast the output of `TimestampType.toInternal` to long to allow for proper Timestamp creation in DataFrames near the epoch.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test that fails without the change.
dongjoon-hyun davies Mind taking a look?
The contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license.
Author: Jason White <jason.white@shopify.com>
Closes#16896 from JasonMWhite/SPARK-19561.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to remove incorrect implementation that has been not executed so far (at least from Spark 1.5.2) for `in` operator and throw a correct exception rather than saying it is a bool. I tested the codes above in 1.5.2, 1.6.3, 2.1.0 and in the master branch as below:
**1.5.2**
```python
>>> df = sqlContext.createDataFrame([[1]])
>>> 1 in df._1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark-1.5.2-bin-hadoop2.6/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 418, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
**1.6.3**
```python
>>> 1 in sqlContext.range(1).id
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark-1.6.3-bin-hadoop2.6/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 447, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
**2.1.0**
```python
>>> 1 in spark.range(1).id
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark-2.1.0-bin-hadoop2.7/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 426, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
**Current Master**
```python
>>> 1 in spark.range(1).id
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 452, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
**After**
```python
>>> 1 in spark.range(1).id
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 184, in __contains__
raise ValueError("Cannot apply 'in' operator against a column: please use 'contains' "
ValueError: Cannot apply 'in' operator against a column: please use 'contains' in a string column or 'array_contains' function for an array column.
```
In more details,
It seems the implementation intended to support this
```python
1 in df.column
```
However, currently, it throws an exception as below:
```python
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../spark/python/pyspark/sql/column.py", line 426, in __nonzero__
raise ValueError("Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', "
ValueError: Cannot convert column into bool: please use '&' for 'and', '|' for 'or', '~' for 'not' when building DataFrame boolean expressions.
```
What happens here is as below:
```python
class Column(object):
def __contains__(self, item):
print "I am contains"
return Column()
def __nonzero__(self):
raise Exception("I am nonzero.")
>>> 1 in Column()
I am contains
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 6, in __nonzero__
Exception: I am nonzero.
```
It seems it calls `__contains__` first and then `__nonzero__` or `__bool__` is being called against `Column()` to make this a bool (or int to be specific).
It seems `__nonzero__` (for Python 2), `__bool__` (for Python 3) and `__contains__` forcing the the return into a bool unlike other operators. There are few references about this as below:
https://bugs.python.org/issue16011http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12244074/python-source-code-for-built-in-in-operator/12244378#12244378http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38542543/functionality-of-python-in-vs-contains/38542777
It seems we can't overwrite `__nonzero__` or `__bool__` as a workaround to make this working because these force the return type as a bool as below:
```python
class Column(object):
def __contains__(self, item):
print "I am contains"
return Column()
def __nonzero__(self):
return "a"
>>> 1 in Column()
I am contains
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: __nonzero__ should return bool or int, returned str
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests in `tests.py`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#17160 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-19701.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to both,
**Do not allow json arrays with multiple elements and return null in `from_json` with `StructType` as the schema.**
Currently, it only reads the single row when the input is a json array. So, the codes below:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
val schema = StructType(StructField("a", IntegerType) :: Nil)
Seq(("""[{"a": 1}, {"a": 2}]""")).toDF("struct").select(from_json(col("struct"), schema)).show()
```
prints
```
+--------------------+
|jsontostruct(struct)|
+--------------------+
| [1]|
+--------------------+
```
This PR simply suggests to print this as `null` if the schema is `StructType` and input is json array.with multiple elements
```
+--------------------+
|jsontostruct(struct)|
+--------------------+
| null|
+--------------------+
```
**Support json arrays in `from_json` with `ArrayType` as the schema.**
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
val schema = ArrayType(StructType(StructField("a", IntegerType) :: Nil))
Seq(("""[{"a": 1}, {"a": 2}]""")).toDF("array").select(from_json(col("array"), schema)).show()
```
prints
```
+-------------------+
|jsontostruct(array)|
+-------------------+
| [[1], [2]]|
+-------------------+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test in `JsonExpressionsSuite`, `JsonFunctionsSuite`, Python doctests and manual test.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#16929 from HyukjinKwon/disallow-array.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update doc for R, programming guide. Clarify default behavior for all languages.
## How was this patch tested?
manually
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#17128 from felixcheung/jsonwholefiledoc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes the support for multiple lines for CSV by resembling the multiline supports in JSON datasource (in case of JSON, per file).
So, this PR introduces `wholeFile` option which makes the format not splittable and reads each whole file. Since Univocity parser can produces each row from a stream, it should be capable of parsing very large documents when the internal rows are fix in the memory.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in `CSVSuite` and `tests.py`
Manual tests with a single 9GB CSV file in local file system, for example,
```scala
spark.read.option("wholeFile", true).option("inferSchema", true).csv("tmp.csv").count()
```
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#16976 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-19610.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replaces `UserDefinedFunction` object returned from `udf` with a function wrapper providing docstring and arguments information as proposed in [SPARK-19161](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19161).
### Backward incompatible changes:
- `pyspark.sql.functions.udf` will return a `function` instead of `UserDefinedFunction`. To ensure backward compatible public API we use function attributes to mimic `UserDefinedFunction` API (`func` and `returnType` attributes). This should have a minimal impact on the user code.
An alternative implementation could use dynamical sub-classing. This would ensure full backward compatibility but is more fragile in practice.
### Limitations:
Full functionality (retained docstring and argument list) is achieved only in the recent Python version. Legacy Python version will preserve only docstrings, but not argument list. This should be an acceptable trade-off between achieved improvements and overall complexity.
### Possible impact on other tickets:
This can affect [SPARK-18777](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18777).
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests to ensure backward compatibility, additional tests targeting proposed changes.
Author: zero323 <zero323@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#16534 from zero323/SPARK-19161.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
to be consistent with the scala API, we should also add `contains` to `Column` in pyspark.
## How was this patch tested?
updated unit test
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#17036 from cloud-fan/pyspark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added a logic to put malformed tokens into a new field when parsing CSV data in case of permissive modes. In the current master, if the CSV parser hits these malformed ones, it throws an exception below (and then a job fails);
```
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
at java.sql.Date.valueOf(Date.java:143)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.DateTimeUtils$.stringToTime(DateTimeUtils.scala:137)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVTypeCast$$anonfun$castTo$6.apply$mcJ$sp(CSVInferSchema.scala:272)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVTypeCast$$anonfun$castTo$6.apply(CSVInferSchema.scala:272)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVTypeCast$$anonfun$castTo$6.apply(CSVInferSchema.scala:272)
at scala.util.Try.getOrElse(Try.scala:79)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.CSVTypeCast$.castTo(CSVInferSchema.scala:269)
at
```
In case that users load large CSV-formatted data, the job failure makes users get some confused. So, this fix set NULL for original columns and put malformed tokens in a new field.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CSVSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#16928 from maropu/SPARK-18699-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a special streaming deduplication operator to support `dropDuplicates` with `aggregation` and watermark. It reuses the `dropDuplicates` API but creates new logical plan `Deduplication` and new physical plan `DeduplicationExec`.
The following cases are supported:
- one or multiple `dropDuplicates()` without aggregation (with or without watermark)
- `dropDuplicates` before aggregation
Not supported cases:
- `dropDuplicates` after aggregation
Breaking changes:
- `dropDuplicates` without aggregation doesn't work with `complete` or `update` mode.
## How was this patch tested?
The new unit tests.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#16970 from zsxwing/dedup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If a new option `wholeFile` is set to `true` the JSON reader will parse each file (instead of a single line) as a value. This is done with Jackson streaming and it should be capable of parsing very large documents, assuming the row will fit in memory.
Because the file is not buffered in memory the corrupt record handling is also slightly different when `wholeFile` is enabled: the corrupt column will contain the filename instead of the literal JSON if there is a parsing failure. It would be easy to extend this to add the parser location (line, column and byte offsets) to the output if desired.
These changes have allowed types other than `String` to be parsed. Support for `UTF8String` and `Text` have been added (alongside `String` and `InputFormat`) and no longer require a conversion to `String` just for parsing.
I've also included a few other changes that generate slightly better bytecode and (imo) make it more obvious when and where boxing is occurring in the parser. These are included as separate commits, let me know if they should be flattened into this PR or moved to a new one.
## How was this patch tested?
New and existing unit tests. No performance or load tests have been run.
Author: Nathan Howell <nhowell@godaddy.com>
Closes#16386 from NathanHowell/SPARK-18352.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr of #16308.
This pr enables timezone support in CSV/JSON parsing.
We should introduce `timeZone` option for CSV/JSON datasources (the default value of the option is session local timezone).
The datasources should use the `timeZone` option to format/parse to write/read timestamp values.
Notice that while reading, if the timestampFormat has the timezone info, the timezone will not be used because we should respect the timezone in the values.
For example, if you have timestamp `"2016-01-01 00:00:00"` in `GMT`, the values written with the default timezone option, which is `"GMT"` because session local timezone is `"GMT"` here, are:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.session.timeZone", "GMT")
scala> val df = Seq(new java.sql.Timestamp(1451606400000L)).toDF("ts")
df: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [ts: timestamp]
scala> df.show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
scala> df.write.json("/path/to/gmtjson")
```
```sh
$ cat /path/to/gmtjson/part-*
{"ts":"2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z"}
```
whereas setting the option to `"PST"`, they are:
```scala
scala> df.write.option("timeZone", "PST").json("/path/to/pstjson")
```
```sh
$ cat /path/to/pstjson/part-*
{"ts":"2015-12-31T16:00:00.000-08:00"}
```
We can properly read these files even if the timezone option is wrong because the timestamp values have timezone info:
```scala
scala> val schema = new StructType().add("ts", TimestampType)
schema: org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType = StructType(StructField(ts,TimestampType,true))
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).json("/path/to/gmtjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).option("timeZone", "PST").json("/path/to/gmtjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
```
And even if `timezoneFormat` doesn't contain timezone info, we can properly read the values with setting correct timezone option:
```scala
scala> df.write.option("timestampFormat", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").option("timeZone", "JST").json("/path/to/jstjson")
```
```sh
$ cat /path/to/jstjson/part-*
{"ts":"2016-01-01T09:00:00"}
```
```scala
// wrong result
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).option("timestampFormat", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").json("/path/to/jstjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 09:00:00|
+-------------------+
// correct result
scala> spark.read.schema(schema).option("timestampFormat", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss").option("timeZone", "JST").json("/path/to/jstjson").show()
+-------------------+
|ts |
+-------------------+
|2016-01-01 00:00:00|
+-------------------+
```
This pr also makes `JsonToStruct` and `StructToJson` `TimeZoneAwareExpression` to be able to evaluate values with timezone option.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and added some tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#16750 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-18937.
