when we generate map, we first randomly pick a length, then create a seq of key value pair with the expected length, and finally call `toMap`. However, `toMap` will remove all duplicated keys, which makes the actual map size much less than we expected.
This PR fixes this problem by put keys in a set first, to guarantee we have enough keys to build a map with expected length.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10930 from cloud-fan/random-generator.
This pull request creates an internal catalog API. The creation of this API is the first step towards consolidating SQLContext and HiveContext. I envision we will have two different implementations in Spark 2.0: (1) a simple in-memory implementation, and (2) an implementation based on the current HiveClient (ClientWrapper).
I took a look at what Hive's internal metastore interface/implementation, and then created this API based on it. I believe this is the minimal set needed in order to achieve all the needed functionality.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10982 from rxin/SPARK-13078.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12705
**Scope:**
This PR is a general fix for sorting reference resolution when the child's `outputSet` does not have the order-by attributes (called, *missing attributes*):
- UnaryNode support is limited to `Project`, `Window`, `Aggregate`, `Distinct`, `Filter`, `RepartitionByExpression`.
- We will not try to resolve the missing references inside a subquery, unless the outputSet of this subquery contains it.
**General Reference Resolution Rules:**
- Jump over the nodes with the following types: `Distinct`, `Filter`, `RepartitionByExpression`. Do not need to add missing attributes. The reason is their `outputSet` is decided by their `inputSet`, which is the `outputSet` of their children.
- Group-by expressions in `Aggregate`: missing order-by attributes are not allowed to be added into group-by expressions since it will change the query result. Thus, in RDBMS, it is not allowed.
- Aggregate expressions in `Aggregate`: if the group-by expressions in `Aggregate` contains the missing attributes but aggregate expressions do not have it, just add them into the aggregate expressions. This can resolve the analysisExceptions thrown by the three TCPDS queries.
- `Project` and `Window` are special. We just need to add the missing attributes to their `projectList`.
**Implementation:**
1. Traverse the whole tree in a pre-order manner to find all the resolvable missing order-by attributes.
2. Traverse the whole tree in a post-order manner to add the found missing order-by attributes to the node if their `inputSet` contains the attributes.
3. If the origins of the missing order-by attributes are different nodes, each pass only resolves the missing attributes that are from the same node.
**Risk:**
Low. This rule will be trigger iff ```!s.resolved && child.resolved``` is true. Thus, very few cases are affected.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10678 from gatorsmile/sortWindows.
Our current Intersect physical operator simply delegates to RDD.intersect. We should remove the Intersect physical operator and simply transform a logical intersect into a semi-join with distinct. This way, we can take advantage of all the benefits of join implementations (e.g. managed memory, code generation, broadcast joins).
After a search, I found one of the mainstream RDBMS did the same. In their query explain, Intersect is replaced by Left-semi Join. Left-semi Join could help outer-join elimination in Optimizer, as shown in the PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10566
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10630 from gatorsmile/IntersectBySemiJoin.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11955
Currently we simply skip pushdowning filters in parquet if we enable schema merging.
However, we can actually mark particular fields in merging schema for safely pushdowning filters in parquet.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@appier.com>
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#9940 from viirya/safe-pushdown-parquet-filters.
This patch adds support for complex types for ColumnarBatch. ColumnarBatch supports structs
and arrays. There is a simple mapping between the richer catalyst types to these two. Strings
are treated as an array of bytes.
ColumnarBatch will contain a column for each node of the schema. Non-complex schemas consists
of just leaf nodes. Structs represent an internal node with one child for each field. Arrays
are internal nodes with one child. Structs just contain nullability. Arrays contain offsets
and lengths into the child array. This structure is able to handle arbitrary nesting. It has
the key property that we maintain columnar throughout and that primitive types are only stored
in the leaf nodes and contiguous across rows. For example, if the schema is
```
array<array<int>>
```
There are three columns in the schema. The internal nodes each have one children. The leaf node contains all the int data stored consecutively.
As part of this, this patch adds append APIs in addition to the Put APIs (e.g. putLong(rowid, v)
vs appendLong(v)). These APIs are necessary when the batch contains variable length elements.
The vectors are not fixed length and will grow as necessary. This should make the usage a lot
simpler for the writer.
Author: Nong Li <nong@databricks.com>
Closes#10820 from nongli/spark-12854.
As we begin to use unsafe row writing framework(`BufferHolder` and `UnsafeRowWriter`) in more and more places(`UnsafeProjection`, `UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader`, `GenerateColumnAccessor`, etc.), we should add more doc to it and make it easier to use.
This PR abstract the technique used in `UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader`: avoid unnecessary operatition as more as possible. For example, do not always point the row to the buffer at the end, we only need to update the size of row. If all fields are of primitive type, we can even save the row size updating. Then we can apply this technique to more places easily.
a local benchmark shows `UnsafeProjection` is up to 1.7x faster after this PR:
**old version**
```
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
unsafe projection: Avg Time(ms) Avg Rate(M/s) Relative Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
single long 2616.04 102.61 1.00 X
single nullable long 3032.54 88.52 0.86 X
primitive types 9121.05 29.43 0.29 X
nullable primitive types 12410.60 21.63 0.21 X
```
**new version**
```
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
unsafe projection: Avg Time(ms) Avg Rate(M/s) Relative Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
single long 1533.34 175.07 1.00 X
single nullable long 2306.73 116.37 0.66 X
primitive types 8403.93 31.94 0.18 X
nullable primitive types 12448.39 21.56 0.12 X
```
For single non-nullable long(the best case), we can have about 1.7x speed up. Even it's nullable, we can still have 1.3x speed up. For other cases, it's not such a boost as the saved operations only take a little proportion of the whole process. The benchmark code is included in this PR.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10809 from cloud-fan/unsafe-projection.
This pull request implements strength reduction for comparing integral expressions and decimal literals, which is more common now because we switch to parsing fractional literals as decimal types (rather than doubles). I added the rules to the existing DecimalPrecision rule with some refactoring to simplify the control flow. I also moved DecimalPrecision rule into its own file due to the growing size.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10882 from rxin/SPARK-12904-1.
Benchmark it on 4 different schemas, the result:
```
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
Hash For simple: Avg Time(ms) Avg Rate(M/s) Relative Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
interpreted version 31.47 266.54 1.00 X
codegen version 64.52 130.01 0.49 X
```
```
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
Hash For normal: Avg Time(ms) Avg Rate(M/s) Relative Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
interpreted version 4068.11 0.26 1.00 X
codegen version 1175.92 0.89 3.46 X
```
```
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
Hash For array: Avg Time(ms) Avg Rate(M/s) Relative Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
interpreted version 9276.70 0.06 1.00 X
codegen version 14762.23 0.04 0.63 X
```
```
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
Hash For map: Avg Time(ms) Avg Rate(M/s) Relative Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
interpreted version 58869.79 0.01 1.00 X
codegen version 9285.36 0.06 6.34 X
```
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10816 from cloud-fan/hash-benchmark.
The existing `Union` logical operator only supports two children. Thus, adding a new logical operator `Unions` which can have arbitrary number of children to replace the existing one.
`Union` logical plan is a binary node. However, a typical use case for union is to union a very large number of input sources (DataFrames, RDDs, or files). It is not uncommon to union hundreds of thousands of files. In this case, our optimizer can become very slow due to the large number of logical unions. We should change the Union logical plan to support an arbitrary number of children, and add a single rule in the optimizer to collapse all adjacent `Unions` into a single `Unions`. Note that this problem doesn't exist in physical plan, because the physical `Unions` already supports arbitrary number of children.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10577 from gatorsmile/unionAllMultiChildren.
Also updated documentation to explain why ComputeCurrentTime and EliminateSubQueries are in the optimizer rather than analyzer.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10837 from rxin/optimizer-analyzer-comment.
The three optimization cases are:
1. If the first branch's condition is a true literal, remove the CaseWhen and use the value from that branch.
2. If a branch's condition is a false or null literal, remove that branch.
3. If only the else branch is left, remove the CaseWhen and use the value from the else branch.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10827 from rxin/SPARK-12770.
Call `dealias` on local types to fix schema generation for abstract type members, such as
```scala
type KeyValue = (Int, String)
```
Add simple test
Author: Jakob Odersky <jodersky@gmail.com>
Closes#10749 from jodersky/aliased-schema.
I was reading this part of the analyzer code again and got confused by the difference between findWiderTypeForTwo and findTightestCommonTypeOfTwo.
I also simplified WidenSetOperationTypes to make it a lot simpler. The easiest way to review this one is to just read the original code, and the new code. The logic is super simple.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10802 from rxin/SPARK-12873.
In this PR the new CatalystQl parser stack reaches grammar parity with the old Parser-Combinator based SQL Parser. This PR also replaces all uses of the old Parser, and removes it from the code base.
Although the existing Hive and SQL parser dialects were mostly the same, some kinks had to be worked out:
- The SQL Parser allowed syntax like ```APPROXIMATE(0.01) COUNT(DISTINCT a)```. In order to make this work we needed to hardcode approximate operators in the parser, or we would have to create an approximate expression. ```APPROXIMATE_COUNT_DISTINCT(a, 0.01)``` would also do the job and is much easier to maintain. So, this PR **removes** this keyword.
- The old SQL Parser supports ```LIMIT``` clauses in nested queries. This is **not supported** anymore. See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10689 for the rationale for this.
- Hive has a charset name char set literal combination it supports, for instance the following expression ```_ISO-8859-1 0x4341464562616265``` would yield this string: ```CAFEbabe```. Hive will only allow charset names to start with an underscore. This is quite annoying in spark because as soon as you use a tuple names will start with an underscore. In this PR we **remove** this feature from the parser. It would be quite easy to implement such a feature as an Expression later on.
- Hive and the SQL Parser treat decimal literals differently. Hive will turn any decimal into a ```Double``` whereas the SQL Parser would convert a non-scientific decimal into a ```BigDecimal```, and would turn a scientific decimal into a Double. We follow Hive's behavior here. The new parser supports a big decimal literal, for instance: ```81923801.42BD```, which can be used when a big decimal is needed.
cc rxin viirya marmbrus yhuai cloud-fan
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10745 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12575-2.
The goal of this PR is to eliminate unnecessary translations when there are back-to-back `MapPartitions` operations. In order to achieve this I also made the following simplifications:
- Operators no longer have hold encoders, instead they have only the expressions that they need. The benefits here are twofold: the expressions are visible to transformations so go through the normal resolution/binding process. now that they are visible we can change them on a case by case basis.
- Operators no longer have type parameters. Since the engine is responsible for its own type checking, having the types visible to the complier was an unnecessary complication. We still leverage the scala compiler in the companion factory when constructing a new operator, but after this the types are discarded.
Deferred to a follow up PR:
- Remove as much of the resolution/binding from Dataset/GroupedDataset as possible. We should still eagerly check resolution and throw an error though in the case of mismatches for an `as` operation.
- Eliminate serializations in more cases by adding more cases to `EliminateSerialization`
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#10747 from marmbrus/encoderExpressions.
This pull request rewrites CaseWhen expression to break the single, monolithic "branches" field into a sequence of tuples (Seq[(condition, value)]) and an explicit optional elseValue field.
Prior to this pull request, each even position in "branches" represents the condition for each branch, and each odd position represents the value for each branch. The use of them have been pretty confusing with a lot sliding windows or grouped(2) calls.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10734 from rxin/simplify-case.
Fix the style violation (space before , and :).
This PR is a followup for #10643 and rework of #10685 .
Author: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
Closes#10732 from sarutak/SPARK-12692-followup-sql.
This patch removes CaseKeyWhen expression and replaces it with a factory method that generates the equivalent CaseWhen. This reduces the amount of code we'd need to maintain in the future for both code generation and optimizer.
Note that we introduced CaseKeyWhen to avoid duplicate evaluations of the key. This is no longer a problem because we now have common subexpression elimination.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10722 from rxin/SPARK-12768.
This pull request does a few small things:
1. Separated if simplification from BooleanSimplification and created a new rule SimplifyConditionals. In the future we can also simplify other conditional expressions here.
2. Added unit test for SimplifyConditionals.
3. Renamed SimplifyCaseConversionExpressionsSuite to SimplifyStringCaseConversionSuite
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#10716 from rxin/SPARK-12762.
Fix the style violation (space before , and :).
This PR is a followup for #10643.
Author: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
Closes#10718 from sarutak/SPARK-12692-followup-sql.
The PR allows us to use the new SQL parser to parse SQL expressions such as: ```1 + sin(x*x)```
We enable this functionality in this PR, but we will not start using this actively yet. This will be done as soon as we have reached grammar parity with the existing parser stack.
cc rxin
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10649 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12576.
This PR tries to enable Spark SQL to convert resolved logical plans back to SQL query strings. For now, the major use case is to canonicalize Spark SQL native view support. The major entry point is `SQLBuilder.toSQL`, which returns an `Option[String]` if the logical plan is recognized.
The current version is still in WIP status, and is quite limited. Known limitations include:
1. The logical plan must be analyzed but not optimized
The optimizer erases `Subquery` operators, which contain necessary scope information for SQL generation. Future versions should be able to recover erased scope information by inserting subqueries when necessary.
1. The logical plan must be created using HiveQL query string
Query plans generated by composing arbitrary DataFrame API combinations are not supported yet. Operators within these query plans need to be rearranged into a canonical form that is more suitable for direct SQL generation. For example, the following query plan
```
Filter (a#1 < 10)
+- MetastoreRelation default, src, None
```
need to be canonicalized into the following form before SQL generation:
```
Project [a#1, b#2, c#3]
+- Filter (a#1 < 10)
+- MetastoreRelation default, src, None
```
Otherwise, the SQL generation process will have to handle a large number of special cases.
1. Only a fraction of expressions and basic logical plan operators are supported in this PR
Currently, 95.7% (1720 out of 1798) query plans in `HiveCompatibilitySuite` can be successfully converted to SQL query strings.
Known unsupported components are:
- Expressions
- Part of math expressions
- Part of string expressions (buggy?)
- Null expressions
- Calendar interval literal
- Part of date time expressions
- Complex type creators
- Special `NOT` expressions, e.g. `NOT LIKE` and `NOT IN`
- Logical plan operators/patterns
- Cube, rollup, and grouping set
- Script transformation
- Generator
- Distinct aggregation patterns that fit `DistinctAggregationRewriter` analysis rule
- Window functions
Support for window functions, generators, and cubes etc. will be added in follow-up PRs.
This PR leverages `HiveCompatibilitySuite` for testing SQL generation in a "round-trip" manner:
* For all select queries, we try to convert it back to SQL
* If the query plan is convertible, we parse the generated SQL into a new logical plan
* Run the new logical plan instead of the original one
If the query plan is inconvertible, the test case simply falls back to the original logic.
TODO
- [x] Fix failed test cases
- [x] Support for more basic expressions and logical plan operators (e.g. distinct aggregation etc.)
- [x] Comments and documentation
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10541 from liancheng/sql-generation.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12687
Some queries such as `(select 1 as a) union (select 2 as a)` can't work. This patch fixes it.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#10660 from viirya/fix-union.
Fix most build warnings: mostly deprecated API usages. I'll annotate some of the changes below. CC rxin who is leading the charge to remove the deprecated APIs.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#10570 from srowen/SPARK-12618.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12439
In toCatalystArray, we should look at the data type returned by dataTypeFor instead of silentSchemaFor, to determine if the element is native type. An obvious problem is when the element is Option[Int] class, catalsilentSchemaFor will return Int, then we will wrongly recognize the element is native type.
There is another problem when using Option as array element. When we encode data like Seq(Some(1), Some(2), None) with encoder, we will use MapObjects to construct an array for it later. But in MapObjects, we don't check if the return value of lambdaFunction is null or not. That causes a bug that the decoded data for Seq(Some(1), Some(2), None) would be Seq(1, 2, -1), instead of Seq(1, 2, null).
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#10391 from viirya/fix-catalystarray.
address comments in #10435
This makes the API easier to use if user programmatically generate the call to hash, and they will get analysis exception if the arguments of hash is empty.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10588 from cloud-fan/hash.
just write the arguments into unsafe row and use murmur3 to calculate hash code
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10435 from cloud-fan/hash-expr.
It is currently possible to change the values of the supposedly immutable ```GenericRow``` and ```GenericInternalRow``` classes. This is caused by the fact that scala's ArrayOps ```toArray``` (returned by calling ```toSeq```) will return the backing array instead of a copy. This PR fixes this problem.
This PR was inspired by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10374 by apo1.
cc apo1 sarutak marmbrus cloud-fan nongli (everyone in the previous conversation).
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#10553 from hvanhovell/SPARK-12421.
Right now, numFields will be passed in by pointTo(), then bitSetWidthInBytes is calculated, making pointTo() a little bit heavy.
It should be part of constructor of UnsafeRow.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10528 from davies/numFields.
Most of cases we should propagate null when call `NewInstance`, and so far there is only one case we should stop null propagation: create product/java bean. So I think it makes more sense to propagate null by dafault.
This also fixes a bug when encode null array/map, which is firstly discovered in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10401
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#10443 from cloud-fan/encoder.
Moved (case) classes Strategy, Once, FixedPoint and Batch to the companion object. This is necessary if we want to have the Optimizer easily extendable in the following sense: Usually a user wants to add additional rules, and just take the ones that are already there. However, inner classes made that impossible since the code did not compile
This allows easy extension of existing Optimizers see the DefaultOptimizerExtendableSuite for a corresponding test case.
Author: Stephan Kessler <stephan.kessler@sap.com>
Closes#10174 from stephankessler/SPARK-7727.
When the filter is ```"b in ('1', '2')"```, the filter is not pushed down to Parquet. Thanks!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10278 from gatorsmile/parquetFilterNot.
Compare both left and right side of the case expression ignoring nullablity when checking for type equality.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10156 from dilipbiswal/spark-12102.
This PR adds a new expression `AssertNotNull` to ensure non-nullable fields of products and case classes don't receive null values at runtime.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10331 from liancheng/dataset-nullability-check.
This could simplify the generated code for expressions that is not nullable.
This PR fix lots of bugs about nullability.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10333 from davies/skip_nullable.
This PR removes Hive windows functions from Spark and replaces them with (native) Spark ones. The PR is on par with Hive in terms of features.
This has the following advantages:
* Better memory management.
* The ability to use spark UDAFs in Window functions.
cc rxin / yhuai
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#9819 from hvanhovell/SPARK-8641-2.
