## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
simplify the codegen:
1. only do real codegen if the type can be specialized by the hash set
2. change the null handling. Before: track the nullElementIndex, and create a new ArrayData to insert the null in the middle. After: track the nullElementIndex, put a null placeholder in the ArrayBuilder, at the end create ArrayData from ArrayBuilder directly.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21966 from cloud-fan/minor2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr adds `filter` function which filters the input array using the given predicate.
```sql
> SELECT filter(array(1, 2, 3), x -> x % 2 == 1);
array(1, 3)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21965 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23909/filter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Many Spark SQL users in my company have asked for a way to control the number of output files in Spark SQL. The users prefer not to use function repartition(n) or coalesce(n, shuffle) that require them to write and deploy Scala/Java/Python code. We propose adding the following Hive-style Coalesce and Repartition Hint to Spark SQL:
```
... SELECT /*+ COALESCE(numPartitions) */ ...
... SELECT /*+ REPARTITION(numPartitions) */ ...
```
Multiple such hints are allowed. Multiple nodes are inserted into the logical plan, and the optimizer will pick the leftmost hint.
```
INSERT INTO s SELECT /*+ REPARTITION(100), COALESCE(500), COALESCE(10) */ * FROM t
== Logical Plan ==
'InsertIntoTable 'UnresolvedRelation `s`, false, false
+- 'UnresolvedHint REPARTITION, [100]
+- 'UnresolvedHint COALESCE, [500]
+- 'UnresolvedHint COALESCE, [10]
+- 'Project [*]
+- 'UnresolvedRelation `t`
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand ...
+- Repartition 100, true
+- HiveTableRelation ...
```
## How was this patch tested?
All unit tests. Manual tests using explain.
Author: John Zhuge <jzhuge@apache.org>
Closes#21911 from jzhuge/SPARK-24940.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose column-based API for the `pivot()` function. It allows using of any column expressions as the pivot column. Also this makes it consistent with how groupBy() works.
## How was this patch tested?
I added new tests to `DataFramePivotSuite` and updated PySpark examples for the `pivot()` function.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21699 from MaxGekk/pivot-column.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Enable support for MINUS ALL which was gated at AstBuilder.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in SQLQueryTestSuite and modify PlanParserSuite.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21963 from dilipbiswal/minus-all.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the current master, `toString` throws an exception when `RelationalGroupedDataset` has unresolved expressions;
```
scala> spark.range(0, 10).groupBy("id")
res4: org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset = RelationalGroupedDataset: [grouping expressions: [id: bigint], value: [id: bigint], type: GroupBy]
scala> spark.range(0, 10).groupBy('id)
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.UnresolvedException: Invalid call to dataType on unresolved object, tree: 'id
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.UnresolvedAttribute.dataType(unresolved.scala:105)
at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset$$anonfun$12.apply(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:474)
at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset$$anonfun$12.apply(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:473)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray$class.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:59)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:48)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:104)
at org.apache.spark.sql.RelationalGroupedDataset.toString(RelationalGroupedDataset.scala:473)
at scala.runtime.ScalaRunTime$.scala$runtime$ScalaRunTime$$inner$1(ScalaRunTime.scala:332)
at scala.runtime.ScalaRunTime$.stringOf(ScalaRunTime.scala:337)
at scala.runtime.ScalaRunTime$.replStringOf(ScalaRunTime.scala:345)
```
This pr fixed code to handle the unresolved case in `RelationalGroupedDataset.toString`.
Closes#21752
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `DataFrameAggregateSuite`.
Author: Chris Horn <chorn4033@gmail.com>
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21964 from maropu/SPARK-24788.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the set operations INTERSECT, UNION and EXCEPT are assigned the same precedence. This PR fixes the problem by giving INTERSECT higher precedence than UNION and EXCEPT. UNION and EXCEPT operators are evaluated in the order in which they appear in the query from left to right.
This results in change in behavior because of the change in order of evaluations of set operators in a query. The old behavior is still preserved under a newly added config parameter.
Query `:`
```
SELECT * FROM t1
UNION
SELECT * FROM t2
EXCEPT
SELECT * FROM t3
INTERSECT
SELECT * FROM t4
```
Parsed plan before the change `:`
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Intersect false
:- 'Except false
: :- 'Distinct
: : +- 'Union
: : :- 'Project [*]
: : : +- 'UnresolvedRelation `t1`
: : +- 'Project [*]
: : +- 'UnresolvedRelation `t2`
: +- 'Project [*]
: +- 'UnresolvedRelation `t3`
+- 'Project [*]
+- 'UnresolvedRelation `t4`
```
Parsed plan after the change `:`
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Except false
:- 'Distinct
: +- 'Union
: :- 'Project [*]
: : +- 'UnresolvedRelation `t1`
: +- 'Project [*]
: +- 'UnresolvedRelation `t2`
+- 'Intersect false
:- 'Project [*]
: +- 'UnresolvedRelation `t3`
+- 'Project [*]
+- 'UnresolvedRelation `t4`
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in PlanParserSuite, SQLQueryTestSuite.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21941 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-24966.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support reading/writing Avro logical timestamp type with different precisions
https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.8.2/spec.html#Timestamp+%28millisecond+precision%29
To specify the output timestamp type, use Dataframe option `outputTimestampType` or SQL config `spark.sql.avro.outputTimestampType`. The supported values are
* `TIMESTAMP_MICROS`
* `TIMESTAMP_MILLIS`
The default output type is `TIMESTAMP_MICROS`
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21935 from gengliangwang/avro_timestamp.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR refactors code to get a value for "spark.sql.codegen.comments" by avoiding `SparkEnv.get.conf`. This PR uses `SQLConf.get.codegenComments` since `SQLConf.get` always returns an instance of `SQLConf`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test case to `DebuggingSuite`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19449 from kiszk/SPARK-22219.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Uuid`'s results depend on random seed given during analysis. Thus under streaming query, we will have the same uuids in each execution. This seems to be incorrect for streaming query execution.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#21854 from viirya/uuid_in_streaming.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the current master, `EnsureRequirements` sets the number of exchanges in `ExchangeCoordinator` before `ReuseExchange`. Then, `ReuseExchange` removes some duplicate exchange and the actual number of registered exchanges changes. Finally, the assertion in `ExchangeCoordinator` fails because the logical number of exchanges and the actual number of registered exchanges become different;
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/ExchangeCoordinator.scala#L201
This pr fixed the issue and the code to reproduce this is as follows;
```
scala> sql("SET spark.sql.adaptive.enabled=true")
scala> sql("SET spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold=-1")
scala> val df = spark.range(1).selectExpr("id AS key", "id AS value")
scala> val resultDf = df.join(df, "key").join(df, "key")
scala> resultDf.show
...
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec$$anonfun$doExecute$1.apply(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:119)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:52)
... 101 more
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed
at scala.Predef$.assert(Predef.scala:156)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ExchangeCoordinator.doEstimationIfNecessary(ExchangeCoordinator.scala:201)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ExchangeCoordinator.postShuffleRDD(ExchangeCoordinator.scala:259)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec$$anonfun$doExecute$1.apply(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:124)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.ShuffleExchangeExec$$anonfun$doExecute$1.apply(ShuffleExchangeExec.scala:119)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:52)
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ExchangeCoordinatorSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21754 from maropu/SPARK-24705-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr adds `transform` function which transforms elements in an array using the function.
Optionally we can take the index of each element as the second argument.
```sql
> SELECT transform(array(1, 2, 3), x -> x + 1);
array(2, 3, 4)
> SELECT transform(array(1, 2, 3), (x, i) -> x + i);
array(1, 3, 5)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21954 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23908/transform.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request provides a fix for SPARK-24742: SQL Field MetaData was throwing an Exception in the hashCode method when a "null" Metadata was added via "putNull"
## How was this patch tested?
A new unittest is provided in org/apache/spark/sql/types/MetadataSuite.scala
Author: Kaya Kupferschmidt <k.kupferschmidt@dimajix.de>
Closes#21722 from kupferk/SPARK-24742.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove the AnalysisBarrier LogicalPlan node, which is useless now.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21962 from gatorsmile/refactor2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses issues 2,3 in this [document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fbkjEL878witxVQpOCbjlvOvadHtVjYXeB-2mgzDTvk).
* We modified the closure cleaner to identify closures that are implemented via the LambdaMetaFactory mechanism (serializedLambdas) (issue2).
* We also fix the issue due to scala/bug#11016. There are two options for solving the Unit issue, either add () at the end of the closure or use the trick described in the doc. Otherwise overloading resolution does not work (we are not going to eliminate either of the methods) here. Compiler tries to adapt to Unit and makes these two methods candidates for overloading, when there is polymorphic overloading there is no ambiguity (that is the workaround implemented). This does not look that good but it serves its purpose as we need to support two different uses for method: `addTaskCompletionListener`. One that passes a TaskCompletionListener and one that passes a closure that is wrapped with a TaskCompletionListener later on (issue3).
Note: regarding issue 1 in the doc the plan is:
> Do Nothing. Don’t try to fix this as this is only a problem for Java users who would want to use 2.11 binaries. In that case they can cast to MapFunction to be able to utilize lambdas. In Spark 3.0.0 the API should be simplified so that this issue is removed.
## How was this patch tested?
This was manually tested:
```./dev/change-scala-version.sh 2.12
./build/mvn -DskipTests -Pscala-2.12 clean package
./build/mvn -Pscala-2.12 clean package -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.spark.serializer.ProactiveClosureSerializationSuite -Dtest=None
./build/mvn -Pscala-2.12 clean package -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleanerSuite -Dtest=None
./build/mvn -Pscala-2.12 clean package -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.spark.streaming.DStreamClosureSuite -Dtest=None```
Author: Stavros Kontopoulos <stavros.kontopoulos@lightbend.com>
Closes#21930 from skonto/scala2.12-sup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to refactor the code in AVERAGE by dsl.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21951 from gatorsmile/refactor1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Regarding user-specified schema, data sources may have 3 different behaviors:
1. must have a user-specified schema
2. can't have a user-specified schema
3. can accept the user-specified if it's given, or infer the schema.
I added `ReadSupportWithSchema` to support these behaviors, following data source v1. But it turns out we don't need this extra interface. We can just add a `createReader(schema, options)` to `ReadSupport` and make it call `createReader(options)` by default.
TODO: also fix the streaming API in followup PRs.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21946 from cloud-fan/ds-schema.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
How to reproduce:
```sql
spark-sql> CREATE TABLE tbl AS SELECT 1;
spark-sql> CREATE TABLE tbl1 (c1 BIGINT, day STRING, hour STRING)
> USING parquet
> PARTITIONED BY (day, hour);
spark-sql> INSERT INTO TABLE tbl1 PARTITION (day = '2018-07-25', hour='01') SELECT * FROM tbl where 1=0;
spark-sql> SHOW PARTITIONS tbl1;
spark-sql> CREATE TABLE tbl2 (c1 BIGINT)
> PARTITIONED BY (day STRING, hour STRING);
spark-sql> INSERT INTO TABLE tbl2 PARTITION (day = '2018-07-25', hour='01') SELECT * FROM tbl where 1=0;
spark-sql> SHOW PARTITIONS tbl2;
day=2018-07-25/hour=01
spark-sql>
```
1. Users will be confused about whether the partition data of `tbl1` is generated.
2. Inconsistent with Hive table behavior.
This pr fix this issues.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21883 from wangyum/SPARK-24937.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_except`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
This function returns returns an array of the elements in array1 but not in array2.
Note: The order of elements in the result is not defined.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21103 from kiszk/SPARK-23915.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow up of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21118 .
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21118 we added `SupportsDeprecatedScanRow`. Ideally data source should produce `InternalRow` instead of `Row` for better performance. We should remove `SupportsDeprecatedScanRow` and encourage data sources to produce `InternalRow`, which is also very easy to build.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21921 from cloud-fan/row.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When user calls anUDAF with the wrong number of arguments, Spark previously throws an AssertionError, which is not supposed to be a user-facing exception. This patch updates it to throw AnalysisException instead, so it is consistent with a regular UDF.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated test case udaf.sql.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#21938 from rxin/SPARK-24982.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Previously TVF resolution could throw IllegalArgumentException if the data type is null type. This patch replaces that exception with AnalysisException, enriched with positional information, to improve error message reporting and to be more consistent with rest of Spark SQL.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated the test case in table-valued-functions.sql.out, which is how I identified this problem in the first place.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#21934 from rxin/SPARK-24951.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Similar to SPARK-24890, if all the outputs of `CaseWhen` are semantic equivalence, `CaseWhen` can be removed.
## How was this patch tested?
Tests added.
Author: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Closes#21852 from dbtsai/short-circuit-when.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It proposes a version in which nullable expressions are not valid in the limit clause
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested with unit and e2e tests.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Mauro Palsgraaf <mauropalsgraaf@hotmail.com>
Closes#21807 from mauropalsgraaf/SPARK-24536.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When the pivot column is of a complex type, the eval() result will be an UnsafeRow, while the keys of the HashMap for column value matching is a GenericInternalRow. As a result, there will be no match and the result will always be empty.
So for a pivot column of complex-types, we should:
1) If the complex-type is not comparable (orderable), throw an Exception. It cannot be a pivot column.
2) Otherwise, if it goes through the `PivotFirst` code path, `PivotFirst` should use a TreeMap instead of HashMap for such columns.
This PR has also reverted the walk-around in Analyzer that had been introduced to avoid this `PivotFirst` issue.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21926 from maryannxue/pivot_followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to support `LZMA2` (`XZ`) and `BZIP2` compressions by `AVRO` datasource in write since the codecs may have better characteristics like compression ratio and speed comparing to already supported `snappy` and `deflate` codecs.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested manually and by an existing test which was extended to check the `xz` and `bzip2` compressions.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21902 from MaxGekk/avro-xz-bzip2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I didn't want to pollute the diff in the previous PR and left some TODOs. This is a follow-up to address those TODOs.
## How was this patch tested?
Should be covered by existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#21896 from rxin/SPARK-24865-addendum.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr supported Date/Timestamp in a JDBC partition column (a numeric column is only supported in the master). This pr also modified code to verify a partition column type;
```
val jdbcTable = spark.read
.option("partitionColumn", "text")
.option("lowerBound", "aaa")
.option("upperBound", "zzz")
.option("numPartitions", 2)
.jdbc("jdbc:postgresql:postgres", "t", options)
// with this pr
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Partition column type should be numeric, date, or timestamp, but string found.;
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JDBCRelation$.verifyAndGetNormalizedPartitionColumn(JDBCRelation.scala:165)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JDBCRelation$.columnPartition(JDBCRelation.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JdbcRelationProvider.createRelation(JdbcRelationProvider.scala:36)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSource.resolveRelation(DataSource.scala:317)
// without this pr
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "aaa"
at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:65)
at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:589)
at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:631)
at scala.collection.immutable.StringLike$class.toLong(StringLike.scala:277)
```
Closes#19999
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `JDBCSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21834 from maropu/SPARK-22814.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrade Apache Avro from 1.7.7 to 1.8.2. The major new features:
1. More logical types. From the spec of 1.8.2 https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.8.2/spec.html#Logical+Types we can see comparing to [1.7.7](https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.7.7/spec.html#Logical+Types), the new version support:
- Date
- Time (millisecond precision)
- Time (microsecond precision)
- Timestamp (millisecond precision)
- Timestamp (microsecond precision)
- Duration
2. Single-object encoding: https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.8.2/spec.html#single_object_encoding
This PR aims to update Apache Spark to support these new features.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21761 from gengliangwang/upgrade_avro_1.8.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we do an average, the result is computed dividing the sum of the values by their count. In the case the result is a DecimalType, the way we are casting/managing the precision and scale is not really optimized and it is not coherent with what we do normally.
In particular, a problem can happen when the `Divide` operand returns a result which contains a precision and scale different by the ones which are expected as output of the `Divide` operand. In the case reported in the JIRA, for instance, the result of the `Divide` operand is a `Decimal(38, 36)`, while the output data type for `Divide` is 38, 22. This is not an issue when the `Divide` is followed by a `CheckOverflow` or a `Cast` to the right data type, as these operations return a decimal with the defined precision and scale. Despite in the `Average` operator we do have a `Cast`, this may be bypassed if the result of `Divide` is the same type which it is casted to, hence the issue reported in the JIRA may arise.
The PR proposes to use the normal rules/handling of the arithmetic operators with Decimal data type, so we both reuse the existing code (having a single logic for operations between decimals) and we fix this problem as the result is always guarded by `CheckOverflow`.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21910 from mgaido91/SPARK-24957.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Looks we intentionally set `null` for upper/lower bounds for complex types and don't use it. However, these look used in in-memory partition pruning, which ends up with incorrect results.
This PR proposes to explicitly whitelist the supported types.
```scala
val df = Seq(Array("a", "b"), Array("c", "d")).toDF("arrayCol")
df.cache().filter("arrayCol > array('a', 'b')").show()
```
```scala
val df = sql("select cast('a' as binary) as a")
df.cache().filter("a == cast('a' as binary)").show()
```
**Before:**
```
+--------+
|arrayCol|
+--------+
+--------+
```
```
+---+
| a|
+---+
+---+
```
**After:**
```
+--------+
|arrayCol|
+--------+
| [c, d]|
+--------+
```
```
+----+
| a|
+----+
|[61]|
+----+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests were added and manually tested.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Closes#21882 from HyukjinKwon/stats-filter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implements INTERSECT ALL clause through query rewrites using existing operators in Spark. Please refer to [Link](https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nyW0T0b_ajUduQoPgZLAsyHK8s3_dko3ulQuxaLpUXE) for the design.
Input Query
``` SQL
SELECT c1 FROM ut1 INTERSECT ALL SELECT c1 FROM ut2
```
Rewritten Query
```SQL
SELECT c1
FROM (
SELECT replicate_row(min_count, c1)
FROM (
SELECT c1,
IF (vcol1_cnt > vcol2_cnt, vcol2_cnt, vcol1_cnt) AS min_count
FROM (
SELECT c1, count(vcol1) as vcol1_cnt, count(vcol2) as vcol2_cnt
FROM (
SELECT c1, true as vcol1, null as vcol2 FROM ut1
UNION ALL
SELECT c1, null as vcol1, true as vcol2 FROM ut2
) AS union_all
GROUP BY c1
HAVING vcol1_cnt >= 1 AND vcol2_cnt >= 1
)
)
)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases in SQLQueryTestSuite, DataFrameSuite, SetOperationSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21886 from dilipbiswal/dkb_intersect_all_final.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR propose to address https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21318#discussion_r187843125 comment.
This is rather a nit but looks we better avoid to update the link for each release since it always points the latest (it doesn't look like worth enough updating release guide on the other hand as well).
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Closes#21907 from HyukjinKwon/minor-fix.
When join key is long or int in broadcast join, Spark will use `LongToUnsafeRowMap` to store key-values of the table witch will be broadcasted. But, when `LongToUnsafeRowMap` is broadcasted to executors, and it is too big to hold in memory, it will be stored in disk. At that time, because `write` uses a variable `cursor` to determine how many bytes in `page` of `LongToUnsafeRowMap` will be write out and the `cursor` was not restore when deserializing, executor will write out nothing from page into disk.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Restore cursor value when deserializing.
Author: liulijia <liutang123@yeah.net>
Closes#21772 from liutang123/SPARK-24809.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Update DateTimeUtilsSuite so that when testing roundtripping in daysToMillis and millisToDays multiple skipdates can be specified.
- Updated test so that both new years eve 2014 and new years day 2015 are skipped for kiribati time zones. This is necessary as java versions pre 181-b13 considered new years day 2015 to be skipped while susequent versions corrected this to new years eve.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Author: Chris Martin <chris@cmartinit.co.uk>
Closes#21901 from d80tb7/SPARK-24950_datetimeUtilsSuite_failures.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implements EXCEPT ALL clause through query rewrites using existing operators in Spark. In this PR, an internal UDTF (replicate_rows) is added to aid in preserving duplicate rows. Please refer to [Link](https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nyW0T0b_ajUduQoPgZLAsyHK8s3_dko3ulQuxaLpUXE) for the design.
**Note** This proposed UDTF is kept as a internal function that is purely used to aid with this particular rewrite to give us flexibility to change to a more generalized UDTF in future.
Input Query
``` SQL
SELECT c1 FROM ut1 EXCEPT ALL SELECT c1 FROM ut2
```
Rewritten Query
```SQL
SELECT c1
FROM (
SELECT replicate_rows(sum_val, c1)
FROM (
SELECT c1, sum_val
FROM (
SELECT c1, sum(vcol) AS sum_val
FROM (
SELECT 1L as vcol, c1 FROM ut1
UNION ALL
SELECT -1L as vcol, c1 FROM ut2
) AS union_all
GROUP BY union_all.c1
)
WHERE sum_val > 0
)
)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases in SQLQueryTestSuite, DataFrameSuite and SetOperationSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21857 from dilipbiswal/dkb_except_all_final.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I added new option for Avro datasource - `compression`. The option allows to specify compression codec for saved Avro files. This option is similar to `compression` option in another datasources like `JSON` and `CSV`.
Also I added the SQL configs `spark.sql.avro.compression.codec` and `spark.sql.avro.deflate.level`. I put the configs into `SQLConf`. If the `compression` option is not specified by an user, the first SQL config is taken into account.
## How was this patch tested?
I added new test which read meta info from written avro files and checks `avro.codec` property.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21837 from MaxGekk/avro-compression.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new collection function: shuffle. It generates a random permutation of the given array. This implementation uses the "inside-out" version of Fisher-Yates algorithm.
## How was this patch tested?
New tests are added to CollectionExpressionsSuite.scala and DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Author: pkuwm <ihuizhi.lu@gmail.com>
Closes#21802 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23928/shuffle.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a JDBC Option "pushDownPredicate" (default `true`) to allow/disallow predicate push-down in JDBC data source.
## How was this patch tested?
Add a test in `JDBCSuite`
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21875 from maryannxue/spark-24288.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AnalysisBarrier was introduced in SPARK-20392 to improve analysis speed (don't re-analyze nodes that have already been analyzed).
Before AnalysisBarrier, we already had some infrastructure in place, with analysis specific functions (resolveOperators and resolveExpressions). These functions do not recursively traverse down subplans that are already analyzed (with a mutable boolean flag _analyzed). The issue with the old system was that developers started using transformDown, which does a top-down traversal of the plan tree, because there was not top-down resolution function, and as a result analyzer performance became pretty bad.
In order to fix the issue in SPARK-20392, AnalysisBarrier was introduced as a special node and for this special node, transform/transformUp/transformDown don't traverse down. However, the introduction of this special node caused a lot more troubles than it solves. This implicit node breaks assumptions and code in a few places, and it's hard to know when analysis barrier would exist, and when it wouldn't. Just a simple search of AnalysisBarrier in PR discussions demonstrates it is a source of bugs and additional complexity.
Instead, this pull request removes AnalysisBarrier and reverts back to the old approach. We added infrastructure in tests that fail explicitly if transform methods are used in the analyzer.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test suite AnalysisHelperSuite for testing the resolve* methods and transform* methods.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21822 from rxin/SPARK-24865.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In most cases, we should use `spark.sessionState.newHadoopConf()` instead of `sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration`, so that the hadoop configurations specified in Spark session
configuration will come into effect.
Add a rule matching `spark.sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration` or `spark.sqlContext.sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration` to prevent the usage.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21873 from gengliangwang/linterRule.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is an extension to the original PR, in which rule exclusion did not work for classes derived from Optimizer, e.g., SparkOptimizer.
To solve this issue, Optimizer and its derived classes will define/override `defaultBatches` and `nonExcludableRules` in order to define its default rule set as well as rules that cannot be excluded by the SQL config. In the meantime, Optimizer's `batches` method is dedicated to the rule exclusion logic and is defined "final".
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21876 from maryannxue/rule-exclusion.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to the followings.
1. Like `com.databricks.spark.csv` mapping, we had better map `com.databricks.spark.avro` to built-in Avro data source.
2. Remove incorrect error message, `Please find an Avro package at ...`.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the newly added tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#21878 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-24924.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If we use `reverse` function for array type of primitive type containing `null` and the child array is `UnsafeArrayData`, the function returns a wrong result because `UnsafeArrayData` doesn't define the behavior of re-assignment, especially we can't set a valid value after we set `null`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21830 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-24878/fix_reverse.