MultilayerPerceptronClassifier had 4 occurrences
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: JBauerKogentix <37910022+JBauerKogentix@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#21030 from JBauerKogentix/patch-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds structured streaming tests using testTransformer for these suites:
* IDF
* Imputer
* Interaction
* MaxAbsScaler
* MinHashLSH
* MinMaxScaler
* NGram
## How was this patch tested?
It is a bunch of tests!
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes#20964 from jkbradley/SPARK-22883-part2.
The current in-process launcher implementation just calls the SparkSubmit
object, which, in case of errors, will more often than not exit the JVM.
This is not desirable since this launcher is meant to be used inside other
applications, and that would kill the application.
The change turns SparkSubmit into a class, and abstracts aways some of
the functionality used to print error messages and abort the submission
process. The default implementation uses the logging system for messages,
and throws exceptions for errors. As part of that I also moved some code
that doesn't really belong in SparkSubmit to a better location.
The command line invocation of spark-submit now uses a special implementation
of the SparkSubmit class that overrides those behaviors to do what is expected
from the command line version (print to the terminal, exit the JVM, etc).
A lot of the changes are to replace calls to methods such as "printErrorAndExit"
with the new API.
As part of adding tests for this, I had to fix some small things in the
launcher option parser so that things like "--version" can work when
used in the launcher library.
There is still code that prints directly to the terminal, like all the
Ivy-related code in SparkSubmitUtils, and other areas where some re-factoring
would help, like the CommandLineUtils class, but I chose to leave those
alone to keep this change more focused.
Aside from existing and added unit tests, I ran command line tools with
a bunch of different arguments to make sure messages and errors behave
like before.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#20925 from vanzin/SPARK-22941.
This change introduces two optimizations to help speed up generation
of listing data when parsing events logs.
The first one allows the parser to be stopped when enough data to
create the listing entry has been read. This is currently the start
event plus environment info, to capture UI ACLs. If the end event is
needed, the code will skip to the end of the log to try to find that
information, instead of parsing the whole log file.
Unfortunately this works better with uncompressed logs. Skipping bytes
on compressed logs only saves the work of parsing lines and some events,
so not a lot of gains are observed.
The second optimization deals with in-progress logs. It works in two
ways: first, it completely avoids parsing the rest of the log for
these apps when enough listing data is read. This, unlike the above,
also speeds things up for compressed logs, since only the very beginning
of the log has to be read.
On top of that, the code that decides whether to re-parse logs to get
updated listing data will ignore in-progress applications until they've
completed.
Both optimizations can be disabled but are enabled by default.
I tested this on some fake event logs to see the effect. I created
500 logs of about 60M each (so ~30G uncompressed; each log was 1.7M
when compressed with zstd). Below, C = completed, IP = in-progress,
the size means the amount of data re-parsed at the end of logs
when necessary.
```
none/C none/IP zstd/C zstd/IP
On / 16k 2s 2s 22s 2s
On / 1m 3s 2s 24s 2s
Off 1.1m 1.1m 26s 24s
```
This was with 4 threads on a single local SSD. As expected from the
previous explanations, there are considerable gains for in-progress
logs, and for uncompressed logs, but not so much when looking at the
full compressed log.
As a side note, I removed the custom code to get the scan time by
creating a file on HDFS; since file mod times are not used to detect
changed logs anymore, local time is enough for the current use of
the SHS.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#20952 from vanzin/SPARK-6951.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Mark `HashAggregateExec.bufVars` as transient to avoid it from being serialized.
Also manually null out this field at the end of `doProduceWithoutKeys()` to shorten its lifecycle, because it'll no longer be used after that.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Closes#21039 from rednaxelafx/codegen-improve.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR slightly refactors the newly added `ExprValue` API by quite a bit. The following changes are introduced:
1. `ExprValue` now uses the actual class instead of the class name as its type. This should give some more flexibility with generating code in the future.
2. Renamed `StatementValue` to `SimpleExprValue`. The statement concept is broader then an expression (untyped and it cannot be on the right hand side of an assignment), and this was not really what we were using it for. I have added a top level `JavaCode` trait that can be used in the future to reinstate (no pun intended) a statement a-like code fragment.
3. Added factory methods to the `JavaCode` companion object to make it slightly less verbose to create `JavaCode`/`ExprValue` objects. This is also what makes the diff quite large.
4. Added one more factory method to `ExprCode` to make it easier to create code-less expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#21026 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23951.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix `roxygen2` to `5.0.1` in `docs/README.md` for SparkR documentation generation.
If I use higher version and creates the doc, it shows the diff below. Not a big deal but it bothered me.
```diff
diff --git a/R/pkg/DESCRIPTION b/R/pkg/DESCRIPTION
index 855eb5bf77f..159fca61e06 100644
--- a/R/pkg/DESCRIPTION
+++ b/R/pkg/DESCRIPTION
-57,6 +57,6 Collate:
'types.R'
'utils.R'
'window.R'
-RoxygenNote: 5.0.1
+RoxygenNote: 6.0.1
VignetteBuilder: knitr
NeedsCompilation: no
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested. I met this every time I set the new environment for Spark dev but I have kept forgetting to fix it.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Closes#21020 from HyukjinKwon/minor-r-doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There was a mistake in `tests.py` missing `assertEquals`.
## How was this patch tested?
Fixed tests.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Closes#21035 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-23847.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add two set method for LSHModel in LSH.scala, BucketedRandomProjectionLSH.scala, and MinHashLSH.scala
## How was this patch tested?
New test for the param setup was added into
- BucketedRandomProjectionLSHSuite.scala
- MinHashLSHSuite.scala
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Lu WANG <lu.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21015 from ludatabricks/SPARK-23944.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add python api for VectorAssembler handleInvalid
## How was this patch tested?
Add doctest
Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21003 from huaxingao/spark-23871.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test Python API in `pyspark.ml`
**Note** API with `CDF` is a little difficult to support in python. We can add it in following PR.
## How was this patch tested?
doctest
Author: WeichenXu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Closes#20904 from WeichenXu123/ks-test-py.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR #20886, I mistakenly check the table location only when `ignoreIfExists` is false, which was following the original deprecated PR.
That was wrong. When `ignoreIfExists` is true and the target table doesn't exist, we should also check the table location. In other word, **`ignoreIfExists` has nothing to do with table location validation**.
This is a follow-up PR to fix the mistake.
## How was this patch tested?
Add one unit test.
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21001 from gengliangwang/SPARK-19724-followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR moves writing of `UnsafeRow`, `UnsafeArrayData` & `UnsafeMapData` out of the `GenerateUnsafeProjection`/`InterpretedUnsafeProjection` classes into the `UnsafeWriter` interface. This cleans up the code a little bit, and it should also result in less byte code for the code generated path.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#20986 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23864.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
unpersist the last cached nodeIdsForInstances in `deleteAllCheckpoints`
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Zheng RuiFeng <ruifengz@foxmail.com>
Closes#20956 from zhengruifeng/NodeIdCache_cleanup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Code generation for the `Add` and `Subtract` expressions was not done using the `BinaryArithmetic.doCodeGen` method because these expressions also support `CalendarInterval`. This leads to a bit of duplication.
This PR gets rid of that duplication by adding `calendarIntervalMethod` to `BinaryArithmetic` and doing the code generation for `CalendarInterval` in `BinaryArithmetic` instead.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#21005 from hvanhovell/SPARK-23898.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `hashUTF8String()` to the hasher classes to allow Spark SQL codegen to generate cleaner code for hashing `UTF8String`s. No change in behavior otherwise.
Although with the introduction of SPARK-10399, the code size for hashing `UTF8String` is already smaller, it's still good to extract a separate function in the hasher classes so that the generated code can stay clean.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Closes#21016 from rednaxelafx/hashutf8.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The codegen output of `Expression`, aka `ExprCode`, now encapsulates only strings of output value (`value`) and nullability (`isNull`). It makes difficulty for us to know what the output really is. I think it is better if we can add wrappers for the value and nullability that let us to easily know that.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20043 from viirya/SPARK-22856.
SPARK-19276 ensured that FetchFailures do not get swallowed by other
layers of exception handling, but it also meant that a killed task could
look like a fetch failure. This is particularly a problem with
speculative execution, where we expect to kill tasks as they are reading
shuffle data. The fix is to ensure that we always check for killed
tasks first.
Added a new unit test which fails before the fix, ran it 1k times to
check for flakiness. Full suite of tests on jenkins.
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes#20987 from squito/SPARK-23816.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The test case JobCancellationSuite."interruptible iterator of shuffle reader" has been flaky because `KillTask` event is handled asynchronously, so it can happen that the semaphore is released but the task is still running.
Actually we only have to check if the total number of processed elements is less than the input elements number, so we know the task get cancelled.
## How was this patch tested?
The new test case still fails without the purposed patch, and succeeded in current master.
Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Closes#20993 from jiangxb1987/JobCancellationSuite.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Nolan Emirot <nolan@turo.com>
Closes#20990 from emirot/kinesis_stream_example_typo.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoids possible overflow at an operation `long = (long)(int * int)`. The multiplication of large positive integer values may set one to MSB. This leads to a negative value in long while we expected a positive value (e.g. `0111_0000_0000_0000 * 0000_0000_0000_0010`).
This PR performs long cast before the multiplication to avoid this situation.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21002 from kiszk/SPARK-23893.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves test coverage in `UTF8StringSuite` and code efficiency in `UTF8StringPropertyCheckSuite`.
This PR also fixes lint-java issue in `UTF8StringSuite` reported at [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20995#issuecomment-379325527)
```[ERROR] src/test/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8StringSuite.java:[28,8] (imports) UnusedImports: Unused import - org.apache.spark.unsafe.Platform.```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UT
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21000 from kiszk/SPARK-23892.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Proposed tests checks that only subset of input dataset is touched during schema inferring.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#20963 from MaxGekk/json-sampling-tests.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Column.scala and Functions.scala have asc_nulls_first, asc_nulls_last, desc_nulls_first and desc_nulls_last. Add the corresponding python APIs in column.py and functions.py
## How was this patch tested?
Add doctest
Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Closes#20962 from huaxingao/spark-23847.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr of #19108 which broke Scala 2.12 build.
```
[error] /Users/ueshin/workspace/apache-spark/spark/mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/KolmogorovSmirnovTest.scala:86: overloaded method value test with alternatives:
[error] (dataset: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame,sampleCol: String,cdf: org.apache.spark.api.java.function.Function[java.lang.Double,java.lang.Double])org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame <and>
[error] (dataset: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame,sampleCol: String,cdf: scala.Double => scala.Double)org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame
[error] cannot be applied to (org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame, String, scala.Double => java.lang.Double)
[error] test(dataset, sampleCol, (x: Double) => cdf.call(x))
[error] ^
[error] one error found
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#20994 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-21898/fix_scala-2.12.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The Scala StringIndexerModel has an alternate constructor that will create the model from an array of label strings. Add the corresponding Python API:
model = StringIndexerModel.from_labels(["a", "b", "c"])
## How was this patch tested?
Add doctest and unit test.
Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Closes#20968 from huaxingao/spark-23828.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Initial PR for Instrumentation improvements: UUID and logging levels.
This PR takes over #20837Closes#20837
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Author: Bago Amirbekian <bago@databricks.com>
Author: WeichenXu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Closes#20982 from WeichenXu123/better-instrumentation.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR excludes an existing UT [`writeToOutputStreamUnderflow()`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/common/unsafe/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8StringSuite.java#L519-L532) in `UTF8StringSuite`.
As discussed [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222#discussion_r177692142), the behavior of this test looks surprising. This test seems to access metadata area of the JVM object where is reserved by `Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET`.
This test is introduced thru #16089 by NathanHowell. More specifically, [the commit](27c102deb1) `Improve test coverage of UTFString.write` introduced this UT. However, I cannot find any discussion about this UT.
I think that it would be good to exclude this UT.
```java
public void writeToOutputStreamUnderflow() throws IOException {
// offset underflow is apparently supported?
final ByteArrayOutputStream outputStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
final byte[] test = "01234567".getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
for (int i = 1; i <= Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET; ++i) {
new UTF8String(
new ByteArrayMemoryBlock(test, Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET - i, test.length + i))
.writeTo(outputStream);
final ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.wrap(outputStream.toByteArray(), i, test.length);
assertEquals("01234567", StandardCharsets.UTF_8.decode(buffer).toString());
outputStream.reset();
}
}
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20995 from kiszk/SPARK-23882.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add docstring to clarify default window frame boundaries with and without orderBy clause
## How was this patch tested?
Manually generate doc and check.
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Closes#20978 from icexelloss/SPARK-23861-window-doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request tries to improve the error message for spark while reading parquet files with different schemas, e.g. One with a STRING column and the other with a INT column. A new ParquetSchemaColumnConvertNotSupportedException is added to replace the old UnsupportedOperationException. The Exception is again wrapped in FileScanRdd.scala to throw a more a general QueryExecutionException with the actual parquet file name which trigger the exception.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests added to check the new exception and verify the error messages.
Also manually tested with two parquet with different schema to check the error message.
<img width="1125" alt="screen shot 2018-03-30 at 4 03 04 pm" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/37087310/38156580-dd58a140-3433-11e8-973a-b816d859fbe1.png">
Author: Yuchen Huo <yuchen.huo@databricks.com>
Closes#20953 from yuchenhuo/SPARK-23822.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Easy fix in the documentation.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#20948
Author: Daniel Sakuma <dsakuma@gmail.com>
Closes#20928 from dsakuma/fix_typo_configuration_docs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to finish https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17272
This JIRA is a follow up work after SPARK-19583
As we discussed in that PR
The following DDL for a managed table with an existed default location should throw an exception:
CREATE TABLE ... (PARTITIONED BY ...) AS SELECT ...
CREATE TABLE ... (PARTITIONED BY ...)
Currently there are some situations which are not consist with above logic:
CREATE TABLE ... (PARTITIONED BY ...) succeed with an existed default location
situation: for both hive/datasource(with HiveExternalCatalog/InMemoryCatalog)
CREATE TABLE ... (PARTITIONED BY ...) AS SELECT ...
situation: hive table succeed with an existed default location
This PR is going to make above two situations consist with the logic that it should throw an exception
with an existed default location.
## How was this patch tested?
unit test added
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#20886 from gengliangwang/pr-17272.
Fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23823
Keep origin for all the methods using transformExpression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Keep origin in transformExpression
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested that this fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23823 and columns have correct origins after Analyzer.analyze
Author: JiahuiJiang <jjiang@palantir.com>
Author: Jiahui Jiang <jjiang@palantir.com>
Closes#20961 from JiahuiJiang/jj/keep-origin.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`handleInvalid` Param was forwarded to the VectorAssembler used by RFormula.
## How was this patch tested?
added a test and ran all tests for RFormula and VectorAssembler
Author: Yogesh Garg <yogesh(dot)garg()databricks(dot)com>
Closes#20970 from yogeshg/spark_23562.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allows us to use one of several types of `MemoryBlock`, such as byte array, int array, long array, or `java.nio.DirectByteBuffer`. To use `java.nio.DirectByteBuffer` allows to have off heap memory which is automatically deallocated by JVM. `MemoryBlock` class has primitive accessors like `Platform.getInt()`, `Platform.putint()`, or `Platform.copyMemory()`.
This PR uses `MemoryBlock` for `OffHeapColumnVector`, `UTF8String`, and other places. This PR can improve performance of operations involving memory accesses (e.g. `UTF8String.trim`) by 1.8x.
For now, this PR does not use `MemoryBlock` for `BufferHolder` based on cloud-fan's [suggestion](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11494#issuecomment-309694290).
Since this PR is a successor of #11494, close#11494. Many codes were ported from #11494. Many efforts were put here. **I think this PR should credit to yzotov.**
This PR can achieve **1.1-1.4x performance improvements** for operations in `UTF8String` or `Murmur3_x86_32`. Other operations are almost comparable performances.
Without this PR
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2-b13 on Linux 4.4.0-22-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2-b13 on Linux 4.4.0-22-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Hash byte arrays with length 268435487: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Murmur3_x86_32 526 / 536 0.0 131399881.5 1.0X
UTF8String benchmark: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hashCode 525 / 552 1022.6 1.0 1.0X
substring 414 / 423 1298.0 0.8 1.3X
```
With this PR
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2-b13 on Linux 4.4.0-22-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Hash byte arrays with length 268435487: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Murmur3_x86_32 474 / 488 0.0 118552232.0 1.0X
UTF8String benchmark: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hashCode 476 / 480 1127.3 0.9 1.0X
substring 287 / 291 1869.9 0.5 1.7X
```
Benchmark program
```
test("benchmark Murmur3_x86_32") {
val length = 8192 * 32768 + 31
val seed = 42L
val iters = 1 << 2
val random = new Random(seed)
val arrays = Array.fill[MemoryBlock](numArrays) {
val bytes = new Array[Byte](length)
random.nextBytes(bytes)
new ByteArrayMemoryBlock(bytes, Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET, length)
}
val benchmark = new Benchmark("Hash byte arrays with length " + length,
iters * numArrays, minNumIters = 20)
benchmark.addCase("HiveHasher") { _: Int =>
var sum = 0L
for (_ <- 0L until iters) {
sum += HiveHasher.hashUnsafeBytesBlock(
arrays(i), Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET, length)
}
}
benchmark.run()
}
test("benchmark UTF8String") {
val N = 512 * 1024 * 1024
val iters = 2
val benchmark = new Benchmark("UTF8String benchmark", N, minNumIters = 20)
val str0 = new java.io.StringWriter() { { for (i <- 0 until N) { write(" ") } } }.toString
val s0 = UTF8String.fromString(str0)
benchmark.addCase("hashCode") { _: Int =>
var h: Int = 0
for (_ <- 0L until iters) { h += s0.hashCode }
}
benchmark.addCase("substring") { _: Int =>
var s: UTF8String = null
for (_ <- 0L until iters) { s = s0.substring(N / 2 - 5, N / 2 + 5) }
}
benchmark.run()
}
```
I run [this benchmark program](https://gist.github.com/kiszk/94f75b506c93a663bbbc372ffe8f05de) using [the commit](ee5a79861c). I got the following results:
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2-b12 on Linux 4.4.0-66-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Memory access benchmarks: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ByteArrayMemoryBlock get/putInt() 220 / 221 609.3 1.6 1.0X
Platform get/putInt(byte[]) 220 / 236 610.9 1.6 1.0X
Platform get/putInt(Object) 492 / 494 272.8 3.7 0.4X
OnHeapMemoryBlock get/putLong() 322 / 323 416.5 2.4 0.7X
long[] 221 / 221 608.0 1.6 1.0X
Platform get/putLong(long[]) 321 / 321 418.7 2.4 0.7X
Platform get/putLong(Object) 561 / 563 239.2 4.2 0.4X
```
I also run [this benchmark program](https://gist.github.com/kiszk/5fdb4e03733a5d110421177e289d1fb5) for comparing performance of `Platform.copyMemory()`.
```
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2-b12 on Linux 4.4.0-66-generic
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 3.20GHz
Platform copyMemory: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Object to Object 1961 / 1967 8.6 116.9 1.0X
System.arraycopy Object to Object 1917 / 1921 8.8 114.3 1.0X
byte array to byte array 1961 / 1968 8.6 116.9 1.0X
System.arraycopy byte array to byte array 1909 / 1937 8.8 113.8 1.0X
int array to int array 1921 / 1990 8.7 114.5 1.0X
double array to double array 1918 / 1923 8.7 114.3 1.0X
Object to byte array 1961 / 1967 8.6 116.9 1.0X
Object to short array 1965 / 1972 8.5 117.1 1.0X
Object to int array 1910 / 1915 8.8 113.9 1.0X
Object to float array 1971 / 1978 8.5 117.5 1.0X
Object to double array 1919 / 1944 8.7 114.4 1.0X
byte array to Object 1959 / 1967 8.6 116.8 1.0X
int array to Object 1961 / 1970 8.6 116.9 1.0X
double array to Object 1917 / 1924 8.8 114.3 1.0X
```
These results show three facts:
1. According to the second/third or sixth/seventh results in the first experiment, if we use `Platform.get/putInt(Object)`, we achieve more than 2x worse performance than `Platform.get/putInt(byte[])` with concrete type (i.e. `byte[]`).
2. According to the second/third or fourth/fifth/sixth results in the first experiment, the fastest way to access an array element on Java heap is `array[]`. **Cons of `array[]` is that it is not possible to support unaligned-8byte access.**
3. According to the first/second/third or fourth/sixth/seventh results in the first experiment, `getInt()/putInt() or getLong()/putLong()` in subclasses of `MemoryBlock` can achieve comparable performance to `Platform.get/putInt()` or `Platform.get/putLong()` with concrete type (second or sixth result). There is no overhead regarding virtual call.
4. According to results in the second experiment, for `Platform.copy()`, to pass `Object` can achieve the same performance as to pass any type of primitive array as source or destination.
5. According to second/fourth results in the second experiment, `Platform.copy()` can achieve the same performance as `System.arrayCopy`. **It would be good to use `Platform.copy()` since `Platform.copy()` can take any types for src and dst.**
We are incrementally replace `Platform.get/putXXX` with `MemoryBlock.get/putXXX`. This is because we have two advantages.
1) Achieve better performance due to having a concrete type for an array.
2) Use simple OO design instead of passing `Object`
It is easy to use `MemoryBlock` in `InternalRow`, `BufferHolder`, `TaskMemoryManager`, and others that are already abstracted. It is not easy to use `MemoryBlock` in utility classes related to hashing or others.
Other candidates are
- UnsafeRow, UnsafeArrayData, UnsafeMapData, SpecificUnsafeRowJoiner
- UTF8StringBuffer
- BufferHolder
- TaskMemoryManager
- OnHeapColumnVector
- BytesToBytesMap
- CachedBatch
- classes for hash
- others.
## How was this patch tested?
Added `UnsafeMemoryAllocator`
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#19222 from kiszk/SPARK-10399.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add interpreted execution for `InitializeJavaBean` expression.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20985 from viirya/SPARK-23593-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added interpreted execution for `StaticInvoke`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20753 from kiszk/SPARK-23582.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add interpreted execution for `InitializeJavaBean` expression.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#20756 from viirya/SPARK-23593.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`YarnAllocator` uses `numExecutorsRunning` to track the number of running executor. `numExecutorsRunning` is used to check if there're executors missing and need to allocate more.
In current code, `numExecutorsRunning` can be negative when driver asks to kill a same idle executor multiple times.
## How was this patch tested?
UT added
Author: jinxing <jinxing6042@126.com>
Closes#20781 from jinxing64/SPARK-23637.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Pass through the `imagePullSecrets` option to the k8s pod in order to allow user to access private image registries.
See https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/pull-image-private-registry/
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests + manual testing.
Manual testing procedure:
1. Have private image registry.
2. Spark-submit application with no `spark.kubernetes.imagePullSecret` set. Do `kubectl describe pod ...`. See the error message:
```
Error syncing pod, skipping: failed to "StartContainer" for "spark-kubernetes-driver" with ErrImagePull: "rpc error: code = 2 desc = Error: Status 400 trying to pull repository ...: \"{\\n \\\"errors\\\" : [ {\\n \\\"status\\\" : 400,\\n \\\"message\\\" : \\\"Unsupported docker v1 repository request for '...'\\\"\\n } ]\\n}\""
```
3. Create secret `kubectl create secret docker-registry ...`
4. Spark-submit with `spark.kubernetes.imagePullSecret` set to the new secret. See that deployment was successful.
Author: Andrew Korzhuev <andrew.korzhuev@klarna.com>
Author: Andrew Korzhuev <korzhuev@andrusha.me>
Closes#20811 from andrusha/spark-23668-image-pull-secrets.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added interpreted execution for `Invoke`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ObjectExpressionsSuite`.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#20797 from kiszk/SPARK-28583.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In TestHive, the base spark session does this in getOrCreate(), we emulate that behavior for tests.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20969 from gatorsmile/setDefault.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add cast to nulls introduced by PropagateEmptyRelation so in cases they're part of coalesce they will not break its type checking rules
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test
Author: Robert Kruszewski <robertk@palantir.com>
Closes#20914 from robert3005/rk/propagate-empty-fix.
