Include the following changes:
1. Close `java.sql.Statement`
2. Fix incorrect `asInstanceOf`.
3. Remove unnecessary `synchronized` and `ReentrantLock`.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#10440 from zsxwing/findbugs.
When explain any plan with Generate, we will see an exclamation mark in the plan. Normally, when we see this mark, it means the plan has an error. This PR is to correct the `missingInput` in `Generate`.
For example,
```scala
val df = Seq((1, "a b c"), (2, "a b"), (3, "a")).toDF("number", "letters")
val df2 =
df.explode('letters) {
case Row(letters: String) => letters.split(" ").map(Tuple1(_)).toSeq
}
df2.explain(true)
```
Before the fix, the plan is like
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Generate UserDefinedGenerator('letters), true, false, None
+- Project [_1#0 AS number#2,_2#1 AS letters#3]
+- LocalRelation [_1#0,_2#1], [[1,a b c],[2,a b],[3,a]]
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
number: int, letters: string, _1: string
Generate UserDefinedGenerator(letters#3), true, false, None, [_1#8]
+- Project [_1#0 AS number#2,_2#1 AS letters#3]
+- LocalRelation [_1#0,_2#1], [[1,a b c],[2,a b],[3,a]]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Generate UserDefinedGenerator(letters#3), true, false, None, [_1#8]
+- LocalRelation [number#2,letters#3], [[1,a b c],[2,a b],[3,a]]
== Physical Plan ==
!Generate UserDefinedGenerator(letters#3), true, false, [number#2,letters#3,_1#8]
+- LocalTableScan [number#2,letters#3], [[1,a b c],[2,a b],[3,a]]
```
**Updates**: The same issues are also found in the other four Dataset operators: `MapPartitions`/`AppendColumns`/`MapGroups`/`CoGroup`. Fixed all these four.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10393 from gatorsmile/generateExplain.
Support Unsafe Row in MapPartitions/MapGroups/CoGroup.
Added a test case for MapPartitions. Since MapGroups and CoGroup are built on AppendColumns, all the related dataset test cases already can verify the correctness when MapGroups and CoGroup processing unsafe rows.
davies cloud-fan Not sure if my understanding is right, please correct me. Thank you!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10398 from gatorsmile/unsafeRowMapGroup.
Hello Michael & All:
We have some issues to submit the new codes in the other PR(#10299), so we closed that PR and open this one with the fix.
The reason for the previous failure is that the projection for the scan when there is a filter that is not pushed down (the "left-over" filter) could be different, in elements or ordering, from the original projection.
With this new codes, the approach to solve this problem is:
Insert a new Project if the "left-over" filter is nonempty and (the original projection is not empty and the projection for the scan has more than one elements which could otherwise cause different ordering in projection).
We create 3 test cases to cover the otherwise failure cases.
Author: Kevin Yu <qyu@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10388 from kevinyu98/spark-12231.
This PR is a follow-up of PR #10362.
Two major changes:
1. The fix introduced in #10362 is OK for Parquet, but may disable ORC PPD in many cases
PR #10362 stops converting an `AND` predicate if any branch is inconvertible. On the other hand, `OrcFilters` combines all filters into a single big conjunction first and then tries to convert it into ORC `SearchArgument`. This means, if any filter is inconvertible, no filters can be pushed down. This PR fixes this issue by finding out all convertible filters first before doing the actual conversion.
The reason behind the current implementation is mostly due to the limitation of ORC `SearchArgument` builder, which is documented in this PR in detail.
1. Copied the `AND` predicate fix for ORC from #10362 to avoid merge conflict.
Same as #10362, this PR targets master (2.0.0-SNAPSHOT), branch-1.6, and branch-1.5.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10377 from liancheng/spark-12218.fix-orc-conjunction-ppd.
In the past Spark JDBC write only worked with technologies which support the following INSERT statement syntax (JdbcUtils.scala: insertStatement()):
INSERT INTO $table VALUES ( ?, ?, ..., ? )
But some technologies require a list of column names:
INSERT INTO $table ( $colNameList ) VALUES ( ?, ?, ..., ? )
This was blocking the use of e.g. the Progress JDBC Driver for Cassandra.
Another limitation is that syntax 1 relies no the dataframe field ordering match that of the target table. This works fine, as long as the target table has been created by writer.jdbc().
If the target table contains more columns (not created by writer.jdbc()), then the insert fails due mismatch of number of columns or their data types.
This PR switches to the recommended second INSERT syntax. Column names are taken from datafram field names.
Author: CK50 <christian.kurz@oracle.com>
Closes#10380 from CK50/master-SPARK-12010-2.
Accessing null elements in an array field fails when tungsten is enabled.
It works in Spark 1.3.1, and in Spark > 1.5 with Tungsten disabled.
This PR solves this by checking if the accessed element in the array field is null, in the generated code.
Example:
```
// Array of String
case class AS( as: Seq[String] )
val dfAS = sc.parallelize( Seq( AS ( Seq("a",null,"b") ) ) ).toDF
dfAS.registerTempTable("T_AS")
for (i <- 0 to 2) { println(i + " = " + sqlContext.sql(s"select as[$i] from T_AS").collect.mkString(","))}
```
With Tungsten disabled:
```
0 = [a]
1 = [null]
2 = [b]
```
With Tungsten enabled:
```
0 = [a]
15/12/22 09:32:50 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 7.0 in stage 1.0 (TID 15)
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRowWriters$UTF8StringWriter.getSize(UnsafeRowWriters.java:90)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$SpecificUnsafeProjection.apply(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.TungstenProject$$anonfun$3$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(basicOperators.scala:90)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.TungstenProject$$anonfun$3$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(basicOperators.scala:88)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:328)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:328)
at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:727)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1157)
```
Author: pierre-borckmans <pierre.borckmans@realimpactanalytics.com>
Closes#10429 from pierre-borckmans/SPARK-12477_Tungsten-Projection-Null-Element-In-Array.
When the filter is ```"b in ('1', '2')"```, the filter is not pushed down to Parquet. Thanks!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#10278 from gatorsmile/parquetFilterNot.
When creating extractors for product types (i.e. case classes and tuples), a null check is missing, thus we always assume input product values are non-null.
This PR adds a null check in the extractor expression for product types. The null check is stripped off for top level product fields, which are mapped to the outermost `Row`s, since they can't be null.
Thanks cloud-fan for helping investigating this issue!
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10431 from liancheng/spark-12478.top-level-null-field.
This PR adds a new expression `AssertNotNull` to ensure non-nullable fields of products and case classes don't receive null values at runtime.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#10331 from liancheng/dataset-nullability-check.
According the benchmark [1], LZ4-java could be 80% (or 30%) faster than Snappy.
After changing the compressor to LZ4, I saw 20% improvement on end-to-end time for a TPCDS query (Q4).
[1] https://github.com/ning/jvm-compressor-benchmark/wiki
cc rxin
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10342 from davies/lz4.
Updates made in SPARK-11206 missed an edge case which cause's a NullPointerException when a task is killed. In some cases when a task ends in failure taskMetrics is initialized as null (see JobProgressListener.onTaskEnd()). To address this a null check was added. Before the changes in SPARK-11206 this null check was called at the start of the updateTaskAccumulatorValues() function.
Author: Alex Bozarth <ajbozart@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10405 from ajbozarth/spark12339.
Based on the suggestions from marmbrus , added logical/physical operators for Range for improving the performance.
Also added another API for resolving the JIRA Spark-12150.
Could you take a look at my implementation, marmbrus ? If not good, I can rework it. : )
Thank you very much!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10335 from gatorsmile/rangeOperators.
When a DataFrame or Dataset has a long schema, we should intelligently truncate to avoid flooding the screen with unreadable information.
// Standard output
[a: int, b: int]
// Truncate many top level fields
[a: int, b, string ... 10 more fields]
// Truncate long inner structs
[a: struct<a: Int ... 10 more fields>]
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#10373 from dilipbiswal/spark-12398.
Now `StaticInvoke` receives `Any` as a object and `StaticInvoke` can be serialized but sometimes the object passed is not serializable.
For example, following code raises Exception because `RowEncoder#extractorsFor` invoked indirectly makes `StaticInvoke`.
```
case class TimestampContainer(timestamp: java.sql.Timestamp)
val rdd = sc.parallelize(1 to 2).map(_ => TimestampContainer(System.currentTimeMillis))
val df = rdd.toDF
val ds = df.as[TimestampContainer]
val rdd2 = ds.rdd <----------------- invokes extractorsFor indirectory
```
I'll add test cases.
Author: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#10357 from sarutak/SPARK-12404.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12218
When creating filters for Parquet/ORC, we should not push nested AND expressions partially.
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#10362 from yhuai/SPARK-12218.
This could simplify the generated code for expressions that is not nullable.
This PR fix lots of bugs about nullability.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10333 from davies/skip_nullable.
Description of the problem from cloud-fan
Actually this line: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/branch-1.5/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala#L689
When we use `selectExpr`, we pass in `UnresolvedFunction` to `DataFrame.select` and fall in the last case. A workaround is to do special handling for UDTF like we did for `explode`(and `json_tuple` in 1.6), wrap it with `MultiAlias`.
Another workaround is using `expr`, for example, `df.select(expr("explode(a)").as(Nil))`, I think `selectExpr` is no longer needed after we have the `expr` function....
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#9981 from dilipbiswal/spark-11619.
Hide the error logs for 'SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite' to avoid noises. Most of changes are space changes.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#10363 from zsxwing/hide-log.
This PR removes Hive windows functions from Spark and replaces them with (native) Spark ones. The PR is on par with Hive in terms of features.
This has the following advantages:
* Better memory management.
* The ability to use spark UDAFs in Window functions.
cc rxin / yhuai
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#9819 from hvanhovell/SPARK-8641-2.
Since we rename the column name from ```text``` to ```value``` for DataFrame load by ```SQLContext.read.text```, we need to update doc.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes#10349 from yanboliang/text-value.
For API DataFrame.join(right, usingColumns, joinType), if the joinType is right_outer or full_outer, the resulting join columns could be wrong (will be null).
The order of columns had been changed to match that with MySQL and PostgreSQL [1].
This PR also fix the nullability of output for outer join.
[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/queries-table-expressions.html
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10353 from davies/fix_join.
This PR makes JSON parser and schema inference handle more cases where we have unparsed records. It is based on #10043. The last commit fixes the failed test and updates the logic of schema inference.
Regarding the schema inference change, if we have something like
```
{"f1":1}
[1,2,3]
```
originally, we will get a DF without any column.
After this change, we will get a DF with columns `f1` and `_corrupt_record`. Basically, for the second row, `[1,2,3]` will be the value of `_corrupt_record`.
When merge this PR, please make sure that the author is simplyianm.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12057Closes#10043
Author: Ian Macalinao <me@ian.pw>
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes#10288 from yhuai/handleCorruptJson.
Based on the suggestions from marmbrus cloud-fan in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10165 , this PR is to print the decoded values(user objects) in `Dataset.show`
```scala
implicit val kryoEncoder = Encoders.kryo[KryoClassData]
val ds = Seq(KryoClassData("a", 1), KryoClassData("b", 2), KryoClassData("c", 3)).toDS()
ds.show(20, false);
```
The current output is like
```
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|value |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|[1, 0, 111, 114, 103, 46, 97, 112, 97, 99, 104, 101, 46, 115, 112, 97, 114, 107, 46, 115, 113, 108, 46, 75, 114, 121, 111, 67, 108, 97, 115, 115, 68, 97, 116, -31, 1, 1, -126, 97, 2]|
|[1, 0, 111, 114, 103, 46, 97, 112, 97, 99, 104, 101, 46, 115, 112, 97, 114, 107, 46, 115, 113, 108, 46, 75, 114, 121, 111, 67, 108, 97, 115, 115, 68, 97, 116, -31, 1, 1, -126, 98, 4]|
|[1, 0, 111, 114, 103, 46, 97, 112, 97, 99, 104, 101, 46, 115, 112, 97, 114, 107, 46, 115, 113, 108, 46, 75, 114, 121, 111, 67, 108, 97, 115, 115, 68, 97, 116, -31, 1, 1, -126, 99, 6]|
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
After the fix, it will be like the below if and only if the users override the `toString` function in the class `KryoClassData`
```scala
override def toString: String = s"KryoClassData($a, $b)"
```
```
+-------------------+
|value |
+-------------------+
|KryoClassData(a, 1)|
|KryoClassData(b, 2)|
|KryoClassData(c, 3)|
+-------------------+
```
If users do not override the `toString` function, the results will be like
```
+---------------------------------------+
|value |
+---------------------------------------+
|org.apache.spark.sql.KryoClassData68ef|
|org.apache.spark.sql.KryoClassData6915|
|org.apache.spark.sql.KryoClassData693b|
+---------------------------------------+
```
Question: Should we add another optional parameter in the function `show`? It will decide if the function `show` will display the hex values or the object values?
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10215 from gatorsmile/showDecodedValue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12249
Currently `!=` operator is not pushed down correctly.
I simply added a case for this.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#10233 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-12249.
This is continuation of SPARK-12056 where change is applied to SqlNewHadoopRDD.scala
andrewor14
FYI
Author: tedyu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
Closes#10164 from tedyu/master.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12236
Currently JDBC filters are not tested properly. All the tests pass even if the filters are not pushed down due to Spark-side filtering.
In this PR,
Firstly, I corrected the tests to properly check the pushed down filters by removing Spark-side filtering.
Also, `!=` was being tested which is actually not pushed down. So I removed them.
Lastly, I moved the `stripSparkFilter()` function to `SQLTestUtils` as this functions would be shared for all tests for pushed down filters. This function would be also shared with ORC datasource as the filters for that are also not being tested properly.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#10221 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-12236.
Support UnsafeRow for the Coalesce/Except/Intersect.
Could you review if my code changes are ok? davies Thank you!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10285 from gatorsmile/unsafeSupportCIE.
marmbrus This PR is to address your comment. Thanks for your review!
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#10214 from gatorsmile/followup12188.
When SparkStrategies.BasicOperators's "case BroadcastHint(child) => apply(child)" is hit, it only recursively invokes BasicOperators.apply with this "child". It makes many strategies have no change to process this plan, which probably leads to "No plan" issue, so we use planLater to go through all strategies.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12275
Author: yucai <yucai.yu@intel.com>
Closes#10265 from yucai/broadcast_hint.
Currently, we could generate different plans for query with single distinct (depends on spark.sql.specializeSingleDistinctAggPlanning), one works better on low cardinality columns, the other
works better for high cardinality column (default one).
This PR change to generate a single plan (three aggregations and two exchanges), which work better in both cases, then we could safely remove the flag `spark.sql.specializeSingleDistinctAggPlanning` (introduced in 1.6).
For a query like `SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT a) FROM table` will be
```
AGG-4 (count distinct)
Shuffle to a single reducer
Partial-AGG-3 (count distinct, no grouping)
Partial-AGG-2 (grouping on a)
Shuffle by a
Partial-AGG-1 (grouping on a)
```
This PR also includes large refactor for aggregation (reduce 500+ lines of code)
cc yhuai nongli marmbrus
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#10228 from davies/single_distinct.
Modifies the String overload to call the Column overload and ensures this is called in a test.
Author: Ankur Dave <ankurdave@gmail.com>
Closes#10271 from ankurdave/SPARK-12298.
This patch adds documentation for Spark configurations that affect off-heap memory and makes some naming and validation improvements for those configs.
- Change `spark.memory.offHeapSize` to `spark.memory.offHeap.size`. This is fine because this configuration has not shipped in any Spark release yet (it's new in Spark 1.6).
- Deprecated `spark.unsafe.offHeap` in favor of a new `spark.memory.offHeap.enabled` configuration. The motivation behind this change is to gather all memory-related configurations under the same prefix.
- Add a check which prevents users from setting `spark.memory.offHeap.enabled=true` when `spark.memory.offHeap.size == 0`. After SPARK-11389 (#9344), which was committed in Spark 1.6, Spark enforces a hard limit on the amount of off-heap memory that it will allocate to tasks. As a result, enabling off-heap execution memory without setting `spark.memory.offHeap.size` will lead to immediate OOMs. The new configuration validation makes this scenario easier to diagnose, helping to avoid user confusion.
- Document these configurations on the configuration page.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#10237 from JoshRosen/SPARK-12251.
