## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
onQueryProgress is asynchronous so the user may see some future status of `ContinuousQuery`. This PR just updated comments to warn it.
## How was this patch tested?
Only updated comments.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#12180 from zsxwing/ContinuousQueryListener-doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark 2.0, we want to handle the most common `ALTER TABLE` commands ourselves instead of passing the entire query text to Hive. This is done using the new `SessionCatalog` API introduced recently.
The commands supported in this patch include:
```
ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO ...
ALTER TABLE ... SET TBLPROPERTIES ...
ALTER TABLE ... UNSET TBLPROPERTIES ...
ALTER TABLE ... SET LOCATION ...
ALTER TABLE ... SET SERDE ...
```
The commands we explicitly do not support are:
```
ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTERED BY ...
ALTER TABLE ... SKEWED BY ...
ALTER TABLE ... NOT CLUSTERED
ALTER TABLE ... NOT SORTED
ALTER TABLE ... NOT SKEWED
ALTER TABLE ... NOT STORED AS DIRECTORIES
```
For these we throw exceptions complaining that they are not supported.
## How was this patch tested?
`DDLSuite`
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes#12121 from andrewor14/alter-table-ddl.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `window` function was added to Dataset with [this PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12008).
This PR adds the Python, and SQL, API for this function.
With this PR, SQL, Java, and Scala will share the same APIs as in users can use:
- `window(timeColumn, windowDuration)`
- `window(timeColumn, windowDuration, slideDuration)`
- `window(timeColumn, windowDuration, slideDuration, startTime)`
In Python, users can access all APIs above, but in addition they can do
- In Python:
`window(timeColumn, windowDuration, startTime=...)`
that is, they can provide the startTime without providing the `slideDuration`. In this case, we will generate tumbling windows.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests + manual tests
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#12136 from brkyvz/python-windows.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements CreateFunction and DropFunction commands. Besides implementing these two commands, we also change how to manage functions. Here are the main changes.
* `FunctionRegistry` will be a container to store all functions builders and it will not actively load any functions. Because of this change, we do not need to maintain a separate registry for HiveContext. So, `HiveFunctionRegistry` is deleted.
* SessionCatalog takes care the job of loading a function if this function is not in the `FunctionRegistry` but its metadata is stored in the external catalog. For this case, SessionCatalog will (1) load the metadata from the external catalog, (2) load all needed resources (i.e. jars and files), (3) create a function builder based on the function definition, (4) register the function builder in the `FunctionRegistry`.
* A `UnresolvedGenerator` is created. So, the parser will not need to call `FunctionRegistry` directly during parsing, which is not a good time to create a Hive UDTF. In the analysis phase, we will resolve `UnresolvedGenerator`.
This PR is based on viirya's https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12036/
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and new tests.
## TODOs
[x] Self-review
[x] Cleanup
[x] More tests for create/drop functions (we need to more tests for permanent functions).
[ ] File JIRAs for all TODOs
[x] Standardize the error message when a function does not exist.
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#12117 from yhuai/function.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make StreamingRelation store the closure to create the source in StreamExecution so that we can start multiple continuous queries from the same DataFrame.
## How was this patch tested?
`test("DataFrame reuse")`
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#12049 from zsxwing/df-reuse.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds Native execution of SHOW TBLPROPERTIES command.
Command Syntax:
``` SQL
SHOW TBLPROPERTIES table_name[(property_key_literal)]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Tests added in HiveComandSuiie and DDLCommandSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#12133 from dilipbiswal/dkb_show_tblproperties.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds the corresponding Java static functions for built-in typed aggregates already exposed in Scala.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests.
rxin
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#12168 from ericl/sc-2794.
With the addition of StreamExecution (ContinuousQuery) to Datasets, data will become unbounded. With unbounded data, the execution of some methods and operations will not make sense, e.g. `Dataset.count()`.
A simple API is required to check whether the data in a Dataset is bounded or unbounded. This will allow users to check whether their Dataset is in streaming mode or not. ML algorithms may check if the data is unbounded and throw an exception for example.
The implementation of this method is simple, however naming it is the challenge. Some possible names for this method are:
- isStreaming
- isContinuous
- isBounded
- isUnbounded
I've gone with `isStreaming` for now. We can change it before Spark 2.0 if we decide to come up with a different name. For that reason I've marked it as `Experimental`
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#12080 from brkyvz/is-streaming.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR basically re-do the things in #12068 but with a different model, which should work better in case of small files with different sizes.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated existing tests.
Ran a query on thousands of partitioned small files locally, with all default settings (the cost to open a file should be over estimated), the durations of tasks become smaller and smaller, which is good (the last few tasks will be shortest).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12095 from davies/file_cost.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
RDD.toLocalIterator() could be used to fetch one partition at a time to reduce the memory usage. Right now, for Dataset/Dataframe we have to use df.rdd.toLocalIterator, which is super slow also requires lots of memory (because of the Java serializer or even Kyro serializer).
This PR introduce an optimized toLocalIterator for Dataset/DataFrame, which is much faster and requires much less memory. For a partition with 5 millions rows, `df.rdd.toIterator` took about 100 seconds, but df.toIterator took less than 7 seconds. For 10 millions row, rdd.toIterator will crash (not enough memory) with 4G heap, but df.toLocalIterator could finished in 12 seconds.
The JDBC server has been updated to use DataFrame.toIterator.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12114 from davies/local_iterator.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we extract Python UDFs into a special logical plan EvaluatePython in analyzer, But EvaluatePython is not part of catalyst, many rules have no knowledge of it , which will break many things (for example, filter push down or column pruning).
We should treat Python UDFs as normal expressions, until we want to evaluate in physical plan, we could extract them in end of optimizer, or physical plan.
This PR extract Python UDFs in physical plan.
Closes#10935
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12127 from davies/py_udf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a processing time trigger to control the batch processing speed
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#11976 from zsxwing/trigger.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR did a few cleanup on HashedRelation and HashJoin:
1) Merge HashedRelation and UniqueHashedRelation together
2) Return an iterator from HashedRelation, so we donot need a create many UnsafeRow objects.
3) Return a copy of HashedRelation for thread-safety in BroadcastJoin, so we can re-use the UnafeRow objects.
4) Cleanup HashJoin, share most of the code between BroadcastHashJoin and ShuffleHashJoin
5) Removed UniqueLongHashedRelation, which will be replaced by LongUnsafeMap (another PR).
6) Update benchmark, before this patch, the selectivity of joins are too high.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12102 from davies/cleanup_hash.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We recently added the ability to dump the generated code for a given query. However, the method is only available through an implicit after an import. It'd slightly simplify things if it can be called directly in queryExecution.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested in spark-shell.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#12144 from rxin/SPARK-14360.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update DebugQuery to work on Datasets of any type, not just DataFrames.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests, checked in spark-shell.
Author: Matei Zaharia <matei@databricks.com>
Closes#12140 from mateiz/debug-dataset.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR contains the following 5 types of maintenance fix over 59 files (+94 lines, -93 lines).
- Fix typos(exception/log strings, testcase name, comments) in 44 lines.
- Fix lint-java errors (MaxLineLength) in 6 lines. (New codes after SPARK-14011)
- Use diamond operators in 40 lines. (New codes after SPARK-13702)
- Fix redundant semicolon in 5 lines.
- Rename class `InferSchemaSuite` to `CSVInferSchemaSuite` in CSVInferSchemaSuite.scala.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual and pass the Jenkins tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#12139 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-14355.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
EXPLAIN output should be in a single cell.
**Before**
```
scala> sql("explain select 1").collect()
res0: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([== Physical Plan ==], [WholeStageCodegen], [: +- Project [1 AS 1#1]], [: +- INPUT], [+- Scan OneRowRelation[]])
```
**After**
```
scala> sql("explain select 1").collect()
res1: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] =
Array([== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [1 AS 1#4]
: +- INPUT
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]])
```
Or,
```
scala> sql("explain select 1").head
res1: org.apache.spark.sql.Row =
[== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [1 AS 1#5]
: +- INPUT
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]]
```
Please note that `Spark-shell(Scala-shell)` trims long string output. So, you may need to use `println` to get full strings.
```
scala> println(sql("explain codegen select 'a' as a group by 1").head)
[Found 2 WholeStageCodegen subtrees.
== Subtree 1 / 2 ==
WholeStageCodegen
...
/* 059 */ }
/* 060 */ }
]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests. (Testcases are updated.)
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#12137 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-14350.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14231
Currently, JSON data source supports to infer `DecimalType` for big numbers and `floatAsBigDecimal` option which reads floating-point values as `DecimalType`.
But there are few restrictions in Spark `DecimalType` below:
1. The precision cannot be bigger than 38.
2. scale cannot be bigger than precision.
Currently, both restrictions are not being handled.
This PR handles the cases by inferring them as `DoubleType`. Also, the option name was changed from `floatAsBigDecimal` to `prefersDecimal` as suggested [here](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14231?focusedCommentId=15215579&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15215579).
So, the codes below:
```scala
def doubleRecords: RDD[String] =
sqlContext.sparkContext.parallelize(
s"""{"a": 1${"0" * 38}, "b": 0.01}""" ::
s"""{"a": 2${"0" * 38}, "b": 0.02}""" :: Nil)
val jsonDF = sqlContext.read
.option("prefersDecimal", "true")
.json(doubleRecords)
jsonDF.printSchema()
```
produces below:
- **Before**
```scala
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Decimal scale (2) cannot be greater than precision (1).;
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.DecimalType.<init>(DecimalType.scala:44)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.InferSchema$.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$datasources$json$InferSchema$$inferField(InferSchema.scala:144)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.InferSchema$.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$datasources$json$InferSchema$$inferField(InferSchema.scala:108)
at
...
```
- **After**
```scala
root
|-- a: double (nullable = true)
|-- b: double (nullable = true)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests were used and `./dev/run_tests` for coding style tests.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#12030 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-14231.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix all Scala-Style multiline comments into Java-Style multiline comments in Scala codes.
(All comment-only changes over 77 files: +786 lines, −747 lines)
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#12130 from dongjoon-hyun/use_multiine_javadoc_comments.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Typo fixes. No functional changes.
## How was this patch tested?
Built the sources and ran with samples.
Author: Jacek Laskowski <jacek@japila.pl>
Closes#11802 from jaceklaskowski/typo-fixes.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
While trying to create a PR (which was not an issue at the end), I just corrected some style nits.
So, I removed the changes except for some coding style corrections.
- According to the [scala-style-guide#documentation-style](https://github.com/databricks/scala-style-guide#documentation-style), Scala style comments are discouraged.
>```scala
>/** This is a correct one-liner, short description. */
>
>/**
> * This is correct multi-line JavaDoc comment. And
> * this is my second line, and if I keep typing, this would be
> * my third line.
> */
>
>/** In Spark, we don't use the ScalaDoc style so this
> * is not correct.
> */
>```
- Double newlines between consecutive methods was removed. According to [scala-style-guide#blank-lines-vertical-whitespace](https://github.com/databricks/scala-style-guide#blank-lines-vertical-whitespace), single newline appears when
>Between consecutive members (or initializers) of a class: fields, constructors, methods, nested classes, static initializers, instance initializers.
- Remove uesless parentheses in tests
- Use `mapPartitions` instead of `mapPartitionsWithIndex()`.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests were used and `dev/run_tests` for style tests.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#12109 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-14271.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the Dataset API, it is fairly difficult for users to perform simple aggregations in a type-safe way at the moment because there are no aggregators that have been implemented. This pull request adds a few common aggregate functions in expressions.scala.typed package, and also creates the expressions.java.typed package without implementation. The java implementation should probably come as a separate pull request. One challenge there is to resolve the type difference between Scala primitive types and Java boxed types.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests for them.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#12077 from rxin/SPARK-14285.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements `EXPLAIN CODEGEN` SQL command which returns generated codes like `debugCodegen`. In `spark-shell`, we don't need to `import debug` module. In `spark-sql`, we can use this SQL command now.
**Before**
```
scala> import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.debug._
scala> sql("select 'a' as a group by 1").debugCodegen()
Found 2 WholeStageCodegen subtrees.
== Subtree 1 / 2 ==
...
Generated code:
...
== Subtree 2 / 2 ==
...
Generated code:
...
```
**After**
```
scala> sql("explain extended codegen select 'a' as a group by 1").collect().foreach(println)
[Found 2 WholeStageCodegen subtrees.]
[== Subtree 1 / 2 ==]
...
[]
[Generated code:]
...
[]
[== Subtree 2 / 2 ==]
...
[]
[Generated code:]
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests (including new testcases)
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#12099 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-14251.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR reduces Java byte code size of method in ```SpecificColumnarIterator``` by using a approach to make a group for lot of ```ColumnAccessor``` instantiations or method calls (more than 200) into a method
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new unit test, which includes large instantiations and method calls, to ```InMemoryColumnarQuerySuite```
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#12108 from kiszk/SPARK-14138-master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`SizeBasedWindowFunction.n` is a global singleton attribute created for evaluating size based aggregate window functions like `CUME_DIST`. However, this attribute gets different expression IDs when created on both driver side and executor side. This PR adds `withPartitionSize` method to `SizeBasedWindowFunction` so that we can easily rewrite `SizeBasedWindowFunction.n` on executor side.
## How was this patch tested?
A test case is added in `HiveSparkSubmitSuite`, which supports launching multi-process clusters.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#12040 from liancheng/spark-14244-fix-sized-window-function.
This PR adds the ability to perform aggregations inside of a `ContinuousQuery`. In order to implement this feature, the planning of aggregation has augmented with a new `StatefulAggregationStrategy`. Unlike batch aggregation, stateful-aggregation uses the `StateStore` (introduced in #11645) to persist the results of partial aggregation across different invocations. The resulting physical plan performs the aggregation using the following progression:
- Partial Aggregation
- Shuffle
- Partial Merge (now there is at most 1 tuple per group)
- StateStoreRestore (now there is 1 tuple from this batch + optionally one from the previous)
- Partial Merge (now there is at most 1 tuple per group)
- StateStoreSave (saves the tuple for the next batch)
- Complete (output the current result of the aggregation)
The following refactoring was also performed to allow us to plug into existing code:
- The get/put implementation is taken from #12013
- The logic for breaking down and de-duping the physical execution of aggregation has been move into a new pattern `PhysicalAggregation`
- The `AttributeReference` used to identify the result of an `AggregateFunction` as been moved into the `AggregateExpression` container. This change moves the reference into the same object as the other intermediate references used in aggregation and eliminates the need to pass around a `Map[(AggregateFunction, Boolean), Attribute]`. Further clean up (using a different aggregation container for logical/physical plans) is deferred to a followup.
- Some planning logic is moved from the `SessionState` into the `QueryExecution` to make it easier to override in the streaming case.
- The ability to write a `StreamTest` that checks only the output of the last batch has been added to simulate the future addition of output modes.
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#12048 from marmbrus/statefulAgg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
RpcEndpoint is not thread safe and allows multiple messages to be processed at the same time. StateStoreCoordinator should use ThreadSafeRpcEndpoint.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#12100 from zsxwing/fix-StateStoreCoordinator.
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13674
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Sample operator doesn't support wholestage codegen now. This pr is to add support to it.
## How was this patch tested?
A test is added into `BenchmarkWholeStageCodegen`. Besides, all tests should be passed.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#11517 from viirya/add-wholestage-sample.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the function `window` as a column expression.
`window` can be used to bucket rows into time windows given a time column. With this expression, performing time series analysis on batch data, as well as streaming data should become much more simpler.
### Usage
Assume the following schema:
`sensor_id, measurement, timestamp`
To average 5 minute data every 1 minute (window length of 5 minutes, slide duration of 1 minute), we will use:
```scala
df.groupBy(window("timestamp", “5 minutes”, “1 minute”), "sensor_id")
.agg(mean("measurement").as("avg_meas"))
```
This will generate windows such as:
```
09:00:00-09:05:00
09:01:00-09:06:00
09:02:00-09:07:00 ...
```
Intervals will start at every `slideDuration` starting at the unix epoch (1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC).
To start intervals at a different point of time, e.g. 30 seconds after a minute, the `startTime` parameter can be used.
```scala
df.groupBy(window("timestamp", “5 minutes”, “1 minute”, "30 second"), "sensor_id")
.agg(mean("measurement").as("avg_meas"))
```
This will generate windows such as:
```
09:00:30-09:05:30
09:01:30-09:06:30
09:02:30-09:07:30 ...
```
Support for Python will be made in a follow up PR after this.
## How was this patch tested?
This patch has some basic unit tests for the `TimeWindow` expression testing that the parameters pass validation, and it also has some unit/integration tests testing the correctness of the windowing and usability in complex operations (multi-column grouping, multi-column projections, joins).
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Closes#12008 from brkyvz/df-time-window.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR updates the usage comments of `debug` according to the following commits.
- [SPARK-9754](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9754) removed `typeCheck`.
- [SPARK-14227](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14227) added `debugCodegen`.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#12094 from dongjoon-hyun/minor_fix_debug_usage.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses the following
1. Supports native execution of SHOW DATABASES command
2. Fixes SHOW TABLES to apply the identifier_with_wildcards pattern if supplied.
SHOW TABLE syntax
```
SHOW TABLES [IN database_name] ['identifier_with_wildcards'];
```
SHOW DATABASES syntax
```
SHOW (DATABASES|SCHEMAS) [LIKE 'identifier_with_wildcards'];
```
## How was this patch tested?
Tests added in SQLQuerySuite (both hive and sql contexts) and DDLCommandSuite
Note: Since the table name pattern was not working , tests are added in both SQLQuerySuite to
verify the application of the table pattern.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#11991 from dilipbiswal/dkb_show_database.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements `FileFormat.buildReader()` for the LibSVM data source. Besides that, a new interface method `prepareRead()` is added to `FileFormat`:
```scala
def prepareRead(
sqlContext: SQLContext,
options: Map[String, String],
files: Seq[FileStatus]): Map[String, String] = options
```
After migrating from `buildInternalScan()` to `buildReader()`, we lost the opportunity to collect necessary global information, since `buildReader()` works in a per-partition manner. For example, LibSVM needs to infer the total number of features if the `numFeatures` data source option is not set. Any necessary collected global information should be returned using the data source options map. By default, this method just returns the original options untouched.
An alternative approach is to absorb `inferSchema()` into `prepareRead()`, since schema inference is also some kind of global information gathering. However, this approach wasn't chosen because schema inference is optional, while `prepareRead()` must be called whenever a `HadoopFsRelation` based data source relation is instantiated.
One unaddressed problem is that, when `numFeatures` is absent, now the input data will be scanned twice. The `buildInternalScan()` code path doesn't need to do this because it caches the raw parsed RDD in memory before computing the total number of features. However, with `FileScanRDD`, the raw parsed RDD is created in a different way (e.g. partitioning) from the final RDD.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested using existing test suites.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#12088 from liancheng/spark-14295-libsvm-build-reader.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR support multiple Python UDFs within single batch, also improve the performance.
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import IntegerType
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("double", lambda x: x * 2, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("add", lambda x, y: x + y, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.sql("SELECT double(add(1, 2)), add(double(2), 1)").explain(True)
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [unresolvedalias('double('add(1, 2)), None),unresolvedalias('add('double(2), 1), None)]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
double(add(1, 2)): int, add(double(2), 1): int
Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17,pythonUDF0#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Using the following script to benchmark 1, 2 and 3 udfs,
```
df = sqlContext.range(1, 1 << 23, 1, 4)
double = F.udf(lambda x: x * 2, LongType())
print df.select(double(df.id)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1), double(df.id + 2)).count()
```
Here is the results:
N | Before | After | speed up
---- |------------ | -------------|------
1 | 22 s | 7 s | 3.1X
2 | 38 s | 13 s | 2.9X
3 | 58 s | 16 s | 3.6X
This benchmark ran locally with 4 CPUs. For 3 UDFs, it launched 12 Python before before this patch, 4 process after this patch. After this patch, it will use less memory for multiple UDFs than before (less buffering).
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12057 from davies/multi_udfs.
This PR is to provide native parsing support for DDL commands: `Alter View`. Since its AST trees are highly similar to `Alter Table`. Thus, both implementation are integrated into the same one.
Based on the Hive DDL document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+DDL and https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/PartitionedViews
**Syntax:**
```SQL
ALTER VIEW view_name RENAME TO new_view_name
```
- to change the name of a view to a different name
**Syntax:**
```SQL
ALTER VIEW view_name SET TBLPROPERTIES ('comment' = new_comment);
```
- to add metadata to a view
**Syntax:**
```SQL
ALTER VIEW view_name UNSET TBLPROPERTIES [IF EXISTS] ('comment', 'key')
```
- to remove metadata from a view
**Syntax:**
```SQL
ALTER VIEW view_name ADD [IF NOT EXISTS] PARTITION spec1[, PARTITION spec2, ...]
```
- to add the partitioning metadata for a view.
- the syntax of partition spec in `ALTER VIEW` is identical to `ALTER TABLE`, **EXCEPT** that it is **ILLEGAL** to specify a `LOCATION` clause.
**Syntax:**
```SQL
ALTER VIEW view_name DROP [IF EXISTS] PARTITION spec1[, PARTITION spec2, ...]
```
- to drop the related partition metadata for a view.
Added the related test cases to `DDLCommandSuite`
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#11987 from gatorsmile/parseAlterView.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes a minor bug in the record reader constructor that was possibly introduced during refactoring.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#12070 from sameeragarwal/vectorized-rr.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes a new data-structure based on a vectorized hashmap that can be potentially _codegened_ in `TungstenAggregate` to speed up aggregates with group by. Micro-benchmarks show a 10x improvement over the current `BytesToBytes` aggregation map.
## How was this patch tested?
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960HQ CPU 2.60GHz
BytesToBytesMap: Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hash 108 / 119 96.9 10.3 1.0X
fast hash 63 / 70 166.2 6.0 1.7X
arrayEqual 70 / 73 150.8 6.6 1.6X
Java HashMap (Long) 141 / 200 74.3 13.5 0.8X
Java HashMap (two ints) 145 / 185 72.3 13.8 0.7X
Java HashMap (UnsafeRow) 499 / 524 21.0 47.6 0.2X
BytesToBytesMap (off Heap) 483 / 548 21.7 46.0 0.2X
BytesToBytesMap (on Heap) 485 / 562 21.6 46.2 0.2X
Vectorized Hashmap 54 / 60 193.7 5.2 2.0X
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#12055 from sameeragarwal/vectorized-hashmap.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes the ANTLR3 based parser, and moves the new ANTLR4 based parser into the `org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser package`.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
cc rxin andrewor14 yhuai
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@questtec.nl>
Closes#12071 from hvanhovell/SPARK-14211.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Major changes:
1. Implement `FileFormat.buildReader()` for the CSV data source.
1. Add an extra argument to `FileFormat.buildReader()`, `physicalSchema`, which is basically the result of `FileFormat.inferSchema` or user specified schema.
This argument is necessary because the CSV data source needs to know all the columns of the underlying files to read the file.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should do the work.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#12002 from liancheng/spark-14206-csv-build-reader.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change resolves an issue where `DataFrameNaFunctions.fill` changes a `FloatType` column to a `DoubleType`. We also clarify the contract that replacement values will be cast to the column data type, which may change the replacement value when casting to a lower precision type.
## How was this patch tested?
This patch has associated unit tests.
Author: Travis Crawford <travis@medium.com>
Closes#11967 from traviscrawford/SPARK-14081-dataframena.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to add a config to control the maximum number of files as even small files have a non-trivial fixed cost. The current packing can put a lot of small files together which cases straggler tasks.
## How was this patch tested?
I added tests to check if many files get split into partitions in FileSourceStrategySuite.
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
Closes#12068 from maropu/SPARK-14259.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements buildReader for text data source and enable it in the new data source code path.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11934 from cloud-fan/text.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to implement the following four Database-related DDL commands:
- `CREATE DATABASE|SCHEMA [IF NOT EXISTS] database_name`
- `DROP DATABASE [IF EXISTS] database_name [RESTRICT|CASCADE]`
- `DESCRIBE DATABASE [EXTENDED] db_name`
- `ALTER (DATABASE|SCHEMA) database_name SET DBPROPERTIES (property_name=property_value, ...)`
Another PR will be submitted to handle the unsupported commands. In the Database-related DDL commands, we will issue an error exception for `ALTER (DATABASE|SCHEMA) database_name SET OWNER [USER|ROLE] user_or_role`.
cc yhuai andrewor14 rxin Could you review the changes? Is it in the right direction? Thanks!
#### How was this patch tested?
Added a few test cases in `command/DDLSuite.scala` for testing DDL command execution in `SQLContext`. Since `HiveContext` also shares the same implementation, the existing test cases in `\hive` also verifies the correctness of these commands.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: xiaoli <lixiao1983@gmail.com>
Author: Xiao Li <xiaoli@Xiaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#12009 from gatorsmile/dbDDL.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR brings the support for chained Python UDFs, for example
```sql
select udf1(udf2(a))
select udf1(udf2(a) + 3)
select udf1(udf2(a) + udf3(b))
```
Also directly chained unary Python UDFs are put in single batch of Python UDFs, others may require multiple batches.
For example,
```python
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF#10 AS double(double(1))#9]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(double(1)), [pythonUDF#10]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1) + double(2))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF#19 AS double((double(1) + double(2)))#16]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double((pythonUDF#17 + pythonUDF#18)), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18,pythonUDF#19]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(2), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(1), [pythonUDF#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
TODO: will support multiple unrelated Python UDFs in one batch (another PR).
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests for chained UDFs.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#12014 from davies/py_udfs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a simple fix for an exception message to print `string[]` content correctly.
```java
String[] colPath = requestedSchema.getPaths().get(i);
...
- throw new IOException("Required column is missing in data file. Col: " + colPath);
+ throw new IOException("Required column is missing in data file. Col: " + Arrays.toString(colPath));
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#12041 from dongjoon-hyun/fix_exception_message_with_string_array.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Renames SQL option `spark.sql.parquet.fileScan` since now all `HadoopFsRelation` based data sources are being migrated to `FileScanRDD` code path.
## How was this patch tested?
None.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#12003 from liancheng/spark-14208-option-renaming.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements buildReader for json data source and enable it in the new data source code path.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#11960 from cloud-fan/json.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds a metric to parquet scans that measures the time in just the scan phase. This is
only possible when the scan returns ColumnarBatches, otherwise the overhead is too high.
This combined with the pipeline metric lets us easily see what percent of the time was
in the scan.
Author: Nong Li <nong@databricks.com>
Closes#12007 from nongli/spark-14210.
