## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change adds support for returning StructType from a scalar Pandas UDF, where the return value of the function is a pandas.DataFrame. Nested structs are not supported and an error will be raised, child types can be any other type currently supported.
## How was this patch tested?
Added additional unit tests to `test_pandas_udf_scalar`
Closes#23900 from BryanCutler/pyspark-support-scalar_udf-StructType-SPARK-23836.
Authored-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`CodeGenerator.updateAndGetCompilationStats` throws an unsupported exception for empty code size statistics. This pr added code to check if it is empty or not.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins.
Closes#23947 from maropu/SPARK-21871-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a very minor pr to include the usage example to generate output for single test in SQLQueryTestSuite. I tried to deduce it from the existing example and ran into a scenario
where sbt is simply looping to run the same test over and over again. Here is the example
of running a single test.
```
build/sbt "~sql/test-only *SQLQueryTestSuite -- -z inline-table.sql"
```
I tried to generate the output for a single test by prepending `SPARK_GENERATE_GOLDEN_FILES=1` like following
```
SPARK_GENERATE_GOLDEN_FILES=1 build/sbt "~sql/test-only *SQLQueryTestSuite -- -z describe.sql"
```
In this case i found that sbt is looping trying to run describe.sql over and over again as we are running the test in on continuous mode (because of `~` prefix ) where it detects a change in
the generated result file which in turn triggers a build and test. I have included an example where
we don't run it in continuous mode when generating the output. Hopefully it saves other developers some time.
## How was this patch tested?
Verified manually in my dev setup.
Closes#23995 from dilipbiswal/dkb_sqlquerytest_usage.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
While I am migrating other data sources, I find that we should abstract the logic that:
1. converting safe `InternalRow`s into `UnsafeRow`s
2. appending partition values to the end of the result row if existed
This PR proposes to support handling partition values in file source v2 abstraction by adding a util class `PartitionReaderWithPartitionValues`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests
Closes#23987 from gengliangwang/SPARK-27049.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
PySpark's Binarizer docstring had two issues:
1) The values did not need to be in the range [0, 1].
2) It can be used for binary classification prediction.
This change corrects both of these issues by making it consistent with Scala's docstring for Binarizer.
## How was this patch tested?
Not applicable because I only changed the docstring. But if I need to do any testing, let me know and I'll do it.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#23934 from brookewenig/binarizer-docs-fix.
Authored-by: Brooke Wenig <brookewenig@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fix `NoSuchFieldError` when reading Hive materialized views from Hive 2.3.4.
How to reproduce:
Hive side:
```sql
CREATE TABLE materialized_view_tbl (key INT);
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW view_1 DISABLE REWRITE AS SELECT * FROM materialized_view_tbl;
```
Spark side:
```java
bin/spark-sql --conf spark.sql.hive.metastore.version=2.3.4 --conf spark.sql.hive.metastore.jars=maven
spark-sql> select * from view_1;
19/03/05 19:55:37 ERROR SparkSQLDriver: Failed in [select * from view_1]
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: INDEX_TABLE
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.$anonfun$getTableOption$3(HiveClientImpl.scala:438)
at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:163)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.$anonfun$getTableOption$1(HiveClientImpl.scala:370)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.$anonfun$withHiveState$1(HiveClientImpl.scala:277)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.liftedTree1$1(HiveClientImpl.scala:215)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.retryLocked(HiveClientImpl.scala:214)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.withHiveState(HiveClientImpl.scala:260)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.HiveClientImpl.getTableOption(HiveClientImpl.scala:368)
```
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Closes#23984 from wangyum/SPARK-24360.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I would like to refactor `limit.scala` slightly and introduce common trait `LimitExec` for `CollectLimitExec` and `BaseLimitExec` (`LocalLimitExec` and `GlobalLimitExec`). This will allow to distinguish those operators from others, and to get the `limit` value without casting to concrete class.
## How was this patch tested?
by existing test suites.
Closes#23976 from MaxGekk/limit-exec.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when the event reordering happens, especially onJobStart event come after onExecutionEnd event, SQL page in the UI displays weirdly.(for eg:test mentioned in JIRA and also this issue randomly occurs when the TPCDS query fails due to broadcast timeout etc.)
The reason is that, In the SQLAppstatusListener, we remove the liveExecutions entry once the execution ends. So, if a jobStart event come after that, then we create a new liveExecution entry corresponding to the execId. Eventually this will overwrite the kvstore and UI displays confusing entries.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT, Also manually tested with the eventLog, provided in the jira, of the failed query.
Before fix:
After fix:
Closes#23939 from shahidki31/SPARK-27019.
Authored-by: Shahid <shahidki31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrade Docker image for release build to Ubuntu 18.04LTS
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Closes#23932 from dbtsai/ubuntu18.04.
Authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make k8s client timeouts configurable. No test suite exists for the client factory class, happy to add one if needed
Closes#23928 from onursatici/os/k8s-client-timeouts.
Lead-authored-by: Onur Satici <osatici@palantir.com>
Co-authored-by: Onur Satici <onursatici@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is another attempt to fix the more-than-one-active-task-set-managers bug.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17208 is the first attempt. It marks the TSM as zombie before sending a task completion event to DAGScheduler. This is necessary, because when the DAGScheduler gets the task completion event, and it's for the last partition, then the stage is finished. However, if it's a shuffle stage and it has missing map outputs, DAGScheduler will resubmit it(see the [code](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v2.4.0/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala#L1416-L1422)) and create a new TSM for this stage. This leads to more than one active TSM of a stage and fail.
This fix has a hole: Let's say a stage has 10 partitions and 2 task set managers: TSM1(zombie) and TSM2(active). TSM1 has a running task for partition 10 and it completes. TSM2 finishes tasks for partitions 1-9, and thinks he is still active because he hasn't finished partition 10 yet. However, DAGScheduler gets task completion events for all the 10 partitions and thinks the stage is finished. Then the same problem occurs: DAGScheduler may resubmit the stage and cause more than one actice TSM error.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21131 fixed this hole by notifying all the task set managers when a task finishes. For the above case, TSM2 will know that partition 10 is already completed, so he can mark himself as zombie after partitions 1-9 are completed.
However, #21131 still has a hole: TSM2 may be created after the task from TSM1 is completed. Then TSM2 can't get notified about the task completion, and leads to the more than one active TSM error.
#22806 and #23871 are created to fix this hole. However the fix is complicated and there are still ongoing discussions.
This PR proposes a simple fix, which can be easy to backport: mark all existing task set managers as zombie when trying to create a new task set manager.
After this PR, #21131 is still necessary, to avoid launching unnecessary tasks and fix [SPARK-25250](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25250 ). #22806 and #23871 are its followups to fix the hole.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Closes#23927 from cloud-fan/scheduler.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is an optional solution for #22806 .
#21131 firstly implement that a previous successful completed task from zombie TaskSetManager could also succeed the active TaskSetManager, which based on an assumption that an active TaskSetManager always exists for that stage when this happen. But that's not always true as an active TaskSetManager may haven't been created when a previous task succeed, and this is the reason why #22806 hit the issue.
This pr extends #21131 's behavior by adding `stageIdToFinishedPartitions` into TaskSchedulerImpl, which recording the finished partition whenever a task(from zombie or active) succeed. Thus, a later created active TaskSetManager could also learn about the finished partition by looking into `stageIdToFinishedPartitions ` and won't launch any duplicate tasks.
## How was this patch tested?
Add.
Closes#23871 from Ngone51/dev-23433-25250.
Lead-authored-by: wuyi <ngone_5451@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Ngone51 <ngone_5451@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before dropping database refresh the tables of that database, so as to refresh all cached entries associated with those tables.
We follow the same when dropping a table.
## How was this patch tested?
UT is added
Closes#23905 from Udbhav30/SPARK-24669.
Authored-by: Udbhav30 <u.agrawal30@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
spark-standalone documentation do not mention about stop-slave.sh script
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested the changes
Closes#23960 from ajithme/slavedoc.
Authored-by: Ajith <ajith2489@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to replace `System.currentTimeMillis()` by `Instant.now()` in the `CurrentTimestamp` expression. `Instant.now()` uses the best available clock in the system to take current time. See [JDK-8068730](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068730) for more details. In JDK8, `Instant.now()` provides results with millisecond resolution but starting from JDK9 resolution of results is increased up to microseconds.
## How was this patch tested?
The changes were tested by `DateTimeUtilsSuite` and by `DateFunctionsSuite`.
Closes#23945 from MaxGekk/current-time.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add 'Recall_at_k' metric to RankingMetrics
## How was this patch tested?
Add test to RankingMetricsSuite.
Closes#23881 from masa3141/SPARK-26981.
Authored-by: masa3141 <masahiro@kazama.tv>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removed unnecessary conversion of microseconds in `DateTimeUtils.timestampToString` to `java.sql.Timestamp` which aims to output fraction of seconds by casting it to string. This was replaced by special `TimestampFormatter` which appends the fraction formatter to `DateTimeFormatterBuilder`: `appendFraction(ChronoField.NANO_OF_SECOND, 0, 9, true)`. The former one means trailing zeros in second's fraction should be truncated while formatting.
## How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites like `CastSuite`, `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `JDBCSuite`, and by new test in `TimestampFormatterSuite`.
Closes#23936 from MaxGekk/timestamp-to-string.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spelling mistake: forword -> forward
## How was this patch tested?
This is a private function, there is no place to call this function outside of this file.
Closes#23978 from moqimoqidea/master.
Authored-by: moqimoqidea <39821951+moqimoqidea@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR sets socket timeout consistently across Arrow optimization by `SPARKR_BACKEND_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT`. There looks only one place left.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover.
Closes#23971 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-26922.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Escape arguments for submissions sent to a Mesos dispatcher; analogous change to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24380 for confs.
Since this changes behavior than some users are undoubtedly already working around, probably best to only only merge into master.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new unit test, covering some existing behavior as well.
Closes#23967 from mwlon/SPARK-27015.
Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Creating an Netty `EventLoopGroup` leads to creating a new Thread pool for handling the events. For stopping the threads of the pool the event loop group should be shut down which is properly done for transport servers and clients by calling for example the `shutdownGracefully()` method (for details see the `close()` method of `TransportClientFactory` and `TransportServer`). But there is a separate event loop group for shuffle chunk fetch requests which is in pipeline for handling fetch request (shared between the client and server) and owned by the `TransportContext` and this was never shut down.
## How was this patch tested?
With existing unittest.
This leak is in the production system too but its effect is spiking in the unittest.
Checking the core unittest logs before the PR:
```
$ grep "LEAK IN SUITE" unit-tests.log | grep -o shuffle-chunk-fetch-handler | wc -l
381
```
And after the PR without whitelisting in thread audit and with an extra `await` after the
` chunkFetchWorkers.shutdownGracefully()`:
```
$ grep "LEAK IN SUITE" unit-tests.log | grep -o shuffle-chunk-fetch-handler | wc -l
0
```
Closes#23930 from attilapiros/SPARK-27021.
Authored-by: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Hive 2.1.1 cannot read ORC table created by Spark 2.4.0 in default, and I add the information into sql-migration-guide-upgrade.md. for details to see: [SPARK-26932](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26932)
doc build
Closes#23944 from haiboself/SPARK-26932.
Authored-by: Bo Hai <haibo-self@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We have benchmark of nested schema pruning, but only for Parquet. This adds similar benchmark for ORC. This is used with nested schema pruning of ORC.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Closes#23955 from viirya/orc-nested-schema-pruning-benchmark.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This proposes to add instrumentation for the driver's JVM CPU time via the Spark Dropwizard/Codahale metrics system. It follows directly from previous work SPARK-25228 and shares similar motivations: it is intended as an improvement to be used for Spark performance dashboards and monitoring tools/instrumentation.
Implementation details: this PR takes the code introduced in SPARK-25228 and moves it to a new separate Source JVMCPUSource, which is then used to register the jvmCpuTime gauge metric for both executor and driver.
The registration of the jvmCpuTime metric for the driver is conditional, a new configuration parameter `spark.metrics.cpu.time.driver.enabled` (proposed default: false) is introduced for this purpose.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, using local mode and using YARN.
Closes#23838 from LucaCanali/addCPUTimeMetricDriver.
Authored-by: Luca Canali <luca.canali@cern.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After we cache a table, we can see its details in Storage Tab of spark UI. If the executor has shutdown ( graceful shutdown/ Dynamic executor scenario) UI still shows the rdd as cached and when we click the link it throws error. This is because on executor remove event, we fail to adjust rdd partition details org.apache.spark.status.AppStatusListener#onExecutorRemoved
## How was this patch tested?
Have tested this fix in UI manually
Edit: Added UT
Closes#23920 from ajithme/cachestorage.
Authored-by: Ajith <ajith2489@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since this caveat added to the DStreams documentation it would be good to add to Structured Streaming as well.
## How was this patch tested?
cd docs/
SKIP_API=1 jekyll build
Manual webpage check.
Closes#23974 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-26592_.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr tried to drop `Serializable` in `WalkedTypePath`.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins.
Closes#23973 from maropu/SPARK-27001-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark apps do not need to package Spark. In fact it can cause problems in some cases. Our examples should show depending on Spark as a 'provided' dependency.
Packaging Spark makes the app much bigger by tens of megabytes. It can also bring in conflicting dependencies that wouldn't otherwise be a problem. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26146 was what reminded me of this.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc build
Closes#23938 from srowen/Provided.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12881 removed `HiveSessionHook`. But there are still some code related to `HiveSessionHook`.
This PR removes all `HiveSessionHook` related code.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#23957 from wangyum/SPARK-15095.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fasterxml Jackson version before 2.9.8 is affected by multiple [CVEs](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/2186), we need to fix bump the dependent Jackson to 2.9.8.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and offline benchmark.
I have run ```SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.json.JSONBenchmark"``` to check there is no performance degradation for this upgrade.
Closes#23965 from yanboliang/SPARK-27051.
Authored-by: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR optimizes `InSet` expressions for byte, short, integer, date types. It is a follow-up on PR #21442 from dbtsai.
`In` expressions are compiled into a sequence of if-else statements, which results in O\(n\) time complexity. `InSet` is an optimized version of `In`, which is supposed to improve the performance if all values are literals and the number of elements is big enough. However, `InSet` actually worsens the performance in many cases due to various reasons.
The main idea of this PR is to use Java `switch` statements to significantly improve the performance of `InSet` expressions for bytes, shorts, ints, dates. All `switch` statements are compiled into `tableswitch` and `lookupswitch` bytecode instructions. We will have O\(1\) time complexity if our case values are compact and `tableswitch` can be used. Otherwise, `lookupswitch` will give us O\(log n\).
Locally, I tried Spark `OpenHashSet` and primitive collections from `fastutils` in order to solve the boxing issue in `InSet`. Both options significantly decreased the memory consumption and `fastutils` improved the time compared to `HashSet` from Scala. However, the switch-based approach was still more than two times faster even on 500+ non-compact elements.
I also noticed that applying the switch-based approach on less than 10 elements gives a relatively minor improvement compared to the if-else approach. Therefore, I placed the switch-based logic into `InSet` and added a new config to track when it is applied. Even if we migrate to primitive collections at some point, the switch logic will be still faster unless the number of elements is really big. Another option is to have a separate `InSwitch` expression. However, this would mean we need to modify other places (e.g., `DataSourceStrategy`).
See [here](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-3.html#jvms-3.10) and [here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10287700/difference-between-jvms-lookupswitch-and-tableswitch) for more information.
This PR does not cover long values as Java `switch` statements cannot be used on them. However, we can have a follow-up PR with an approach similar to binary search.
## How was this patch tested?
There are new tests that verify the logic of the proposed optimization.
The performance was evaluated using existing benchmarks. This PR was also tested on an EC2 instance (OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_191-b12 on Linux 4.14.77-70.59.amzn1.x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2686 v4 2.30GHz).
## Notes
- [This link](http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/langtools/file/30db5e0aaf83/src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/jvm/Gen.java#l1153) contains source code that decides between `tableswitch` and `lookupswitch`. The logic was re-used in the benchmarks. See the `isLookupSwitch` method.
Closes#23171 from aokolnychyi/spark-26205.
Lead-authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clarify that text DataSource read/write, and RDD methods that read text, always use UTF-8 as they use Hadoop's implementation underneath. I think these are all the places that this needs a mention in the user-facing docs.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc tests.
Closes#23962 from srowen/SPARK-26016.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr makes it get proxy user's delegation token, otherwise throws `AccessControlException`([full log](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25689?focusedCommentId=16780609&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16780609)):
```java
org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Client cannot authenticate via:[TOKEN, KERBEROS]
...
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.YarnClientSchedulerBackend.waitForApplication(YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.YarnClientSchedulerBackend.start(YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala:62)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.TaskSchedulerImpl.start(TaskSchedulerImpl.scala:185)
```
How to reproduce this issue:
```shell
$ ssh user_admspark-getaway-host1
$ export HADOOP_PROXY_USER=user_a
$ spark-sql --master yarn
```
## How was this patch tested?
Test on our production environment.
Closes#23922 from wangyum/SPARK-25689.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Only memory usage without GC information could not help us to determinate the proper settings of memory. We need the GC metrics about frequency of major & minor GC. For example, two cases, their configured memory for executor are all 10GB and their usages are all near 10GB. So should we increase or decrease the configured memory for them? This metrics may be helpful. We can increase configured memory for the first one if it has very frequency major GC and decrease the second one if only some minor GC and none major GC.
GC metrics are only useful in entire lifetime of executors instead of separated stages.
## How was this patch tested?
Adding UT.
Closes#22874 from LantaoJin/SPARK-25865.
Authored-by: LantaoJin <jinlantao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Introducing new config for initially blacklisted YARN nodes.
## How was this patch tested?
With existing and a new unit test.
Closes#23616 from attilapiros/SPARK-26688.
Lead-authored-by: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Attila Zsolt Piros <2017933+attilapiros@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Retrieve enableFetcherCache option from submission conf rather than dispatcher conf. This resolves some confusing behavior where Spark drivers currently get this conf from the dispatcher, whereas Spark executors get this conf from the submission. After this change, the conf will only need to be specified once.
## How was this patch tested?
With (updated) existing tests.
Closes#23924 from mwlon/SPARK-26192.
Authored-by: mwlon <mloncaric@hmc.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[SPARK-23155](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23155) enables SHS to set up custom executor log URLs. This patch proposes to extend this feature to to Spark UI as well.
Unlike the approach we did for SHS (replace executor log URLs when executor information is requested so it's like a change of view), here this patch replaces executor log URLs while registering executor, which also affects event log as well. In point of SHS's view, it will be treated as original log url when custom log url is applied to Spark UI.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Closes#23790 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-26792.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Running Spark in Docker image with Alpine Linux 3.9.0 throws errors when using snappy.
The issue can be reproduced for example as follows: `Seq(1,2).toDF("id").write.format("parquet").save("DELETEME1")`
The key part of the error stack is as follows `SparkException: Task failed while writing rows. .... Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /tmp/snappy-1.1.7-2b4872f1-7c41-4b84-bda1-dbcb8dd0ce4c-libsnappyjava.so: Error loading shared library ld-linux-x86-64.so.2: Noded by /tmp/snappy-1.1.7-2b4872f1-7c41-4b84-bda1-dbcb8dd0ce4c-libsnappyjava.so)`
The source of the error appears to be that libsnappyjava.so needs ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 and looks for it in /lib, while in Alpine Linux 3.9.0 with libc6-compat version 1.1.20-r3 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 is located in /lib64.
Note: this issue is not present with Alpine Linux 3.8 and libc6-compat version 1.1.19-r10
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A possible workaround proposed with this PR is to modify the Dockerfile by adding a symbolic link between /lib and /lib64 so that linux-x86-64.so.2 can be found in /lib. This is probably not the cleanest solution, but I have observed that this is what happened/happens already when using Alpine Linux 3.8.1 (a version of Alpine Linux which was not affected by the issue reported here).
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested by running a simple workload with spark-shell, using docker on a client machine and using Spark on a Kubernetes cluster. The test workload is: `Seq(1,2).toDF("id").write.format("parquet").save("DELETEME1")`
Added a test to the KubernetesSuite / BasicTestsSuite
Closes#23898 from LucaCanali/dockerfileUpdateSPARK26995.
Authored-by: Luca Canali <luca.canali@cern.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-19185 is resolved so the reference can be removed from the documentation.
## How was this patch tested?
cd docs/
SKIP_API=1 jekyll build
Manual webpage check.
Closes#23959 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-27046.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When reading files with empty partition columns, we can avoid using JoinRow.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#23953 from gengliangwang/avoidJoinRow.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In master, `ElementAt` nullable is always true;
be1cadf16d/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala (L1977)
But, If input is an array and foldable, we could make its nullability more precise.
This fix is based on SPARK-26637(#23566).
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CollectionExpressionsSuite`.
Closes#23867 from maropu/SPARK-26965.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds support for pushing down LeftSemi and LeftAnti joins below operators such as Project, Aggregate, Window, Union etc. This is the initial piece of work that will be needed for
the subsequent work of moving the subquery rewrites to the beginning of optimization phase.
The larger PR is [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23211) . This PR addresses the comment at [link](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23211#issuecomment-445705922).
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test suite LeftSemiAntiJoinPushDownSuite.
Closes#23750 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-19712-pushleftsemi.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Similar to `SaveMode`, we should remove streaming `OutputMode` from data source v2 API, and use operations that has clear semantic.
The changes are:
1. append mode: create `StreamingWrite` directly. By default, the `WriteBuilder` will create `Write` to append data.
2. complete mode: call `SupportsTruncate#truncate`. Complete mode means truncating all the old data and appending new data of the current epoch. `SupportsTruncate` has exactly the same semantic.
3. update mode: fail. The current streaming framework can't propagate the update keys, so v2 sinks are not able to implement update mode. In the future we can introduce a `SupportsUpdate` trait.
The behavior changes:
1. all the v2 sinks(foreach, console, memory, kafka, noop) don't support update mode. The fact is, previously all the v2 sinks implement the update mode wrong. None of them can really support it.
2. kafka sink doesn't support complete mode. The fact is, the kafka sink can only append data.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23859 from cloud-fan/update.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR introduces leveraging of subquery filters for partition pruning in file source.
Subquery expressions are not allowed to be used for partition pruning in `FileSourceStrategy` now, instead a `FilterExec` is added around the `FileSourceScanExec` to do the job.
This PR optimizes the process by allowing partition pruning subquery expressions as partition filters.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new UT and run existing UTs especially SPARK-25482 and SPARK-24085 related ones.
Closes#23802 from peter-toth/SPARK-26893.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reduce work in HDFSMetadataLogSuite test to possibly de-flake it.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#23937 from srowen/SPARK-27032.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes refactoring `serializerFor` method between `ScalaReflection` and `JavaTypeInference`, being consistent with what we refactored for `deserializerFor` in #23854.
This patch also extracts the logic on recording walk type path since the logic is duplicated across `serializerFor` and `deserializerFor` with `ScalaReflection` and `JavaTypeInference`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#23908 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-27001.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use the maven plugin option `treatWarningsAsErrors` to make sure the warnings are treated as errors while generating the parser file. In the absence of it, we may inadvertently introducing problems while making grammar changes. Please refer to [PR-23897](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23897) to know more about the context.
## How was this patch tested?
We can use two ways to build Spark 1) sbt 2) Maven
This PR, we made a change to configure the maven antlr plugin to include a parameter that makes antlr4 report error on warning. However, when spark is built using sbt, we use the sbt antlr plugin which does not allow us to pass this additional compilation flag. More info on sbt-antlr plugin can be found at [link](https://github.com/ihji/sbt-antlr4/blob/master/src/main/scala/com/simplytyped/Antlr4Plugin.scala)
In summary, this fix only applicable when we use maven to build.
Closes#23925 from dilipbiswal/antlr_fix.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update Thrift to 0.12.0 to pick up bug and security fixes.
Changes: https://github.com/apache/thrift/blob/master/CHANGES.md
The important one is for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4506
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests. A quick local test suggests this works.
Closes#23935 from srowen/SPARK-27029.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
