### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr simplify `CaseWhen`clauses with (true and false) and (false and true):
Expression | cond.nullable | After simplify
-- | -- | --
case when cond then true else false end | true | cond <=> true
case when cond then true else false end | false | cond
case when cond then false else true end | true | !(cond <=> true)
case when cond then false else true end | false | !cond
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve query performance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30898 from wangyum/SPARK-33884.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For `InMemoryPartitionTable` used in tests, set empty partition metadata only when a partition doesn't exists.
### Why are the changes needed?
This bug fix is needed to use `INSERT INTO .. PARTITION` in other tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. It affects only the v2 table catalog used in tests.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new UT to `DataSourceV2SQLSuite`, and run the affected test suite by:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.connector.DataSourceV2SQLSuite"
```
Closes#30952 from MaxGekk/fix-insert-into-partition-v2.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is kind of a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24033.
The first and last usage of that argument `SecurityManager` was removed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24033.
After that, we don't need to pass `SecurityManager` anymore in `Utils.fetchFile` and related code paths.
This PR proposes to remove it out.
### Why are the changes needed?
For better readability of codes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually complied. GitHub Actions and Jenkins build should test it out as well.
Closes#30945 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33925.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30849, to fix a correctness issue caused by null value handling.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix a correctness issue. `If(null, true, false)` should return false, not true.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, but the bug only exist in the master branch.
### How was this patch tested?
updated tests.
Closes#30953 from cloud-fan/bug.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix offset bug and improve compression codec test coverage.
### Why are the changes needed?
When the user choose a non-default codec, it causes a failure.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the extended test suite.
Closes#30934 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-33916.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove `assert(ns.nonEmpty)` in `ResolveSessionCatalog` for:
- `SHOW TABLES`
- `SHOW TABLE EXTENDED`
- `SHOW VIEWS`
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark SQL shouldn't fail with internal assert failures even for invalid user inputs. For instance:
```sql
spark-sql> show tables in spark_catalog;
20/12/24 11:19:46 ERROR SparkSQLDriver: Failed in [show tables in spark_catalog]
java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed
at scala.Predef$.assert(Predef.scala:208)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveSessionCatalog$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(ResolveSessionCatalog.scala:366)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.ResolveSessionCatalog$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(ResolveSessionCatalog.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.AnalysisHelper.$anonfun$resolveOperatorsUp$3(AnalysisHelper.scala:90)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:73)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes, for the example above:
```sql
spark-sql> show tables in spark_catalog;
Error in query: multi-part identifier cannot be empty.
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new UT to `v1/ShowTablesSuite`.
Closes#30915 from MaxGekk/remove-assert-ns-nonempty.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Remove the explicit AQE disable confs
* Use `AdaptiveSparkPlanHelper` to check plans
* No longer extending `DisableAdaptiveExecutionSuite` for `BucketedReadSuite` but only disable AQE for two certain tests there.
### Why are the changes needed?
Some tests that are fixed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30655 doesn't really require AQE off. Instead, they could use `AdaptiveSparkPlanHelper` to pass when AQE on. It's better to run tests with AQE on since we've turned it on by default.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass all tests and the updated tests.
Closes#30941 from Ngone51/SPARK-33680-follow-up.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to unload inactive state store as soon as possible. The timing of unload inactive state stores, happens when we get to load active state store provider at executors. At the time, state store coordinator will return back the state store provider list including loaded stores that are already loaded by other executors in new batch. Each state store provider in the list will go to unload.
### Why are the changes needed?
Per the discussion at #30770, it makes sense to me we should unload inactive state store asap. Now we run a maintenance task periodically to unload inactive state stores. So there will be some delays between a state store becomes inactive and it is unloaded.
However, we can force Spark to always allocate a state store to same executor, by using task locality configuration. This can reduce the possibility to have inactive state store.
Normally, with locality configuration, we might not able to see inactive state store generally. There is still chance an executor can be failed and reallocated, but in this case, inactive state store is also lost too. So it is not an issue.
Making driver-executor bi-directional for unloading inactive state store looks non-trivial, and seems to me, it is not worth, after considering what we can do with locality.
This proposes a simpler but effective approach. We can check if loaded state store is already loaded at other executor during reporting active state store to the coordinator. If so, it means the loaded store is inactive now, and it is going to be unload by the next maintenance task. Then we unload that store immediately.
How do we make sure the loaded state store in previous batch is loaded at other executor in this batch before reporting in this executor? With task locality and preferred location, once an executor is ready to be scheduled, Spark should assign the state store provider previously loaded at the executor. So when this executor gets a new assignment other than previously loaded state store, it means the previously loaded one is already assigned to other executor.
There is still a delay between the state store is loaded at other executor, and unloading it when reporting active state store at this executor. But it should be minimized now. And there won't be multiple state store belonging to same operator are loaded at the same time at one single executor, because once the executor reports any active store, it will unload all inactive stores. This should not be an issue IMHO.
This is a minimal change to unload inactive state store asap without significant change.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30827 from viirya/SPARK-33827.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add comments for the unified datasource tests, describe what kind of tests they contain, and put refs to other test suits.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve code maintenance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running `./dev/scalastyle`.
Closes#30929 from MaxGekk/doc-unified-tests.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Per discuss in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29966#discussion_r531917374
We'd better change `SparkSubmitUtils.resolveMavenCoordinates()` 's return value as `Seq[String]`
### Why are the changes needed?
refactor code
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existed UT
Closes#30922 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-33908.
Authored-by: angerszhu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After CTAS / CREATE TABLE LIKE / CVAS/ alter table add columns, the target tables will display string instead of char/varchar
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#30918 from yaooqinn/SPARK-33901.
Lead-authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are total 15 compilation warnings about `Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated` in Spark code now:
```
[WARNING] /spark-source/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala:2930: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala:2931: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala:2932: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala:2933: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala:2934: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala:2935: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala:2936: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala:2937: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/csv/CSVExprUtils.scala:82: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/csv/CSVExprUtilsSuite.scala:32: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/csv/CSVExprUtilsSuite.scala:79: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParserUtilsSuite.scala:97: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParserUtilsSuite.scala:101: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonParsingOptionsSuite.scala:76: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
[WARNING] /spark-source/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonParsingOptionsSuite.scala:83: Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated, use the literal character instead
```
This pr try to fix these warnnings.
### Why are the changes needed?
Cleanup compilation warnings about `Unicode escapes in triple quoted strings are deprecated`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
Closes#30926 from LuciferYang/SPARK-33801.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, there are many DDL commands where the position of the unresolved identifiers are incorrect:
```
scala> sql("DROP VIEW unknown")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: View not found: unknown; line 1 pos 0;
```
, whereas the `pos` should be `10`.
This PR proposes to fix this issue for commands using `UnresolvedTable`:
```
DROP VIEW v
ALTER VIEW v SET TBLPROPERTIES ('k'='v')
ALTER VIEW v UNSET TBLPROPERTIES ('k')
ALTER VIEW v AS SELECT 1
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now the above example will print the following:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: View not found: unknown; line 1 pos 10;
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add a new suite of tests.
Closes#30936 from imback82/position_view_fix.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr mainly adds a comment for the 'rowgroupoffsets! = null' branch in `SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.init(InputSplit, TaskAttemptContext)` to indicate that spark read parquet process will not enter this branch after SPARK-13883 and SPARK-13989. It is not deleted because PARQUET-131 wants to move `SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase` into the parquet-mr project.
### Why are the changes needed?
Add a useful comment.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
Closes#30484 from LuciferYang/SPARK-33532.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to clarify:
- `PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON` should not be set for cluster modes in YARN and Kubernates.
- `spark.yarn.appMasterEnv.PYSPARK_PYTHON` is not required in YARN. This is just another way to set `PYSPARK_PYTHON` that is specific for a Spark application.
### Why are the changes needed?
To clarify what's required and not.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, this is a user-facing doc change.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Note that this credits to gaborgsomogyi who actually tested and raised a doubt about this offline to me.
I also manually tested all again to double check.
Closes#30938 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33824-followup.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update the SQL migration guide about the changes made by:
- https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30778
- https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30711
- https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30866
### Why are the changes needed?
To inform users about the recent changes in the upcoming releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#30925 from MaxGekk/sql-migr-guide-hiveclientimpl.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Similar to SPARK-33441, this pr add `unused-import` check to Maven compilation process. After this pr `unused-import` will trigger Maven compilation error.
For Scala 2.13 profile, this pr also left TODO(SPARK-33499) similar to SPARK-33441 because `scala.language.higherKinds` no longer needs to be imported explicitly since Scala 2.13.1
### Why are the changes needed?
Let Maven build also check for unused imports as compilation error.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
- Local manual test：add an unused import intentionally to trigger maven compilation error.
Closes#30784 from LuciferYang/SPARK-33560.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[The PySpark documentation](https://spark.apache.org/docs/3.0.1/api/python/pyspark.sql.html#pyspark.sql.DataFrame.join) says "Must be one of: inner, cross, outer, full, fullouter, full_outer, left, leftouter, left_outer, right, rightouter, right_outer, semi, leftsemi, left_semi, anti, leftanti and left_anti."
However, I get the following error when I set the cross option.
```
scala> val df1 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1,"a"),(2,"b")))
df1: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [_1: int, _2: string]
scala> val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(Seq((1,"A"),(2,"B"), (3, "C")))
df2: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [_1: int, _2: string]
scala> df1.join(right = df2, usingColumns = Seq("_1"), joinType = "cross").show()
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed: Unsupported using join type Cross
at scala.Predef$.require(Predef.scala:281)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.UsingJoin.<init>(joinTypes.scala:106)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.join(Dataset.scala:1025)
... 53 elided
```
### Why are the changes needed?
The documentation says cross option can be set, but when I try to set it, I get an java.lang.IllegalArgumentException.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Accepting this PR fix will behave the same as the documentation.
### How was this patch tested?
There is already a test for [JoinTypes](1b9fd67904/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/JoinTypesTest.scala), but I can't find a test for the join option itself.
Closes#30803 from kozakana/allow_cross_option.
Authored-by: kozakana <goki727@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support add jar with ivy path
### Why are the changes needed?
Since submit app can support ivy, add jar we can also support ivy now.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
User can add jar with sql like
```
add jar ivy:://group:artifict:version?exclude=xxx,xxx&transitive=true
add jar ivy:://group:artifict:version?exclude=xxx,xxx&transitive=false
```
core api
```
sparkContext.addJar("ivy:://group:artifict:version?exclude=xxx,xxx&transitive=true")
sparkContext.addJar("ivy:://group:artifict:version?exclude=xxx,xxx&transitive=false")
```
#### Doc Update snapshot
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT
Closes#29966 from AngersZhuuuu/support-add-jar-ivy.
Lead-authored-by: angerszhu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: AngersZhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Unify the seed of random functions
1. Add a hold place expression `UnresolvedSeed ` as the defualt seed.
2. Change `Rand`,`Randn`,`Uuid`,`Shuffle` default seed to `UnresolvedSeed `.
3. Replace `UnresolvedSeed ` to real seed at `ResolveRandomSeed` rule.
### Why are the changes needed?
`Uuid` and `Shuffle` use the `ResolveRandomSeed` rule to set the seed if user doesn't give a seed value. `Rand` and `Randn` do this at constructing.
It's better to unify the default seed at Analyzer side since we have used `ExpressionWithRandomSeed` at streaming query.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass exists test and add test.
Closes#30864 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33857.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Display char/varchar in
- DESC table
- DESC column
- SHOW CREATE TABLE
### Why are the changes needed?
show the correct definition for users
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
yes, char/varchar column's will print char/varchar instead of string
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#30908 from yaooqinn/SPARK-33892.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add tests to check handling `null` and `''` (empty string) as partition values in commands `SHOW PARTITIONS`, `ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION`, `ALTER TABLE .. DROP PARTITION`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suites:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *.ShowPartitionsSuite"
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *.AlterTableAddPartitionSuite"
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *.AlterTableDropPartitionSuite"
```
Closes#30893 from MaxGekk/partition-value-empty-string.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr simplify conditional in predicate, after this change we can push down the filter to datasource:
Expression | After simplify
-- | --
IF(cond, trueVal, false) | AND(cond, trueVal)
IF(cond, trueVal, true) | OR(NOT(cond), trueVal)
IF(cond, false, falseVal) | AND(NOT(cond), elseVal)
IF(cond, true, falseVal) | OR(cond, elseVal)
CASE WHEN cond THEN trueVal ELSE false END | AND(cond, trueVal)
CASE WHEN cond THEN trueVal END | AND(cond, trueVal)
CASE WHEN cond THEN trueVal ELSE null END | AND(cond, trueVal)
CASE WHEN cond THEN trueVal ELSE true END | OR(NOT(cond), trueVal)
CASE WHEN cond THEN false ELSE elseVal END | AND(NOT(cond), elseVal)
CASE WHEN cond THEN false END | false
CASE WHEN cond THEN true ELSE elseVal END | OR(cond, elseVal)
CASE WHEN cond THEN true END | cond
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve query performance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30865 from wangyum/SPARK-33861.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unrecognized type name: CHAR(10)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.SparkGetColumnsOperation.toJavaSQLType(SparkGetColumnsOperation.scala:187)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.SparkGetColumnsOperation.$anonfun$addToRowSet$1(SparkGetColumnsOperation.scala:203)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.SparkGetColumnsOperation.addToRowSet(SparkGetColumnsOperation.scala:195)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.SparkGetColumnsOperation.$anonfun$runInternal$4(SparkGetColumnsOperation.scala:99)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.SparkGetColumnsOperation.$anonfun$runInternal$4$adapted(SparkGetColumnsOperation.scala:98)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:62)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach$(ResizableArray.scala:55)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:49)
```
meta operation is targeting raw table schema, we need to handle these types there.
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix, see the above case
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
locally
Closes#30914 from yaooqinn/SPARK-33895.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, there are many DDL commands where the position of the unresolved identifiers are incorrect:
```
scala> sql("MSCK REPAIR TABLE unknown")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table not found: unknown; line 1 pos 0;
```
, whereas the `pos` should be 18.
This PR proposes to fix this issue for commands using `UnresolvedTable`:
```
MSCK REPAIR TABLE t
LOAD DATA LOCAL INPATH 'filepath' INTO TABLE t
TRUNCATE TABLE t
SHOW PARTITIONS t
ALTER TABLE t RECOVER PARTITIONS
ALTER TABLE t ADD PARTITION (p=1)
ALTER TABLE t PARTITION (p=1) RENAME TO PARTITION (p=2)
ALTER TABLE t DROP PARTITION (p=1)
ALTER TABLE t SET SERDEPROPERTIES ('a'='b')
COMMENT ON TABLE t IS 'hello'"
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now the above example will print the following:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table not found: unknown; line 1 pos 18;
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add a new suite of tests.
Closes#30900 from imback82/position_Fix.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow up work for #30521, document the following behaviors in the API doc:
- Figure out the effects when configurations are (provider/partitionBy) conflicting with the existing table.
- Document the lack of functionality on creating a v2 table, and guide that the users should ensure a table is created in prior to avoid the behavior unintended/insufficient table is being created.
### Why are the changes needed?
We didn't have full support for the V2 table created in the API now. (TODO SPARK-33638)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Document only.
Closes#30885 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-33659.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <yuanjian.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
refector AbstractCommandBuilder.buildJavaCommand: use firstNonEmpty
### Why are the changes needed?
For better code understanding, and firstNonEmpty can detect javaHome = " ", an empty string.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
End to End.
Closes#30831 from offthewall123/refector_AbstractCommandBuilder.
Authored-by: offthewall123 <dingyu.xu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
followup of a3dd8dacee via suggestion https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30888#discussion_r547822642
### Why are the changes needed?
doc improvement
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
passing GA doc
Closes#30909 from yaooqinn/SPARK-33877-F.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to exclude fallback block manager from `executorList` function.
### Why are the changes needed?
When a fallback storage is used, the executors UI tab hangs because the executor list REST API result doesn't have `peakMemoryMetrics` of `ExecutorMetrics`. The root cause is that the block manager id used by fallback storage is included in the API result and it doesn't have `peakMemoryMetrics` because it's populated during HeartBeat reporting. We should hide it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is a bug fix on UI.
### How was this patch tested?
Manual. Run the following and visit Spark `executors` tab UI with browser.
```
bin/spark-shell -c spark.storage.decommission.fallbackStorage.path=file:///tmp/spark-storage/
```
Closes#30911 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-33893.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a retry of #30177.
This is not a complete fix, but it would take long time to complete (#30242).
As discussed offline, at least using `ContextAwareIterator` should be helpful enough for many cases.
As the Python evaluation consumes the parent iterator in a separate thread, it could consume more data from the parent even after the task ends and the parent is closed. Thus, we should use `ContextAwareIterator` to stop consuming after the task ends.
### Why are the changes needed?
Python/Pandas UDF right after off-heap vectorized reader could cause executor crash.
E.g.,:
```py
spark.range(0, 100000, 1, 1).write.parquet(path)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.columnVector.offheap.enabled", True)
def f(x):
return 0
fUdf = udf(f, LongType())
spark.read.parquet(path).select(fUdf('id')).head()
```
This is because, the Python evaluation consumes the parent iterator in a separate thread and it consumes more data from the parent even after the task ends and the parent is closed. If an off-heap column vector exists in the parent iterator, it could cause segmentation fault which crashes the executor.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests, and manually.
Closes#30899 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-33277/context_aware_iterator.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Fixes for bugs in `RemoteBlockPushResolver` where the number of chunks in meta file and index file are inconsistent due to exceptions while writing to either index file or meta file. This java class was introduced in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30062.
- If the writing to index file fails, the position of meta file is not reset. This means that the number of chunks in meta file is inconsistent with index file.
- During the exception handling while writing to index/meta file, we just set the pointer to the start position. If the files are closed just after this then it doesn't get rid of any the extra bytes written to it.
2. Adds an IOException threshold. If the `RemoteBlockPushResolver` encounters IOExceptions greater than this threshold while updating data/meta/index file of a shuffle partition, then it responds to the client with exception- `IOExceptions exceeded the threshold` so that client can stop pushing data for this shuffle partition.
3. When the update to metadata fails, exception is not propagated back to the client. This results in the increased size of the current chunk. However, with (2) in place, the current chunk will still be of a manageable size.
### Why are the changes needed?
This fix is needed for the bugs mentioned above.
1. Moved writing to meta file after index file. This fixes the issue because if there is an exception writing to meta file, then the index file position is not updated. With this change, if there is an exception writing to index file, then none of the files are effectively updated and the same is true vice-versa.
2. Truncating the lengths of data/index/meta files when the partition is finalized.
3. When the IOExceptions have reached the threshold, it is most likely that future blocks will also face the issue. So, it is better to let the clients know so that they can stop pushing the blocks for that partition.
4. When just the meta update fails, client retries pushing the block which was successfully merged to data file. This can be avoided by letting the chunk grow slightly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests for all the bugs and threshold.
Closes#30433 from otterc/SPARK-32916-followup.
Authored-by: Chandni Singh <singh.chandni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mridul Muralidharan <mridul<at>gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Enhance `ReplaceNullWithFalseInPredicate` to replace None of elseValue inside `CaseWhen` with `FalseLiteral` if all branches are `FalseLiteral` . The use case is:
```sql
create table t1 using parquet as select id from range(10);
explain select id from t1 where (CASE WHEN id = 1 THEN 'a' WHEN id = 3 THEN 'b' end) = 'c';
```
Before this pr:
```
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Filter CASE WHEN (id#1L = 1) THEN false WHEN (id#1L = 3) THEN false END
+- *(1) ColumnarToRow
+- FileScan parquet default.t1[id#1L] Batched: true, DataFilters: [CASE WHEN (id#1L = 1) THEN false WHEN (id#1L = 3) THEN false END], Format: Parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/Users/yumwang/opensource/spark/spark-warehouse/org.apache.spark.sql.DataF..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [], ReadSchema: struct<id:bigint>
```
After this pr:
```
== Physical Plan ==
LocalTableScan <empty>, [id#1L]
```
2. Enhance `SimplifyConditionals` if elseValue is None and all outputs are null.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve query performance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30852 from wangyum/SPARK-33847.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
At `ShowPartitionsExec.run()`, check that a row returned by `listPartitionIdentifiers()` contains a `null` field, and convert it to `"null"`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Because `SHOW PARTITIONS` throws NPE on V2 table with `null` partition values.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Added new UT to `v2.ShowPartitionsSuite`.
Closes#30904 from MaxGekk/fix-npe-show-partitions.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Move the `ALTER TABLE .. RENAME PARTITION` parsing tests to `AlterTableRenamePartitionParserSuite`
2. Place the v1 tests for `ALTER TABLE .. RENAME PARTITION` from `DDLSuite` to `v1.AlterTableRenamePartitionSuite` and v2 tests from `AlterTablePartitionV2SQLSuite` to `v2.AlterTableRenamePartitionSuite`, so, the tests will run for V1, Hive V1 and V2 DS.
### Why are the changes needed?
- The unification will allow to run common `ALTER TABLE .. RENAME PARTITION` tests for both DSv1 and Hive DSv1, DSv2
- We can detect missing features and differences between DSv1 and DSv2 implementations.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running new test suites:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *AlterTableRenamePartitionParserSuite"
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *AlterTableRenamePartitionSuite"
```
Closes#30863 from MaxGekk/unify-rename-partition-tests.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to override maxRows method in these follow `LogicalPlan`:
* `ReturnAnswer`
* `Join`
* `Range`
* `Sample`
* `RepartitionOperation`
* `Deduplicate`
* `LocalRelation`
* `Window`
### Why are the changes needed?
1. Logically, we know the max rows info with these `LogicalPlan`.
2. Before this PR, we already have some max rows with `LogicalPlan`, so we can eliminate limit with more case if we expand more.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Add test.
Closes#30443 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33497.
Lead-authored-by: ulysses-you <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Co-authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Add new methods `purgePartition()`/`purgePartitions()` to the interfaces `SupportsPartitionManagement`/`SupportsAtomicPartitionManagement`.
2. Default implementation of new methods throw the exception `UnsupportedOperationException`.
3. Add tests for new methods to `SupportsPartitionManagementSuite`/`SupportsAtomicPartitionManagementSuite`.
4. Add `ALTER TABLE .. DROP PARTITION` tests for DS v1 and v2.
Closes#30776Closes#30821
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the `PURGE` option that user can set in `ALTER TABLE .. DROP PARTITION` is completely ignored. We should pass this flag to the catalog implementation, so, the catalog should decide how to handle the flag.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The changes can impact on behavior of `ALTER TABLE .. DROP PARTITION` for v2 tables.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the affected test suites, for instance:
```
$ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *AlterTableDropPartitionSuite"
```
Closes#30886 from MaxGekk/purge-partition.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28788, and proposes to update migration guide.
### Why are the changes needed?
To tell users about the behaviour change.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it updates migration guides for users.
### How was this patch tested?
GitHub Actions' documentation build should test it.
Closes#30903 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31960-followup.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```sql
spark-sql> select * from t10 where c0='abcd';
20/12/22 15:43:38 ERROR SparkSQLDriver: Failed in [select * from t10 where c0='abcd']
scala.MatchError: CharType(10) (of class org.apache.spark.sql.types.CharType)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.cast(Cast.scala:815)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.cast$lzycompute(Cast.scala:842)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.cast(Cast.scala:842)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.nullSafeEval(Cast.scala:844)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnaryExpression.eval(Expression.scala:476)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.CatalogTablePartition.$anonfun$toRow$2(interface.scala:164)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:238)
at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:941)
at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach$(Iterator.scala:941)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1429)
at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach(IterableLike.scala:74)
at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach$(IterableLike.scala:73)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType.foreach(StructType.scala:102)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:238)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:231)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType.map(StructType.scala:102)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.CatalogTablePartition.toRow(interface.scala:158)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.ExternalCatalogUtils$.$anonfun$prunePartitionsByFilter$3(ExternalCatalogUtils.scala:157)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.catalog.ExternalCatalogUtils$.$anonfun$prunePartitionsByFilter$3$adapted(ExternalCatalogUtils.scala:156)
```
c0 is a partition column, it fails in the partition pruning rule
In this PR, we relace char/varchar w/ string type before the CAST happends
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix, see the case above
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
yes, new tests
Closes#30887 from yaooqinn/SPARK-33879.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make test stable and fix docs.
### Why are the changes needed?
Query timeout sometime since we set an another config after set query timeout.
```
sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: java.sql.SQLTimeoutException: Query timed out after 0 seconds
at org.apache.hive.jdbc.HiveStatement.waitForOperationToComplete(HiveStatement.java:381)
at org.apache.hive.jdbc.HiveStatement.execute(HiveStatement.java:254)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.ThriftServerWithSparkContextSuite.$anonfun$$init$$13(ThriftServerWithSparkContextSuite.scala:107)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.ThriftServerWithSparkContextSuite.$anonfun$$init$$13$adapted(ThriftServerWithSparkContextSuite.scala:106)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.ThriftServerWithSparkContextSuite.$anonfun$$init$$12(ThriftServerWithSparkContextSuite.scala:106)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.ThriftServerWithSparkContextSuite.$anonfun$$init$$12$adapted(ThriftServerWithSparkContextSuite.scala:89)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.SharedThriftServer.$anonfun$withJdbcStatement$4(SharedThriftServer.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thriftserver.SharedThriftServer.$anonfun$withJdbcStatement$4$adapted(SharedThriftServer.scala:95)
```
The reason is:
1. we execute `set spark.sql.thriftServer.queryTimeout = 1`, then all the option will be limited in 1s.
2. we execute `set spark.sql.thriftServer.interruptOnCancel = false/true`. This sql will get timeout exception if there is something hung within 1s. It's not our expected.
Reset the timeout before we do the step2 can avoid this problem.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Fix test.
Closes#30897 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33526-followup.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to enable `spark.storage.replication.proactive` by default for Apache Spark 3.2.0.
### Why are the changes needed?
`spark.storage.replication.proactive` is added by SPARK-15355 at Apache Spark 2.2.0 and has been helpful when the block manager loss occurs frequently like K8s environment.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, this will make the Spark jobs more robust.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing UTs.
Closes#30876 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-33870.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to fix flaky GitHub Actions (GA) tests below in `transform.sql` (this flakiness does not seem to happen in the Jenkins tests):
- https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/1592987501
- https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/1593196242
- https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/1595496305
- https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/1596309555
This is because the error message is different between test runs in GA (the error message seems to be truncated indeterministically) ,e.g.,
```
# https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/1592987501
Expected "...h status 127. Error:[ /bin/bash: some_non_existent_command: command not found]", but got "...h status 127. Error:[]" Result did not match for query #2
# https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/1593196242
Expected "...istent_command: comm[and not found]", but got "...istent_command: comm[]" Result did not match for query #2
```
The root cause of this indeterministic behaviour happening only in GA is not clear though, this test throws SparkException consistently even in GA. So, this PR proposes to make the test just check if it will be thrown when running it.
This PR comes from the dongjoon-hyun comment: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29414/files#r547414513
### Why are the changes needed?
Bugfix.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#30896 from maropu/SPARK-32106-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30267
Inspired by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30886, it's better to have 2 methods `def dropTable` and `def purgeTable`, than `def dropTable(ident)` and `def dropTable(ident, purge)`.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. make the APIs orthogonal. Previously, `def dropTable(ident, purge)` calls `def dropTable(ident)` and is a superset.
2. simplifies the catalog implementation a little bit. Now the `if (purge) ... else ...` check is done at the Spark side.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#30890 from cloud-fan/purgeTable.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for Java Enums (`java.lang.Enum`) from the Scala typed Dataset APIs. This involves adding an implicit for `Encoder` creation in `SQLImplicits`, and updating `ScalaReflection` to handle Java Enums on the serialization and deserialization pathways.
Enums are mapped to a `StringType` which is just the name of the Enum value.
### Why are the changes needed?
In [SPARK-21255](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21255), support for (de)serialization of Java Enums was added, but only when called from Java code. It is common for Scala code to rely on Java libraries that are out of control of the Scala developer. Today, if there is a dependency on some Java code which defines an Enum, it would be necessary to define a corresponding Scala class. This change brings closer feature parity between Scala and Java APIs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, previously something like:
```
val ds = Seq(MyJavaEnum.VALUE1, MyJavaEnum.VALUE2).toDS
// or
val ds = Seq(CaseClass(MyJavaEnum.VALUE1), CaseClass(MyJavaEnum.VALUE2)).toDS
```
would fail. Now, it will succeed.
### How was this patch tested?
Additional unit tests are added in `DatasetSuite`. Tests include validating top-level enums, enums inside of case classes, enums inside of arrays, and validating that the Enum is stored as the expected string.
Closes#30877 from xkrogen/xkrogen-SPARK-23862-scalareflection-java-enums.
Lead-authored-by: Erik Krogen <xkrogen@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Fangshi Li <fli@linkedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
