## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to set the number of parallelism to prevent file listing in `listLeafFilesInParallel` from generating many tasks in case of large #defaultParallelism.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually checked
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
Closes#13444 from maropu/SPARK-15530.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When creating a Hive Table (not data source tables), a common error users might make is to specify an existing column name as a partition column. Below is what Hive returns in this case:
```
hive> CREATE TABLE partitioned (id bigint, data string) PARTITIONED BY (data string, part string);
FAILED: SemanticException [Error 10035]: Column repeated in partitioning columns
```
Currently, the error we issued is very confusing:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException: MetaException(message:For direct MetaStore DB connections, we don't support retries at the client level.);
```
This PR is to fix the above issue by capturing the usage error in `Parser`.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case to `DDLCommandSuite`
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13415 from gatorsmile/partitionColumnsInTableSchema.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch does some replacing (as `streaming Datasets/DataFrames` is the term we've chosen in [SPARK-15593](00c310133d)):
- `continuous queries` -> `streaming Datasets/DataFrames`
- `non-continuous queries` -> `non-streaming Datasets/DataFrames`
This patch also adds `test("check foreach() can only be called on streaming Datasets/DataFrames")`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>
Closes#13595 from lw-lin/continuous-queries-to-streaming-dss-dfs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Unblock some of the useful repl commands. like, "implicits", "javap", "power", "type", "kind". As they are useful and fully functional and part of scala/scala project, I see no harm in having them either.
Verbatim paste form JIRA description.
"implicits", "javap", "power", "type", "kind" commands in repl are blocked. However, they work fine in all cases I have tried. It is clear we don't support them as they are part of the scala/scala repl project. What is the harm in unblocking them, given they are useful ?
In previous versions of spark we disabled these commands because it was difficult to support them without customization and the associated maintenance. Since the code base of scala repl was actually ported and maintained under spark source. Now that is not the situation and one can benefit from these commands in Spark REPL as much as in scala repl.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and manual, by trying out all of the above commands.
P.S. Symantics of reset are to be discussed in a separate issue.
Author: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Closes#13437 from ScrapCodes/SPARK-15697/repl-unblock-commands.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Dispatcher.stopped` is guarded by `this`, but it is used without synchronization in `postMessage` function. This PR fixes this and also the exception message became more accurate.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing Jenkins tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13634 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15913.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's similar to the bug fixed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13425, we should consider null object and wrap the `CreateStruct` with `If` to do null check.
This PR also improves the test framework to test the objects of `Dataset[T]` directly, instead of calling `toDF` and compare the rows.
## How was this patch tested?
new test in `DatasetAggregatorSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13553 from cloud-fan/agg-null.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add new desired executor number to make the log message less ambiguous.
## How was this patch tested?
This is a trivial change
Author: Peter Ableda <abledapeter@gmail.com>
Closes#13552 from peterableda/patch-1.
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes the COUNT bug in the `RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery` rule.
After this change, the rule tests the expression at the root of the correlated subquery to determine whether the expression returns `NULL` on empty input. If the expression does not return `NULL`, the rule generates additional logic in the `Project` operator above the rewritten subquery. This additional logic intercepts `NULL` values coming from the outer join and replaces them with the value that the subquery's expression would return on empty input.
This PR takes over https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155. It only fixes an issue with `Literal` construction and style issues. All credits should go frreiss.
# How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests to cover all branches of the updated rule (see changes to `SubquerySuite`).
Ran all existing automated regression tests after merging with latest trunk.
Author: frreiss <frreiss@us.ibm.com>
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#13629 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15370-cleanup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If a cached `DataFrame` executed more than once and then do `uncacheTable` like the following:
```
val selectStar = sql("SELECT * FROM testData WHERE key = 1")
selectStar.createOrReplaceTempView("selectStar")
spark.catalog.cacheTable("selectStar")
checkAnswer(
selectStar,
Seq(Row(1, "1")))
spark.catalog.uncacheTable("selectStar")
checkAnswer(
selectStar,
Seq(Row(1, "1")))
```
, then the uncached `DataFrame` can't execute because of `Task not serializable` exception like:
```
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Task not serializable
at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.ensureSerializable(ClosureCleaner.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.org$apache$spark$util$ClosureCleaner$$clean(ClosureCleaner.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.util.ClosureCleaner$.clean(ClosureCleaner.scala:108)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.clean(SparkContext.scala:2038)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.runJob(SparkContext.scala:1897)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.runJob(SparkContext.scala:1912)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$collect$1.apply(RDD.scala:884)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:112)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.withScope(RDD.scala:357)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.collect(RDD.scala:883)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeCollect(SparkPlan.scala:290)
...
Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Accumulator must be registered before send to executor
at org.apache.spark.util.AccumulatorV2.writeReplace(AccumulatorV2.scala:153)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeWriteReplace(ObjectStreamClass.java:1118)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1136)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1548)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1509)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1432)
...
```
Notice that `DataFrame` uncached with `DataFrame.unpersist()` works, but with `spark.catalog.uncacheTable` doesn't work.
This pr reverts a part of cf38fe0 not to unregister `batchStats` accumulator, which is not needed to be unregistered here because it will be done by `ContextCleaner` after it is collected by GC.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to check if DataFrame can execute after uncacheTable and other existing tests.
But I made a test to check if the accumulator was cleared as `ignore` because the test would be flaky.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#13596 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-15870.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `AFTAggregator` is not being merged correctly. For example, if there is any single empty partition in the data, this creates an `AFTAggregator` with zero total count which causes the exception below:
```
IllegalArgumentException: u'requirement failed: The number of instances should be greater than 0.0, but got 0.'
```
Please see [AFTSurvivalRegression.scala#L573-L575](6ecedf39b4/mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegression.scala (L573-L575)) as well.
Just to be clear, the python example `aft_survival_regression.py` seems using 5 rows. So, if there exist partitions more than 5, it throws the exception above since it contains empty partitions which results in an incorrectly merged `AFTAggregator`.
Executing `bin/spark-submit examples/src/main/python/ml/aft_survival_regression.py` on a machine with CPUs more than 5 is being failed because it creates tasks with some empty partitions with defualt configurations (AFAIK, it sets the parallelism level to the number of CPU cores).
## How was this patch tested?
An unit test in `AFTSurvivalRegressionSuite.scala` and manually tested by `bin/spark-submit examples/src/main/python/ml/aft_survival_regression.py`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Author: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#13619 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-15892.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Queries with embedded existential sub-query predicates throws exception when building the physical plan.
Example failing query:
```SQL
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t1")
scala> Seq((1, 1), (2, 2)).toDF("c1", "c2").createOrReplaceTempView("t2")
scala> sql("select c1 from t1 where (case when c2 in (select c2 from t2) then 2 else 3 end) IN (select c2 from t1)").show()
Binding attribute, tree: c2#239
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: c2#239
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
...
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$.bindReference(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$$anonfun$4.apply(HashJoin.scala:66)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$$anonfun$4.apply(HashJoin.scala:66)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:381)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:285)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$class.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$joins$HashJoin$$x$8(HashJoin.scala:66)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$joins$HashJoin$$x$8$lzycompute(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$joins$HashJoin$$x$8(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.HashJoin$class.buildKeys(HashJoin.scala:63)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.buildKeys$lzycompute(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.buildKeys(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.joins.BroadcastHashJoinExec.requiredChildDistribution(BroadcastHashJoinExec.scala:52)
```
**Problem description:**
When the left hand side expression of an existential sub-query predicate contains another embedded sub-query predicate, the RewritePredicateSubquery optimizer rule does not resolve the embedded sub-query expressions into existential joins.For example, the above query has the following optimized plan, which fails during physical plan build.
```SQL
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [_1#224 AS c1#227]
+- Join LeftSemi, (CASE WHEN predicate-subquery#255 [(_2#225 = c2#239)] THEN 2 ELSE 3 END = c2#228#262)
: +- SubqueryAlias predicate-subquery#255 [(_2#225 = c2#239)]
: +- LocalRelation [c2#239]
:- LocalRelation [_1#224, _2#225]
+- LocalRelation [c2#228#262]
== Physical Plan ==
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: c2#239
```
**Solution:**
In RewritePredicateSubquery, before rewriting the outermost predicate sub-query, resolve any embedded existential sub-queries. The Optimized plan for the above query after the changes looks like below.
```SQL
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [_1#224 AS c1#227]
+- Join LeftSemi, (CASE WHEN exists#285 THEN 2 ELSE 3 END = c2#228#284)
:- Join ExistenceJoin(exists#285), (_2#225 = c2#239)
: :- LocalRelation [_1#224, _2#225]
: +- LocalRelation [c2#239]
+- LocalRelation [c2#228#284]
== Physical Plan ==
*Project [_1#224 AS c1#227]
+- *BroadcastHashJoin [CASE WHEN exists#285 THEN 2 ELSE 3 END], [c2#228#284], LeftSemi, BuildRight
:- *BroadcastHashJoin [_2#225], [c2#239], ExistenceJoin(exists#285), BuildRight
: :- LocalTableScan [_1#224, _2#225]
: +- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as bigint)))
: +- LocalTableScan [c2#239]
+- BroadcastExchange HashedRelationBroadcastMode(List(cast(input[0, int, false] as bigint)))
+- LocalTableScan [c2#228#284]
+- LocalTableScan [c222#36], [[111],[222]]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test cases in SubquerySuite.scala
Author: Ioana Delaney <ioanamdelaney@gmail.com>
Closes#13570 from ioana-delaney/fixEmbedSubPredV1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes the COUNT bug in the `RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery` rule.
After this change, the rule tests the expression at the root of the correlated subquery to determine whether the expression returns NULL on empty input. If the expression does not return NULL, the rule generates additional logic in the Project operator above the rewritten subquery. This additional logic intercepts NULL values coming from the outer join and replaces them with the value that the subquery's expression would return on empty input.
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests to cover all branches of the updated rule (see changes to `SubquerySuite.scala`).
Ran all existing automated regression tests after merging with latest trunk.
Author: frreiss <frreiss@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13155 from frreiss/master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove deprecated support for `zk://` master (`mesos://zk//` remains supported)
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#13625 from srowen/SPARK-15876.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Deprecate old Java accumulator API; should use Scala now
- Update Java tests and examples
- Don't bother testing old accumulator API in Java 8 (too)
- (fix a misspelling too)
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#13606 from srowen/SPARK-15086.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK_MASTER_IP is a deprecated environment variable. It is replaced by SPARK_MASTER_HOST according to MasterArguments.scala.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually verified.
Author: bomeng <bmeng@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13543 from bomeng/SPARK-15806.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Like `SPARK_JAVA_OPTS` and `SPARK_CLASSPATH`, we will remove the document for `SPARK_WORKER_INSTANCES` to discourage user not to use them. If they are actually used, SparkConf will show a warning message as before.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Author: bomeng <bmeng@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13533 from bomeng/SPARK-15781.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These tests weren't properly using `LocalSparkContext` so weren't cleaning up correctly when tests failed.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins.
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes#13602 from squito/SPARK-15878_cleanup_replaylistener.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds codahale metrics for the codegen source text size and how long it takes to compile. The size is particularly interesting, since the JVM does have hard limits on how large methods can get.
To simplify, I added the metrics under a statically-initialized source that is always registered with SparkEnv.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#13586 from ericl/spark-15860.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds support for radix sort of nullable long fields. When a sort field is null and radix sort is enabled, we keep nulls in a separate region of the sort buffer so that radix sort does not need to deal with them. This also has performance benefits when sorting smaller integer types, since the current representation of nulls in two's complement (Long.MIN_VALUE) otherwise forces a full-width radix sort.
This strategy for nulls does mean the sort is no longer stable. cc davies
## How was this patch tested?
Existing randomized sort tests for correctness. I also tested some TPCDS queries and there does not seem to be any significant regression for non-null sorts.
Some test queries (best of 5 runs each).
Before change:
scala> val start = System.nanoTime; spark.range(5000000).selectExpr("if(id > 5, cast(hash(id) as long), NULL) as h").coalesce(1).orderBy("h").collect(); (System.nanoTime - start) / 1e6
start: Long = 3190437233227987
res3: Double = 4716.471091
After change:
scala> val start = System.nanoTime; spark.range(5000000).selectExpr("if(id > 5, cast(hash(id) as long), NULL) as h").coalesce(1).orderBy("h").collect(); (System.nanoTime - start) / 1e6
start: Long = 3190367870952791
res4: Double = 2981.143045
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#13161 from ericl/sc-2998.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's easy for users to call `range(...).as[Long]` to get typed Dataset, and don't worth an API breaking change. This PR reverts it.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13605 from cloud-fan/range.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These were not updated after performance improvements. To make updating them easier, I also moved the results from inline comments out into a file, which is auto-generated when the benchmark is re-run.
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#13607 from ericl/sc-3538.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to add doc for turning off quotations because this behavior is different from `com.databricks.spark.csv`.
## How was this patch tested?
Check behavior to put an empty string in csv options.
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
Closes#13616 from maropu/SPARK-15585-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use new Spark logo including "Apache" (now, with crushed PNGs). Remove old unreferenced logo files.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual check of generated HTML site and Spark UI. I searched for references to the deleted files to make sure they were not used.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#13609 from srowen/SPARK-15879.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In case of any bugs in whole-stage codegen, the generated code can't be compiled, we should fallback to non-codegen to make sure that query could run.
The batch mode of new parquet reader depends on codegen, can't be easily switched to non-batch mode, so we still use codegen for batched scan (for parquet). Because it only support primitive types and the number of columns is less than spark.sql.codegen.maxFields (100), it should not fail.
This could be configurable by `spark.sql.codegen.fallback`
## How was this patch tested?
Manual test it with buggy operator, it worked well.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13501 from davies/codegen_fallback.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark currently incorrectly continues to use cached data even if the underlying data is overwritten.
Current behavior:
```scala
val dir = "/tmp/test"
sqlContext.range(1000).write.mode("overwrite").parquet(dir)
val df = sqlContext.read.parquet(dir).cache()
df.count() // outputs 1000
sqlContext.range(10).write.mode("overwrite").parquet(dir)
sqlContext.read.parquet(dir).count() // outputs 1000 <---- We are still using the cached dataset
```
This patch fixes this bug by adding support for `REFRESH path` that invalidates and refreshes all the cached data (and the associated metadata) for any dataframe that contains the given data source path.
Expected behavior:
```scala
val dir = "/tmp/test"
sqlContext.range(1000).write.mode("overwrite").parquet(dir)
val df = sqlContext.read.parquet(dir).cache()
df.count() // outputs 1000
sqlContext.range(10).write.mode("overwrite").parquet(dir)
spark.catalog.refreshResource(dir)
sqlContext.read.parquet(dir).count() // outputs 10 <---- We are not using the cached dataset
```
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests for overwrites and appends in `ParquetQuerySuite` and `CachedTableSuite`.
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#13566 from sameeragarwal/refresh-path-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes Python examples to use the new ML Vector and Matrix APIs in the ML pipeline based algorithms.
I firstly executed this shell command, `grep -r "from pyspark.mllib" .` and then executed them all.
Some of tests in `ml` produced the error messages as below:
```
pyspark.sql.utils.IllegalArgumentException: u'requirement failed: Input type must be VectorUDT but got org.apache.spark.mllib.linalg.VectorUDTf71b0bce.'
```
So, I fixed them to use new ones just identically with some Python tests fixed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested for all the examples listed by `grep -r "from pyspark.mllib" .`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#13393 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-14615.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The base class `SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase` used for vectorized parquet reader will try to get pushed-down filters from the given configuration. This pushed-down filters are used for RowGroups-level filtering. However, we don't set up the filters to push down into the configuration. In other words, the filters are not actually pushed down to do RowGroups-level filtering. This patch is to fix this and tries to set up the filters for pushing down to configuration for the reader.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should be passed.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#13371 from viirya/vectorized-reader-push-down-filter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As discussed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
we need to override stringArgs method in MapPartitionsInR in order to avoid too large strings generated by "stringArgs" method based on the input arguments.
In this case exclude some of the input arguments: serialized R objects.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases
Author: Narine Kokhlikyan <narine.kokhlikyan@gmail.com>
Closes#13610 from NarineK/dapply_MapPartitionsInR_stringArgs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Instead of using local variable `sc` like the following example, this PR uses `spark.sparkContext`. This makes examples more concise, and also fixes some misleading, i.e., creating SparkContext from SparkSession.
```
- println("Creating SparkContext")
- val sc = spark.sparkContext
-
println("Writing local file to DFS")
val dfsFilename = dfsDirPath + "/dfs_read_write_test"
- val fileRDD = sc.parallelize(fileContents)
+ val fileRDD = spark.sparkContext.parallelize(fileContents)
```
This will change 12 files (+30 lines, -52 lines).
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13520 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15773.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Serializer instantiation will consider existing SparkConf
## How was this patch tested?
manual test with `ImmutableList` (Guava) and `kryo-serializers`'s `Immutable*Serializer` implementations.
Added Test Suite.
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Author: Sela <ansela@paypal.com>
Closes#13424 from amitsela/SPARK-15489.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we always split the files when it's bigger than maxSplitBytes, but Hadoop LineRecordReader does not respect the splits for compressed files correctly, we should have a API for FileFormat to check whether the file could be splitted or not.
This PR is based on #13442, closes#13442
## How was this patch tested?
add regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13531 from davies/fix_split.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Code generated `SortMergeJoin` failed with wrong results when using structs as keys. This could (eventually) be traced back to the use of a wrong row reference when comparing structs.
## How was this patch tested?
TBD
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#13589 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15822.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In scala, immutable.List.length is an expensive operation so we should
avoid using Seq.length == 0 or Seq.lenth > 0, and use Seq.isEmpty and Seq.nonEmpty instead.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: wangyang <wangyang@haizhi.com>
Closes#13601 from yangw1234/isEmpty.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace all occurrences of `None: Option[X]` with `Option.empty[X]`
## How was this patch tested?
Exisiting Tests
Author: Sandeep Singh <sandeep@techaddict.me>
Closes#13591 from techaddict/minor-7.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR moves `QueryPlanner.planLater()` method into `GenericStrategy` for extra strategies to be able to use `planLater` in its strategy.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st>
Closes#13147 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-6320.
This reverts commit 695dbc816a.
This change is being reverted because it hurts performance of some jobs, and
only helps in a narrow set of cases. For more discussion, refer to the JIRA.
Author: Kay Ousterhout <kayousterhout@gmail.com>
Closes#13580 from kayousterhout/revert-SPARK-14485.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When reviewing SPARK-15545, we found that is.nan is not exported, which should be exported.
Add it to the NAMESPACE.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests.
Author: wm624@hotmail.com <wm624@hotmail.com>
Closes#13508 from wangmiao1981/unused.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When saving datasets on storage, `partitionBy` provides an easy way to construct the directory structure. However, if a user choose all columns as partition columns, some exceptions occurs.
- **ORC with all column partitioning**: `AnalysisException` on **future read** due to schema inference failure.
```scala
scala> spark.range(10).write.format("orc").mode("overwrite").partitionBy("id").save("/tmp/data")
scala> spark.read.format("orc").load("/tmp/data").collect()
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Unable to infer schema for ORC at /tmp/data. It must be specified manually;
```
- **Parquet with all-column partitioning**: `InvalidSchemaException` on **write execution** due to Parquet limitation.
```scala
scala> spark.range(100).write.format("parquet").mode("overwrite").partitionBy("id").save("/tmp/data")
[Stage 0:> (0 + 8) / 8]16/06/02 16:51:17
ERROR Utils: Aborting task
org.apache.parquet.schema.InvalidSchemaException: A group type can not be empty. Parquet does not support empty group without leaves. Empty group: spark_schema
... (lots of error messages)
```
Although some formats like JSON support all-column partitioning without any problem, it seems not a good idea to make lots of empty directories.
This PR prevents saving with all-column partitioning by consistently raising `AnalysisException` before executing save operation.
## How was this patch tested?
Newly added `PartitioningUtilsSuite`.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13486 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-15743.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding __str__ to RFormula and model that will show the set formula param and resolved formula. This is currently present in the Scala API, found missing in PySpark during Spark 2.0 coverage review.
## How was this patch tested?
run pyspark-ml tests locally
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#13481 from BryanCutler/pyspark-ml-rformula_str-SPARK-15738.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkContext.listAccumulator, by Spark's convention, makes it sound like "list" is a verb and the method should return a list of accumulators. This patch renames the method and the class collection accumulator.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated test case to reflect the names.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#13594 from rxin/SPARK-15866.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch moves some codes in `DataFrameWriter.insertInto` that belongs to `Analyzer`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes#13496 from viirya/move-analyzer-stuff.