## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the initial buffer size in the sorter is hard coded inside the code and is too small for large workload. As a result, the sorter spends significant time expanding the buffer size and copying the data. It would be useful to have it configurable.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested by running a job on the cluster.
Author: Sital Kedia <skedia@fb.com>
Closes#13699 from sitalkedia/config_sort_buffer_upstream.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Just adjust the size of an array in line 58 so it does not cause an ArrayOutOfBoundsException in line 66.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests. I have recompiled the entire project with the fix, it has been built successfully and I have run the code, also with good results.
line 66: val yD = blas.ddot(trueWeights.length, x, 1, trueWeights, 1) + rnd.nextGaussian() * 0.1
crashes because trueWeights has length "nfeatures + 1" while "x" has length "features", and they should have the same length.
To fix this just make trueWeights be the same length as x.
I have recompiled the project with the change and it is working now:
[spark-1.6.1]$ spark-submit --master local[*] --class org.apache.spark.mllib.util.SVMDataGenerator mllib/target/spark-mllib_2.11-1.6.1.jar local /home/user/test
And it generates the data successfully now in the specified folder.
Author: José Antonio <joseanmunoz@gmail.com>
Closes#13895 from j4munoz/patch-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
One of the most frequent usage patterns for Spark SQL is using **cached tables**. This PR improves `InMemoryTableScanExec` to handle `IN` predicate efficiently by pruning partition batches. Of course, the performance improvement varies over the queries and the datasets. But, for the following simple query, the query duration in Spark UI goes from 9 seconds to 50~90ms. It's about over 100 times faster.
**Before**
```scala
$ bin/spark-shell --driver-memory 6G
scala> val df = spark.range(2000000000)
scala> df.createOrReplaceTempView("t")
scala> spark.catalog.cacheTable("t")
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect() // About 2 mins
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect() // less than 90ms
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // 9 seconds
```
**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // less than 90ms
```
This PR has impacts over 35 queries of TPC-DS if the tables are cached.
Note that this optimization is applied for `IN`. To apply `IN` predicate having more than 10 items, `spark.sql.optimizer.inSetConversionThreshold` option should be increased.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests (including new testcases).
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13887 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16186.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`CollectSet` cannot have map-typed data because MapTypeData does not implement `equals`.
So, this pr is to add type checks in `CheckAnalysis`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests to check failures when we found map-typed data in `CollectSet`.
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
Closes#13892 from maropu/SPARK-16192.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow to specify empty over clause in window expressions through dataset API
In SQL, its allowed to specify an empty OVER clause in the window expression.
```SQL
select area, sum(product) over () as c from windowData
where product > 3 group by area, product
having avg(month) > 0 order by avg(month), product
```
In this case the analytic function sum is presented based on all the rows of the result set
Currently its not allowed through dataset API and is handled in this PR.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test in DataframeWindowSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13897 from dilipbiswal/spark-empty-over.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes `DataFrame.describe()` by forcing materialization to make the `Seq` serializable. Currently, `describe()` of DataFrame throws `Task not serializable` Spark exceptions when joining in Scala 2.10.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual. (After building with Scala 2.10, test on `bin/spark-shell` and `bin/pyspark`.)
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13900 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16173.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
One of the most frequent usage patterns for Spark SQL is using **cached tables**. This PR improves `InMemoryTableScanExec` to handle `IN` predicate efficiently by pruning partition batches. Of course, the performance improvement varies over the queries and the datasets. But, for the following simple query, the query duration in Spark UI goes from 9 seconds to 50~90ms. It's about over 100 times faster.
**Before**
```scala
$ bin/spark-shell --driver-memory 6G
scala> val df = spark.range(2000000000)
scala> df.createOrReplaceTempView("t")
scala> spark.catalog.cacheTable("t")
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect() // About 2 mins
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect() // less than 90ms
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // 9 seconds
```
**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // less than 90ms
```
This PR has impacts over 35 queries of TPC-DS if the tables are cached.
Note that this optimization is applied for `IN`. To apply `IN` predicate having more than 10 items, `spark.sql.optimizer.inSetConversionThreshold` option should be increased.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests (including new testcases).
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13887 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16186.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fix the bug when Python UDF is used in explode (generator), GenerateExec requires that all the attributes in expressions should be resolvable from children when creating, we should replace the children first, then replace it's expressions.
```
>>> df.select(explode(f(*df))).show()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 286, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, truncate))
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 933, in __call__
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 63, in deco
return f(*a, **kw)
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 312, in get_return_value
py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o52.showString.
: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: makeCopy, tree:
Generate explode(<lambda>(_1#0L)), false, false, [col#15L]
+- Scan ExistingRDD[_1#0L]
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.makeCopy(TreeNode.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:45)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.transformExpressionsDown(QueryPlan.scala:177)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.transformExpressions(QueryPlan.scala:144)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$python$ExtractPythonUDFs$$extract(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:153)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:114)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:113)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:301)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:301)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:300)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$4.apply(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$4.apply(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$5.apply(TreeNode.scala:321)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformChildren(TreeNode.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.apply(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:113)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.apply(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:93)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$prepareForExecution$1.apply(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$prepareForExecution$1.apply(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized$class.foldLeft(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:124)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foldLeft(List.scala:84)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.prepareForExecution(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.executedPlan$lzycompute(QueryExecution.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.executedPlan(QueryExecution.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.withTypedCallback(Dataset.scala:2557)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.head(Dataset.scala:1923)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.take(Dataset.scala:2138)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.showString(Dataset.scala:239)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at py4j.reflection.MethodInvoker.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:237)
at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.invoke(ReflectionEngine.java:357)
at py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:280)
at py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:128)
at py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
at py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:211)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:423)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(TreeNode.scala:413)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(TreeNode.scala:413)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:412)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:49)
... 42 more
Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: pythonUDF0#20
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$3.apply(TreeNode.scala:279)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$3.apply(TreeNode.scala:279)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:278)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$5.apply(TreeNode.scala:321)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformChildren(TreeNode.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transform(TreeNode.scala:268)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$.bindReference(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.GenerateExec.<init>(GenerateExec.scala:63)
... 52 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Couldn't find pythonUDF0#20 in [_1#0L]
at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:94)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:49)
... 67 more
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13883 from davies/udf_in_generate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a small patch to rewrite the predicate filter translation in DataSourceStrategy. The original code used excessive functional constructs (e.g. unzip) and was very difficult to understand.
## How was this patch tested?
Should be covered by existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#13889 from rxin/simplify-predicate-filter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the case that we don't know which module a object came from, will call pickle.whichmodule() to go throught all the loaded modules to find the object, which could fail because some modules, for example, six, see https://bitbucket.org/gutworth/six/issues/63/importing-six-breaks-pickling
We should ignore the exception here, use `__main__` as the module name (it means we can't find the module).
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tested. Can't have a unit test for this.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13788 from davies/whichmodule.
## The problem
Before this change, if either of the following cases happened to a task , the task would be marked as `FAILED` instead of `KILLED`:
- the task was killed before it was deserialized
- `executor.kill()` marked `taskRunner.killed`, but before calling `task.killed()` the worker thread threw the `TaskKilledException`
The reason is, in the `catch` block of the current [Executor.TaskRunner](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala#L362)'s implementation, we are mistakenly catching:
```scala
case _: TaskKilledException | _: InterruptedException if task.killed => ...
```
the semantics of which is:
- **(**`TaskKilledException` **OR** `InterruptedException`**)** **AND** `task.killed`
Then when `TaskKilledException` is thrown but `task.killed` is not marked, we would mark the task as `FAILED` (which should really be `KILLED`).
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch alters the catch condition's semantics from:
- **(**`TaskKilledException` **OR** `InterruptedException`**)** **AND** `task.killed`
to
- `TaskKilledException` **OR** **(**`InterruptedException` **AND** `task.killed`**)**
so that we can catch `TaskKilledException` correctly and mark the task as `KILLED` correctly.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test which failed before the change, ran new test 1000 times manually
Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>
Closes#13685 from lw-lin/fix-task-killed.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Made changes to HashingTF,QuantileVectorizer and CountVectorizer
Author: GayathriMurali <gayathri.m@intel.com>
Closes#13745 from GayathriMurali/SPARK-15997.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace use of `commons-lang` in favor of `commons-lang3` and forbid the former via scalastyle; remove `NotImplementedException` from `comons-lang` in favor of JDK `UnsupportedOperationException`
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#13843 from srowen/SPARK-16129.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since SPARK-13220(Deprecate "yarn-client" and "yarn-cluster"), YarnClusterSuite doesn't test "yarn cluster" mode correctly.
This pull request fixes it.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Author: peng.zhang <peng.zhang@xiaomi.com>
Closes#13836 from renozhang/SPARK-16125-test-yarn-cluster-mode.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When reading partitions of a partitioned Hive SerDe table, we only initializes the deserializer using partition properties. However, for SerDes like `AvroSerDe`, essential properties (e.g. Avro schema information) may be defined in table properties. We should merge both table properties and partition properties before initializing the deserializer.
Note that an individual partition may have different properties than the one defined in the table properties (e.g. partitions within a table can have different SerDes). Thus, for any property key defined in both partition and table properties, the value set in partition properties wins.
## How was this patch tested?
New test case added in `QueryPartitionSuite`.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#13865 from liancheng/spark-13709-partitioned-avro-table.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
model loading backward compatibility for ml.feature,
## How was this patch tested?
existing ut and manual test for loading 1.6 models.
Author: Yuhao Yang <yuhao.yang@intel.com>
Author: Yuhao Yang <hhbyyh@gmail.com>
Closes#13844 from hhbyyh/featureComp.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16177
model loading backward compatibility for ml.regression
## How was this patch tested?
existing ut and manual test for loading 1.6 models.
Author: Yuhao Yang <hhbyyh@gmail.com>
Closes#13879 from hhbyyh/regreComp.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's weird that `ParserUtils.operationNotAllowed` returns an exception and the caller throw it.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13874 from cloud-fan/style.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes an overflow bug in vectorized parquet reader where both off-heap and on-heap variants of `ColumnVector.reserve()` can unfortunately overflow while reserving additional capacity during reads.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual Tests
Author: Sameer Agarwal <sameer@databricks.com>
Closes#13832 from sameeragarwal/negative-array.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `readBatches` accumulator of `InMemoryTableScanExec` is updated only when `spark.sql.inMemoryColumnarStorage.partitionPruning` is true. Although this metric is used for only testing purpose, we had better have correct metric without considering SQL options.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests (including a new testcase).
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13870 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16165.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `CombineFilters` to compose the final predicate condition by using (`child predicate` AND `parent predicate`) instead of (`parent predicate` AND `child predicate`). This is a best effort approach. Some other optimization rules may destroy this order by reorganizing conjunctive predicates.
**Reported Error Scenario**
Chris McCubbin reported a bug when he used StringIndexer in an ML pipeline with additional filters. It seems that during filter pushdown, we changed the ordering in the logical plan.
```scala
import org.apache.spark.ml.feature._
val df1 = (0 until 3).map(_.toString).toDF
val indexer = new StringIndexer()
.setInputCol("value")
.setOutputCol("idx")
.setHandleInvalid("skip")
.fit(df1)
val df2 = (0 until 5).map(_.toString).toDF
val predictions = indexer.transform(df2)
predictions.show() // this is okay
predictions.where('idx > 2).show() // this will throw an exception
```
Please see the notebook at https://databricks-prod-cloudfront.cloud.databricks.com/public/4027ec902e239c93eaaa8714f173bcfc/1233855/2159162931615821/588180/latest.html for error messages.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests (including a new testcase).
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13872 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16164.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This changes the behavior of --num-executors and spark.executor.instances when using dynamic allocation. Instead of turning dynamic allocation off, it uses the value for the initial number of executors.
This changes was discussed on [SPARK-13723](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13723). I highly recommend using it while we can change the behavior for 2.0.0. In practice, the 1.x behavior causes unexpected behavior for users (it is not clear that it disables dynamic allocation) and wastes cluster resources because users rarely notice the log message.
## How was this patch tested?
This patch updates tests and adds a test for Utils.getDynamicAllocationInitialExecutors.
Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Closes#13338 from rdblue/SPARK-13723-num-executors-with-dynamic-allocation.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update `ApplicationMaster` to sleep for at least the minimum allocation interval before calling `allocateResources`. This prevents overloading the `YarnAllocator` that is happening because the thread is triggered when an executor is killed and its connections die. In YARN, this prevents the app from overloading the allocator and becoming unstable.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested that this allows the an app to recover instead of hanging. It is still possible for the YarnAllocator to be overwhelmed by requests, but this prevents the issue for the most common cause.
Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Closes#13482 from rdblue/SPARK-15725-am-sleep-work-around.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This calculation of statistics is not trivial anymore, it could be very slow on large query (for example, TPC-DS Q64 took several minutes to plan).
During the planning of a query, the statistics of any logical plan should not change (even InMemoryRelation), so we should use `lazy val` to cache the statistics.
For InMemoryRelation, the statistics could be updated after materialization, it's only useful when used in another query (before planning), because once we finished the planning, the statistics will not be used anymore.
## How was this patch tested?
Testsed with TPC-DS Q64, it could be planned in a second after the patch.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13871 from davies/fix_statistics.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16130
model loading backward compatibility for ml.classfication.LogisticRegression
## How was this patch tested?
existing ut and manual test for loading old models.
Author: Yuhao Yang <hhbyyh@gmail.com>
Closes#13841 from hhbyyh/lrcomp.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When the user uses `ConsoleSink`, we should use a temp location if `checkpointLocation` is not specified.
## How was this patch tested?
The added unit test.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#13817 from zsxwing/console-checkpoint.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Updated setJobGroup, cancelJobGroup, clearJobGroup to not require sc/SparkContext as parameter.
Also updated roxygen2 doc and R programming guide on deprecations.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#13838 from felixcheung/rjobgroup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since we decided to switch spark.mllib package into maintenance mode in 2.0, it would be nice to update the package docs to reflect this change.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually checked generated APIs.
Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Closes#13859 from mengxr/SPARK-16154.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding additional check to if statement
## How was this patch tested?
I built and deployed to internal cluster to observe behaviour. After the change the invalid logging is gone:
```
16/06/22 08:46:36 INFO yarn.YarnAllocator: Driver requested a total number of 1 executor(s).
16/06/22 08:46:36 INFO yarn.YarnAllocator: Canceling requests for 1 executor container(s) to have a new desired total 1 executors.
16/06/22 08:46:36 INFO yarn.YarnAllocator: Driver requested a total number of 0 executor(s).
16/06/22 08:47:36 INFO yarn.ApplicationMaster$AMEndpoint: Driver requested to kill executor(s) 1.
```
Author: Peter Ableda <abledapeter@gmail.com>
Closes#13850 from peterableda/patch-2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-14535 removed all calls to class OrcTableScan. This removes the dead code.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: Brian Cho <bcho@fb.com>
Closes#13869 from dafrista/clean-up-orctablescan.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When table is created with column name containing dot, distinct() will fail to run. For example,
```scala
val rowRDD = sparkContext.parallelize(Seq(Row(1), Row(1), Row(2)))
val schema = StructType(Array(StructField("column.with.dot", IntegerType, nullable = false)))
val df = spark.createDataFrame(rowRDD, schema)
```
running the following will have no problem:
```scala
df.select(new Column("`column.with.dot`"))
```
but running the query with additional distinct() will cause exception:
```scala
df.select(new Column("`column.with.dot`")).distinct()
```
The issue is that distinct() will try to resolve the column name, but the column name in the schema does not have backtick with it. So the solution is to add the backtick before passing the column name to resolve().
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test case.
Author: bomeng <bmeng@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13140 from bomeng/SPARK-15230.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We embed partitioning logic in FileSourceStrategy.apply, making the function very long. This is a small refactoring to move it into its own functions. Eventually we would be able to move the partitioning functions into a physical operator, rather than doing it in physical planning.
## How was this patch tested?
This is a simple code move.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#13862 from rxin/SPARK-16159.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to improve test coverage. It verifies whether `Comment` of `Column` can be appropriate handled.
The test cases verify the related parts in Parser, both SQL and DataFrameWriter interface, and both Hive Metastore catalog and In-memory catalog.
#### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13764 from gatorsmile/dataSourceComment.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Extend the returning of unwrapper functions from primitive types to all types.
This PR is based on https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13676. It only fixes a bug with scala-2.10 compilation. All credit should go to dafrista.
## How was this patch tested?
The patch should pass all unit tests. Reading ORC files with non-primitive types with this change reduced the read time by ~15%.
Author: Brian Cho <bcho@fb.com>
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#13854 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15956-scala210.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Initialize logger instance lazily in Scala preferred way
## How was this patch tested?
By running `./build/mvn clean test` locally
Author: Prajwal Tuladhar <praj@infynyxx.com>
Closes#13842 from infynyxx/spark_internal_logger.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In 1.4 and earlier releases, we have package grouping in the generated Java API docs. See http://spark.apache.org/docs/1.4.0/api/java/index.html. However, this disappeared in 1.5.0: http://spark.apache.org/docs/1.5.0/api/java/index.html.
Rather than fixing it, I'd suggest removing grouping. Because it might take some time to fix and it is a manual process to update the grouping in `SparkBuild.scala`. I didn't find anyone complaining about missing groups since 1.5.0 on Google.
Manually checked the generated Java API docs and confirmed that they are the same as in master.
Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Closes#13856 from mengxr/SPARK-16155.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We recently deprecated setLabelCol in ChiSqSelectorModel (#13823):
~~~scala
/** group setParam */
Since("1.6.0")
deprecated("labelCol is not used by ChiSqSelectorModel.", "2.0.0")
def setLabelCol(value: String): this.type = set(labelCol, value)
~~~
This unfortunately hit a genjavadoc bug and broken doc generation. This is the generated Java code:
~~~java
/** group setParam */
public org.apache.spark.ml.feature.ChiSqSelectorModel setOutputCol (java.lang.String value) { throw new RuntimeException(); }
*
* deprecated labelCol is not used by ChiSqSelectorModel. Since 2.0.0.
*/
public org.apache.spark.ml.feature.ChiSqSelectorModel setLabelCol (java.lang.String value) { throw new RuntimeException(); }
~~~
Switching to multiline is a workaround.
Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Closes#13855 from mengxr/SPARK-16153.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, we use local timezone to parse or format a timestamp (TimestampType), then use Long as the microseconds since epoch UTC.
In from_utc_timestamp() and to_utc_timestamp(), we did not consider the local timezone, they could return different results with different local timezone.
This PR will do the conversion based on human time (in local timezone), it should return same result in whatever timezone. But because the mapping from absolute timestamp to human time is not exactly one-to-one mapping, it will still return wrong result in some timezone (also in the begging or ending of DST).
This PR is kind of the best effort fix. In long term, we should make the TimestampType be timezone aware to fix this totally.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested these function in all timezone.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13784 from davies/convert_tz.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Guide for
- UDFs with dapply, dapplyCollect
- spark.lapply for running parallel R functions
## How was this patch tested?
build locally
<img width="654" alt="screen shot 2016-06-14 at 03 12 56" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3419881/16039344/12a3b6a0-31de-11e6-8d77-fe23308075c0.png">
Author: Kai Jiang <jiangkai@gmail.com>
Closes#13660 from vectorijk/spark-15672-R-guide-update.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fixes SerializationDebugger to not recurse forever when `writeReplace` returns an object of the same class, which is the case for at least the `SQLMetrics` class.
See also the OpenJDK unit tests on the behavior of recursive `writeReplace()`:
f4d80957e8/test/java/io/Serializable/nestedReplace/NestedReplace.java
cc davies cloud-fan
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests for SerializationDebugger.
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#13814 from ericl/spark-16003.
This reverts commit 0a9c027595. It breaks the 2.10 build, I'll fix this in a different PR.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#13853 from hvanhovell/SPARK-15956-revert.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `ReceiverSuite.scala`, in the test case "write ahead log - generating and cleaning", the inner method `getCurrentLogFiles` uses external variable `logDirectory1` instead of the passed parameter `logDirectory`. This PR fixes this by using the passed method argument instead of variable from the outer scope.
## How was this patch tested?
The unit test was re-run and the output logs were checked for the correct paths used.
tdas
Author: Ahmed Mahran <ahmed.mahran@mashin.io>
Closes#13825 from ahmed-mahran/b-receiver-suite-wal-gen-cln.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`DefaultParamsReadable/Writable` are not user-facing. Only developers who implement `Transformer/Estimator` would use it. So this PR changes the annotation to `DeveloperApi`.
Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Closes#13828 from mengxr/default-readable-should-be-developer-api.