### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Restart the watcher when it failed with a HTTP_GONE code from the kubernetes api. Which means a resource version has changed.
For more relevant information see here: https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/issues/1075
### Why are the changes needed?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Running spark-submit to a k8s cluster.
Not sure how to make an automated test for this. If someone can help me out that would be great.
Closes#28423 from stijndehaes/bugfix/k8s-submit-resource-version-change.
Authored-by: Stijn De Haes <stijndehaes@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Correct the spelling of parameter 'spark.executor.instances' in KubernetesTestComponents
### Why are the changes needed?
Parameter spelling error
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Test is not needed.
Closes#29164 from merrily01/SPARK-32367.
Authored-by: maruilei <maruilei@jd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What is changed?
This pull request adds the ability to migrate shuffle files during Spark's decommissioning. The design document associated with this change is at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xVO1b6KAwdUhjEJBolVPl9C6sLj7oOveErwDSYdT-pE .
To allow this change the `MapOutputTracker` has been extended to allow the location of shuffle files to be updated with `updateMapOutput`. When a shuffle block is put, a block update message will be sent which triggers the `updateMapOutput`.
Instead of rejecting remote puts of shuffle blocks `BlockManager` delegates the storage of shuffle blocks to it's shufflemanager's resolver (if supported). A new, experimental, trait is added for shuffle resolvers to indicate they handle remote putting of blocks.
The existing block migration code is moved out into a separate file, and a producer/consumer model is introduced for migrating shuffle files from the host as quickly as possible while not overwhelming other executors.
### Why are the changes needed?
Recomputting shuffle blocks can be expensive, we should take advantage of our decommissioning time to migrate these blocks.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
This PR introduces two new configs parameters, `spark.storage.decommission.shuffleBlocks.enabled` & `spark.storage.decommission.rddBlocks.enabled` that control which blocks should be migrated during storage decommissioning.
### How was this patch tested?
New unit test & expansion of the Spark on K8s decom test to assert that decommisioning with shuffle block migration means that the results are not recomputed even when the original executor is terminated.
This PR is a cleaned-up version of the previous WIP PR I made https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28331 (thanks to attilapiros for his very helpful reviewing on it :)).
Closes#28708 from holdenk/SPARK-20629-copy-shuffle-data-when-nodes-are-being-shutdown-cleaned-up.
Lead-authored-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Holden Karau <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
Co-authored-by: “attilapiros” <piros.attila.zsolt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Attila Zsolt Piros <attilazsoltpiros@apiros-mbp16.lan>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
See again the related PRs like https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28971
This completes fixing compilation for 2.13 for all but `repl`, which is a separate task.
### Why are the changes needed?
Eventually, we need to support a Scala 2.13 build, perhaps in Spark 3.1.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests. (2.13 was not tested; this is about getting it to compile without breaking 2.12)
Closes#29147 from srowen/SPARK-29292.4.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to remove Python 2 test case from K8s IT.
### Why are the changes needed?
Since Apache Spark 3.1.0 dropped Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 support officially via SPARK-32138, K8s IT fails.
```
KubernetesSuite:
- Run SparkPi with no resources
- Run SparkPi with a very long application name.
- Use SparkLauncher.NO_RESOURCE
- Run SparkPi with a master URL without a scheme.
- Run SparkPi with an argument.
- Run SparkPi with custom labels, annotations, and environment variables.
- All pods have the same service account by default
- Run extraJVMOptions check on driver
- Run SparkRemoteFileTest using a remote data file
- Run SparkPi with env and mount secrets.
- Run PySpark on simple pi.py example
- Run PySpark with Python2 to test a pyfiles example *** FAILED ***
The code passed to eventually never returned normally. Attempted 113 times over 2.0014854648999996 minutes. Last failure message: false was not true. (KubernetesSuite.scala:370)
- Run PySpark with Python3 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with memory customization
- Run in client mode.
- Start pod creation from template
- PVs with local storage
- Launcher client dependencies
- Test basic decommissioning
- Run SparkR on simple dataframe.R example
Run completed in 11 minutes, 15 seconds.
Total number of tests run: 20
Suites: completed 2, aborted 0
Tests: succeeded 19, failed 1, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
*** 1 TEST FAILED ***
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins K8s IT.
Closes#29136 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-32335.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR will remove references to these "blacklist" and "whitelist" terms besides the blacklisting feature as a whole, which can be handled in a separate JIRA/PR.
This touches quite a few files, but the changes are straightforward (variable/method/etc. name changes) and most quite self-contained.
### Why are the changes needed?
As per discussion on the Spark dev list, it will be beneficial to remove references to problematic language that can alienate potential community members. One such reference is "blacklist" and "whitelist". While it seems to me that there is some valid debate as to whether these terms have racist origins, the cultural connotations are inescapable in today's world.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
In the test file `HiveQueryFileTest`, a developer has the ability to specify the system property `spark.hive.whitelist` to specify a list of Hive query files that should be tested. This system property has been renamed to `spark.hive.includelist`. The old property has been kept for compatibility, but will log a warning if used. I am open to feedback from others on whether keeping a deprecated property here is unnecessary given that this is just for developers running tests.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should be suitable since no behavior changes are expected as a result of this PR.
Closes#28874 from xkrogen/xkrogen-SPARK-32036-rename-blacklists.
Authored-by: Erik Krogen <ekrogen@linkedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to drop Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5.
Roughly speaking, it removes all the widely known Python 2 compatibility workarounds such as `sys.version` comparison, `__future__`. Also, it removes the Python 2 dedicated codes such as `ArrayConstructor` in Spark.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. Unsupport EOL Python versions
2. Reduce maintenance overhead and remove a bit of legacy codes and hacks for Python 2.
3. PyPy2 has a critical bug that causes a flaky test, SPARK-28358 given my testing and investigation.
4. Users can use Python type hints with Pandas UDFs without thinking about Python version
5. Users can leverage one latest cloudpickle, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28950. With Python 3.8+ it can also leverage C pickle.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users cannot use Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 in the upcoming Spark version.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and also tested in Jenkins.
Closes#28957 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-32138.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change replaces the world slave with alternatives matching the context.
### Why are the changes needed?
There is no need to call things slave, we might as well use better clearer names.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the ouput JSON does change. To allow backwards compatibility this is an additive change.
The shell scripts for starting & stopping workers are renamed, and for backwards compatibility old scripts are added to call through to the new ones while printing a deprecation message to stderr.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#28864 from holdenk/SPARK-32004-drop-references-to-slave.
Lead-authored-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Holden Karau <holden@pigscanfly.ca>
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In IPv6 scenario, the current logic to split hostname and port is not correct.
### Why are the changes needed?
to support IPV6 deployment scenario
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
UT and IPV6 spark deployment with yarn
Closes#28931 from PavithraRamachandran/ipv6_issue.
Authored-by: Pavithraramachandran <pavi.rams@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When a Spark Job launched in Cluster mode with Yarn, Application Master sets spark.ui.port port to 0 which means Driver's web UI gets any random port even if we want to explicitly set the Port range for Driver's Web UI
## Why are the changes needed?
We access Spark Web UI via Knox Proxy, and there are firewall restrictions due to which we can not access Spark Web UI since Web UI port range gets random port even if we set explicitly.
This Change will check if there is a specified port range explicitly mentioned so that it does not assign a random port.
## Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
## How was this patch tested?
Local Tested.
Closes#28880 from rajatahujaatinmobi/ahujarajat261/SPARK-32039-change-yarn-webui-port-range-with-property-latest-spark.
Authored-by: Rajat Ahuja <rahuja@twitter.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
According to the dev mailing list discussion, this PR aims to switch the default Apache Hadoop dependency from 2.7.4 to 3.2.0 for Apache Spark 3.1.0 on December 2020.
| Item | Default Hadoop Dependency |
|------|-----------------------------|
| Apache Spark Website | 3.2.0 |
| Apache Download Site | 3.2.0 |
| Apache Snapshot | 3.2.0 |
| Maven Central | 3.2.0 |
| PyPI | 2.7.4 (We will switch later) |
| CRAN | 2.7.4 (We will switch later) |
| Homebrew | 3.2.0 (already) |
In Apache Spark 3.0.0 release, we focused on the other features. This PR targets for [Apache Spark 3.1.0 scheduled on December 2020](https://spark.apache.org/versioning-policy.html).
### Why are the changes needed?
Apache Hadoop 3.2 has many fixes and new cloud-friendly features.
**Reference**
- 2017-08-04: https://hadoop.apache.org/release/2.7.4.html
- 2019-01-16: https://hadoop.apache.org/release/3.2.0.html
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Since the default Hadoop dependency changes, the users will get a better support in a cloud environment.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins.
Closes#28897 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-32058.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To allow alternatives to serviceaccounts
### Why are the changes needed?
Although we provide some authentication configuration, such as spark.kubernetes.authenticate.driver.mounted.oauthTokenFile, spark.kubernetes.authenticate.driver.mounted.caCertFile, etc.
But there is a bug as we forced the service account so when we use one of them, driver still use the KUBERNETES_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN_PATH file, and the error look like bellow:
the KUBERNETES_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN_PATH serviceAccount not exists
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes user can now use `spark.kubernetes.authenticate.driver.mounted.caCertFile`
or token file by `spark.kubernetes.authenticate.driver.mounted.oauthTokenFile`
## How was this patch tested?
Manually passed the certificates using `spark.kubernetes.authenticate.driver.mounted.caCertFile`
or token file by `spark.kubernetes.authenticate.driver.mounted.oauthTokenFile` if there is no default service account available.
Closes#24601 from Udbhav30/serviceaccount.
Authored-by: Udbhav30 <u.agrawal30@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
#31029 # What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In YarnSchedulerBackend, we should avoid using the global execution context for its Future. Otherwise if user's Spark application also uses global execution context for its Future, the user is facing indeterministic behavior in terms of the thread's context class loader.
### Why are the changes needed?
When running tpc-ds test (https://github.com/databricks/spark-sql-perf), occasionally we see error related to class not found:
2020-02-04 20:00:26,673 ERROR yarn.ApplicationMaster: User class threw exception: scala.ScalaReflectionException: class com.databricks.spark.sql.perf.ExperimentRun in JavaMirror with
sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader28ba21f3 of type class sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader with classpath [...]
and parent being sun.misc.Launcher$ExtClassLoader3ff5d147 of type class sun.misc.Launcher$ExtClassLoader with classpath [...]
and parent being primordial classloader with boot classpath [...] not found.
This is the root cause for the problem:
Spark driver starts ApplicationMaster in the main thread, which starts a user thread and set MutableURLClassLoader to that thread's ContextClassLoader.
userClassThread = startUserApplication()
The main thread then setup YarnSchedulerBackend RPC endpoints, which handles these calls using scala Future with the default global ExecutionContext:
doRequestTotalExecutors
doKillExecutors
So for the main thread and user thread, whoever starts the future first get a chance to set ContextClassLoader to the default thread pool:
- If main thread starts a future to handle doKillExecutors() before user thread does then the default thread pool thread's ContextClassLoader would be the default (AppClassLoader).
- If user thread starts a future first then the thread pool thread will have MutableURLClassLoader.
Note that only MutableURLClassLoader can load user provided class for the Spark app, you will see errors related to class not found if the ContextClassLoader is AppClassLoader.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests and manual tests
Closes#27843 from shanyu/shanyu-31029.
Authored-by: Shanyu Zhao <shzhao@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If a Spark distribution has built-in hadoop runtime, Spark will not populate the hadoop classpath from `yarn.application.classpath` and `mapreduce.application.classpath` when a job is submitted to Yarn. Users can override this behavior by setting `spark.yarn.populateHadoopClasspath` to `true`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Without this, Spark will populate the hadoop classpath from `yarn.application.classpath` and `mapreduce.application.classpath` even Spark distribution has built-in hadoop. This results jar conflict and many unexpected behaviors in runtime.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manually test with two builds, with-hadoop and no-hadoop builds.
Closes#28788 from dbtsai/yarn-classpath.
Authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
At the moment, we switch to `https` urls for all the debian mirrors, but turns out some of the mirrors do not support. In this patch, we turn on https mode only for `deb.debian.org` mirror (as it supports SSL).
### Why are the changes needed?
It appears, that security.debian.org does not support https.
```
curl https://security.debian.org
curl: (35) LibreSSL SSL_connect: SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL in connection to security.debian.org:443
```
While building the image, it fails in the following way.
```
MacBook-Pro:spark prashantsharma$ bin/docker-image-tool.sh -r scrapcodes -t v3.1.0-1 build
Sending build context to Docker daemon 222.1MB
Step 1/18 : ARG java_image_tag=8-jre-slim
Step 2/18 : FROM openjdk:${java_image_tag}
---> 381b20190cf7
Step 3/18 : ARG spark_uid=185
---> Using cache
---> 65c06f86753c
Step 4/18 : RUN set -ex && sed -i 's/http:/https:/g' /etc/apt/sources.list && apt-get update && ln -s /lib /lib64 && apt install -y bash tini libc6 libpam-modules krb5-user libnss3 procps && mkdir -p /opt/spark && mkdir -p /opt/spark/examples && mkdir -p /opt/spark/work-dir && touch /opt/spark/RELEASE && rm /bin/sh && ln -sv /bin/bash /bin/sh && echo "auth required pam_wheel.so use_uid" >> /etc/pam.d/su && chgrp root /etc/passwd && chmod ug+rw /etc/passwd && rm -rf /var/cache/apt/*
---> Running in a3461dadd6eb
+ sed -i s/http:/https:/g /etc/apt/sources.list
+ apt-get update
Ign:1 https://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates InRelease
Err:2 https://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates Release
Could not handshake: The TLS connection was non-properly terminated. [IP: 151.101.0.204 443]
Get:3 https://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease [121 kB]
Get:4 https://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease [51.9 kB]
Get:5 https://deb.debian.org/debian buster/main amd64 Packages [7905 kB]
Get:6 https://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates/main amd64 Packages [7868 B]
Reading package lists...
E: The repository 'https://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates Release' does not have a Release file.
The command '/bin/sh -c set -ex && sed -i 's/http:/https:/g' /etc/apt/sources.list && apt-get update && ln -s /lib /lib64 && apt install -y bash tini libc6 libpam-modules krb5-user libnss3 procps && mkdir -p /opt/spark && mkdir -p /opt/spark/examples && mkdir -p /opt/spark/work-dir && touch /opt/spark/RELEASE && rm /bin/sh && ln -sv /bin/bash /bin/sh && echo "auth required pam_wheel.so use_uid" >> /etc/pam.d/su && chgrp root /etc/passwd && chmod ug+rw /etc/passwd && rm -rf /var/cache/apt/*' returned a non-zero code: 100
Failed to build Spark JVM Docker image, please refer to Docker build output for details.
```
So, if we limit the `https` support to only deb.debian.org, does the trick.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manually, by building an image and testing it by running spark shell against it locally using kubernetes.
Closes#28834 from ScrapCodes/spark-31994/debian_mirror_fix.
Authored-by: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use spark-submit to submit a pyspark app on Yarn, and set this in spark-env.sh:
export PYSPARK_ARCHIVES_PATH=local:/opt/spark/python/lib/pyspark.zip,local:/opt/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.7-src.zip
You can see that these local archives are still uploaded to Yarn distributed cache:
yarn.Client: Uploading resource file:/opt/spark/python/lib/pyspark.zip -> hdfs://myhdfs/user/test1/.sparkStaging/application_1581024490249_0001/pyspark.zip
This PR fix this issue by checking the files specified in PYSPARK_ARCHIVES_PATH, if they are local archives, don't distribute to Yarn dist cache.
### Why are the changes needed?
For pyspark appp to support local pyspark archives set in PYSPARK_ARCHIVES_PATH.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests and manual tests.
Closes#27598 from shanyu/shanyu-30845.
Authored-by: Shanyu Zhao <shzhao@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to activate `hadoop-2.7` profile by default in Kubernetes IT module.
### Why are the changes needed?
While SPARK-31881 added Hadoop 3.2 support, one default test dependency was moved to `hadoop-2.7` profile. It works when we give one of `hadoop-2.7` and `hadoop-3.2`, but it fails when we don't give any profile.
**BEFORE**
```
$ mvn test-compile -pl resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests -Pkubernetes-integration-tests
...
[ERROR] [Error] /APACHE/spark-merge/resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/integrationtest/DepsTestsSuite.scala:23:
object amazonaws is not a member of package com
```
**AFTER**
```
$ mvn test-compile -pl resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests -Pkubernetes-integration-tests
..
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
```
The default activated profile will be override when we give `hadoop-3.2`.
```
$ mvn help:active-profiles -Pkubernetes-integration-tests
...
Active Profiles for Project 'org.apache.spark:spark-kubernetes-integration-tests_2.12🫙3.1.0-SNAPSHOT':
The following profiles are active:
- hadoop-2.7 (source: org.apache.spark:spark-kubernetes-integration-tests_2.12:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
- kubernetes-integration-tests (source: org.apache.spark:spark-parent_2.12:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
- test-java-home (source: org.apache.spark:spark-parent_2.12:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
```
```
$ mvn help:active-profiles -Pkubernetes-integration-tests -Phadoop-3.2
...
Active Profiles for Project 'org.apache.spark:spark-kubernetes-integration-tests_2.12🫙3.1.0-SNAPSHOT':
The following profiles are active:
- hadoop-3.2 (source: org.apache.spark:spark-kubernetes-integration-tests_2.12:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
- hadoop-3.2 (source: org.apache.spark:spark-parent_2.12:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
- kubernetes-integration-tests (source: org.apache.spark:spark-parent_2.12:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
- test-java-home (source: org.apache.spark:spark-parent_2.12:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins UT and IT.
Currently, all Jenkins build and tests (UT & IT) passes without this patch. This should be tested manually with the above command.
`hadoop-3.2` K8s IT also passed like the following.
```
KubernetesSuite:
- Run SparkPi with no resources
- Run SparkPi with a very long application name.
- Use SparkLauncher.NO_RESOURCE
- Run SparkPi with a master URL without a scheme.
- Run SparkPi with an argument.
- Run SparkPi with custom labels, annotations, and environment variables.
- All pods have the same service account by default
- Run extraJVMOptions check on driver
- Run SparkRemoteFileTest using a remote data file
- Run SparkPi with env and mount secrets.
- Run PySpark on simple pi.py example
- Run PySpark with Python2 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with Python3 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with memory customization
- Run in client mode.
- Start pod creation from template
- PVs with local storage
- Launcher client dependencies
- Test basic decommissioning
Run completed in 8 minutes, 33 seconds.
Total number of tests run: 19
Suites: completed 2, aborted 0
Tests: succeeded 19, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
All tests passed.
```
Closes#28716 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31881-2.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to support Hadoop 3.2 K8s integration tests.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, K8s integration suite assumes Hadoop 2.7 and has hard-coded parts.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is a dev-only change.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins K8s IT (with Hadoop 2.7) and do the manual testing for Hadoop 3.2 as described in `README.md`.
```
./dev/dev-run-integration-tests.sh --hadoop-profile hadoop-3.2
```
I verified this manually like the following.
```
$ resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/dev/dev-run-integration-tests.sh \
--spark-tgz .../spark-3.1.0-SNAPSHOT-bin-3.2.0.tgz \
--exclude-tags r \
--hadoop-profile hadoop-3.2
...
KubernetesSuite:
- Run SparkPi with no resources
- Run SparkPi with a very long application name.
- Use SparkLauncher.NO_RESOURCE
- Run SparkPi with a master URL without a scheme.
- Run SparkPi with an argument.
- Run SparkPi with custom labels, annotations, and environment variables.
- All pods have the same service account by default
- Run extraJVMOptions check on driver
- Run SparkRemoteFileTest using a remote data file
- Run SparkPi with env and mount secrets.
- Run PySpark on simple pi.py example
- Run PySpark with Python2 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with Python3 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with memory customization
- Run in client mode.
- Start pod creation from template
- PVs with local storage
- Launcher client dependencies
- Test basic decommissioning
Run completed in 8 minutes, 49 seconds.
Total number of tests run: 19
Suites: completed 2, aborted 0
Tests: succeeded 19, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
All tests passed.
```
Closes#28689 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31881.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve the check logic on if all node managers are really being backlisted.
### Why are the changes needed?
I observed when the AM is out of sync with ResourceManager, or RM is having issue report back with current number of available NMs, something like below happens:
...
20/05/13 09:01:21 INFO RetryInvocationHandler: java.io.EOFException: End of File Exception between local host is: "client.zyx.com/x.x.x.124"; destination host is: "rm.zyx.com":8030; : java.io.EOFException; For more details see: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/EOFException, while invoking ApplicationMasterProtocolPBClientImpl.allocate over rm543. Trying to failover immediately.
...
20/05/13 09:01:28 WARN AMRMClientImpl: ApplicationMaster is out of sync with ResourceManager, hence resyncing.
...
then the spark job would suddenly run into AllNodeBlacklisted state:
...
20/05/13 09:01:31 INFO ApplicationMaster: Final app status: FAILED, exitCode: 11, (reason: Due to executor failures all available nodes are blacklisted)
...
but actually there's no black listed nodes in currentBlacklistedYarnNodes, and I do not see any blacklisting message from:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker.scala#L119
We should only return isAllNodeBlacklisted =true when we see there are >0 numClusterNodes AND 'currentBlacklistedYarnNodes.size >= numClusterNodes'.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
A minor change. No changes on tests.
Closes#28606 from cnZach/false_AllNodeBlacklisted_when_RM_is_having_issue.
Authored-by: Yuexin Zhang <zach.yx.zhang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to upgrade `kubernetes-client` library to bring the JDK8 related fixes. Please note that JDK11 works fine without any problem.
- https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/releases/tag/v4.9.2
- JDK8 always uses http/1.1 protocol (Prevent OkHttp from wrongly enabling http/2)
### Why are the changes needed?
OkHttp "wrongly" detects the Platform as Jdk9Platform on JDK 8u251.
- https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/issues/2212
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61565751/why-am-i-not-able-to-run-sparkpi-example-on-a-kubernetes-k8s-cluster
Although there is a workaround `export HTTP2_DISABLE=true` and `Downgrade JDK or K8s`, we had better avoid this problematic situation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This will recover the failures on JDK 8u252.
### How was this patch tested?
- [x] Pass the Jenkins UT (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28601#issuecomment-632474270)
- [x] Pass the Jenkins K8S IT with the K8s 1.13 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28601#issuecomment-632438452)
- [x] Manual testing with K8s 1.17.3. (Below)
**v1.17.6 result (on Minikube)**
```
KubernetesSuite:
- Run SparkPi with no resources
- Run SparkPi with a very long application name.
- Use SparkLauncher.NO_RESOURCE
- Run SparkPi with a master URL without a scheme.
- Run SparkPi with an argument.
- Run SparkPi with custom labels, annotations, and environment variables.
- All pods have the same service account by default
- Run extraJVMOptions check on driver
- Run SparkRemoteFileTest using a remote data file
- Run SparkPi with env and mount secrets.
- Run PySpark on simple pi.py example
- Run PySpark with Python2 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with Python3 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with memory customization
- Run in client mode.
- Start pod creation from template
- PVs with local storage
- Launcher client dependencies
- Test basic decommissioning
Run completed in 8 minutes, 27 seconds.
Total number of tests run: 19
Suites: completed 2, aborted 0
Tests: succeeded 19, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
All tests passed.
```
Closes#28601 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-K8S-CLIENT.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds UI updates to support stage level scheduling and ResourceProfiles. 3 main things have been added. ResourceProfile id added to the Stage page, the Executors page now has an optional selectable column to show the ResourceProfile Id of each executor, and the Environment page now has a section with the ResourceProfile ids. Along with this the rest api for environment page was updated to include the Resource profile information.
I debating on splitting the resource profile information into its own page but I wasn't sure it called for a completely separate page. Open to peoples thoughts on this.
Screen shots:
### Why are the changes needed?
For user to be able to know what resource profile was used with which stage and executors. The resource profile information is also available so user debugging can see exactly what resources were requested with that profile.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, UI updates.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests and tested on yarn both active applications and with the history server.
Closes#28094 from tgravescs/SPARK-29303-pr.
Lead-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to skip R image building and one R test during integration tests by using `--exclude-tags r`.
### Why are the changes needed?
We have only one R integration test case, `Run SparkR on simple dataframe.R example`, for submission test coverage. Since this is rarely changed, we can skip this and save the efforts required for building the whole R image and running the single test.
```
KubernetesSuite:
...
- Run SparkR on simple dataframe.R example
Run completed in 10 minutes, 20 seconds.
Total number of tests run: 20
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the K8S integration test and do the following manually. (Note that R test is skipped)
```
$ resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/dev/dev-run-integration-tests.sh --deploy-mode docker-for-desktop --exclude-tags r --spark-tgz $PWD/spark-*.tgz
...
KubernetesSuite:
- Run SparkPi with no resources
- Run SparkPi with a very long application name.
- Use SparkLauncher.NO_RESOURCE
- Run SparkPi with a master URL without a scheme.
- Run SparkPi with an argument.
- Run SparkPi with custom labels, annotations, and environment variables.
- All pods have the same service account by default
- Run extraJVMOptions check on driver
- Run SparkRemoteFileTest using a remote data file
- Run SparkPi with env and mount secrets.
- Run PySpark on simple pi.py example
- Run PySpark with Python2 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with Python3 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with memory customization
- Run in client mode.
- Start pod creation from template
- PVs with local storage
- Launcher client dependencies
- Test basic decommissioning
Run completed in 10 minutes, 23 seconds.
Total number of tests run: 19
Suites: completed 2, aborted 0
Tests: succeeded 19, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
All tests passed.
```
Closes#28594 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31780.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to add Spark version prefix during generating test image tag for K8s integration testing.
### Why are the changes needed?
This helps to distinguish the images by version.
**BEFORE**
```
$ docker images | grep kubespark
kubespark/spark-py F7188CBD-AE08-4705-9C8A-D0DD3DC8B86F ...
kubespark/spark F7188CBD-AE08-4705-9C8A-D0DD3DC8B86F ...
```
**AFTER**
```
$ docker images | grep kubespark
kubespark/spark-py 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT_F7188CBD-AE08-4705-9C8A-D0DD3DC8B86F ...
kubespark/spark 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT_F7188CBD-AE08-4705-9C8A-D0DD3DC8B86F ...
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the K8s integration test.
```
...
Successfully tagged kubespark/spark:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT_688b46c8-c119-404d-aadb-d05a14262db7
...
Successfully tagged kubespark/spark-py:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT_688b46c8-c119-404d-aadb-d05a14262db7
...
Successfully tagged kubespark/spark-r:3.1.0-SNAPSHOT_688b46c8-c119-404d-aadb-d05a14262db7
```
Closes#28587 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31766.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to show the actual traceback when "handle large number of containers and tasks (SPARK-18750)" test fails in `LocalityPlacementStrategySuite`.
**It does not fully resolve the JIRA SPARK-31746 yet**. I tried to reproduce in my local by controlling the factors in the tests but I couldn't. I double checked the changes in SPARK-18750 are still valid.
### Why are the changes needed?
This test is flaky for an unknown reason (see https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122768/testReport/org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn/LocalityPlacementStrategySuite/handle_large_number_of_containers_and_tasks__SPARK_18750_/):
```
sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: java.lang.StackOverflowError did not equal null
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:530)
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:529)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.newAssertionFailedException(FunSuite.scala:1560)
at org.scalatest.Assertions$AssertionsHelper.macroAssert(Assertions.scala:503)
```
After this PR, it will help to investigate the root cause:
**Before**:
```
[info] - handle large number of containers and tasks (SPARK-18750) *** FAILED *** (824 milliseconds)
[info] java.lang.StackOverflowError did not equal null (LocalityPlacementStrategySuite.scala:49)
[info] org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException:
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:530)
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:529)
[info] at org.scalatest.FunSuite.newAssertionFailedException(FunSuite.scala:1560)
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions$AssertionsHelper.macroAssert(Assertions.scala:503)
[info] at org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn.LocalityPlacementStrategySuite.$anonfun$new$1(LocalityPlacementStrategySuite.scala:49)
[info] at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:85)
[info] at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:83)
[info] at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:104)
[info] at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:22)
[info] at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:20)
[info] at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(FunSuiteLike.scala:186)
[info] at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.withFixture(SparkFunSuite.scala:157)
[info] at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.invokeWithFixture$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:184)
[info] at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:196)
[info] at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:286)
[info] at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest(FunSuiteLike.scala:196)
[info] at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest$(FunSuiteLike.scala:178)
...
```
**After**:
```
[info] - handle large number of containers and tasks (SPARK-18750) *** FAILED *** (825 milliseconds)
[info] StackOverflowError should not be thrown; however, got:
[info]
[info] java.lang.StackOverflowError
[info] at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$filterImpl$1(TraversableLike.scala:256)
[info] at scala.collection.MapLike$MappedValues.$anonfun$foreach$3(MapLike.scala:256)
[info] at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:877)
[info] at scala.collection.MapLike$MappedValues.$anonfun$foreach$3(MapLike.scala:256)
[info] at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:877)
[info] at scala.collection.MapLike$MappedValues.$anonfun$foreach$3(MapLike.scala:256)
[info] at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:877)
[info] at scala.collection.MapLike$MappedValues.$anonfun$foreach$3(MapLike.scala:256)
[info] at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:877)
[info] at scala.collection.MapLike$MappedValues.$anonfun$foreach$3(MapLike.scala:256)
[info] at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:877)
[info] at scala.collection.MapLike$MappedValues.$anonfun$foreach$3(MapLike.scala:256)
[info] at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:877)
[info] at scala.collection.MapLike$MappedValues.$anonfun$foreach$3(MapLike.scala:256)
[info] at scala.collection.TraversableLike$WithFilter.$anonfun$foreach$1(TraversableLike.scala:877)
[info] at scala.collection.MapLike$MappedValues.$anonfun$foreach$3(MapLike.scala:256)
...
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested by reverting 76db394f2b locally.
Closes#28566 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31746.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
This PR aims to use GitHub URL instead of a broken link in `BasicTestsSuite.scala`.
Currently, K8s integration test is broken:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20K8s%20Builds/job/spark-master-test-k8s/534/console
```
- Run SparkRemoteFileTest using a remote data file *** FAILED ***
The code passed to eventually never returned normally. Attempted 130 times over 2.00109555135 minutes. Last failure message: false was not true. (KubernetesSuite.scala:370)
```
No.
Pass the K8s integration test.
Closes#28561 from williamhyun/williamhyun-patch-1.
Authored-by: williamhyun <62487364+williamhyun@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to recover Hadoop-3.2 profile jobs on `master` branch by disabling a UT added by SPARK-31235 in Hadoop 3.2 temporarily. The target UT is not a flaky test. It always fail on Hadoop-3.2 profile currently although it works in Hadoop 2.7 profile. So, in this PR, we keep the test coverage in Hadoop 2.7 and ignore the test in Hadoop 3.2 temporarily to unblock the other PRs.
### Why are the changes needed?
SPARK-31235 added a test case which is breaking Hadoop 3.2 and there are two follow-up to fix it. Although two follow-ups can fix the UT in Hadoop 3.2 environment. The side-effect on Hadoop classes cause some random UT failures in the other suites.
- https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28456
- https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28550
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with SBT/Maven.
Closes#28552 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31235-2.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to add `spark.kubernetes.driver.service.annotation` like `spark.kubernetes.driver.service.annotation`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Annotations are used in many ways. One example is that Prometheus monitoring system search metric endpoint via annotation.
- https://github.com/helm/charts/tree/master/stable/prometheus#scraping-pod-metrics-via-annotations
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. The documentation is added.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins with the updated unit tests.
Closes#28518 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31696.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch re-obtain tokens at the start of AM for yarn cluster mode, if principal and keytab are available. It basically transfers the credentials from the original user, so this patch puts the new tokens into credentials from the original user via overwriting.
To obtain tokens from providers in user application, this patch leverages the user classloader as context classloader while initializing token manager in the startup of AM.
### Why are the changes needed?
Submitter will obtain delegation tokens for yarn-cluster mode, and add these credentials to the launch context. AM will be launched with these credentials, and AM and driver are able to leverage these tokens.
In Yarn cluster mode, driver is launched in AM, which in turn initializes token manager (while initializing SparkContext) and obtain delegation tokens (+ schedule to renew) if both principal and keytab are available.
That said, even we provide principal and keytab to run application with yarn-cluster mode, AM always starts with initial tokens from launch context until token manager runs and obtains delegation tokens.
So there's a "gap", and if user codes (driver) access to external system with delegation tokens (e.g. HDFS) before initializing SparkContext, it cannot leverage the tokens token manager will obtain. It will make the application fail if AM is killed "after" the initial tokens are expired and relaunched.
This is even a regression: see below codes in branch-2.4:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/branch-2.4/resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scalahttps://github.com/apache/spark/blob/branch-2.4/resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/AMCredentialRenewer.scala
In Spark 2.4.x, AM runs AMCredentialRenewer at initialization, and AMCredentialRenew obtains tokens and merge with credentials being provided with launch context of AM. So it guarantees new tokens in driver run.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested with specifically crafted application (simple reproducer) - https://github.com/HeartSaVioR/spark-delegation-token-experiment/blob/master/src/main/scala/net/heartsavior/spark/example/LongRunningAppWithHDFSConfig.scala
Before this patch, new AM attempt failed when I killed AM after the expiration of tokens. After this patch the new AM attempt runs fine.
Closes#28336 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-31559.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Register `NettyMemoryMetrics` into Node Manager's metrics system through `YarnShuffleServiceMetrics`.
- usedDirectMemory
- usedHeapMemory
### Why are the changes needed?
Such that `NettyMemoryMetrics` can be exposed through Node Manager's JMX.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Update UT to ensure NettyMemoryMetrics are registered into Node Manager's metrics system.
Closes#28416 from manuzhang/spark-31611.
Authored-by: tianlzhang <tianlzhang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update the input parameters for instantiating `RMAppManager` and `ClientRMService`
### Why are the changes needed?
For hadoop3.2, if `RMAppManager` is not created correctly, the following exception will occur:
```
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ReflectionUtils.newInstance(ReflectionUtils.java:135)
at org.apache.hadoop.yarn.security.YarnAuthorizationProvider.getInstance(YarnAuthorizationProvider.java:55)
at org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.RMAppManager.<init>(RMAppManager.java:117)
```
### How was this patch tested?
UTs
Closes#28456 from wang-zhun/Fix-SPARK-31235.
Authored-by: wang-zhun <wangzhun6103@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove unused `registeredConnections` counter from `ExternalBlockHandler#ShuffleMetrics`
This was added by SPARK-25642 at 3.0.0
- 8dd29fe36b
### Why are the changes needed?
It's `registeredConnections` counter created in `TransportContext` that's really counting the numbers and it's misleading for people who want to add new metrics like `registeredConnections`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Add UTs to ensure all expected metrics are registered for `ExternalShuffleService` and `YarnShuffleService`
Closes#28457 from manuzhang/spark-31611-pre.
Lead-authored-by: tianlzhang <tianlzhang@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `spark.yarn.applicationType` to identify the application type
### Why are the changes needed?
The current application defaults to the SPARK type.
In fact, different types of applications have different characteristics and are suitable for different scenarios.For example: SPAKR-SQL, SPARK-STREAMING.
I recommend distinguishing them by the parameter `spark.yarn.applicationType` so that we can more easily manage and maintain different types of applications.
### How was this patch tested?
1.add UT
2.Tested by verifying Yarn-UI `ApplicationType` in the following cases:
- client and cluster mode
Need additional explanation:
limit cannot exceed 20 characters, can be empty or space
The reasons are as follows:
```
// org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.submitApplication.
if (submissionContext.getApplicationType() == null) {
submissionContext
.setApplicationType(YarnConfiguration.DEFAULT_APPLICATION_TYPE);
} else {
// APPLICATION_TYPE_LENGTH = 20
if (submissionContext.getApplicationType().length() > YarnConfiguration.APPLICATION_TYPE_LENGTH) {
submissionContext.setApplicationType(submissionContext
.getApplicationType().substring(0,
YarnConfiguration.APPLICATION_TYPE_LENGTH));
}
}
```
Closes#28009 from wang-zhun/SPARK-31235.
Authored-by: wang-zhun <wangzhun6103@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix `spark.kubernetes.executor.podNamePrefix` to work.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, the configuration is broken like the following.
```
bin/spark-submit \
--master k8s://$K8S_MASTER \
--deploy-mode cluster \
--name spark-pi \
--class org.apache.spark.examples.SparkPi \
-c spark.kubernetes.container.image=spark:pr \
-c spark.kubernetes.driver.pod.name=mypod \
-c spark.kubernetes.executor.podNamePrefix=mypod \
local:///opt/spark/examples/jars/spark-examples_2.12-3.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
```
**BEFORE SPARK-31601**
```
pod/mypod 1/1 Running 0 9s
pod/spark-pi-7469dd71c499fafb-exec-1 1/1 Running 0 4s
pod/spark-pi-7469dd71c499fafb-exec-2 1/1 Running 0 4s
```
**AFTER SPARK-31601**
```
pod/mypod 1/1 Running 0 8s
pod/mypod-exec-1 1/1 Running 0 3s
pod/mypod-exec-2 1/1 Running 0 3s
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. This is a bug fix. The conf will work as described in the documentation.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins and run the above comment manually.
Closes#28401 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31601.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We are adding a new Spark Yarn configuration, `spark.yarn.populateHadoopClasspath` to not populate Hadoop classpath from `yarn.application.classpath` and `mapreduce.application.classpath`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark Yarn client populates extra Hadoop classpath from `yarn.application.classpath` and `mapreduce.application.classpath` when a job is submitted to a Yarn Hadoop cluster.
However, for `with-hadoop` Spark build that embeds Hadoop runtime, it can cause jar conflicts because Spark distribution can contain different version of Hadoop jars.
One case we have is when a user uses an Apache Spark distribution with its-own embedded hadoop, and submits a job to Cloudera or Hortonworks Yarn clusters, because of two different incompatible Hadoop jars in the classpath, it runs into errors.
By not populating the Hadoop classpath from the clusters can address this issue.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
An UT is added, but very hard to add a new integration test since this requires using different incompatible versions of Hadoop.
We also manually tested this PR, and we are able to submit a Spark job using Spark distribution built with Apache Hadoop 2.10 to CDH 5.6 without populating CDH classpath.
Closes#28376 from dbtsai/yarn-classpath.
Authored-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes a typo in deploy/yarn/LocalityPreferredContainerPlacementStrategy.scala file.
### Why are the changes needed?
To deliver correct explanation about how the placement policy works.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
UT as specified, although shouldn't influence any functionality since it's in the comment.
Closes#28267 from asclepiusaka/master.
Authored-by: Cong Du <asclepius1993@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
This issue mainly shows up when you enable dynamic allocation:
because there are many executor state changes (because of executors
being requested and starting to run, and later stopped), the lifecycle
manager class could end up logging information about the same executor
multiple times, since the different events would cause the same
executor update to be present in multiple pod snapshots. On top of that,
it could end up making multiple redundant calls into the API server
for the same pod.
Another issue was when the config was set to not delete executor
pods; with dynamic allocation, that means pods keep accumulating
in the API server, and every time the full sync is done by the
polling source, all executors, even the finished ones that Spark
technically does not care about anymore, would be processed.
The change modifies the lifecycle monitor so that it:
- logs executor updates a single time, even if it shows up in
multiple snapshots, by checking whether the state change
happened before.
- marks finished-but-not-deleted-in-k8s executors with a label
so that they can be easily filtered out.
This reduces the amount of logging done by the lifecycle manager,
which is a minor thing in general since the logs are at debug level.
But it also reduces the amount of data that needs to be fetched
from the API server under certain configurations, and overall
reduces interaction with the API server when dynamic allocation is on.
There's also a change in the snapshot store to ensure that the
same subscriber is not called concurrently. That is kind of a bug,
since it means subscribers could be processing snapshots out of order,
or even that they could block multiple threads (e.g. the allocator
callback was synchronized). I actually ran into the "concurrent calls"
situation in the lifecycle manager during testing, and while it did not
seem to cause problems, it did make for some head scratching while
looking at the logs. It seemed safer to fix that.
Unit tests were updated to check for the changes. Also tested in real
cluster with dynamic allocation on.
Closes#26535 from vanzin/SPARK-29905.
Lead-authored-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR (SPARK-31394) aims to add a new feature that enables mounting of Kubernetes NFS volumes. Most of the codes are just slight modifications from the existing codes for EmptyDir/HostDir/PVC support.
### Why are the changes needed?
Kubernetes supports various kinds of volumes, but Spark for Kubernetes supports only EmptyDir/HostDir/PVC. By adding support for NFS, we can use Spark for Kubernetes with NFS storage.
In order to use NFS with the current Spark using PVC, the user needs to first create an empty new PVC with NFS. Kubernetes' NFS provisioner will create a new empty dir in NFS under some pre-configured dir for this PVC, for example, `/nfs/k8s/sjcho-my-notebook-pvc-dce84888-7a9d-11e6-b1ee-5254001e0c1b`. Then the user should add files to process in the newly created PVC using some file-copying job, and then run the desired Spark job using that populated PVC. And then to get the final results out, the user should run another file-copying job.
This in theory works, but for data analysis tasks, is quite cumbersome. With this change, one could simply use existing files in NFS, say `/nfs/home/sjcho/myfiles10.sstable` from the Spark job directly, and also write the results directly to some existing dir under NFS such as `/nfs/home/sjcho/output`.
This PR doesn't use any features other than the features already provided by Kubernetes itself, so there should be no compatibility issues (other than limited by k8s) between the wide variety of NFS choices. This PR merely enables an existing volume type `nfs` supported officially by Kubernetes, just like Spark is currently supporting `hostPath` and `persistentVolumeClaim` right now.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Users can now mount NFS volumes by running commands like:
```
spark-submit \
--conf spark.kubernetes.driver.volumes.nfs.myshare.mount.path=/myshare \
--conf spark.kubernetes.driver.volumes.nfs.myshare.mount.readOnly=false \
--conf spark.kubernetes.driver.volumes.nfs.myshare.options.server=nfs.example.com \
--conf spark.kubernetes.driver.volumes.nfs.myshare.options.path=/storage/myshare \
...
```
### How was this patch tested?
Test cases were added just like the existing EmptyDir support.
The code were tested using minikube using the following script:
https://gist.github.com/w4-sjcho/4ba48f8c35a9685f5307fbd46b2c0656#file-run-test-sh
The script creates a new minikube cluster, launches an NFS server inside the cluster, copy `README.md` file to the NFS share, and run `JavaWordCount` example against the file located in NFS.
Closes#27364 from w4-sjcho/master.
Authored-by: Seongjin Cho <sjcho@wisefour.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[Delay scheduling](http://elmeleegy.com/khaled/papers/delay_scheduling.pdf) is an optimization that sacrifices fairness for data locality in order to improve cluster and workload throughput.
One useful definition of "delay" here is how much time has passed since the TaskSet was using its fair share of resources.
However it is impractical to calculate this delay, as it would require running simulations assuming no delay scheduling. Tasks would be run in different orders with different run times.
Currently the heuristic used to estimate this delay is the time since a task was last launched for a TaskSet. The problem is that it essentially does not account for resource utilization, potentially leaving the cluster heavily underutilized.
This PR modifies the heuristic in an attempt to move closer to the useful definition of delay above.
The newly proposed delay is the time since a TasksSet last launched a task **and** did not reject any resources due to delay scheduling when offered its "fair share".
See the last comments of #26696 for more discussion.
### Why are the changes needed?
cluster can become heavily underutilized as described in [SPARK-18886](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18886?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20text%20~%20delay)
### How was this patch tested?
TaskSchedulerImplSuite
cloud-fan
tgravescs
squito
Closes#27207 from bmarcott/nmarcott-fulfill-slots-2.
Authored-by: Nicholas Marcott <481161+bmarcott@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to add `m01` as a node name additionally to `PVTestsSuite`.
### Why are the changes needed?
minikube 1.8.0 ~ 1.8.2 generate a cluster with a nodename `m01` while all the other versions have `minikube`. This causes `PVTestSuite` failure.
```
$ minikube --vm-driver=hyperkit start --memory 6000 --cpus 8
* minikube v1.8.2 on Darwin 10.15.3
- MINIKUBE_ACTIVE_DOCKERD=minikube
* Using the hyperkit driver based on user configuration
* Creating hyperkit VM (CPUs=8, Memory=6000MB, Disk=20000MB) ...
* Preparing Kubernetes v1.18.0 on Docker 19.03.6 ...
* Launching Kubernetes ...
* Enabling addons: default-storageclass, storage-provisioner
* Waiting for cluster to come online ...
* Done! kubectl is now configured to use "minikube"
$ kubectl get nodes
NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION
m01 Ready master 22s v1.17.3
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
This only adds a new node name. So, K8S Jenkins job should passed.
In addition, `K8s` integration test suite should be tested on `minikube 1.8.2` manually.
```
KubernetesSuite:
- Run SparkPi with no resources
- Run SparkPi with a very long application name.
- Use SparkLauncher.NO_RESOURCE
- Run SparkPi with a master URL without a scheme.
- Run SparkPi with an argument.
- Run SparkPi with custom labels, annotations, and environment variables.
- All pods have the same service account by default
- Run extraJVMOptions check on driver
- Run SparkRemoteFileTest using a remote data file
- Run SparkPi with env and mount secrets.
- Run PySpark on simple pi.py example
- Run PySpark with Python2 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with Python3 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with memory customization
- Run in client mode.
- Start pod creation from template
- PVs with local storage
- Launcher client dependencies
- Test basic decommissioning
- Run SparkR on simple dataframe.R example
Run completed in 10 minutes, 23 seconds.
Total number of tests run: 20
Suites: completed 2, aborted 0
Tests: succeeded 20, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
All tests passed.
```
For the above test, Minikube 1.8.2 and K8s v1.18.0 is used.
```
$ minikube version
minikube version: v1.8.2
commit: eb13446e786c9ef70cb0a9f85a633194e62396a1
$ kubectl version --short
Client Version: v1.18.0
Server Version: v1.18.0
```
Closes#28080 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31313.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A small change to fix an error in Docker `entrypoint.sh`
### Why are the changes needed?
When spark running on Kubernetes, I got the following logs:
```log
+ '[' -n ']'
+ '[' -z ']'
++ /bin/hadoop classpath
/opt/entrypoint.sh: line 62: /bin/hadoop: No such file or directory
+ export SPARK_DIST_CLASSPATH=
+ SPARK_DIST_CLASSPATH=
```
This is because you are missing some quotes on bash comparisons.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
## How was this patch tested?
CI
Closes#28075 from dungdm93/patch-1.
Authored-by: Đặng Minh Dũng <dungdm93@live.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is the core scheduler changes to support Stage level scheduling.
The main changes here include modification to the DAGScheduler to look at the ResourceProfiles associated with an RDD and have those applied inside the scheduler.
Currently if multiple RDD's in a stage have conflicting ResourceProfiles we throw an error. logic to allow this will happen in SPARK-29153. I added the interfaces to RDD to add and get the REsourceProfile so that I could add unit tests for the scheduler. These are marked as private for now until we finish the feature and will be exposed in SPARK-29150. If you think this is confusing I can remove those and remove the tests and add them back later.
I modified the task scheduler to make sure to only schedule on executor that exactly match the resource profile. It will then check those executors to make sure the current resources meet the task needs before assigning it. In here I changed the way we do the custom resource assignment.
Other changes here include having the cpus per task passed around so that we can properly account for them. Previously we just used the one global config, but now it can change based on the ResourceProfile.
I removed the exceptions that require the cores to be the limiting resource. With this change all the places I found that used executor cores /task cpus as slots has been updated to use the ResourceProfile logic and look to see what resource is limiting.
### Why are the changes needed?
Stage level sheduling feature
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
unit tests and lots of manual testing
Closes#27773 from tgravescs/SPARK-29154.
Lead-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR (SPARK-31244) replaces `Ceph` with `Minio` in K8S `DepsTestSuite`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, `DepsTestsSuite` is using `ceph` for S3 storage. However, the used version and all new releases are broken on new `minikube` releases. We had better use more robust and small one.
```
$ minikube version
minikube version: v1.8.2
$ minikube -p minikube docker-env | source
$ docker run -it --rm -e NETWORK_AUTO_DETECT=4 -e RGW_FRONTEND_PORT=8000 -e SREE_PORT=5001 -e CEPH_DEMO_UID=nano -e CEPH_DAEMON=demo ceph/daemon:v4.0.3-stable-4.0-nautilus-centos-7-x86_64 /bin/sh
2020-03-25 04:26:21 /opt/ceph-container/bin/entrypoint.sh: ERROR- it looks like we have not been able to discover the network settings
$ docker run -it --rm -e NETWORK_AUTO_DETECT=4 -e RGW_FRONTEND_PORT=8000 -e SREE_PORT=5001 -e CEPH_DEMO_UID=nano -e CEPH_DAEMON=demo ceph/daemon:v4.0.11-stable-4.0-nautilus-centos-7 /bin/sh
2020-03-25 04:20:30 /opt/ceph-container/bin/entrypoint.sh: ERROR- it looks like we have not been able to discover the network settings
```
Also, the image size is unnecessarily big (almost `1GB`) and growing while `minio` is `55.8MB` with the same features.
```
$ docker images | grep ceph
ceph/daemon v4.0.3-stable-4.0-nautilus-centos-7-x86_64 a6a05ccdf924 6 months ago 852MB
ceph/daemon v4.0.11-stable-4.0-nautilus-centos-7 87f695550d8e 12 hours ago 901MB
$ docker images | grep minio
minio/minio latest 95c226551ea6 5 days ago 55.8MB
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. (This is a test case change)
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing Jenkins K8s integration test job and test with the latest minikube.
```
$ minikube version
minikube version: v1.8.2
$ kubectl version --short
Client Version: v1.17.4
Server Version: v1.17.4
$ NO_MANUAL=1 ./dev/make-distribution.sh --r --pip --tgz -Pkubernetes
$ resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/dev/dev-run-integration-tests.sh --spark-tgz $PWD/spark-*.tgz
...
KubernetesSuite:
- Run SparkPi with no resources
- Run SparkPi with a very long application name.
- Use SparkLauncher.NO_RESOURCE
- Run SparkPi with a master URL without a scheme.
- Run SparkPi with an argument.
- Run SparkPi with custom labels, annotations, and environment variables.
- All pods have the same service account by default
- Run extraJVMOptions check on driver
- Run SparkRemoteFileTest using a remote data file
- Run SparkPi with env and mount secrets.
- Run PySpark on simple pi.py example
- Run PySpark with Python2 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with Python3 to test a pyfiles example
- Run PySpark with memory customization
- Run in client mode.
- Start pod creation from template
- PVs with local storage *** FAILED *** // This is irrelevant to this PR.
- Launcher client dependencies // This is the fixed test case by this PR.
- Test basic decommissioning
- Run SparkR on simple dataframe.R example
Run completed in 12 minutes, 4 seconds.
...
```
The following is the working snapshot of `DepsTestSuite` test.
```
$ kubectl get all -ncf9438dd8a65436686b1196a6b73000f
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
pod/minio-0 1/1 Running 0 70s
pod/spark-test-app-8494bddca3754390b9e59a2ef47584eb 1/1 Running 0 55s
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
service/minio-s3 NodePort 10.109.54.180 <none> 9000:30678/TCP 70s
service/spark-test-app-fd916b711061c7b8-driver-svc ClusterIP None <none> 7078/TCP,7079/TCP,4040/TCP 55s
NAME READY AGE
statefulset.apps/minio 1/1 70s
```
Closes#28015 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31244.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow up for SPARK-30715 . Kubernetes client version in sync in integration-tests and kubernetes/core
### Why are the changes needed?
More than once, the kubernetes client version has gone out of sync between integration tests and kubernetes/core. So brought them up in sync again and added a comment to save us from future need of this additional followup.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manually.
Closes#27948 from ScrapCodes/follow-up-spark-30715.
Authored-by: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change what we consider a deleted pod to not include "Terminating"
### Why are the changes needed?
If we get a new snapshot while a pod is in the process of being cleaned up we shouldn't delete the executor until it is fully terminated.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
This should be covered by the decommissioning tests in that they currently are flaky because we sometimes delete the executor instead of allowing it to decommission all the way.
I also ran this in a loop locally ~80 times with the only failures being the PV suite because of unrelated minikube mount issues.
Closes#27905 from holdenk/SPARK-31125-Processing-state-snapshots-incorrect.
Authored-by: Holden Karau <hkarau@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the proxy user on the spark-submit command to the childArgs, so the proxy user can be retrieved and used in the KubernetesAplication to add the proxy user in the driver container args
### Why are the changes needed?
The proxy user when used on the spark submit doesn't work on the Kubernetes environment since it doesn't add the `--proxy-user` argument on the driver container and when I added it manually to the Pod definition it worked just fine.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Tests were added
Closes#27422 from PedroRossi/SPARK-25355.
Authored-by: Pedro Rossi <pgrr@cin.ufpe.br>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark's Web UI is using an older version of Bootstrap (v. 2.3.2) for the portal pages. Bootstrap 2.x was moved to EOL in Aug 2013 and Bootstrap 3.x was moved to EOL in July 2019 (https://github.com/twbs/release). Older versions of Bootstrap are also getting flagged in security scans for various CVEs:
https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BOOTSTRAP-72889https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BOOTSTRAP-173700https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:bootstrap:20180529https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:bootstrap:20160627
I haven't validated each CVE, but it would be nice to resolve any potential issues and get on a supported release.
The bad news is that there have been quite a few changes between Bootstrap 2 and Bootstrap 4. I've tried updating the library, refactoring/tweaking the CSS and JS to maintain a similar appearance and functionality, and testing the UI for functionality and appearance. This is a fairly large change so I'm sure additional testing and fixes will be needed.
### How was this patch tested?
This has been manually tested, but there is a ton of functionality and there are many pages and detail pages so it is very possible bugs introduced from the upgrade were missed. Additional testing and feedback is welcomed. If it appears a whole page was missed let me know and I'll take a pass at addressing that page/section.
Closes#27370 from clarkead/bootstrap4-core-upgrade.
Authored-by: Dale Clarke <a.dale.clarke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Stijn De Haes
maruilei
Holden Karau
Sean Owen
Dongjoon Hyun
Erik Krogen
HyukjinKwon
Pavithraramachandran
Rajat Ahuja
Udbhav30
Shanyu Zhao
DB Tsai
Prashant Sharma
Yuexin Zhang
Thomas Graves
William Hyun
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
tianlzhang
wang-zhun
Cong Du
Marcelo Vanzin
Seongjin Cho
Nicholas Marcott
Đặng Minh Dũng
Pedro Rossi
Dale Clarke
beliefer
