### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This a followup of the recent work such as https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33200
For `ALTER TABLE` commands, the logical plans do not have the common `AlterTable` prefix in the name and just use names like `SetTableLocation`. This PR proposes to follow the same naming rule in `ALTER TABE ... COLUMN` commands.
This PR also moves these AlterTable commands to a individual file and give them a base trait.
### Why are the changes needed?
name simplification
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
existing test
Closes#33609 from cloud-fan/dsv2.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7cb9c1c241)
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
This PR proposes to fail properly so JSON parser can proceed and parse the input with the permissive mode.
Previously, we passed `null`s as are, the root `InternalRow`s became `null`s, and it causes the query fails even with permissive mode on.
Now, we fail explicitly if `null` is passed when the input array contains `null`.
Note that this is consistent with non-array JSON input:
**Permissive mode:**
```scala
spark.read.json(Seq("""{"a": "str"}""", """null""").toDS).collect()
```
```
res0: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([str], [null])
```
**Failfast mode**:
```scala
spark.read.option("mode", "failfast").json(Seq("""{"a": "str"}""", """null""").toDS).collect()
```
```
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Malformed records are detected in record parsing. Parse Mode: FAILFAST. To process malformed records as null result, try setting the option 'mode' as 'PERMISSIVE'.
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.FailureSafeParser.parse(FailureSafeParser.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameReader.$anonfun$json$7(DataFrameReader.scala:540)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.nextCur(Iterator.scala:484)
```
To make the permissive mode to proceed and parse without throwing an exception.
**Permissive mode:**
```scala
spark.read.json(Seq("""[{"a": "str"}, null]""").toDS).collect()
```
Before:
```
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:759)
```
After:
```
res0: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([null])
```
NOTE that this behaviour is consistent when JSON object is malformed:
```scala
spark.read.schema("a int").json(Seq("""[{"a": 123}, {123123}, {"a": 123}]""").toDS).collect()
```
```
res0: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([null])
```
Since we're parsing _one_ JSON array, related records all fail together.
**Failfast mode:**
```scala
spark.read.option("mode", "failfast").json(Seq("""[{"a": "str"}, null]""").toDS).collect()
```
Before:
```
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:759)
```
After:
```
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Malformed records are detected in record parsing. Parse Mode: FAILFAST. To process malformed records as null result, try setting the option 'mode' as 'PERMISSIVE'.
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.FailureSafeParser.parse(FailureSafeParser.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameReader.$anonfun$json$7(DataFrameReader.scala:540)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.nextCur(Iterator.scala:484)
```
Manually tested, and unit test was added.
Closes#33608 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36379.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0bbcbc6508)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For added UT, without this patch will failed as below
```
[info] - SHOW TABLES V2: SPARK-36086: CollapseProject project replace alias should use origin column name *** FAILED *** (4 seconds, 935 milliseconds)
[info] java.lang.RuntimeException: After applying rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer.CollapseProject in batch Operator Optimization before Inferring Filters, the structural integrity of the plan is broken.
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.errors.QueryExecutionErrors$.structuralIntegrityIsBrokenAfterApplyingRuleError(QueryExecutionErrors.scala:1217)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.RuleExecutor.$anonfun$execute$2(RuleExecutor.scala:229)
[info] at scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized.foldLeft(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:126)
[info] at scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized.foldLeft$(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:122)
[info] at scala.collection.immutable.List.foldLeft(List.scala:91)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.RuleExecutor.$anonfun$execute$1(RuleExecutor.scala:208)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.RuleExecutor.$anonfun$execute$1$adapted(RuleExecutor.scala:200)
[info] at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:431)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.RuleExecutor.execute(RuleExecutor.scala:200)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.RuleExecutor.$anonfun$executeAndTrack$1(RuleExecutor.scala:179)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.QueryPlanningTracker$.withTracker(QueryPlanningTracker.scala:88)
```
CollapseProject project replace alias should use origin column name
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix bug
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT
Closes#33576 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-36086.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit f3173956cb)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change the `NullType.simpleString` to "void" to set "void" as the formal type name of `NullType`
### Why are the changes needed?
This PR is intended to address the type name discussion in PR #28833. Here are the reasons:
1. The type name of NullType is displayed everywhere, e.g. schema string, error message, document. Hence it's not possible to hide it from users, we have to choose a proper name
2. The "void" is widely used as the type name of "NULL", e.g. Hive, pgSQL
3. Changing to "void" can enable the round trip of `toDDL`/`fromDDL` for NullType. (i.e. make `from_json(col, schema.toDDL)`) work
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the type name of "NULL" is changed from "null" to "void". for example:
```
scala> sql("select null as a, 1 as b").schema.catalogString
res5: String = struct<a:void,b:int>
```
### How was this patch tested?
existing test cases
Closes#33437 from linhongliu-db/SPARK-36224-void-type-name.
Authored-by: Linhong Liu <linhong.liu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2f700773c2)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, v2 ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMNS does not check duplicates for the user specified columns. For example,
```
spark.sql(s"CREATE TABLE $t (id int) USING $v2Format")
spark.sql("ALTER TABLE $t ADD COLUMNS (data string, data string)")
```
doesn't fail the analysis, and it's up to the catalog implementation to handle it. For v1 command, the duplication is checked before invoking the catalog.
### Why are the changes needed?
To check the duplicate columns during analysis and be consistent with v1 command.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now the above will command will print out the fllowing:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Found duplicate column(s) in the user specified columns: `data`
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests
Closes#33600 from imback82/alter_add_duplicate_columns.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3b713e7f61)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Changes in this PR:
- `AdaptiveSparkPlanExec` has new methods `finalPlanSupportsColumnar` and `doExecuteColumnar` to support adaptive queries where the final query stage produces columnar data.
- `SessionState` now has a new set of injectable rules named `finalQueryStagePrepRules` that can be applied to the final query stage.
- `AdaptiveSparkPlanExec` can now safely be wrapped by either `RowToColumnarExec` or `ColumnarToRowExec`.
A Spark plugin can use the new rules to remove the root `ColumnarToRowExec` transition that is inserted by previous rules and at execution time can call `finalPlanSupportsColumnar` to see if the final query stage is columnar. If the plan is columnar then the plugin can safely call `doExecuteColumnar`. The adaptive plan can be wrapped in either `RowToColumnarExec` or `ColumnarToRowExec` to force a particular output format. There are fast paths in both of these operators to avoid any redundant transitions.
### Why are the changes needed?
Without this change it is necessary to use reflection to get the final physical plan to determine whether it is columnar and to execute it is a columnar plan. `AdaptiveSparkPlanExec` only provides public methods for row-based execution.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
I have manually tested this patch with the RAPIDS Accelerator for Apache Spark.
Closes#33140 from andygrove/support-columnar-adaptive.
Authored-by: Andy Grove <andygrove73@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0f538402fb)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to implement `distributed-sequence` index in Scala side.
### Why are the changes needed?
- Avoid unnecessary (de)serialization
- Keep the nullability in the input DataFrame when `distributed-sequence` is enabled. During the serialization, all fields are being nullable for now (see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32775#discussion_r645882104)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No to end users since pandas API on Spark is not released yet.
```python
import pyspark.pandas as ps
ps.set_option('compute.default_index_type', 'distributed-sequence')
ps.range(1).spark.print_schema()
```
Before:
```
root
|-- id: long (nullable = true)
```
After:
```
root
|-- id: long (nullable = false)
```
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested, and existing tests should cover them.
Closes#33570 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36338.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit c6140d4d0a)
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33352 , to simplify the JDBC aggregate pushdown:
1. We should get the schema of the aggregate query by asking the JDBC server, instead of calculating it by ourselves. This can simplify the code a lot, and is also more robust: the data type of SUM may vary in different databases, it's fragile to assume they are always the same as Spark.
2. because of 1, now we can remove the `dataType` property from the public `Sum` expression.
This PR also contains some small improvements:
1. Spark should deduplicate the aggregate expressions before pushing them down.
2. Improve the `toString` of public aggregate expressions to make them more SQL.
### Why are the changes needed?
code and API simplification
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
this API is not released yet.
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#33579 from cloud-fan/dsv2.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 387a251a68)
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since we have add log about commit time, I think this useful and we can make user know it directly in SQL tab's UI.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make user can directly know commit duration.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
User can see file commit duration in SQL tab's SQL plan graph
### How was this patch tested?
Mannul tested
Closes#33553 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-34399-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move both `PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite` and `PrunePartitionSuiteBase` to the package `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources`. Did a few refactoring to enable this.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently both `PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite` and `PrunePartitionSuiteBase` are in package `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution` which doesn't look correct as these tests are not specific to Hive. Therefore, it's better to move them into `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources`, the same place where the rule `PruneFileSourcePartitions` is at.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, it's just test refactoring.
### How was this patch tested?
Using existing tests:
```
build/sbt "sql/testOnly *PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite"
```
and
```
build/sbt "hive/testOnly *PruneHiveTablePartitionsSuite"
```
Closes#33564 from sunchao/SPARK-36136-partitions-suite.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0ece865ea4)
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As the discussion in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32928/files#r654049392, after confirming the compatibility, we can use a newer RocksDB version for the state store implementation.
### Why are the changes needed?
For further ARM support and leverage the bug fix for the newer version.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#33578 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-36347.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <yuanjian.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4cd5fa96d8)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to support ANSI interval literals for `TimeWindow`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Watermark also supports ANSI interval literals so it's great to support for `TimeWindow`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New test.
Closes#33551 from sarutak/window-interval.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit db18866742)
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow up of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33447, where the unit test is disabled, due to failure after memory setting changed. I found the root cause is after https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33447, in unit test, Spark memory page byte size is changed from `67108864` to `33554432` [1]. So the shuffled hash join build size is also changed accordingly due to [memory page byte size change](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelation.scala#L457). Previously the unit test is checking the exact value of build size, so it no longer works. Here we change the unit test to verify the relative value of build size, and it should work.
[1]: I printed out the memory page byte size explicitly in unit test - `org.apache.spark.SparkException: chengsu pageSizeBytes: 33554432!` in https://github.com/c21/spark/runs/3186680616?check_suite_focus=true .
### Why are the changes needed?
Make previously disabled unit test work.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Changed unit test itself.
Closes#33494 from c21/test.
Authored-by: Cheng Su <chengsu@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6a8dd3229a)
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Proposing adding new metrics to `customMetrics` under the `stateOperators` in `StreamingQueryProgress` event These metrics help have better visibility into the RocksDB based state store in streaming jobs. For full details of metrics, refer to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36236.
### Why are the changes needed?
Current metrics available for the RockDB state store, do not provide observability into many operations such as how much time is spent by the RocksDB in compaction and what is the cache hit ratio. These metrics help compare performance differences in state store operations between slow and fast microbatches .
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unittests
Closes#33455 from vkorukanti/rocksdb-metrics.
Authored-by: Venki Korukanti <venki.korukanti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit eb4d1c0332)
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1/ conv() have inconsistency in behavior where the returned value is different above the 64 char threshold.
```
scala> spark.sql("select conv(repeat('?', 64), 10, 16)").show
+---------------------------+
|conv(repeat(?, 64), 10, 16)|
+---------------------------+
| 0|
+---------------------------+
scala> spark.sql("select conv(repeat('?', 65), 10, 16)").show // which should be 0
+---------------------------+
|conv(repeat(?, 65), 10, 16)|
+---------------------------+
| FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF|
+---------------------------+
scala> spark.sql("select conv(repeat('?', 65), 10, -16)").show // which should be 0
+----------------------------+
|conv(repeat(?, 65), 10, -16)|
+----------------------------+
| -1|
+----------------------------+
scala> spark.sql("select conv(repeat('?', 64), 10, -16)").show
+----------------------------+
|conv(repeat(?, 64), 10, -16)|
+----------------------------+
| 0|
+----------------------------+
```
2/ conv should return result equal to max unsigned long value in base toBase when there is overflow
```
scala> spark.sql(select conv('aaaaaaa0aaaaaaa0a', 16, 10)).show // which should be 18446744073709551615
+-------------------------------+
|conv(aaaaaaa0aaaaaaa0a, 16, 10)|
+-------------------------------+
| 12297828695278266890|
+-------------------------------+
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Bug fix, this pull request aim to make conv function behave similarly with the behavior of conv function from MySQL database
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
change in result of conv() function
### How was this patch tested?
add test
Closes#33459 from dgd-contributor/SPARK-36229_convInconsistencyBehaviorWithMoreThan64Characters.
Authored-by: dgd-contributor <dgd_contributor@viettel.com.vn>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit e1c50ff779)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add back ParquetSchemaConverter.checkFieldNames()
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix code
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Closes#33552 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-36312-FOLLOWUP.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit f086c17b8e)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Unify schema check code of FileFormat and check avro schema filed name when CREATE TABLE DDL too
### Why are the changes needed?
Refactor code
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Not need
Closes#33441 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-36202.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 86f44578e5)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to migrate the following `ALTER TABLE ... ADD/REPLACE COLUMNS` commands to use `UnresolvedTable` as a `child` to resolve the table identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a part of effort to make the relation lookup behavior consistent: [SPARK-29900](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
After this PR, the above `ALTER TABLE ... ADD/REPLACE COLUMNS` commands will have a consistent resolution behavior.
### How was this patch tested?
Updated existing tests.
Closes#33200 from imback82/alter_add_cols.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 809b88a162)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Last pr only support add inner field check for hive ddl, this pr add check for parquet data source write API.
### Why are the changes needed?
Failed earlier
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added Ut
Without this UI it failed as
```
[info] - SPARK-36312: ParquetWriteSupport should check inner field *** FAILED *** (8 seconds, 29 milliseconds)
[info] Expected exception org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException to be thrown, but org.apache.spark.SparkException was thrown (HiveDDLSuite.scala:3035)
[info] org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException:
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:472)
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:471)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.newAssertionFailedException(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions.intercept(Assertions.scala:756)
[info] at org.scalatest.Assertions.intercept$(Assertions.scala:746)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.intercept(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.HiveDDLSuite.$anonfun$new$396(HiveDDLSuite.scala:3035)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.HiveDDLSuite.$anonfun$new$396$adapted(HiveDDLSuite.scala:3034)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.SQLHelper.withTempPath(SQLHelper.scala:69)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.SQLHelper.withTempPath$(SQLHelper.scala:66)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.QueryTest.withTempPath(QueryTest.scala:34)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.HiveDDLSuite.$anonfun$new$395(HiveDDLSuite.scala:3034)
[info] at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
[info] at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinally(Utils.scala:1468)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.test.SQLTestUtilsBase.withView(SQLTestUtils.scala:316)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.test.SQLTestUtilsBase.withView$(SQLTestUtils.scala:314)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.HiveDDLSuite.withView(HiveDDLSuite.scala:396)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.HiveDDLSuite.$anonfun$new$394(HiveDDLSuite.scala:3032)
[info] at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
[info] at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:85)
[info] at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:83)
[info] at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:104)
[info] at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:22)
[info] at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:20)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:226)
[info] at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.withFixture(SparkFunSuite.scala:190)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.invokeWithFixture$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:224)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:236)
[info] at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:306)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTest(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:236)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTest$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:218)
[info] at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterEach$$super$runTest(SparkFunSuite.scala:62)
[info] at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterEach.runTest(BeforeAndAfterEach.scala:234)
[info] at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterEach.runTest$(BeforeAndAfterEach.scala:227)
[info] at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.runTest(SparkFunSuite.scala:62)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTests$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:269)
[info] at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:413)
[info] at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:431)
[info] at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:401)
[info] at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsInBranch(Engine.scala:396)
[info] at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestsImpl(Engine.scala:475)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTests(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:269)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.runTests$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:268)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.runTests(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
[info] at org.scalatest.Suite.run(Suite.scala:1112)
[info] at org.scalatest.Suite.run$(Suite.scala:1094)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuite.org$scalatest$funsuite$AnyFunSuiteLike$$super$run(AnyFunSuite.scala:1563)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.$anonfun$run$1(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:273)
[info] at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runImpl(Engine.scala:535)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.run(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:273)
[info] at org.scalatest.funsuite.AnyFunSuiteLike.run$(AnyFunSuiteLike.scala:272)
[info] at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.org$scalatest$BeforeAndAfterAll$$super$run(SparkFunSuite.scala:62)
[info] at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.liftedTree1$1(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:213)
[info] at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:210)
[info] at org.scalatest.BeforeAndAfterAll.run$(BeforeAndAfterAll.scala:208)
[info] at org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite.run(SparkFunSuite.scala:62)
[info] at org.scalatest.tools.Framework.org$scalatest$tools$Framework$$runSuite(Framework.scala:318)
[info] at org.scalatest.tools.Framework$ScalaTestTask.execute(Framework.scala:513)
[info] at sbt.ForkMain$Run.lambda$runTest$1(ForkMain.java:413)
[info] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
[info] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
[info] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
[info] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
[info] Cause: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job aborted.
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.errors.QueryExecutionErrors$.jobAbortedError(QueryExecutionErrors.scala:496)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.write(FileFormatWriter.scala:251)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.run(InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.scala:186)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DataWritingCommandExec.sideEffectResult$lzycompute(commands.scala:113)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DataWritingCommandExec.sideEffectResult(commands.scala:111)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DataWritingCommandExec.executeCollect(commands.scala:125)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$eagerlyExecuteCommands$1.$anonfun$applyOrElse$1(QueryExecution.scala:97)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.$anonfun$withNewExecutionId$5(SQLExecution.scala:103)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withSQLConfPropagated(SQLExecution.scala:163)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.$anonfun$withNewExecutionId$1(SQLExecution.scala:90)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.withActive(SparkSession.scala:775)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withNewExecutionId(SQLExecution.scala:64)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$eagerlyExecuteCommands$1.applyOrElse(QueryExecution.scala:97)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$eagerlyExecuteCommands$1.applyOrElse(QueryExecution.scala:93)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$transformDownWithPruning$1(TreeNode.scala:481)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:82)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDownWithPruning(TreeNode.scala:481)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$plans$logical$AnalysisHelper$$super$transformDownWithPruning(LogicalPlan.scala:30)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.AnalysisHelper.transformDownWithPruning(AnalysisHelper.scala:267)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.AnalysisHelper.transformDownWithPruning$(AnalysisHelper.scala:263)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan.transformDownWithPruning(LogicalPlan.scala:30)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan.transformDownWithPruning(LogicalPlan.scala:30)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:457)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.eagerlyExecuteCommands(QueryExecution.scala:93)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.commandExecuted$lzycompute(QueryExecution.scala:80)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.commandExecuted(QueryExecution.scala:78)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertCommandExecuted(QueryExecution.scala:115)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.runCommand(DataFrameWriter.scala:848)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.saveToV1Source(DataFrameWriter.scala:382)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.saveInternal(DataFrameWriter.scala:355)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.save(DataFrameWriter.scala:239)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.parquet(DataFrameWriter.scala:781)
[in
```
Closes#33531 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-36312.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 59e0c25376)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AQEShuffleReadExec already reports "number of skewed partitions" and "number of skewed partition splits".
It would be useful to also report "number of coalesced partitions" and for ShuffleExchange to report "number of partitions"
This way it's clear what happened on the map side and on the reduce side.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improves usability
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, it now provides more information about `AQEShuffleReadExec` operator behavior in the metrics system.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#32776 from ekoifman/PRISM-91635-customshufflereader-sql-metrics.
Authored-by: Eugene Koifman <eugene.koifman@workday.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 41a16ebf11)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
This PR cherry picks https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33235 to branch-3.2 to fix test failures introduced by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33284.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allows the `Project` node to host outer references in scalar subqueries when `decorrelateInnerQuery` is enabled. It is already supported by the new decorrelation framework and the `RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery` rule.
Note currently by default all correlated subqueries will be decorrelated, which is not necessarily the most optimal approach. Consider `SELECT (SELECT c1) FROM t`. This should be optimized as `SELECT c1 FROM t` instead of rewriting it as a left outer join. This will be done in a separate PR to optimize correlated scalar/lateral subqueries with OneRowRelation.
### Why are the changes needed?
To allow more types of correlated scalar subqueries.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. This PR allows outer query column references in the SELECT cluase of a correlated scalar subquery. For example:
```sql
SELECT (SELECT c1) FROM t;
```
Before this change:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Expressions referencing the outer query are not supported
outside of WHERE/HAVING clauses
```
After this change:
```
+------------------+
|scalarsubquery(c1)|
+------------------+
|0 |
|1 |
+------------------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests and SQL tests.
(cherry picked from commit ca348e50a4)
Signed-off-by: allisonwang-db <allison.wangdatabricks.com>
Closes#33527 from allisonwang-db/spark-36028-3.2.
Authored-by: allisonwang-db <allison.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
update java doc, JDBC data source doc, address follow up comments
### Why are the changes needed?
update doc and address follow up comments
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, add the new JDBC option `pushDownAggregate` in JDBC data source doc.
### How was this patch tested?
manually checked
Closes#33526 from huaxingao/aggPD_followup.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxin_gao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit c8dd97d456)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Previously we blocked creating tables with the null column to follow the hive behavior in PR #28833
In this PR, I propose the restore the previous behavior to support the null column in a table.
### Why are the changes needed?
For a complex query, it's possible to generate a column with null type. If this happens to the input query of
CTAS, the query will fail due to Spark doesn't allow creating a table with null type. From the user's perspective,
it’s hard to figure out why the null type column is produced in the complicated query and how to fix it. So removing
this constraint is more friendly to users.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, this reverts the previous behavior change in #28833, for example, below command will success after this PR
```sql
CREATE TABLE t (col_1 void, col_2 int)
```
### How was this patch tested?
newly added and existing test cases
Closes#33488 from linhongliu-db/SPARK-36241-support-void-column.
Authored-by: Linhong Liu <linhong.liu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8e7e14dc0d)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We added the char/varchar support in 3.1, but the string length check is only applied to INSERT, not UPDATE/MERGE. This PR fixes it. This PR also adds the missing type coercion for UPDATE/MERGE.
### Why are the changes needed?
complete the char/varchar support and make UPDATE/MERGE easier to use by doing type coercion.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
new UT. No built-in source support UPDATE/MERGE so end-to-end test is not applicable here.
Closes#33468 from cloud-fan/char.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 068f8d434a)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move both `PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite` and `PrunePartitionSuiteBase` to the package `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources`. Did a few refactoring to enable this.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently both `PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite` and `PrunePartitionSuiteBase` are in package `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution` which doesn't look correct as these tests are not specific to Hive. Therefore, it's better to move them into `org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources`, the same place where the rule `PruneFileSourcePartitions` is at.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, it's just test refactoring.
### How was this patch tested?
Using existing tests:
```
build/sbt "sql/testOnly *PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite"
```
and
```
build/sbt "hive/testOnly *PruneHiveTablePartitionsSuite"
```
Closes#33350 from sunchao/SPARK-36136-partitions-suite.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 634f96dde4)
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to rename:
- Rename `*Reader`/`*reader` to `*Read`/`*read` for rules and execution plan (user-facing doc/config name remain untouched)
- `*ShuffleReaderExec` ->`*ShuffleReadExec`
- `isLocalReader` -> `isLocalRead`
- ...
- Rename `CustomShuffle*` prefix to `AQEShuffle*`
- Rename `OptimizeLocalShuffleReader` rule to `OptimizeShuffleWithLocalRead`
### Why are the changes needed?
There are multiple problems in the current naming:
- `CustomShuffle*` -> `AQEShuffle*`
it sounds like it is a pluggable API. However, this is actually only used by AQE.
- `OptimizeLocalShuffleReader` -> `OptimizeShuffleWithLocalRead`
it is the name of a rule but it can be misread as a reader, which is counterintuative
- `*ReaderExec` -> `*ReadExec`
Reader execution reads a bit odd. It should better be read execution (like `ScanExec`, `ProjectExec` and `FilterExec`). I can't find the reason to name it with something that performs an action. See also the generated plans:
Before:
```
...
* HashAggregate (12)
+- CustomShuffleReader (11)
+- ShuffleQueryStage (10)
+- Exchange (9)
...
```
After:
```
...
* HashAggregate (12)
+- AQEShuffleRead (11)
+- ShuffleQueryStage (10)
+- Exchange (9)
..
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, internal refactoring.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing unittests should cover the changes.
Closes#33429 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36217.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6e3d404cec)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Group exception about data format schema of different format, orc/parquet
### Why are the changes needed?
group exception
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Not need
Closes#33296 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-34402.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit a63802f2c6)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added another partition spec to allow OptimizeLocalShuffleReader rule to read data from multiple mappers if the parallelism is less than the number of mappers.
### Why are the changes needed?
Optimization to the OptimizeLocalShuffleReader rule
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#33310 from michaelzhang-db/supportDataFromMultipleMappers.
Authored-by: michaelzhang-db <michael.zhang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 094ae3708f)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add interfaces and APIs to push down Aggregates to V2 Data Source
### Why are the changes needed?
improve performance
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
SQLConf.PARQUET_AGGREGATE_PUSHDOWN_ENABLED was added. If this is set to true, Aggregates are pushed down to Data Source.
### How was this patch tested?
New tests were added to test aggregates push down in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32049. The original PR is split into two PRs. This PR doesn't contain new tests.
Closes#33352 from huaxingao/aggPushDownInterface.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxin_gao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit c561ee6865)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Trying to adjust build memory settings and serial execution to re-enable GA.
### Why are the changes needed?
GA tests are failed recently due to return code 137. We need to adjust build settings to make GA work.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev only.
### How was this patch tested?
GA
Closes#33447 from viirya/test-ga.
Lead-authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit fd36ed4550)
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As we decided to release TimestampNTZ type in Spark 3.3, we should update the versions of TimestampNTZ related changes as 3.3.0.
### Why are the changes needed?
Correct the versions in documentation/code comment.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT
Closes#33480 from gengliangwang/updateVersion3.2.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR extends the way to represent `delayThreshold` with ANSI interval literals for watermark.
### Why are the changes needed?
A `delayThreshold` is semantically an interval value so it's should be represented as ANSI interval literals as well as the conventional `1 second` form.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New tests.
Closes#33456 from sarutak/delayThreshold-interval.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 07fa38e2c1)
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds optimization for scalar and lateral subqueries with OneRowRelation as leaf nodes. It inlines such subqueries before decorrelation to avoid rewriting them as left outer joins. It also introduces a flag to turn on/off this optimization: `spark.sql.optimizer.optimizeOneRowRelationSubquery` (default: True).
For example:
```sql
select (select c1) from t
```
Analyzed plan:
```
Project [scalar-subquery#17 [c1#18] AS scalarsubquery(c1)#22]
: +- Project [outer(c1#18)]
: +- OneRowRelation
+- LocalRelation [c1#18, c2#19]
```
Optimized plan before this PR:
```
Project [c1#18#25 AS scalarsubquery(c1)#22]
+- Join LeftOuter, (c1#24 <=> c1#18)
:- LocalRelation [c1#18]
+- Aggregate [c1#18], [c1#18 AS c1#18#25, c1#18 AS c1#24]
+- LocalRelation [c1#18]
```
Optimized plan after this PR:
```
LocalRelation [scalarsubquery(c1)#22]
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To optimize query plans.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests.
Closes#33284 from allisonwang-db/spark-36063-optimize-subquery-one-row-relation.
Authored-by: allisonwang-db <allison.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit de8e4be92c)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `BaseScriptTransformationExec` for `SparkScriptTransformationExec` to support ANSI interval types.
### Why are the changes needed?
`SparkScriptTransformationExec` support `CalendarIntervalType` so it's better to support ANSI interval types as well.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New test.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutakoss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekkgmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f56c7b71ff)
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekkgmail.com>
Closes#33463 from MaxGekk/sarutak_script-transformation-interval-3.2.
Authored-by: Kousuke Saruta <sarutak@oss.nttdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove TimestampNTZ type support in the production code of Spark 3.2.
To archive the goal, this PR adds the check "Utils.isTesting" in the following code branches:
- keyword "timestamp_ntz" and "timestamp_ltz" in parser
- New expressions from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35662
- Using java.time.localDateTime as the external type for TimestampNTZType
- `SQLConf.timestampType` which determines the default timestamp type of Spark SQL.
This is to minimize the code difference between the master branch. So that future users won't think TimestampNTZ is already available in Spark 3.2.
The downside is that users can still find TimestampNTZType under package `org.apache.spark.sql.types`. There should be nothing left other than this.
### Why are the changes needed?
As of now, there are some blockers for delivering the TimestampNTZ project in Spark 3.2:
- In the Hive Thrift server, both TimestampType and TimestampNTZType are mapped to the same timestamp type, which can cause confusion for users.
- For the Parquet data source, the new written TimestampNTZType Parquet columns will be read as TimestampType in old Spark releases. Also, we need to decide the merge schema for files mixed with TimestampType and TimestampNTZ type.
- The type coercion rules for TimestampNTZType are incomplete. For example, what should the data type of the in clause "IN(Timestamp'2020-01-01 00:00:00', TimestampNtz'2020-01-01 00:00:00') be.
- It is tricky to support TimestampNTZType in JSON/CSV data readers. We need to avoid regressions as possible as we can.
There are 10 days left for the expected 3.2 RC date. So, I propose to **release the TimestampNTZ type in Spark 3.3 instead of Spark 3.2**. So that we have enough time to make considerate designs for the issues.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing Unit tests + manual tests from spark-shell to validate the changes are gone.
New functions
```
spark.sql("select to_timestamp_ntz'2021-01-01 00:00:00'").show()
spark.sql("select to_timestamp_ltz'2021-01-01 00:00:00'").show()
spark.sql("select make_timestamp_ntz(1,1,1,1,1,1)").show()
spark.sql("select make_timestamp_ltz(1,1,1,1,1,1)").show()
spark.sql("select localtimestamp()").show()
```
The SQL configuration `spark.sql.timestampType` should not work in 3.2
```
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.timestampType", "TIMESTAMP_NTZ")
spark.sql("select make_timestamp(1,1,1,1,1,1)").schema
spark.sql("select to_timestamp('2021-01-01 00:00:00')").schema
spark.sql("select timestamp'2021-01-01 00:00:00'").schema
Seq((1, java.sql.Timestamp.valueOf("2021-01-01 00:00:00"))).toDF("i", "ts").write.partitionBy("ts").parquet("/tmp/test")
spark.read.parquet("/tmp/test").schema
```
LocalDateTime is not supported as a built-in external type:
```
Seq(LocalDateTime.now()).toDF()
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Literal(java.time.LocalDateTime.now())
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Literal(0L, TimestampNTZType)
```
Closes#33444 from gengliangwang/banNTZ.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fixes a case sensitivity issue for desc table commands with partition specified.
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
yes, but it's a bugfix
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
#### before
```
+-- !query
+DESC EXTENDED t PARTITION (C='Us', D=1)
+-- !query schema
+struct<>
+-- !query output
+org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException
+Partition spec is invalid. The spec (C, D) must match the partition spec (c, d) defined in table '`default`.`t`'
+
```
#### after
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33424/files#diff-554189c49950974a948f99fa9b7436f615052511660c6a0ae3062fa8ca0a327cR328Closes#33424 from yaooqinn/SPARK-36213.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4cd6cfc773)
Signed-off-by: Kent Yao <yao@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Sometimes, AQE skew join optimization can fail with NPE. This is because AQE tries to get the shuffle block sizes, but some map outputs are missing due to the executor lost or something.
This PR fixes this bug by skipping skew join handling if some map outputs are missing in the `MapOutputTracker`.
### Why are the changes needed?
bug fix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
a new UT
Closes#33445 from cloud-fan/bug.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9c8a3d3975)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33222 .
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33222 made a mistake that, `RemoveRedundantProjects` may lose the `LOGICAL_PLAN_TAG` tag, even though the logical plan link is retained. This was actually caught by the test `LogicalPlanTagInSparkPlanSuite`, but was not being taken care of.
There is no problem so far, but losing information can always lead to potential bugs.
### Why are the changes needed?
fix a mistake
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
existing test
Closes#33442 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 94aece4325)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding support for accepting an initial state with flatMapGroupsWithState in batch mode.
### Why are the changes needed?
SPARK-35897 added support for accepting an initial state for streaming queries using flatMapGroupsWithState. the code flow is separate for batch and streaming and required a different PR.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes as discussed above flatMapGroupsWithState in batch mode can accept an initialState, previously this would throw an UnsupportedOperationException
### How was this patch tested?
Added relevant unit tests in FlatMapGroupsWithStateSuite and modified the tests `JavaDatasetSuite`
Closes#33336 from rahulsmahadev/flatMapGroupsWithStateBatch.
Authored-by: Rahul Mahadev <rahul.mahadev@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit efcce23b91)
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removes `FileFormatDataWriterMetricSuite` which duplicated.
### Why are the changes needed?
`FileFormatDataWriterMetricSuite` should be renamed to `InMemoryTableMetricSuite`. But it was wrongly copied.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#33454 from viirya/SPARK-36030-followup-3.2.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoid using procedure syntax deprecated in Scala 2.13.
https://github.com/apache/spark/runs/3120481756?check_suite_focus=true
```
[error] /home/runner/work/spark/spark/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatDataWriterMetricSuite.scala:44:90: procedure syntax is deprecated: instead, add `: Unit =` to explicitly declare `testMetricOnDSv2`'s return type
[error] private def testMetricOnDSv2(func: String => Unit, checker: Map[Long, String] => Unit) {
[error] ^
[error] /home/runner/work/spark/spark/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InMemoryTableMetricSuite.scala:44:90: procedure syntax is deprecated: instead, add `: Unit =` to explicitly declare `testMetricOnDSv2`'s return type
[error] private def testMetricOnDSv2(func: String => Unit, checker: Map[Long, String] => Unit) {
[error] ^
[warn] 100 warnings found
[error] two errors found
[error] (sql / Test / compileIncremental) Compilation failed
[error] Total time: 579 s (09:39), completed Jul 21, 2021 4:14:26 AM
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To make the build compatible with Scala 2.13 in Spark.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, dev-only.
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested:
```bash
./dev/change-scala-version.sh 2.13
./build/mvn -DskipTests -Phive-2.3 -Phive clean package -Pscala-2.13
```
Closes#33452 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-36030.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 99006e515b)
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We add the interface for DS v2 metrics in SPARK-34366. It is only added for reading path, though. This patch extends the metrics interface to writing path.
### Why are the changes needed?
Complete DS v2 metrics interface support in writing path.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. For developer, yes, as this adds metrics support at DS v2 writing path.
### How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Closes#33239 from viirya/v2-write-metrics.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2653201b0a)
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Preserve the insertion order of columns in Dataset.withColumns
### Why are the changes needed?
It is the expected behavior. We preserve insertion order in all other places.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. Currently Dataset.withColumns is not actually used anywhere to insert more than one column. This change is to make sure it behaves as expected when it is used for that purpose in future.
### How was this patch tested?
Added test in DatasetSuite
Closes#33423 from koertkuipers/feat-withcolumns-preserve-order.
Authored-by: Koert Kuipers <koert@tresata.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit bf680bf25a)
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Forces the selectivity estimate for null-based filters to be in the range `[0,1]`.
### Why are the changes needed?
I noticed in a few TPC-DS query tests that the column statistic null count can be higher than the table statistic row count. In the current implementation, the selectivity estimate for `IsNotNull` is negative.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#33286 from karenfeng/bound-selectivity-est.
Authored-by: Karen Feng <karen.feng@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit ddc61e62b9)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When inner field have wrong schema filed name should check field name too.
### Why are the changes needed?
Early check early faield
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT
Closes#33409 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-36201.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 251885772d)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Add non-empty partition check in `CustomShuffleReaderExec`
* Make sure `OptimizeLocalShuffleReader` doesn't return empty partition
### Why are the changes needed?
Since SPARK-32083, AQE coalesce always return at least one partition, it should be robust to add non-empty check in `CustomShuffleReaderExec`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
not need
Closes#33431 from ulysses-you/non-empty-partition.
Authored-by: ulysses-you <ulyssesyou18@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit b70c25881c)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current implement of `TimeWindow` only supports `TimestampType`. Spark added a new type `TimestampNTZType`, so we should support `TimestampNTZType` in expression `TimeWindow`.
### Why are the changes needed?
`TimestampNTZType` similar to `TimestampType`, we should support `TimestampNTZType` in expression `TimeWindow`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'Yes'.
`TimeWindow` will accepts `TimestampNTZType`.
### How was this patch tested?
New tests.
Closes#33341 from beliefer/SPARK-36091.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7aa01798c5)
Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
RemoveRedundantAliases may change DataWritingCommand's parameter's attribute name.
In the UT's case before RemoveRedundantAliases the partitionColumns is `CAL_DT`, and change by RemoveRedundantAliases and change to `cal_dt` then case the error case
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix bug
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
For below SQL case
```
sql("create table t1(cal_dt date) using parquet")
sql("insert into t1 values (date'2021-06-27'),(date'2021-06-28'),(date'2021-06-29'),(date'2021-06-30')")
sql("create view t1_v as select * from t1")
sql("CREATE TABLE t2 USING PARQUET PARTITIONED BY (CAL_DT) AS SELECT 1 AS FLAG,CAL_DT FROM t1_v WHERE CAL_DT BETWEEN '2021-06-27' AND '2021-06-28'")
sql("INSERT INTO t2 SELECT 2 AS FLAG,CAL_DT FROM t1_v WHERE CAL_DT BETWEEN '2021-06-29' AND '2021-06-30'")
```
Before this pr
```
sql("SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE CAL_DT BETWEEN '2021-06-29' AND '2021-06-30'").show
+----+------+
|FLAG|CAL_DT|
+----+------+
+----+------+
sql("SELECT * FROM t2 ").show
+----+----------+
|FLAG| CAL_DT|
+----+----------+
| 1|2021-06-27|
| 1|2021-06-28|
+----+----------+
```
After this pr
```
sql("SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE CAL_DT BETWEEN '2021-06-29' AND '2021-06-30'").show
+----+------+
|FLAG|CAL_DT|
+----+------+
| 2|2021-06-29|
| 2|2021-06-30|
+----+------+
sql("SELECT * FROM t2 ").show
+----+----------+
|FLAG| CAL_DT|
+----+----------+
| 1|2021-06-27|
| 1|2021-06-28|
| 2|2021-06-29|
| 2|2021-06-30|
+----+----------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added UT
Closes#33324 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-36093.
Authored-by: Angerszhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 313f3c5460)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
