### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a private `WriteBuilder` mixin trait: `SupportsStreamingUpdate`, so that the builtin v2 streaming sinks can still support the update mode.
Note: it's private because we don't have a proper design yet. I didn't take the proposal in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23702#discussion_r258593059 because we may want something more general, like updating by an expression `key1 = key2 + 10`.
### Why are the changes needed?
In Spark 2.4, all builtin v2 streaming sinks support all streaming output modes, and v2 sinks are enabled by default, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22911
It's too risky for 3.0 to go back to v1 sinks, so I propose to add a private trait to fix builtin v2 sinks, to keep backward compatibility.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now all the builtin v2 streaming sinks support all streaming output modes, which is the same as 2.4
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests.
Closes#28523 from cloud-fan/update.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Eliminate the `UpCast` if it's child data type is already decimal type.
### Why are the changes needed?
While deserializing internal `Decimal` value to external `BigDecimal`(Java/Scala) value, Spark should also respect `Decimal`'s precision and scale, otherwise it will cause precision lost and look weird in some cases, e.g.:
```
sql("select cast(11111111111111111111111111111111111111 as decimal(38, 0)) as d")
.write.mode("overwrite")
.parquet(f.getAbsolutePath)
// can fail
spark.read.parquet(f.getAbsolutePath).as[BigDecimal]
```
```
[info] org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot up cast `d` from decimal(38,0) to decimal(38,18).
[info] The type path of the target object is:
[info] - root class: "scala.math.BigDecimal"
[info] You can either add an explicit cast to the input data or choose a higher precision type of the field in the target object;
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveUpCast$.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$analysis$Analyzer$ResolveUpCast$$fail(Analyzer.scala:3060)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveUpCast$$anonfun$apply$33$$anonfun$applyOrElse$174.applyOrElse(Analyzer.scala:3087)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveUpCast$$anonfun$apply$33$$anonfun$applyOrElse$174.applyOrElse(Analyzer.scala:3071)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$transformDown$1(TreeNode.scala:309)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:72)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:309)
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$transformDown$3(TreeNode.scala:314)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, for cases(cause precision lost) mentioned above will fail before this change but run successfully after this change.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#28572 from Ngone51/fix_encoder.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change timestamp casting to int in ANSI and non-codegen mode, and make the error message consistent to the error messages in the codegen mode. In particular, casting to int is implemented in the same way as casting to short and byte.
### Why are the changes needed?
1. The error message in the non-codegen mode is diversed from the error message in the codegen mode.
2. The error message contains intermediate results that could confuse.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Before the changes, the error message of casting timestamp to int contains intermediate result but after the changes it contains the input values which causes arithmetic overflow.
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suite `AnsiCastSuite`.
Closes#28549 from MaxGekk/fix-error-msg-cast-timestamp.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch effectively reverts SPARK-30098 via below changes:
* Removed the config
* Removed the changes done in parser rule
* Removed the usage of config in tests
* Removed tests which depend on the config
* Rolled back some tests to before SPARK-30098 which were affected by SPARK-30098
* Reflect the change into docs (migration doc, create table syntax)
### Why are the changes needed?
SPARK-30098 brought confusion and frustration on using create table DDL query, and we agreed about the bad effect on the change.
Please go through the [discussion thread](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Resolve-ambiguous-parser-rule-between-two-quot-create-table-quot-s-td29051i20.html) to see the details.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, compared to Spark 2.4.x. End users tried to experiment with Spark 3.0.0 previews will see the change that the behavior is going back to Spark 2.4.x, but I believe we won't guarantee compatibility in preview releases.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Closes#28517 from HeartSaVioR/revert-SPARK-30098.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set default time zone and locale in the default constructor of `SparkFunSuite`:
- Default time zone to `America/Los_Angeles`
- Default locale to `Locale.US`
### Why are the changes needed?
1. To deduplicate code by moving common time zone and locale settings to one place SparkFunSuite
2. To have the same default time zone and locale in all tests. This should prevent errors like https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28538
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
by running all affected test suites
Closes#28548 from MaxGekk/timezone-settings-SparkFunSuite.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Resolve the havingcondition with expanding the GROUPING SETS/CUBE/ROLLUP expressions together in `ResolveGroupingAnalytics`:
- Change the operations resolving directions to top-down.
- Try resolving the condition of the filter as though it is in the aggregate clause by reusing the function in `ResolveAggregateFunctions`
- Push the aggregate expressions into the aggregate which contains the expanded operations.
- Use UnresolvedHaving for all having clause.
### Why are the changes needed?
Correctness bug fix. See the demo and analysis in SPARK-31663.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, correctness bug fix for HAVING with GROUPING SETS.
### How was this patch tested?
New UTs added.
Closes#28501 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-31663.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added tests to check casting timestamps before 1970-01-01 00:00:00Z to ByteType, ShortType, IntegerType and LongType in ansi and non-ansi modes.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage and prevent errors while modifying the CAST expression code.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the modified test suites:
```
$ ./build/sbt "test:testOnly *CastSuite"
```
Closes#28531 from MaxGekk/test-cast-timestamp-to-byte.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR try to fix a bug in `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.ScriptTransformationExec`. This bug appears in our online cluster. `ScriptTransformationExec` should throw an exception, when user uses a python script which contains parse error. But current implementation may miss this case of failure.
### Why are the changes needed?
When user uses a python script which contains a parse error, there will be no output. So `scriptOutputReader.next(scriptOutputWritable) <= 0` matches, then we use `checkFailureAndPropagate()` to check the `proc`. But the `proc` may still be alive and `writerThread.exception` is not defined, `checkFailureAndPropagate` cannot check this case of failure. In the end, the Spark SQL job runs successfully and returns no result. In fact, the SparK SQL job should fails and shows the exception properly.
For example, the error python script is blow.
``` python
# encoding: utf8
import unknow_module
import sys
for line in sys.stdin:
print line
```
The bug can be reproduced by running the following code in our cluter.
```
spark.range(100*100).toDF("index").createOrReplaceTempView("test")
spark.sql("select TRANSFORM(index) USING 'python error_python.py' as new_index from test").collect.foreach(println)
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT
Closes#27724 from slamke/transformation.
Authored-by: sunke.03 <sunke.03@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When reading/writing datetime values that before the rebase switch day, from/to Avro/Parquet files, fail by default and ask users to set a config to explicitly do rebase or not.
### Why are the changes needed?
Rebase or not rebase have different behaviors and we should let users decide it explicitly. In most cases, users won't hit this exception as it only affects ancient datetime values.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, now users will see an error when reading/writing dates before 1582-10-15 or timestamps before 1900-01-01 from/to Parquet/Avro files, with an error message to ask setting a config.
### How was this patch tested?
updated tests
Closes#28477 from cloud-fan/rebase.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Generates java.time.Instant/java.time.LocalDate for DateType/TimestampType by `RandomDataGenerator.forType` when the SQL config `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled` is set to `true`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage, and check java.time.Instant/java.time.LocalDate types in round trip tests.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running modified test suites `RowEncoderSuite`, `RandomDataGeneratorSuite` and `HadoopFsRelationTest`.
Closes#28502 from MaxGekk/random-java8-datetime.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR introduces a change to false for the insideComment flag on a newline. Fixing the issue introduced by SPARK-30049.
### Why are the changes needed?
Previously on SPARK-30049 a comment containing an unclosed quote produced the following issue:
```
spark-sql> SELECT 1 -- someone's comment here
> ;
Error in query:
extraneous input ';' expecting <EOF>(line 2, pos 0)
== SQL ==
SELECT 1 -- someone's comment here
;
^^^
```
This was caused because there was no flag for comment sections inside the splitSemiColon method to ignore quotes. SPARK-30049 added that flag and fixed the issue, but introduced the follwoing problem:
```
spark-sql> select
> 1,
> -- two
> 2;
Error in query:
mismatched input '<EOF>' expecting {'(', 'ADD', 'AFTER', 'ALL', 'ALTER', ...}(line 3, pos 2)
== SQL ==
select
1,
--^^^
```
This issue is generated by a missing turn-off for the insideComment flag with a newline.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- For previous tests using line-continuity(`\`) it was added a line-continuity rule in the SqlBase.g4 file to add the functionality to the SQL context.
- A new test for inline comments was added.
Closes#27920 from javierivanov/SPARK-31102.
Authored-by: Javier Fuentes <j.fuentes.m@icloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some alias of expression can not display correctly in schema. This PR will fix them.
- `TimeWindow`
- `MaxBy`
- `MinBy`
- `UnaryMinus`
- `BitwiseCount`
This PR also fix a typo issue, please look at b7cde42b04/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ExpressionsSchemaSuite.scala (L142)
Note:
1. `MaxBy` and `MinBy` extends `MaxMinBy` and the latter add a method `funcName` not needed. We can reuse `prettyName` to replace `funcName`.
2. Spark SQL exists some function no elegant implementation.For example: `BitwiseCount` override the sql method show below:
`override def sql: String = s"bit_count(${child.sql})"`
I don't think it's elegant enough. Because `Expression` gives the following definitions.
```
def sql: String = {
val childrenSQL = children.map(_.sql).mkString(", ")
s"$prettyName($childrenSQL)"
}
```
By this definition, `BitwiseCount` should override `prettyName` method.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve the implement of some expression.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
'Yes'. This PR will let user see the correct alias in schema.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#28164 from beliefer/elegant-pretty-name-for-function.
Lead-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modified `RandomDataGenerator.forType` for DateType and TimestampType to generate special date//timestamp values with 0.5 probability. This will trigger dictionary encoding in Parquet datasource test HadoopFsRelationTest "test all data types". Currently, dictionary encoding is tested only for numeric types like ShortType.
### Why are the changes needed?
To extend test coverage. Currently, probability of testing of dictionary encoding in the test HadoopFsRelationTest "test all data types" for DateType and TimestampType is close to zero because dates/timestamps are uniformly distributed in wide range, and the chance of generating the same values is pretty low. In this way, parquet datasource cannot apply dictionary encoding for such column types.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running `ParquetHadoopFsRelationSuite` and `JsonHadoopFsRelationSuite`.
Closes#28481 from MaxGekk/test-random-parquet-dict-enc.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Shift non-existing dates in Proleptic Gregorian calendar by 1 day. The reason for that is `RowEncoderSuite` generates random dates/timestamps in the hybrid calendar, and some dates/timestamps don't exist in Proleptic Gregorian calendar like 1000-02-29 because 1000 is not leap year in Proleptic Gregorian calendar.
### Why are the changes needed?
This makes RowEncoderSuite much stable.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running RowEncoderSuite and set non-existing date manually:
```scala
val date = new java.sql.Date(1000 - 1900, 1, 29)
Try { date.toLocalDate; date }.getOrElse(new Date(date.getTime + MILLIS_PER_DAY))
```
Closes#28486 from MaxGekk/fix-RowEncoderSuite.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The RuntimeReplaceable ones are runtime replaceable, thus, their original parameters are not going to be resolved to PrettyAttribute and remain debug style string if we directly implement their `sql` methods with their parameters' `sql` methods.
This PR is raised with suggestions by maropu and cloud-fan https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28402/files#r417656589. In this PR, we re-implement the `sql` methods of the RuntimeReplaceable ones with toPettySQL
### Why are the changes needed?
Consistency of schema output between RuntimeReplaceable expressions and normal ones.
For example, `date_format` vs `to_timestamp`, before this PR, they output differently
#### Before
```sql
select date_format(timestamp '2019-10-06', 'yyyy-MM-dd uuuu')
struct<date_format(TIMESTAMP '2019-10-06 00:00:00', yyyy-MM-dd uuuu):string>
select to_timestamp("2019-10-06S10:11:12.12345", "yyyy-MM-dd'S'HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS")
struct<to_timestamp('2019-10-06S10:11:12.12345', 'yyyy-MM-dd\'S\'HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS'):timestamp>
```
#### After
```sql
select date_format(timestamp '2019-10-06', 'yyyy-MM-dd uuuu')
struct<date_format(TIMESTAMP '2019-10-06 00:00:00', yyyy-MM-dd uuuu):string>
select to_timestamp("2019-10-06T10:11:12'12", "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss''SSSS")
struct<to_timestamp(2019-10-06T10:11:12'12, yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss''SSSS):timestamp>
````
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the schema output style changed for the runtime replaceable expressions as shown in the above example
### How was this patch tested?
regenerate all related tests
Closes#28420 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31615.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup to address the https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28366#discussion_r420611872 by refining the SQL config document.
### Why are the changes needed?
Make developers less confusing.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Only doc change.
Closes#28468 from viirya/SPARK-31365-followup.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to deprecate 'spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly' configuration and remove it in the future release.
### Why are the changes needed?
This optimization can cause a potential correctness issue, see also SPARK-26709.
Also, it seems difficult to extend the optimization. Basically you should whitelist all available functions. It costs some maintenance overhead, see also SPARK-31590.
Looks we should just better let users use `SparkSessionExtensions` instead if they must use, and remove it in Spark side.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, setting `spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly` will show a deprecation warning:
```scala
scala> spark.conf.unset("spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly")
```
```
20/05/06 12:57:23 WARN SQLConf: The SQL config 'spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly' has been
deprecated in Spark v3.0 and may be removed in the future. Avoid to depend on this optimization
to prevent a potential correctness issue. If you must use, use 'SparkSessionExtensions' instead to
inject it as a custom rule.
```
```scala
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly", "true")
```
```
20/05/06 12:57:44 WARN SQLConf: The SQL config 'spark.sql.optimizer.metadataOnly' has been
deprecated in Spark v3.0 and may be removed in the future. Avoid to depend on this optimization
to prevent a potential correctness issue. If you must use, use 'SparkSessionExtensions' instead to
inject it as a custom rule.
```
### How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Closes#28459 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-31647.
Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to replace `NESTED_PREDICATE_PUSHDOWN_ENABLED` with `NESTED_PREDICATE_PUSHDOWN_V1_SOURCE_LIST` which can configure which v1 data sources are enabled with nested predicate pushdown.
### Why are the changes needed?
We added nested predicate pushdown feature that is configured by `NESTED_PREDICATE_PUSHDOWN_ENABLED`. However, this config is all or nothing config, and applies on all data sources.
In order to not introduce API breaking change after enabling nested predicate pushdown, we'd like to set nested predicate pushdown per data sources. Please also refer to the comments https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27728#discussion_r410829720.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added/Modified unit tests.
Closes#28366 from viirya/SPARK-31365.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Perform days rebasing while converting days from JSON string field. In Spark 2.4 and earlier versions, the days are interpreted as days since the epoch in the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian since 1582-10-15). Since Spark 3.0, the base calendar was switched to Proleptic Gregorian calendar, so, the days should be rebased to represent the same local date.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix a bug and restore compatibility with Spark 2.4 in which:
```scala
scala> spark.read.schema("d date").json(Seq("{'d': '-141704'}").toDS).show
+----------+
| d|
+----------+
|1582-01-01|
+----------+
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
Before:
```scala
scala> spark.read.schema("d date").json(Seq("{'d': '-141704'}").toDS).show
+----------+
| d|
+----------+
|1582-01-11|
+----------+
```
After:
```scala
scala> spark.read.schema("d date").json(Seq("{'d': '-141704'}").toDS).show
+----------+
| d|
+----------+
|1582-01-01|
+----------+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Add a test to `JsonSuite`.
Closes#28453 from MaxGekk/json-rebase-legacy-days.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Skip timestamps rebasing after a global threshold when there is no difference between Julian and Gregorian calendars. This allows to avoid checking hash maps of switch points, and fixes perf regressions in `toJavaTimestamp()` and `fromJavaTimestamp()`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fix perf regressions of conversions to/from external type `java.sql.Timestamp`.
Before (see the PR's results https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28440):
```
================================================================================================
Conversion from/to external types
================================================================================================
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 on Linux 4.15.0-1063-aws
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 2.50GHz
To/from Java's date-time: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Timestamp 376 388 10 13.3 75.2 1.1X
Collect java.sql.Timestamp 1878 1937 64 2.7 375.6 0.2X
```
After:
```
================================================================================================
Conversion from/to external types
================================================================================================
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09 on Linux 4.15.0-1063-aws
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 2.50GHz
To/from Java's date-time: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From java.sql.Timestamp 249 264 24 20.1 49.8 1.7X
Collect java.sql.Timestamp 1503 1523 24 3.3 300.5 0.3X
```
Perf improvements in average of:
1. From java.sql.Timestamp is ~ 34%
2. To java.sql.Timestamps is ~16%
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `DateTimeUtilsSuite` and `RebaseDateTimeSuite`.
Closes#28441 from MaxGekk/opt-rebase-common-threshold.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This reverts commit 43a73e387c. It sets `INT96` as the timestamp type while saving timestamps to parquet files.
### Why are the changes needed?
To be compatible with Hive and Presto that don't support the `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` type in current stable releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites.
Closes#28450 from MaxGekk/parquet-int96.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Push the rebase logic to the lower level of the parquet vectorized reader, to make the final code more vectorization-friendly.
### Why are the changes needed?
Parquet vectorized reader is carefully implemented, to make it more likely to be vectorized by the JVM. However, the newly added datetime rebase degrade the performance a lot, as it breaks vectorization, even if the datetime values don't need to rebase (this is very likely as dates before 1582 is rare).
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
Run part of the `DateTimeRebaseBenchmark` locally. The results:
before this patch
```
[info] Load dates from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase off 2677 2838 142 37.4 26.8 1.0X
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase on 3828 4331 805 26.1 38.3 0.7X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase off 2903 2926 34 34.4 29.0 0.9X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase on 4163 4197 38 24.0 41.6 0.6X
[info] Load timestamps from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase off 3537 3627 104 28.3 35.4 1.0X
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase on 6891 7010 105 14.5 68.9 0.5X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase off 3692 3770 72 27.1 36.9 1.0X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase on 7588 7610 30 13.2 75.9 0.5X
```
After this patch
```
[info] Load dates from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase off 2758 2944 197 36.3 27.6 1.0X
[info] after 1582, vec on, rebase on 2908 2966 51 34.4 29.1 0.9X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase off 2840 2878 37 35.2 28.4 1.0X
[info] before 1582, vec on, rebase on 3407 3433 24 29.4 34.1 0.8X
[info] Load timestamps from parquet: Best Time(ms) Avg Time(ms) Stdev(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
[info] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase off 3861 4003 139 25.9 38.6 1.0X
[info] after 1900, vec on, rebase on 4194 4283 77 23.8 41.9 0.9X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase off 3849 3937 79 26.0 38.5 1.0X
[info] before 1900, vec on, rebase on 7512 7546 55 13.3 75.1 0.5X
```
Date type is 30% faster if the values don't need to rebase, 20% faster if need to rebase.
Timestamp type is 60% faster if the values don't need to rebase, no difference if need to rebase.
Closes#28406 from cloud-fan/perf.
Lead-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The collect_set() aggregate function should produce a set of distinct elements. When the column argument's type is BinayType this is not the case.
Example:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
import org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.Window
case class R(id: String, value: String, bytes: Array[Byte])
def makeR(id: String, value: String) = R(id, value, value.getBytes)
val df = Seq(makeR("a", "dog"), makeR("a", "cat"), makeR("a", "cat"), makeR("b", "fish")).toDF()
// In the example below "bytesSet" erroneously has duplicates but "stringSet" does not (as expected).
df.agg(collect_set('value) as "stringSet", collect_set('bytes) as "byteSet").show(truncate=false)
// The same problem is displayed when using window functions.
val win = Window.partitionBy('id).rowsBetween(Window.unboundedPreceding, Window.unboundedFollowing)
val result = df.select(
collect_set('value).over(win) as "stringSet",
collect_set('bytes).over(win) as "bytesSet"
)
.select('stringSet, 'bytesSet, size('stringSet) as "stringSetSize", size('bytesSet) as "bytesSetSize")
.show()
```
We use a HashSet buffer to accumulate the results, the problem is that arrays equality in Scala don't behave as expected, arrays ara just plain java arrays and the equality don't compare the content of the arrays
Array(1, 2, 3) == Array(1, 2, 3) => False
The result is that duplicates are not removed in the hashset
The solution proposed is that in the last stage, when we have all the data in the Hashset buffer, we delete duplicates changing the type of the elements and then transform it to the original type.
This transformation is only applied when we have a BinaryType
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix the bug explained
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. Now `collect_set()` correctly deduplicates array of byte.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit testing
Closes#28351 from planga82/feature/SPARK-31500_COLLECT_SET_bug.
Authored-by: Pablo Langa <soypab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add test cases covering all interval units: MICROSECOND MILLISECOND SECOND MINUTE HOUR DAY WEEK MONTH YEAR
### Why are the changes needed?
For test coverage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Test only.
Closes#28418 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-28424.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to fix two legacy timestamp formatter `LegacySimpleTimestampFormatter` and `LegacyFastTimestampFormatter` to perform micros rebasing in parsing/formatting from/to strings.
### Why are the changes needed?
Legacy timestamps formatters operate on the hybrid calendar (Julian + Gregorian), so, the input micros should be rebased to have the same date-time fields as in Proleptic Gregorian calendar used by Spark SQL, see SPARK-26651.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests to `TimestampFormatterSuite`
Closes#28408 from MaxGekk/fix-rebasing-in-legacy-timestamp-formatter.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `CTESubstitution`, resolve CTE relations first, then traverse the main plan only once to substitute CTE relations.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently we will traverse the main query many times (if there are many CTE relations), which can be pretty slow if the main query is large.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
local perf test
```
scala> :pa
// Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
def test(i: Int): Unit = 1.to(i).foreach { _ =>
spark.sql("""
with
t1 as (select 1),
t2 as (select 1),
t3 as (select 1),
t4 as (select 1),
t5 as (select 1),
t6 as (select 1),
t7 as (select 1),
t8 as (select 1),
t9 as (select 1)
select * from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9""").queryExecution.assertAnalyzed()
}
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
test: (i: Int)Unit
scala> test(10000)
scala> println(org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.RuleExecutor.dumpTimeSpent)
```
The result before this patch
```
Rule Effective Time / Total Time Effective Runs / Total Runs
CTESubstitution 3328796344 / 3924576425 10000 / 20000
```
The result after this patch
```
Rule Effective Time / Total Time Effective Runs / Total Runs
CTESubstitution 1503085936 / 2091992092 10000 / 20000
```
About 2 times faster.
Closes#28407 from cloud-fan/cte.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Because of ebc8fa50d0 and beec8d535f, the SQL output strings for date/timestamp - interval operation will have a malformed format, such as `struct<dateval:date,dateval + (- INTERVAL '2 years 2 months').....`
This PR restore this behavior by adding one `RuntimeReplaceable `implementation for both of the operations to have their pretty SQL strings back.
### Why are the changes needed?
restore the SQL string for datetime operations
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO, we are restoring here
### How was this patch tested?
added unit tests
Closes#28402 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31586-F.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Check all available legacy formats in the tests added by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28345
- Check dates rebasing in legacy parsers for only one direction either days -> string or string -> days.
### Why are the changes needed?
Round trip tests can hide issues in dates rebasing. For example, if we remove rebasing from legacy parsers (from `parse()` and `format()`) the tests will pass.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running `DateFormatterSuite`.
Closes#28398 from MaxGekk/test-rebasing-in-legacy-date-formatter.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to update `sql` in `Rand`/`Randn` with no argument to make a column name deterministic.
Before this PR (a column name changes run-by-run):
```
scala> sql("select rand()").show()
+-------------------------+
|rand(7986133828002692830)|
+-------------------------+
| 0.9524061403696937|
+-------------------------+
```
After this PR (a column name fixed):
```
scala> sql("select rand()").show()
+------------------+
| rand()|
+------------------+
|0.7137935639522275|
+------------------+
// If a seed given, it is still shown in a column name
// (the same with the current behaviour)
scala> sql("select rand(1)").show()
+------------------+
| rand(1)|
+------------------+
|0.6363787615254752|
+------------------+
// We can still check a seed in explain output:
scala> sql("select rand()").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [rand(-2282124938778456838) AS rand()#0]
+- *(1) Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
Note: This fix comes from #28194; the ongoing PR tests the output schema of expressions, so their schemas must be deterministic for the tests.
### Why are the changes needed?
To make output schema deterministic.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Closes#28392 from maropu/SPARK-31594.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses two things:
- `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` should supports view (a regression introduced by #26921)
- `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` on a temporary view should return empty result (2.4 behavior instead of throwing `AnalysisException`.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's a bug.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, now `SHOW TBLPROPERTIES` works on views:
```
scala> sql("CREATE VIEW view TBLPROPERTIES('p1'='v1', 'p2'='v2') AS SELECT 1 AS c1")
scala> sql("SHOW TBLPROPERTIES view").show(truncate=false)
+---------------------------------+-------------+
|key |value |
+---------------------------------+-------------+
|view.catalogAndNamespace.numParts|2 |
|view.query.out.col.0 |c1 |
|view.query.out.numCols |1 |
|p2 |v2 |
|view.catalogAndNamespace.part.0 |spark_catalog|
|p1 |v1 |
|view.catalogAndNamespace.part.1 |default |
+---------------------------------+-------------+
```
And for a temporary view:
```
scala> sql("CREATE TEMPORARY VIEW tview TBLPROPERTIES('p1'='v1', 'p2'='v2') AS SELECT 1 AS c1")
scala> sql("SHOW TBLPROPERTIES tview").show(truncate=false)
+---+-----+
|key|value|
+---+-----+
+---+-----+
```
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#28375 from imback82/show_tblproperties_followup.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With suggestion from cloud-fan https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28222#issuecomment-620586933
I Checked with both Presto and PostgresSQL, one is implemented intervals with ANSI style year-month/day-time, and the other is mixed and Non-ANSI. They both add the exceeded days in interval time part to the total days of the operation which extracts day from interval values.
```sql
presto> SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:00' as timestamp)));
_col0
-------
14
(1 row)
Query 20200428_135239_00000_ahn7x, FINISHED, 1 node
Splits: 17 total, 17 done (100.00%)
0:01 [0 rows, 0B] [0 rows/s, 0B/s]
presto> SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:01' as timestamp)));
_col0
-------
13
(1 row)
Query 20200428_135246_00001_ahn7x, FINISHED, 1 node
Splits: 17 total, 17 done (100.00%)
0:00 [0 rows, 0B] [0 rows/s, 0B/s]
presto>
```
```sql
postgres=# SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:00' as timestamp)));
date_part
-----------
14
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:01' as timestamp)));
date_part
-----------
13
```
```
spark-sql> SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:01' as timestamp)));
0
spark-sql> SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM (cast('2020-01-15 00:00:00' as timestamp) - cast('2020-01-01 00:00:00' as timestamp)));
0
```
In ANSI standard, the day is exact 24 hours, so we don't need to worry about the conceptual day for interval extraction. The meaning of the conceptual day only takes effect when we add it to a zoned timestamp value.
### Why are the changes needed?
Both satisfy the ANSI standard and common use cases in modern SQL platforms
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, it new in 3.0
### How was this patch tested?
add more uts
Closes#28396 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31597.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to simplify the code of `InSet.sql` and create `Literal` instances directly from Catalyst's internal values by using the default `Literal` constructor.
### Why are the changes needed?
This simplifies code and avoids unnecessary conversions to external types.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test `SPARK-31563: sql of InSet for UTF8String collection` in `ColumnExpressionSuite`.
Closes#28399 from MaxGekk/fix-InSet-sql-followup.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The implementation of TimeSub for the operation of timestamp subtracting interval is almost repetitive with TimeAdd. We can replace it with TimeAdd(l, -r) since there are equivalent.
Suggestion from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28310#discussion_r414259239
Besides, the Coercion rules for TimeAdd/TimeSub(date, interval) are useless anymore, so remove them in this PR since they are touched in this PR.
### Why are the changes needed?
remove redundant and useless code for easy maintenance
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, the SQL string of `datetime - interval` become `datetime + (- interval)`
### How was this patch tested?
modified existing unit tests.
Closes#28381 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31586.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a new logical node AggregateWithHaving, and the parser should create this plan for HAVING. The analyzer resolves it to Filter(..., Aggregate(...)).
### Why are the changes needed?
The SQL parser in Spark creates Filter(..., Aggregate(...)) for the HAVING query, and Spark has a special analyzer rule ResolveAggregateFunctions to resolve the aggregate functions and grouping columns in the Filter operator.
It works for simple cases in a very tricky way as it relies on rule execution order:
1. Rule ResolveReferences hits the Aggregate operator and resolves attributes inside aggregate functions, but the function itself is still unresolved as it's an UnresolvedFunction. This stops resolving the Filter operator as the child Aggrege operator is still unresolved.
2. Rule ResolveFunctions resolves UnresolvedFunction. This makes the Aggrege operator resolved.
3. Rule ResolveAggregateFunctions resolves the Filter operator if its child is a resolved Aggregate. This rule can correctly resolve the grouping columns.
In the example query, I put a CAST, which needs to be resolved by rule ResolveTimeZone, which runs after ResolveAggregateFunctions. This breaks step 3 as the Aggregate operator is unresolved at that time. Then the analyzer starts next round and the Filter operator is resolved by ResolveReferences, which wrongly resolves the grouping columns.
See the demo below:
```
SELECT SUM(a) AS b, '2020-01-01' AS fake FROM VALUES (1, 10), (2, 20) AS T(a, b) GROUP BY b HAVING b > 10
```
The query's result is
```
+---+----------+
| b| fake|
+---+----------+
| 2|2020-01-01|
+---+----------+
```
But if we add CAST, it will return an empty result.
```
SELECT SUM(a) AS b, CAST('2020-01-01' AS DATE) AS fake FROM VALUES (1, 10), (2, 20) AS T(a, b) GROUP BY b HAVING b > 10
```
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, bug fix for cast in having aggregate expressions.
### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.
Closes#28294 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-31519.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28318, to make the code more readable, by adding some comments to explain the trick and simplify the code to use a boolean flag instead of 2 string sets.
This PR also fixes various problems:
1. the name check should consider case sensitivity
2. forward name conflicts like `with t as (with t2 as ...), t2 as ...` is not a real conflict and we shouldn't fail.
### Why are the changes needed?
correct the behavior
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, fix the fore-mentioned behaviors.
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#28371 from cloud-fan/followup.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove all the extra whitespaces in the formatted explain.
### Why are the changes needed?
The number of extra whitespaces of the formatted explain becomes different between master and branch-3.0. This causes a problem that whenever we backport formatted explain related tests from master to branch-3.0, it will fail branch-3.0. Besides, extra whitespaces are always disallowed in Spark. Thus, we should remove them as possible as we can.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, formatted explain is newly added in Spark 3.0.
### How was this patch tested?
Updated sql query tests.
Closes#28315 from Ngone51/fix_extra_spaces.
Authored-by: yi.wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To follow ANSI，the expressions - `date + interval`, `interval + date` and `date - interval` should only accept intervals which the `microseconds` part is 0.
### Why are the changes needed?
Better ANSI compliance
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, this PR should target 3.0.0 in which this feature is newly added.
### How was this patch tested?
add more unit tests
Closes#28310 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31527.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR modifies LegacyDateFormatter#parse to return proleptic Gregorian days rather than hybrid Julian days.
### Why are the changes needed?
The legacy time parser currently returns epoch days in the hybrid Julian calendar. However, the callers to the legacy parser (e.g., UnivocityParser, JacksonParser) expect epoch days in the proleptic Gregorian calendar. As a result, pre-Gregorian dates like '1000-01-01' get interpreted as '1000-01-06'.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Manual testing and modified existing unit tests.
Closes#28345 from bersprockets/SPARK-31557.
Authored-by: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes a CTE substitution issue so as to the following SQL return the correct empty result:
```
WITH t(c) AS (SELECT 1)
SELECT * FROM t
WHERE c IN (
WITH t(c) AS (SELECT 2)
SELECT * FROM t
)
```
Before this PR the result was `1`.
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a correctness issue.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, fixes a correctness issue.
### How was this patch tested?
Added new test case.
Closes#28318 from peter-toth/SPARK-31535-fix-nested-cte-substitution.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to fix the `InSet.sql` method for the cases when input collection contains values of internal Catalyst's types, for instance `UTF8String`. Elements of the input set `hset` are converted to Scala types, and wrapped by `Literal` to properly form SQL view of the input collection.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes fixed the bug in `InSet.sql` that makes wrong assumption about types of collection elements. See more details in SPARK-31563.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Highly likely, not.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `ColumnExpressionSuite`
Closes#28343 from MaxGekk/fix-InSet-sql.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
the 2 method `arrayClassFor` and `dataTypeFor` in `ScalaReflection` call each other circularly, the cases in `dataTypeFor` are not fully handled in `arrayClassFor`
For example:
```scala
scala> implicit def newArrayEncoder[T <: Array[_] : TypeTag]: Encoder[T] = ExpressionEncoder()
newArrayEncoder: [T <: Array[_]](implicit evidence$1: reflect.runtime.universe.TypeTag[T])org.apache.spark.sql.Encoder[T]
scala> val decOne = Decimal(1, 38, 18)
decOne: org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal = 1E-18
scala> val decTwo = Decimal(2, 38, 18)
decTwo: org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal = 2E-18
scala> val decSpark = Array(decOne, decTwo)
decSpark: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal] = Array(1E-18, 2E-18)
scala> Seq(decSpark).toDF()
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.sql.types.DecimalType cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.types.ObjectType
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.$anonfun$arrayClassFor$1(ScalaReflection.scala:131)
at scala.reflect.internal.tpe.TypeConstraints$UndoLog.undo(TypeConstraints.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:879)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects$(ScalaReflection.scala:878)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.arrayClassFor(ScalaReflection.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.$anonfun$dataTypeFor$1(ScalaReflection.scala:105)
at scala.reflect.internal.tpe.TypeConstraints$UndoLog.undo(TypeConstraints.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:879)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects$(ScalaReflection.scala:878)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.dataTypeFor(ScalaReflection.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.$anonfun$serializerForType$1(ScalaReflection.scala:399)
at scala.reflect.internal.tpe.TypeConstraints$UndoLog.undo(TypeConstraints.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:879)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection.cleanUpReflectionObjects$(ScalaReflection.scala:878)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.cleanUpReflectionObjects(ScalaReflection.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.ScalaReflection$.serializerForType(ScalaReflection.scala:393)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.ExpressionEncoder$.apply(ExpressionEncoder.scala:57)
at newArrayEncoder(<console>:57)
... 53 elided
scala>
```
In this PR, we add the missing cases to `arrayClassFor`
### Why are the changes needed?
bugfix as described above
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
add a test for array encoders
Closes#28324 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31552.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`LIKE ANY/SOME` and `LIKE ALL` operators are mostly used when we are matching a text field with numbers of patterns. For example:
Teradata / Hive 3.0 / Snowflake:
```sql
--like any
select 'foo' LIKE ANY ('%foo%','%bar%');
--like all
select 'foo' LIKE ALL ('%foo%','%bar%');
```
PostgreSQL:
```sql
-- like any
select 'foo' LIKE ANY (array['%foo%','%bar%']);
-- like all
select 'foo' LIKE ALL (array['%foo%','%bar%']);
```
This PR add support these two operators.
More details:
https://docs.teradata.com/reader/756LNiPSFdY~4JcCCcR5Cw/4~AyrPNmDN0Xk4SALLo6aQhttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15229https://docs.snowflake.net/manuals/sql-reference/functions/like_any.html
### Why are the changes needed?
To smoothly migrate SQLs to Spark SQL.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#27477 from wangyum/SPARK-30724.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Modified `ParquetFilters.valueCanMakeFilterOn()` to accept filters with `java.time.LocalDate` attributes.
2. Modified `ParquetFilters.dateToDays()` to support both types `java.sql.Date` and `java.time.LocalDate` in conversions to days.
3. Add implicit conversion from `LocalDate` to `Expression` (`Literal`).
### Why are the changes needed?
To support pushed down filters with `java.time.LocalDate` attributes. Before the changes, date filters are not pushed down to Parquet datasource when `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled` is `true`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test to `ParquetFilterSuite`
Closes#28259 from MaxGekk/parquet-filter-java8-date-time.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to add a new test suite for `ExpressionInfo`. Major changes are as follows;
- Added a new test suite named `ExpressionInfoSuite`
- To improve test coverage, added a test for error handling in `ExpressionInfoSuite`
- Moved the `ExpressionInfo`-related tests from `UDFSuite` to `ExpressionInfoSuite`
- Moved the related tests from `SQLQuerySuite` to `ExpressionInfoSuite`
- Added a comment in `ExpressionInfoSuite` (followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28224)
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve test suites/coverage.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#28308 from maropu/SPARK-31526.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Override the canonicalized fields with respect to the result of `needsTimeZone`.
### Why are the changes needed?
The current approach breaks sematic equal of two cast expressions that don't relate with datetime type. If we don't need to use `timeZone` information casting `from` type to `to` type, then the timeZoneId should not influence the canonicalize result.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.
Closes#28288 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-31515.
Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
\_FUNC\_ is used in note() of `ExpressionDescription` since https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28248, it can be more cases later, we should replace it with function name for documentation
### Why are the changes needed?
doc fix
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
pass Jenkins, and verify locally with Jekyll serve
Closes#28305 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31474-F.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Document row field values of `DATE` and `TIMESTAMP` type returned by `Row.get()` and `Row.apply`.
- Refer to `Row.get()` from the description of filter values
### Why are the changes needed?
Reflect current behaviour of Row's method `apply()` and `get()` in comments to inform users about different return types that are depended on the SQL config settings `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled`.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Run `$ ./dev/scalastyle`
Closes#28300 from MaxGekk/doc-filter-date-time.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Extracting millennium, century, decade, millisecond, microsecond and epoch from datetime is neither ANSI standard nor quite common in modern SQL platforms. Most of the systems listing below does not support these except PostgreSQL and redshift.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+UDFhttps://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/functions050.htmhttps://prestodb.io/docs/current/functions/datetime.htmlhttps://docs.cloudera.com/documentation/enterprise/5-8-x/topics/impala_datetime_functions.htmlhttps://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/functions-date-time.html#label-supported-date-time-partshttps://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/functions-datetime.html#FUNCTIONS-DATETIME-EXTRACT
This PR removes these extract fields support from extract function for date and timestamp values
`isoyear` is PostgreSQL specific but `yearofweek` is more commonly used across platforms
`isodow` is PostgreSQL specific but `iso` as a suffix is more commonly used across platforms so, `dow_iso` and `dayofweek_iso` is used to replace it.
For historical reasons, we have [`dayofweek`, `dow`] implemented for representing a non-ISO day-of-week and a newly added `isodow` from PostgreSQL for ISO day-of-week. Many other systems only have one week-numbering system support and use either full names or abbreviations. Things in spark become a little bit complicated.
1. because of the existence of `isodow`, so we need to add iso-prefix to `dayofweek` to make a pair for it too. [`dayofweek`, `isodayofweek`, `dow` and `isodow`]
2. because there are rare `iso`-prefixed systems and more systems choose `iso`-suffixed way, so we may result in [`dayofweek`, `dayofweekiso`, `dow`, `dowiso`]
3. `dayofweekiso` looks nice and has use cases in the platforms listed above, e.g. snowflake, but `dowiso` looks weird and no use cases found.
4. with a discussion the community，we have agreed with an underscore before `iso` may look much better because `isodow` is new and there is no standard for `iso` kind of things, so this may be good for us to make it simple and clear for end-users if they are well documented too.
Thus, we finally result in [`dayofweek`, `dow`] for Non-ISO day-of-week system and [`dayofweek_iso`, `dow_iso`] for ISO system
### Why are the changes needed?
Remove some nonstandard and uncommon features as we can add them back if necessary
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO, we should target this to 3.0.0 and these are added during 3.0.0
### How was this patch tested?
Remove unused tests
Closes#28284 from yaooqinn/SPARK-31507.
Authored-by: Kent Yao <yaooqinn@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
