Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
WeichenXu 7f605f5559 [SPARK-28621][SQL] Make spark.sql.crossJoin.enabled default value true
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Make `spark.sql.crossJoin.enabled` default value true

### Why are the changes needed?

For implicit cross join, we can set up a watchdog to cancel it if running for a long time.
When "spark.sql.crossJoin.enabled" is false, because `CheckCartesianProducts` is implemented in logical plan stage, it may generate some mismatching error which may confuse end user:
* it's done in logical phase, so we may fail queries that can be executed via broadcast join, which is very fast.
* if we move the check to the physical phase, then a query may success at the beginning, and begin to fail when the table size gets larger (other people insert data to the table). This can be quite confusing.
* the CROSS JOIN syntax doesn't work well if join reorder happens.
* some non-equi-join will generate plan using cartesian product, but `CheckCartesianProducts` do not detect it and raise error.

So that in order to address this in simpler way, we can turn off showing this cross-join error by default.

For reference, I list some cases raising mismatching error here:
Providing:
```
spark.range(2).createOrReplaceTempView("sm1") // can be broadcast
spark.range(50000000).createOrReplaceTempView("bg1") // cannot be broadcast
spark.range(60000000).createOrReplaceTempView("bg2") // cannot be broadcast
```
1) Some join could be convert to broadcast nested loop join, but CheckCartesianProducts raise error. e.g.
```
select sm1.id, bg1.id from bg1 join sm1 where sm1.id < bg1.id
```
2) Some join will run by CartesianJoin but CheckCartesianProducts DO NOT raise error. e.g.
```
select bg1.id, bg2.id from bg1 join bg2 where bg1.id < bg2.id
```

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

Closes #25520 from WeichenXu123/SPARK-28621.

Authored-by: WeichenXu <weichen.xu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
2019-08-27 21:53:37 +08:00
HyukjinKwon 66179fa842 [SPARK-28418][PYTHON][SQL] Wait for event process in 'test_query_execution_listener_on_collect'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It fixes a flaky test:

```
ERROR [0.164s]: test_query_execution_listener_on_collect (pyspark.sql.tests.test_dataframe.QueryExecutionListenerTests)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/jenkins/python/pyspark/sql/tests/test_dataframe.py", line 758, in test_query_execution_listener_on_collect
    "The callback from the query execution listener should be called after 'collect'")
AssertionError: The callback from the query execution listener should be called after 'collect'
```

Seems it can be failed because the event was somehow delayed but checked first.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually.

Closes #25177 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-28418.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-07-17 18:44:11 +09:00
HyukjinKwon 7c05f61514 [SPARK-28130][PYTHON] Print pretty messages for skipped tests when xmlrunner is available in PySpark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Currently, pretty skipped message added by f7435bec6a mechanism seems not working when xmlrunner is installed apparently.

This PR fixes two things:

1. When `xmlrunner` is installed, seems `xmlrunner` does not respect `vervosity` level in unittests (default is level 1).

    So the output looks as below

    ```
    Running tests...
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    ```

    So it is not caught by our message detection mechanism.

2. If we manually set the `vervocity` level to `xmlrunner`, it prints messages as below:

    ```
    test_mixed_udf (pyspark.sql.tests.test_pandas_udf_scalar.ScalarPandasUDFTests) ... SKIP (0.000s)
    test_mixed_udf_and_sql (pyspark.sql.tests.test_pandas_udf_scalar.ScalarPandasUDFTests) ... SKIP (0.000s)
    ...
    ```

    This is different in our Jenkins machine:

    ```
    test_createDataFrame_column_name_encoding (pyspark.sql.tests.test_arrow.ArrowTests) ... skipped 'Pandas >= 0.23.2 must be installed; however, it was not found.'
    test_createDataFrame_does_not_modify_input (pyspark.sql.tests.test_arrow.ArrowTests) ... skipped 'Pandas >= 0.23.2 must be installed; however, it was not found.'
    ...
    ```

    Note that last `SKIP` is different. This PR fixes the regular expression to catch `SKIP` case as well.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested.

**Before:**

```
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark....
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.... (0s)
...
Tests passed in 562 seconds

========================================================================
...
```

**After:**

```
Starting test(python2.7): pyspark....
Finished test(python2.7): pyspark.... (48s) ... 93 tests were skipped
...
Tests passed in 560 seconds

Skipped tests pyspark.... with python2.7:
      pyspark...(...) ... SKIP (0.000s)
...

========================================================================
...
```

Closes #24927 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-28130.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-06-24 09:58:17 +09:00
HyukjinKwon db48da87f0 [SPARK-27834][SQL][R][PYTHON] Make separate PySpark/SparkR vectorization configurations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled` was added when we add PySpark arrow optimization.
Later, in the current master, SparkR arrow optimization was added and it's controlled by the same configuration `spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled`.

There look two issues about this:

1. `spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled` in PySpark was added from 2.3.0 whereas SparkR optimization was added 3.0.0. The stability is different so it's problematic when we change the default value for one of both optimization first.

2. Suppose users want to share some JVM by PySpark and SparkR. They are currently forced to use the optimization for all or none if the configuration is set globally.

This PR proposes two separate configuration groups for PySpark and SparkR about Arrow optimization:

- Deprecate `spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled`
- Add `spark.sql.execution.arrow.pyspark.enabled` (fallback to `spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled`)
- Add `spark.sql.execution.arrow.sparkr.enabled`
- Deprecate `spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled`
- Add `spark.sql.execution.arrow.pyspark.fallback.enabled ` (fallback to `spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled`)

Note that `spark.sql.execution.arrow.maxRecordsPerBatch` is used within JVM side for both.
Note that `spark.sql.execution.arrow.fallback.enabled` was added due to behaviour change. We don't need it in SparkR - SparkR side has the automatic fallback.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested and some unittests were added.

Closes #24700 from HyukjinKwon/separate-sparkr-arrow.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-06-03 10:01:37 +09:00
Bryan Cutler 5e79ae3b40 [SPARK-23961][SPARK-27548][PYTHON] Fix error when toLocalIterator goes out of scope and properly raise errors from worker
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This fixes an error when a PySpark local iterator, for both RDD and DataFrames, goes out of scope and the connection is closed before fully consuming the iterator. The error occurs on the JVM in the serving thread, when Python closes the local socket while the JVM is writing to it. This usually happens when there is enough data to fill the socket read buffer, causing the write call to block.

Additionally, this fixes a problem when an error occurs in the Python worker and the collect job is cancelled with an exception. Previously, the Python driver was never notified of the error so the user could get a partial result (iteration until the error) and the application will continue. With this change, an error in the worker is sent to the Python iterator and is then raised.

The change here introduces a protocol for PySpark local iterators that work as follows:

1) The local socket connection is made when the iterator is created
2) When iterating, Python first sends a request for partition data as a non-zero integer
3) While the JVM local iterator over partitions has next, it triggers a job to collect the next partition
4) The JVM sends a nonzero response to indicate it has the next partition to send
5) The next partition is sent to Python and read by the PySpark deserializer
6) After sending the entire partition, an `END_OF_DATA_SECTION` is sent to Python which stops the deserializer and allows to make another request
7) When the JVM gets a request from Python but has already consumed it's local iterator, it will send a zero response to Python and both will close the socket cleanly
8) If an error occurs in the worker, a negative response is sent to Python followed by the error message. Python will then raise a RuntimeError with the message, stopping iteration.
9) When the PySpark local iterator is garbage-collected, it will read any remaining data from the current partition (this is data that has already been collected) and send a request of zero to tell the JVM to stop collection jobs and close the connection.

Steps 1, 3, 5, 6 are the same as before. Step 8 was completely missing before because errors in the worker were never communicated back to Python. The other steps add synchronization to allow for a clean closing of the socket, with a small trade-off in performance for each partition. This is mainly because the JVM does not start collecting partition data until it receives a request to do so, where before it would eagerly write all data until the socket receive buffer is full.

## How was this patch tested?

Added new unit tests for DataFrame and RDD `toLocalIterator` and tested not fully consuming the iterator. Manual tests with Python 2.7  and 3.6.

Closes #24070 from BryanCutler/pyspark-toLocalIterator-clean-stop-SPARK-23961.

Authored-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
2019-05-07 14:47:39 -07:00
Bryan Cutler f62f44f2a2 [SPARK-27387][PYTHON][TESTS] Replace sqlutils.assertPandasEqual with Pandas assert_frame_equals
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Running PySpark tests with Pandas 0.24.x causes a failure in `test_pandas_udf_grouped_map` test_supported_types:
`ValueError: The truth value of an array with more than one element is ambiguous. Use a.any() or a.all()`

This is because a column is an ArrayType and the method `sqlutils ReusedSQLTestCase.assertPandasEqual ` does not properly check this.

This PR removes `assertPandasEqual` and replaces it with the built-in `pandas.util.testing.assert_frame_equal` which can properly handle columns of ArrayType and also prints out better diff between the DataFrames when an error occurs.

Additionally, imports of pandas and pyarrow were moved to the top of related test files to avoid duplicating the same import many times.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests

Closes #24306 from BryanCutler/python-pandas-assert_frame_equal-SPARK-27387.

Authored-by: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2019-04-10 07:50:25 +09:00
DylanGuedes 28d3374407 [SPARK-23647][PYTHON][SQL] Adds more types for hint in pyspark
Signed-off-by: DylanGuedes <djmgguedesgmail.com>

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Addition of float, int and list hints for `pyspark.sql` Hint.

## How was this patch tested?

I did manual tests following the same principles used in the Scala version, and also added unit tests.

Closes #20788 from DylanGuedes/jira-21030.

Authored-by: DylanGuedes <djmgguedes@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-12-01 10:37:03 +08:00
hyukjinkwon 03306a6df3 [SPARK-26036][PYTHON] Break large tests.py files into smaller files
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR continues to break down a big large file into smaller files. See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23021. It targets to follow https://github.com/numpy/numpy/tree/master/numpy.

Basically this PR proposes to break down `pyspark/tests.py` into ...:

```
pyspark
...
├── testing
...
│   └── utils.py
├── tests
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── test_appsubmit.py
│   ├── test_broadcast.py
│   ├── test_conf.py
│   ├── test_context.py
│   ├── test_daemon.py
│   ├── test_join.py
│   ├── test_profiler.py
│   ├── test_rdd.py
│   ├── test_readwrite.py
│   ├── test_serializers.py
│   ├── test_shuffle.py
│   ├── test_taskcontext.py
│   ├── test_util.py
│   └── test_worker.py
...
```

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests should cover.

`cd python` and .`/run-tests-with-coverage`. Manually checked they are actually being ran.

Each test (not officially) can be ran via:

```bash
SPARK_TESTING=1 ./bin/pyspark pyspark.tests.test_context
```

Note that if you're using Mac and Python 3, you might have to `OBJC_DISABLE_INITIALIZE_FORK_SAFETY=YES`.

Closes #23033 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-26036.

Authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-11-15 12:30:52 +08:00
hyukjinkwon a7a331df6e [SPARK-26032][PYTHON] Break large sql/tests.py files into smaller files
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is the official first attempt to break huge single `tests.py` file - I did it locally before few times and gave up for some reasons. Now, currently it really makes the unittests super hard to read and difficult to check. To me, it even bothers me to to scroll down the big file. It's one single 7000 lines file!

This is not only readability issue. Since one big test takes most of tests time, the tests don't run in parallel fully - although it will costs to start and stop the context.

We could pick up one example and follow. Given my investigation, the current style looks closer to NumPy structure and looks easier to follow. Please see https://github.com/numpy/numpy/tree/master/numpy.

Basically this PR proposes to break down `pyspark/sql/tests.py` into ...:

```bash
pyspark
...
├── sql
...
│   ├── tests  # Includes all tests broken down from 'pyspark/sql/tests.py'
│   │   │      # Each matchs to module in 'pyspark/sql'. Additionally, some logical group can
│   │   │      # be added. For instance, 'test_arrow.py', 'test_datasources.py' ...
│   │   ├── __init__.py
│   │   ├── test_appsubmit.py
│   │   ├── test_arrow.py
│   │   ├── test_catalog.py
│   │   ├── test_column.py
│   │   ├── test_conf.py
│   │   ├── test_context.py
│   │   ├── test_dataframe.py
│   │   ├── test_datasources.py
│   │   ├── test_functions.py
│   │   ├── test_group.py
│   │   ├── test_pandas_udf.py
│   │   ├── test_pandas_udf_grouped_agg.py
│   │   ├── test_pandas_udf_grouped_map.py
│   │   ├── test_pandas_udf_scalar.py
│   │   ├── test_pandas_udf_window.py
│   │   ├── test_readwriter.py
│   │   ├── test_serde.py
│   │   ├── test_session.py
│   │   ├── test_streaming.py
│   │   ├── test_types.py
│   │   ├── test_udf.py
│   │   └── test_utils.py
...
├── testing  # Includes testing utils that can be used in unittests.
│   ├── __init__.py
│   └── sqlutils.py
...
```

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests should cover.

`cd python` and `./run-tests-with-coverage`. Manually checked they are actually being ran.

Each test (not officially) can be ran via:

```
SPARK_TESTING=1 ./bin/pyspark pyspark.sql.tests.test_pandas_udf_scalar
```

Note that if you're using Mac and Python 3, you might have to `OBJC_DISABLE_INITIALIZE_FORK_SAFETY=YES`.

Closes #23021 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-25344.

Authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
2018-11-14 14:51:11 +08:00