## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new collection function: shuffle. It generates a random permutation of the given array. This implementation uses the "inside-out" version of Fisher-Yates algorithm.
## How was this patch tested?
New tests are added to CollectionExpressionsSuite.scala and DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Author: pkuwm <ihuizhi.lu@gmail.com>
Closes#21802 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23928/shuffle.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a JDBC Option "pushDownPredicate" (default `true`) to allow/disallow predicate push-down in JDBC data source.
## How was this patch tested?
Add a test in `JDBCSuite`
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21875 from maryannxue/spark-24288.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AnalysisBarrier was introduced in SPARK-20392 to improve analysis speed (don't re-analyze nodes that have already been analyzed).
Before AnalysisBarrier, we already had some infrastructure in place, with analysis specific functions (resolveOperators and resolveExpressions). These functions do not recursively traverse down subplans that are already analyzed (with a mutable boolean flag _analyzed). The issue with the old system was that developers started using transformDown, which does a top-down traversal of the plan tree, because there was not top-down resolution function, and as a result analyzer performance became pretty bad.
In order to fix the issue in SPARK-20392, AnalysisBarrier was introduced as a special node and for this special node, transform/transformUp/transformDown don't traverse down. However, the introduction of this special node caused a lot more troubles than it solves. This implicit node breaks assumptions and code in a few places, and it's hard to know when analysis barrier would exist, and when it wouldn't. Just a simple search of AnalysisBarrier in PR discussions demonstrates it is a source of bugs and additional complexity.
Instead, this pull request removes AnalysisBarrier and reverts back to the old approach. We added infrastructure in tests that fail explicitly if transform methods are used in the analyzer.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test suite AnalysisHelperSuite for testing the resolve* methods and transform* methods.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21822 from rxin/SPARK-24865.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In most cases, we should use `spark.sessionState.newHadoopConf()` instead of `sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration`, so that the hadoop configurations specified in Spark session
configuration will come into effect.
Add a rule matching `spark.sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration` or `spark.sqlContext.sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration` to prevent the usage.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21873 from gengliangwang/linterRule.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is an extension to the original PR, in which rule exclusion did not work for classes derived from Optimizer, e.g., SparkOptimizer.
To solve this issue, Optimizer and its derived classes will define/override `defaultBatches` and `nonExcludableRules` in order to define its default rule set as well as rules that cannot be excluded by the SQL config. In the meantime, Optimizer's `batches` method is dedicated to the rule exclusion logic and is defined "final".
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT.
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21876 from maryannxue/rule-exclusion.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to the followings.
1. Like `com.databricks.spark.csv` mapping, we had better map `com.databricks.spark.avro` to built-in Avro data source.
2. Remove incorrect error message, `Please find an Avro package at ...`.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the newly added tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#21878 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-24924.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If we use `reverse` function for array type of primitive type containing `null` and the child array is `UnsafeArrayData`, the function returns a wrong result because `UnsafeArrayData` doesn't define the behavior of re-assignment, especially we can't set a valid value after we set `null`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added some tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21830 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-24878/fix_reverse.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```Scala
val udf1 = udf({(x: Int, y: Int) => x + y})
val df = spark.range(0, 3).toDF("a")
.withColumn("b", udf1($"a", udf1($"a", lit(10))))
df.cache()
df.write.saveAsTable("t")
```
Cache is not being used because the plans do not match with the cached plan. This is a regression caused by the changes we made in AnalysisBarrier, since not all the Analyzer rules are idempotent.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test.
Also found a bug in the DSV1 write path. This is not a regression. Thus, opened a separate JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24869
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21821 from gatorsmile/testMaster22.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Besides spark setting spark.sql.sources.partitionOverwriteMode also allow setting partitionOverWriteMode per write
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test in InsertSuite
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Koert Kuipers <koert@tresata.com>
Closes#21818 from koertkuipers/feat-partition-overwrite-mode-per-write.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to extend the `StructType`/`StructField` classes by new method `toDDL` which converts a value of the `StructType`/`StructField` type to a string formatted in DDL style. The resulted string can be used in a table creation.
The `toDDL` method of `StructField` is reused in `SHOW CREATE TABLE`. In this way the PR fixes the bug of unquoted names of nested fields.
## How was this patch tested?
I add a test for checking the new method and 2 round trip tests: `fromDDL` -> `toDDL` and `toDDL` -> `fromDDL`
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21803 from MaxGekk/to-ddl.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improvement `IN` predicate type mismatched message:
```sql
Mismatched columns:
[(, t, 4, ., `, t, 4, a, `, :, d, o, u, b, l, e, ,, , t, 5, ., `, t, 5, a, `, :, d, e, c, i, m, a, l, (, 1, 8, ,, 0, ), ), (, t, 4, ., `, t, 4, c, `, :, s, t, r, i, n, g, ,, , t, 5, ., `, t, 5, c, `, :, b, i, g, i, n, t, )]
```
After this patch:
```sql
Mismatched columns:
[(t4.`t4a`:double, t5.`t5a`:decimal(18,0)), (t4.`t4c`:string, t5.`t5c`:bigint)]
```
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21863 from wangyum/SPARK-18874.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for custom encoding on csv writer, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19018
## How was this patch tested?
Added two unit tests in CSVSuite
Author: crafty-coder <carlospb86@gmail.com>
Author: Carlos <crafty-coder@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#20949 from crafty-coder/master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Thanks to henryr for the original idea at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21049
Description from the original PR :
Subqueries (at least in SQL) have 'bag of tuples' semantics. Ordering
them is therefore redundant (unless combined with a limit).
This patch removes the top sort operators from the subquery plans.
This closes https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21049.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases in SubquerySuite to cover in, exists and scalar subqueries.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21853 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-23957.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When `trueValue` and `falseValue` are semantic equivalence, the condition expression in `if` can be removed to avoid extra computation in runtime.
## How was this patch tested?
Test added.
Author: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Closes#21848 from dbtsai/short-circuit-if.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The HandleNullInputsForUDF would always add a new `If` node every time it is applied. That would cause a difference between the same plan being analyzed once and being analyzed twice (or more), thus raising issues like plan not matched in the cache manager. The solution is to mark the arguments as null-checked, which is to add a "KnownNotNull" node above those arguments, when adding the UDF under an `If` node, because clearly the UDF will not be called when any of those arguments is null.
## How was this patch tested?
Add new tests under sql/UDFSuite and AnalysisSuite.
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21851 from maryannxue/spark-24891.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This updates the DataSourceV2 API to use InternalRow instead of Row for the default case with no scan mix-ins.
Support for readers that produce Row is added through SupportsDeprecatedScanRow, which matches the previous API. Readers that used Row now implement this class and should be migrated to InternalRow.
Readers that previously implemented SupportsScanUnsafeRow have been migrated to use no SupportsScan mix-ins and produce InternalRow.
## How was this patch tested?
This uses existing tests.
Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Closes#21118 from rdblue/SPARK-23325-datasource-v2-internal-row.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modified the canonicalized to not case-insensitive.
Before the PR, cache can't work normally if there are case letters in SQL,
for example:
sql("CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS src (key INT, value STRING) USING hive")
sql("select key, sum(case when Key > 0 then 1 else 0 end) as positiveNum " +
"from src group by key").cache().createOrReplaceTempView("src_cache")
sql(
s"""select a.key
from
(select key from src_cache where positiveNum = 1)a
left join
(select key from src_cache )b
on a.key=b.key
""").explain
The physical plan of the sql is:
The subquery "select key from src_cache where positiveNum = 1" on the left of join can use the cache data, but the subquery "select key from src_cache" on the right of join cannot use the cache data.
## How was this patch tested?
new added test
Author: 10129659 <chen.yanshan@zte.com.cn>
Closes#21823 from eatoncys/canonicalized.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Streaming queries with watermarks do not work with Trigger.Once because of the following.
- Watermark is updated in the driver memory after a batch completes, but it is persisted to checkpoint (in the offset log) only when the next batch is planned
- In trigger.once, the query terminated as soon as one batch has completed. Hence, the updated watermark is never persisted anywhere.
The simple solution is to persist the updated watermark value in the commit log when a batch is marked as completed. Then the next batch, in the next trigger.once run can pick it up from the commit log.
## How was this patch tested?
new unit tests
Co-authored-by: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: c-horn <chorn4033gmail.com>
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21746 from tdas/SPARK-24699.
This commit adds the `cascadeTruncate` option to the JDBC datasource
API, for databases that support this functionality (PostgreSQL and
Oracle at the moment). This allows for applying a cascading truncate
that affects tables that have foreign key constraints on the table
being truncated.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `cascadeTruncate` option to JDBC datasource API. Allow this to affect the
`TRUNCATE` query for databases that support this option.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests for `truncateQuery` were updated. Also, an additional test was added
to ensure that the correct syntax was applied, and that enabling the config for databases
that do not support this option does not result in invalid queries.
Author: Daniel van der Ende <daniel.vanderende@gmail.com>
Closes#20057 from danielvdende/SPARK-22880.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
### What's problem?
In some cases, sub scalar query could throw a NPE, which is caused in execution side.
```
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec.<init>(DataSourceScanExec.scala:169)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec.doCanonicalize(DataSourceScanExec.scala:526)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec.doCanonicalize(DataSourceScanExec.scala:159)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.canonicalized$lzycompute(QueryPlan.scala:211)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.canonicalized(QueryPlan.scala:210)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan$$anonfun$3.apply(QueryPlan.scala:225)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan$$anonfun$3.apply(QueryPlan.scala:225)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.map(List.scala:296)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.doCanonicalize(QueryPlan.scala:225)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.canonicalized$lzycompute(QueryPlan.scala:211)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.canonicalized(QueryPlan.scala:210)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.sameResult(QueryPlan.scala:258)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ScalarSubquery.semanticEquals(subquery.scala:58)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions$Expr.equals(EquivalentExpressions.scala:36)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashTable$class.elemEquals(HashTable.scala:364)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.elemEquals(HashMap.scala:40)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashTable$class.scala$collection$mutable$HashTable$$findEntry0(HashTable.scala:139)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashTable$class.findEntry(HashTable.scala:135)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.findEntry(HashMap.scala:40)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.get(HashMap.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions.addExpr(EquivalentExpressions.scala:56)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions.addExprTree(EquivalentExpressions.scala:97)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions$$anonfun$addExprTree$1.apply(EquivalentExpressions.scala:98)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions$$anonfun$addExprTree$1.apply(EquivalentExpressions.scala:98)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions.addExprTree(EquivalentExpressions.scala:98)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodegenContext$$anonfun$subexpressionElimination$1.apply(CodeGenerator.scala:1102)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodegenContext$$anonfun$subexpressionElimination$1.apply(CodeGenerator.scala:1102)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodegenContext.subexpressionElimination(CodeGenerator.scala:1102)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodegenContext.generateExpressions(CodeGenerator.scala:1154)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.GenerateUnsafeProjection$.createCode(GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala:270)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.GenerateUnsafeProjection$.create(GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.GenerateUnsafeProjection$.generate(GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala:308)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeProjection$.create(Projection.scala:181)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ProjectExec$$anonfun$9.apply(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:71)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ProjectExec$$anonfun$9.apply(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:818)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:818)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:324)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:324)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:109)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:367)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```
### How does this happen?
Here looks what happen now:
1. Sub scalar query was made (for instance `SELECT (SELECT id FROM foo)`).
2. Try to extract some common expressions (via `CodeGenerator.subexpressionElimination`) so that it can generates some common codes and can be reused.
3. During this, seems it extracts some expressions that can be reused (via `EquivalentExpressions.addExprTree`)
b2deef64f6/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala (L1102)
4. During this, if the hash (`EquivalentExpressions.Expr.hashCode`) happened to be the same at `EquivalentExpressions.addExpr` anyhow, `EquivalentExpressions.Expr.equals` is called to identify object in the same hash, which eventually calls `semanticEquals` in `ScalarSubquery`
087879a77a/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala (L54)087879a77a/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala (L36)
5. `ScalarSubquery`'s `semanticEquals` needs `SubqueryExec`'s `sameResult`
77a2fc5b52/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/subquery.scala (L58)
6. `SubqueryExec`'s `sameResult` requires a canonicalized plan which calls `FileSourceScanExec`'s `doCanonicalize`
e008ad1752/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala (L258)
7. In `FileSourceScanExec`'s `doCanonicalize`, `FileSourceScanExec`'s `relation` is required but seems `transient` so it becomes `null`.
e76b0124fb/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala (L527)e76b0124fb/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala (L160)
8. NPE is thrown.
\*1. driver side
\*2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8. executor side
Note that most of cases, it looks fine because we will usually call:
087879a77a/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala (L40)
which make a canonicalized plan via:
b045315e5d/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala (L192)77a2fc5b52/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/subquery.scala (L52)
### How to reproduce?
This looks what happened now. I can reproduce this by a bit of messy way:
```diff
diff --git a/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala b/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala
index 8d06804ce1e..d25fc9a7ba9 100644
--- a/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala
+++ b/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala
-37,7 +37,9 class EquivalentExpressions {
case _ => false
}
- override def hashCode: Int = e.semanticHash()
+ override def hashCode: Int = {
+ 1
+ }
}
```
```scala
spark.range(1).write.mode("overwrite").parquet("/tmp/foo")
spark.read.parquet("/tmp/foo").createOrReplaceTempView("foo")
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage", false)
sql("SELECT (SELECT id FROM foo) == (SELECT id FROM foo)").collect()
```
### How does this PR fix?
- Make all variables that access to `FileSourceScanExec`'s `relation` as `lazy val` so that we avoid NPE. This is a temporary fix.
- Allow `makeCopy` in `SparkPlan` without Spark session too. This looks still able to be accessed within executor side. For instance:
```
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:47)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.withNewChildren(TreeNode.scala:233)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.doCanonicalize(QueryPlan.scala:243)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.canonicalized$lzycompute(QueryPlan.scala:211)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.canonicalized(QueryPlan.scala:210)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.sameResult(QueryPlan.scala:258)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ScalarSubquery.semanticEquals(subquery.scala:58)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions$Expr.equals(EquivalentExpressions.scala:36)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashTable$class.elemEquals(HashTable.scala:364)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.elemEquals(HashMap.scala:40)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashTable$class.scala$collection$mutable$HashTable$$findEntry0(HashTable.scala:139)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashTable$class.findEntry(HashTable.scala:135)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.findEntry(HashMap.scala:40)
at scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.get(HashMap.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions.addExpr(EquivalentExpressions.scala:54)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions.addExprTree(EquivalentExpressions.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions$$anonfun$addExprTree$1.apply(EquivalentExpressions.scala:96)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions$$anonfun$addExprTree$1.apply(EquivalentExpressions.scala:96)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.EquivalentExpressions.addExprTree(EquivalentExpressions.scala:96)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodegenContext$$anonfun$subexpressionElimination$1.apply(CodeGenerator.scala:1102)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodegenContext$$anonfun$subexpressionElimination$1.apply(CodeGenerator.scala:1102)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodegenContext.subexpressionElimination(CodeGenerator.scala:1102)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.CodegenContext.generateExpressions(CodeGenerator.scala:1154)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.GenerateUnsafeProjection$.createCode(GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala:270)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.GenerateUnsafeProjection$.create(GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.GenerateUnsafeProjection$.generate(GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala:308)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeProjection$.create(Projection.scala:181)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ProjectExec$$anonfun$9.apply(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:71)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.ProjectExec$$anonfun$9.apply(basicPhysicalOperators.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:818)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndexInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:818)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:324)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:324)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:109)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:367)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
```
This PR takes over https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20856.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and unit test was added.
Closes#20856
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Closes#21815 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-23731.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Enhances the parser and analyzer to support ANSI compliant syntax for GROUPING SET. As part of this change we derive the grouping expressions from user supplied groupings in the grouping sets clause.
```SQL
SELECT c1, c2, max(c3)
FROM t1
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS ((c1), (c1, c2))
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in SQLQueryTestSuite and ResolveGroupingAnalyticsSuite.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21813 from dilipbiswal/spark-24424.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As stated in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21321, in the error messages we should use `catalogString`. This is not the case, as SPARK-22893 used `simpleString` in order to have the same representation everywhere and it missed some places.
The PR unifies the messages using alway the `catalogString` representation of the dataTypes in the messages.
## How was this patch tested?
existing/modified UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21804 from mgaido91/SPARK-24268_catalog.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`RateSourceSuite` may leave garbage files under `sql/core/dummy`, we should use a corrected temp directory
## How was this patch tested?
test only
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21817 from cloud-fan/minor.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the group state of user-defined-type is encoded as top-level columns in the UnsafeRows stores in the state store. The timeout timestamp is also saved as (when needed) as the last top-level column. Since the group state is serialized to top-level columns, you cannot save "null" as a value of state (setting null in all the top-level columns is not equivalent). So we don't let the user set the timeout without initializing the state for a key. Based on user experience, this leads to confusion.
This PR is to change the row format such that the state is saved as nested columns. This would allow the state to be set to null, and avoid these confusing corner cases. However, queries recovering from existing checkpoint will use the previous format to maintain compatibility with existing production queries.
## How was this patch tested?
Refactored existing end-to-end tests and added new tests for explicitly testing obj-to-row conversion for both state formats.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21739 from tdas/SPARK-22187-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the same Parquet footer is read twice in the function `buildReaderWithPartitionValues` of ParquetFileFormat if filter push down is enabled.
Fix it with simple changes.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21814 from gengliangwang/parquetFooter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes breaking down configuration of retaining batch size on state into two pieces: files and in memory (cache). While this patch reuses existing configuration for files, it introduces new configuration, "spark.sql.streaming.maxBatchesToRetainInMemory" to configure max count of batch to retain in memory.
## How was this patch tested?
Apply this patch on top of SPARK-24441 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469), and manually tested in various workloads to ensure overall size of states in memory is around 2x or less of the size of latest version of state, while it was 10x ~ 80x before applying the patch.
Author: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Closes#21700 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-24717.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's a little tricky and fragile to use a dummy filter to switch codegen on/off. For now we should use local/cached relation to switch. In the future when we are able to use a config to turn off codegen, we shall use that.
## How was this patch tested?
test only PR.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21795 from cloud-fan/follow.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Extend the Parser to enable parsing a column list as the pivot column.
2. Extend the Parser and the Pivot node to enable parsing complex expressions with aliases as the pivot value.
3. Add type check and constant check in Analyzer for Pivot node.
## How was this patch tested?
Add tests in pivot.sql
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21720 from maryannxue/spark-24164.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In DatasetSuite.scala, in the 1299 line,
test("SPARK-19896: cannot have circular references in in case class") ,
there are duplicate words "in in". We can get rid of one.
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: 韩田田00222924 <han.tiantian@zte.com.cn>
Closes#21767 from httfighter/inin.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixes lint-java and Scala 2.12 build.
lint-java:
```
[ERROR] src/test/resources/log4j.properties:[0] (misc) NewlineAtEndOfFile: File does not end with a newline.
```
Scala 2.12 build:
```
[error] /.../sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousCoalesceRDD.scala:121: overloaded method value addTaskCompletionListener with alternatives:
[error] (f: org.apache.spark.TaskContext => Unit)org.apache.spark.TaskContext <and>
[error] (listener: org.apache.spark.util.TaskCompletionListener)org.apache.spark.TaskContext
[error] cannot be applied to (org.apache.spark.TaskContext => java.util.List[Runnable])
[error] context.addTaskCompletionListener { ctx =>
[error] ^
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manually executed lint-java and Scala 2.12 build in my local environment.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21801 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-24386_24768/fix_build.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This issue aims to upgrade Apache ORC library from 1.4.4 to 1.5.2 in order to bring the following benefits into Apache Spark.
- [ORC-91](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-91) Support for variable length blocks in HDFS (The current space wasted in ORC to padding is known to be 5%.)
- [ORC-344](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-344) Support for using Decimal64ColumnVector
In addition to that, Apache Hive 3.1 and 3.2 will use ORC 1.5.1 ([HIVE-19669](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19465)) and 1.5.2 ([HIVE-19792](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19792)) respectively. This will improve the compatibility between Apache Spark and Apache Hive by sharing the common library.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with all existing tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#21582 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-24576.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove the non-negative checks of window start time to make window support negative start time, and add a check to guarantee the absolute value of start time is less than slide duration.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests.
Author: HanShuliang <kevinzwx1992@gmail.com>
Closes#18903 from KevinZwx/dev.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We have some functions which need to aware the nullabilities of all children, such as `CreateArray`, `CreateMap`, `Concat`, and so on. Currently we add casts to fix the nullabilities, but the casts might be removed during the optimization phase.
After the discussion, we decided to not add extra casts for just fixing the nullabilities of the nested types, but handle them by functions themselves.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified and added some tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21704 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-24734/concat_containsnull.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support Decimal type push down to the parquet data sources.
The Decimal comparator used is: [`BINARY_AS_SIGNED_INTEGER_COMPARATOR`](c6764c4a08/parquet-column/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/schema/PrimitiveComparator.java (L224-L292)).
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and manual tests.
**manual tests**:
```scala
spark.range(10000000).selectExpr("id", "cast(id as decimal(9)) as d1", "cast(id as decimal(9, 2)) as d2", "cast(id as decimal(18)) as d3", "cast(id as decimal(18, 4)) as d4", "cast(id as decimal(38)) as d5", "cast(id as decimal(38, 18)) as d6").coalesce(1).write.option("parquet.block.size", 1048576).parquet("/tmp/spark/parquet/decimal")
val df = spark.read.parquet("/tmp/spark/parquet/decimal/")
spark.sql("set spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown.decimal=true")
// Only read about 1 MB data
df.filter("d2 = 10000").show
// Only read about 1 MB data
df.filter("d4 = 10000").show
spark.sql("set spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown.decimal=false")
// Read 174.3 MB data
df.filter("d2 = 10000").show
// Read 174.3 MB data
df.filter("d4 = 10000").show
```
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21556 from wangyum/SPARK-24549.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to move `testFile()` to the common trait `SQLTestUtilsBase` and wrap test files in `AvroSuite` by the method `testFile()` which returns full paths to test files in the resource folder.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21773 from MaxGekk/test-file.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr modified code to project required data from CSV parsed data when column pruning disabled.
In the current master, an exception below happens if `spark.sql.csv.parser.columnPruning.enabled` is false. This is because required formats and CSV parsed formats are different from each other;
```
./bin/spark-shell --conf spark.sql.csv.parser.columnPruning.enabled=false
scala> val dir = "/tmp/spark-csv/csv"
scala> spark.range(10).selectExpr("id % 2 AS p", "id").write.mode("overwrite").partitionBy("p").csv(dir)
scala> spark.read.csv(dir).selectExpr("sum(p)").collect()
18/06/25 13:48:46 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 2.0 in stage 2.0 (TID 7)
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer
at scala.runtime.BoxesRunTime.unboxToInt(BoxesRunTime.java:101)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BaseGenericInternalRow$class.getInt(rows.scala:41)
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CSVSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21657 from maropu/SPARK-24676.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Timestamp` support pushdown to parquet data source.
Only `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` and `TIMESTAMP_MILLIS` support push down.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and benchmark tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21741 from wangyum/SPARK-24718.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The original pr is: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18424
Add a new optimizer rule to convert an IN predicate to an equivalent Parquet filter and add `spark.sql.parquet.pushdown.inFilterThreshold` to control limit thresholds. Different data types have different limit thresholds, this is a copy of data for reference:
Type | limit threshold
-- | --
string | 370
int | 210
long | 285
double | 270
float | 220
decimal | Won't provide better performance before [SPARK-24549](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24549)
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and manual tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21603 from wangyum/SPARK-17091.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we use a reference from Dataset in filter or sort, which was not used in the prior select, an AnalysisException occurs, e.g.,
```scala
val df = Seq(("test1", 0), ("test2", 1)).toDF("name", "id")
df.select(df("name")).filter(df("id") === 0).show()
```
```scala
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Resolved attribute(s) id#6 missing from name#5 in operator !Filter (id#6 = 0).;;
!Filter (id#6 = 0)
+- AnalysisBarrier
+- Project [name#5]
+- Project [_1#2 AS name#5, _2#3 AS id#6]
+- LocalRelation [_1#2, _2#3]
```
This change updates the rule `ResolveMissingReferences` so `Filter` and `Sort` with non-empty `missingInputs` will also be transformed.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#21745 from viirya/SPARK-24781.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Relax the check to allow complex aggregate expressions, like `ceil(sum(col1))` or `sum(col1) + 1`, which roughly means any aggregate expression that could appear in an Aggregate plan except pandas UDF (due to the fact that it is not supported in pivot yet).
## How was this patch tested?
Added 2 tests in pivot.sql
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21753 from maryannxue/pivot-relax-syntax.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR is a followup to move the test cases introduced by the original PR in their proper location.
## How was this patch tested?
moved UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21751 from mgaido91/SPARK-24208_followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The reader schema is said to be evolved (or projected) when it changed after the data is written. The followings are already supported in file-based data sources. Note that partition columns are not maintained in files. In this PR, `column` means `non-partition column`.
1. Add a column
2. Hide a column
3. Change a column position
4. Change a column type (upcast)
This issue aims to guarantee users a backward-compatible read-schema test coverage on file-based data sources and to prevent future regressions by *adding read schema tests explicitly*.
Here, we consider safe changes without data loss. For example, data type change should be from small types to larger types like `int`-to-`long`, not vice versa.
As of today, in the master branch, file-based data sources have the following coverage.
File Format | Coverage | Note
----------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------
TEXT | N/A | Schema consists of a single string column.
CSV | 1, 2, 4 |
JSON | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
ORC | 1, 2, 3, 4 | Native vectorized ORC reader has the widest coverage among ORC formats.
PARQUET | 1, 2, 3 |
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with newly added test suites.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#20208 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-SCHEMA-EVOLUTION.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21389, data source schema is validated on driver side before launching read/write tasks.
However,
1. Putting all the validations together in `DataSourceUtils` is tricky and hard to maintain. On second thought after review, I find that the `OrcFileFormat` in hive package is not matched, so that its validation wrong.
2. `DataSourceUtils.verifyWriteSchema` and `DataSourceUtils.verifyReadSchema` is not supposed to be called in every file format. We can move them to some upper entry.
So, I propose we can add a new method `validateDataType` in FileFormat. File format implementation can override the method to specify its supported/non-supported data types.
Although we should focus on data source V2 API, `FileFormat` should remain workable for some time. Adding this new method should be helpful.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21667 from gengliangwang/refactorSchemaValidate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `array_union`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
This function returns returns an array of the elements in the union of array1 and array2.
Note: The order of elements in the result is not defined.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21061 from kiszk/SPARK-23914.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to extend `RuntimeConfig` by new method `isModifiable()` which returns `true` if a config parameter can be modified at runtime (for current session state). For static SQL and core parameters, the method returns `false`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test to `RuntimeConfigSuite` for checking Spark core and SQL parameters.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21730 from MaxGekk/is-modifiable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR simplifies the retrieval of config in `size`, as we can access them from tasks too thanks to SPARK-24250.
## How was this patch tested?
existing UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21736 from mgaido91/SPARK-24605_followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In ProgressReporter for streams, we use the `committedOffsets` as the startOffset and `availableOffsets` as the end offset when reporting the status of a trigger in `finishTrigger`. This is a bad pattern that has existed since the beginning of ProgressReporter and it is bad because its super hard to reason about when `availableOffsets` and `committedOffsets` are updated, and when they are recorded. Case in point, this bug silently existed in ContinuousExecution, since before MicroBatchExecution was refactored.
The correct fix it to record the offsets explicitly. This PR adds a simple method which is explicitly called from MicroBatch/ContinuousExecition before updating the `committedOffsets`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21744 from tdas/SPARK-24697.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A self-join on a dataset which contains a `FlatMapGroupsInPandas` fails because of duplicate attributes. This happens because we are not dealing with this specific case in our `dedupAttr` rules.
The PR fix the issue by adding the management of the specific case
## How was this patch tested?
added UT + manual tests
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Author: Marco Gaido <mgaido@hortonworks.com>
Closes#21737 from mgaido91/SPARK-24208.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR proposes to add support for running the same SQL test input files against different configs leading to the same result.
## How was this patch tested?
Involved UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21568 from mgaido91/SPARK-24562.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is proposing a fix for the output data type of ```If``` and ```CaseWhen``` expression. Upon till now, the implementation of exprassions has ignored nullability of nested types from different execution branches and returned the type of the first branch.
This could lead to an unwanted ```NullPointerException``` from other expressions depending on a ```If```/```CaseWhen``` expression.
Example:
```
val rows = new util.ArrayList[Row]()
rows.add(Row(true, ("a", 1)))
rows.add(Row(false, (null, 2)))
val schema = StructType(Seq(
StructField("cond", BooleanType, false),
StructField("s", StructType(Seq(
StructField("val1", StringType, true),
StructField("val2", IntegerType, false)
)), false)
))
val df = spark.createDataFrame(rows, schema)
df
.select(when('cond, struct(lit("x").as("val1"), lit(10).as("val2"))).otherwise('s) as "res")
.select('res.getField("val1"))
.show()
```
Exception:
```
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.codegen.UnsafeWriter.write(UnsafeWriter.java:109)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$SpecificUnsafeProjection.apply(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.LocalTableScanExec$$anonfun$unsafeRows$1.apply(LocalTableScanExec.scala:44)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.LocalTableScanExec$$anonfun$unsafeRows$1.apply(LocalTableScanExec.scala:44)
...
```
Output schema:
```
root
|-- res.val1: string (nullable = false)
```
## How was this patch tested?
New test cases added into
- DataFrameSuite.scala
- conditionalExpressions.scala
Author: Marek Novotny <mn.mikke@gmail.com>
Closes#21687 from mn-mikke/SPARK-24165.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when a streaming query has multiple watermark, the policy is to choose the min of them as the global watermark. This is safe to do as the global watermark moves with the slowest stream, and is therefore is safe as it does not unexpectedly drop some data as late, etc. While this is indeed the safe thing to do, in some cases, you may want the watermark to advance with the fastest stream, that is, take the max of multiple watermarks. This PR is to add that configuration. It makes the following changes.
- Adds a configuration to specify max as the policy.
- Saves the configuration in OffsetSeqMetadata because changing it in the middle can lead to unpredictable results.
- For old checkpoints without the configuration, it assumes the default policy as min (irrespective of the policy set at the session where the query is being restarted). This is to ensure that existing queries are affected in any way.
TODO
- [ ] Add a test for recovery from existing checkpoints.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit test
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21701 from tdas/SPARK-24730.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support the LIMIT operator in structured streaming.
For streams in append or complete output mode, a stream with a LIMIT operator will return no more than the specified number of rows. LIMIT is still unsupported for the update output mode.
This change reverts e4fee395ec as part of it because it is a better and more complete implementation.
## How was this patch tested?
New and existing unit tests.
Author: Mukul Murthy <mukul.murthy@gmail.com>
Closes#21662 from mukulmurthy/SPARK-24662.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is the first follow-up of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21573 , which was only merged to 2.3.
This PR fixes the memory leak in another way: free the `UnsafeExternalMap` when the task ends. All the data buffers in Spark SQL are using `UnsafeExternalMap` and `UnsafeExternalSorter` under the hood, e.g. sort, aggregate, window, SMJ, etc. `UnsafeExternalSorter` registers a task completion listener to free the resource, we should apply the same thing to `UnsafeExternalMap`.
TODO in the next PR:
do not consume all the inputs when having limit in whole stage codegen.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21738 from cloud-fan/limit.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As the implementation of the broadcast hash join is independent of the input hash partitioning, reordering keys is not necessary. Thus, we solve this issue by simply removing the broadcast hash join from the reordering rule in EnsureRequirements.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21728 from gatorsmile/cleanER.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-22893 tried to unify error messages about dataTypes. Unfortunately, still many places were missing the `simpleString` method in other to have the same representation everywhere.
The PR unified the messages using alway the simpleString representation of the dataTypes in the messages.
## How was this patch tested?
existing/modified UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21321 from mgaido91/SPARK-24268.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implement map_concat high order function.
This implementation does not pick a winner when the specified maps have overlapping keys. Therefore, this implementation preserves existing duplicate keys in the maps and potentially introduces new duplicates (After discussion with ueshin, we settled on option 1 from [here](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23936?focusedCommentId=16464245&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16464245)).
## How was this patch tested?
New tests
Manual tests
Run all sbt SQL tests
Run all pyspark sql tests
Author: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>
Closes#21073 from bersprockets/SPARK-23936.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to provide a tip to user how to resolve the issue of timeout expiration for broadcast joins. In particular, they can increase the timeout via **spark.sql.broadcastTimeout** or disable the broadcast at all by setting **spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold** to `-1`.
## How was this patch tested?
It tested manually from `spark-shell`:
```
scala> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.broadcastTimeout", 1)
scala> val df = spark.range(100).join(spark.range(15).as[Long].map { x =>
Thread.sleep(5000)
x
}).where("id = value")
scala> df.count()
```
```
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Could not execute broadcast in 1 secs. You can increase the timeout for broadcasts via spark.sql.broadcastTimeout or disable broadcast join by setting spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold to -1
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.exchange.BroadcastExchangeExec.doExecuteBroadcast(BroadcastExchangeExec.scala:150)
```
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21727 from MaxGekk/broadcast-timeout-error.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SQL `Aggregator` with output type `Option[Boolean]` creates column of type `StructType`. It's not in consistency with a Dataset of similar java class.
This changes the way `definedByConstructorParams` checks given type. For `Option[_]`, it goes to check its type argument.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#21611 from viirya/SPARK-24569.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refer to the [`WideSchemaBenchmark`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v2.3.1/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark.scala) update `FilterPushdownBenchmark`:
1. Write the result to `benchmarks/FilterPushdownBenchmark-results.txt` for easy maintenance.
2. Add more benchmark case: `StringStartsWith`, `Decimal`, `InSet -> InFilters` and `tinyint`.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21677 from wangyum/SPARK-24692.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If table is renamed to a existing new location, data won't show up.
```
scala> Seq("hello").toDF("a").write.format("parquet").saveAsTable("t")
scala> sql("select * from t").show()
+-----+
| a|
+-----+
|hello|
+-----+
scala> sql("alter table t rename to test")
res2: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = []
scala> sql("select * from test").show()
+---+
| a|
+---+
+---+
```
The file layout is like
```
$ tree test
test
├── gabage
└── t
├── _SUCCESS
└── part-00000-856b0f10-08f1-42d6-9eb3-7719261f3d5e-c000.snappy.parquet
```
In Hive, if the new location exists, the renaming will fail even the location is empty.
We should have the same validation in Catalog, in case of unexpected bugs.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit test.
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21655 from gengliangwang/validate_rename_table.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add an overloaded version to `from_utc_timestamp` and `to_utc_timestamp` having second argument as a `Column` instead of `String`.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit testing, especially adding two tests to org.apache.spark.sql.DateFunctionsSuite.scala
Author: Antonio Murgia <antonio.murgia@agilelab.it>
Author: Antonio Murgia <antonio.murgia2@studio.unibo.it>
Closes#21693 from tmnd1991/feature/SPARK-24673.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a minor improvement for the test of SPARK-17213
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21716 from gatorsmile/testMaster23.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since SPARK-24250 has been resolved, executors correctly references user-defined configurations. So, this pr added a static config to control cache size for generated classes in `CodeGenerator`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `ExecutorSideSQLConfSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21705 from maropu/SPARK-24727.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add new function - *schema_of_json()* which infers schema of JSON string literal. The result of the function is a string containing a schema in DDL format.
One of the use cases is using of *schema_of_json()* in the combination with *from_json()*. Currently, _from_json()_ requires a schema as a mandatory argument. The *schema_of_json()* function will allow to point out an JSON string as an example which has the same schema as the first argument of _from_json()_. For instance:
```sql
select from_json(json_column, schema_of_json('{"c1": [0], "c2": [{"c3":0}]}'))
from json_table;
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test to `JsonFunctionsSuite`, `JsonExpressionsSuite` and SQL tests to `json-functions.sql`
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21686 from MaxGekk/infer_schema_json.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Dataset.join we have a small hack for resolving ambiguity in the column name for self-joins. The current code supports only `EqualTo`.
The PR extends the fix to `EqualNullSafe`.
Credit for this PR should be given to daniel-shields.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21605 from mgaido91/SPARK-24385_2.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The ColumnPruning rule tries adding an extra Project if an input node produces fields more than needed, but as a post-processing step, it needs to remove the lower Project in the form of "Project - Filter - Project" otherwise it would conflict with PushPredicatesThroughProject and would thus cause a infinite optimization loop. The current post-processing method is defined as:
```
private def removeProjectBeforeFilter(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform {
case p1 Project(_, f Filter(_, p2 Project(_, child)))
if p2.outputSet.subsetOf(child.outputSet) =>
p1.copy(child = f.copy(child = child))
}
```
This method works well when there is only one Filter but would not if there's two or more Filters. In this case, there is a deterministic filter and a non-deterministic filter so they stay as separate filter nodes and cannot be combined together.
An simplified illustration of the optimization process that forms the infinite loop is shown below (F1 stands for the 1st filter, F2 for the 2nd filter, P for project, S for scan of relation, PredicatePushDown as abbrev. of PushPredicatesThroughProject):
```
F1 - F2 - P - S
PredicatePushDown => F1 - P - F2 - S
ColumnPruning => F1 - P - F2 - P - S
=> F1 - P - F2 - S (Project removed)
PredicatePushDown => P - F1 - F2 - S
ColumnPruning => P - F1 - P - F2 - S
=> P - F1 - P - F2 - P - S
=> P - F1 - F2 - P - S (only one Project removed)
RemoveRedundantProject => F1 - F2 - P - S (goes back to the loop start)
```
So the problem is the ColumnPruning rule adds a Project under a Filter (and fails to remove it in the end), and that new Project triggers PushPredicateThroughProject. Once the filters have been push through the Project, a new Project will be added by the ColumnPruning rule and this goes on and on.
The fix should be when adding Projects, the rule applies top-down, but later when removing extra Projects, the process should go bottom-up to ensure all extra Projects can be matched.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a optimization rule test in ColumnPruningSuite; and a end-to-end test in SQLQuerySuite.
Author: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21674 from maryannxue/spark-24696.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Provide a continuous processing implementation of coalesce(1), as well as allowing aggregates on top of it.
The changes in ContinuousQueuedDataReader and such are to use split.index (the ID of the partition within the RDD currently being compute()d) rather than context.partitionId() (the partition ID of the scheduled task within the Spark job - that is, the post coalesce writer). In the absence of a narrow dependency, these values were previously always the same, so there was no need to distinguish.
## How was this patch tested?
new unit test
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#21560 from jose-torres/coalesce.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A few math functions (`abs` , `bitwiseNOT`, `isnan`, `nanvl`) are not in **math_funcs** group. They should really be.
## How was this patch tested?
Awaiting Jenkins
Author: Jacek Laskowski <jacek@japila.pl>
Closes#21448 from jaceklaskowski/SPARK-24408-math-funcs-doc.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a new test suite to test RecordBinaryComparator.
## How was this patch tested?
New test suite.
Author: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Closes#21570 from jiangxb1987/rbc-test.
findTightestCommonTypeOfTwo has been renamed to findTightestCommonType
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Fokko Driesprong <fokkodriesprong@godatadriven.com>
Closes#21597 from Fokko/fd-typo.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr corrected the default configuration (`spark.master=local[1]`) for benchmarks. Also, this updated performance results on the AWS `r3.xlarge`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21625 from maropu/FixDataSourceReadBenchmark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the master, when `csvColumnPruning`(implemented in [this commit](64fad0b519 (diff-d19881aceddcaa5c60620fdcda99b4c4))) enabled and partitions scanned only, it throws an exception below;
```
scala> val dir = "/tmp/spark-csv/csv"
scala> spark.range(10).selectExpr("id % 2 AS p", "id").write.mode("overwrite").partitionBy("p").csv(dir)
scala> spark.read.csv(dir).selectExpr("sum(p)").collect()
18/06/25 13:12:51 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 0.0 in stage 2.0 (TID 5)
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.UnivocityParser.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$datasources$csv$UnivocityParser$$convert(UnivocityParser.scala:197)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.UnivocityParser.parse(UnivocityParser.scala:190)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.UnivocityParser$$anonfun$5.apply(UnivocityParser.scala:309)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.csv.UnivocityParser$$anonfun$5.apply(UnivocityParser.scala:309)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FailureSafeParser.parse(FailureSafeParser.scala:61)
...
```
This pr modified code to skip CSV parsing in the case.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `CSVSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21631 from maropu/SPARK-24645.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Updated URL/href links to include a '/' before '?id' to make links consistent and avoid http 302 redirect errors within UI port 4040 tabs.
## How was this patch tested?
Built a runnable distribution and executed jobs. Validated that http 302 redirects are no longer encountered when clicking on links within UI port 4040 tabs.
Author: Steven Kallman <SJKallmangmail.com>
Author: Kallman, Steven <Steven.Kallman@CapitalOne.com>
Closes#21600 from SJKallman/{Spark-24553}{WEB-UI}-redirect-href-fixes.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added code to verify a schema in Json/Orc/ParquetFileFormat along with CSVFileFormat.
## How was this patch tested?
Added verification tests in `FileBasedDataSourceSuite` and `HiveOrcSourceSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21389 from maropu/SPARK-24204.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set createTime for every hive partition created in Spark SQL, which could be used to manage data lifecycle in Hive warehouse. We found that almost every partition modified by spark sql has not been set createTime.
```
mysql> select * from partitions where create_time=0 limit 1\G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
PART_ID: 1028584
CREATE_TIME: 0
LAST_ACCESS_TIME: 1502203611
PART_NAME: date=20170130
SD_ID: 1543605
TBL_ID: 211605
LINK_TARGET_ID: NULL
1 row in set (0.27 sec)
```
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: debugger87 <yangchaozhong.2009@gmail.com>
Author: Chaozhong Yang <yangchaozhong.2009@gmail.com>
Closes#18900 from debugger87/fix/set-create-time-for-hive-partition.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Address comments in #21370 and add more test.
## How was this patch tested?
Enhance test in pyspark/sql/test.py and DataFrameSuite
Author: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Closes#21553 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-24215-follow.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function ```sequence```.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23927
The behavior of the function is based on Presto's one.
Ref: https://prestodb.io/docs/current/functions/array.html
- ```sequence(start, stop) → array<bigint>```
Generate a sequence of integers from ```start``` to ```stop```, incrementing by ```1``` if ```start``` is less than or equal to ```stop```, otherwise ```-1```.
- ```sequence(start, stop, step) → array<bigint>```
Generate a sequence of integers from ```start``` to ```stop```, incrementing by ```step```.
- ```sequence(start_date, stop_date) → array<date>```
Generate a sequence of dates from ```start_date``` to ```stop_date```, incrementing by ```interval 1 day``` if ```start_date``` is less than or equal to ```stop_date```, otherwise ```- interval 1 day```.
- ```sequence(start_date, stop_date, step_interval) → array<date>```
Generate a sequence of dates from ```start_date``` to ```stop_date```, incrementing by ```step_interval```. The type of ```step_interval``` is ```CalendarInterval```.
- ```sequence(start_timestemp, stop_timestemp) → array<timestamp>```
Generate a sequence of timestamps from ```start_timestamps``` to ```stop_timestamps```, incrementing by ```interval 1 day``` if ```start_date``` is less than or equal to ```stop_date```, otherwise ```- interval 1 day```.
- ```sequence(start_timestamp, stop_timestamp, step_interval) → array<timestamp>```
Generate a sequence of timestamps from ```start_timestamps``` to ```stop_timestamps```, incrementing by ```step_interval```. The type of ```step_interval``` is ```CalendarInterval```.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests.
Author: Vayda, Oleksandr: IT (PRG) <Oleksandr.Vayda@barclayscapital.com>
Closes#21155 from wajda/feature/array-api-sequence.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In PR, I propose new behavior of `size(null)` under the config flag `spark.sql.legacy.sizeOfNull`. If the former one is disabled, the `size()` function returns `null` for `null` input. By default the `spark.sql.legacy.sizeOfNull` is enabled to keep backward compatibility with previous versions. In that case, `size(null)` returns `-1`.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified existing tests for the `size()` function to check new behavior (`null`) and old one (`-1`).
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21598 from MaxGekk/legacy-size-of-null.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Here is the description in the JIRA -
Currently, our JDBC connector provides the option `dbtable` for users to specify the to-be-loaded JDBC source table.
```SQL
val jdbcDf = spark.read
.format("jdbc")
.option("dbtable", "dbName.tableName")
.options(jdbcCredentials: Map)
.load()
```
Normally, users do not fetch the whole JDBC table due to the poor performance/throughput of JDBC. Thus, they normally just fetch a small set of tables. For advanced users, they can pass a subquery as the option.
```SQL
val query = """ (select * from tableName limit 10) as tmp """
val jdbcDf = spark.read
.format("jdbc")
.option("dbtable", query)
.options(jdbcCredentials: Map)
.load()
```
However, this is straightforward to end users. We should simply allow users to specify the query by a new option `query`. We will handle the complexity for them.
```SQL
val query = """select * from tableName limit 10"""
val jdbcDf = spark.read
.format("jdbc")
.option("query", query)
.options(jdbcCredentials: Map)
.load()
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in JDBCSuite and JDBCWriterSuite.
Also tested against MySQL, Postgress, Oracle, DB2 (using docker infrastructure) to make sure there are no syntax issues.
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21590 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-24423.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Presto's implementation accepts arbitrary arrays of primitive types as an input:
```
presto> SELECT array_join(ARRAY [1, 2, 3], ', ');
_col0
---------
1, 2, 3
(1 row)
```
This PR proposes to implement a type coercion rule for ```array_join``` function that converts arrays of primitive as well as non-primitive types to arrays of string.
## How was this patch tested?
New test cases add into:
- sql-tests/inputs/typeCoercion/native/arrayJoin.sql
- DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala
Author: Marek Novotny <mn.mikke@gmail.com>
Closes#21620 from mn-mikke/SPARK-24636.
This passes the unique task attempt id instead of attempt number to v2 data sources because attempt number is reused when stages are retried. When attempt numbers are reused, sources that track data by partition id and attempt number may incorrectly clean up data because the same attempt number can be both committed and aborted.
For v1 / Hadoop writes, generate a unique ID based on available attempt numbers to avoid a similar problem.
Closes#21558
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Closes#21606 from vanzin/SPARK-24552.2.
Use LongAdder to make SQLMetrics thread safe.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace += with LongAdder.add() for concurrent counting
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests with local threads
Author: Stacy Kerkela <stacy.kerkela@databricks.com>
Closes#21634 from dbkerkela/sqlmetrics-concurrency-stacy.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In function array_zip, when split is required by the high number of arguments, a codegen error can happen.
The PR fixes codegen for cases when splitting the code is required.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21621 from mgaido91/SPARK-24633.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Add parameter 'cascade' in CacheManager.uncacheQuery(). Under 'cascade=false' mode, only invalidate the current cache, and for other dependent caches, rebuild execution plan and reuse cached buffer.
2. Pass true/false from callers in different uncache scenarios:
- Drop tables and regular (persistent) views: regular mode
- Drop temporary views: non-cascading mode
- Modify table contents (INSERT/UPDATE/MERGE/DELETE): regular mode
- Call `DataSet.unpersist()`: non-cascading mode
- Call `Catalog.uncacheTable()`: follow the same convention as drop tables/view, which is, use non-cascading mode for temporary views and regular mode for the rest
Note that a regular (persistent) view is a database object just like a table, so after dropping a regular view (whether cached or not cached), any query referring to that view should no long be valid. Hence if a cached persistent view is dropped, we need to invalidate the all dependent caches so that exceptions will be thrown for any later reference. On the other hand, a temporary view is in fact equivalent to an unnamed DataSet, and dropping a temporary view should have no impact on queries referencing that view. Thus we should do non-cascading uncaching for temporary views, which also guarantees a consistent uncaching behavior between temporary views and unnamed DataSets.
## How was this patch tested?
New tests in CachedTableSuite and DatasetCacheSuite.
Author: Maryann Xue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21594 from maryannxue/noncascading-cache.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr of #21045 which added `arrays_zip`.
The `arrays_zip` in functions.scala should've been `scala.annotation.varargs`.
This pr makes it `scala.annotation.varargs`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Closes#21630 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-23931/fup1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr modified JDBC datasource code to verify and normalize a partition column based on the JDBC resolved schema before building `JDBCRelation`.
Closes#20370
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `JDBCSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21379 from maropu/SPARK-24327.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, a `pandas_udf` of type `PandasUDFType.GROUPED_MAP` will assign the resulting columns based on index of the return pandas.DataFrame. If a new DataFrame is returned and constructed using a dict, then the order of the columns could be arbitrary and be different than the defined schema for the UDF. If the schema types still match, then no error will be raised and the user will see column names and column data mixed up.
This change will first try to assign columns using the return type field names. If a KeyError occurs, then the column index is checked if it is string based. If so, then the error is raised as it is most likely a naming mistake, else it will fallback to assign columns by position and raise a TypeError if the field types do not match.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test that returns a new DataFrame with column order different than the schema.
Author: Bryan Cutler <cutlerb@gmail.com>
Closes#21427 from BryanCutler/arrow-grouped-map-mixesup-cols-SPARK-24324.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added benchmark code `FilterPushdownBenchmark` for string pushdown and updated performance results on the AWS `r3.xlarge`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21288 from maropu/UpdateParquetBenchmark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, restrictions in JSONOptions for `encoding` and `lineSep` are the same for read and for write. For example, a requirement for `lineSep` in the code:
```
df.write.option("encoding", "UTF-32BE").json(file)
```
doesn't allow to skip `lineSep` and use its default value `\n` because it throws the exception:
```
equirement failed: The lineSep option must be specified for the UTF-32BE encoding
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed: The lineSep option must be specified for the UTF-32BE encoding
```
In the PR, I propose to separate JSONOptions in read and write, and make JSONOptions in write less restrictive.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test for blacklisted encodings in read. And the `lineSep` option was removed in write for some tests.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Author: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Closes#21247 from MaxGekk/json-options-in-write.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19080 we simplified the distribution/partitioning framework, and make all the join-like operators require `HashClusteredDistribution` from children. Unfortunately streaming join operator was missed.
This can cause wrong result. Think about
```
val input1 = MemoryStream[Int]
val input2 = MemoryStream[Int]
val df1 = input1.toDF.select('value as 'a, 'value * 2 as 'b)
val df2 = input2.toDF.select('value as 'a, 'value * 2 as 'b).repartition('b)
val joined = df1.join(df2, Seq("a", "b")).select('a)
```
The physical plan is
```
*(3) Project [a#5]
+- StreamingSymmetricHashJoin [a#5, b#6], [a#10, b#11], Inner, condition = [ leftOnly = null, rightOnly = null, both = null, full = null ], state info [ checkpoint = <unknown>, runId = 54e31fce-f055-4686-b75d-fcd2b076f8d8, opId = 0, ver = 0, numPartitions = 5], 0, state cleanup [ left = null, right = null ]
:- Exchange hashpartitioning(a#5, b#6, 5)
: +- *(1) Project [value#1 AS a#5, (value#1 * 2) AS b#6]
: +- StreamingRelation MemoryStream[value#1], [value#1]
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(b#11, 5)
+- *(2) Project [value#3 AS a#10, (value#3 * 2) AS b#11]
+- StreamingRelation MemoryStream[value#3], [value#3]
```
The left table is hash partitioned by `a, b`, while the right table is hash partitioned by `b`. This means, we may have a matching record that is in different partitions, which should be in the output but not.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21587 from cloud-fan/join.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Wrap the logical plan with a `AnalysisBarrier` for execution plan compilation in CacheManager, in order to avoid the plan being analyzed again.
## How was this patch tested?
Add one test in `DatasetCacheSuite`
Author: Maryann Xue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21602 from maryannxue/cache-mismatch.
When an output stage is retried, it's possible that tasks from the previous
attempt are still running. In that case, there would be a new task for the
same partition in the new attempt, and the coordinator would allow both
tasks to commit their output since it did not keep track of stage attempts.
The change adds more information to the stage state tracked by the coordinator,
so that only one task is allowed to commit the output in the above case.
The stage state in the coordinator is also maintained across stage retries,
so that a stray speculative task from a previous stage attempt is not allowed
to commit.
This also removes some code added in SPARK-18113 that allowed for duplicate
commit requests; with the RPC code used in Spark 2, that situation cannot
happen, so there is no need to handle it.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes#21577 from vanzin/SPARK-24552.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For the function ```def array_contains(column: Column, value: Any): Column ``` , if we pass the `value` parameter as a Column type, it will yield a runtime exception.
This PR proposes a pattern matching to detect if `value` is of type Column. If yes, it will use the .expr of the column, otherwise it will work as it used to.
Same thing for ```array_position, array_remove and element_at``` functions
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test modified to cover this code change.
Ping ueshin
Author: Chongguang LIU <chong@Chongguangs-MacBook-Pro.local>
Closes#21581 from chongguang/SPARK-24574.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to automatically convert a `Literal` with `Char` type to a `Literal` of `String` type. Currently, the following code:
```scala
val df = Seq("Amsterdam", "San Francisco", "London").toDF("city")
df.where($"city".contains('o')).show(false)
```
fails with the exception:
```
Unsupported literal type class java.lang.Character o
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unsupported literal type class java.lang.Character o
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Literal$.apply(literals.scala:78)
```
The PR fixes this issue by converting `char` to `string` of length `1`. I believe it makes sense to does not differentiate `char` and `string(1)` in _a unified, multi-language data platform_ like Spark which supports languages like Python/R.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Author: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Closes#21578 from MaxGekk/support-char-literals.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add array_distinct to remove duplicate value from the array.
## How was this patch tested?
Add unit tests
Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21050 from huaxingao/spark-23912.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As discussed [before](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19193#issuecomment-393726964), this PR prohibits window expressions inside WHERE and HAVING clauses.
## How was this patch tested?
This PR comes with a dedicated unit test.
Author: aokolnychyi <anton.okolnychyi@sap.com>
Closes#21580 from aokolnychyi/spark-24575.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch is removing invalid comment from SparkStrategies, given that TODO-like comment is no longer preferred one as the comment: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21388#issuecomment-396856235
Removing invalid comment will prevent contributors to spend their times which is not going to be merged.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Closes#21595 from HeartSaVioR/MINOR-remove-invalid-comment-on-spark-strategies.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change insert input schema type: "insertRelationType" -> "insertRelationType.asNullable", in order to avoid nullable being overridden.
## How was this patch tested?
Added one test in InsertSuite.
Author: Maryann Xue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Closes#21585 from maryannxue/spark-24583.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the micro-batches in the MicroBatchExecution is not exposed to the user through any public API. This was because we did not want to expose the micro-batches, so that all the APIs we expose, we can eventually support them in the Continuous engine. But now that we have better sense of buiding a ContinuousExecution, I am considering adding APIs which will run only the MicroBatchExecution. I have quite a few use cases where exposing the microbatch output as a dataframe is useful.
- Pass the output rows of each batch to a library that is designed only the batch jobs (example, uses many ML libraries need to collect() while learning).
- Reuse batch data sources for output whose streaming version does not exists (e.g. redshift data source).
- Writer the output rows to multiple places by writing twice for each batch. This is not the most elegant thing to do for multiple-output streaming queries but is likely to be better than running two streaming queries processing the same data twice.
The proposal is to add a method `foreachBatch(f: Dataset[T] => Unit)` to Scala/Java/Python `DataStreamWriter`.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21571 from tdas/foreachBatch.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, ReusedExchange and InMemoryTableScanExec only rewrite output partitioning if child's partitioning is HashPartitioning and do nothing for other partitioning, e.g., RangePartitioning. We should always rewrite it, otherwise, unnecessary shuffle could be introduced like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24556.
## How was this patch tested?
Add new tests.
Author: yucai <yyu1@ebay.com>
Closes#21564 from yucai/SPARK-24556.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
test("withColumn doesn't invalidate cached dataframe") in CachedTableSuite doesn't not work because:
The UDF is executed and test count incremented when "df.cache()" is called and the subsequent "df.collect()" has no effect on the test result.
This PR fixed this test and add another test for caching UDF.
## How was this patch tested?
Add new tests.
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Closes#21531 from icexelloss/fix-cache-test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21503, to completely move operator pushdown to the planner rule.
The code are mostly from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21319
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21574 from cloud-fan/followup.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When creating tuple expression encoders, we should give the serializer expressions of tuple items correct names, so we can have correct output schema when we use such tuple encoders.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#21576 from viirya/SPARK-24548.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added a new JSON option `dropFieldIfAllNull ` to ignore column of all null values or empty array/struct during JSON schema inference.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `JsonSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Closes#20929 from maropu/SPARK-23772.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Provide an option to limit number of rows in a MemorySink. Currently, MemorySink and MemorySinkV2 have unbounded size, meaning that if they're used on big data, they can OOM the stream. This change adds a maxMemorySinkRows option to limit how many rows MemorySink and MemorySinkV2 can hold. By default, they are still unbounded.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests.
Author: Mukul Murthy <mukul.murthy@databricks.com>
Closes#21559 from mukulmurthy/SPARK-24525.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes possible overflow in int add or multiply. In particular, their overflows in multiply are detected by [Spotbugs](https://spotbugs.github.io/)
The following assignments may cause overflow in right hand side. As a result, the result may be negative.
```
long = int * int
long = int + int
```
To avoid this problem, this PR performs cast from int to long in right hand side.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21481 from kiszk/SPARK-24452.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `foreach` for streaming queries in Python. Users will be able to specify their processing logic in two different ways.
- As a function that takes a row as input.
- As an object that has methods `open`, `process`, and `close` methods.
See the python docs in this PR for more details.
## How was this patch tested?
Added java and python unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21477 from tdas/SPARK-24396.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This removes the v2 optimizer rule for push-down and instead pushes filters and required columns when converting to a physical plan, as suggested by marmbrus. This makes the v2 relation cleaner because the output and filters do not change in the logical plan.
A side-effect of this change is that the stats from the logical (optimized) plan no longer reflect pushed filters and projection. This is a temporary state, until the planner gathers stats from the physical plan instead. An alternative to this approach is 9d3a11e68b.
The first commit was proposed in #21262. This PR replaces #21262.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Closes#21503 from rdblue/SPARK-24478-move-push-down-to-physical-conversion.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to support any DataType represented as DDL string for the from_json function. After the changes, it will be possible to specify `MapType` in SQL like:
```sql
select from_json('{"a":1, "b":2}', 'map<string, int>')
```
and in Scala (similar in other languages)
```scala
val in = Seq("""{"a": {"b": 1}}""").toDS()
val schema = "map<string, map<string, int>>"
val out = in.select(from_json($"value", schema, Map.empty[String, String]))
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added a couple sql tests and modified existing tests for Python and Scala. The former tests were modified because it is not imported for them in which format schema for `from_json` is provided.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21550 from MaxGekk/from_json-ddl-schema.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`EnsureRequirement` in its `reorder` method currently assumes that the same key appears only once in the join condition. This of course might not be the case, and when it is not satisfied, it returns a wrong plan which produces a wrong result of the query.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21529 from mgaido91/SPARK-24495.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IL4kJoKrZWeyIhklKUJqsW-yEN7V7aL05MmM65AYOfE/edit
Implement continuous shuffle write RDD for a single reader partition. (I don't believe any implementation changes are actually required for multiple reader partitions, but this PR is already very large, so I want to exclude those for now to keep the size down.)
## How was this patch tested?
new unit tests
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#21428 from jose-torres/writerTask.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If you construct catalyst trees using `scala.collection.immutable.Stream` you can run into situations where valid transformations do not seem to have any effect. There are two causes for this behavior:
- `Stream` is evaluated lazily. Note that default implementation will generally only evaluate a function for the first element (this makes testing a bit tricky).
- `TreeNode` and `QueryPlan` use side effects to detect if a tree has changed. Mapping over a stream is lazy and does not need to trigger this side effect. If this happens the node will invalidly assume that it did not change and return itself instead if the newly created node (this is for GC reasons).
This PR fixes this issue by forcing materialization on streams in `TreeNode` and `QueryPlan`.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests were added to `TreeNodeSuite` and `LogicalPlanSuite`. An integration test was added to the `PlannerSuite`
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#21539 from hvanhovell/SPARK-24500.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently a "StreamingQueryListener" can only be registered programatically. We could have a new config "spark.sql.streamingQueryListeners" similar to "spark.sql.queryExecutionListeners" and "spark.extraListeners" for users to register custom streaming listeners.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit test and running example programs.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Arun Mahadevan <arunm@apache.org>
Closes#21504 from arunmahadevan/SPARK-24480.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch measures and logs elapsed time for each operation which communicate with file system (mostly remote HDFS in production) in HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider to help investigating any latency issue.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Author: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Closes#21506 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-24485.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
TextSocketMicroBatchReader was no longer be compatible with netcat due to launching temporary reader for reading schema, and closing reader, and re-opening reader. While reliable socket server should be able to handle this without any issue, nc command normally can't handle multiple connections and simply exits when closing temporary reader.
This patch fixes TextSocketMicroBatchReader to be compatible with netcat again, via deferring opening socket to the first call of planInputPartitions() instead of constructor.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test which fails on current and succeeds with the patch. And also manually tested.
Author: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Closes#21497 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-24466.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables using a grouped aggregate pandas UDFs as window functions. The semantics is the same as using SQL aggregation function as window functions.
```
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf, PandasUDFType
>>> from pyspark.sql import Window
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame(
... [(1, 1.0), (1, 2.0), (2, 3.0), (2, 5.0), (2, 10.0)],
... ("id", "v"))
>>> pandas_udf("double", PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG)
... def mean_udf(v):
... return v.mean()
>>> w = Window.partitionBy('id')
>>> df.withColumn('mean_v', mean_udf(df['v']).over(w)).show()
+---+----+------+
| id| v|mean_v|
+---+----+------+
| 1| 1.0| 1.5|
| 1| 2.0| 1.5|
| 2| 3.0| 6.0|
| 2| 5.0| 6.0|
| 2|10.0| 6.0|
+---+----+------+
```
The scope of this PR is somewhat limited in terms of:
(1) Only supports unbounded window, which acts essentially as group by.
(2) Only supports aggregation functions, not "transform" like window functions (n -> n mapping)
Both of these are left as future work. Especially, (1) needs careful thinking w.r.t. how to pass rolling window data to python efficiently. (2) is a bit easier but does require more changes therefore I think it's better to leave it as a separate PR.
## How was this patch tested?
WindowPandasUDFTests
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Closes#21082 from icexelloss/SPARK-22239-window-udf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `map_from_arrays`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's `map`. Since SparkSQL already had a `map` function, we prepared the different name for this behavior.
This function returns returns a map from a pair of arrays for keys and values.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21258 from kiszk/SPARK-23933.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When user create a aggregator object in scala and pass the aggregator to Spark Dataset's agg() method, Spark's will initialize TypedAggregateExpression with the nodeName field as aggregator.getClass.getSimpleName. However, getSimpleName is not safe in scala environment, depending on how user creates the aggregator object. For example, if the aggregator class full qualified name is "com.my.company.MyUtils$myAgg$2$", the getSimpleName will throw java.lang.InternalError "Malformed class name". This has been reported in scalatest https://github.com/scalatest/scalatest/pull/1044 and discussed in many scala upstream jiras such as SI-8110, SI-5425.
To fix this issue, we follow the solution in https://github.com/scalatest/scalatest/pull/1044 to add safer version of getSimpleName as a util method, and TypedAggregateExpression will invoke this util method rather than getClass.getSimpleName.
## How was this patch tested?
added unit test
Author: Fangshi Li <fli@linkedin.com>
Closes#21276 from fangshil/SPARK-24216.
Signed-off-by: DylanGuedes <djmgguedesgmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Addition of arrays_zip function to spark sql functions.
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
Unit tests that checks if the results are correct.
Author: DylanGuedes <djmgguedes@gmail.com>
Closes#21045 from DylanGuedes/SPARK-23931.
no => no[t]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixing a typo.
## How was this patch tested?
Visual check of the docs.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Tom Saleeba <tom.saleeba@gmail.com>
Closes#21496 from tomsaleeba/patch-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`UnsafeRowSerializerSuite` calls `UnsafeProjection.create` which accesses `SQLConf.get`, while the current active SparkSession may already be stopped, and we may hit exception like this
```
sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: java.lang.IllegalStateException: LiveListenerBus is stopped.
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.LiveListenerBus.addToQueue(LiveListenerBus.scala:97)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.LiveListenerBus.addToStatusQueue(LiveListenerBus.scala:80)
at org.apache.spark.sql.internal.SharedState.<init>(SharedState.scala:93)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$sharedState$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$sharedState$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:120)
at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sharedState$lzycompute(SparkSession.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sharedState(SparkSession.scala:119)
at org.apache.spark.sql.internal.BaseSessionStateBuilder.build(BaseSessionStateBuilder.scala:286)
at org.apache.spark.sql.test.TestSparkSession.sessionState$lzycompute(TestSQLContext.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.sql.test.TestSparkSession.sessionState(TestSQLContext.scala:41)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$1$$anonfun$apply$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$1$$anonfun$apply$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:95)
at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:146)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:94)
at org.apache.spark.sql.internal.SQLConf$.get(SQLConf.scala:126)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallback.createObject(CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallback.scala:54)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeProjection$.create(Projection.scala:157)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeProjection$.create(Projection.scala:150)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$UnsafeRowSerializerSuite$$unsafeRowConverter(UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.scala:54)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$UnsafeRowSerializerSuite$$toUnsafeRow(UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeRowSerializerSuite$$anonfun$2.apply(UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.scala:63)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeRowSerializerSuite$$anonfun$2.apply(UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.scala:60)
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21518 from cloud-fan/test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
when the length of pre-shuffle's partitions is 0, the length of post-shuffle's partitions should be 0 instead of spark.sql.shuffle.partitions.
## How was this patch tested?
ExchangeCoordinator converted a pre-shuffle that partitions is 0 to a post-shuffle that partitions is 0 instead of one that partitions is spark.sql.shuffle.partitions.
Author: liutang123 <liutang123@yeah.net>
Closes#19364 from liutang123/SPARK-22144.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SPARK-22036 we introduced the possibility to allow precision loss in arithmetic operations (according to the SQL standard). The implementation was drawn from Hive's one, where Decimals with a negative scale are not allowed in the operations.
The PR handles the case when the scale is negative, removing the assertion that it is not.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21499 from mgaido91/SPARK-24468.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update documentation for `isInCollection` API to clealy explain the "auto-casting" of elements if their types are different.
## How was this patch tested?
No-Op
Author: Thiruvasakan Paramasivan <thiru@apple.com>
Closes#21519 from trvskn/sql-doc-update.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
support bucket pruning when filtering on a single bucketed column on the following predicates -
EqualTo, EqualNullSafe, In, And/Or predicates
## How was this patch tested?
refactored unit tests to test the above.
based on gatorsmile work in e3c75c6398
Author: Asher Saban <asaban@palantir.com>
Author: asaban <asaban@palantir.com>
Closes#20915 from sabanas/filter-prune-buckets.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The error occurs when we are recovering from a failure in a no-data batch (say X) that has been planned (i.e. written to offset log) but not executed (i.e. not written to commit log). Upon recovery the following sequence of events happen.
1. `MicroBatchExecution.populateStartOffsets` sets `currentBatchId` to X. Since there was no data in the batch, the `availableOffsets` is same as `committedOffsets`, so `isNewDataAvailable` is `false`.
2. When `MicroBatchExecution.constructNextBatch` is called, ideally it should immediately return true because the next batch has already been constructed. However, the check of whether the batch has been constructed was `if (isNewDataAvailable) return true`. Since the planned batch is a no-data batch, it escaped this check and proceeded to plan the same batch X *once again*.
The solution is to have an explicit flag that signifies whether a batch has already been constructed or not. `populateStartOffsets` is going to set the flag appropriately.
## How was this patch tested?
new unit test
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21491 from tdas/SPARK-24453.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR explicitly prohibits window functions inside aggregates. Currently, this will cause StackOverflow during analysis. See PR #19193 for previous discussion.
## How was this patch tested?
This PR comes with a dedicated unit test.
Author: aokolnychyi <anton.okolnychyi@sap.com>
Closes#21473 from aokolnychyi/fix-stackoverflow-window-funcs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for date `extract` function:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR FROM TIMESTAMP '2000-12-16 12:21:13');
2000
```
Supported field same as [Hive](https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/rel/release-2.3.3/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/IdentifiersParser.g#L308-L316): `YEAR`, `QUARTER`, `MONTH`, `WEEK`, `DAY`, `DAYOFWEEK`, `HOUR`, `MINUTE`, `SECOND`.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21479 from wangyum/SPARK-23903.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently column names of headers in CSV files are not checked against provided schema of CSV data. It could cause errors like showed in the [SPARK-23786](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23786) and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894#issuecomment-375957777. I introduced new CSV option - `enforceSchema`. If it is enabled (by default `true`), Spark forcibly applies provided or inferred schema to CSV files. In that case, CSV headers are ignored and not checked against the schema. If `enforceSchema` is set to `false`, additional checks can be performed. For example, if column in CSV header and in the schema have different ordering, the following exception is thrown:
```
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: CSV file header does not contain the expected fields
Header: depth, temperature
Schema: temperature, depth
CSV file: marina.csv
```
## How was this patch tested?
The changes were tested by existing tests of CSVSuite and by 2 new tests.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Author: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Closes#20894 from MaxGekk/check-column-names.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
bring back https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21443
This is a different approach: just change the check to count distinct columns with `toSet`
## How was this patch tested?
a new test to verify the planner behavior.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21487 from cloud-fan/back.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Compute the thresholdBatchId to purge metadata based on current committed epoch instead of currentBatchId in CP mode to avoid cleaning all the committed metadata in some case as described in the jira [SPARK-24351](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24351).
## How was this patch tested?
Add new unit test.
Author: Huang Tengfei <tengfei.h@gmail.com>
Closes#21400 from ivoson/branch-cp-meta.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add array_remove to remove all elements that equal element from array
## How was this patch tested?
add unit tests
Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21069 from huaxingao/spark-23920.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Refactor ExecuteWriteTask in FileFormatWriter to reduce common logic and improve readability.
After the change, callers only need to call `commit()` or `abort` at the end of task.
Also there is less code in `SingleDirectoryWriteTask` and `DynamicPartitionWriteTask`.
Definitions of related classes are moved to a new file, and `ExecuteWriteTask` is renamed to `FileFormatDataWriter`.
2. As per code style guide: https://github.com/databricks/scala-style-guide#traversal-and-zipwithindex , we avoid using `for` for looping in [FileFormatWriter](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21381/files#diff-3b69eb0963b68c65cfe8075f8a42e850L536) , or `foreach` in [WriteToDataSourceV2Exec](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21381/files#diff-6fbe10db766049a395bae2e785e9d56eL119).
In such critical code path, using `while` is good for performance.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit test.
I tried the microbenchmark in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21409
| Workload | Before changes(Best/Avg Time(ms)) | After changes(Best/Avg Time(ms)) |
| --- | --- | -- |
|Output Single Int Column| 2018 / 2043 | 2096 / 2236 |
|Output Single Double Column| 1978 / 2043 | 2013 / 2018 |
|Output Int and String Column| 6332 / 6706 | 6162 / 6298 |
|Output Partitions| 4458 / 5094 | 3792 / 4008 |
|Output Buckets| 5695 / 6102 | 5120 / 5154 |
Also a microbenchmark on my laptop for general comparison among while/foreach/for :
```
class Writer {
var sum = 0L
def write(l: Long): Unit = sum += l
}
def testWhile(iterator: Iterator[Long]): Long = {
val w = new Writer
while (iterator.hasNext) {
w.write(iterator.next())
}
w.sum
}
def testForeach(iterator: Iterator[Long]): Long = {
val w = new Writer
iterator.foreach(w.write)
w.sum
}
def testFor(iterator: Iterator[Long]): Long = {
val w = new Writer
for (x <- iterator) {
w.write(x)
}
w.sum
}
val data = 0L to 100000000L
val start = System.nanoTime
(0 to 10).foreach(_ => testWhile(data.iterator))
println("benchmark while: " + (System.nanoTime - start)/1000000)
val start2 = System.nanoTime
(0 to 10).foreach(_ => testForeach(data.iterator))
println("benchmark foreach: " + (System.nanoTime - start2)/1000000)
val start3 = System.nanoTime
(0 to 10).foreach(_ => testForeach(data.iterator))
println("benchmark for: " + (System.nanoTime - start3)/1000000)
```
Benchmark result:
`while`: 15401 ms
`foreach`: 43034 ms
`for`: 41279 ms
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21381 from gengliangwang/refactorExecuteWriteTask.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the masking function as they are described in Hive's documentation: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+UDF#LanguageManualUDF-DataMaskingFunctions.
This means that only `string`s are accepted as parameter for the masking functions.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21246 from mgaido91/SPARK-23901.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed an issue when having multiple distinct aggregations having the same argument set, e.g.,
```
scala>: paste
val df = sql(
s"""SELECT corr(DISTINCT x, y), corr(DISTINCT y, x), count(*)
| FROM (VALUES (1, 1), (2, 2), (2, 2)) t(x, y)
""".stripMargin)
java.lang.RuntimeException
You hit a query analyzer bug. Please report your query to Spark user mailing list.
```
The root cause is that `RewriteDistinctAggregates` can't detect multiple distinct aggregations if they have the same argument set. This pr modified code so that `RewriteDistinctAggregates` could count the number of aggregate expressions with `isDistinct=true`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `DataFrameAggregateSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21443 from maropu/SPARK-24369.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Data Source write benchmark. So that it would be easier to measure the writer performance.
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21409 from gengliangwang/parquetWriteBenchmark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implemented **`isInCollection `** in DataFrame API for both Scala and Java, so users can do
```scala
val profileDF = Seq(
Some(1), Some(2), Some(3), Some(4),
Some(5), Some(6), Some(7), None
).toDF("profileID")
val validUsers: Seq[Any] = Seq(6, 7.toShort, 8L, "3")
val result = profileDF.withColumn("isValid", $"profileID". isInCollection(validUsers))
result.show(10)
"""
+---------+-------+
|profileID|isValid|
+---------+-------+
| 1| false|
| 2| false|
| 3| true|
| 4| false|
| 5| false|
| 6| true|
| 7| true|
| null| null|
+---------+-------+
""".stripMargin
```
## How was this patch tested?
Several unit tests are added.
Author: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Closes#21416 from dbtsai/optimize-set.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should not stop users from calling `getActiveSession` and `getDefaultSession` in executors. To not break the existing behaviors, we should simply return None.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21436 from gatorsmile/followUpSPARK-24250.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Random.nextString` is good for generating random string data, but it's not proper for directory name prefix in `Utils.createDirectory(tempDir, Random.nextString(10))`. This PR uses more safe directory namePrefix.
```scala
scala> scala.util.Random.nextString(10)
res0: String = 馨쭔ᎰႻ穚䃈兩㻞藑並
```
```scala
StateStoreRDDSuite:
- versioning and immutability
- recovering from files
- usage with iterators - only gets and only puts
- preferred locations using StateStoreCoordinator *** FAILED ***
java.io.IOException: Failed to create a temp directory (under /.../spark/sql/core/target/tmp/StateStoreRDDSuite8712796397908632676) after 10 attempts!
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.createDirectory(Utils.scala:295)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.StateStoreRDDSuite$$anonfun$13$$anonfun$apply$6.apply(StateStoreRDDSuite.scala:152)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.StateStoreRDDSuite$$anonfun$13$$anonfun$apply$6.apply(StateStoreRDDSuite.scala:149)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.package$.quietly(package.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.StateStoreRDDSuite$$anonfun$13.apply(StateStoreRDDSuite.scala:149)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.StateStoreRDDSuite$$anonfun$13.apply(StateStoreRDDSuite.scala:149)
...
- distributed test *** FAILED ***
java.io.IOException: Failed to create a temp directory (under /.../spark/sql/core/target/tmp/StateStoreRDDSuite8712796397908632676) after 10 attempts!
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.createDirectory(Utils.scala:295)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing tests.StateStoreRDDSuite:
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#21446 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-19613.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we create a `RelationalGroupedDataset` or a `KeyValueGroupedDataset` we set its child to the `logicalPlan` of the `DataFrame` we need to aggregate. Since the `logicalPlan` is already analyzed, we should not analyze it again. But this happens when the new plan of the aggregate is analyzed.
The current behavior in most of the cases is likely to produce no harm, but in other cases re-analyzing an analyzed plan can change it, since the analysis is not idempotent. This can cause issues like the one described in the JIRA (missing to find a cached plan).
The PR adds an `AnalysisBarrier` to the `logicalPlan` which is used as child of `RelationalGroupedDataset` or a `KeyValueGroupedDataset`.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21432 from mgaido91/SPARK-24373.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is a race condition of closing Arrow VectorSchemaRoot and Allocator in the writer thread of ArrowPythonRunner.
The race results in memory leak exception when closing the allocator. This patch removes the closing routine from the TaskCompletionListener and make the writer thread responsible for cleaning up the Arrow memory.
This issue be reproduced by this test:
```
def test_memory_leak(self):
from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf, col, PandasUDFType, array, lit, explode
# Have all data in a single executor thread so it can trigger the race condition easier
with self.sql_conf({'spark.sql.shuffle.partitions': 1}):
df = self.spark.range(0, 1000)
df = df.withColumn('id', array([lit(i) for i in range(0, 300)])) \
.withColumn('id', explode(col('id'))) \
.withColumn('v', array([lit(i) for i in range(0, 1000)]))
pandas_udf(df.schema, PandasUDFType.GROUPED_MAP)
def foo(pdf):
xxx
return pdf
result = df.groupby('id').apply(foo)
with QuietTest(self.sc):
with self.assertRaises(py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError) as context:
result.count()
self.assertTrue('Memory leaked' not in str(context.exception))
```
Note: Because of the race condition, the test case cannot reproduce the issue reliably so it's not added to test cases.
## How was this patch tested?
Because of the race condition, the bug cannot be unit test easily. So far it has only happens on large amount of data. This is currently tested manually.
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Closes#21397 from icexelloss/SPARK-24334-arrow-memory-leak.
