## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor SortBenchmark to use main method.
Generate benchmark result:
```
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.SortBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22495 from yucai/SPARK-25486.
Authored-by: yucai <yyu1@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `CompressionSchemeBenchmark` to use main method.
Generate benchmark result:
```sh
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.columnar.compression.CompressionSchemeBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22486 from wangyum/SPARK-25478.
Lead-authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor PrimitiveArrayBenchmark to use main method and print the output as a separate file.
Run blow command to generate benchmark results:
```
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "sql/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.execution.benchmark.PrimitiveArrayBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests.
Closes#22497 from seancxmao/SPARK-25487.
Authored-by: seancxmao <seancxmao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix three things in `FilterPushdownBenchmark`.
**1. Use the same memory assumption.**
The following configurations are used in ORC and Parquet.
- Memory buffer for writing
- parquet.block.size (default: 128MB)
- orc.stripe.size (default: 64MB)
- Compression chunk size
- parquet.page.size (default: 1MB)
- orc.compress.size (default: 256KB)
SPARK-24692 used 1MB, the default value of `parquet.page.size`, for `parquet.block.size` and `orc.stripe.size`. But, it missed to match `orc.compress.size`. So, the current benchmark shows the result from ORC with 256KB memory for compression and Parquet with 1MB. To compare correctly, we need to be consistent.
**2. Dictionary encoding should not be enforced for all cases.**
SPARK-24206 enforced dictionary encoding for all test cases. This PR recovers the default behavior in general and enforces dictionary encoding only in case of `prepareStringDictTable`.
**3. Generate test result on AWS r3.xlarge**
SPARK-24206 generated the result on AWS in order to reproduce and compare easily. This PR also aims to update the result on the same machine again in the same reason. Specifically, AWS r3.xlarge with Instance Store is used.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual. Enable the test cases and run `FilterPushdownBenchmark` on `AWS r3.xlarge`. It takes about 4 hours 15 minutes.
Closes#22427 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-25438.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In both ORC data sources, `createFilter` function has exponential time complexity due to its skewed filter tree generation. This PR aims to improve it by using new `buildTree` function.
**REPRODUCE**
```scala
// Create and read 1 row table with 1000 columns
sql("set spark.sql.orc.filterPushdown=true")
val selectExpr = (1 to 1000).map(i => s"id c$i")
spark.range(1).selectExpr(selectExpr: _*).write.mode("overwrite").orc("/tmp/orc")
print(s"With 0 filters, ")
spark.time(spark.read.orc("/tmp/orc").count)
// Increase the number of filters
(20 to 30).foreach { width =>
val whereExpr = (1 to width).map(i => s"c$i is not null").mkString(" and ")
print(s"With $width filters, ")
spark.time(spark.read.orc("/tmp/orc").where(whereExpr).count)
}
```
**RESULT**
```scala
With 0 filters, Time taken: 653 ms
With 20 filters, Time taken: 962 ms
With 21 filters, Time taken: 1282 ms
With 22 filters, Time taken: 1982 ms
With 23 filters, Time taken: 3855 ms
With 24 filters, Time taken: 6719 ms
With 25 filters, Time taken: 12669 ms
With 26 filters, Time taken: 25032 ms
With 27 filters, Time taken: 49585 ms
With 28 filters, Time taken: 98980 ms // over 1 min 38 seconds
With 29 filters, Time taken: 198368 ms // over 3 mins
With 30 filters, Time taken: 393744 ms // over 6 mins
```
**AFTER THIS PR**
```scala
With 0 filters, Time taken: 774 ms
With 20 filters, Time taken: 601 ms
With 21 filters, Time taken: 399 ms
With 22 filters, Time taken: 679 ms
With 23 filters, Time taken: 363 ms
With 24 filters, Time taken: 342 ms
With 25 filters, Time taken: 336 ms
With 26 filters, Time taken: 352 ms
With 27 filters, Time taken: 322 ms
With 28 filters, Time taken: 302 ms
With 29 filters, Time taken: 307 ms
With 30 filters, Time taken: 301 ms
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins with newly added test cases.
Closes#22313 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-25306.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support Decimal type push down to the parquet data sources.
The Decimal comparator used is: [`BINARY_AS_SIGNED_INTEGER_COMPARATOR`](c6764c4a08/parquet-column/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/schema/PrimitiveComparator.java (L224-L292)).
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and manual tests.
**manual tests**:
```scala
spark.range(10000000).selectExpr("id", "cast(id as decimal(9)) as d1", "cast(id as decimal(9, 2)) as d2", "cast(id as decimal(18)) as d3", "cast(id as decimal(18, 4)) as d4", "cast(id as decimal(38)) as d5", "cast(id as decimal(38, 18)) as d6").coalesce(1).write.option("parquet.block.size", 1048576).parquet("/tmp/spark/parquet/decimal")
val df = spark.read.parquet("/tmp/spark/parquet/decimal/")
spark.sql("set spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown.decimal=true")
// Only read about 1 MB data
df.filter("d2 = 10000").show
// Only read about 1 MB data
df.filter("d4 = 10000").show
spark.sql("set spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown.decimal=false")
// Read 174.3 MB data
df.filter("d2 = 10000").show
// Read 174.3 MB data
df.filter("d4 = 10000").show
```
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21556 from wangyum/SPARK-24549.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Timestamp` support pushdown to parquet data source.
Only `TIMESTAMP_MICROS` and `TIMESTAMP_MILLIS` support push down.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and benchmark tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21741 from wangyum/SPARK-24718.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The original pr is: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18424
Add a new optimizer rule to convert an IN predicate to an equivalent Parquet filter and add `spark.sql.parquet.pushdown.inFilterThreshold` to control limit thresholds. Different data types have different limit thresholds, this is a copy of data for reference:
Type | limit threshold
-- | --
string | 370
int | 210
long | 285
double | 270
float | 220
decimal | Won't provide better performance before [SPARK-24549](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24549)
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and manual tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21603 from wangyum/SPARK-17091.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refer to the [`WideSchemaBenchmark`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v2.3.1/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/WideSchemaBenchmark.scala) update `FilterPushdownBenchmark`:
1. Write the result to `benchmarks/FilterPushdownBenchmark-results.txt` for easy maintenance.
2. Add more benchmark case: `StringStartsWith`, `Decimal`, `InSet -> InFilters` and `tinyint`.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21677 from wangyum/SPARK-24692.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
the `catalogString` for `ArrayType` and `MapType` currently calls the `simpleString` method on its children. This is a problem when the child is a struct, the `struct.simpleString` implementation truncates the number of fields it shows (25 at max). This breaks the generation of a proper `catalogString`, and has shown to cause errors while writing to Hive.
This PR fixes this by providing proper `catalogString` implementations for `ArrayData` or `MapData`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added testing for `catalogString` to `DataTypeSuite`.
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#14938 from hvanhovell/SPARK-17335.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These were not updated after performance improvements. To make updating them easier, I also moved the results from inline comments out into a file, which is auto-generated when the benchmark is re-run.
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes#13607 from ericl/sc-3538.
