### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR modifies the `ExtractPythonUDFs` rule to deduplicate deterministic PythonUDF calls.
Before this PR the dataframe: `df.withColumn("c", batchedPythonUDF(col("a"))).withColumn("d", col("c"))` has the plan:
```
*(1) Project [value#1 AS a#4, pythonUDF1#15 AS c#7, pythonUDF1#15 AS d#10]
+- BatchEvalPython [dummyUDF(value#1), dummyUDF(value#1)], [pythonUDF0#14, pythonUDF1#15]
+- LocalTableScan [value#1]
```
After this PR the deterministic PythonUDF calls are deduplicated:
```
*(1) Project [value#1 AS a#4, pythonUDF0#14 AS c#7, pythonUDF0#14 AS d#10]
+- BatchEvalPython [dummyUDF(value#1)], [pythonUDF0#14]
+- LocalTableScan [value#1]
```
### Why are the changes needed?
To fix a performance issue.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
New and existing UTs.
Closes#30203 from peter-toth/SPARK-33303-deduplicate-deterministic-udf-calls.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After #30097, all rules are using `SparkSession.active` to get `SQLConf`
and `SparkSession`. But in AQE, when applying the rules for the initial plan,
we should use the spark session in AQE context.
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix potential problem caused by using the wrong spark session
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existing ut
Closes#30294 from linhongliu-db/SPARK-33140-followup.
Authored-by: Linhong Liu <linhong.liu@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr add support bucket pruning on `IsNaN` predicate.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve query performance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30291 from wangyum/SPARK-33385.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes `DataFrameWriterV2` to create query plans with `UnresolvedRelation` and leave the table resolution work to the analyzer.
### Why are the changes needed?
Table resolution work should be done by the analyzer. After this PR, the behavior is more consistent between different APIs (DataFrameWriter, DataFrameWriterV2 and SQL). See the next section for behavior changes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
1. writes to a temp view of v2 relation: previously it fails with table not found exception, now it works if the v2 relation is writable. This is consistent with `DataFrameWriter` and SQL INSERT.
2. writes to other temp views: previously it fails with table not found exception, now it fails with a more explicit error message, saying that writing to a temp view of non-v2-relation is not allowed.
3. writes to a view: previously it fails with table not writable error, now it fails with a more explicit error message, saying that writing to a view is not allowed.
4. writes to a v1 table: previously it fails with table not writable error, now it fails with a more explicit error message, saying that writing to a v1 table is not allowed. (We can allow it later, by falling back to v1 command)
### How was this patch tested?
new tests
Closes#29970 from cloud-fan/refactor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently in JDBCTableCatalog, we ignore the table options when creating table.
```
// TODO (SPARK-32405): Apply table options while creating tables in JDBC Table Catalog
if (!properties.isEmpty) {
logWarning("Cannot create JDBC table with properties, these properties will be " +
"ignored: " + properties.asScala.map { case (k, v) => s"$k=$v" }.mkString("[", ", ", "]"))
}
```
### Why are the changes needed?
need to apply the table options when we create table
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
add new test
Closes#30154 from huaxingao/table_options.
Authored-by: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `RenameBasedFSDataOutputStream.cancel`, we do two things: closing underlying stream and delete temporary file, in a single try/catch block. Closing `OutputStream` could possibly throw `IOException` so we possibly missing deleting temporary file.
This patch proposes to delete temporary even underlying stream throwing error.
### Why are the changes needed?
To avoid leaving temporary files during canceling writing in `RenameBasedFSDataOutputStream`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30290 from viirya/SPARK-33384.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are two similar compilation warnings about procedure-like declaration in Scala 2.13:
```
[WARNING] [Warn] /spark/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiver.scala:70: procedure syntax is deprecated for constructors: add `=`, as in method definition
```
and
```
[WARNING] [Warn] /spark/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerDecommissioner.scala:211: procedure syntax is deprecated: instead, add `: Unit =` to explicitly declare `run`'s return type
```
this pr is the first part to resolve SPARK-33352：
- For constructors method definition add `=` to convert to function syntax
- For without `return type` methods definition add `: Unit =` to convert to function syntax
### Why are the changes needed?
Eliminate compilation warnings in Scala 2.13 and this change should be compatible with Scala 2.12
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins or GitHub Action
Closes#30255 from LuciferYang/SPARK-29392-FOLLOWUP.1.
Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Javadocs updated for the encoder to include maps as a collection type
### Why are the changes needed?
The javadocs were not updated with fix SPARK-16706
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, the javadocs are updated
### How was this patch tested?
sbt was run to ensure it meets scalastyle
Closes#30274 from hannahkamundson/SPARK-32860.
Lead-authored-by: Hannah Amundson <amundson.hannah@heb.com>
Co-authored-by: Hannah <48397717+hannahkamundson@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The changes in [SPARK-32501 Inconsistent NULL conversions to strings](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32501) introduced some behavior that I'd like to clean up a bit.
Here's sample code to illustrate the behavior I'd like to clean up:
```scala
val rows = Seq[String](null)
.toDF("value")
.withColumn("struct1", struct('value as "value1"))
.withColumn("struct2", struct('value as "value1", 'value as "value2"))
.withColumn("array1", array('value))
.withColumn("array2", array('value, 'value))
// Show the DataFrame using the "first" codepath.
rows.show(truncate=false)
+-----+-------+-------------+------+--------+
|value|struct1|struct2 |array1|array2 |
+-----+-------+-------------+------+--------+
|null |{ null}|{ null, null}|[] |[, null]|
+-----+-------+-------------+------+--------+
// Write the DataFrame to disk, then read it back and show it to trigger the "codegen" code path:
rows.write.parquet("rows")
spark.read.parquet("rows").show(truncate=false)
+-----+-------+-------------+-------+-------------+
|value|struct1|struct2 |array1 |array2 |
+-----+-------+-------------+-------+-------------+
|null |{ null}|{ null, null}|[ null]|[ null, null]|
+-----+-------+-------------+-------+-------------+
```
Notice:
1. If the first element of a struct is null, it is printed with a leading space (e.g. "\{ null\}"). I think it's preferable to print it without the leading space (e.g. "\{null\}"). This is consistent with how non-null values are printed inside a struct.
2. If the first element of an array is null, it is not printed at all in the first code path, and the "codegen" code path prints it with a leading space. I think both code paths should be consistent and print it without a leading space (e.g. "[null]").
The desired result of this PR is to product the following output via both code paths:
```
+-----+-------+------------+------+------------+
|value|struct1|struct2 |array1|array2 |
+-----+-------+------------+------+------------+
|null |{null} |{null, null}|[null]|[null, null]|
+-----+-------+------------+------+------------+
```
This contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license.
### Why are the changes needed?
To correct errors and inconsistencies in how DataFrame.show() displays nulls inside arrays and structs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. This PR changes what is printed out by DataFrame.show().
### How was this patch tested?
I added new test cases in CastSuite.scala to cover the cases addressed by this PR.
Closes#30189 from stwhit/show_nulls.
Authored-by: Stuart White <stuart.white1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to introduce the `purge` option in `TableCatalog.dropTable` so that v2 catalogs can use the option if needed.
Related discussion: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30079#discussion_r510594110
### Why are the changes needed?
Spark DDL supports passing the purge option to `DROP TABLE` command. However, the option is not used (ignored) for v2 catalogs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces a new API in `TableCatalog`.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a test.
Closes#30267 from imback82/purge_table.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Override the default SQL strings for:
ALTER TABLE RENAME COLUMN
ALTER TABLE UPDATE COLUMN NULLABILITY
in the following MsSQLServer JDBC dialect according to official documentation.
Write MsSqlServer integration tests for JDBC.
### Why are the changes needed?
To add the support for alter table when interacting with MSSql Server.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
added tests
Closes#30038 from ScrapCodes/mssql-dialect.
Authored-by: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Rename `OffsetWindowSpec` to `OffsetWindowFunction`, as it's the base class for all offset based window functions.
2. Refine and add more comments.
3. Remove `isRelative` as it's useless.
### Why are the changes needed?
code refinement
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#30261 from cloud-fan/window.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes incorrect JIRA ids in `Analyzer.scala` introduced by SPARK-31670 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28490)
```scala
- // SPARK-31607: Resolve Struct field in selectedGroupByExprs/groupByExprs and aggregations
+ // SPARK-31670: Resolve Struct field in selectedGroupByExprs/groupByExprs and aggregations
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Fix the wrong information.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
This is a comment change. Manually review.
Closes#30269 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-31670-MINOR.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removing duplicated code in `ResolveOutputRelation`, by adding `V2WriteCommand.withNewQuery`
### Why are the changes needed?
code cleanup
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#30264 from cloud-fan/ds-minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix a small bug in `V2WriteCommand.resolved`. It should always require the `table` and `query` to be resolved.
### Why are the changes needed?
To prevent potential bugs that we skip resolve the input query.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
a new test
Closes#30265 from cloud-fan/ds-minor-2.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There's a concept of 'read-only' and 'read+write' state store in Spark which is defined "implicitly". Spark doesn't prevent write for 'read-only' state store; Spark just assumes read-only stateful operator will not modify the state store. Given it's not defined explicitly, the instance of state store has to be implemented as 'read+write' even it's being used as 'read-only', which sometimes brings confusion.
For example, abort() in HDFSBackedStateStore - d38f816748/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala (L143-L155)
The comment sounds as if statement works differently between 'read-only' and 'read+write', but that's not true as both state store has state initialized as UPDATING (no difference). So 'read-only' state also creates the temporary file, initializes output streams to write to temporary file, closes output streams, and finally deletes the temporary file. This unnecessary operations are being done per batch/partition.
This patch explicitly defines 'read-only' StateStore, and enables state store provider to create 'read-only' StateStore instance if requested. Relevant code paths are modified, as well as 'read-only' StateStore implementation for HDFSBackedStateStore is introduced. The new implementation gets rid of unnecessary operations explained above.
In point of backward-compatibility view, the only thing being changed in public API side is `StateStoreProvider`. The trait `StateStoreProvider` has to be changed to allow requesting 'read-only' StateStore; this patch adds default implementation which leverages 'read+write' StateStore but wrapping with 'write-protected' StateStore instance, so that custom providers don't need to change their code to reflect the change. But if the providers can optimize for read-only workload, they'll be happy to make a change.
Please note that this patch makes ReadOnlyStateStore extend StateStore and being referred as StateStore, as StateStore is being used in so many places and it's not easy to support both traits if we differentiate them. So unfortunately these write methods are still exposed for read-only state; it just throws UnsupportedOperationException.
### Why are the changes needed?
The new API opens the chance to optimize read-only state store instance compared with read+write state store instance. HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider is modified to provide read-only version of state store which doesn't deal with temporary file as well as state machine.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Clearly "no" for most end users, and also "no" for custom state store providers as it doesn't touch trait `StateStore` as well as provides default implementation for added method in trait `StateStoreProvider`.
### How was this patch tested?
Modified UT. Existing UTs ensure the change doesn't break anything.
Closes#26935 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-30294.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix `semanticEquals` works correctly on `GetMapValue` expressions having literal maps with `ArrayBasedMapData` and `GenericArrayData`.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is a regression from Apache Spark 1.6.x.
```scala
scala> sc.version
res1: String = 1.6.3
scala> sqlContext.sql("SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY map('k1', 'v1')[k]").show
+---+
|_c0|
+---+
| v1|
+---+
```
Apache Spark 2.x ~ 3.0.1 raise`RuntimeException` for the following queries.
```sql
CREATE TABLE t USING ORC AS SELECT map('k1', 'v1') m, 'k1' k
SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY 1
SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY map('k1', 'v1')[k]
SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] a FROM t GROUP BY a
```
**BEFORE**
```scala
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Couldn't find k#3 in [keys: [k1], values: [v1][k#3]#6]
at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:79)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:52)
```
**AFTER**
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY 1;
v1
Time taken: 1.278 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] FROM t GROUP BY map('k1', 'v1')[k];
v1
Time taken: 0.313 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
spark-sql> SELECT map('k1', 'v1')[k] a FROM t GROUP BY a;
v1
Time taken: 0.265 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs with the newly added test case.
Closes#30246 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-33338.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite` to, by default, use a standard temporary directory to store the Spark binaries that it localizes. It additionally adds a new System property, `spark.test.cache-dir`, which can be used to define a static location into which the Spark binary will be localized to allow for sharing between test executions. If the System property is used, the downloaded binaries won't be deleted after the test runs.
### Why are the changes needed?
In SPARK-22356 (PR #19579), the `sparkTestingDir` used by `HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite` became hard-coded to enable re-use of the downloaded Spark tarball between test executions:
```
// For local test, you can set `sparkTestingDir` to a static value like `/tmp/test-spark`, to
// avoid downloading Spark of different versions in each run.
private val sparkTestingDir = new File("/tmp/test-spark")
```
However this doesn't work, since it gets deleted every time:
```
override def afterAll(): Unit = {
try {
Utils.deleteRecursively(wareHousePath)
Utils.deleteRecursively(tmpDataDir)
Utils.deleteRecursively(sparkTestingDir)
} finally {
super.afterAll()
}
}
```
It's bad that we're hard-coding to a `/tmp` directory, as in some cases this is not the proper place to store temporary files. We're not currently making any good use of it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Developer-facing changes only, as this is in a test.
### How was this patch tested?
The test continues to execute as expected.
Closes#30122 from xkrogen/xkrogen-SPARK-33214-hiveexternalversioncatalogsuite-fix.
Authored-by: Erik Krogen <xkrogen@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to migrate `ANALYZE TABLE` and `ANALYZE TABLE ... FOR COLUMNS` to use `UnresolvedTableOrView` to resolve the table/view identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).
Note that `ANALYZE TABLE` is not supported for v2 tables.
### Why are the changes needed?
The changes allow consistent resolution behavior when resolving the table/view identifier. For example, the following is the current behavior:
```scala
sql("create temporary view t as select 1")
sql("create database db")
sql("create table db.t using csv as select 1")
sql("use db")
sql("ANALYZE TABLE t compute statistics") // Succeeds
```
With this change, ANALYZE TABLE above fails with the following:
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: t is a temp view not table or permanent view.; line 1 pos 0
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.package$AnalysisErrorAt.failAnalysis(package.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveTempViews$$anonfun$apply$7.$anonfun$applyOrElse$40(Analyzer.scala:872)
at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:230)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveTempViews$$anonfun$apply$7.applyOrElse(Analyzer.scala:870)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveTempViews$$anonfun$apply$7.applyOrElse(Analyzer.scala:856)
```
, which is expected since temporary view is resolved first and ANALYZE TABLE doesn't support a temporary view.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
After this PR, `ANALYZE TABLE t` is resolved to a temp view `t` instead of table `db.t`.
### How was this patch tested?
Updated existing tests.
Closes#30229 from imback82/parse_v1table.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add query.resolved before convert hive relation.
### Why are the changes needed?
For better error msg.
```
CREATE TABLE t STORED AS PARQUET AS
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT c3 FROM (
SELECT c1, c2 from values(1,2) t(c1, c2)
)
)
```
Before this PR, we get such error msg
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.UnresolvedException: Invalid call to toAttribute on unresolved object, tree: *
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Star.toAttribute(unresolved.scala:244)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.Project$$anonfun$output$1.apply(basicLogicalOperators.scala:52)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.Project$$anonfun$output$1.apply(basicLogicalOperators.scala:52)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, error msg changed.
### How was this patch tested?
Add test.
Closes#30230 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33323.
Authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Rename `TableWriteExec` in `WriteToDataSourceV2Exec.scala` to `TableWriteExecHelper`.
### Why are the changes needed?
See [discussion](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30193#discussion_r516412653). The former is too general.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#30235 from sunchao/SPARK-33293-2.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove the JSON formatted schema from comments for `from_json()` in Scala/Python APIs.
Closes#30201
### Why are the changes needed?
Schemas in JSON format is internal (not documented). It shouldn't be recommenced for usage.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By linters.
Closes#30226 from MaxGekk/from_json-common-schema-parsing-2.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to group `DateType` and `TimestampType` together in checking time zone needs in the `Cast.needsTimeZone()` method.
### Why are the changes needed?
To improve code maintainability.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By the existing test `"SPARK-33306: Timezone is needed when cast Date to String"`.
Closes#30223 from MaxGekk/WangGuangxin-SPARK-33306-followup.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr add all built-in SerDes to `HiveSerDeReadWriteSuite`.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+DDL#LanguageManualDDL-RowFormats&SerDe
### Why are the changes needed?
We will upgrade Parquet, ORC and Avro, need to ensure compatibility.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#30228 from wangyum/SPARK-33319.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As a followup comment from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29804#issuecomment-700650620 , here we add add the physical plan rule DisableUnnecessaryBucketedScan into AQE AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.queryStagePreparationRules, to make auto bucketed scan work with AQE.
The change is mostly in:
* `AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala`: add physical plan rule `DisableUnnecessaryBucketedScan`
* `DisableUnnecessaryBucketedScan.scala`: propagate logical plan link for the file source scan exec operator, otherwise we lose the logical plan link information when AQE is enabled, and will get exception [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/adaptive/AdaptiveSparkPlanExec.scala#L176). (for example, for query `SELECT * FROM bucketed_table` with AQE is enabled)
* `DisableUnnecessaryBucketedScanSuite.scala`: add new test suite for AQE enabled - `DisableUnnecessaryBucketedScanWithoutHiveSupportSuiteAE`, and changed some of tests to use `AdaptiveSparkPlanHelper.find/collect`, to make the plan verification work when AQE enabled.
### Why are the changes needed?
It's reasonable to add the support to allow disabling unnecessary bucketed scan with AQE is enabled, this helps optimize the query when AQE is enabled.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added unit test in `DisableUnnecessaryBucketedScanSuite`.
Closes#30200 from c21/auto-bucket-aqe.
Authored-by: Cheng Su <chengsu@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support rename column for mysql dialect.
### Why are the changes needed?
At the moment, it does not work for mysql version 5.x. So, we should throw proper exception for that case.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, `column rename` with mysql dialect should work correctly.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests for rename column.
Ran the tests to pass with both versions of mysql.
* `export MYSQL_DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME=mysql:5.7.31`
* `export MYSQL_DOCKER_IMAGE_NAME=mysql:8.0`
Closes#30142 from ScrapCodes/mysql-dialect-rename.
Authored-by: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As the Python evaluation consumes the parent iterator in a separate thread, it could consume more data from the parent even after the task ends and the parent is closed. Thus, we should use `ContextAwareIterator` to stop consuming after the task ends.
### Why are the changes needed?
Python/Pandas UDF right after off-heap vectorized reader could cause executor crash.
E.g.,:
```py
spark.range(0, 100000, 1, 1).write.parquet(path)
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.columnVector.offheap.enabled", True)
def f(x):
return 0
fUdf = udf(f, LongType())
spark.read.parquet(path).select(fUdf('id')).head()
```
This is because, the Python evaluation consumes the parent iterator in a separate thread and it consumes more data from the parent even after the task ends and the parent is closed. If an off-heap column vector exists in the parent iterator, it could cause segmentation fault which crashes the executor.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests, and manually.
Closes#30177 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-33277/python_pandas_udf.
Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When `spark.sql.legacy.typeCoercion.datetimeToString.enabled` is enabled, spark will cast date to string when compare date with string. In Spark3, timezone is needed when casting date to string as 72ad9dcd5d/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala (L309).
Howerver, the timezone may not be set because `CastBase.needsTimeZone` returns false for this kind of casting.
A simple way to reproduce this is
```
spark-shell --conf spark.sql.legacy.typeCoercion.datetimeToString.enabled=true
```
when we execute the following sql,
```
select a.d1 from
(select to_date(concat('2000-01-0', id)) as d1 from range(1, 2)) a
join
(select concat('2000-01-0', id) as d2 from range(1, 2)) b
on a.d1 = b.d2
```
it will throw
```
java.util.NoSuchElementException: None.get
at scala.None$.get(Option.scala:529)
at scala.None$.get(Option.scala:527)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.TimeZoneAwareExpression.zoneId(datetimeExpressions.scala:56)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.TimeZoneAwareExpression.zoneId$(datetimeExpressions.scala:56)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.zoneId$lzycompute(Cast.scala:253)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.zoneId(Cast.scala:253)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.dateFormatter$lzycompute(Cast.scala:287)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.dateFormatter(Cast.scala:287)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
As described above, it's a bug here.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Add more UT
Closes#30213 from WangGuangxin/SPARK-33306.
Authored-by: wangguangxin.cn <wangguangxin.cn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `WriteToDataSourceV2Exec` via removing code duplication around write to table logic:
- renamed `AtomicTableWriteExec` to `TableWriteExec` so that the table write logic in this trait can be modified and shared with `CreateTableAsSelectExec`, `ReplaceTableAsSelectExec`, `AtomicCreateTableAsSelectExec ` and `AtomicReplaceTableAsSelectExec`.
- similar to the above, renamed `writeToStagedTable` to `writeToTable` in `TableWriteExec`.
- extended `writeToTable` so that it can handle both staged table as well as non-staged table.
### Why are the changes needed?
Simplify the logic and remove duplication, to make this piece of code easier to maintain.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Pass CIs with the existing test coverage.
Closes#30193 from sunchao/SPARK-33293.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `CatalogImpl.refreshTable`, this moves the `uncacheQuery` call out of the condition `if (cache.nonEmpty)` so that it will be called whether the table itself is cached or not.
### Why are the changes needed?
In the case like the following:
```sql
CREATE TABLE t ...;
CREATE VIEW t1 AS SELECT * FROM t;
REFRESH TABLE t;
```
If the table `t` is refreshed, the view `t1` which is depending on `t` will not be invalidated. This could lead to incorrect result and is similar to [SPARK-19765](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19765).
On the other hand, if we have:
```sql
CREATE TABLE t ...;
CACHE TABLE t;
CREATE VIEW t1 AS SELECT * FROM t;
REFRESH TABLE t;
```
Then the view `t1` will be refreshed. The behavior is somewhat inconsistent.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, with the change any cache that are depending on the table refreshed will be invalidated with the change. Previously this only happens if the table itself is cached.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a new UT for the case.
Closes#30187 from sunchao/SPARK-33290.
Authored-by: Chao Sun <sunchao@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `query.resolved` before analyze `InsertIntoDir`.
### Why are the changes needed?
For better error msg.
```
INSERT OVERWRITE DIRECTORY '/tmp/file' USING PARQUET
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT c3 FROM (
SELECT c1, c2 from values(1,2) t(c1, c2)
)
)
```
Before this PR, we get such error msg
```
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.UnresolvedException: Invalid call to toAttribute on unresolved object, tree: *
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Star.toAttribute(unresolved.scala:244)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.Project$$anonfun$output$1.apply(basicLogicalOperators.scala:52)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.Project$$anonfun$output$1.apply(basicLogicalOperators.scala:52)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:392)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, error msg changed.
### How was this patch tested?
New test.
Closes#30197 from ulysses-you/SPARK-33294.
Authored-by: ulysses <youxiduo@weidian.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a configuration to control the legacy behavior of whether need to pad null value when value size less then schema size.
Since we can't decide whether it's a but and some use need it behavior same as Hive.
### Why are the changes needed?
Provides a compatible choice between historical behavior and Hive
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Existed UT
Closes#30156 from AngersZhuuuu/SPARK-33284.
Lead-authored-by: angerszhu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: AngersZhuuuu <angers.zhu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to improve the error message from `from_json`/`from_csv` by combining errors from all schema parsers:
- DataType.fromJson (except CSV)
- CatalystSqlParser.parseDataType
- CatalystSqlParser.parseTableSchema
Before the changes, `from_json` does not show error messages from the first parser in the chain that could mislead users.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, `from_json` outputs the error message from the fallback schema parser which can confuse end-users. For example:
```scala
val invalidJsonSchema = """{"fields": [{"a":123}], "type": "struct"}"""
df.select(from_json($"json", invalidJsonSchema, Map.empty[String, String])).show()
```
The JSON schema has an issue in `{"a":123}` but the error message doesn't point it out:
```
mismatched input '{' expecting {'ADD', 'AFTER', ...}(line 1, pos 0)
== SQL ==
{"fields": [{"a":123}], "type": "struct"}
^^^
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException:
mismatched input '{' expecting {'ADD', 'AFTER', ... }(line 1, pos 0)
== SQL ==
{"fields": [{"a":123}], "type": "struct"}
^^^
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, after the changes for the example above:
```
Cannot parse the schema in JSON format: Failed to convert the JSON string '{"a":123}' to a field.
Failed fallback parsing: Cannot parse the data type:
mismatched input '{' expecting {'ADD', 'AFTER', ...}(line 1, pos 0)
== SQL ==
{"fields": [{"a":123}], "type": "struct"}
^^^
Failed fallback parsing:
mismatched input '{' expecting {'ADD', 'AFTER', ...}(line 1, pos 0)
== SQL ==
{"fields": [{"a":123}], "type": "struct"}
^^^
```
### How was this patch tested?
- By existing tests suites like `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonExpressionsSuite`.
- Add new test to `JsonFunctionsSuite`.
- Re-gen results for `json-functions.sql`.
Closes#30183 from MaxGekk/fromDDL-error-msg.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to wrap `ArrayBasedMapData` literal representation with `map(...)`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Literal ArrayBasedMapData has inconsistent string representation from `LogicalPlan` to `Optimized Logical Plan/Physical Plan`. Also, the representation at `Optimized Logical Plan` and `Physical Plan` is ambiguous like `[1 AS a#0, keys: [key1], values: [value1] AS b#1]`.
**BEFORE**
```scala
scala> spark.version
res0: String = 2.4.7
scala> sql("SELECT 1 a, map('key1', 'value1') b").explain(true)
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [1 AS a#0, 'map(key1, value1) AS b#1]
+- OneRowRelation
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
a: int, b: map<string,string>
Project [1 AS a#0, map(key1, value1) AS b#1]
+- OneRowRelation
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [1 AS a#0, keys: [key1], values: [value1] AS b#1]
+- OneRowRelation
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [1 AS a#0, keys: [key1], values: [value1] AS b#1]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
**AFTER**
```scala
scala> spark.version
res0: String = 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT
scala> sql("SELECT 1 a, map('key1', 'value1') b").explain(true)
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [1 AS a#4, 'map(key1, value1) AS b#5]
+- OneRowRelation
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
a: int, b: map<string,string>
Project [1 AS a#4, map(key1, value1) AS b#5]
+- OneRowRelation
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [1 AS a#4, map(keys: [key1], values: [value1]) AS b#5]
+- OneRowRelation
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [1 AS a#4, map(keys: [key1], values: [value1]) AS b#5]
+- *(1) Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. This changes the query plan's string representation in `explain` command and UI. However, this is a bug fix.
### How was this patch tested?
Pass the CI with the newly added test case.
Closes#30190 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-33292.
Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In ANSI mode, when a division by zero occurs performing a divide-like operation (Divide, IntegralDivide, Remainder or Pmod), we are returning an incorrect value. Instead, we should throw an exception, as stated in the SQL standard.
### Why are the changes needed?
Result corrupt.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
added UT + existing UTs (improved)
Closes#29882 from luluorta/SPARK-33008.
Authored-by: luluorta <luluorta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to make StateStore compression codec configurable.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently the compression codec of StateStore is not configurable and hard-coded to be lz4. It is better if we can follow Spark other modules to configure the compression codec of StateStore. For example, we can choose zstd codec and zstd is configurable with different compression level.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, after this change users can config different codec for StateStore.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#30162 from viirya/SPARK-33263.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Return schema in SQL format instead of Catalog string from the SchemaOfCsv expression.
### Why are the changes needed?
To unify output of the `schema_of_json()` and `schema_of_csv()`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, they can but `schema_of_csv()` is usually used in combination with `from_csv()`, so, the format of schema shouldn't be much matter.
Before:
```
> SELECT schema_of_csv('1,abc');
struct<_c0:int,_c1:string>
```
After:
```
> SELECT schema_of_csv('1,abc');
STRUCT<`_c0`: INT, `_c1`: STRING>
```
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `CsvFunctionsSuite` and `CsvExpressionsSuite`.
Closes#30180 from MaxGekk/schema_of_csv-sql-schema.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Return schema in SQL format instead of Catalog string from the `SchemaOfJson` expression.
### Why are the changes needed?
In some cases, `from_json()` cannot parse schemas returned by `schema_of_json`, for instance, when JSON fields have spaces (gaps). Such fields will be quoted after the changes, and can be parsed by `from_json()`.
Here is the example:
```scala
val in = Seq("""{"a b": 1}""").toDS()
in.select(from_json('value, schema_of_json("""{"a b": 100}""")) as "parsed")
```
raises the exception:
```
== SQL ==
struct<a b:bigint>
------^^^
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.ParseException.withCommand(ParseDriver.scala:263)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parse(ParseDriver.scala:130)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.parser.AbstractSqlParser.parseTableSchema(ParseDriver.scala:76)
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.DataType$.fromDDL(DataType.scala:131)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.ExprUtils$.evalTypeExpr(ExprUtils.scala:33)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.JsonToStructs.<init>(jsonExpressions.scala:537)
at org.apache.spark.sql.functions$.from_json(functions.scala:4141)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. For example, `schema_of_json` for the input `{"col":0}`.
Before: `struct<col:bigint>`
After: `STRUCT<`col`: BIGINT>`
### How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonExpressionsSuite`.
Closes#30172 from MaxGekk/schema_of_json-sql-schema.
Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For complex query plans, `QueryPlan.transformUpWithNewOutput` will keep accumulating the attributes mapping to be propagated, which may hurt performance. This PR prunes the attributes mapping before propagating.
### Why are the changes needed?
A simple perf improvement.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#30173 from cloud-fan/bug.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix the NPE issue on `In` filter when one of values contain null. In real case, you can trigger this issue when you try to push down the filter with `in (..., null)` against V2 source table. `DataSourceStrategy` caches the mapping (filter instance -> expression) in HashMap, which leverages hash code on the key, hence it could trigger the NPE issue.
### Why are the changes needed?
This is an obvious bug as `In` filter doesn't care about null value when calculating hash code.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, previously the query with having `null` in "in" condition against data source V2 source table supporting push down filter failed with NPE, whereas after the PR the query will not fail.
### How was this patch tested?
UT added. The new UT fails without the PR and passes with the PR.
Closes#30170 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-33267.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to fix bus for casting data from/to PythonUserDefinedType. A sequence of queries to reproduce this issue is as follows;
```
>>> from pyspark.sql import Row
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import col
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import *
>>> from pyspark.testing.sqlutils import *
>>>
>>> row = Row(point=ExamplePoint(1.0, 2.0))
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame([row])
>>> df.select(col("point").cast(PythonOnlyUDT()))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/Users/maropu/Repositories/spark/spark-master/python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 1402, in select
jdf = self._jdf.select(self._jcols(*cols))
File "/Users/maropu/Repositories/spark/spark-master/python/lib/py4j-0.10.9-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 1305, in __call__
File "/Users/maropu/Repositories/spark/spark-master/python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 111, in deco
return f(*a, **kw)
File "/Users/maropu/Repositories/spark/spark-master/python/lib/py4j-0.10.9-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 328, in get_return_value
py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o44.select.
: java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.spark.sql.types.UserDefinedType.acceptsType(UserDefinedType.scala:84)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Cast$.canCast(Cast.scala:96)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.checkInputDataTypes(Cast.scala:267)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.resolved$lzycompute(Cast.scala:290)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CastBase.resolved(Cast.scala:290)
```
A root cause of this issue is that, since `PythonUserDefinedType#userClassis` always null, `isAssignableFrom` in `UserDefinedType#acceptsType` throws a null exception. To fix it, this PR defines `acceptsType` in `PythonUserDefinedType` and filters out the null case in `UserDefinedType#acceptsType`.
### Why are the changes needed?
Bug fixes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#30169 from maropu/FixPythonUDTCast.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Change-Id: I82db1f9e8f667573aa3a03e05152cbed0ea7686b
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update the document of SparkSession#sql, mention that this API eagerly runs DDL/DML commands, but not for SELECT queries.
### Why are the changes needed?
To clarify the behavior of SparkSession#sql.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
No needed.
Closes#30168 from waitinfuture/master.
Authored-by: zky.zhoukeyong <zky.zhoukeyong@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark SQL supports some window function like `NTH_VALUE`.
If we specify window frame like `UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW` or `UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING`, we can elimate some calculations.
For example: if we execute the SQL show below:
```
SELECT NTH_VALUE(col,
2) OVER(ORDER BY rank UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
AND CURRENT ROW)
FROM tab;
```
The output for row number greater than 1, return the fixed value. otherwise, return null. So we just calculate the value once and notice whether the row number less than 2.
`UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING` is simpler.
### Why are the changes needed?
Improve the performance for `NTH_VALUE`, `FIRST_VALUE` and `LAST_VALUE`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
'No'.
### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins test.
Closes#29800 from beliefer/optimize-nth_value.
Lead-authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Co-authored-by: beliefer <beliefer@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiaan Geng <beliefer@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix a correctness bug in the optimizer rule `EliminateSorts`. It also adds a new physical rule to remove redundant sorts that cannot be eliminated in the Optimizer rule after the bugfix.
### Why are the changes needed?
A global sort should not be eliminated even if its child is ordered since we don't know if its child ordering is global or local. For example, in the following scenario, the first sort shouldn't be removed because it has a stronger guarantee than the second sort even if the sort orders are the same for both sorts.
```
Sort(orders, global = True, ...)
Sort(orders, global = False, ...)
```
Since there is no straightforward way to identify whether a node's output ordering is local or global, we should not remove a global sort even if its child is already ordered.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes
### How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#30093 from allisonwang-db/fix-sort.
Authored-by: allisonwang-db <66282705+allisonwang-db@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to migrate `DROP TABLE` to use `UnresolvedTableOrView` to resolve the table/view identifier. This allows consistent resolution rules (temp view first, etc.) to be applied for both v1/v2 commands. More info about the consistent resolution rule proposal can be found in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29900) or [proposal doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hvLjGA8y_W_hhilpngXVub1Ebv8RsMap986nENCFnrg/edit?usp=sharing).
### Why are the changes needed?
The current behavior is not consistent between v1 and v2 commands when resolving a temp view.
In v2, the `t` in the following example is resolved to a table:
```scala
sql("CREATE TABLE testcat.ns.t (id bigint) USING foo")
sql("CREATE TEMPORARY VIEW t AS SELECT 2")
sql("USE testcat.ns")
sql("DROP TABLE t") // 't' is resolved to testcat.ns.t
```
whereas in v1, the `t` is resolved to a temp view:
```scala
sql("CREATE DATABASE test")
sql("CREATE TABLE spark_catalog.test.t (id bigint) USING csv")
sql("CREATE TEMPORARY VIEW t AS SELECT 2")
sql("USE spark_catalog.test")
sql("DROP TABLE t") // 't' is resolved to a temp view
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
After this PR, for v2, `DROP TABLE t` is resolved to a temp view `t` instead of `testcat.ns.t`, consistent with v1 behavior.
### How was this patch tested?
Added a new test
Closes#30079 from imback82/drop_table_consistent.
Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch proposes to change the behavior on failing fast when Spark fails to instantiate configured v2 session catalog.
### Why are the changes needed?
The Spark behavior is against the intention of the end users - if end users configure session catalog which Spark would fail to initialize, Spark would swallow the error with only logging the error message and silently use the default catalog implementation.
This follows the voices on [discussion thread](https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdfa22a5ebdc4ac66e2c5c8ff0cd9d750e8a1690cd6fb456d119c2400%40%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E) in dev mailing list.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. After the PR Spark will fail immediately if Spark fails to instantiate configured session catalog.
### How was this patch tested?
New UT added.
Closes#30147 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-33240.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
