## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, looks we hit the time limit time to time. Looks better increasing the time a bit.
For instance, please see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21822
For clarification, current Jenkins timeout is 400m. This PR just proposes to fix the test script to increase it correspondingly.
*This PR does not target to change the build configuration*
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Closes#21845 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-24886.
Authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch bumps the master branch version to `2.4.0-SNAPSHOT`.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#20222 from gatorsmile/bump24.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Recently, Jenkins tests were unstable due to unknown reasons as below:
```
/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder/dev/lint-r ; process was terminated by signal 9
test_result_code, test_result_note = run_tests(tests_timeout)
File "./dev/run-tests-jenkins.py", line 140, in run_tests
test_result_note = ' * This patch **fails %s**.' % failure_note_by_errcode[test_result_code]
KeyError: -9
```
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./dev/run-tests-jenkins.py", line 226, in <module>
main()
File "./dev/run-tests-jenkins.py", line 213, in main
test_result_code, test_result_note = run_tests(tests_timeout)
File "./dev/run-tests-jenkins.py", line 140, in run_tests
test_result_note = ' * This patch **fails %s**.' % failure_note_by_errcode[test_result_code]
KeyError: -10
```
This exception looks causing failing to update the comments in the PR. For example:
these comment just remain.
This always requires, for both reviewers and the author, a overhead to click and check the logs, which I believe are not really useful.
This PR proposes to leave the code in the PR comment messages and let update the comments.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests below, I manually gave the error code to test this.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#18399 from HyukjinKwon/jenkins-print-errors.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After SPARK-19464, **SparkPullRequestBuilder** fails because it still tries to use hadoop2.3.
**BEFORE**
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72595/console
```
========================================================================
Building Spark
========================================================================
[error] Could not find hadoop2.3 in the list. Valid options are ['hadoop2.6', 'hadoop2.7']
Attempting to post to Github...
> Post successful.
```
**AFTER**
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72595/console
```
========================================================================
Building Spark
========================================================================
[info] Building Spark (w/Hive 1.2.1) using SBT with these arguments: -Phadoop-2.6 -Pmesos -Pkinesis-asl -Pyarn -Phive-thriftserver -Phive test:package streaming-kafka-0-8-assembly/assembly streaming-flume-assembly/assembly streaming-kinesis-asl-assembly/assembly
Using /usr/java/jdk1.8.0_60 as default JAVA_HOME.
Note, this will be overridden by -java-home if it is set.
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing test.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#16858 from dongjoon-hyun/hotfix_run-tests.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the full console output page of a Spark Jenkins PR build can be as large as several megabytes. It takes a relatively long time to load and may even freeze the browser for quite a while.
This PR makes the build script to post the test report page link to GitHub instead. The test report page is way more concise and is usually the first page I'd like to check when investigating a Jenkins build failure.
Note that for builds that a test report is not available (ongoing builds and builds that fail before test execution), the test report link automatically redirects to the build page.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#16163 from liancheng/jenkins-test-report.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to provide a pip installable PySpark package. This does a bunch of work to copy the jars over and package them with the Python code (to prevent challenges from trying to use different versions of the Python code with different versions of the JAR). It does not currently publish to PyPI but that is the natural follow up (SPARK-18129).
Done:
- pip installable on conda [manual tested]
- setup.py installed on a non-pip managed system (RHEL) with YARN [manual tested]
- Automated testing of this (virtualenv)
- packaging and signing with release-build*
Possible follow up work:
- release-build update to publish to PyPI (SPARK-18128)
- figure out who owns the pyspark package name on prod PyPI (is it someone with in the project or should we ask PyPI or should we choose a different name to publish with like ApachePySpark?)
- Windows support and or testing ( SPARK-18136 )
- investigate details of wheel caching and see if we can avoid cleaning the wheel cache during our test
- consider how we want to number our dev/snapshot versions
Explicitly out of scope:
- Using pip installed PySpark to start a standalone cluster
- Using pip installed PySpark for non-Python Spark programs
*I've done some work to test release-build locally but as a non-committer I've just done local testing.
## How was this patch tested?
Automated testing with virtualenv, manual testing with conda, a system wide install, and YARN integration.
release-build changes tested locally as a non-committer (no testing of upload artifacts to Apache staging websites)
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Author: Juliet Hougland <juliet@cloudera.com>
Author: Juliet Hougland <not@myemail.com>
Closes#15659 from holdenk/SPARK-1267-pip-install-pyspark.
This patch adds a Hadoop 2.7 build profile in order to let us automate tests against that version.
/cc rxin srowen
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#10775 from JoshRosen/add-hadoop-2.7-profile.
There are a couple of places in the `dev/run-tests-*.py` scripts which deal with Hadoop profiles, but the set of profiles that they handle does not include all Hadoop profiles defined in our POM. Similarly, the `hadoop-2.2` and `hadoop-2.6` profiles were missing from `dev/deps`.
This patch updates these scripts to include all four Hadoop profiles defined in our POM.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes#10565 from JoshRosen/add-missing-hadoop-profiles-in-test-scripts.
This patch adds a new build check which enumerates Spark's resolved runtime classpath and saves it to a file, then diffs against that file to detect whether pull requests have introduced dependency changes. The aim of this check is to make it simpler to reason about whether pull request which modify the build have introduced new dependencies or changed transitive dependencies in a way that affects the final classpath.
This supplants the checks added in SPARK-4123 / #5093, which are currently disabled due to bugs.
This patch is based on pwendell's work in #8531.
Closes#8531.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Author: Patrick Wendell <patrick@databricks.com>
Closes#10461 from JoshRosen/SPARK-10359.
This replaces https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9696
Invoke Checkstyle and print any errors to the console, failing the step.
Use Google's style rules modified according to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Spark+Code+Style+Guide
Some important checks are disabled (see TODOs in `checkstyle.xml`) due to
multiple violations being present in the codebase.
Suggest fixing those TODOs in a separate PR(s).
More on Checkstyle can be found on the [official website](http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/).
Sample output (from [build 46345](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46345/consoleFull)) (duplicated because I run the build twice with different profiles):
> Checkstyle checks failed at following occurrences:
[ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader.java:[217,7] (coding) MissingSwitchDefault: switch without "default" clause.
> [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java:[198,10] (modifier) ModifierOrder: 'protected' modifier out of order with the JLS suggestions.
> [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader.java:[217,7] (coding) MissingSwitchDefault: switch without "default" clause.
> [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java:[198,10] (modifier) ModifierOrder: 'protected' modifier out of order with the JLS suggestions.
> [error] running /home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder2/dev/lint-java ; received return code 1
Also fix some of the minor violations that didn't require sweeping changes.
Apologies for the previous botched PRs - I finally figured out the issue.
cr: JoshRosen, pwendell
> I state that the contribution is my original work, and I license the work to the project under the project's open source license.
Author: Dmitry Erastov <derastov@gmail.com>
Closes#9867 from dskrvk/master.
This commit refactors the `run-tests-jenkins` script into Python. This refactoring was done by brennonyork in #7401; this PR contains a few minor edits from joshrosen in order to bring it up to date with other recent changes.
From the original PR description (by brennonyork):
Currently a few things are left out that, could and I think should, be smaller JIRA's after this.
1. There are still a few areas where we use environment variables where we don't need to (like `CURRENT_BLOCK`). I might get around to fixing this one in lieu of everything else, but wanted to point that out.
2. The PR tests are still written in bash. I opted to not change those and just rewrite the runner into Python. This is a great follow-on JIRA IMO.
3. All of the linting scripts are still in bash as well and would likely do to just add those in as follow-on JIRA's as well.
Closes#7401.
Author: Brennon York <brennon.york@capitalone.com>
Closes#9161 from JoshRosen/run-tests-jenkins-refactoring.
