## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
During the migration of CSV V2(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24005), I find that we can improve the file source v2 framework by:
1. check duplicated column names in both read and write
2. Not all the file sources support filter push down. So remove `SupportsPushDownFilters` from FileScanBuilder
3. The method `isSplitable` might require data source options. Add a new member `options` to FileScan.
4. Make `FileTable.schema` a lazy value instead of a method.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test
Closes#24066 from gengliangwang/reviseFileSourceV2.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The data source option check_files_exist is introduced in In #23383 when the file source V2 framework is implemented. In the PR, FileIndex was created as a member of FileTable, so that we could implement partition pruning like 0f9fcab in the future. At that time `FileIndex`es will always be created for file writes, so we needed the option to decide whether to check file existence.
After https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23774, the option is not needed anymore, since Dataframe writes won't create unnecessary FileIndex. This PR is to remove the option.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#24069 from gengliangwang/removeOptionCheckFilesExist.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Further load increases in our production environment have shown that even the read locks can cause some contention, since they contain a mechanism that turns a read lock into an exclusive lock if a writer has been starved out. This PR reduces the potential for lock contention even further than https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23833. Additionally, it uses more idiomatic scala than the previous implementation.
cloud-fan & gatorsmile This is a relatively minor improvement to the previous CacheManager changes. At this point, I think we finally are doing the minimum possible amount of locking.
## How was this patch tested?
Has been tested on a live system where the blocking was causing major issues and it is working well.
CacheManager has no explicit unit test but is used in many places internally as part of the SharedState.
Closes#24028 from DaveDeCaprio/read-locks-master.
Lead-authored-by: Dave DeCaprio <daved@alum.mit.edu>
Co-authored-by: David DeCaprio <daved@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We create many stores in the SQLAppStatusListenerSuite, but we need to the close store after test.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#24079 from shahidki31/SPARK-27145.
Authored-by: Shahid <shahidki31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SPARK-27011, we introduced `IgnoreCahedData` to avoid plan node copys in `CacheManager`.
Since `ClearCacheCommand` has no argument, it also can extend `IgnoreCahedData`.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass Jenkins.
Closes#24081 from maropu/SPARK-27011-2.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr updated parsing rules in `SqlBase.g4` to support a SQL query below when ANSI mode enabled;
```
SELECT CAST('2017-08-04' AS DATE) + 1 days;
```
The current master cannot parse it though, other dbms-like systems support the syntax (e.g., hive and mysql). Also, the syntax is frequently used in the official TPC-DS queries.
This pr added new tokens as follows;
```
YEAR | YEARS | MONTH | MONTHS | WEEK | WEEKS | DAY | DAYS | HOUR | HOURS | MINUTE
MINUTES | SECOND | SECONDS | MILLISECOND | MILLISECONDS | MICROSECOND | MICROSECONDS
```
Then, it registered the keywords below as the ANSI reserved (this follows SQL-2011);
```
DAY | HOUR | MINUTE | MONTH | SECOND | YEAR
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `SQLQuerySuite`, `ExpressionParserSuite`, and `TableIdentifierParserSuite`.
Closes#20433 from maropu/SPARK-23264.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch deduplicates the huge if statements regarding getting value between specialized getters.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.
Closes#24016 from HeartSaVioR/MINOR-deduplicate-get-from-specialized-getters.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's a little awkward to have 2 different classes(`CaseInsensitiveStringMap` and `DataSourceOptions`) to present the options in data source and catalog API.
This PR merges these 2 classes, while keeping the name `CaseInsensitiveStringMap`, which is more precise.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#24025 from cloud-fan/option.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR puts in a limit on the size of a debug string generated for a tree node. Helps to fix out of memory errors when large plans have huge debug strings. In addition to SPARK-26103, this should also address SPARK-23904 and SPARK-25380. AN alternative solution was proposed in #23076, but that solution doesn't address all the cases that can cause a large query. This limit is only on calls treeString that don't pass a Writer, which makes it play nicely with #22429, #23018 and #23039. Full plans can be written to files, but truncated plans will be used when strings are held in memory, such as for the UI.
- A new configuration parameter called spark.sql.debug.maxPlanLength was added to control the length of the plans.
- When plans are truncated, "..." is printed to indicate that it isn't a full plan
- A warning is printed out the first time a truncated plan is displayed. The warning explains what happened and how to adjust the limit.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests were created for the new SizeLimitedWriter. Also a unit test for TreeNode was created that checks that a long plan is correctly truncated.
Closes#23169 from DaveDeCaprio/text-plan-size.
Lead-authored-by: Dave DeCaprio <daved@alum.mit.edu>
Co-authored-by: David DeCaprio <daved@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
According to the [design](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vI26UEuDpVuOjWw4WPoH2T6y8WAekwtI7qoowhOFnI4/edit?usp=sharing), the life cycle of `StreamingWrite` should be the same as the read side `MicroBatch/ContinuousStream`, i.e. each run of the stream query, instead of each epoch.
This PR fixes it.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23981 from cloud-fan/dsv2.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a followup to #23943. This proposes to rename ParquetSchemaPruning to SchemaPruning as ParquetSchemaPruning supports both Parquet and ORC v1 now.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#24077 from viirya/nested-schema-pruning-orc-followup.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We only supported nested schema pruning for Parquet previously. This proposes to support nested schema pruning for ORC too.
Note: This only covers ORC v1. For ORC v2, the necessary change is at the schema pruning rule. We should deal with ORC v2 as a TODO item, in order to reduce review burden.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests.
Closes#23943 from viirya/nested-schema-pruning-orc.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
LEGACY_DRIVER_IDENTIFIER and its reference are removed.
corresponding references test are updated.
## How was this patch tested?
tested UT test cases
Closes#24026 from shivusondur/newjira2.
Authored-by: shivusondur <shivusondur@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added test suite for AllExecutionsPage class. Checked the scenarios for SPARK-27019 and SPARK-27075.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT, manually tested
Closes#24052 from shahidki31/SPARK-27125.
Authored-by: Shahid <shahidki31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When cache is enabled ( i.e once cache table command is executed), any following sql will trigger
CacheManager#lookupCachedData which will create a copy of the tree node, which inturn calls TreeNode#makeCopy. Here the problem is it will try to create a copy instance. But as ResetCommand is a case object this will fail
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT to reproduce the issue
Closes#23918 from ajithme/reset.
Authored-by: Ajith <ajith2489@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to have one base R runner.
In the high level,
Previously, it had `ArrowRRunner` and it inherited `RRunner`:
```
└── RRunner
└── ArrowRRunner
```
After this PR, now it has a `BaseRRunner`, and `ArrowRRunner` and `RRunner` inherit `BaseRRunner`:
```
└── BaseRRunner
├── ArrowRRunner
└── RRunner
```
This way is consistent with Python's.
In more details, see below:
```scala
class BaseRRunner[IN, OUT] {
def compute: Iterator[OUT] = {
...
newWriterThread(...).start()
...
newReaderIterator(...)
...
}
// Make a thread that writes data from JVM to R process
abstract protected def newWriterThread(..., iter: Iterator[IN], ...): WriterThread
// Make an iterator that reads data from the R process to JVM
abstract protected def newReaderIterator(...): ReaderIterator
abstract class WriterThread(..., iter: Iterator[IN], ...) extends Thread {
override def run(): Unit {
...
writeIteratorToStream(...)
...
}
// Actually writing logic to the socket stream.
abstract protected def writeIteratorToStream(dataOut: DataOutputStream): Unit
}
abstract class ReaderIterator extends Iterator[OUT] {
override def hasNext(): Boolean = {
...
read(...)
...
}
override def next(): OUT = {
...
hasNext()
...
}
// Actually reading logic from the socket stream.
abstract protected def read(...): OUT
}
}
```
```scala
case [Arrow]RRunner extends BaseRRunner {
override def newWriterThread(...) {
new WriterThread(...) {
override def writeIteratorToStream(...) {
...
}
}
}
override def newReaderIterator(...) {
new ReaderIterator(...) {
override def read(...) {
...
}
}
}
}
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested and existing tests should cover.
Closes#23977 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-26923.
Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
The docs describing RangeBetween & RowsBetween for pySpark & SparkR are not in sync with Spark description.
a. Edited PySpark and SparkR docs and made description same for both RangeBetween and RowsBetween
b. created executable examples in both pySpark and SparkR documentation
c. Locally tested the patch for scala Style checks and UT for checking no testcase failures
Closes#23946 from jagadesh-kiran/master.
Authored-by: Jagadesh Kiran <jagadesh.n@in.verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently in the grammar file, we have the joinType rule defined as following :
```
joinType
: INNER?
....
....
| LEFT SEMI
| LEFT? ANTI
;
```
The keyword LEFT is optional for ANTI join even though its not optional for SEMI join. When
using data frame interface join type "anti" is not allowed. The allowed types are "left_anti" or
"leftanti" for anti joins. ~~In this PR, i am making the LEFT keyword mandatory for ANTI joins so
it aligns better with the LEFT SEMI join in the grammar file and also the join types allowed from dataframe api.~~
This PR makes LEFT optional for SEMI join in .g4 and add "semi" and "anti" join types from dataframe.
~~I have not opened any JIRA for this as probably we may need some discussion to see if
we are going to address this or not.~~
## How was this patch tested?
Modified the join type tests.
Closes#23982 from dilipbiswal/join_fix.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To reuse some common logics for improving `Analyze` commands (See the description of `SPARK-25196` for details), this pr moved some functions from `AnalyzeColumnCommand` to `command/CommandUtils`. A follow-up pr will add code to extend `Analyze` commands for cached tables.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22204 from maropu/SPARK-25196.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before a Kafka consumer gets assigned with partitions, its offset will contain 0 partitions. However, runContinuous will still run and launch a Spark job having 0 partitions. In this case, there is a race that epoch may interrupt the query execution thread after `lastExecution.toRdd`, and either `epochEndpoint.askSync[Unit](StopContinuousExecutionWrites)` or the next `runContinuous` will get interrupted unintentionally.
To handle this case, this PR has the following changes:
- Clean up the resources in `queryExecutionThread.runUninterruptibly`. This may increase the waiting time of `stop` but should be minor because the operations here are very fast (just sending an RPC message in the same process and stopping a very simple thread).
- Clear the interrupted status at the end so that it won't impact the `runContinuous` call. We may clear the interrupted status set by `stop`, but it doesn't affect the query termination because `runActivatedStream` will check `state` and exit accordingly.
I also updated the clean up codes to make sure exceptions thrown from `epochEndpoint.askSync[Unit](StopContinuousExecutionWrites)` won't stop the clean up.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Closes#24034 from zsxwing/SPARK-27111.
Authored-by: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark SQL performs whole-stage code generation to speed up query execution. There are two steps to it:
- Java source code is generated from the physical query plan on the driver. A single version of the source code is generated from a query plan, and sent to all executors.
- It's compiled to bytecode on the driver to catch compilation errors before sending to executors, but currently only the generated source code gets sent to the executors. The bytecode compilation is for fail-fast only.
- Executors receive the generated source code and compile to bytecode, then the query runs like a hand-written Java program.
In this model, there's an implicit assumption about the driver and executors being run on similar platforms. Some code paths accidentally embedded platform-dependent object layout information into the generated code, such as:
```java
Platform.putLong(buffer, /* offset */ 24, /* value */ 1);
```
This code expects a field to be at offset +24 of the `buffer` object, and sets a value to that field.
But whole-stage code generation generally uses platform-dependent information from the driver. If the object layout is significantly different on the driver and executors, the generated code can be reading/writing to wrong offsets on the executors, causing all kinds of data corruption.
One code pattern that leads to such problem is the use of `Platform.XXX` constants in generated code, e.g. `Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET`.
Bad:
```scala
val baseOffset = Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET
// codegen template:
s"Platform.putLong($buffer, $baseOffset, $value);"
```
This will embed the value of `Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET` on the driver into the generated code.
Good:
```scala
val baseOffset = "Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET"
// codegen template:
s"Platform.putLong($buffer, $baseOffset, $value);"
```
This will generate the offset symbolically -- `Platform.putLong(buffer, Platform.BYTE_ARRAY_OFFSET, value)`, which will be able to pick up the correct value on the executors.
Caveat: these offset constants are declared as runtime-initialized `static final` in Java, so they're not compile-time constants from the Java language's perspective. It does lead to a slightly increased size of the generated code, but this is necessary for correctness.
NOTE: there can be other patterns that generate platform-dependent code on the driver which is invalid on the executors. e.g. if the endianness is different between the driver and the executors, and if some generated code makes strong assumption about endianness, it would also be problematic.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test suite `WholeStageCodegenSparkSubmitSuite`. This test suite needs to set the driver's extraJavaOptions to force the driver and executor use different Java object layouts, so it's run as an actual SparkSubmit job.
Authored-by: Kris Mok <kris.mokdatabricks.com>
Closes#24031 from gatorsmile/cherrypickSPARK-27097.
Lead-authored-by: Kris Mok <kris.mok@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds a v2 API for adding new catalog plugins to Spark.
* Catalog implementations extend `CatalogPlugin` and are loaded via reflection, similar to data sources
* `Catalogs` loads and initializes catalogs using configuration from a `SQLConf`
* `CaseInsensitiveStringMap` is used to pass configuration to `CatalogPlugin` via `initialize`
Catalogs are configured by adding config properties starting with `spark.sql.catalog.(name)`. The name property must specify a class that implements `CatalogPlugin`. Other properties under the namespace (`spark.sql.catalog.(name).(prop)`) are passed to the provider during initialization along with the catalog name.
This replaces #21306, which will be implemented in two multiple parts: the catalog plugin system (this commit) and specific catalog APIs, like `TableCatalog`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test suites for `CaseInsensitiveStringMap` and for catalog loading.
Closes#23915 from rdblue/SPARK-24252-add-v2-catalog-plugins.
Authored-by: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[SPARK-24638](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24638) adds support for Parquet file `StartsWith` predicate push down.
`InMemoryTable` can also support this feature.
This is an example to explain how it works, Imagine that the `id` column stored as below:
Partition ID | lowerBound | upperBound
-- | -- | --
p1 | '1' | '9'
p2 | '10' | '19'
p3 | '20' | '29'
p4 | '30' | '39'
p5 | '40' | '49'
A filter ```df.filter($"id".startsWith("2"))``` or ```id like '2%'```
then we substr lowerBound and upperBound:
Partition ID | lowerBound.substr(0, Length("2")) | upperBound.substr(0, Length("2"))
-- | -- | --
p1 | '1' | '9'
p2 | '1' | '1'
p3 | '2' | '2'
p4 | '3' | '3'
p5 | '4' | '4'
We can see that we only need to read `p1` and `p3`.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and benchmark tests
benchmark test result:
```
================================================================================================
Pushdown benchmark for StringStartsWith
================================================================================================
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_191-b12 on Mac OS X 10.12.6
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7820HQ CPU 2.90GHz
StringStartsWith filter: (value like '10%'): Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
InMemoryTable Vectorized 12068 / 14198 1.3 767.3 1.0X
InMemoryTable Vectorized (Pushdown) 5457 / 8662 2.9 347.0 2.2X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_191-b12 on Mac OS X 10.12.6
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7820HQ CPU 2.90GHz
StringStartsWith filter: (value like '1000%'): Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
InMemoryTable Vectorized 5246 / 5355 3.0 333.5 1.0X
InMemoryTable Vectorized (Pushdown) 2185 / 2346 7.2 138.9 2.4X
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_191-b12 on Mac OS X 10.12.6
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7820HQ CPU 2.90GHz
StringStartsWith filter: (value like '786432%'): Best/Avg Time(ms) Rate(M/s) Per Row(ns) Relative
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
InMemoryTable Vectorized 5112 / 5312 3.1 325.0 1.0X
InMemoryTable Vectorized (Pushdown) 2292 / 2522 6.9 145.7 2.2X
```
Closes#23004 from wangyum/SPARK-26004.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Throw an exception if spark.sql.shuffle.partitions=0
This takes over https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23835
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#24008 from srowen/SPARK-24783.2.
Lead-authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: WindCanDie <491237260@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is follow-up PR which addresses review comment in PR for SPARK-27001:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23908#discussion_r261511454
This patch proposes addressing primitive array type for serializer - instead of handling it to generic one, Spark now handles it efficiently as primitive array.
## How was this patch tested?
UT modified to include primitive array.
Closes#24015 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-27001-FOLLOW-UP-java-primitive-array.
Authored-by: Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a very minor pr to include the usage example to generate output for single test in SQLQueryTestSuite. I tried to deduce it from the existing example and ran into a scenario
where sbt is simply looping to run the same test over and over again. Here is the example
of running a single test.
```
build/sbt "~sql/test-only *SQLQueryTestSuite -- -z inline-table.sql"
```
I tried to generate the output for a single test by prepending `SPARK_GENERATE_GOLDEN_FILES=1` like following
```
SPARK_GENERATE_GOLDEN_FILES=1 build/sbt "~sql/test-only *SQLQueryTestSuite -- -z describe.sql"
```
In this case i found that sbt is looping trying to run describe.sql over and over again as we are running the test in on continuous mode (because of `~` prefix ) where it detects a change in
the generated result file which in turn triggers a build and test. I have included an example where
we don't run it in continuous mode when generating the output. Hopefully it saves other developers some time.
## How was this patch tested?
Verified manually in my dev setup.
Closes#23995 from dilipbiswal/dkb_sqlquerytest_usage.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
While I am migrating other data sources, I find that we should abstract the logic that:
1. converting safe `InternalRow`s into `UnsafeRow`s
2. appending partition values to the end of the result row if existed
This PR proposes to support handling partition values in file source v2 abstraction by adding a util class `PartitionReaderWithPartitionValues`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests
Closes#23987 from gengliangwang/SPARK-27049.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I would like to refactor `limit.scala` slightly and introduce common trait `LimitExec` for `CollectLimitExec` and `BaseLimitExec` (`LocalLimitExec` and `GlobalLimitExec`). This will allow to distinguish those operators from others, and to get the `limit` value without casting to concrete class.
## How was this patch tested?
by existing test suites.
Closes#23976 from MaxGekk/limit-exec.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when the event reordering happens, especially onJobStart event come after onExecutionEnd event, SQL page in the UI displays weirdly.(for eg:test mentioned in JIRA and also this issue randomly occurs when the TPCDS query fails due to broadcast timeout etc.)
The reason is that, In the SQLAppstatusListener, we remove the liveExecutions entry once the execution ends. So, if a jobStart event come after that, then we create a new liveExecution entry corresponding to the execId. Eventually this will overwrite the kvstore and UI displays confusing entries.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT, Also manually tested with the eventLog, provided in the jira, of the failed query.
Before fix:
After fix:
Closes#23939 from shahidki31/SPARK-27019.
Authored-by: Shahid <shahidki31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before dropping database refresh the tables of that database, so as to refresh all cached entries associated with those tables.
We follow the same when dropping a table.
## How was this patch tested?
UT is added
Closes#23905 from Udbhav30/SPARK-24669.
Authored-by: Udbhav30 <u.agrawal30@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removed unnecessary conversion of microseconds in `DateTimeUtils.timestampToString` to `java.sql.Timestamp` which aims to output fraction of seconds by casting it to string. This was replaced by special `TimestampFormatter` which appends the fraction formatter to `DateTimeFormatterBuilder`: `appendFraction(ChronoField.NANO_OF_SECOND, 0, 9, true)`. The former one means trailing zeros in second's fraction should be truncated while formatting.
## How was this patch tested?
By existing test suites like `CastSuite`, `DateTimeUtilsSuite`, `JDBCSuite`, and by new test in `TimestampFormatterSuite`.
Closes#23936 from MaxGekk/timestamp-to-string.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We have benchmark of nested schema pruning, but only for Parquet. This adds similar benchmark for ORC. This is used with nested schema pruning of ORC.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Closes#23955 from viirya/orc-nested-schema-pruning-benchmark.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR optimizes `InSet` expressions for byte, short, integer, date types. It is a follow-up on PR #21442 from dbtsai.
`In` expressions are compiled into a sequence of if-else statements, which results in O\(n\) time complexity. `InSet` is an optimized version of `In`, which is supposed to improve the performance if all values are literals and the number of elements is big enough. However, `InSet` actually worsens the performance in many cases due to various reasons.
The main idea of this PR is to use Java `switch` statements to significantly improve the performance of `InSet` expressions for bytes, shorts, ints, dates. All `switch` statements are compiled into `tableswitch` and `lookupswitch` bytecode instructions. We will have O\(1\) time complexity if our case values are compact and `tableswitch` can be used. Otherwise, `lookupswitch` will give us O\(log n\).
Locally, I tried Spark `OpenHashSet` and primitive collections from `fastutils` in order to solve the boxing issue in `InSet`. Both options significantly decreased the memory consumption and `fastutils` improved the time compared to `HashSet` from Scala. However, the switch-based approach was still more than two times faster even on 500+ non-compact elements.
I also noticed that applying the switch-based approach on less than 10 elements gives a relatively minor improvement compared to the if-else approach. Therefore, I placed the switch-based logic into `InSet` and added a new config to track when it is applied. Even if we migrate to primitive collections at some point, the switch logic will be still faster unless the number of elements is really big. Another option is to have a separate `InSwitch` expression. However, this would mean we need to modify other places (e.g., `DataSourceStrategy`).
See [here](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se7/html/jvms-3.html#jvms-3.10) and [here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10287700/difference-between-jvms-lookupswitch-and-tableswitch) for more information.
This PR does not cover long values as Java `switch` statements cannot be used on them. However, we can have a follow-up PR with an approach similar to binary search.
## How was this patch tested?
There are new tests that verify the logic of the proposed optimization.
The performance was evaluated using existing benchmarks. This PR was also tested on an EC2 instance (OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 1.8.0_191-b12 on Linux 4.14.77-70.59.amzn1.x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2686 v4 2.30GHz).
## Notes
- [This link](http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/langtools/file/30db5e0aaf83/src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/jvm/Gen.java#l1153) contains source code that decides between `tableswitch` and `lookupswitch`. The logic was re-used in the benchmarks. See the `isLookupSwitch` method.
Closes#23171 from aokolnychyi/spark-26205.
Lead-authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clarify that text DataSource read/write, and RDD methods that read text, always use UTF-8 as they use Hadoop's implementation underneath. I think these are all the places that this needs a mention in the user-facing docs.
## How was this patch tested?
Doc tests.
Closes#23962 from srowen/SPARK-26016.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When reading files with empty partition columns, we can avoid using JoinRow.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#23953 from gengliangwang/avoidJoinRow.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds support for pushing down LeftSemi and LeftAnti joins below operators such as Project, Aggregate, Window, Union etc. This is the initial piece of work that will be needed for
the subsequent work of moving the subquery rewrites to the beginning of optimization phase.
The larger PR is [here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23211) . This PR addresses the comment at [link](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23211#issuecomment-445705922).
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test suite LeftSemiAntiJoinPushDownSuite.
Closes#23750 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-19712-pushleftsemi.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Similar to `SaveMode`, we should remove streaming `OutputMode` from data source v2 API, and use operations that has clear semantic.
The changes are:
1. append mode: create `StreamingWrite` directly. By default, the `WriteBuilder` will create `Write` to append data.
2. complete mode: call `SupportsTruncate#truncate`. Complete mode means truncating all the old data and appending new data of the current epoch. `SupportsTruncate` has exactly the same semantic.
3. update mode: fail. The current streaming framework can't propagate the update keys, so v2 sinks are not able to implement update mode. In the future we can introduce a `SupportsUpdate` trait.
The behavior changes:
1. all the v2 sinks(foreach, console, memory, kafka, noop) don't support update mode. The fact is, previously all the v2 sinks implement the update mode wrong. None of them can really support it.
2. kafka sink doesn't support complete mode. The fact is, the kafka sink can only append data.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#23859 from cloud-fan/update.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR introduces leveraging of subquery filters for partition pruning in file source.
Subquery expressions are not allowed to be used for partition pruning in `FileSourceStrategy` now, instead a `FilterExec` is added around the `FileSourceScanExec` to do the job.
This PR optimizes the process by allowing partition pruning subquery expressions as partition filters.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new UT and run existing UTs especially SPARK-25482 and SPARK-24085 related ones.
Closes#23802 from peter-toth/SPARK-26893.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reduce work in HDFSMetadataLogSuite test to possibly de-flake it.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests
Closes#23937 from srowen/SPARK-27032.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we can use `df.printSchema` to discover the schema information for a query. We should have a way to describe the output schema of a query using SQL interface.
Example:
DESCRIBE SELECT * FROM desc_table
DESCRIBE QUERY SELECT * FROM desc_table
```SQL
spark-sql> create table desc_table (c1 int comment 'c1-comment', c2 decimal comment 'c2-comment', c3 string);
spark-sql> desc select * from desc_table;
c1 int c1-comment
c2 decimal(10,0) c2-comment
c3 string NULL
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test under SQLQueryTestSuite and SparkSqlParserSuite
Closes#23883 from dilipbiswal/dkb_describe_query.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I see the following new warning from ANTR4 after SPARK-26215 after it added `SCHEMA` keyword in the reserved/unreserved list. This is a minor PR to cleanup the warning.
```
WARNING] warning(125): org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4:784:90: implicit definition of token SCHEMA in parser
[WARNING] .../apache/spark/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 [784:90]: implicit definition of token SCHEMA in parser
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manually built catalyst after the fix to verify
Closes#23897 from dilipbiswal/minor_parser_token.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Redundant `get` when getting a value from `Map` given a key.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#23901 from 10110346/removegetfrommap.
Authored-by: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add new Catalyst type converter for `DateType`. It should be able to convert `java.time.LocalDate` to/from `DateType`.
Main motivations for the changes:
- Smoothly support Java 8 time API
- Avoid inconsistency of calendars used inside of Spark 3.0 (Proleptic Gregorian calendar) and `java.sql.Date` (hybrid calendar - Julian + Gregorian).
- Make conversion independent from current system timezone.
By default, Spark converts values of `DateType` to `java.sql.Date` instances but the SQL config `spark.sql.datetime.java8API.enabled` can change the behavior. If it is set to `true`, Spark uses `java.time.LocalDate` as external type for `DateType`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new testes to `CatalystTypeConvertersSuite` to check conversion of `DateType` to/from `java.time.LocalDate`, `JavaUDFSuite`/ `UDFSuite` to test usage of `LocalDate` type in Scala/Java UDFs.
Closes#23913 from MaxGekk/date-localdate.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Continuous processing is waiting on epochs which are not yet complete (for example one partition is not making progress) and stores pending items in queues. These queues are unbounded and can consume up all the memory easily. In this PR I've added `spark.sql.streaming.continuous.epochBacklogQueueSize` configuration possibility to make them bounded. If the related threshold reached then the query will stop with `IllegalStateException`.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing + additional unit tests.
Closes#23156 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-24063.
Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Comparing whether Boolean expression is equal to true is redundant
For example:
The datatype of `a` is boolean.
Before:
if (a == true)
After:
if (a)
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#23884 from 10110346/simplifyboolean.
Authored-by: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add new Catalyst type converter for `TimestampType`. It should be able to convert `java.time.Instant` to/from `TimestampType`.
Main motivations for the changes:
- Smoothly support Java 8 time API
- Avoid inconsistency of calendars used inside of Spark 3.0 (Proleptic Gregorian calendar) and `java.sql.Timestamp` (hybrid calendar - Julian + Gregorian).
- Make conversion independent from current system timezone.
By default, Spark converts values of `TimestampType` to `java.sql.Timestamp` instances but the SQL config `spark.sql.catalyst.timestampType` can change the behavior. It accepts two values `Timestamp` (default) and `Instant`. If the former one is set, Spark returns `java.time.Instant` instances for timestamp values.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new testes to `CatalystTypeConvertersSuite` to check conversion of `TimestampType` to/from `java.time.Instant`.
Closes#23811 from MaxGekk/timestamp-instant.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
