## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When creating tuple expression encoders, we should give the serializer expressions of tuple items correct names, so we can have correct output schema when we use such tuple encoders.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Closes#21576 from viirya/SPARK-24548.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added a new JSON option `dropFieldIfAllNull ` to ignore column of all null values or empty array/struct during JSON schema inference.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `JsonSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Author: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
Closes#20929 from maropu/SPARK-23772.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The supported java.math.BigInteger type is not mentioned in the javadoc of Encoders.bean()
## How was this patch tested?
only Javadoc fix
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: James Yu <james@ispot.tv>
Closes#21544 from yuj/master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Provide an option to limit number of rows in a MemorySink. Currently, MemorySink and MemorySinkV2 have unbounded size, meaning that if they're used on big data, they can OOM the stream. This change adds a maxMemorySinkRows option to limit how many rows MemorySink and MemorySinkV2 can hold. By default, they are still unbounded.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new unit tests.
Author: Mukul Murthy <mukul.murthy@databricks.com>
Closes#21559 from mukulmurthy/SPARK-24525.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes possible overflow in int add or multiply. In particular, their overflows in multiply are detected by [Spotbugs](https://spotbugs.github.io/)
The following assignments may cause overflow in right hand side. As a result, the result may be negative.
```
long = int * int
long = int + int
```
To avoid this problem, this PR performs cast from int to long in right hand side.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21481 from kiszk/SPARK-24452.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `foreach` for streaming queries in Python. Users will be able to specify their processing logic in two different ways.
- As a function that takes a row as input.
- As an object that has methods `open`, `process`, and `close` methods.
See the python docs in this PR for more details.
## How was this patch tested?
Added java and python unit tests
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21477 from tdas/SPARK-24396.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This removes the v2 optimizer rule for push-down and instead pushes filters and required columns when converting to a physical plan, as suggested by marmbrus. This makes the v2 relation cleaner because the output and filters do not change in the logical plan.
A side-effect of this change is that the stats from the logical (optimized) plan no longer reflect pushed filters and projection. This is a temporary state, until the planner gathers stats from the physical plan instead. An alternative to this approach is 9d3a11e68b.
The first commit was proposed in #21262. This PR replaces #21262.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Closes#21503 from rdblue/SPARK-24478-move-push-down-to-physical-conversion.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to support any DataType represented as DDL string for the from_json function. After the changes, it will be possible to specify `MapType` in SQL like:
```sql
select from_json('{"a":1, "b":2}', 'map<string, int>')
```
and in Scala (similar in other languages)
```scala
val in = Seq("""{"a": {"b": 1}}""").toDS()
val schema = "map<string, map<string, int>>"
val out = in.select(from_json($"value", schema, Map.empty[String, String]))
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added a couple sql tests and modified existing tests for Python and Scala. The former tests were modified because it is not imported for them in which format schema for `from_json` is provided.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21550 from MaxGekk/from_json-ddl-schema.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`EnsureRequirement` in its `reorder` method currently assumes that the same key appears only once in the join condition. This of course might not be the case, and when it is not satisfied, it returns a wrong plan which produces a wrong result of the query.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21529 from mgaido91/SPARK-24495.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR updates the 2.3 version tested to the new release 2.3.1.
## How was this patch tested?
existing UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21543 from mgaido91/patch-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IL4kJoKrZWeyIhklKUJqsW-yEN7V7aL05MmM65AYOfE/edit
Implement continuous shuffle write RDD for a single reader partition. (I don't believe any implementation changes are actually required for multiple reader partitions, but this PR is already very large, so I want to exclude those for now to keep the size down.)
## How was this patch tested?
new unit tests
Author: Jose Torres <torres.joseph.f+github@gmail.com>
Closes#21428 from jose-torres/writerTask.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If you construct catalyst trees using `scala.collection.immutable.Stream` you can run into situations where valid transformations do not seem to have any effect. There are two causes for this behavior:
- `Stream` is evaluated lazily. Note that default implementation will generally only evaluate a function for the first element (this makes testing a bit tricky).
- `TreeNode` and `QueryPlan` use side effects to detect if a tree has changed. Mapping over a stream is lazy and does not need to trigger this side effect. If this happens the node will invalidly assume that it did not change and return itself instead if the newly created node (this is for GC reasons).
This PR fixes this issue by forcing materialization on streams in `TreeNode` and `QueryPlan`.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests were added to `TreeNodeSuite` and `LogicalPlanSuite`. An integration test was added to the `PlannerSuite`
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#21539 from hvanhovell/SPARK-24500.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently a "StreamingQueryListener" can only be registered programatically. We could have a new config "spark.sql.streamingQueryListeners" similar to "spark.sql.queryExecutionListeners" and "spark.extraListeners" for users to register custom streaming listeners.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit test and running example programs.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Arun Mahadevan <arunm@apache.org>
Closes#21504 from arunmahadevan/SPARK-24480.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch measures and logs elapsed time for each operation which communicate with file system (mostly remote HDFS in production) in HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider to help investigating any latency issue.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested.
Author: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Closes#21506 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-24485.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
TextSocketMicroBatchReader was no longer be compatible with netcat due to launching temporary reader for reading schema, and closing reader, and re-opening reader. While reliable socket server should be able to handle this without any issue, nc command normally can't handle multiple connections and simply exits when closing temporary reader.
This patch fixes TextSocketMicroBatchReader to be compatible with netcat again, via deferring opening socket to the first call of planInputPartitions() instead of constructor.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test which fails on current and succeeds with the patch. And also manually tested.
Author: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com>
Closes#21497 from HeartSaVioR/SPARK-24466.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables using a grouped aggregate pandas UDFs as window functions. The semantics is the same as using SQL aggregation function as window functions.
```
>>> from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf, PandasUDFType
>>> from pyspark.sql import Window
>>> df = spark.createDataFrame(
... [(1, 1.0), (1, 2.0), (2, 3.0), (2, 5.0), (2, 10.0)],
... ("id", "v"))
>>> pandas_udf("double", PandasUDFType.GROUPED_AGG)
... def mean_udf(v):
... return v.mean()
>>> w = Window.partitionBy('id')
>>> df.withColumn('mean_v', mean_udf(df['v']).over(w)).show()
+---+----+------+
| id| v|mean_v|
+---+----+------+
| 1| 1.0| 1.5|
| 1| 2.0| 1.5|
| 2| 3.0| 6.0|
| 2| 5.0| 6.0|
| 2|10.0| 6.0|
+---+----+------+
```
The scope of this PR is somewhat limited in terms of:
(1) Only supports unbounded window, which acts essentially as group by.
(2) Only supports aggregation functions, not "transform" like window functions (n -> n mapping)
Both of these are left as future work. Especially, (1) needs careful thinking w.r.t. how to pass rolling window data to python efficiently. (2) is a bit easier but does require more changes therefore I think it's better to leave it as a separate PR.
## How was this patch tested?
WindowPandasUDFTests
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Closes#21082 from icexelloss/SPARK-22239-window-udf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the SQL function `map_from_arrays`. The behavior of the function is based on Presto's `map`. Since SparkSQL already had a `map` function, we prepared the different name for this behavior.
This function returns returns a map from a pair of arrays for keys and values.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UTs
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes#21258 from kiszk/SPARK-23933.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When user create a aggregator object in scala and pass the aggregator to Spark Dataset's agg() method, Spark's will initialize TypedAggregateExpression with the nodeName field as aggregator.getClass.getSimpleName. However, getSimpleName is not safe in scala environment, depending on how user creates the aggregator object. For example, if the aggregator class full qualified name is "com.my.company.MyUtils$myAgg$2$", the getSimpleName will throw java.lang.InternalError "Malformed class name". This has been reported in scalatest https://github.com/scalatest/scalatest/pull/1044 and discussed in many scala upstream jiras such as SI-8110, SI-5425.
To fix this issue, we follow the solution in https://github.com/scalatest/scalatest/pull/1044 to add safer version of getSimpleName as a util method, and TypedAggregateExpression will invoke this util method rather than getClass.getSimpleName.
## How was this patch tested?
added unit test
Author: Fangshi Li <fli@linkedin.com>
Closes#21276 from fangshil/SPARK-24216.
Signed-off-by: DylanGuedes <djmgguedesgmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Addition of arrays_zip function to spark sql functions.
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
Unit tests that checks if the results are correct.
Author: DylanGuedes <djmgguedes@gmail.com>
Closes#21045 from DylanGuedes/SPARK-23931.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removing version 2.2.0 from testing versions in HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite as it is not present anymore in the mirrors and this is blocking all the open PRs.
## How was this patch tested?
running UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21540 from mgaido91/SPARK-24531.
no => no[t]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixing a typo.
## How was this patch tested?
Visual check of the docs.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Author: Tom Saleeba <tom.saleeba@gmail.com>
Closes#21496 from tomsaleeba/patch-1.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`UnsafeRowSerializerSuite` calls `UnsafeProjection.create` which accesses `SQLConf.get`, while the current active SparkSession may already be stopped, and we may hit exception like this
```
sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: java.lang.IllegalStateException: LiveListenerBus is stopped.
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.LiveListenerBus.addToQueue(LiveListenerBus.scala:97)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.LiveListenerBus.addToStatusQueue(LiveListenerBus.scala:80)
at org.apache.spark.sql.internal.SharedState.<init>(SharedState.scala:93)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$sharedState$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$sharedState$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:120)
at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sharedState$lzycompute(SparkSession.scala:120)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession.sharedState(SparkSession.scala:119)
at org.apache.spark.sql.internal.BaseSessionStateBuilder.build(BaseSessionStateBuilder.scala:286)
at org.apache.spark.sql.test.TestSparkSession.sessionState$lzycompute(TestSQLContext.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.sql.test.TestSparkSession.sessionState(TestSQLContext.scala:41)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$1$$anonfun$apply$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$1$$anonfun$apply$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:95)
at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:146)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession$$anonfun$1.apply(SparkSession.scala:94)
at org.apache.spark.sql.internal.SQLConf$.get(SQLConf.scala:126)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallback.createObject(CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallback.scala:54)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeProjection$.create(Projection.scala:157)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeProjection$.create(Projection.scala:150)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$UnsafeRowSerializerSuite$$unsafeRowConverter(UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.scala:54)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$UnsafeRowSerializerSuite$$toUnsafeRow(UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeRowSerializerSuite$$anonfun$2.apply(UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.scala:63)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeRowSerializerSuite$$anonfun$2.apply(UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.scala:60)
...
```
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#21518 from cloud-fan/test.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
when the length of pre-shuffle's partitions is 0, the length of post-shuffle's partitions should be 0 instead of spark.sql.shuffle.partitions.
## How was this patch tested?
ExchangeCoordinator converted a pre-shuffle that partitions is 0 to a post-shuffle that partitions is 0 instead of one that partitions is spark.sql.shuffle.partitions.
Author: liutang123 <liutang123@yeah.net>
Closes#19364 from liutang123/SPARK-22144.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SPARK-22036 we introduced the possibility to allow precision loss in arithmetic operations (according to the SQL standard). The implementation was drawn from Hive's one, where Decimals with a negative scale are not allowed in the operations.
The PR handles the case when the scale is negative, removing the assertion that it is not.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21499 from mgaido91/SPARK-24468.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update documentation for `isInCollection` API to clealy explain the "auto-casting" of elements if their types are different.
## How was this patch tested?
No-Op
Author: Thiruvasakan Paramasivan <thiru@apple.com>
Closes#21519 from trvskn/sql-doc-update.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implemented eval in SortPrefix expression.
## How was this patch tested?
- ran existing sbt SQL tests
- added unit test
- ran existing Python SQL tests
- manual tests: disabling codegen -- patching code to disable beyond what spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage=false can do -- and running sbt SQL tests
Author: Bruce Robbins <bersprockets@gmail.com>
Closes#21231 from bersprockets/sortprefixeval.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
support bucket pruning when filtering on a single bucketed column on the following predicates -
EqualTo, EqualNullSafe, In, And/Or predicates
## How was this patch tested?
refactored unit tests to test the above.
based on gatorsmile work in e3c75c6398
Author: Asher Saban <asaban@palantir.com>
Author: asaban <asaban@palantir.com>
Closes#20915 from sabanas/filter-prune-buckets.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Sql below will get all partitions from metastore, which put much burden on metastore;
```
CREATE TABLE `partition_test`(`col` int) PARTITIONED BY (`pt` byte)
SELECT * FROM partition_test WHERE CAST(pt AS INT)=1
```
The reason is that the the analyzed attribute `dt` is wrapped in `Cast` and `HiveShim` fails to generate a proper partition filter.
This pr proposes to take `Cast` into consideration when generate partition filter.
## How was this patch tested?
Test added.
This pr proposes to use analyzed expressions in `HiveClientSuite`
Author: jinxing <jinxing6042@126.com>
Closes#19602 from jinxing64/SPARK-22384.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The error occurs when we are recovering from a failure in a no-data batch (say X) that has been planned (i.e. written to offset log) but not executed (i.e. not written to commit log). Upon recovery the following sequence of events happen.
1. `MicroBatchExecution.populateStartOffsets` sets `currentBatchId` to X. Since there was no data in the batch, the `availableOffsets` is same as `committedOffsets`, so `isNewDataAvailable` is `false`.
2. When `MicroBatchExecution.constructNextBatch` is called, ideally it should immediately return true because the next batch has already been constructed. However, the check of whether the batch has been constructed was `if (isNewDataAvailable) return true`. Since the planned batch is a no-data batch, it escaped this check and proceeded to plan the same batch X *once again*.
The solution is to have an explicit flag that signifies whether a batch has already been constructed or not. `populateStartOffsets` is going to set the flag appropriately.
## How was this patch tested?
new unit test
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#21491 from tdas/SPARK-24453.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR explicitly prohibits window functions inside aggregates. Currently, this will cause StackOverflow during analysis. See PR #19193 for previous discussion.
## How was this patch tested?
This PR comes with a dedicated unit test.
Author: aokolnychyi <anton.okolnychyi@sap.com>
Closes#21473 from aokolnychyi/fix-stackoverflow-window-funcs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for date `extract` function:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR FROM TIMESTAMP '2000-12-16 12:21:13');
2000
```
Supported field same as [Hive](https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/rel/release-2.3.3/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/IdentifiersParser.g#L308-L316): `YEAR`, `QUARTER`, `MONTH`, `WEEK`, `DAY`, `DAYOFWEEK`, `HOUR`, `MINUTE`, `SECOND`.
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21479 from wangyum/SPARK-23903.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently column names of headers in CSV files are not checked against provided schema of CSV data. It could cause errors like showed in the [SPARK-23786](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23786) and https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20894#issuecomment-375957777. I introduced new CSV option - `enforceSchema`. If it is enabled (by default `true`), Spark forcibly applies provided or inferred schema to CSV files. In that case, CSV headers are ignored and not checked against the schema. If `enforceSchema` is set to `false`, additional checks can be performed. For example, if column in CSV header and in the schema have different ordering, the following exception is thrown:
```
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: CSV file header does not contain the expected fields
Header: depth, temperature
Schema: temperature, depth
CSV file: marina.csv
```
## How was this patch tested?
The changes were tested by existing tests of CSVSuite and by 2 new tests.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Author: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Closes#20894 from MaxGekk/check-column-names.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
bring back https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21443
This is a different approach: just change the check to count distinct columns with `toSet`
## How was this patch tested?
a new test to verify the planner behavior.
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21487 from cloud-fan/back.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Compute the thresholdBatchId to purge metadata based on current committed epoch instead of currentBatchId in CP mode to avoid cleaning all the committed metadata in some case as described in the jira [SPARK-24351](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24351).
## How was this patch tested?
Add new unit test.
Author: Huang Tengfei <tengfei.h@gmail.com>
Closes#21400 from ivoson/branch-cp-meta.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add array_remove to remove all elements that equal element from array
## How was this patch tested?
add unit tests
Author: Huaxin Gao <huaxing@us.ibm.com>
Closes#21069 from huaxingao/spark-23920.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Refactor ExecuteWriteTask in FileFormatWriter to reduce common logic and improve readability.
After the change, callers only need to call `commit()` or `abort` at the end of task.
Also there is less code in `SingleDirectoryWriteTask` and `DynamicPartitionWriteTask`.
Definitions of related classes are moved to a new file, and `ExecuteWriteTask` is renamed to `FileFormatDataWriter`.
2. As per code style guide: https://github.com/databricks/scala-style-guide#traversal-and-zipwithindex , we avoid using `for` for looping in [FileFormatWriter](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21381/files#diff-3b69eb0963b68c65cfe8075f8a42e850L536) , or `foreach` in [WriteToDataSourceV2Exec](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21381/files#diff-6fbe10db766049a395bae2e785e9d56eL119).
In such critical code path, using `while` is good for performance.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit test.
I tried the microbenchmark in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21409
| Workload | Before changes(Best/Avg Time(ms)) | After changes(Best/Avg Time(ms)) |
| --- | --- | -- |
|Output Single Int Column| 2018 / 2043 | 2096 / 2236 |
|Output Single Double Column| 1978 / 2043 | 2013 / 2018 |
|Output Int and String Column| 6332 / 6706 | 6162 / 6298 |
|Output Partitions| 4458 / 5094 | 3792 / 4008 |
|Output Buckets| 5695 / 6102 | 5120 / 5154 |
Also a microbenchmark on my laptop for general comparison among while/foreach/for :
```
class Writer {
var sum = 0L
def write(l: Long): Unit = sum += l
}
def testWhile(iterator: Iterator[Long]): Long = {
val w = new Writer
while (iterator.hasNext) {
w.write(iterator.next())
}
w.sum
}
def testForeach(iterator: Iterator[Long]): Long = {
val w = new Writer
iterator.foreach(w.write)
w.sum
}
def testFor(iterator: Iterator[Long]): Long = {
val w = new Writer
for (x <- iterator) {
w.write(x)
}
w.sum
}
val data = 0L to 100000000L
val start = System.nanoTime
(0 to 10).foreach(_ => testWhile(data.iterator))
println("benchmark while: " + (System.nanoTime - start)/1000000)
val start2 = System.nanoTime
(0 to 10).foreach(_ => testForeach(data.iterator))
println("benchmark foreach: " + (System.nanoTime - start2)/1000000)
val start3 = System.nanoTime
(0 to 10).foreach(_ => testForeach(data.iterator))
println("benchmark for: " + (System.nanoTime - start3)/1000000)
```
Benchmark result:
`while`: 15401 ms
`foreach`: 43034 ms
`for`: 41279 ms
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21381 from gengliangwang/refactorExecuteWriteTask.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`format_number` support user specifed format as argument. For example:
```sql
spark-sql> SELECT format_number(12332.123456, '##################.###');
12332.123
```
## How was this patch tested?
unit test
Author: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Closes#21010 from wangyum/SPARK-23900.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When two `In` operators are created with the same list of values, but different order, we are considering them as semantically different. This is wrong, since they have the same semantic meaning.
The PR adds a canonicalization rule which orders the literals in the `In` operator so the semantic equality works properly.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21331 from mgaido91/SPARK-24276.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the masking function as they are described in Hive's documentation: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+UDF#LanguageManualUDF-DataMaskingFunctions.
This means that only `string`s are accepted as parameter for the masking functions.
## How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21246 from mgaido91/SPARK-23901.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed an issue when having multiple distinct aggregations having the same argument set, e.g.,
```
scala>: paste
val df = sql(
s"""SELECT corr(DISTINCT x, y), corr(DISTINCT y, x), count(*)
| FROM (VALUES (1, 1), (2, 2), (2, 2)) t(x, y)
""".stripMargin)
java.lang.RuntimeException
You hit a query analyzer bug. Please report your query to Spark user mailing list.
```
The root cause is that `RewriteDistinctAggregates` can't detect multiple distinct aggregations if they have the same argument set. This pr modified code so that `RewriteDistinctAggregates` could count the number of aggregate expressions with `isDistinct=true`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in `DataFrameAggregateSuite`.
Author: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Closes#21443 from maropu/SPARK-24369.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Data Source write benchmark. So that it would be easier to measure the writer performance.
Author: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Closes#21409 from gengliangwang/parquetWriteBenchmark.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implemented **`isInCollection `** in DataFrame API for both Scala and Java, so users can do
```scala
val profileDF = Seq(
Some(1), Some(2), Some(3), Some(4),
Some(5), Some(6), Some(7), None
).toDF("profileID")
val validUsers: Seq[Any] = Seq(6, 7.toShort, 8L, "3")
val result = profileDF.withColumn("isValid", $"profileID". isInCollection(validUsers))
result.show(10)
"""
+---------+-------+
|profileID|isValid|
+---------+-------+
| 1| false|
| 2| false|
| 3| true|
| 4| false|
| 5| false|
| 6| true|
| 7| true|
| null| null|
+---------+-------+
""".stripMargin
```
## How was this patch tested?
Several unit tests are added.
Author: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
Closes#21416 from dbtsai/optimize-set.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should not stop users from calling `getActiveSession` and `getDefaultSession` in executors. To not break the existing behaviors, we should simply return None.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Xiao Li <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#21436 from gatorsmile/followUpSPARK-24250.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Random.nextString` is good for generating random string data, but it's not proper for directory name prefix in `Utils.createDirectory(tempDir, Random.nextString(10))`. This PR uses more safe directory namePrefix.
```scala
scala> scala.util.Random.nextString(10)
res0: String = 馨쭔ᎰႻ穚䃈兩㻞藑並
```
```scala
StateStoreRDDSuite:
- versioning and immutability
- recovering from files
- usage with iterators - only gets and only puts
- preferred locations using StateStoreCoordinator *** FAILED ***
java.io.IOException: Failed to create a temp directory (under /.../spark/sql/core/target/tmp/StateStoreRDDSuite8712796397908632676) after 10 attempts!
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.createDirectory(Utils.scala:295)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.StateStoreRDDSuite$$anonfun$13$$anonfun$apply$6.apply(StateStoreRDDSuite.scala:152)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.StateStoreRDDSuite$$anonfun$13$$anonfun$apply$6.apply(StateStoreRDDSuite.scala:149)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.package$.quietly(package.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.StateStoreRDDSuite$$anonfun$13.apply(StateStoreRDDSuite.scala:149)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.state.StateStoreRDDSuite$$anonfun$13.apply(StateStoreRDDSuite.scala:149)
...
- distributed test *** FAILED ***
java.io.IOException: Failed to create a temp directory (under /.../spark/sql/core/target/tmp/StateStoreRDDSuite8712796397908632676) after 10 attempts!
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.createDirectory(Utils.scala:295)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the existing tests.StateStoreRDDSuite:
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#21446 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-19613.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we create a `RelationalGroupedDataset` or a `KeyValueGroupedDataset` we set its child to the `logicalPlan` of the `DataFrame` we need to aggregate. Since the `logicalPlan` is already analyzed, we should not analyze it again. But this happens when the new plan of the aggregate is analyzed.
The current behavior in most of the cases is likely to produce no harm, but in other cases re-analyzing an analyzed plan can change it, since the analysis is not idempotent. This can cause issues like the one described in the JIRA (missing to find a cached plan).
The PR adds an `AnalysisBarrier` to the `logicalPlan` which is used as child of `RelationalGroupedDataset` or a `KeyValueGroupedDataset`.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Author: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Closes#21432 from mgaido91/SPARK-24373.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is a race condition of closing Arrow VectorSchemaRoot and Allocator in the writer thread of ArrowPythonRunner.
The race results in memory leak exception when closing the allocator. This patch removes the closing routine from the TaskCompletionListener and make the writer thread responsible for cleaning up the Arrow memory.
This issue be reproduced by this test:
```
def test_memory_leak(self):
from pyspark.sql.functions import pandas_udf, col, PandasUDFType, array, lit, explode
# Have all data in a single executor thread so it can trigger the race condition easier
with self.sql_conf({'spark.sql.shuffle.partitions': 1}):
df = self.spark.range(0, 1000)
df = df.withColumn('id', array([lit(i) for i in range(0, 300)])) \
.withColumn('id', explode(col('id'))) \
.withColumn('v', array([lit(i) for i in range(0, 1000)]))
pandas_udf(df.schema, PandasUDFType.GROUPED_MAP)
def foo(pdf):
xxx
return pdf
result = df.groupby('id').apply(foo)
with QuietTest(self.sc):
with self.assertRaises(py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError) as context:
result.count()
self.assertTrue('Memory leaked' not in str(context.exception))
```
Note: Because of the race condition, the test case cannot reproduce the issue reliably so it's not added to test cases.
## How was this patch tested?
Because of the race condition, the bug cannot be unit test easily. So far it has only happens on large amount of data. This is currently tested manually.
Author: Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com>
Closes#21397 from icexelloss/SPARK-24334-arrow-memory-leak.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds several unit tests along the `cols NOT IN (subquery)` pathway. There are a scattering of tests here and there which cover this codepath, but there doesn't seem to be a unified unit test of the correctness of null-aware anti joins anywhere. I have also added a brief explanation of how this expression behaves in SubquerySuite. Lastly, I made some clarifying changes in the NOT IN pathway in RewritePredicateSubquery.
## How was this patch tested?
Added unit tests! There should be no behavioral change in this PR.
Author: Miles Yucht <miles@databricks.com>
Closes#21425 from mgyucht/spark-24381.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, users are getting the following error messages on type conversions:
```
scala.MatchError: test (of class java.lang.String)
```
The message doesn't give any clues to the users where in the schema the error happened. In this PR, I would like to improve the error message like:
```
The value (test) of the type (java.lang.String) cannot be converted to struct<f1:int>
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests for converting of wrong values to `struct`, `map`, `array`, `string` and `decimal`.
Author: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Closes#21410 from MaxGekk/type-conv-error.
