JVMs can't allocate arrays of length exactly Int.MaxValue, so ensure we never try to allocate an array that big. This commit changes some defaults & configs to gracefully fallover to something that doesn't require one large array in some cases; in other cases it simply improves an error message for cases which will still fail.
Closes#22818 from squito/SPARK-25827.
Authored-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix for `CsvToStructs` to take into account SQL config `spark.sql.columnNameOfCorruptRecord` similar to `from_json`.
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test where `spark.sql.columnNameOfCorruptRecord` is set to corrupt column name different from default.
Closes#22956 from MaxGekk/csv-tests.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As per the discussion in [#22823](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22823/files#r228400706), add a new configuration to make the split threshold for the code generated function configurable.
When the generated Java function source code exceeds `spark.sql.codegen.methodSplitThreshold`, it will be split into multiple small functions.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22847 from yucai/splitThreshold.
Authored-by: yucai <yyu1@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
New functions takes a struct and converts it to a CSV strings using passed CSV options. It accepts the same CSV options as CSV data source does.
## How was this patch tested?
Added `CsvExpressionsSuite`, `CsvFunctionsSuite` as well as R, Python and SQL tests similar to tests for `to_json()`
Closes#22626 from MaxGekk/to_csv.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
a followup of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22749.
When we construct the new serializer in `ExpressionEncoder.tuple`, we don't need to add `if(isnull ...)` check for each field. They are either simple expressions that can propagate null correctly(e.g. `GetStructField(GetColumnByOrdinal(0, schema), index)`), or complex expression that already have the isnull check.
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#22898 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to add new function - *schema_of_csv()* which infers schema of CSV string literal. The result of the function is a string containing a schema in DDL format. For example:
```sql
select schema_of_csv('1|abc', map('delimiter', '|'))
```
```
struct<_c0:int,_c1:string>
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests to `CsvFunctionsSuite`, `CsvExpressionsSuite` and SQL tests to `csv-functions.sql`
Closes#22666 from MaxGekk/schema_of_csv-function.
Lead-authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes a new optimization rule that replaces `Literal(null, _)` with `FalseLiteral` in conditions in `Join` and `Filter`, predicates in `If`, conditions in `CaseWhen`.
The idea is that some expressions evaluate to `false` if the underlying expression is `null` (as an example see `GeneratePredicate$create` or `doGenCode` and `eval` methods in `If` and `CaseWhen`). Therefore, we can replace `Literal(null, _)` with `FalseLiteral`, which can lead to more optimizations later on.
Let’s consider a few examples.
```
val df = spark.range(1, 100).select($"id".as("l"), ($"id" > 50).as("b"))
df.createOrReplaceTempView("t")
df.createOrReplaceTempView("p")
```
**Case 1**
```
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM t WHERE if(l > 10, false, NULL)").explain(true)
// without the new rule
…
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
+- Filter if ((id#0L > 10)) false else null
+- Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=Some(12))
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
+- *(1) Filter if ((id#0L > 10)) false else null
+- *(1) Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=12)
// with the new rule
…
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
LocalRelation <empty>, [l#2L, s#3]
== Physical Plan ==
LocalTableScan <empty>, [l#2L, s#3]
```
**Case 2**
```
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM t WHERE CASE WHEN l < 10 THEN null WHEN l > 40 THEN false ELSE null END”).explain(true)
// without the new rule
...
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
+- Filter CASE WHEN (id#0L < 10) THEN null WHEN (id#0L > 40) THEN false ELSE null END
+- Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=Some(12))
== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
+- *(1) Filter CASE WHEN (id#0L < 10) THEN null WHEN (id#0L > 40) THEN false ELSE null END
+- *(1) Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=12)
// with the new rule
...
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
LocalRelation <empty>, [l#2L, s#3]
== Physical Plan ==
LocalTableScan <empty>, [l#2L, s#3]
```
**Case 3**
```
spark.sql("SELECT * FROM t JOIN p ON IF(t.l > p.l, null, false)").explain(true)
// without the new rule
...
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Join Inner, if ((l#2L > l#37L)) null else false
:- Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
: +- Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=Some(12))
+- Project [id#0L AS l#37L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#38]
+- Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=Some(12))
== Physical Plan ==
BroadcastNestedLoopJoin BuildRight, Inner, if ((l#2L > l#37L)) null else false
:- *(1) Project [id#0L AS l#2L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#3]
: +- *(1) Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=12)
+- BroadcastExchange IdentityBroadcastMode
+- *(2) Project [id#0L AS l#37L, cast(id#0L as string) AS s#38]
+- *(2) Range (1, 100, step=1, splits=12)
// with the new rule
...
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
LocalRelation <empty>, [l#2L, s#3, l#37L, s#38]
```
## How was this patch tested?
This PR comes with a set of dedicated tests.
Closes#22857 from aokolnychyi/spark-25860.
Authored-by: Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnychyi@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: DB Tsai <d_tsai@apple.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently in `FailureSafeParser` and `from_avro`, the exception is created with such code
```
throw new SparkException("Malformed records are detected in record parsing. " +
s"Parse Mode: ${FailFastMode.name}.", e.cause)
```
1. The cause part should be `e` instead of `e.cause`
2. If `e` contains non-null message, it should be shown in `from_json`/`from_csv`/`from_avro`, e.g.
```
com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParseException: Unexpected character ('1' (code 49)): was expecting a colon to separate field name and value
at [Source: (InputStreamReader); line: 1, column: 7]
```
3.Kindly show hint for trying PERMISSIVE in error message.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Closes#22895 from gengliangwang/improve_error_msg.
Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang.wang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch removes the rangeBetween functions introduced in SPARK-21608. As explained in SPARK-25841, these functions are confusing and don't quite work. We will redesign them and introduce better ones in SPARK-25843.
## How was this patch tested?
Removed relevant test cases as well. These test cases will need to be added back in SPARK-25843.
Closes#22870 from rxin/SPARK-25862.
Lead-authored-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we compare attributes, in general, we should always refer to semantic equality, as the default `equal` method can return false when there are "cosmetic" differences between them, but still they are the same thing; at least we have to consider them so when analyzing/optimizing queries.
The PR focuses on the usage and comparison of the `output` of a `LogicalPlan`, which is a `Seq[Attribute]` in `AliasViewChild`. In this case, using equality implicitly fails to check the semantic equality. This results in the operator failing to stabilize.
## How was this patch tested?
running the tests with the patch provided by maryannxue in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22060Closes#22713 from mgaido91/SPARK-25691.
Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to avoid hardcorded configuration keys in SQLConf's `doc.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually verified.
Closes#22877 from HyukjinKwon/minor-conf-name.
Authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These two classes were added for regr_ expression support (SPARK-23907). These have been removed and hence we can remove these base classes and inline the logic in the concrete classes.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22856 from dilipbiswal/average_cleanup.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set main args correctly in BenchmarkBase, to make it accessible for its subclass.
It will benefit:
- BuiltInDataSourceWriteBenchmark
- AvroWriteBenchmark
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22872 from yucai/main_args.
Authored-by: yucai <yyu1@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Extractors are made of 2 expressions, one of them defines the the value to be extract from (called `child`) and the other defines the way of extraction (called `extraction`). In this term extractors have 2 children so they shouldn't be `UnaryExpression`s.
`ResolveReferences` was changed in this commit: 36b826f5d1 which resulted a regression with nested extractors. An extractor need to define its children as the set of both `child` and `extraction`; and should try to resolve both in `ResolveReferences`.
This PR changes `UnresolvedExtractValue` to a `BinaryExpression`.
## How was this patch tested?
added UT
Closes#22817 from peter-toth/SPARK-25816.
Authored-by: Peter Toth <peter.toth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
WindowSpecDefinition checks start < last, but CalendarIntervalType is not comparable, so it would throw the following exception at runtime:
```
scala.MatchError: CalendarIntervalType (of class org.apache.spark.sql.types.CalendarIntervalType$) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.TypeUtils$.getInterpretedOrdering(TypeUtils.scala:58) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BinaryComparison.ordering$lzycompute(predicates.scala:592) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BinaryComparison.ordering(predicates.scala:592) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GreaterThan.nullSafeEval(predicates.scala:797) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BinaryExpression.eval(Expression.scala:496) at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SpecifiedWindowFrame.isGreaterThan(windowExpressions.scala:245) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.SpecifiedWindowFrame.checkInputDataTypes(windowExpressions.scala:216) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression.resolved$lzycompute(Expression.scala:171) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression.resolved(Expression.scala:171) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression$$anonfun$childrenResolved$1.apply(Expression.scala:183) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression$$anonfun$childrenResolved$1.apply(Expression.scala:183) at
scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized$class.prefixLengthImpl(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:38) at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized$class.forall(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:43) at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.forall(ArrayBuffer.scala:48) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression.childrenResolved(Expression.scala:183) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.WindowSpecDefinition.resolved$lzycompute(windowExpressions.scala:48) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.WindowSpecDefinition.resolved(windowExpressions.scala:48) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression$$anonfun$childrenResolved$1.apply(Expression.scala:183) at
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression$$anonfun$childrenResolved$1.apply(Expression.scala:183) at
scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized$class.forall(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:83)
```
We fix the issue by only perform the check on boundary expressions that are AtomicType.
## How was this patch tested?
Add new test case in `DataFrameWindowFramesSuite`
Closes#22853 from jiangxb1987/windowBoundary.
Authored-by: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Xingbo Jiang <xingbo.jiang@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22745 , Dataset encoder supports the combination of java bean and map type. This PR is to fix the Scala side.
The reason why it didn't work before is, `CatalystToExternalMap` tries to get the data type of the input map expression, while it can be unresolved and its data type is known. To fix it, we can follow `UnresolvedMapObjects`, to create a `UnresolvedCatalystToExternalMap`, and only create `CatalystToExternalMap` when the input map expression is resolved and the data type is known.
## How was this patch tested?
enable a old test case
Closes#22812 from cloud-fan/map.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implements Every, Some, Any aggregates in SQL. These new aggregate expressions are analyzed in normal way and rewritten to equivalent existing aggregate expressions in the optimizer.
Every(x) => Min(x) where x is boolean.
Some(x) => Max(x) where x is boolean.
Any is a synonym for Some.
SQL
```
explain extended select every(v) from test_agg group by k;
```
Plan :
```
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Aggregate ['k], [unresolvedalias('every('v), None)]
+- 'UnresolvedRelation `test_agg`
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
every(v): boolean
Aggregate [k#0], [every(v#1) AS every(v)#5]
+- SubqueryAlias `test_agg`
+- Project [k#0, v#1]
+- SubqueryAlias `test_agg`
+- LocalRelation [k#0, v#1]
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Aggregate [k#0], [min(v#1) AS every(v)#5]
+- LocalRelation [k#0, v#1]
== Physical Plan ==
*(2) HashAggregate(keys=[k#0], functions=[min(v#1)], output=[every(v)#5])
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(k#0, 200)
+- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[k#0], functions=[partial_min(v#1)], output=[k#0, min#7])
+- LocalTableScan [k#0, v#1]
Time taken: 0.512 seconds, Fetched 1 row(s)
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added tests in SQLQueryTestSuite, DataframeAggregateSuite
Closes#22809 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-19851-specific-rewrite.
Authored-by: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The main purpose of `schema_of_json` is the usage of combination with `from_json` (to make up the leak of schema inference) which takes its schema only as literal; however, currently `schema_of_json` allows JSON input as non-literal expressions (e.g, column).
This was mistakenly allowed - we don't have to take other usages rather then the main purpose into account for now.
This PR makes a followup to only allow literals for `schema_of_json`'s JSON input. We can allow non literal expressions later when it's needed or there are some usecase for it.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests were added.
Closes#22775 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-25447-followup.
Lead-authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22745 we introduced the `GetArrayFromMap` expression. Later on I realized this is duplicated as we already have `MapKeys` and `MapValues`.
This PR removes `GetArrayFromMap`
## How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Closes#22825 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is inspired during implementing #21732. For now `ScalaReflection` needs to consider how `ExpressionEncoder` uses generated serializers and deserializers. And `ExpressionEncoder` has a weird `flat` flag. After discussion with cloud-fan, it seems to be better to refactor `ExpressionEncoder`. It should make SPARK-24762 easier to do.
To summarize the proposed changes:
1. `serializerFor` and `deserializerFor` return expressions for serializing/deserializing an input expression for a given type. They are private and should not be called directly.
2. `serializerForType` and `deserializerForType` returns an expression for serializing/deserializing for an object of type T to/from Spark SQL representation. It assumes the input object/Spark SQL representation is located at ordinal 0 of a row.
So in other words, `serializerForType` and `deserializerForType` return expressions for atomically serializing/deserializing JVM object to/from Spark SQL value.
A serializer returned by `serializerForType` will serialize an object at `row(0)` to a corresponding Spark SQL representation, e.g. primitive type, array, map, struct.
A deserializer returned by `deserializerForType` will deserialize an input field at `row(0)` to an object with given type.
3. The construction of `ExpressionEncoder` takes a pair of serializer and deserializer for type `T`. It uses them to create serializer and deserializer for T <-> row serialization. Now `ExpressionEncoder` dones't need to remember if serializer is flat or not. When we need to construct new `ExpressionEncoder` based on existing ones, we only need to change input location in the atomic serializer and deserializer.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Closes#22749 from viirya/SPARK-24762-refactor.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Check the `spark.sql.repl.eagerEval.enabled` configuration property in SparkDataFrame `show()` method. If the `SparkSession` has eager execution enabled, the data will be returned to the R client when the data frame is created. So instead of seeing this
```
> df <- createDataFrame(faithful)
> df
SparkDataFrame[eruptions:double, waiting:double]
```
you will see
```
> df <- createDataFrame(faithful)
> df
+---------+-------+
|eruptions|waiting|
+---------+-------+
| 3.6| 79.0|
| 1.8| 54.0|
| 3.333| 74.0|
| 2.283| 62.0|
| 4.533| 85.0|
| 2.883| 55.0|
| 4.7| 88.0|
| 3.6| 85.0|
| 1.95| 51.0|
| 4.35| 85.0|
| 1.833| 54.0|
| 3.917| 84.0|
| 4.2| 78.0|
| 1.75| 47.0|
| 4.7| 83.0|
| 2.167| 52.0|
| 1.75| 62.0|
| 4.8| 84.0|
| 1.6| 52.0|
| 4.25| 79.0|
+---------+-------+
only showing top 20 rows
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manual tests as well as unit tests (one new test case is added).
Author: adrian555 <v2ave10p>
Closes#22455 from adrian555/eager_execution.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to switch `from_json` on `FailureSafeParser`, and to make the function compatible to `PERMISSIVE` mode by default, and to support the `FAILFAST` mode as well. The `DROPMALFORMED` mode is not supported by `from_json`.
## How was this patch tested?
It was tested by existing `JsonSuite`/`CSVSuite`, `JsonFunctionsSuite` and `JsonExpressionsSuite` as well as new tests for `from_json` which checks different modes.
Closes#22237 from MaxGekk/from_json-failuresafe.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
This is a follow-up PR for #22708. It considers another case of java beans deserialization: java maps with struct keys/values.
When deserializing values of MapType with struct keys/values in java beans, fields of structs get mixed up. I suggest using struct data types retrieved from resolved input data instead of inferring them from java beans.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Invocations of "keyArray" and "valueArray" functions are used to extract arrays of keys and values. Struct type of keys or values is also inferred from java bean structure and ends up with mixed up field order.
I created a new UnresolvedInvoke expression as a temporary substitution of Invoke expression while no actual data is available. It allows to provide the resulting data type during analysis based on the resolved input data, not on the java bean (similar to UnresolvedMapObjects).
Key and value arrays are then fed to MapObjects expression which I replaced with UnresolvedMapObjects, just like in case of ArrayType.
Finally I added resolution of UnresolvedInvoke expressions in Analyzer.resolveExpression method as an additional pattern matching case.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test case.
Built complete project on travis.
viirya kiszk cloud-fan michalsenkyr marmbrus liancheng
Closes#22745 from vofque/SPARK-21402-FOLLOWUP.
Lead-authored-by: Vladimir Kuriatkov <vofque@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Kuriatkov <Vladimir_Kuriatkov@epam.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The serializers of `RowEncoder` use few `If` Catalyst expression which inherits `ComplexTypeMergingExpression` that will check input data types.
It is possible to generate serializers which fail the check and can't to access the data type of serializers. When producing If expression, we should use the same data type at its input expressions.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Closes#22785 from viirya/SPARK-25791.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This takes over original PR at #22019. The original proposal is to have null for float and double types. Later a more reasonable proposal is to disallow empty strings. This patch adds logic to throw exception when finding empty strings for non string types.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test.
Closes#22787 from viirya/SPARK-25040.
Authored-by: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `prettyNames` for `from_json`, `to_json`, `from_csv`, and `schema_of_json` so that appropriate names are used.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Closes#22773 from HyukjinKwon/minor-prettyNames.
Authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SQL interface support specify `StorageLevel` when cache table. The semantic is:
```sql
CACHE TABLE tableName OPTIONS('storageLevel' 'DISK_ONLY');
```
All supported `StorageLevel` are:
eefdf9f9dd/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/StorageLevel.scala (L172-L183)
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests and manual tests.
manual tests configuration:
```
--executor-memory 15G --executor-cores 5 --num-executors 50
```
Data:
Input Size / Records: 1037.7 GB / 11732805788
Result:
Closes#22263 from wangyum/SPARK-25269.
Authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up PR for #22259. The extra field added in `ScalaUDF` with the original PR was declared optional, but should be indeed required, otherwise callers of `ScalaUDF`'s constructor could ignore this new field and cause the result to be incorrect. This PR makes the new field required and changes its name to `handleNullForInputs`.
#22259 breaks the previous behavior for null-handling of primitive-type input parameters. For example, for `val f = udf({(x: Int, y: Any) => x})`, `f(null, "str")` should return `null` but would return `0` after #22259. In this PR, all UDF methods except `def udf(f: AnyRef, dataType: DataType): UserDefinedFunction` have been restored with the original behavior. The only exception is documented in the Spark SQL migration guide.
In addition, now that we have this extra field indicating if a null-test should be applied on the corresponding input value, we can also make use of this flag to avoid the rule `HandleNullInputsForUDF` being applied infinitely.
## How was this patch tested?
Added UT in UDFSuite
Passed affected existing UTs:
AnalysisSuite
UDFSuite
Closes#22732 from maryannxue/spark-25044-followup.
Lead-authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Co-authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
CSVs with windows style crlf ('\r\n') don't work in multiline mode. They work fine in single line mode because the line separation is done by Hadoop, which can handle all the different types of line separators. This PR fixes it by enabling Univocity's line separator detection in multiline mode, which will detect '\r\n', '\r', or '\n' automatically as it is done by hadoop in single line mode.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test with a file with crlf line endings.
Closes#22503 from justinuang/fix-clrf-multiline.
Authored-by: Justin Uang <juang@palantir.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
When deserializing values of ArrayType with struct elements in java beans, fields of structs get mixed up.
I suggest using struct data types retrieved from resolved input data instead of inferring them from java beans.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
MapObjects expression is used to map array elements to java beans. Struct type of elements is inferred from java bean structure and ends up with mixed up field order.
I used UnresolvedMapObjects instead of MapObjects, which allows to provide element type for MapObjects during analysis based on the resolved input data, not on the java bean.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test case.
Built complete project on travis.
michalsenkyr cloud-fan marmbrus liancheng
Closes#22708 from vofque/SPARK-21402.
Lead-authored-by: Vladimir Kuriatkov <vofque@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Kuriatkov <Vladimir_Kuriatkov@epam.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
this PR correct some comment error:
1. change from "as low a possible" to "as low as possible" in RewriteDistinctAggregates.scala
2. delete redundant word “with” in HiveTableScanExec’s doExecute() method
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Closes#22694 from CarolinePeng/update_comment.
Authored-by: 彭灿00244106 <00244106@zte.intra>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Literal.value` should have a value a value corresponding to `dataType`. This pr added code to verify it and fixed the existing tests to do so.
## How was this patch tested?
Modified the existing tests.
Closes#22724 from maropu/SPARK-25734.
Authored-by: Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds new function `from_csv()` similar to `from_json()` to parse columns with CSV strings. I added the following methods:
```Scala
def from_csv(e: Column, schema: StructType, options: Map[String, String]): Column
```
and this signature to call it from Python, R and Java:
```Scala
def from_csv(e: Column, schema: String, options: java.util.Map[String, String]): Column
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new test suites `CsvExpressionsSuite`, `CsvFunctionsSuite` and sql tests.
Closes#22379 from MaxGekk/from_csv.
Lead-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AFAIK multi-column count is not widely supported by the mainstream databases(postgres doesn't support), and the SQL standard doesn't define it clearly, as near as I can tell.
Since Spark supports it, we should clearly document the current behavior and add tests to verify it.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22728 from cloud-fan/doc.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Project logical operator generates valid constraints using two opposite operations. It substracts child constraints from all constraints, than union child constraints again. I think it may be not necessary.
Aggregate operator has the same problem with Project.
This PR try to remove these two opposite collection operations.
## How was this patch tested?
Related unit tests:
ProjectEstimationSuite
CollapseProjectSuite
PushProjectThroughUnionSuite
UnsafeProjectionBenchmark
GeneratedProjectionSuite
CodeGeneratorWithInterpretedFallbackSuite
TakeOrderedAndProjectSuite
GenerateUnsafeProjectionSuite
BucketedRandomProjectionLSHSuite
RemoveRedundantAliasAndProjectSuite
AggregateBenchmark
AggregateOptimizeSuite
AggregateEstimationSuite
DecimalAggregatesSuite
DateFrameAggregateSuite
ObjectHashAggregateSuite
TwoLevelAggregateHashMapSuite
ObjectHashAggregateExecBenchmark
SingleLevelAggregateHaspMapSuite
TypedImperativeAggregateSuite
RewriteDistinctAggregatesSuite
HashAggregationQuerySuite
HashAggregationQueryWithControlledFallbackSuite
TypedImperativeAggregateSuite
TwoLevelAggregateHashMapWithVectorizedMapSuite
Closes#22706 from SongYadong/generate_constraints.
Authored-by: SongYadong <song.yadong1@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
improve the code comment added in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22702/files
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22711 from cloud-fan/minor.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
```Scala
val df1 = Seq(("abc", 1), (null, 3)).toDF("col1", "col2")
df1.write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).parquet("/tmp/test1")
val df2 = spark.read.parquet("/tmp/test1")
df2.filter("col1 = 'abc' OR (col1 != 'abc' AND col2 == 3)").show()
```
Before the PR, it returns both rows. After the fix, it returns `Row ("abc", 1))`. This is to fix the bug in NULL handling in BooleanSimplification. This is a bug introduced in Spark 1.6 release.
## How was this patch tested?
Added test cases
Closes#22702 from gatorsmile/fixBooleanSimplify2.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After the changes, total execution time of `JsonExpressionsSuite.scala` dropped from 12.5 seconds to 3 seconds.
Closes#22657 from MaxGekk/json-timezone-test.
Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <maxim.gekk@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
According to the SQL standard, when a query contains `HAVING`, it indicates an aggregate operator. For more details please refer to https://blog.jooq.org/2014/12/04/do-you-really-understand-sqls-group-by-and-having-clauses/
However, in Spark SQL parser, we treat HAVING as a normal filter when there is no GROUP BY, which breaks SQL semantic and lead to wrong result. This PR fixes the parser.
## How was this patch tested?
new test
Closes#22696 from cloud-fan/having.
Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The HandleNullInputsForUDF rule can generate new If node infinitely, thus causing problems like match of SQL cache missed.
This was fixed in SPARK-24891 and was then broken by SPARK-25044.
The unit test in `AnalysisSuite` added in SPARK-24891 should have failed but didn't because it wasn't properly updated after the `ScalaUDF` constructor signature change. So this PR also updates the test accordingly based on the new `ScalaUDF` constructor.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated the original UT. This should be justified as the original UT became invalid after SPARK-25044.
Closes#22701 from maryannxue/spark-25690.
Authored-by: maryannxue <maryannxue@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR can correctly cause assertion failure when incorrect nullable of DataType in the result is generated by a target function to be tested.
Let us think the following example. In the future, a developer would write incorrect code that returns unexpected result. We have to correctly cause fail in this test since `valueContainsNull=false` while `expr` includes `null`. However, without this PR, this test passes. This PR can correctly cause fail.
```
test("test TARGETFUNCTON") {
val expr = TARGETMAPFUNCTON()
// expr = UnsafeMap(3 -> 6, 7 -> null)
// expr.dataType = (IntegerType, IntegerType, false)
expected = Map(3 -> 6, 7 -> null)
checkEvaluation(expr, expected)
```
In [`checkEvaluationWithUnsafeProjection`](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala#L208-L235), the results are compared using `UnsafeRow`. When the given `expected` is [converted](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala#L226-L227)) to `UnsafeRow` using the `DataType` of `expr`.
```
val expectedRow = UnsafeProjection.create(Array(expression.dataType, expression.dataType)).apply(lit)
```
In summary, `expr` is `[0,1800000038,5000000038,18,2,0,700000003,2,0,6,18,2,0,700000003,2,0,6]` with and w/o this PR. `expected` is converted to
* w/o this PR, `[0,1800000038,5000000038,18,2,0,700000003,2,0,6,18,2,0,700000003,2,0,6]`
* with this PR, `[0,1800000038,5000000038,18,2,0,700000003,2,2,6,18,2,0,700000003,2,2,6]`
As a result, w/o this PR, the test unexpectedly passes.
This is because, w/o this PR, based on given `dataType`, generated code of projection for `expected` avoids to set nullbit.
```
// tmpInput_2 is expected
/* 155 */ for (int index_1 = 0; index_1 < numElements_1; index_1++) {
/* 156 */ mutableStateArray_1[1].write(index_1, tmpInput_2.getInt(index_1));
/* 157 */ }
```
With this PR, generated code of projection for `expected` always checks whether nullbit should be set by `isNullAt`
```
// tmpInput_2 is expected
/* 161 */ for (int index_1 = 0; index_1 < numElements_1; index_1++) {
/* 162 */
/* 163 */ if (tmpInput_2.isNullAt(index_1)) {
/* 164 */ mutableStateArray_1[1].setNull4Bytes(index_1);
/* 165 */ } else {
/* 166 */ mutableStateArray_1[1].write(index_1, tmpInput_2.getInt(index_1));
/* 167 */ }
/* 168 */
/* 169 */ }
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs
Closes#22375 from kiszk/SPARK-25388.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Try testing timezones in parallel instead in CastSuite, instead of random sampling.
See also #22631
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test.
Closes#22672 from srowen/SPARK-25605.2.
Authored-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
While working on another PR, I noticed that there is quite some legacy Java in there that can be beautified. For example the use of features from Java8, such as:
- Collection libraries
- Try-with-resource blocks
No logic has been changed. I think it is important to have a solid codebase with examples that will inspire next PR's to follow up on the best practices.
What are your thoughts on this?
This makes code easier to read, and using try-with-resource makes is less likely to forget to close something.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
No changes in the logic of Spark, but more in the aesthetics of the code.
## How was this patch tested?
Using the existing unit tests. Since no logic is changed, the existing unit tests should pass.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#22637 from Fokko/SPARK-25408.
Authored-by: Fokko Driesprong <fokkodriesprong@godatadriven.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `HashBenchmark` to use main method.
1. use `spark-submit`:
```console
bin/spark-submit --class org.apache.spark.sql.HashBenchmark --jars ./core/target/spark-core_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar ./sql/catalyst/target/spark-catalyst_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar
```
2. Generate benchmark result:
```console
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "catalyst/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.HashBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22651 from wangyum/SPARK-25657.
Lead-authored-by: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor `HashByteArrayBenchmark` to use main method.
1. use `spark-submit`:
```console
bin/spark-submit --class org.apache.spark.sql.HashByteArrayBenchmark --jars ./core/target/spark-core_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar ./sql/catalyst/target/spark-catalyst_2.11-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar
```
2. Generate benchmark result:
```console
SPARK_GENERATE_BENCHMARK_FILES=1 build/sbt "catalyst/test:runMain org.apache.spark.sql.HashByteArrayBenchmark"
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Closes#22652 from wangyum/SPARK-25658.
Lead-authored-by: Yuming Wang <wgyumg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuming Wang <yumwang@ebay.com>
Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clean up the joinCriteria parsing in the parser by directly using identifierList
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Closes#22648 from gatorsmile/cleanupJoinCriteria.
Authored-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds support for the setting limit in the sql split function
## How was this patch tested?
1. Updated unit tests
2. Tested using Scala spark shell
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.
Closes#22227 from phegstrom/master.
Authored-by: Parker Hegstrom <phegstrom@palantir.com>
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
