## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Display `No physical plan. Waiting for data.` instead of `N/A` for StreamingQuery.explain when no data arrives because `N/A` doesn't provide meaningful information.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes#14100 from zsxwing/SPARK-16433.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A structured streaming example with event time windowing.
## How was this patch tested?
Run locally
Author: James Thomas <jamesjoethomas@gmail.com>
Closes#13957 from jjthomas/current.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Temporary tables are used frequently, but `spark.catalog.listColumns` does not support those tables. This PR make `SessionCatalog` supports temporary table column listing.
**Before**
```scala
scala> spark.range(10).createOrReplaceTempView("t1")
scala> spark.catalog.listTables().collect()
res1: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.catalog.Table] = Array(Table[name=`t1`, tableType=`TEMPORARY`, isTemporary=`true`])
scala> spark.catalog.listColumns("t1").collect()
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Table `t1` does not exist in database `default`.;
```
**After**
```
scala> spark.catalog.listColumns("t1").collect()
res2: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.catalog.Column] = Array(Column[name='id', description='id', dataType='bigint', nullable='false', isPartition='false', isBucket='false'])
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests including a new testcase.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14114 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16458.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When users try to implement a data source API with extending only `RelationProvider` and `CreatableRelationProvider`, they will hit an error when resolving the relation.
```Scala
spark.read
.format("org.apache.spark.sql.test.DefaultSourceWithoutUserSpecifiedSchema")
.load()
.write.
format("org.apache.spark.sql.test.DefaultSourceWithoutUserSpecifiedSchema")
.save()
```
The error they hit is like
```
org.apache.spark.sql.test.DefaultSourceWithoutUserSpecifiedSchema does not allow user-specified schemas.;
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: org.apache.spark.sql.test.DefaultSourceWithoutUserSpecifiedSchema does not allow user-specified schemas.;
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSource.resolveRelation(DataSource.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSource.write(DataSource.scala:494)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.save(DataFrameWriter.scala:211)
```
Actually, the bug fix is simple. [`DataSource.createRelation(sparkSession.sqlContext, mode, options, data)`](dd644f8117/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala (L429)) already returns a BaseRelation. We should not assign schema to `userSpecifiedSchema`. That schema assignment only makes sense for the data sources that extend `FileFormat`.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added a test case.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#14075 from gatorsmile/dataSource.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, JDBC Writer uses dialects to get datatypes, but doesn't to quote field names. This PR uses dialects to quote the field names, too.
**Reported Error Scenario (MySQL case)**
```scala
scala> val url="jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/temp"
scala> val prop = new java.util.Properties
scala> prop.setProperty("user","root")
scala> spark.createDataset(Seq("a","b","c")).toDF("order")
scala> df.write.mode("overwrite").jdbc(url, "temptable", prop)
...MySQLSyntaxErrorException: ... near 'order TEXT )
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests and manually do the above case.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14107 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16387.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds an quoteAll option for writing CSV which will quote all fields.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13638
## How was this patch tested?
Added a test to verify the output columns are quoted for all fields in the Dataframe
Author: Jurriaan Pruis <email@jurriaanpruis.nl>
Closes#13374 from jurriaan/csv-quote-all.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
An option that limits the file stream source to read 1 file at a time enables rate limiting. It has the additional convenience that a static set of files can be used like a stream for testing as this will allows those files to be considered one at a time.
This PR adds option `maxFilesPerTrigger`.
## How was this patch tested?
New unit test
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes#14094 from tdas/SPARK-16430.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are cases where `complete` output mode does not output updated aggregated value; for details please refer to [SPARK-16350](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16350).
The cause is that, as we do `data.as[T].foreachPartition { iter => ... }` in `ForeachSink.addBatch()`, `foreachPartition()` does not support incremental planning for now.
This patches makes `foreachPartition()` support incremental planning in `ForeachSink`, by making a special version of `Dataset` with its `rdd()` method supporting incremental planning.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test which failed before the change
Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>
Closes#14030 from lw-lin/fix-foreach-complete.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch removes InSet filter pushdown from Parquet data source, since row-based pushdown is not beneficial to Spark and brings extra complexity to the code base.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#14076 from rxin/SPARK-16400.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When creating a view, a common user error is the number of columns produced by the `SELECT` clause does not match the number of column names specified by `CREATE VIEW`.
For example, given Table `t1` only has 3 columns
```SQL
create view v1(col2, col4, col3, col5) as select * from t1
```
Currently, Spark SQL reports the following error:
```
requirement failed
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed
at scala.Predef$.require(Predef.scala:212)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.CreateViewCommand.run(views.scala:90)
```
This error message is very confusing. This PR is to detect the error and issue a meaningful error message.
#### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#14047 from gatorsmile/viewMismatchedColumns.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, Scala API supports to take options with the types, `String`, `Long`, `Double` and `Boolean` and Python API also supports other types.
This PR corrects `tableProperty` rule to support other types (string, boolean, double and integer) so that support the options for data sources in a consistent way. This will affect other rules such as DBPROPERTIES and TBLPROPERTIES (allowing other types as values).
Also, `TODO add bucketing and partitioning.` was removed because it was resolved in 24bea00047
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test in `MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#13517 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-14839.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, if there is a schema as below:
```
root
|-- _1: struct (nullable = true)
| |-- _1: integer (nullable = true)
```
and if we execute the codes below:
```scala
df.filter("_1 IS NOT NULL").count()
```
This pushes down a filter although this filter is being applied to `StructType`.(If my understanding is correct, Spark does not pushes down filters for those).
The reason is, `ParquetFilters.getFieldMap` produces results below:
```
(_1,StructType(StructField(_1,IntegerType,true)))
(_1,IntegerType)
```
and then it becomes a `Map`
```
(_1,IntegerType)
```
Now, because of ` ....lift(dataTypeOf(name)).map(_(name, value))`, this pushes down filters for `_1` which Parquet thinks is `IntegerType`. However, it is actually `StructType`.
So, Parquet filter2 produces incorrect results, for example, the codes below:
```
df.filter("_1 IS NOT NULL").count()
```
produces always 0.
This PR prevents this by not finding nested fields.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test in `ParquetFilterSuite`.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#14067 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-16371.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
PR #13696 renamed various Parquet support classes but left `CatalystWriteSupport` behind. This PR is renames it as a follow-up.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A.
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes#14070 from liancheng/spark-15979-follow-up.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These two configs should always be true after Spark 2.0. This patch removes them from the config list. Note that ideally this should've gone into branch-2.0, but due to the timing of the release we should only merge this in master for Spark 2.1.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated test cases.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#14061 from rxin/SPARK-16388.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `regexp_replace` function supports `Column` arguments in a query. This PR supports that in a `Dataset` operation, too.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests with a updated testcase.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14060 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16340.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes `SessionState.executeSql` in favor of `SparkSession.sql`. We can remove this safely since the visibility `SessionState` is `private[sql]` and `executeSql` is only used in one **ignored** test, `test("Multiple Hive Instances")`.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14055 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16383.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes the bug that the refresh command does not work on temporary views. This patch is based on https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13989, but removes the public Dataset.refresh() API as well as improved test coverage.
Note that I actually think the public refresh() API is very useful. We can in the future implement it by also invalidating the lazy vals in QueryExecution (or alternatively just create a new QueryExecution).
## How was this patch tested?
Re-enabled a previously ignored test, and added a new test suite for Hive testing behavior of temporary views against MetastoreRelation.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Author: petermaxlee <petermaxlee@gmail.com>
Closes#14009 from rxin/SPARK-16311.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, there are a few reports about Spark 2.0 query performance regression for large queries.
This PR speeds up SQL query processing performance by removing redundant **consecutive `executePlan`** call in `Dataset.ofRows` function and `Dataset` instantiation. Specifically, this PR aims to reduce the overhead of SQL query execution plan generation, not real query execution. So, we can not see the result in the Spark Web UI. Please use the following query script. The result is **25.78 sec** -> **12.36 sec** as expected.
**Sample Query**
```scala
val n = 4000
val values = (1 to n).map(_.toString).mkString(", ")
val columns = (1 to n).map("column" + _).mkString(", ")
val query =
s"""
|SELECT $columns
|FROM VALUES ($values) T($columns)
|WHERE 1=2 AND 1 IN ($columns)
|GROUP BY $columns
|ORDER BY $columns
|""".stripMargin
def time[R](block: => R): R = {
val t0 = System.nanoTime()
val result = block
println("Elapsed time: " + ((System.nanoTime - t0) / 1e9) + "s")
result
}
```
**Before**
```scala
scala> time(sql(query))
Elapsed time: 30.138142577s // First query has a little overhead of initialization.
res0: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [column1: int, column2: int ... 3998 more fields]
scala> time(sql(query))
Elapsed time: 25.787751452s // Let's compare this one.
res1: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [column1: int, column2: int ... 3998 more fields]
```
**After**
```scala
scala> time(sql(query))
Elapsed time: 17.500279659s // First query has a little overhead of initialization.
res0: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [column1: int, column2: int ... 3998 more fields]
scala> time(sql(query))
Elapsed time: 12.364812255s // This shows the real difference. The speed up is about 2 times.
res1: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [column1: int, column2: int ... 3998 more fields]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manual by the above script.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14044 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16360.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
TypedAggregateExpression sets nullable based on the schema of the outputEncoder
## How was this patch tested?
Add test in DatasetAggregatorSuite
Author: Koert Kuipers <koert@tresata.com>
Closes#13532 from koertkuipers/feat-aggregator-nullable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the minor Java linter errors like the following.
```
- public int read(char cbuf[], int off, int len) throws IOException {
+ public int read(char[] cbuf, int off, int len) throws IOException {
```
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
```
$ build/mvn -T 4 -q -DskipTests -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.3 -Pkinesis-asl -Phive -Phive-thriftserver install
$ dev/lint-java
Using `mvn` from path: /usr/local/bin/mvn
Checkstyle checks passed.
```
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#14017 from dongjoon-hyun/minor_build_java_linter_error.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In structured streaming, Spark does not report errors when the specified directory does not exist. This is a behavior different from the batch mode. This patch changes the behavior to fail if the directory does not exist (when the path is not a glob pattern).
## How was this patch tested?
Updated unit tests to reflect the new behavior.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#14002 from rxin/SPARK-16335.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For JDBC data sources, users can specify `batchsize` for multi-row inserts and `fetchsize` for multi-row fetch. A few issues exist:
- The property keys are case sensitive. Thus, the existing test cases for `fetchsize` use incorrect names, `fetchSize`. Basically, the test cases are broken.
- No test case exists for `batchsize`.
- We do not detect the illegal input values for `fetchsize` and `batchsize`.
For example, when `batchsize` is zero, we got the following exception:
```
Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 0 in stage 0.0 failed 1 times, most recent failure: Lost task 0.0 in stage 0.0 (TID 0, localhost): java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero
```
when `fetchsize` is less than zero, we got the exception from the underlying JDBC driver:
```
Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 0 in stage 0.0 failed 1 times, most recent failure: Lost task 0.0 in stage 0.0 (TID 0, localhost): org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Invalid value "-1" for parameter "rows" [90008-183]
```
This PR fixes all the above issues, and issue the appropriate exceptions when detecting the illegal inputs for `fetchsize` and `batchsize`. Also update the function descriptions.
#### How was this patch tested?
Test cases are fixed and added.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13919 from gatorsmile/jdbcProperties.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark silently drops exceptions during file listing. This is a very bad behavior because it can mask legitimate errors and the resulting plan will silently have 0 rows. This patch changes it to not silently drop the errors.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually verified.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#13987 from rxin/SPARK-16313.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch appends a message to suggest users running refresh table or reloading data frames when Spark sees a FileNotFoundException due to stale, cached metadata.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a unit test for this in MetadataCacheSuite.
Author: petermaxlee <petermaxlee@gmail.com>
Closes#14003 from petermaxlee/SPARK-16336.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR implements `posexplode` table generating function. Currently, master branch raises the following exception for `map` argument. It's different from Hive.
**Before**
```scala
scala> sql("select posexplode(map('a', 1, 'b', 2))").show
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: No handler for Hive UDF ... posexplode() takes an array as a parameter; line 1 pos 7
```
**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select posexplode(map('a', 1, 'b', 2))").show
+---+---+-----+
|pos|key|value|
+---+---+-----+
| 0| a| 1|
| 1| b| 2|
+---+---+-----+
```
For `array` argument, `after` is the same with `before`.
```
scala> sql("select posexplode(array(1, 2, 3))").show
+---+---+
|pos|col|
+---+---+
| 0| 1|
| 1| 2|
| 2| 3|
+---+---+
```
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests with newly added testcases.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13971 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16289.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Force the sorter to Spill when number of elements in the pointer array reach a certain size. This is to workaround the issue of timSort failing on large buffer size.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested by running a job which was failing without this change due to TimSort bug.
Author: Sital Kedia <skedia@fb.com>
Closes#13107 from sitalkedia/fix_TimSort.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Catalog.refreshTable API into python interface for Spark-SQL.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test.
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes#13558 from WeichenXu123/update_python_sql_interface_refreshTable.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds 3 optimizer rules for typed filter:
1. push typed filter down through `SerializeFromObject` and eliminate the deserialization in filter condition.
2. pull typed filter up through `SerializeFromObject` and eliminate the deserialization in filter condition.
3. combine adjacent typed filters and share the deserialized object among all the condition expressions.
This PR also adds `TypedFilter` logical plan, to separate it from normal filter, so that the concept is more clear and it's easier to write optimizer rules.
## How was this patch tested?
`TypedFilterOptimizationSuite`
Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Closes#13846 from cloud-fan/filter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR allows `emptyDataFrame.write` since the user didn't specify any partition columns.
**Before**
```scala
scala> spark.emptyDataFrame.write.parquet("/tmp/t1")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot use all columns for partition columns;
scala> spark.emptyDataFrame.write.csv("/tmp/t1")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Cannot use all columns for partition columns;
```
After this PR, there occurs no exceptions and the created directory has only one file, `_SUCCESS`, as expected.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests including updated test cases.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13730 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16006.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes meaningless `StringIteratorReader` for CSV data source.
In `CSVParser.scala`, there is an `Reader` wrapping `Iterator` but there are two problems by this.
Firstly, it was actually not faster than processing line by line with Iterator due to additional logics to wrap `Iterator` to `Reader`.
Secondly, this brought a bit of complexity because it needs additional logics to allow every line to be read bytes by bytes. So, it was pretty difficult to figure out issues about parsing, (eg. SPARK-14103).
A benchmark was performed manually and the results were below:
- Original codes with Reader wrapping Iterator
|End-to-end (ns) | Parse Time (ns) |
|-----------------------|------------------------|
|14116265034 |2008277960 |
- New codes with Iterator
|End-to-end (ns) | Parse Time (ns) |
|-----------------------|------------------------|
|13451699644 | 1549050564 |
For the details for the environment, dataset and methods, please refer the JIRA ticket.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests should cover this.
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes#13808 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-14480-small.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Based on the previous discussion with cloud-fan hvanhovell in another related PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13764#discussion_r67994276, it looks reasonable to add convenience methods for users to add `comment` when defining `StructField`.
Currently, the column-related `comment` attribute is stored in `Metadata` of `StructField`. For example, users can add the `comment` attribute using the following way:
```Scala
StructType(
StructField(
"cl1",
IntegerType,
nullable = false,
new MetadataBuilder().putString("comment", "test").build()) :: Nil)
```
This PR is to add more user friendly methods for the `comment` attribute when defining a `StructField`. After the changes, users are provided three different ways to do it:
```Scala
val struct = (new StructType)
.add("a", "int", true, "test1")
val struct = (new StructType)
.add("c", StringType, true, "test3")
val struct = (new StructType)
.add(StructField("d", StringType).withComment("test4"))
```
#### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases:
- `DataTypeSuite` is for testing three types of API changes,
- `DataFrameReaderWriterSuite` is for parquet, json and csv formats - using in-memory catalog
- `OrcQuerySuite.scala` is for orc format using Hive-metastore
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13860 from gatorsmile/newMethodForComment.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change the return type mentioned in the JavaDoc for `toJavaRDD` / `javaRDD` to match the actual return type & be consistent with the scala rdd return type.
## How was this patch tested?
Docs only change.
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13954 from holdenk/trivial-streaming-tojavardd-doc-fix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes a couple old references to `DataFrameWriter.startStream` to `DataStreamWriter.start
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes#13952 from brkyvz/minor-doc-fix.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
koertkuipers identified the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727/ changed the behavior of `load` API. After the change, the `load` API does not add the value of `path` into the `options`. Thank you!
This PR is to add the option `path` back to `load()` API in `DataFrameReader`, if and only if users specify one and only one `path` in the `load` API. For example, users can see the `path` option after the following API call,
```Scala
spark.read
.format("parquet")
.load("/test")
```
#### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases.
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13933 from gatorsmile/optionPath.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allowing truncate to a specific number of character is convenient at times, especially while operating from the REPL. Sometimes those last few characters make all the difference, and showing everything brings in whole lot of noise.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests. + 1 new test in DataFrameSuite.
For SparkR and pyspark, existing tests and manual testing.
Author: Prashant Sharma <prashsh1@in.ibm.com>
Author: Prashant Sharma <prashant@apache.org>
Closes#13839 from ScrapCodes/add_truncateTo_DF.show.
#### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The API description of `createRelation` in `CreatableRelationProvider` is misleading. The current description only expects users to return the relation.
```Scala
trait CreatableRelationProvider {
def createRelation(
sqlContext: SQLContext,
mode: SaveMode,
parameters: Map[String, String],
data: DataFrame): BaseRelation
}
```
However, the major goal of this API should also include saving the `DataFrame`.
Since this API is critical for Data Source API developers, this PR is to correct the description.
#### How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Closes#13903 from gatorsmile/readUnderscoreFiles.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[SPARK-8118](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8196) implements redirecting Parquet JUL logger via SLF4J, but it is currently applied only when READ operations occurs. If users use only WRITE operations, there occurs many Parquet logs.
This PR makes the redirection work on WRITE operations, too.
**Before**
```scala
scala> spark.range(10).write.format("parquet").mode("overwrite").save("/tmp/p")
SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further details.
Jun 26, 2016 9:04:38 PM INFO: org.apache.parquet.hadoop.codec.CodecConfig: Compression: SNAPPY
............ about 70 lines Parquet Log .............
scala> spark.range(10).write.format("parquet").mode("overwrite").save("/tmp/p")
............ about 70 lines Parquet Log .............
```
**After**
```scala
scala> spark.range(10).write.format("parquet").mode("overwrite").save("/tmp/p")
SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for further details.
scala> spark.range(10).write.format("parquet").mode("overwrite").save("/tmp/p")
```
This PR also fixes some typos.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual.
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13918 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16221.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark currently shows all functions when issue a `SHOW FUNCTIONS` command. This PR refines the `SHOW FUNCTIONS` command by allowing users to select all functions, user defined function or system functions. The following syntax can be used:
**ALL** (default)
```SHOW FUNCTIONS```
```SHOW ALL FUNCTIONS```
**SYSTEM**
```SHOW SYSTEM FUNCTIONS```
**USER**
```SHOW USER FUNCTIONS```
## How was this patch tested?
Updated tests and added tests to the DDLSuite
Author: Herman van Hovell <hvanhovell@databricks.com>
Closes#13929 from hvanhovell/SPARK-16220.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `conf` method to get Runtime Config from SparkSession
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests, manual tests
This is how it works in sparkR shell:
```
SparkSession available as 'spark'.
> conf()
$hive.metastore.warehouse.dir
[1] "file:/opt/spark-2.0.0-bin-hadoop2.6/R/spark-warehouse"
$spark.app.id
[1] "local-1466749575523"
$spark.app.name
[1] "SparkR"
$spark.driver.host
[1] "10.0.2.1"
$spark.driver.port
[1] "45629"
$spark.executorEnv.LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[1] "$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/lib/R/lib:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu:/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/lib/amd64/server"
$spark.executor.id
[1] "driver"
$spark.home
[1] "/opt/spark-2.0.0-bin-hadoop2.6"
$spark.master
[1] "local[*]"
$spark.sql.catalogImplementation
[1] "hive"
$spark.submit.deployMode
[1] "client"
> conf("spark.master")
$spark.master
[1] "local[*]"
```
Author: Felix Cheung <felixcheung_m@hotmail.com>
Closes#13885 from felixcheung/rconf.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the initial buffer size in the sorter is hard coded inside the code and is too small for large workload. As a result, the sorter spends significant time expanding the buffer size and copying the data. It would be useful to have it configurable.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested by running a job on the cluster.
Author: Sital Kedia <skedia@fb.com>
Closes#13699 from sitalkedia/config_sort_buffer_upstream.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
One of the most frequent usage patterns for Spark SQL is using **cached tables**. This PR improves `InMemoryTableScanExec` to handle `IN` predicate efficiently by pruning partition batches. Of course, the performance improvement varies over the queries and the datasets. But, for the following simple query, the query duration in Spark UI goes from 9 seconds to 50~90ms. It's about over 100 times faster.
**Before**
```scala
$ bin/spark-shell --driver-memory 6G
scala> val df = spark.range(2000000000)
scala> df.createOrReplaceTempView("t")
scala> spark.catalog.cacheTable("t")
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect() // About 2 mins
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect() // less than 90ms
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // 9 seconds
```
**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // less than 90ms
```
This PR has impacts over 35 queries of TPC-DS if the tables are cached.
Note that this optimization is applied for `IN`. To apply `IN` predicate having more than 10 items, `spark.sql.optimizer.inSetConversionThreshold` option should be increased.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests (including new testcases).
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13887 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16186.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow to specify empty over clause in window expressions through dataset API
In SQL, its allowed to specify an empty OVER clause in the window expression.
```SQL
select area, sum(product) over () as c from windowData
where product > 3 group by area, product
having avg(month) > 0 order by avg(month), product
```
In this case the analytic function sum is presented based on all the rows of the result set
Currently its not allowed through dataset API and is handled in this PR.
## How was this patch tested?
Added a new test in DataframeWindowSuite
Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com>
Closes#13897 from dilipbiswal/spark-empty-over.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes `DataFrame.describe()` by forcing materialization to make the `Seq` serializable. Currently, `describe()` of DataFrame throws `Task not serializable` Spark exceptions when joining in Scala 2.10.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual. (After building with Scala 2.10, test on `bin/spark-shell` and `bin/pyspark`.)
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13900 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16173.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
One of the most frequent usage patterns for Spark SQL is using **cached tables**. This PR improves `InMemoryTableScanExec` to handle `IN` predicate efficiently by pruning partition batches. Of course, the performance improvement varies over the queries and the datasets. But, for the following simple query, the query duration in Spark UI goes from 9 seconds to 50~90ms. It's about over 100 times faster.
**Before**
```scala
$ bin/spark-shell --driver-memory 6G
scala> val df = spark.range(2000000000)
scala> df.createOrReplaceTempView("t")
scala> spark.catalog.cacheTable("t")
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect() // About 2 mins
scala> sql("select id from t where id = 1").collect() // less than 90ms
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // 9 seconds
```
**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select id from t where id in (1,2,3)").collect() // less than 90ms
```
This PR has impacts over 35 queries of TPC-DS if the tables are cached.
Note that this optimization is applied for `IN`. To apply `IN` predicate having more than 10 items, `spark.sql.optimizer.inSetConversionThreshold` option should be increased.
## How was this patch tested?
Pass the Jenkins tests (including new testcases).
Author: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Closes#13887 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-16186.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fix the bug when Python UDF is used in explode (generator), GenerateExec requires that all the attributes in expressions should be resolvable from children when creating, we should replace the children first, then replace it's expressions.
```
>>> df.select(explode(f(*df))).show()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py", line 286, in show
print(self._jdf.showString(n, truncate))
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/java_gateway.py", line 933, in __call__
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/pyspark/sql/utils.py", line 63, in deco
return f(*a, **kw)
File "/home/vlad/dev/spark/python/lib/py4j-0.10.1-src.zip/py4j/protocol.py", line 312, in get_return_value
py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o52.showString.
: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: makeCopy, tree:
Generate explode(<lambda>(_1#0L)), false, false, [col#15L]
+- Scan ExistingRDD[_1#0L]
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.makeCopy(TreeNode.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.makeCopy(SparkPlan.scala:45)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.transformExpressionsDown(QueryPlan.scala:177)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.transformExpressions(QueryPlan.scala:144)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.org$apache$spark$sql$execution$python$ExtractPythonUDFs$$extract(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:153)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:114)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$$anonfun$apply$2.applyOrElse(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:113)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:301)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:301)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:300)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$4.apply(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$4.apply(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$5.apply(TreeNode.scala:321)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformChildren(TreeNode.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:298)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.apply(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:113)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.ExtractPythonUDFs$.apply(ExtractPythonUDFs.scala:93)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$prepareForExecution$1.apply(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution$$anonfun$prepareForExecution$1.apply(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized$class.foldLeft(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:124)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foldLeft(List.scala:84)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.prepareForExecution(QueryExecution.scala:95)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.executedPlan$lzycompute(QueryExecution.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.executedPlan(QueryExecution.scala:85)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.withTypedCallback(Dataset.scala:2557)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.head(Dataset.scala:1923)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.take(Dataset.scala:2138)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.showString(Dataset.scala:239)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at py4j.reflection.MethodInvoker.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:237)
at py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.invoke(ReflectionEngine.java:357)
at py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:280)
at py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:128)
at py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
at py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:211)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:423)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(TreeNode.scala:413)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1$$anonfun$apply$13.apply(TreeNode.scala:413)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:412)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$makeCopy$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:387)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:49)
... 42 more
Caused by: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$TreeNodeException: Binding attribute, tree: pythonUDF0#20
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:50)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1.applyOrElse(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$3.apply(TreeNode.scala:279)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$3.apply(TreeNode.scala:279)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:69)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:278)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformDown$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$5.apply(TreeNode.scala:321)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.mapProductIterator(TreeNode.scala:179)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformChildren(TreeNode.scala:319)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformDown(TreeNode.scala:284)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transform(TreeNode.scala:268)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$.bindReference(BoundAttribute.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.GenerateExec.<init>(GenerateExec.scala:63)
... 52 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Couldn't find pythonUDF0#20 in [_1#0L]
at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:94)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.BindReferences$$anonfun$bindReference$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$1.apply(BoundAttribute.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.package$.attachTree(package.scala:49)
... 67 more
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added regression tests.
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes#13883 from davies/udf_in_generate.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a small patch to rewrite the predicate filter translation in DataSourceStrategy. The original code used excessive functional constructs (e.g. unzip) and was very difficult to understand.
## How was this patch tested?
Should be covered by existing tests.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes#13889 from rxin/simplify-predicate-filter.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace use of `commons-lang` in favor of `commons-lang3` and forbid the former via scalastyle; remove `NotImplementedException` from `comons-lang` in favor of JDK `UnsupportedOperationException`
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes#13843 from srowen/SPARK-16129.